Suture-button Versus Screw Fixation in Adolescent Syndesmotic Injuries: Functional Outcomes and Maintenance of Reduction

Better outcomes using suture button compared to screw fixation in talofibular syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: a level I evidence-based meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The present meta-analysis evaluated current level I clinical trials which compared the use of a suture button (SB) versus syndesmotic screw (SS) fixation techniques for syndesmosis injuries of the ankle. The outcomes of interest were to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications. It was hypothesised that SB might achieve better PROMs along with a lower rate of complications.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA statement. In August 2023, PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed. All the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared SB versus SS fixation for syndesmosis injuries of the ankle were accessed. Data concerning the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), and Olerud-Molander score (OMS) were collected at baseline and at last follow-up. Data on implant failure, implant removal, and joint malreduction were also retrieved.

RESULTS

Data from seven RCTs (490 patients) were collected. 33% (161 of 490) were women. The mean length of the follow-up was 30.8 ± 27.4 months. The mean age of the patients was 41.1 ± 4.1 years. Between the two groups (SB and SS), comparability was found in the mean age, and men:women ratio. The SS group evidenced lower OMS (P = 0.0006) and lower AOFAS (P = 0.03). The SS group evidenced a greater rate of implant failure (P = 0.0003), implant removal (P = 0.0005), and malreduction (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Suture button fixation might perform better than the syndesmotic screw fixation in syndesmotic injuries of the ankle.

A comparison of screw and suture button fixation in the management of adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries

Purpose

Ankle injuries involving the tibiofibular syndesmosis often necessitate operative fixation to restore stability to the ankle. Recent literature in the adult population has suggested that suture button fixation may be superior to screw fixation. There is little evidence as to which construct is preferable in the pediatric and adolescent population. This study investigates outcomes of suture button and screw fixation in adolescent ankle syndesmotic injuries.

Methods

A retrospective matched cohort study over 10 years of pediatric patients who underwent ankle syndesmotic fixation at a large Level 1 Trauma Center was conducted. Both isolated syndesmotic injuries and ankle fractures with syndesmotic disruption were included. Preoperative variables collected include basic patient demographics, body mass index, and fracture type. Suture button and screw cohorts were matched based on age, race, sex, and open fracture utilizing propensity scores. Outcomes assessed include reoperation and implant failure.

Results

A total of 44 cases of operative fixation of the ankle syndesmosis were identified with a mean age of 16 years. After matching cohorts based on age, sex, race, and open fracture status, there were 17 patients in the suture button and screw cohorts, respectively. Patients undergoing screw fixation had a six times greater risk of reoperation (p = 0.043) and 13 times greater risk of implant failure (p < 0.001). Out of six cases of reoperation in the screw cohort, five were unplanned.

Conclusion

Our findings favor suture button fixation in operative management of adolescent tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries. Compared with screws, suture buttons are associated with lower risk of both reoperation and implant failure.

Level of evidence

level III therapeutic.

Pediatric Maisonneuve and Tillaux Fractures with Lateral Ankle Dislocation: A Pediatric "Logsplitter" Injury: A Case Report

CASE

A 12-year-old adolescent boy presented with a proximal fibula fracture and lateral ankle dislocation consistent with a Maisonneuve fracture (MF) associated with a transsyndesmotic ankle dislocation. The dislocation was reduced under conscious sedation in the emergency department. Postreduction imaging studies demonstrated a Tillaux fracture. The patient underwent surgical stabilization of the Tillaux fragment and of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. At the 26-month follow-up, the patient remained active without restrictions.

CONCLUSION

Operative treatment of a concurrent MF, Tillaux fracture with lateral ankle dislocation, or a pediatric "logsplitter" injury resulted in satisfactory alignment and function of the ankle joint.

Suture button fixation method used in the treatment of syndesmosis injury: A biomechanical analysis of the effect of the placement of the button on the distal tibiofibular joint in the mid-stance phase with finite elements method

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to research the effect of suture button (SB) fixation, a method used at the treatment of ankle syndesmosis injury, which was applied in various angles, pretension force, and levels, on the distal tibiofibular joint (DTFJ) in the mid-stance phase, with the help of three-dimensional finite elements method (FEM) METHOD: The ankle of a healthy individual was digitally analyzed by a finite element method-based package computer program. Then, anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), interosseous ligament, posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and deltoid ligament (DL) were cut and force and rotation has been applied to the proximal tibia, resulting in syndesmosis injury. Then, various suture button applications on the injured model have been analyzed. Three parameters have been changed; which were divergence in the axial plane (20°, 30°, 40°), distance from the ankle (2, 3, 4 cm), and pretension force (200, 300, 600 N) RESULTS: As the result of this study, the rotation, change in the gap between the distal tibia and distal fibula, and the displacements of the fibula in the x and y axes have been obtained, and numerical results were evaluated. As the force increased, rotation, change in the gap between the distal tibia and distal fibula, and the displacements of the fibula decreased. As suture button application rotation increased, change in the gap between the distal tibia and distal fibula, and displacements of the fibula increased. As the distance from the ankle increases and reaches a certain level, the results converge to those of the healthy model; in the proximal, it diverges from healthy results.

CONCLUSION

In the study, it has been shown that abnormal tibiofibular joint movements can be prevented with suture button application, and optimum application parameters (divergence in the axial plane, distance from the ankle, and pretension force) are given for proper reduction.