Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with growing rods in patients with neurofibromatosis-1

Clinical features and surgical treatments of scoliosis in neurofibromatosis type 1: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF 1) is an autosomal-dominant tumor predisposition genetic disease affecting approximately 1 in 3000 live births. The condition could present various manifestations ranging from skin abnormalities to neurological tumors. The musculoskeletal system could also be frequently affected, and scoliosis is the most common orthopedic manifestation. Characterized by the early-onset and rapid progression tendency, NF 1-related dystrophic scoliosis presented discrepancies from idiopathic scoliosis in terms of natural history, clinical features, and management outcomes and thus required special attention. In the current study, the authors conducted a systemic review to outline the body of evidence of the natural history, clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and surgical complications of NF 1-induced scoliosis, aiming to provide an elucidative insight into this condition.

METHOD

Systemic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection up to December 27, 2022, using related keywords. Clinical features such as frequencies, segmental involvement, and hereditary information were summarized and described qualitatively. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software and the 'meta' package to yield an overall outcome of efficacy and safety of surgical management, precisely, spinal fusion procedure and growing rods procedure. Corrective rate of Cobb angle, sagittal kyphosis angle, and T1-S1 length post-operative and at the last follow-up was used to evaluate the efficacy, and the occurrence of surgery-related complications was used to evaluate the safety.

RESULT

A total of 37 articles involving 1023 patients were included. Approximately 26.6% of the NF 1 patients would present with scoliosis. Patients tend to develop scoliosis at an earlier age. The thoracic part turned out to be the most affected segment. No obvious correlation between scoliosis and genotype or hereditary type was observed. Both spinal fusion and growing rod surgery have shown acceptable treatment outcomes, with spinal fusion demonstrating better performance in terms of effectiveness and safety. The growing rods technique seemed to allow a better lengthening of the spine. The mainstay post-operative complications were implant-related complications but could be managed with limited revision surgery. Severe neurological deficits were rarely reported.

CONCLUSION

Scoliosis, especially the subtype characterized by dystrophic bony changes, is a significant orthopedic manifestation of NF1. It has an early onset, a tendency to persistently and rapidly progress, and is challenging to deal with. The current review outlines the available evidence from the perspective of natural history, clinical features, and the treatment efficacy and safety of the mainstay surgical options. Patients with NF1 scoliosis will benefit from a better understanding of the disease and evidence based treatment strategies.

Kinematic and biomechanical responses of the spine to distraction surgery in children with early onset scoliosis: A 3-D finite element analysis

Periodical and consecutive distraction is an effective treatment for severe early onset scoliosis (EOS), which enables the spinal coronal and sagittal plane deformity correction. However, the rate of rod fractures and postoperative complications was still high mainly related to the distraction process. Previous studies have primarily investigated the maximum safe distraction force without a rod broken, neglecting the spinal re-imbalance and distraction energy consumption, which is equally vital to evaluate the operative value. This study aimed to reveal the kinematic and biomechanical responses occurring after spinal distraction surgery, which were affected by traditional bilateral fixation. The spinal models (C6-S1) before four distractions were reconstructed based on CT images and the growing rods were applied with the upward displacement load of 0–25 mm at an interval of 5 mm. Relationships between the distraction distance, the distraction force and the thoracic and lumbar Cobb angle were revealed, and the spinal displacement and rotation in three-dimensional directions were measured. The spinal overall imbalance would also happen during the distraction process even under the safe force, which was characterized by unexpected cervical lordosis and lateral displacement. Additionally, the law of diminishing return has been confirmed by comparing the distraction energy consumption in different distraction distances, which suggests that more attention paid to the spinal kinematic and biomechanical changes is better than to the distraction force. Notably, the selection of fixed segments significantly impacts the distraction force at the same distraction distance. Accordingly, some results could provide a better understanding of spinal distraction surgery.

Genotypes and clinical intervention of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 associated dystrophic scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the genotypic characteristics of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated dystrophic scoliosis and to summarize the outcomes of the surgical treatment of these patients.

METHODS

Exome sequencing (ES) combined with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used for genotypic identification. All patients underwent surgical treatments for spinal deformities, and the outcomes of the surgery was summarized by analyzing the clinical and imaging parameters before and after the surgery.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (six males and eight females) were clinically diagnosed as NF1 associated dystrophic scoliosis with common symptoms including café-au-lait spots, paravertebral tumors, and dystrophic scoliosis. NF1 mutations were detected in 12 (85.7%) patients, including four nonsense mutations, three splicing mutations, three frameshift mutations, and two exon deletions. The first surgical procedure included growing-rod surgery in 10 patients and posterior spinal fusion in four patients. The follow-up duration was 2.3 years (1.0-10.3 years), and the Cobb angle of the main curve improved from 61.5° (30°-125°) pre-operatively to 14.5° (0°-42°) at the last follow-up, with an average correction rate of 74.0% (44-100%). Instrumentation-related complications occurred in four patients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with dystrophic scoliosis who met the clinical diagnostic criteria for NF1, the mutation detection rate of ES combined with MLPA was 85.7%. There was no mutation hotspot in NF1 gene, molecular diagnosis could offer information about genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics. Surgical treatment according to patient's age and severity could effectively correct the spinal deformities.

Smaller Intervertebral Disc Volume and More Disc Degeneration after Spinal Distraction in Scoliotic Children

In recent decades, magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) were established to treat progressive early-onset scoliosis. The aim of this investigation was to assess the effect of long-term MCGR with continuous distraction on intervertebral discs in scoliotic children. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 33 children with spinal muscular atrophy was analyzed by grading intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) and measuring intervertebral disc volume. Cohort I (n = 17) were children who had continuous spinal distraction with MCGRs for 5.1 years and MRI before (av. age 8.1) and after (av. age 13.4) MCGR treatment. Cohort II (n = 16, av. age 13.7) were patients without prior surgical treatment. Lumbar intervertebral disc volume of cohort I did not change during 5.1 years of MCGR treatment, whereas disc volumes were significantly larger in age- and disease-matched children without prior treatment (cohort II). Cohort I showed more IDD after MCGR treatment in comparison to early MRI studies of the same patients and children without surgical treatment. MRI data showed a volume reduction and disc degeneration of lower thoracic and lumbar intervertebral discs in scoliotic children after continuous spinal distraction with MCGRs. These effects were confirmed in the same subjects before and after treatment as well as in surgically untreated controls.

Comparison of Early Definitive Fusion and Traditional Growing Rods in Early-onset Dystrophic Scoliosis in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND

Early definitive spinal fusion (EF) has been widely recommended to avoid spinal deformity progression for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). In contrast, growing rod (GR) procedure has recently been recommended for EOS associated with the dystrophic type NF-1. However, no studies have compared the surgical outcomes between EF and GR procedure for EOS with NF-1. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of EF versus GR for early onset and dystrophic scoliosis with NF-1.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter study; 26 EOS patients with dystrophic type of NF-1 who underwent EF (16 patients) or GR (10 patients) were investigated. We compared age at first surgery, fused levels, total number of surgeries, coronal major curve, complication rates, spinal height (T1-T12 and T1-S1 length), and forced vital capacity between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The mean age at first surgery was 7.3 years in the EF and 5.8 years in the GR (P<0.05). The mean follow-up period was 12.8 and 10.5 years, respectively. The 2 groups did not show significant differences in preoperative major Cobb angle (75.1 vs. 83.1 degrees), complication rate (53% vs. 60%), and increase rate of T1-T12 (20.0% vs. 30.4%). However, significant differences (P<0.05) were recognized in fusion segments (13.9 vs. 15.8), total numbers of surgery (2.6 vs. 10.1), correction rate of major curve (59.0% vs. 40.6%), increase rate of T1-S1 (19.0% vs. 33.9%), body height at final follow-up (151 vs. 142 cm), and forced vital capacity at final follow-up (2.23 vs. 1.46 L).

CONCLUSIONS

Early fusion is still a viable option for progressive EOS with dystrophic type of NF-1 even in the growth-friendly era. Surgeons should consider the best procedure for each patient taking into account the severity of dystrophic change when treating EOS with NF-1.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Outcomes of growing rods in a series of early-onset scoliosis patients with neurofibromatosis type 1

OBJECTIVE

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is not uncommon in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Despite conservative treatment, spinal deformities progress and require early surgical intervention. To avoid potential interference with chest and trunk growth, growing rods (GRs) have been used effectively in EOS of various etiologies. In this study the authors sought to analyze the outcomes of GRs in EOS patients with NF1.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study that included consecutive EOS patients with NF1 who were treated with GRs and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Clinical and radiological analyses were performed preoperatively and until the last follow-up.

RESULTS

From to 2008 to 2017, 18 patients (6 male, 12 female) underwent GR surgery (14 single GRs, 4 dual GRs) at a mean age of 8 ± 2.1 years. Mean follow-up was 5 ± 2.4 years. Fifty-five lengthenings were performed at a mean rate of 3 lengthenings per patient (range 0-7). Ten of 14 single GRs (71%) were converted into dual GRs during treatment. No patient underwent definitive posterior spinal fusion (PSF) at GR treatment completion. The mean initial and last follow-up major curves were 57° and 36°, respectively (p < 0.001, 37% correction). The average T1-S1 increase was 13 mm/yr. Six of 9 hyperkyphotic patients had normal kyphosis at last follow-up. There were 26 complications involving 13 patients (72%), with 1 patient who required unplanned revision. The primary complications were instrumentation related, consisting of 17 proximal hook dislodgments, 6 distal pedicle screw pullouts, and 2 rod fractures. Only 1 patient experienced a mechanical complication after dual GR implantation. There were no wound infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The GR technique provided satisfactory spinal deformity control in EOS patients with NF1 while allowing substantial spinal growth. Adequately contoured dual GRs with proximal hooks placed in nondystrophic regions should be used to minimize implant-related complications. Surgeons should not attempt to correct kyphosis at GR implantation.