Ulnar Epiphysiodesis: Success of the Index Procedure

Physeal Fractures of the Distal Ulna: Incidence and Risk Factors for Premature Growth Arrest

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the rate of distal ulnar growth arrest following physeal fracture and to identify specific risk factors for premature physeal closure.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with a distal ulnar physeal fracture was performed at a single United States children's hospital. Patients without 6-month follow-up were excluded. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were abstracted. Fractures were classified by the Salter-Harris (SH) system. All follow-up radiographs were reviewed for changes in ulnar variance or signs of premature physeal arrest.

RESULTS

Fifty-six children with distal ulnar physeal fracture at a mean age of 10.7±3.3 years were included with a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. The most common fracture pattern was a SH II (52.7%), versus SH I (29.1%), SH III (9.1%), and SH IV (9.1%). Of displaced fractures (41.1%), the mean translation was 40.2±38.3% the and mean angulation was 24.8±20.9 degrees. Eleven fractures (19.6%) demonstrated radiographic signs of growth disturbance, including 3 patients (5.4%) with growth disturbance but continued longitudinal growth and 8 patients (14.3%) with complete growth arrest. The average ulnar variance was -3.4 mm. Three patients underwent subsequent surgical reconstruction including ulnar lengthening with an external fixator, distal ulna completion epiphysiodesis with distal radius epiphysiodesis, and ulnar corrective osteotomy. Patients with displaced fractures and SH III/IV fractures were more likely to develop a growth disturbance (34.8% vs. 3.2%, P =0.003; 50.0% vs. 11.1%, P =0.012, respectively). Children with less than 2 years of skeletal growth remaining at the time of injury had a higher risk of growth disturbance (46.2% vs. 9.5%, P =0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

SH III and IV fractures are more common injury patterns in the distal ulna compared with the distal radius. Growth disturbance or growth arrest occurs in ~20% of distal ulnar physeal fractures. Displaced fractures, intra-articular fractures, fractures requiring open reduction, and older children are at increased risk of distal ulnar growth arrest and should be followed more closely.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV--case series.

Indications and Timing of Guided Growth Techniques for Pediatric Upper Extremity Deformities: A Literature Review

Osseous deformities in children arise due to progressive angular growth or complete physeal arrest. Clinical and radiological alignment measurements help to provide an impression of the deformity, which can be corrected using guided growth techniques. However, little is known about timing and techniques for the upper extremity. Treatment options for deformity correction include monitoring of the deformity, (hemi-)epiphysiodesis, physeal bar resection, and correction osteotomy. Treatment is dependent on the extent and location of the deformity, physeal involvement, presence of a physeal bar, patient age, and predicted length inequality at skeletal maturity. An accurate estimation of the projected limb or bone length inequality is crucial for optimal timing of the intervention. The Paley multiplier method remains the most accurate and simple method for calculating limb growth. While the multiplier method is accurate for calculating growth prior to the growth spurt, measuring peak height velocity (PHV) is superior to chronological age after the onset of the growth spurt. PHV is closely related to skeletal age in children. The Sauvegrain method of skeletal age assessment using elbow radiographs is possibly a simpler and more reliable method than the method by Greulich and Pyle using hand radiographs. PHV-derived multipliers need to be developed for the Sauvegrain method for a more accurate calculation of limb growth during the growth spurt. This paper provides a review of the current literature on the clinical and radiological evaluation of normal upper extremity alignment and aims to provide state-of-the-art directions on deformity evaluation, treatment options, and optimal timing of these options during growth.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for posttraumatic ulnar impaction syndrome in adolescent (younger than 18 years) - Based on the Cha & Shin assessment

PURPOSE

We performed ordinary ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) in patients younger than 18 years old with secondary ulnar impaction syndrome (UIS) after traumatic events. Here, we report the clinical and radiologic outcomes with a review of the previous literature through a retrospective case series.

METHODS

Twenty-two adolescents treated by USOs from 2006 to 2018 were investigated. The amount of shortening was classified into three categories. The first category was for a still open physis on the medial half of the radius in those younger than 15. In this category, we osteotomized the ulna for the physis level to be left neutral or negative by 1-2 mm. The second category had no growth potency in the radius. If the patient was younger than 15, we considered only residual growth of the ulna, thus performing USO for the ordinary UV to be negative by 2-3 mm. For patients aged 15-18 years old, if growth potency was nearly absent in the ulna, we performed traditional USO with a neutral ulnar variance (UV).

RESULTS

Categories 1, 2, and 3 for the amount of USO were determined for 4, 4, and 14 patients, respectively. All USOs properly healed without substantial complications. The mean preoperative UV was 2.91 mm, and the final value decreased to 0.23 with statistical significance (p < 0.001). The range of wrist motion was improved after USO from 133.86° and 132.73° to 154.77° and 160.68° (all, p < 0.001 in flexion-extension and pronation-supination arcs, respectively). The preoperative VAS and MMWS scores also improved from 2.77 to 75.00 to 0.18 and 88.86, respectively, at the final follow-up (all, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

UIS in adolescent populations after trauma in their children/younger adolescents could be properly treated by USO. Even with an open physis at the ulna, neutral UVs could be achieved, and the clinical outcomes were satisfactory. However, long-term follow-up is still needed regarding TFCC and DRUJ status.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.