Inappropriately Timed Pediatric Orthopaedic Referrals From the Emergency Department Result in Unnecessary Appointments and Financial Burden for Patients

The Gartland classification for expediting supracondylar humerus fracture triage: a collaborative approach to structured reporting between pediatric radiologists and orthopedists

BACKGROUND

The modified Gartland classification is an important tool for evaluation of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) because it can direct treatment decisions. Gartland type I can be managed outpatient, while emergent surgical consult occurs with type II and III. This study assesses the interobserver reliability of the Gartland classification between pediatric radiologists and orthopedic providers.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 320 children diagnosed with a SCHF at a single tertiary children's hospital during 2022 was conducted. The Gartland classification documented in the radiographic report by a pediatric radiologist and the classification documented in the first encounter with an orthopedic provider was collected. Kappa value was used to assess interobserver reliability of classifications between radiologists and orthopedic providers. A second group of 76 Gartland type I SCHF from 2015, prior to our institution's implementation of structured reporting, was reviewed for comparison of unnecessary orthopedic consults at initial presentation.

RESULTS

The Gartland classification has excellent interobserver reliability between radiologists and orthopedic providers with 90 % (289/320) agreement and kappa of 0.854 (confidence interval: 0.805-0.903). The most frequent disagreement that occurred was fractures classified as type II by radiology and type III by orthopedics. There were similar rates of consults for the 2015 and 2022 cohorts (p = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

The Gartland classification system is a reliable and effective tool for communication between radiologists and orthopedic providers. Implementing a structured reporting system has the potential to improve triage efficiency for SCHF.

Socioeconomic Status Affects Postoperative Time to Union in Pediatric Patients with a Surgically Treated Fracture

Fractures account for 10% to 25% of all pediatric injuries, and surgical treatment is common. In such cases, postoperative healing can be affected by a number of factors, including those related to socioeconomic status (SES). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between time to fracture union and SES, which was measured with use of the median household income (MHI) and Child Opportunity Index (COI).

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of pediatric patients with a long-bone fracture that had been surgically treated at a Level-I pediatric trauma center between January 2010 and June 2020. Demographic and relevant medical data were collected. Patients were sorted into union and nonunion groups. The ZIP code of each patient was collected and the MHI and COI of that ZIP code were identified. Income brackets were created in increments of $10,000 ranging from $20,000 to $100,000, with an additional category of >$100,000, and patients were sorted into these groups according to MHI. Comparisons among the income groups and among the union status groups were conducted for each of the collected variables. A multiple regression analysis was utilized to determine the independent effect of each variable on time to union.

Results

A total of 395 patients were included in the final sample, of whom 51% identified as Hispanic. Patients in the union group had a higher mean COI and MHI. Nonunion occurred in only 8 patients. Patients who achieved fracture union in ≤4 months had a significantly higher mean COI and MHI. When controlling for other demographic variables, the time to union increased by a mean of 9.6 days for every $10,000 decrease in MHI and increased by a mean of 6.8 days for every 10-unit decrease in the COI.

Conclusions

The present study is the first, to our knowledge, to investigate the relationship between SES and time to fracture union in pediatric patients. When controlling for other demographic factors, we found a significant relationship between SES and time to union in pediatric patients with a surgically treated fracture. Further investigations of the relationship between SES and time to union in pediatric patients are needed to determine potential mechanisms for this relationship.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Referral patterns to a pediatric orthopedic clinic: pediatric orthopedic surgeons are primary care musculoskeletal medicine physicians

In 2004, Reeder and in 2012, Schwend reported that inappropriate nonsurgical referrals to pediatric orthopedic clinics create a misuse of resources. Additional authors have called for re-emphasis and additional training in musculoskeletal medicine for primary care physicians (PCP) to improve the confidence, knowledge and performance when managing musculoskeletal conditions. The current study compares the diagnoses referred to a pediatric orthopedic clinic with diagnoses recommended for referral by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines to determine if any improvement in the quality of referrals has occurred since Reeder and Schwend's article. A chart review of new referrals to a pediatric orthopedic clinic during a 3-month-period was performed. Data were collected on age, sex, referring diagnosis, referral source, final diagnosis and treatment. In total 230 new consults were evaluated. The referral source was a PCP in 169 (73.5%) cases, 30 (13%) self-referrals by a parent, 19 (8.3%) from another orthopedic surgeon, 9 (3.9%) from a neurologist and 3 (1.3%) from another specialist. Fifty percent of referrals met the criteria outlined in the AAP guidelines for referral to a pediatric orthopedic specialist and 48% were classified as primary care musculoskeletal conditions. During the 15 years since the publication of Reeder's study and despite a limited re-emphasis on musculoskeletal education, the percent of inappropriate referrals to a pediatric orthopedic clinic remains unchanged at 50%. We support an expanded musculoskeletal educational effort aimed at the medical, resident and pediatrician level, online decision-making aids, and implementation of a standardized referral form with the specific criteria of the AAP included.

The Role of Patient and Parent Education in Pediatric Cast Complications

Cast immobilization remains the standard of care in managing pediatric fractures. Cast complications often result in emergency department visits, office calls and visits, or lasting patient morbidities that burden the healthcare institution from a time and economic standpoint. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to create a multimodal cast care education protocol with an aim of decreasing cast complications over a 6-week period. Qualified patients (0-18) placed in cast immobilization received a quick response (QR) code sticker on their casts linked to a custom cast care website with text, pictures, and video instructions. Incidence of cast complications, complication type, effect(s) on workflow, and patient demographics were recorded. The complication rate declined 7.6%, but it was not statistically significant. Continuous access to clinic-specific cast instructions demonstrates decreased cast complications in pediatric populations, and this approach to patient education can be easily utilized across all medical specialties.

Transfers of pediatric patients with isolated injuries to a rural Level 1 Orthopedic Trauma Center in the United States: are they all necessary?

BACKGROUND

Pediatric fractures are difficult to manage and often result in expensive urgent transfers to a pediatric trauma center. Our study seeks to identify patients transferred with isolated acute orthopedic injuries to a Level 1 center in which no procedure occurred and the patient was discharged home. We sought to examine all patients who are transferred to a Level 1 pediatric trauma center for care of isolated orthopedic injuries, and to determine how often no procedure is performed after transfer. Identification of this group ahead of time could potentially lead to less avoidable transfers.

METHODS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients with isolated orthopaedic injuries who were transferred to a Level 1 pediatric trauma center in a rural state within the United States over a 5-year period beginning January, 2011 and ending December, 2015. Demographic factors were collected for each patient as well as diagnosis and treatment at the trauma center. Patients were divided into two groups, those who underwent an operation or fracture reduction after admission and those that had no procedure performed. Patient demographics, fracture types and presentation characteristics were examined to attempt to determine factors related to the potentially avoidable transfers.

RESULTS

1303 patients were identified who were transferred with isolated orthopedic fractures. Of these, 1113 (85.6%) patients underwent a procedure for their injuries, including 821 treated with surgical intervention and 292 treated with closed reduction of their fracture. 190 of 1303 (14.6%) of the patients transferred with isolated injuries had neither surgery nor a reduction performed. Identifying characteristics of the non-operative group were that they contained a substantially higher percentage of females, transfers by ambulance, fractures involving only the tibia, fracture types classified as other, and fractures from motor-vehicle accidents.

DISCUSSION

Approximately 14.6% of patients transferred to a pediatric Level 1 trauma center for isolated orthopedic injury underwent no surgery or fracture reductions and were discharged directly home. In particular, isolated tibia fractures were more frequently treated without reduction or surgery. In the future, telemedicine consultation for these specific injury types may limit unnecessary and costly transfers to a Level 1 pediatric trauma hospital.

Impact of Cost Information on Parental Decision Making: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Cast Versus Splint Selection for Pediatric Distal Radius Buckle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Price transparency purports to help patients make high-value health care decisions, however, there is little data to support this. The pediatric distal radius buckle fracture (DRBF) has 2 equally efficacious but not equally priced treatment options (cast and splint), serving as an excellent potential model for studying price transparency. This study uses the DRBF model to assess the impact of up-front cost information on a family's treatment decisions when presented with clinically equivalent treatment options for a low-risk injury.

METHODS

Participants age 4 to 14 presenting with an acute DRBF to a hospital-based pediatric orthopaedic clinic were recruited for this randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized into cost-informed or cost-blind cohorts. All families received standardized information about the injury and treatment options. Cost-informed families received additional cost information. Both groups were allowed to freely choose a treatment. Families were surveyed regarding their decision factors. Cost-blinded families were subsequently presented with the cost information and could change their decision. Independent samples t tests and χ2 tests were utilized to evaluate differences.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients were enrolled (53% cost-informed, 47% cost-blind). The 2 groups did not significantly differ in demographics. Immobilization selection did not differ between groups, with 48% of the cost-informed families selecting the more expensive option (casting), compared with 47% of the cost-blind families. Cost was the least influential factor in the decision-making process according to participant survey, influencing only 9% of families. Only one family changed their decision after receiving cost information, from a splint to a cast.

CONCLUSION

Families appear to be cost-insensitive when making medical treatment decisions for low-risk injuries for their child. Price transparency alone may not help families arrive at a decision to pursue high-value treatment in low-risk orthopaedic injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Secondary School Socioeconomic Status and Athletic Training Practice Characteristics

CONTEXT

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a significant predictor of morbidity and mortality across health outcomes. Limited information exists on how school SES impacts athletic training practice when a certified athletic trainer (AT) is present at secondary schools.

OBJECTIVE

To describe contact frequencies and service rates provided by ATs for injuries among secondary school student athletes and how these differ by school SES.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study Setting: Athletic training room (ATR) visit days and AT services were collected from 77 secondary schools. Schools were separated into three school SES groups: affluent (n=31), average (n=29), and disadvantaged (n=17).

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Secondary school student-athletes participating in 12 boys' and 11 girls' sports who visited the ATR during the 2014-2015 through 2018-2019 academic years and received athletic or non-athletic injury care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Contact frequencies expressed as ATR visit days per injury, AT services per injury, and AT services per ATR visit day. Rates for service type utilized were expressed as the total count over reported athlete-exposures.

RESULTS

ATs documented 1,191 services. Affluent and average SES school communities provided greater contact frequencies for injury related care compared to disadvantaged school communities, particularly by AT services/injury (7.10±13.08 versus average: 9.30±11.60 and affluent: 9.40±12.20; p=0.020). Affluent school communities provided greater rates of services in five of the eleven service groups reported. No significant differences were observed among school SES groups in therapeutic exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reflect that AT practice characteristics may differ by school SES, but these differences do not appear to result in less medical care. Given the complexity and widespread effects of SES, future investigations should utilize a complex method to determine SES as well as aim to identify how SES may impact secondary school student athletes outside of AT practice characteristics.

The single visit treatment of pediatric distal radius buckle fractures-A center's experience with the treatment algorithm

INTRODUCTION

This descriptive study aims to review and evaluate the implementation of a single visit treatment protocol for pediatric distal radius buckle fractures at our center - its success, learning points and limitations. It hopes to raise awareness of the efficacy of the protocol and its benefits to promote its utilization.

METHODS

Following a pilot study, the protocol was implemented from 1 March 2017. A retrospective review of clinical records over 2 years since implementation for patients with a new-visit diagnosis of "distal radius buckle fracture" was conducted. Data collected included age at time of injury, gender, side of injury, whether the patient was enrolled into the protocol, number of clinic visits, and number of radiographic examination(s) performed. Each record was reviewed up to 3 months post-injury to check for any complications or return visits. Costs of specific treatment interventions were also obtained from the hospital's finance department.

RESULTS

286 patients with buckle fractures of the distal radius eligible for enrolment into the single visit treatment protocol were identified. Of these, 202 patients (70.6%) were enrolled and managed with the protocol, while 84 patients (29.4%) were treated with conventional management. Of the 202 protocol-managed patients, all fractures healed without complications. Only 4 patients returned for additional clinic visits. Another 4 patients had additional X-rays taken on top of their initial injury film. A breakdown of expenses for treatment also showed cost savings of USD 110.67 and USD 320.80 for residents and non-residents respectively for single visit treatment.

CONCLUSION

Single visit treatment of pediatric distal radius buckle fractures is recommended and supported by evidence, with advantages of convenience, cost reduction, and being less labor intensive.

A systematic approach to describing fractures

Clinicians, including practitioners in primary care and across numerous specialties, are essential to the interpretation of imaging for correlating clinical presentation with fracture identification on plain radiographs. A comprehensive review of radiographs lets clinicians document findings accurately and communicate these findings to colleagues, specialists, and patients. This article reviews fracture terminology that clinicians need to provide better understanding of the injury and direct appropriate management.