Natural progression of hip dysplasia in newborns: a reflection of hip ultrasonographic screenings in newborn nurseries

Does This Infant Have a Dislocated Hip?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review

Importance

Delayed diagnosis of a dislocated hip in infants can lead to complex childhood surgery, interruption to family life, and premature osteoarthritis.

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination in identifying dislocated hips in infants.

Data Sources

Systematic search of CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library from the inception of each database until October 31, 2023.

Study Selection

The 9 included studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination (index test) in infants aged 3 months or younger and a diagnostic hip ultrasound (reference test). The Graf method of ultrasound assessment was used to classify hip abnormalities.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Rational Clinical Examination scale was used to assign levels of evidence and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to assess bias. Data were extracted using the individual hip as the unit of analysis; the data were pooled when the clinical examinations were evaluated by 3 or more of the included studies.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) of identifying a dislocated hip were calculated.

Results

Among infants screened with a clinical examination and a diagnostic ultrasound in 5 studies, the prevalence of a dislocated hip (n = 37 859 hips) was 0.94% (95% CI, 0.28%-2.0%). There were 8 studies (n = 44 827 hips) that evaluated use of the Barlow maneuver and the Ortolani maneuver (dislocate and relocate an unstable hip); the maneuvers had a sensitivity of 46% (95% CI, 26%-67%), a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 97.9%-99.6%), a positive LR of 52 (95% CI, 21-127), and a negative LR of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.37-0.82). There were 3 studies (n = 22 472 hips) that evaluated limited hip abduction and had a sensitivity of 13% (95% CI, 3.3%-37%), a specificity of 97% (95% CI, 87%-99%), a positive LR of 3.6 (95% CI, 0.72-18), and a negative LR of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.76-1.1). One study (n = 13 096 hips) evaluated a clicking sound and had a sensitivity of 13% (95% CI, 6.4%-21%), a specificity of 92% (95% CI, 92%-93%), a positive LR of 1.6 (95% CI, 0.91-2.8), and a negative LR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88-1.0).

Conclusions and Relevance

In studies in which all infant hips were screened for developmental dysplasia of the hip, the prevalence of a dislocated hip was 0.94%. A positive LR for the Barlow and Ortolani maneuvers was the finding most associated with an increased likelihood of a dislocated hip. Limited hip abduction or a clicking sound had no clear diagnostic utility.

Application of Accepted Use Criteria for the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Decreases the Number of Infants Treated With a Pavlik Harness

BACKGROUND

This analysis examined how the application of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons appropriate use criteria (AUC) for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants would change treatment patterns and outcomes for Graf IIA hips at a single quaternary pediatric hospital.

METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, patient medical records were reviewed and data were collected. Graf IIa hips were defined as alpha angle (AA) 50 to 59 degrees. AA and femoral head coverage (FHC) were measured from initial and 6-month ultrasounds and acetabular index (AI) was measured from radiographs at 6 months of age. Instability (positive Ortolani and Barlow tests) was noted. On the basis of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons AUC for managing developmental dysplasia of the hip, hips were further categorized as normal (FHC ≥45%), borderline (FHC 35% to 44%), or dysplastic (FHC <35%).

RESULTS

Overall, 13% (49/371) of Graf IIa hips (AA 50 to 59 degrees) were dysplastic (FHC <35%). Total 24% (89/371) were clinically unstable. Total 42% (37/89) of unstable Graf IIa hips were dysplastic. Only 4% of stable Graf IIa hips were dysplastic (12/282). Out of 371 Graf IIa hips, 256 were treated with Pavlik harness (n=250) or Rhino brace (n=6). Among stable, nondysplastic (SND) hips (those with normal and borderline FHC≥35%), 33% (52/158) were treated because of a more severe contralateral side. If the AUC had been applied, 67% (106/158) of SND Graf IIa hips would not have been treated. Among the n=162 hips that returned for a 6-month radiograph, there was no difference in AI in the 115 treated and 47 untreated SND hips (mean difference treatment vs. no treatment: -1.5, 95% CI, -3.1 to 0.2, P =0.0808).

CONCLUSIONS

Using AUC recommendations, our center could reduce the number of SND Graf IIa hips we treat by 67%. Although 24% of Graf IIa hips were clinically unstable and 13% were dysplastic based on FHC, most Graf IIa hips had normal or borderline FHC per the AUC and may do well with observation and follow-up ultrasound at 12 weeks old.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-diagnostic study.

Cost Analysis of Screening Programmes for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess screening costs in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), to provide any clarity on the cost-effectiveness of various hip screening programmes internationally.

METHODS

A PROSPERO-registered systematic review was performed by examining cost analysis studies of various DDH screening programmes, including those based around clinical examination, selective ultrasound and universal ultrasound. Costs were analysed using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

There were 14 studies included in this review. Two studies found that clinical hip screening is advantageous over no screening at all, both in terms of overall cost and favourable outcomes. When considering selective ultrasound imaging versus clinical screening, two studies found it to be more expensive, one found it cheaper and three studies calculated the overall programme costs to be similar. With universal ultrasound, four studies calculated this to be cheaper than clinical or selective ultrasound screening due to a reduced late detection and surgery rate. However, a comparable number of studies concluded that the increased financial costs of universal ultrasound were greater than the reduction in surgical costs. No studies included any long-term data.

CONCLUSION

There is a dearth of information on DDH screening costs, with significant heterogeneity amongst the existing literature. Future research should include the cost analysis of long-term complications of DDH, including the social and psychological impact of early onset arthritis, as well as gender specific ultrasound screening programmes.

Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip after 4 weeks increases exam accuracy and decreases follow-up visits

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a preventable and treatable disorder in children. Hip ultrasound is recommended for early detection of affected hips. The timing of the initial hip ultrasound and the frequency of subsequent ultrasounds are controversial topics when considering costs and efficiency.

METHODS

Registry data from the Taiwanese Screening and Audit System for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip were obtained for biometry of hip ultrasounds using the Graf classification and relevant demographic data from 2016. Initial screening results and final case management outcomes were compared to determine screening accuracy and the number of visits needed to determine final outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, we screened 1683 newborns in 2016. Of the initial cases screened within 28 days (n = 1168), 86.6% were negative, 10.1% positive, and 3.3% intermediate, while of the cases screened after 28 days (n = 515), 97.3% were negative, 0.8% positive, and 1.9% intermediate. Screening of the newborns' final hip outcomes revealed that 1641 (97.6%) were negative, treatment was administered in 8 cases (0.4%), and 34 (2.0%) cases were lost to follow-up. When comparing screening times, screening after 28 days improved specificity (89%-97%), and later screenings were associated with fewer visits needed to confirm hip outcomes (aOR = 0.19, CI95% = 0.10-0.38, p < 0.001) and improved accuracy (aOR = 13.84, CI95% = 4.23-45.26, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence of the benefits of screening for DDH after 28 days, namely: reduced false positives, improved screening accuracy, and a reduced requirement for follow-up visits. Delaying screening can also potentially reduce unnecessary parental anxiety, eliminate unnecessary healthcare burdens, and reduce costs. We recommend performing hip ultrasound screening for newborns after 28 days.

The natural history of abnormal ultrasound findings in hips of infants under six months of age

PURPOSE

To collect and describe data on the natural history of abnormal ultrasound (US) findings in hips of infants under six months of age to serve as a reference to the design of screening programmes and treatment algorithms in the care for children with hip dysplasia.

METHODS

A search in PubMed of the terms "DDH" and "ultrasound" was done to find hips with abnormal US findings that were not treated. In cases of multiple periods of follow-up, the classification of every period was evaluated separately (individual hip follow-up periods).

RESULTS

Data of 13 561 hips with 16 991 follow-up periods were collected and analyzed. Most quantifiable classifications and follow-up periods were according to Graf (14 876) and a minor number of the hips had follow-up periods with femoral head coverage (FHC) (2115). Normal development without treatment in the first six months was for Graf 2a between 89% and 98%, for Graf 2c between 80% and 100% and for clustered data Graf 2a to 2c between 80% and 97%. For Graf 3 hips more than 50% were reported to develop into normal hips without treatment. As for Graf 4 hips this percentage was reported below 50%. For children with an FHC less than 50%, normalization was reported between 78% and 100%.

CONCLUSION

The natural history of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) shows a benign course, especially in the well-centered hips. This outcome probably contributes to the fact that all studies on US screening of hips for detection of relevant DDH in order to improve outcomes of treatment are rated as substantially underpowered.

Prevalence of different hip sonographic types: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is an anatomical abnormality, which needs early detection and treatment. Ultrasound (US) is a sensitive method to study neonatal hip joint and detection of different types of sonographic hip. This study was aimed to determine relative frequency of different types of DDH ultrasonographically.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ultrasound examination was performed on 380 newborns to determine hip joint status according to the Graf ultrasound classification system for infant hips. In addition, hip joint status was compared based on the hip side, gender, and method of delivery.

RESULTS

In this study, we observed three sonographic types: Ia (74%), type Ib (20%), and IIa (6%). No significant difference was found in relative frequency of different types of DDH regarding the side of the hip (P = 0.18). Type IIa was found significantly more in the female newborns (P < 0.0001) and in newborns who were born by cesarean section (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the role of US detection of different types of DDH; however, the frequency of pathologic types of hip sonography is 6%.

Is it worthwhile to screen the hip in infants born with clubfeet?

PURPOSE

There is some disagreement about whether idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) increases the risk of neonatal developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of DDH in our infants with idiopathic CTEV.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study over a three-year period to assess the relationship between idiopathic CTEV and DDH. All neonates younger than six weeks with idiopathic CTEV who were treated in our medical centre were admitted to this study. Each subject underwent hip ultrasound examination using the Graf method at the age of six weeks. DDH was diagnosed when a hip was type IIa(-) or worse according to the Graf classification of sonographic hip type.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were diagnosed with idiopathic CTEV and underwent hip sonography. In total, seven hips of five individuals underwent treatment (four girls and one boy). The results indicated that 2.7% of babies (five of 184) with idiopathic CTEV had DDH. However, we did not find any statistically significant difference (p = 0.5776) in the Pirani scores between the DDH group and group with normal hips.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the idiopathic CTEV group had a greater incidence of DDH in comparison with the general population. It is recommended that hip sonography be undertaken particularly in patients with idiopathic CTEV.

Screening of selected risk factors in developmental dysplasia of the hip: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common neonatal musculoskeletal condition. In 2008, the NHS Newborn and Infant Physical Examination committee added selective 'at risk' screening to the existing universal neonatal and general practitioner clinical hip screening guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of breech and family history risk factors in DDH.

DESIGN

A 15 year prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study.

METHOD

Breech presentation and evidence of a strong family history for DDH were the 'risk factors' studied. All infants referred were clinically and sonographically screened by one consultant paediatric orthopaedic surgeon.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 64 670 live births, 2984 neonates/infants, 46.1 (95% CI 44.6 to 47.8) per 1000 live births, were referred and sonographically screened with these risk factors alone. 1360 were male, of which four were identified as having 'pathological' DDH (an incidence of 0.003 (95% CI 0.001 to 0.008)). 1624 were female, of which 45 were identified as having 'pathological' DDH (an incidence of 0.028 (95% CI 0.021 to 0.037)). This difference in incidence of 0.025 (95% CI 0.016 to 0.033) was statistically significant (p<0.001). From those who were clinically stable and screened with either or both of the two risk factors, four individuals were diagnosed with irreducible hip dislocation (0.06 (95% CI 0.024 to 0.159) per 1000 live births). All were females.

CONCLUSIONS

This study questions the current UK screening policy for DDH in clinically stable males referred with risk factors, and may influence future DDH screening programme policy.