1
|
Woods CR, Bradley JS, Chatterjee A, Kronman MP, Arnold SR, Robinson J, Copley LA, Arrieta AC, Fowler SL, Harrison C, Eppes SC, Creech CB, Stadler LP, Shah SS, Mazur LJ, Carrillo-Marquez MA, Allen CH, Lavergne V. Clinical Practice Guideline by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA): 2023 Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of Acute Bacterial Arthritis in Pediatrics. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2024; 13:1-59. [PMID: 37941444 DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piad089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
This clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial arthritis (ABA) in children was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for children with ABA, including specialists in pediatric infectious diseases and orthopedics. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. Summarized below are the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA in children. The panel followed a systematic process used in the development of other IDSA and PIDS clinical practice guidelines, which included a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendation using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) (see Figure 1). A detailed description of background, methods, evidence summary and rationale that support each recommendation, and knowledge gaps can be found online in the full text.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles R Woods
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center College of Medicine Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee
| | - John S Bradley
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, and Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Archana Chatterjee
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew P Kronman
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sandra R Arnold
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Joan Robinson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lawson A Copley
- Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Antonio C Arrieta
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Orange County and University of California, Irvine, California
| | - Sandra L Fowler
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - C Buddy Creech
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Laura P Stadler
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Samir S Shah
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Lynnette J Mazur
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| | - Maria A Carrillo-Marquez
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Coburn H Allen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Valéry Lavergne
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of Montreal Research Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Systematic review: investigating the added diagnostic value of gadolinium contrast agents for osteomyelitis in the appendicular skeleton. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:1285-1296. [PMID: 34643771 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03915-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone marrow. MRI with gadolinium-based contrast is frequently performed for cases of suspected osteomyelitis. The objective of this systematic review is to examine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced vs non-contrast-enhanced MRI for osteomyelitis in the appendicular skeleton. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of MRI in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 2000 to March 2020. There were 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review for a total of 1095 patients. Analytic methods were based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Evidence was evaluated using the STARD criteria for evaluation of completeness and transparency of reporting. RESULTS For diagnosing osteomyelitis in the appendicular skeleton, MRI with gadolinium-based contrast has 89% sensitivity (95% CI, 86-92%), 79% specificity (95% CI, 75-83%), and 90% overall diagnostic accuracy ([SE] = 0.03). For diagnosing osteomyelitis in the appendicular skeleton, MRI without gadolinium-based contrast has a 92% sensitivity (95% CI, 87-96%), 89% specificity (95% CI, 84-93%), and 96% overall diagnostic accuracy ([SE] = 0.03). The median score of included studies was 85% utilizing the STARD criteria with excellent interobserver agreement of 83.4%. Limitations included small sample size of studies, with retrospective designs. CONCLUSION No evidence was found to suggest an added diagnostic value of gadolinium contrast for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in the appendicular skeleton. For routine cases of suspected non-spinal osteomyelitis, non-contrast MRI of the area of interest is the next most appropriate study after radiographs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Shet NS, Iyer RS, Chan SS, Baldwin K, Chandra T, Chen J, Cooper ML, Creech CB, Gill AE, Levin TL, Moore MM, Nadel HR, Saidinejad M, Schooler GR, Squires JH, Swenson DW, Rigsby CK. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Osteomyelitis or Septic Arthritis-Child (Excluding Axial Skeleton). J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S121-S136. [PMID: 35550797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Imaging plays an integral role in the evaluation of suspected musculoskeletal infections in children, not only in the accurate identification of infection such as osteomyelitis or septic arthritis, but also in guiding management. Various diagnostic modalities serve different purposes in the assessment of suspected pediatric musculoskeletal infections. The purpose of this document is to provide imaging guidance in the most frequently encountered clinical scenarios in which osteomyelitis and/or septic arthritis are suspected, outside of the axial skeleton. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra S Shet
- Children's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
| | - Ramesh S Iyer
- Panel Chair, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington; and Chair, SPCC (CoPLL)
| | - Sherwin S Chan
- Panel Vice-Chair, Vice Chair of Radiology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Keith Baldwin
- Associate Professor, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
| | - Tushar Chandra
- Magnetic Resonance Medical Director, Chief of Research, Chief of Medical Education, Co-director of 3D and Advanced Imaging Lab, Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, Florida
| | - Jimmy Chen
- University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida; American Academy of Pediatrics
| | - Matthew L Cooper
- Pediatric Radiology Division Chief, Radiology Medical Director, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - C Buddy Creech
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Infectious Diseases Society of America; and President, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
| | - Anne E Gill
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Terry L Levin
- The Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Chair ACR Pediatric Practice Parameters
| | - Michael M Moore
- Co-director, Division of Radiology Innovation and Value Enhancement (DRIVE), Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Helen R Nadel
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford, Stanford, California; Member Committee on Practice Parameters-Pediatric ACR; and Alternate to Senate Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Mohsen Saidinejad
- UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; American College of Emergency Physicians; and Director, Institute for Health Services and Outcomes Research-The Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor UCLA
| | | | - Judy H Squires
- Chief of Ultrasound; Associate Program Director for Diagnostic Radiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David W Swenson
- Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Cynthia K Rigsby
- Specialty Chair, Department of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Llewellyn A, Jones-Diette J, Kraft J, Holton C, Harden M, Simmonds M. Imaging tests for the detection of osteomyelitis: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-128. [PMID: 31670644 DOI: 10.3310/hta23610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteomyelitis is an infection of the bone. Medical imaging tests, such as radiography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), are often used to diagnose osteomyelitis. OBJECTIVES To systematically review the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy, inter-rater reliability and implementation of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. DATA SOURCES We conducted a systematic review of imaging tests to diagnose osteomyelitis. We searched MEDLINE and other databases from inception to July 2018. REVIEW METHODS Risk of bias was assessed with QUADAS-2 [quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (version 2)]. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using bivariate regression models. Imaging tests were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the location and nature of the suspected osteomyelitis. Studies of children, inter-rater reliability and implementation outcomes were synthesised narratively. RESULTS Eighty-one studies were included (diagnostic accuracy: 77 studies; inter-rater reliability: 11 studies; implementation: one study; some studies were included in two reviews). One-quarter of diagnostic accuracy studies were rated as being at a high risk of bias. In adults, MRI had high diagnostic accuracy [95.6% sensitivity, 95% confidence interval (CI) 92.4% to 97.5%; 80.7% specificity, 95% CI 70.8% to 87.8%]. PET also had high accuracy (85.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.5% to 92.9%; 92.8% specificity, 95% CI 83.0% to 97.1%), as did SPECT (95.1% sensitivity, 95% CI 87.8% to 98.1%; 82.0% specificity, 95% CI 61.5% to 92.8%). There was similar diagnostic performance with MRI, PET and SPECT. Scintigraphy (83.6% sensitivity, 95% CI 71.8% to 91.1%; 70.6% specificity, 57.7% to 80.8%), computed tomography (69.7% sensitivity, 95% CI 40.1% to 88.7%; 90.2% specificity, 95% CI 57.6% to 98.4%) and radiography (70.4% sensitivity, 95% CI 61.6% to 77.8%; 81.5% specificity, 95% CI 69.6% to 89.5%) all had generally inferior diagnostic accuracy. Technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime white blood cell scintigraphy (87.3% sensitivity, 95% CI 75.1% to 94.0%; 94.7% specificity, 95% CI 84.9% to 98.3%) had higher diagnostic accuracy, similar to that of PET or MRI. There was no evidence that diagnostic accuracy varied by scan location or cause of osteomyelitis, although data on many scan locations were limited. Diagnostic accuracy in diabetic foot patients was similar to the overall results. Only three studies in children were identified; results were too limited to draw any conclusions. Eleven studies evaluated inter-rater reliability. MRI had acceptable inter-rater reliability. We found only one study on test implementation and no evidence on patient preferences or cost-effectiveness of imaging tests for osteomyelitis. LIMITATIONS Most studies included < 50 participants and were poorly reported. There was limited evidence for children, ultrasonography and on clinical factors other than diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS Osteomyelitis is reliably diagnosed by MRI, PET and SPECT. No clear reason to prefer one test over the other in terms of diagnostic accuracy was identified. The wider availability of MRI machines, and the fact that MRI does not expose patients to harmful ionising radiation, may mean that MRI is preferable in most cases. Diagnostic accuracy does not appear to vary with the potential cause of osteomyelitis or with the body part scanned. Considerable uncertainty remains over the diagnostic accuracy of imaging tests in children. Studies of diagnostic accuracy in children, particularly using MRI and ultrasound, are needed. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017068511. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 61. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Llewellyn
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Simmonds
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Current Variation in Joint Aspiration Practice for the Evaluation of Pediatric Septic Arthritis. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS 2020; 4:e20.00133. [PMID: 32890012 PMCID: PMC7469993 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-20-00133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric septic arthritis (SA) is a condition that can be associated with significant morbidity. Although previous research has been on predictive care pathways, scrutiny of the literature continues to reveal wide differences in the patient evaluation and management. The purpose of this study was to define the differences in joint aspiration for the evaluation of pediatric SA across pediatric tertiary care institutions in the United States.
Collapse
|
6
|
Septic Arthritis: An Evidence-Based Review of Diagnosis and Image-Guided Aspiration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215:568-581. [PMID: 32783556 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.22773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this evidence-based review is to equip radiologists to discuss and interpret findings obtained with various imaging modalities, guide patient selection for percutaneous aspiration, and safely perform arthrocentesis to assess for infection in both native and prosthetic joints. CONCLUSION. Septic arthritis is an emergency that can lead to rapidly progressive, irreversible joint damage. Despite the urgency associated with this diagnosis, there remains a lack of consensus regarding many aspects of the management of native and periprosthetic joint infections.
Collapse
|
7
|
Govaert GAM, Kuehl R, Atkins BL, Trampuz A, Morgenstern M, Obremskey WT, Verhofstad MHJ, McNally MA, Metsemakers WJ. Diagnosing Fracture-Related Infection: Current Concepts and Recommendations. J Orthop Trauma 2020; 34:8-17. [PMID: 31855973 PMCID: PMC6903359 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 157] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a severe complication after bone injury and can pose a serious diagnostic challenge. Overall, there is a limited amount of scientific evidence regarding diagnostic criteria for FRI. For this reason, the AO Foundation and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society proposed a consensus definition for FRI to standardize the diagnostic criteria and improve the quality of patient care and applicability of future studies regarding this condition. The aim of this article was to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for the diagnosis of FRI. For this purpose, the FRI consensus definition will be discussed together with a proposal for an update based on the available evidence relating to the diagnostic value of clinical parameters, serum inflammatory markers, imaging modalities, tissue and sonication fluid sampling, molecular biology techniques, and histopathological examination. Second, recommendations on microbiology specimen sampling and laboratory operating procedures relevant to FRI will be provided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Diagnostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geertje A. M. Govaert
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Kuehl
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bridget L. Atkins
- The Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mario Morgenstern
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - William T. Obremskey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Michael H. J. Verhofstad
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Martin A. McNally
- The Bone Infection Unit, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Septic arthritis in children is a surgical emergency, and prompt diagnosis and treatment are mandatory. If diagnosed quickly and treated correctly, the outcomes can be good. With delay in diagnosis and without proper treatment, outcomes often are quite devastating, with growth disturbance and joint destruction.
Collapse
|