Effect of Academic Grade Level on Return to Athletic Competition After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Revision ACL reconstruction in pediatric and adolescent patients yields low rates of graft failure and good functional scores, but low rates of return to sport: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes following revision ACL reconstruction in pediatric and adolescent patients in terms of graft failure rate and functional patient outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Ovid, and PubMed databases was performed for all original clinical studies that reported outcomes of pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction. Non-English studies and studies not reporting both graft failure rates and an additional outcome measure were excluded. We evaluated patient demographics, injury mechanisms, surgical technique characteristics, concomitant injuries, failure rates, patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), complications, and return to sports rates. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).

RESULTS

Five studies with a total of 239 knees in 234 patients were included. Failure of the revision ACLR ranged from 9% to 21%. Return to previous level of activity ranged between 27% and 68%. PROMs were variable, with good Lysholm score (range 84.5 to 93.7), moderate Tegner activity score (range 5.5 to 9), and good IKDC scores (range 79.9 to 80.0). Allograft was used in 48% of revisions, followed by bone patellar tendon bone (BPTB) autograft in 34%, and hamstrings (HS) autograft in 14%. Meniscus injury and cartilage injury was present in 53.1% to 92.5% and 5.5% to 59.4% of knees, respectively. Gwet's AC1 coefficient was 0.89, indicating a high degree of interrater reliability. The average MINOR score was 6 and heterogeneity was low (I2=9%). The included studies did not present with sufficient detail to disaggregate clinical outcomes by patient sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision ACLR yields a graft failure ranging from 9 to 20%. Revision patients experience good PROMs but low rates of return to pre-injury level of sport. Further, revision ACLR was associated with high rates of intraarticular damage and relatively low rates of meniscal repair at the time of second surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of level IV evidence.

Defining Return to Sport: A Systematic Review

Background:

Return to sport (RTS) commonly serves as a measure for assessment of clinical outcomes in orthopaedic sports medicine surgery. Unfortunately, while RTS is commonly utilized in research for this purpose, currently there is no widely accepted or standardized definition for when an athlete has officially returned to his or her sport.

Purpose:

To conduct a systematic review to evaluate and report the differences in specific definitions of RTS utilized in the orthopaedic surgery literature.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Trials databases per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Search terms consisted of variations of “RTS” combined with variations of “orthopedic surgery” and “define” to capture as many relevant articles as possible. The definition of RTS was recorded and analyzed.

Results:

A total of 718 articles were identified in the initial search, 29 of which met eligibility criteria, providing a clear definition of RTS. Of the 29 studies included, 20 (69.0%) defined RTS as an athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Three (10.3%) defined this as the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play but with an explicitly stated competition-level modifier of the athlete returning to his or her preinjury level of competition. Two articles (6.9%) included returning to training or practice, and the remaining 4 articles (13.8%) used terminology other than the standard RTS.

Conclusion:

There is variability in the definition of RTS used in orthopaedic sports medicine literature. Most studies refer to the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Other variants include returning to practice/training and explicitly defined competition levels and objectives. Future studies should aim to standardize the definition of RTS to facilitate more precise assessment of outcome after sports medicine surgery. Using terminology that describes components of the recovery and rehabilitation process, such as “return to participation” and “return to performance,” in addition to RTS will allow us to more clearly understand the athlete’s recovery and associated level of competition or performance.

Physical therapy in adolescents with knee injuries treated with arthroscopy: our experience and literature review

If not treated adequately, the knee injuries in adolescents can cause long-term functional impairments. The aim of our study was to quantify the functioning capacity in children who suffered soft tissues and/or bone lesions of the knee treated by arthroscopy. We reviewed the medical charts of 5 adolescent patients diagnosed with sport knees injuries, admitted in our clinic in the last two years. Arthroscopy was made three weeks after the injury. Afterwards, they were addressed to the Rehabilitation Department and followed the physical exercise programme. The patients were assessed at the beginning of rehabilitation and after 3 months: knee ROM (flexion and extension deficit) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective evaluation. At the final assessment all patients presented significantly improvements in knee range of motion and functional capacity. Arthroscopic surgery, followed by a tailored rehabilitation programme, is important in the management of adolescents with knee injuries.