Interlocking Fixation in Fassier-Duval Rods: Performance and Success Factors

The Fate of the Bent Rod in Children With Osteogenesis Imperfecta

BACKGROUND

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder characterized by brittle bones and long bone deformity. Realignment and intramedullary rodding with telescopic rods are indicated for progressive deformity and can help prevent fractures. Rod bending is a reported complication of telescopic rods and a common indication for revision; however, the fate of bent lower extremity telescopic rods in the setting of OI has not been reported.

METHODS

Patients with OI at a single institution who underwent lower extremity telescopic rod placement with at least 1-year follow-up were identified. Bent rods were identified, and for these bone segments, we collected the location and angle of bend, subsequent telescoping, refracture, increasing angulation of bend, and date of revision.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-eight telescopic rods in 43 patients were identified. Forty-six rods (27.4%) bent during follow-up, with an average angulation of 7.3 (range: 1 to 24) degrees. In patients with severe OI, 15.7% of rods bent compared with 35.7% in nonsevere OI ( P =0.003). The proportion of bent rods was different between independent and nonindependent ambulators (34.1% and 20.5%; P =0.035). Twenty-seven bent rods (58.7%) were revised, with 12 rods (26.0%) revised early (within 90 d). The angulation of rods that were revised early was significantly higher than rods not (14.6 and 4.3 degrees, P <0.001). Of the 34 bent rods not revised early, the average time to revision or final follow-up was 29.1 months. Twenty-five rods (73.5%) continued to telescope, 14 (41.2%) increased in angulation (average 3.2 degrees), and 10 bones (29.4%) refractured. None of the refractures required immediate rod revision. Two bones had multiple refractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Bending is a common complication of telescopic rods in the lower extremities of patients with OI. It is more common in independent ambulators and patients with nonsevere OI, possibly because of the increased demand placed on the rods. Rods with a small bend and maintained fixation can telescope and need not be an indication for immediate revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Retrospective review.

Which is the best femoral implant in children with osteogenesis imperfecta? a retrospective cohort study of 783 procedures

BACKGROUND

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a hereditary genetic disorder characterized by bone fragility and extremity deformities. The surgical management for long-bone fractures and deformities in OI remains a challenge. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes after femoral surgery splinted with the telescopic rod, the plate and screws, the elastic nail and the non-elongating rod in setting of OI.

METHODS

 A retrospective cohort study included 783 femoral procedures (mean age 6.00 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.00) years, 335 (42.8%) females) was conducted, and individuals were categorized into four groups according to implants. After verifying comparability among the groups, revision rate and implant survival period were compared among the Sillence types and the same comparison were made among four groups within each Sillence type. The incidence of refractures, deformities, and implant-related complications were also compared among the four groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic information among the four groups in terms of sex (p = 0.101), laterality (p = 0.587), Sillence type (p = 0.122), and postoperative follow-up period (p = 0.214). In total, children with Sillence type III had the highest revision rate and the shortest implant survival period; children with Sillence type I had the lowest revision rate and the longest implant survival period; and children with Sillence type IV had the revision rate and the implant survival period between those observed in Sillence types I and III. In Sillence types III and IV, the telescopic rod had lower revision rate (III 24.8%; IV 20.9%) compared to the plate (III 97.2%, p<0.001; IV 80.3%, p<0.001), the elastic nail (III 100.0%, p=0.019; IV 73.9%, p<0.001) and the non-elongating rod (III 65.0%, p<0.001; IV46.9%, p<0.001); the median implant survival period of the telescopic rod (III 48.00 (IQR 28.50) months; IV 43.00 (33.00) months) is longer than the plate (III 11.00 (9.00) months, p<0.001; IV 19.00 (20.00) months, p<0.001), the elastic nail (III 45.00 (37.75) months, p=1.000; IV 19.00 (35.00) months, p=0.028) and the non-elongating rod (III 39.00 (31.75) months, p=0.473; IV 38.50 (29.75) months, p=1.000).A similar trend was observed in Sillence type I (p = 0.063, p = 0.003; respectively). In addition, the incidence of refracture (15.5%), deformity (2.8%) and implant-related complications (23.1%) were also statistically lower in the telescopic rod group.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, lower revision rate and longer implant survival period were observed in telescopic rod group. This was mainly due to the significant lower incidence of refracture, deformity and implant-related complications with the use of telescopic rod.

[Osteogenesis imperfecta : A multidisciplinary challenge]

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) describes a group of rare diseases which are associated with an increased tendency to bone fractures. In addition to the main symptom of fractures, OI is characterized by a variety of pediatric, pediatric orthopedic and anesthesiological challenges. The multidisciplinary expertise is mostly concentrated at specialized centers. The current treatment concepts aim at minimizing the fracture rate, prevention and treatment of deformities, pain reduction and improved mobility. In addition to pharmacotherapy, conservative and surgical measures are also applied. Scheduled interventions on the extremities are one of the most commonly performed operations in children with OI. Various intramedullary nailing techniques are available. This article addresses the important aspects of multidisciplinary care of children with OI concerning the treatment of the lower extremities.