Performing a Definitive Fusion in Juvenile CP Patients is a Good Surgical Option

Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Early-onset Scoliosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we review the most recent advancements in the approaches to EOS diagnosis and assessment, surgical indications and options, and basic science innovation in the space of early-onset scoliosis research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) covers a diverse, heterogeneous range of spinal and chest wall deformities that affect children under 10 years old. Recent efforts have sought to examine the validity and reliability of a recently developed classification system to better standardize the presentation of EOS. There has also been focused attention on developing safer, informative, and readily available imaging and clinical assessment tools, from reduced micro-dose radiographs, quantitative dynamic MRIs, and pulmonary function tests. Basic science innovation in EOS has centered on developing large animal models capable of replicating scoliotic deformity to better evaluate corrective technologies. And given the increased variety in approaches to managing EOS in recent years, there exist few clear guidelines around surgical indications across EOS etiologies. Despite this, over the past two decades, there has been a considerable shift in the spinal implant landscape toward growth-friendly instrumentation, particularly the utilization of MCGR implants. With the advent of new biological and basic science treatments and therapies extending survivorship for disease etiologies associated with EOS, the treatment for EOS has steadily evolved in recent years. With this has come a rising volume and variation in management options for EOS, as well as the need for multidisciplinary and creative approaches to treating patients with these complex and heterogeneous disorders.

Definitive fusions are better than growing rod procedures for juvenile patients with cerebral palsy and scoliosis: a prospective comparative cohort study

PURPOSE

This study compared the outcomes of juvenile patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion (SF) versus growing rod (GR) surgery.

METHODS

Two prospective multicenter registries were queried for patients 8-10 years old with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent SF or GR surgery (no MCGR). Demographics, radiographs, complications, and outcome scores were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 35 patients in the SF and 15 in the GR group. The mean age at surgery was 10 and 9.3 years in the SF and GR groups, respectively (p = 0.004). In the SF group preoperatively, the major curve measured 86° and 80° in the GR group (p = 0.40). "Definitive" surgery in the GR group consisted of SF in 10, implant retention in three, and implant removal in two. The SF group had 60.8% and the GR group had 45.0% correction following "definitive" surgery (p = 0.03). In the SF group, 8 patients and in the GR group, 9 patients (SF = 22.9%, GR = 60.0%) had a complication (p = 0.01). In the SF group, two patients (5.7%) had reoperations for infection; eight patients (53.3%) in the GR group had reoperations for infection and implant complications (p < 0.001). In the SF group, 23/30 parents (76.6%) noted that the child's life "improved a lot." In the GR group, 3/6 parents (50.0%) noted they were "neutral" about their child's ability to do things, 2/6 (33.3%) were "very dissatisfied."

CONCLUSIONS

SF treatment for juvenile patients with CP and scoliosis resulted in fewer complications and unplanned reoperations and better radiographic outcomes compared with GR. Quality of life improvements were also better in the SF group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Definitive fusion for scoliosis in late juvenile cerebral palsy patients is durable at 5 years postoperatively

PURPOSE

Given the challenges associated with managing progressive scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy (CP), the purpose of this study was to evaluate deformity correction and HRQOL 5 years post-spinal fusion in CP patients who were skeletally immature at the time of surgical correction.

METHODS

CP patients who underwent definitive fusion before age 11 with minimum 5-years follow-up from a prospective, multicenter registry were included. Preoperative, initial postoperative, and 5-years radiographic data were collected. Preoperative and 5-years demographic, surgical data, complications, and CPCHILD outcome scores were analyzed. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment were used to analyze radiographic measures. Paired t test was utilized to compare outcomes. Significance was set at p = 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty patients met inclusion-17 females, 3 males. The mean age was 9 (range 8-10) years. Eight-five percent had spastic CP with GMFCS Level V. Eighteen patients underwent posterior fusion; distal fixation was to the ilium in 80% and to L4-S1 in 20%. Significant correction of the primary curve (p ≤ 0.001) and pelvic obliquity (p ≤ 0.001) were obtained. From initial postoperative to 5-years follow-up there were no significant changes in major curve magnitude (p = 0.638), thoracic kyphosis (p = 0.09) or pelvic obliquity (p = 0.28). CPCHILD personal care, mobility, comfort, and total scores improved from preoperative to 5-years (p < 0.05). One patient needed a reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Surgical decision making for scoliosis in patients with CP can be difficult given the desire to maximize growth while minimizing adverse events. Performing a definitive fusion is a viable option that achieves good correction which remains stable 5 years postoperatively.

Cerebral palsy with dislocated hip and scoliosis: what to deal with first?

PURPOSE

Hip dislocation and scoliosis are common in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Hip dislocation develops in 15% and 20% of children with CP, mainly between three and six years of age and especially in the spastic and dyskinetic subtypes. The risk of scoliosis increases with age and increasing disability as expressed by the Gross Motor Function Score.

METHODS

A hip surveillance programme and early surgical treatment have been shown to reduce the hip dislocation, but it remains unclear if a similar programme could reduce the need for neuromuscular scoliosis. When hip dislocation and neuromuscular scoliosis are co-existent, there appears to be no clear guidelines as to which of these deformities should be addressed first: hip or spine.

RESULTS

Hip dislocation or windswept deformity may cause pelvic obliquity and initiate scoliosis, while neuromuscular scoliosis itself leads to pelvic obliquity and may increase the risk of hip dislocation especially on the high side. It remains unclear if treating imminent hip dislocation can prevent development of scoliosis and vice versa, but they may present at the same time for surgery. Current expert opinion suggests that when hip dislocation and scoliosis present at the same time, scoliosis associated pelvic obliquity should be corrected before hip reconstruction. If the patient is not presenting with pelvic obliquity the more symptomatic condition should be addressed first.

CONCLUSION

Early identification of hip displacement and neuromuscular scoliosis appears to be important for better surgical outcomes.