Dynamic Splinting in Children and Adolescents With Stiffness After Knee Surgery

Arthrofibrosis of the knee in pediatric orthopedic surgery

Arthrofibrosis is a challenging complication associated with knee injuries in both children and adults. While much is known about managing arthrofibrosis in adults, it is necessary to understand its unique aspects and management strategies in the pediatric population. This paper provides an overview of arthrofibrosis in pediatric orthopedic surgery, focusing on its causes, implications, classifications, and management. This paper is a comprehensive review of the literature and existing research on arthrofibrosis in pediatric patients. Arthrofibrosis is characterized by excessive collagen production and adhesions, leading to restricted joint motion and pain. It is associated with an immune response and fibrosis within and around the joint. Arthrofibrosis can result from various knee injuries in pediatric patients, including tibial spine fractures, ACL and PCL injuries, and extra-articular procedures. Technical factors at the time of surgery play a role in the development of motion loss and should be addressed to minimize complications. Preventing arthrofibrosis through early physical therapy is recommended. Non-operative management, including dynamic splinting and serial casting, has shown some benefits. New pharmacologic approaches to lysis of adhesions have shown promise. Surgical interventions, consisting of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), can significantly improve motion and functional outcomes. Arthrofibrosis poses unique challenges in pediatric patients, demanding a nuanced approach that includes prevention, early intervention with non-operative means, and improvements in surgical techniques. Modern pharmacological interventions offer promise for the future. Customized interventions and research focused on pediatric patients are critical for optimal outcomes.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Lysis of Adhesions Are the Most Commonly Reported Treatments for Arthrofibrosis of the Knee After Arthroscopy or Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Both Pediatric and Adult Patients

Purpose

To systematically review the literature and provide a detailed summary of the current treatments and outcomes for arthrofibrosis following knee arthroscopy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to compare the treatment strategies in pediatric and adult populations.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in March 2022 using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Search terms consisted of variations of the following: ("arthrofibrosis" OR "stiffness" OR "stiff" OR "complications") AND ("arthroscopy" OR "arthroscop" OR "ACL" OR "anterior cruciate") AND ("treat" OR "care" OR "management" AND "knee"). The inclusion criteria were studies that were written in English, were published since 2000, and that reported outcomes of knee arthroscopy or ACLR for treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee. The study quality was assessed, and data about the patients and treatments were recorded. Treatments were compared between pediatric and adult patients.

Results

A total of 1,208 articles were identified in the initial search, 42 (3.48%) of which met eligibility criteria, involving treatment regimens for arthrofibrosis following knee arthroscopy or ACLR. Of the 42 studies included, 29 (69.0%) were reported data for adults and 13 (31.0%) reported data for pediatric patients. Thirty-nine studies (92.8%) discussed manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of adhesions (LOA) as treatment for arthrofibrosis of the knee, whereas 2 (4.8%) described the use of medications.

Conclusions

Within orthopaedic sports medicine literature, there is variability in the reported treatment options for arthrofibrosis of the knee. Most studies identified manipulation under anesthesia and/or LOA as the treatment among both adult and pediatric patients. Other variants include notchplasty, open posterior arthrolysis, total graft resection, removal of hardware with LOA, dynamic splinting, casting in extension, bracing, and medications.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia is Safe and Effective for Management of Early Postoperative Knee Arthrofibrosis in Adolescent Patients

BACKGROUND

Management of postoperative knee arthrofibrosis can be challenging and the preferred time for intervention remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early (<3 mo postoperatively) manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for the treatment of knee arthrofibrosis in adolescent patients. We hypothesized that early MUA could restore normal knee motion with a low complication rate and without the need for more invasive intervention.

METHODS

In a retrospective review, 57 patients who underwent MUA for postoperative knee arthrofibrosis were identified. The time between the index surgery and MUA as well as changes in range of motion (ROM) before and after MUA were analyzed. Descriptive statistics with median and interquartile range were used to analyze this non-parametric study cohort. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed to assess improvement in ROM over time. A P value <0.05 denoted statistical significance.

RESULTS

The median age of the cohort at time of MUA was 14.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12.9 to 17.6)]. 54.4% were male. Median time to MUA was 64 days (IQR 52 to 79) after index surgery. ROM before MUA was 90.0 degrees (IQR 75 to 100), which improved to 130 degrees (120 to 135) after MUA. At final median follow-up of 8.9 months (IQR 5.1 to 16.1), mean ROM was 133 degrees (130 to 140). There were no iatrogenic fractures or physeal separations associated with MUA. 12.3% (n=7/57) failed MUA either due to the need for subsequent repeat MUA (n=2), need for lysis of adhesions (n=3) or need for surgery after MUA (n=2). Those who failed early MUA and required subsequent procedures had ROM >120 degrees at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative knee arthrofibrosis can be safely and effectively treated with early (<3 mo postoperative) MUA. There were no iatrogenic fractures or physeal separations during MUA. Patients who had recurrence of motion deficits after early MUA and required further intervention, regained satisfactory knee motion at final follow-up. Although further research is warranted to better characterize risk factors for knee arthrofibrosis in adolescent patients, early recognition and MUA is a safe and effective treatment for arthrofibrosis to help patients regain full ROM without invasive intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Study - Level IV.

Mechanisms involved in the arthrofibrosis formation and treatments following bone fracture

Arthrofibrosis is a common complication for patients with bone fracture following external and internal fixation. In this review, we summarize the related factors and significant pathways for joint adhesion following fracture surgery. Moreover, the different types of treatments and related preventive measures are also discussed. Many factors related to the development and treatment of arthrofibrosis are discussed in this review in order to provide possible clues for the prospective targets to develop new medication or treatments for preventing or reducing the joint adhesion following orthopedic surgery.

Arthrofibrosis and large joint scarring

Large joint arthrofibrosis and scarring, involving the shoulder, elbow, hip, and knee, can result in the loss of function and immobility. The pathway of joint contracture formation is still being elucidated and is due to aberrations in collagen synthesis and misorientation of collagen fibrils. Novel antibodies are being developed to prevent arthrofibrosis, and current treatment methods for arthrofibrosis include medical, physical, and surgical treatments. This article describes the biology of joint contracture formation, along with current and future pharmacologic, biologic, and medical interventions.

Range of Motion Improvement Following Surgical Management of Knee Arthrofibrosis in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis of the knee is well-described in adults as a potentially debilitating postoperative complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, total knee arthroplasty, or fracture fixation. Knee arthrofibrosis in children and adolescents, however, has received little attention. The primary purpose of this study was to report improvements in range of motion (ROM) following lysis of adhesions and manipulation under anesthesia (LOA/MUA) in children and adolescents with knee arthrofibrosis, and, secondarily, to evaluate for any effect of preoperative dynamic splinting on ROM outcomes.

METHODS

Ninety patients aged 18 years and below (mean, 14.4±3.5) and 31% male who underwent LOA/MUA at an urban tertiary care hospital following prior knee surgery were evaluated. Demographic, clinical, ROM, and revision data were compiled. Primary outcome was absolute ROM. Secondarily, ROM was analyzed as a categorical variable with "Full ROM" defined to be -5 to 130 degrees or better, "functional" ROM was defined as unable to obtain -5 to 130 degrees but not requiring revision, and "failure" defined as resulting in revision arthrofibrosis surgery. t tests and χ analyses were used to compare ROM and count variables between dynamic splinting subgroups.

RESULTS

Mean time from index surgery to LOA/MUA was 6.0±4.4 months, and follow-up was 42±56 months. Index procedures included anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (N=33), tibial spine arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (N=18), fracture fixation (N=17), soft tissue repair (N=17), and multiligament reconstruction (N=5). In total, 68 subjects (76%) had any flexion loss, 57 subjects (63%) had any extension loss, and 40 subjects (44%) had both flexion and extension loss.Fifty-six subjects (62%) had full ROM at final follow-up, 25 subjects (28%) had functional ROM, and 9 subjects (10%) required revision. No demographic, clinical, or surgical variable was predictive of treatment failure. Patients who underwent dynamic splinting preoperatively (N=46; 51%) had greater preoperative flexion (99±16 vs.77±34 degrees; P=0.001), but no difference in flexion at final follow-up (121±20 vs.128±11 degrees; P=0.08). Failure was not associated with time from index procedure to LOA/MUA, and the proportion who regained full ROM postoperatively was equivalent between those who had dynamic splinting and those who did not (65% vs. 59%; P=0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

LOA/MUA for children with arthrofibrotic knees results in significant improvements in ROM with 90% revision-free success. Preoperative dynamic or static progressive splinting improves preoperative flexion but does not affect postoperative range of motion or failure rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.