Blood loss in hip reconstructive surgery in children with cerebral palsy: when do I need to be prepared for blood transfusion?

Hip reconstruction in children with cerebral palsy: does magnitude of surgery influence complications and outcomes?

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) and neuromuscular hip dysplasia (NMHD) frequently require hip reconstruction including femoral and pelvic osteotomies. Outcomes and complications in CP patients with NMHD who underwent varying degrees of hip reconstruction surgeries were examined. Ninety-nine patients with a diagnosis of CP who underwent surgical management of NMHD over a 15-year period (2005-2020) were reviewed. Three patient cohorts with varying degrees of surgery were analyzed including: (1) unilateral femoral osteotomy with pelvic osteotomy; (2) bilateral femoral osteotomy with unilateral pelvic osteotomy; and (3) simultaneous bilateral femoral osteotomy and bilateral pelvic osteotomy. Data points included operative (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), and transfusion requirement. Complications during the perioperative and postoperative periods were identified and graded by severity. Increased EBL, need for transfusion, OR time, and LOS were observed more frequently in patients undergoing bilateral reconstruction. Complication rates were high for all three cohorts, with 87% of cases in the bilateral pelvic osteotomy cohort experiencing ≥1 complication. However, 90% of these were considered grade I or II and required no or minimal intervention. The average postoperative migration index at final follow-up for treated hips was significantly less in bilateral pelvic osteotomy cases. Patients with CP and bilateral NMHD can be safely managed with bilateral simultaneous comprehensive reconstruction. The data presented in this study can help both surgeons and families anticipate a more accurate postoperative course. Level of evidence: III.

Unique Issues Related to Regional Anesthesia in Pediatric Orthopedics

This article will narrow its focus largely to notable issues related to regional anesthesia in pediatrics. First, the controversy surrounding awake versus anesthetized block placement will be addressed. There will also be a discussion on the use of regional anesthetics in orthopedics cases and the risk of compartment syndrome. Subsequently, the concern for regional anesthetics in the setting of an instrumented spine (eg, following spine fusion, baclofen pump placement) will be reviewed as such can have significant ramifications for patients. Finally, this article will consider ambulatory regional catheters and their increasing use in pediatric orthopedic anesthesia. Their utilization during the COVD epidemic played a key role in facilitating procedures that would have been canceled due to the protracted hospital bed shortage.