Utility of Postoperative Antibiotics After Percutaneous Pinning of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection Rates in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Treated with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) are the most common elbow fracture in the pediatric population. In the case of displaced fractures, closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning (CRPP) is commonly performed. Infection rates are between 0 and 7%; however, retrospective studies have shown no benefit of preoperative antibiotics. There continues to be notable variability in antibiotic usage based on surgeon preference and local institutional policy. We conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of infection in pediatric SCHF patients treated with CRPP.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with displaced SCHF who presented to a pediatric hospital were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Group I received one dose of prophylactic antibiotics (25 mg/kg cefazolin IV up to 1g or clindamycin 10 mg/kg up to 600 mg/kg IV in the case of cefazolin allergy). Group II received placebo (10-mL prefilled syringe of normal saline). All patients underwent CRPP and casting followed by pin removal 3 to 6 weeks after the initial procedure. The presence of pin-site infection, erythema, drainage, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis was recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in the study. Eighty-two patients were randomized to receive antibiotics, and 78 patients were randomized to placebo. No difference was seen in the rate of infection between the treatment groups (1.2% in the antibiotic group versus 1.3% in the placebo group; P = 1.00). Presence of purulent drainage (0.0% versus 1.3%; P = 0.49), septic arthritis (0.0% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00), and osteomyelitis (1.2% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00) was similar in both groups. No difference in the need for additional antibiotics (1.2% versus 1.3%; P = 1.00) or additional surgery (1.2% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00) was found between groups.

DISCUSSION

The use of antibiotic prophylaxis did not affect the risk of infection in pediatric patients who underwent CRPP for displaced SCHF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261830.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I.

Recurrent Infections After Percutaneous Pinning of a Proximal Radius and Ulna Fracture

Elbow fractures in the pediatric population are an exceedingly common injury, comprising 5% to 10% of all pediatric fractures, with supracondylar fractures being the most common of the subset. Radial neck fractures are less frequent, comprising only 1% of all pediatric fractures. We provide a case report of a 7-year-old girl with a left radial neck and proximal ulna fracture. A 7-year-old girl presented to the emergency department after falling off a rock wall the day before. Imaging showed a left proximal ulna and proximal radial neck fracture. The patient underwent percutaneous reduction and fixation, complicated by subsequent infection requiring surgical débridement. The patient then developed a recurrent infection 1 year later, requiring repeat irrigation and débridement. The patient has since made a full recovery, returned to activities of daily living, and regained a full range of motion. Radial neck fractures have a low incidence and have been frequently associated with poor outcomes. The main mechanism by which these fractures occur is due to falling on an outstretched arm. Percutaneous pinning is often recommended after unsuccessful attempts at closed reduction because open reduction is often complicated by postoperative stiffness. As with any procedure that involves breaking the skin, there is a risk of infection. However, there is unclear evidence regarding ideal perioperative management to prevent postoperative infection.

Peri-operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in K-Wire Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

There are currently no standardised guidelines on whether antibiotic prophylaxis is required for Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation to minimise the risk of surgical site infection when used in patients undergoing clean orthopaedic surgery.

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of antibiotic prophylaxis versus no antibiotic in K-wire fixation when used in either in trauma or elective orthopaedics.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines and a search of electronic information was conducted to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies comparing the outcomes of antibiotic prophylaxis group versus those without antibiotic in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in which K-wire fixation was used. Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) was the primary outcome. Random effects modelling was used for the analysis.

Results

Four retrospective cohort studies and one RCT were identified with a total of 2316 patients. There was no significant difference between the prophylactic antibiotic and no antibiotic groups in terms of incidence of SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, P = 0.18).

Conclusions

There is no significant difference in administering peri-operative antibiotics for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery using K-wire.

Correction of Cubitus Varus Using Computer-Assisted Hexapod Multiplanar External Fixators: A Report of 3 Cases

CASE

Three male patients, 8-, 13-, and 18-year-old, all developed posttraumatic cubitus varus elbow deformity after distal humerus supracondylar fractures. Each underwent a distal humerus osteotomy with application of a hexapod external fixator to gradually correct the deformity.

CONCLUSION

In patients with cubitus varus malunion, the stability of the hexapod external fixation, percutaneous nature of the osteotomy, and availability of running a residual computer-assisted program provides a consistent technique for deformity correction.

The Frequency and Outcomes of Nerve Palsies in Operatively Treated Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

BACKGROUND

A high index of suspicion for nerve palsy is essential in the setting of a displaced supracondylar humerus fracture (SCHF) with careful attention to the examination. We hypothesize that nerve injuries are more prevalent in higher energy type III and flexion SCHFs compared with type II fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 1085 operatively treated SCHFs in pediatric patients, aged 0 to 14 years, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. There were 979 patients eligible for analysis. Exclusion criteria included follow-up <3 weeks, polytrauma, pathologic fracture, and prior fracture of the ipsilateral elbow.

RESULTS

The overall rate of nerve injury was 10.6% (104/979). A significant difference in the rate of nerve palsy was identified between fracture types: 0.9% type II, 19.3% type III, and 10.7% flexion type SCHFs ( P <0.001). Median nerve palsy was the most common (n=65). An increased rate of ulnar nerve palsy was observed in flexion type SCHFs. The rate of nerve palsy was higher in the medial pin group (14.9%, P =0.035) but no significant association with iatrogenic ulnar nerve palsy was present. In type III and flexion SCHFs, operative time >60 minutes ( P =0.023) and the need for open reduction ( P =0.012) were significantly associated with postoperative nerve palsy. Referral to therapy was required in 30.8% of patients with a nerve palsy compared with 7.9% of patients without ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Longer operative times, need for open reduction, and significantly higher rates of nerve palsy among type III and flexion SCHFs are best explained by the unstable nature of the fracture and greater degree of soft tissue trauma. Given prolonged duration of follow-up and more frequent need for therapy demonstrated in patients with a nerve palsy, these data can be used to improve counseling for families and patients after displaced SCHF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Hold the Antibiotics: Are Preoperative Antibiotics Unnecessary in the Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fracture is the most common elbow injury in children and often treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). There is little published evidence supporting or refuting the use of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics for SCH CRPP in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of surgical site infection for patients with and without preoperative antibiotics.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients less than or equal to 16 years from 2012 to 2018 who underwent primary CRPP. Open fractures, multilimbed polytraumas, and immunodeficient patients were excluded. Infection rates were compared using a noninferiority test assuming a 3% infection rate and a predefined noninferiority margin of 4%. A total of 255 patients were needed to adequately power the study.

RESULTS

Of the 1253 cases identified, 845 met eligibility criteria. A total of 337 received antibiotics, and 508 did not. Preoperative nerve injury (P=0.0244) and sterilization technique (P<0.0001) were associated with antibiotic use: 4 patients developed an infection; there were successfully treated superficial infections, and 1 was a deep infection requiring a formal debridement. There were 8 patients that had a recorded mal-union, and 6 patients required additional procedures; 1 patient had a postoperative compartment syndrome on postoperation day 1. The infection rates among patients treated with and without antibiotics were 0.60% and 0.40%, respectively. The absence of antibiotics was not clinically inferior to using antibiotics (P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection remains a rare complication following CRPP of SCH fractures. According to our current data, not giving perioperative antibiotics was not inferior to using perioperative antibiotics for preventing superficial or deep infection in patients undergoing CRPP of SCH fractures. With the increase in attention to antibiotic stewardship, it is important to eliminate unnecessary antibiotic use while continuing to maintain a low rate of surgical site infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series. This is a therapeutic study that investigates the results from a case series.

Efficacy of Antibiotics in Supracondylar Fractures

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists surrounding antibiotic use in the setting of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. While the reported incidence of infection in the literature is low, surgeons frequently administer preoperative antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review preoperative antibiotic use and incidence of infection in children with supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and K-wire fixation. It was hypothesized that antibiotic administration will not affect the incidence of infection following this procedure.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 1053 patients with supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and K-wire fixation at 3 institutions between 2006 and 2016. Patient demographics, antibiotic administration and follow-up data were reviewed in 905 patients.

RESULTS

Of 905 patients, 755 patients received preoperative antibiotics and 150 patients did not. The incidence of infection was 2.5% (n=22) in the group that received preoperative antibiotics and 2.0% in the group that did not receive antibiotics with an overall incidence of infection of 2.4%. The difference between groups did not reach significance (P>0.5). The majority of infections were treated with oral antibiotics with or without early pin removal. Four patients, all in the preoperative antibiotic group, required surgical debridement and intravenous antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrospective review of the incidence of infection in closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures found no difference between patients who received preoperative antibiotics and those who did not receive preoperative antibiotics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic.

The Safety and Benefits of the Semisterile Technique for Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning of Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures

Background: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) is traditionally performed following full surgical prep and draping. The semisterile technique utilizes minimal prep and draping, which was proven to be a viable alternative when treating pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and benefits of the semisterile technique for CRPP of pediatric upper extremity fractures. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric patients who underwent CRPP of an upper extremity fracture over a 4-year period. Demographic data, fracture type/location, and the type of prep technique (full-prep vs semisterile) were recorded. Qualities of intraoperative care were assessed, and postoperative care parameters were compared. Patient outcomes for the 2 techniques were compared using bivariate analyses. Results: In total, 219 patient records were reviewed including 160 in the semisterile group and 59 in the full-prep group. When comparing intraoperative parameters between the full-prep and semisterile techniques, the average room setup time was similar (20.6 vs 18.8 minutes, P = .52). However, the procedure times (32.1 vs 26.9 minutes, P = .04) were significantly shorter in the semisterile group. Nearly a 10-minute decrease in total time in the operating room was present while utilizing the semisterile technique (62.8 vs 53.6 minutes, P < .01). There were no statistical differences in complication rates between prep groups (P = .31), and there were no infections while utilizing the semisterile technique. Conclusions: The semisterile technique is a safe and efficient alternative that may be used when performing CRPP of pediatric upper extremity fractures.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Septic Arthritis and Osteomyelitis after Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning of a Supracondylar Humerus Fracture: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Infectious complications of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures are exceedingly rare. Although postoperative Pseudomonas infection is a feared complication associated with noncompliance and a wet cast, there are no reports in the literature of this occurring. We present the devastating complication of a pediatric patient who developed Pseudomonas aeruginosa subperiosteal abscess, osteomyelitis, and elbow septic arthritis after presenting to the clinic multiple times with a wet cast after closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a supracondylar humerus fracture. We describe the treatment course for this patient, followed by the sequelae of posterolateral rotary instability. This case not only confirms that patients can get Pseudomonas infections if they get their cast wet but also stresses the importance of patient communication and compliance in preventing unfortunate complications.