Prevention of ulnar nerve injury during fixation of supracondylar fractures in children by 'flexion-extension cross-pinning' technique

Is Lateral Onset Cross Pin Technique Strong Enough? A Biomechanical Study

Objectives

It is aimed to compare biomechanically the 3 different pin techniques and the lateral onset cross-pinning (LXP) technique in supracondylar humeral fractures.

Methods

Biomechanical testing was performed on 52 synthetic humeriFour pin configurations techniques were tested: crossed pins (XP), 2 lateral pins (2LP), 3 lateral pins (3LP), and LXP technique. Biomechanical testing was performed on Shimadzu Autograph measuring machine. Each pin configuration was tested in a total of 13 humeri: 4 in varus bending, 4 in valgus bending, and 5 in flexion bending. Displacement (mm), and load (N) data were sampled at 10 Hz during each test.

Results

Varus values were statistically lower in 2 LP group comparing to XP, 3 LP, LXP groups (p=0.01, p=0.02, p=0.012, consequently). Flexion load values statistically lower in 2 LP group comparing to XP, 3 LP, LXP groups (p=0.03, p=0.001, p=0,031, consequently). There was no difference between the groups in terms of valgus values (p>0.05).

Conclusion

LXP technique is biomechanically similar to the traditional XP technique. In situations where orthopedic surgeons choose to use medial pins in addition to lateral pins such as distal humerus fractures with medial-sided defects.

Beneficial Perioperative Aspects Favor the Use of Percutaneous Crossed Pinning over Antegrade Nailing in Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures-A Retrospective Comparative Study

(1) Background: Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric patients can be treated by either antegrade nailing (AN) or percutaneous crossed pinning (PCP). The aim of this study was to compare the intra- and perioperative management, complications and outcome of AN and PCP. (2) Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 271 individuals (median age 5 years, IQR 4-7 years) who underwent AN (n = 173) or PCP (n = 98). Patient history was analyzed for incidence of nerve injuries, postoperative treatment, postoperative malrotation, time of hospital stay, time to implant removal and revision rate. Operative procedures were investigated for duration and radiation exposure. (3) Results: PCP was associated with a significantly lower radiation exposure (dose area product: PCP mean 20.1 cGycm² vs. AN mean 34.7 cGycm², p < 0.001; fluoroscopy time: PCP mean 1.1 min, range 0.1-8.1 min, vs. AN mean 1.5 min, range 0.1-7.1 min, p < 0.001), duration of surgery (PCP mean 32.2 min vs. AN mean 48.3 min, p < 0.001) and time to implant removal (PCP mean 37 days vs. AN mean 113 days, p < 0.001). Cast removal was performed earlier in the AN group (PCP mean 30.2 days vs. AN mean 20.4 days, p < 0.001) and there were fewer iatrogenic nerve lesions (PCP: 24% vs. AN: 8%, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: In the investigated study population, the analyzed parameters seem to favor the use of PCP. The advantages of AN should be weighed against its drawbacks. For special indications, AN remains a relevant technique in supracondylar fracture treatment, and surgeons should be familiar with this procedure.

Risk of ulnar nerve injury during cross-pinning in supine and prone position for supracondylar humeral fractures in children: a recent literature review

Aim of this review article is to evaluate the percentage of ulnar nerve lesion during cross-pinning considering the patient's position (supine or prone) on the surgical bed. Comprehensive research was performed by searching in PUBMED, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS and Clinicaltrials.gov from 2005. Children with extension type supracondylar humeral fractures without clinical signs of ulnar nerve lesion at presentation were included. A total of 28 papers were examined including 2147 patients; 1541 underwent a closed reduction and cross-pinning in supine position and 606 in prone position. Among 1541 patients in supine position, 69 (4.5%) suffered from a ulnar nerve injury while among the 606 patients treated in prone position none ulnar nerve lesions were reported. Despite the apparent safety of prone position, further larger studies, comparing the patient's position on the surgical bed, need to be carried out in order to confirm this likelihood.

Advantages and disadvantages of the prone position in the surgical treatment of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. A literature review

INTRODUCTION

Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common elbow injuries in children. The widely adopted approach for Gartland III extension type consists of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning; the pin configuration can be lateral or crossed in relationship with the habit of the surgeons. Iatrogenic injury of the ulnar nerve is the most common risk during the insertion of the medial pin. The aim of this study was to analyze advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous pinning with the patient in prone position.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review of the period 2005-2017 was carried out; four medical search engine (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science and Scopus) were consulted using the review's filter and the key words "Ulnar nerve AND supracondylar humerus fractures". The total number of patients were analyzed for: ulnar nerve injuries, anesthesiologic management, time of surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine papers were read, 23 regarding cross pinning in supine position and 6 in prone position. On one hand, 1529 children were treated with closed reduction and cross pinning in supine position; 69 of these patients (4.5%) suffered from iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. On the other hand, 579 patients underwent the same treatment in prone position; no ulnar nerve lesions were reported in this group. Only one article compared both groups of children in supine and prone position regarding time of anesthesia which is slightly higher in the prone group. There were no differences between supine and prone positions regarding x-ray exposition, time of surgery, closed reduction manoeuvers, pin positioning, x-ray results, clinical and functional results.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The ulnar nerve in children is hypermobile in the cubital tunnel and tends to dislocate anteriorly over the medial epicondyle, especially when the elbow is in hyperflexion. This may be the reason of the increased risk of nerve injury during the insertion of the medial pin in supine position and, instead, an advantage of the prone position. The insertion of both pins from the lateral side could reduce this complication. Larger studies need to be carried out regarding the reported higher duration of anesthesia in prone position.

Outcomes of Gartland type III supracondylar fractures treated using Blount's method

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar fractures of the elbow with major displacement are usually treated by surgical pinning and less often non-operatively as described by Blount. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of Gartland type III supracondylar fractures treated at least 3 years earlier using Blount's method.

HYPOTHESIS

Blount's method produces good outcomes after more than 3 years when used to treat Gartland type III supracondylar fractures of the humerus.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective study was done in paediatric patients who were seen within 24hours after sustaining a Gartland type III supracondylar fracture then re-evaluated at least 36 months after treatment. Closed reduction was performed either in the operating room under general anaesthesia or in the radiology suite under procedural sedation. The upper limb was then immobilised for 4 weeks using the cuff-and-collar method described by Blount (mean elbow flexion, 134°). The child was evaluated and radiographs obtained at the outpatient clinic on days 7 and 14. Functional outcomes were assessed using the 1962 SoFCOT criteria and Flynn's criteria and the radiological outcome using Baumann's angle, the humero-condylar angle, and distal fragment rotation. From 2009 to 2013, 22 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 57 months.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes assessed using the 1962 SoFCOT criteria were very good in 15 patients and good in the remaining 7 patients. The rate of satisfactory outcomes according to Flynn's criteria was 100%. At last follow-up, mean Baumann's angle was 68°, mean humerocondylar angle was 42°, and 2 patients had residual rotation of the distal fragment.

CONCLUSION

This work confirms the effectiveness of Blount's method for treating Gartland type III supracondylar fractures. We advocate routine first-line treatment of these fractures using Blount's method in the absence of vascular compromise and instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

The outcome and parents-based cosmetic satisfaction following fixation of paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated by closed method with or without small medial incision

Supracondylar humerus fractures are common in children. Displaced fractures are usually treated with closed reduction and cross pin fixation. But, medial pinning may cause the ulnar nerve injury. The aim of this study was to compare the parents-based cosmetic satisfaction of the incision scars in children with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures treated by closed reduction and cross pin fixation with or without small medial incision. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 72 children with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures treated two different closed reduction and percutaneous pinning methods at our institution from January 2010 through December 2013. A group has 36 patients treated with small medial incision and crossed K-wires fixation after closed reduction. The other group has 36 patients treated with closed reduction and K-wires fixation. At the final follow-up, the patients were evaluated radiologically and clinically with Flynn’s criteria. Furthermore, a visual analogue scale was used to determine of the parents-based cosmetic satisfaction score. All fractures healed without major complications at the final clinical and radiological assessment. Although, between the two groups did not differ in terms of Flynn cosmetic and functional outcomes, there were statistically significant differences between both groups according to the parents-based cosmetic satisfaction scores. The closed reduction and crossed pin fixation without small medial incision should be preferred first because of better the parents-based cosmetic satisfaction.

Stiffness of various pin configurations for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture: a systematic review on biomechanical studies

To compare the biomechanical stability of various pin configurations for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures under varus, internal rotation, and extension conditions. After electronic retrieval, 11 biomechanical studies were included. Stiffness values of pin configurations under different loading conditions were extracted and pooled. There were no statistically significant differences between two cross pins and two divergent lateral pins on the basis of the 'Hamdi method' (P=0.249-0.737). An additional pin did not strengthen two-pin construct (P=0.124-0.367), but better stabilized fractures with medial comminution (P<0.01). Isolated lateral pins are preferable because of a better balance of a lower risk of nerve injury and comparable fixation strength. Limitations such as differences in experimental setup among recruited studies and small sample size may compromise the methodologic power of this study.

A new joystick technique for unsuccessful closed reduction of supracondylar humeral fractures: minimum trauma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare operation duration, radiological and functional results of the open reduction with either posterior or lateral approach and closed reduction with joystick method in unsuccessful closed reduction of displaced (Gartland type III) supracondylar humeral fractures.

METHODS

Between February 2010 and August 2011, 37 patients who were not obtained satisfactory reduction with classic closed reduction attempts for three times in operating room were included in this study. Patients were treated with three different surgical methods. Group I have 13 patients who had joystick and lateral K-wire-assisted closed reduction, group II have 12 patients who had open reduction by lateral approach, and group III have 12 patients who had open reduction by posterior approach. In final follow-up, AP and lateral radiographs of both elbows were taken and bilateral Baumann angles, lateral humerocapitellar angles, carrying angles, and elbow range of motion were measured. These angles and operation times compared between the groups. The functional and cosmetic outcome of surgery was evaluated by criteria of Flynn et al.

RESULTS

There was no statistical significance difference between Baumann angles, lateral humerocapitellar angles, and carrying angles of fractured and uninjured sides in between three groups (respectively, p = 0.761, p = 0.354, p = 0.750). In group I, operation duration is shorter than the other groups. Functional scoring showed that in group I and group II, all patients have satisfactory results; however, in group III, three patients (25%) had poor results. In the perspective of cosmetic results, all three groups have satisfactory results.

CONCLUSIONS

When classical closed reduction fail, lateral joystick and K-wire-assisted reduction is a useful way to make and maintain the reduction. Functional and radiological results are as good as lateral and posterior open approaches. Short operation time is an advantage. This method reduces the risk of complications due to repeated closed reduction and open reduction in unsuccessful closed reduction in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: effect of bone-implant interface conditions on fracture stability

BACKGROUND

Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires (KWs) is the standard of care of pediatric supra-condylar humerus fractures (SCHFs). Failure modes leading to loss of reduction are not clear and have not been quantified. Multiple factors may weaken the KW-bone interface bonding conditions. To the best of our knowledge, the possible effect of this decrease on different KW configurations and fracture stability has never been studied.

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of bone-KW friction conditions on SCHF post-operative mechanical stability and to formulate clinical guidelines for KW configuration under different conditions.

METHODS

Finite element-based model of a fixated SCHF was used to simulate structure stability for two lateral divergent versus crossed lateral and medial KW configurations under varying KW-bone friction conditions.

RESULTS

Finite element simulations demonstrated that crossed KWs provide superior stability compared with the divergent configuration when KW-bone bonding is compromised. When KW-bone bonding conditions are adequate, crossed and divergent KW configurations provide similar, sufficient fracture stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Under normal bone-implant interface conditions, the two diverging lateral KW configuration offers satisfactory mechanical stability and may be the preferred choice of SCHF fixation. When KW-bone bonding is suboptimal, as when one or more of the lateral KWs are re-drilled, addition of a medial KW should be considered in order to improve stability despite risk to ulnar nerve.

Ultrasound evaluation of ulnar nerve anatomy in the pediatric population

BACKGROUND

Ulnar nerve instability has been reported in up to 17% of children. Accurate assessment is important to achieve because of potential nerve complications that can arise from treatment of common pediatric fractures, including supracondylar humerus fractures. The objective of our study was to evaluate our ability to use ultrasonography to determine the extent of ulnar nerve dislocation in the normal pediatric population and to determine if there is a relationship between ulnar nerve instability and ligamentous laxity.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective ultrasound evaluation of 51 children, examining the excursion of the ulnar nerve through full range of motion. On the basis of its movement during flexion, the ulnar nerve was categorized as stable, subluxating, or dislocating. In addition, we assessed all subjects for ligamentous laxity using the Wynne-Davies signs of joint laxity. The subjects were then divided into groups based on age or ligamentous laxity, and statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Most of the elbows evaluated had stable ulnar nerves (64/102, 62.7%), 27.5% (28/102) had subluxating nerves, and 9.8% (10/102) had dislocating nerves. Patients aged between 6 and 10 showed the highest rate of dislocating or subluxating nerves, with 50%, and also the highest average laxity score, 2.0. When grouped according to ligamentous laxity, patients who had multiple signs of ligamentous laxity had statistically higher numbers of subluxating and dislocating nerves (91.6%, 11/12) than those with lower laxity scores (25.6%, 10/39).

CONCLUSIONS

There are a substantial number of subluxating or dislocating ulnar nerves in children, and the incidence is often bilateral. Patients with ligamentous laxity are more likely to possess unstable ulnar nerves. Ultrasound evaluation and assessment of ligamentous laxity are additional tools that can be used to assess elbow anatomy and identify children at risk for iatrogenic nerve injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Medial and lateral crossed pinning versus lateral pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: decision analysis

BACKGROUND

The choice of pinning techniques in supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children has been a debate regarding its fixation stability and risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy. This study was performed to determine as to which fixating method (medial and lateral crossed pinning vs. lateral pinning) is better for the displaced supracondylar fractures using a decision analysis tool in terms of function.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was designed containing the probability of iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy and malunion caused by unstable fixation for each of lateral pinning and medial and lateral crossed pinning techniques. The final outcome was function adjusted life year and used as a utility in the decision tree, where function was evaluated using the McBride disability evaluation. The probabilities of all cases were obtained by literature review and assumptions. A roll back tool was used to determine the better pinning technique, and sensitivity analysis was performed to compensate for the uncertainty of the model.

RESULTS

Overall, our decision model favored the lateral pinning technique over the medial and lateral crossed pinning with the utilities of 99.6 and 99.3 in terms of function adjusted life year. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the threshold rate of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury as a complication after medial and lateral crossed pinning was 0.7%, below which the model favored medial and lateral crossed pinning over lateral pinning. The decision model was found to be sensitive to the percentage of permanent ulnar nerve palsy after medial and lateral crossed pinning. Two-way sensitivity analysis showed that the lateral pinning technique was more beneficial than the medial and lateral crossed pinning technique.

CONCLUSIONS

In our decision analysis model, the lateral pinning technique was found to be more beneficial than the medial and lateral crossed pinning technique for supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children, on the basis of current evidences. However, the results were sensitive to the data of ulnar nerve injury. Avoiding the worst clinical scenario (permanent ulnar nerve palsy) might be more important and affordable than obtaining favorable clinical results (stable fixation) at the potential cost of disastrous complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ulnar nerve injury may occur after pinning of supracondylar fractures in children. We describe the outcome and compare the rates of iatrogenic injuries to the ulnar nerve in a consecutive series of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children treated with either crossed pinning or antegrade nailing.

METHODS

Medical charts of all children sustaining this fracture treated at our department between 1994 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed regarding the mode of treatment, demographic data including age and sex, the time until implant removal, the outcome, and the rate of ulnar nerve injuries.

RESULTS

503 children (55% boys) with an average age of 6.5 years sustained a type-II, type-III, or type-IV supracondylar fracture. Of those, 440 children were included in the study. Antegrade nailing was performed in 264 (60%) of the children, and the others were treated with crossed pins. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury occurred in 0.4% of the children treated with antegrade nailing and in 15% of the children treated with crossed pinning. After median 3 (1.6-12) years of follow-up, the clinical outcome was good and similar between the 2 groups.

INTERPRETATION

Intramedullary antegrade nailing of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures can be considered an adequate and safe alternative to the widely performed crossed K-wire fixation. The risk of iatrogenic nerve injury after antegrade nailing is small compared to that after crossed pinning.

Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after the surgical treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus: number needed to harm, a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are common pediatric elbow injuries. Most displaced or angulated fractures are treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, with either a crossed pin or lateral pin configuration. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine if there is an increased risk of iatrogenic nerve injury associated with the crossed pin configuration.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified by searching electronic databases and hand searching-related journal and conference proceedings. Within each trial, the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury was calculated for each pinning technique. For studies comparing crossed versus lateral pinning, the resulting trial-based differences in risk estimates were pooled using a random effects meta-analysis. A number needed to harm was determined using the pooled risk difference.

RESULTS

Thirty-two trials consisting of 2639 patients were used in the pooled analysis. The pooled risk difference of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury is 0.035 (95% confidence interval, 0.014-0.056), with a higher incidence of injury in the crossed pinning group. The weighed number needed to harm for the crossed pinning is 28 (95% confidence interval, 17-71).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review suggest that there is an iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury for every 28 patients treated with the crossed pinning compared with the lateral pinning. Further research is necessary to ensure that the optimal pinning technique is chosen to treat these factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Closed reduction and stabilization of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: the crucial factor of surgical experience

We reviewed the outcome following operative management of displaced (Gartland II and III) supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children over a 2-year period and tried to correlate the outcome with various factors including experience of the treating surgeon. Of the 71 children who formed the study group, 62 (87.3%) had a good outcome irrespective of the treatment modality. Closed reduction followed by plaster immobilization or percutaneous pinning resulted in a better outcome than open reduction. There was a direct involvement of the consultant in the primary management of these injuries in 17 cases (24%), none of which had a poor outcome. Of the 54 cases in whom the primary management was carried out independently by trainees without any consultant supervision, nine patients (17%) developed complications or needed reoperations. The proportion of unsatisfactory outcomes increased to 20.3% when failure to achieve a satisfactory reduction by closed means was also considered as a perioperative complication. There is a learning curve associated with percutaneous pinning after closed reduction and experience of the surgeon seems to be one of the factors that have an influence on the outcome.

Nerve injuries associated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are the most common type of elbow fracture in children. Of all complications associated with supracondylar fractures, nerve injury ranks highest, although reports of the incidence of specific neurapraxia vary. This meta-analysis aims primarily to determine the risk of traumatic neurapraxia in extension-type supracondylar fractures as compared with that of flexion-type fractures; secondarily it aims to use subgroup analysis to assess the risk of iatrogenic neurapraxia induced by pin fixation.

METHODS

A literature search identified studies that reported the incidence of nerve injury presenting with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Meta-analysis was subsequently performed to evaluate the risk of traumatic neurapraxia associated with supracondylar fractures. Subgroup analysis of included articles was additionally performed to assess the risk of iatrogenic neurapraxia associated with lateral-only or medial/lateral pin fixation.

RESULTS

Data from 5148 patients with 5154 fractures were pooled for meta-analysis. Among these patients, traumatic neurapraxia occurred at a weighted event rate of 11.3%. Anterior interosseous nerve injury predominated in extension-type fractures, representing 34.1% of associated neurapraxias; meanwhile, ulnar neuropathy occurred most frequently in flexion-type injuries, representing 91.3% of associated neurapraxias. Nerve injury induced by lateral-only pinning occurred at a weighted event rate of 3.4%, while the introduction of a medial pin elicited neurapraxia at a weighted event rate of 4.1%. Lateral pinning carried increased risk of median neuropathy, whereas the use of a medial pin significantly increased the risk of ulnar nerve injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Of nerve injury associated with extension-type fractures, anterior interosseous neurapraxia ranks highest, whereas of flexion-type neuropathy, ulnar nerve injury predominates. We confirm that medial pinning carries the greater overall risk of nerve injury as compared with lateral-only pinning and that the ulnar nerve is at risk of injury in medially pinned patients. We additionally suggest that lateral pinning carries neurapraxic risk with respect to the median nerve.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Meta-analysis.

Complications after pinning of supracondylar distal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar distal humerus fractures are one of the most common skeletal injuries in children. The current treatment of choice in North America is closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. Often surgeons leave the pins exposed beneath a cast but outside the skin. Great variation exists with respect to preoperative skin preparation, and perioperative antibiotic administration. Few data exist regarding the rate of infection and other complications. The purpose of this study is to review a large series of children to evaluate the rate of infection and other complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out of all patients treated at our institution over an 11-year period. A total of 622 patients were identified that were followed for a minimum of 2 weeks after pin removal. Seventeen patients had flexion-type fractures, 294 had type II fractures, and 311 had type III fractures. Seventy-four fractures (11.9%) had preoperative nerve deficits with anterior interosseous palsies being the most common (33 fractures, 5.3%). Preoperative antibiotics were given to 163 patients (26.2%). Spray and towel draping were used in 362 patients, paint and towel draping were used in 65 patients, alcohol paint and towel draping were used in 146 patients, and a full preparation and draping were used in 13 patients. The pins were left exposed under the cast in 591 fractures (95%), and buried beneath the skin in 31 fractures (5.0%). A medial pin was placed in 311 fractures with a small incision made to aid placement in 18 of these cases.

RESULTS

The most common complication was pin migration necessitating unexpected return to the operating room for pin removal in 11 patients (1.8%). One patient developed a deep infection with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis (0.2%). Five additional patients had superficial skin infections and were treated with oral antibiotics for a total infection rate of 6 of 622 patients (1.0%). One patient ultimately had a malunion and 4 others returned to the operating room for repeat reduction and pinning. Three patients developed compartment syndromes. Ulnar nerve injury was rare with only 1 postoperative ulnar nerve injury occurring in 311 patients treated with a medial pin (0.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Closed reduction with percutaneous pinning is effective and has a low complication rate with a very low rate of infection even when simple betadine preparation and towel draping are used. Preoperative antibiotics seem to have little effect on infection rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective comparative study.

Children distal humerus supracondylar fractures: the Blount Method experience

INTRODUCTION

Extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children are frequent lesions whose orthopaedic treatment remains under debate in Rigault and Lagrange type III fractures and highly controversial in type IV fractures. The objective of this study was to extend the Blount method to fractures with substantial displacement even in patients presenting significant swelling and to evaluate the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective continuous study from December 2005 to August 2007 on 67 children: 49 boys and 18 girls with a mean age of 6 years (range, 3-14 years). The mean time lapsed from consultation to treatment was 30 h. The mean hospital stay was 72 h. In 50 children, the limb was elevated preoperatively for a mean 48 h. The fracture was reduced under fluoroscopy-guided general anesthesia with mask and immobilized with 5-cm cloth banding padded with foam. The follow-up was clinical and radiological. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range, 6-26 months). Assessment followed the 1969 SOFCOT guidelines.

RESULTS

At union, mean flexion was 124 degrees , the mean extension lag was 26 degrees . At last follow-up, the mean flexion was 146 degrees , the extension lag was 0.5 degrees , and pronation and supination were free. Immediately after surgery, the mean Baumann and anteflexion angles were 75 degrees and 43 degrees , respectively; at union they were 76 degrees and 44 degrees and at follow-up 79 degrees and 42 degrees . We found no vascular or nerve lesions. According to the SOFCOT criteria, at follow-up we obtained 80.6% very good results and 19.4% good results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Therapeutic study.

Treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures among children: crossed versus lateral pinning

This retrospective study evaluated different pinning configurations used in the treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures among children, mainly regarding maintenance of fracture reduction and avoidance of complications. The fractures (41 type II and 67 type III) of 108 children (mean age 6.48 years) were treated by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning: 37 with crossed pins, 37 with two lateral pins and 34 with two lateral and one medial pin. Mean follow-up period was 7.4 months. Type III fractures fixed by two lateral pins were found significantly prone to postoperative instability, late complications and need for medial pin fixation. There was a significant relation between either delay to surgery or postoperative instability and occurrence of complications. Final outcome was significantly poorer in type III than in type II fractures. Fixation by two lateral pins only is not recommended for treating type III supracondylar humeral fractures, but could be used initially to fix severely unstable fractures to allow extension of the elbow before inserting a medial pin. Every effort should be made to avoid iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury while inserting the medial pin.

Operative management of type III extension supracondylar fractures in children

The purpose of this study was to compare primarily open versus primarily closed surgical treatment of Gartland type III extension supracondylar fractures in children. Also the outcomes of different pinning techniques in open surgery were evaluated retrospectively. Eighty displaced type III extension supracondylar fractures treated consecutively at two different centres were included. The treatment protocol of one institute was primarily closed reduction and percutaneous cross-pinning (n = 43). The treatment protocol of the other institute was primarily open reduction and internal fixation (n = 37) with two lateral parallel pins (n = 11), cross pins (n = 11) and two lateral and one medial pin (n = 15) according to the stability and configuration of the fracture. According to Flynn's criteria the outcomes of the open and closed reduction groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Although the outcomes of closed reduction showed no superiority over open reduction, it should be the first choice of treatment due to its low morbidity and short hospital stay.