Dynamic 3D Reconstruction of Thoracic Cage and Abdomen in Children and Adolescents With Scoliosis: Preliminary Results of Optical Reflective Motion Analysis Assessment

Preliminary evaluation of sagittal and transverse plane cross-sectional variations of the trunk during quiet and deep breathing by optical reflective motion analysis in patients with scoliosis

Trunk movements during quiet and deep breathing in untreated and in operated patients with scoliosis are not well defined. To evaluate sagittal and transverse plane cross-sectional variations of the trunk during quiet and deep breathing by optical reflective motion analysis (ORMA) in children with scoliosis. Twenty-one patients were divided into three groups: normal subjects (A; n = 6), subjects with untreated scoliosis >50° (B; n = 7) and operated patients (C; n = 8). Standing and sitting height, T1-T12 and L1-L5 length, arm span, chest perimeter, weight and BMI were recorded. Trunk movements of all patients, during quiet and deep breathing, were measured with a 10-camera 3D ORMA system (82 markers) with the subjects in a standard standing position. Groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, height, arm span and weight (P > 0.05). Significant differences were found in Cobb angle, chest perimeter and BMI (P < 0.05). Trunk sagittal and transverse plane movements during quiet and deep breathing decreased significantly in group B and group C when compared to group A (P < 0.05). Surgery does not completely eliminate sagittal and transverse plane kinematics, although the spine is rendered more rigid. This preliminary study involving a relatively limited number of patients outlines ORMA is a useful tool for analyzing sagittal and transverse plane motion abnormalities of the trunk. Trunk kinematics was altered during breathing in unoperated patients with scoliosis >50°. Operated subjects had sagittal plane trunk kinematics closer to normal subjects, although changes were less pronounced at the level of the convex side.

Limited trunk motion and posterior pelvic tilting in ambulatory children treated with bilateral rib to pelvis implants for spinal deformity control

In young children, growth-friendly spinal implants with bilateral rib to pelvis fixation are used to control progressive spinal deformity. Whereas curve progression, complications and side-effects have been extensively studied in this patient population, no data are available on gait pattern changes and postural body adjustments. Our study evaluates whether gait pattern changed for ambulatory children treated with bilateral rib to pelvis implants compared to age-matched healthy children. In this small cohort study, gait analysis was performed using spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of four ambulatory children with severe scoliosis and growth-friendly spinal implants using the bilateral rib to pelvis fixation. Data were statistically analyzed and compared to seven healthy age-matched children. Between both groups, no differences were seen in walking speed, cadence and stride length. The treated patients showed a lower range of motion of the pelvic obliquity and of the trunk obliquity and rotation, but a higher knee flexion. Growth-friendly spinal implants with bilateral rib to pelvis fixation are commonly used in wheelchair children and rarely indicated in ambulatory patients. The presented data show reduced trunk and pelvis motion using this implant construct. These findings help to understand body postural adjustments and add valuable information for families and care providers when considering this surgery. Level of evidence: Therapeutic level IV.

Performance of Forward Roll Maneuvers Following Corrective Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

BACKGROUND

Fusion surgeries for scoliosis patients are believed to deteriorate sports performance; in particular, forward roll should deteriorate, but no literature is available to substantiate this claim.

HYPOTHESIS

The extent of postoperative deterioration can vary according to surgery type or curve type.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Idiopathic scoliosis patients between 10 and 29 years of age who underwent correction and fusion surgeries at our hospital were included in this study. Forward roll was recorded on video preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Performances were evaluated twice on a 10-point scale by two blinded examiners. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative upright spinal radiographs were analyzed for the Lenke classification, number of fused vertebrae, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, major curve Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and surgical procedures.

RESULTS

The average age was 16 years. Curve types according to the Lenke classification were: 15, type 1; 5, type 2; 14, type 5; 2, type 6. The mean number of fused vertebrae was 6.9 (3.2 for anterior surgeries and 9.3 for posterior surgeries). The mean preoperative assessment of forward roll was 9.6 points, and the 1-year postoperative assessment was lower at 8.8 points. Cluster analysis classified patients into 3 groups: long fusion with marked performance deterioration (C1), long fusion with minimal deterioration (C2), and short fusion with minimal deterioration (C3). The upper and lower instrumented vertebrae in C1 were more distal than those in C2.

CONCLUSION

Patients with thoracic curves were classified into two groups, and patients who underwent surgeries with more distal upper and lower instrumented vertebra levels exhibited lower postoperative performance. However, patients with Lenke 5 curves who underwent anterior surgery showed better preoperative performance than other patients who underwent posterior surgery, showing minimal postoperative deterioration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III;Therapeutic Study.

55th Harrington Lecture: The respiratory impact of EOS and its therapies: where are we and where do we go from here?

The following lecture was delivered at the Scoliosis Research Society annual meeting in 2020. It addresses our current knowledge about the respiratory impact of Early Onset Scoliosis, the limitations in the data that have been published, and the opportunity for further clinical research in the field.