Plantar Pressures Following Surgical Release in Children With Clubfoot: Comparison of Posterior Release, Posteromedial Release, and Nonoperative Correction

Comparison of kinematics and pedobarography findings between the unaffected foot of patients with unilateral clubfoot and controls

PURPOSE

Idiopathic clubfoot (ICF) involves structural abnormalities in the lower extremities. Approximately half of patients have unilateral ICF, which could be due to differences in limb formation. The contralateral unaffected foot may have subclinical ICF. The objectives were to compare ankle and foot kinematics and pedobarography findings between the unaffected foot of patients with unilateral ICF and controls.

METHODS

Eleven children with unilateral ICF (11 unaffected feet, 11.7 ± 3.8 years) and 15 age-matched controls (30 control feet, 11.1 ± 3.0 years) were enroled. Five complete gait trials were performed. Data were collected using ten cameras and a two m long Footscan system and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

All children with ICF underwent the selective soft tissue release procedure. The unaffected feet showed limited ranges in inversion-eversion and dorsiflexion-plantar flexion on kinematic analysis. There was a delay in landing time in all regions of the foot during heel rise and propulsion. The peak time was achieved significantly later in the unaffected feet compared to the controls. Although plantar pressure parameters were comparable, unaffected feet showed a larger contact area in the midfoot region.

CONCLUSIONS

Gait data on the unaffected foot in unilateral ICF patients do not correspond to those of controls despite an indistinguishable clinical appearance. This could be due to the effect of treatment, the process of foot development, or a combination. The relationship between genetics and gait deviation in patients with unilateral ICF needs further evaluation. The unaffected foot should receive similar attention during follow-up.

Updates in the Surgical Management of Recurrent Clubfoot Deformity: a Scoping Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article focuses on the current advances in surgical management for clubfoot deformity, supported by up-to-date longitudinal studies on each approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Long-term analysis following primary and repeated soft tissue releases has demonstrated good results in young patients with low relapse rates. Tibialis anterior transfer following the Ponseti method shows no difference in long-term pedographic analysis in comparison to the Ponseti method alone. Furthermore, tibialis anterior transfer following surgical relapses provides good long-term results with improved correction in talus-first metatarsal angle. Bony osteotomies may also play a role in addressing surgical relapses in older children. However, talar neck osteotomy may result in avascular necrosis of the talar dome. Hexapod external fixation may be considered by experienced surgeons to correct rigid clubfoot deformities in older patients with good long-term results and drastic improvements in pain perception. Long-term analysis of anterior distal tibial epiphysiodesis (ADTE) for recurrent equinus deformity following surgical correction has demonstrated statistical improvements in the anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA) and ankle dorsiflexion. Talectomy and naviculectomy are rarely used in today's practice as long-term studies have demonstrated high relapse rates and residual pain impeding patient mobility. Surgical correction following failure of the conservative approaches can be implemented to achieve full correction in clubfoot deformity. It is difficult to achieve a plantigrade feet with pain-free gait with repeated surgical interventions. Therefore, proper choice of the initial surgical technique is essential for achieving satisfactory long-term outcomes.

A Prospective, Median 15-Year Comparison of Ponseti Casting and Surgical Treatment of Clubfoot

BACKGROUND

In 2010, 2 authors of this current study reported the results of Ponseti treatment compared with primary posteromedial release (PMR) for congenital talipes equinovarus in a cohort of 51 prospective patients. This current study shows outcomes recorded at a median of 15 years after the original treatment.

METHODS

Patient health records were available for all 51 patients at a median of 15 years (range, 13 to 17 years) following treatment of congenital talipes equinovarus with either the Ponseti method (25 patients [38 feet]) or PMR (26 patients [42 feet]). Thirty-eight of 51 patients could be contacted, and 33 patients (65%) participated in the clinical review, comprising patient-reported outcomes, clinical examination, 3-dimensional gait analysis, and plantar pressures.

RESULTS

Sixteen (42%) of 38 Ponseti-treated feet and 20 (48%) of 42 PMR-treated feet had undergone a further surgical procedure. The PMR-treated feet were more likely to undergo osteotomies and intra-articular surgical procedures (15 feet) than the Ponseti-treated feet (5 feet) (p < 0.05). Of the 33 patients reviewed with multimodal assessment, the Ponseti group, compared with the PMR group, demonstrated better Dimeglio scores (5.8 compared with 7.0 points; p < 0.05), Disease Specific Instrument (80.7 compared with 65.6 points; p < 0.05), Functional Disability Inventory (1.1 compared with 5.1; p < 0.05), and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire scores (52.2 compared with 46.6 points; p < 0.05), as well as improved total sagittal ankle range of motion in gait and ankle plantar flexion range at toe-off. The PMR group with clinical hindfoot varus displayed higher pressures in the lateral midfoot and the forefoot.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the numbers of repeat surgical interventions following Ponseti treatment and primary PMR were similar, the PMR-treated feet had greater numbers of osteotomies and intra-articular surgical procedures. Functional outcomes were improved at a median of 15 years for feet treated with the Ponseti method compared with feet treated with PMR, with advantages seen in the Ponseti group over several domains. This study provides the most comprehensive evaluation of outcomes close to skeletal maturity in prospective cohorts, reinforcing the Ponseti method as the initial treatment of choice for idiopathic clubfeet.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a narrative review of the functional evaluation of clubfoot treatment with gait analysis

Clinicians worldwide have embraced Ponseti’s nonoperative approach in the treatment of clubfoot, primarily due to ubiquitous reports of successful outcomes. A crucial component in this measured success, has come from researchers assessing long-term physical function following nonoperative treatment. Gait analysis has been instrumental in objectively evaluating lower extremity kinematics and kinetics while plantar pressures demonstrate the load bearing patterns experienced in the foot. As technology improves, our ability to evaluate function can take place both in the laboratory setting, and in the community. For over 20 years, our institution has been studying the gait patterns of children treated for clubfoot. After adopting the nonoperative approach, we established a prospective research program that has allowed us to study functional outcomes in the very young walker, through growth to adolescents, and finally at skeletal maturity. We have seen over 450 children treated for clubfoot in the Movement Science Lab, for over 1,250 gait assessments over the span of this study. Early results in 105 children (154 feet) treated nonoperatively for clubfoot, showed 56% of children had normal sagittal plane ankle kinematics, however an incidence of 48% of Ponseti feet had increased dorsiflexion in stance phase, leading us to wonder if this was the result of the tenotomy. Intermediate follow up at age 5 years, showed that the incidence of increased dorsiflexion was reduced (24%) and ankle power did not appear to be affected (P>0.05 compared to controls). The research highlighted in this paper presents the application of functional evaluation through growth and the long-term effects of nonoperative treatment on gait and function. This is a review of the functional outcome studies from our experience at Scottish Rite for Children.