Variation in Functional Mobility Within Gross Motor Function Classification System Levels

Is the Walking Adaptability Ladder test for Kids (WAL-K) reliable and valid in ambulatory children with Cerebral Palsy?

PURPOSE

Walking adaptability is essential for children to participate in daily life. We studied whether the Walking Adaptability Ladder test for Kids (WAL-K) is reliable and valid for assessing walking adaptability in 6-12 year old ambulatory children with Cerebral Palsy (CP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six children with CP (26 GMFCS-level I, 10 GMFCS-level II) completed the single and double run of the WAL-K. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined by Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs). Construct validity was determined by comparing WAL-K scores between 122 typically developing (TD) and CP children taking age into account, comparing WAL-K scores between CP children in GMFCS-levels I and II, and correlating WAL-K scores with scores of the 10 times 5 m Sprint Test (10 × 5mST).

RESULTS

ICCs for reliability varied between 0.997 and 1.000. WAL-K scores were significantly higher (i.e., worse) in CP children compared to TD children (p < 0.001), and in children in GMFCS-level II compared to GMFCS-level I (p = 0.001). Significant positive correlations were found between the WAL-K and 10 × 5 mST (single run r = .89, double run r = .84).

CONCLUSIONS

The WAL-K shows to be a promising reliable, valid, and easy-to-use tool for assessing walking adaptability in children with CP. Responsiveness to change has yet to be evaluated.

Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument Scores Within Gross Motor Function Classification Scale Levels and Functional Mobility Scale Ratings in Individuals With Cerebral Palsy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) is a patient/parent-reported outcome measure used in children with cerebral palsy (CP). PODCI score variability has not been widely examined in patients of Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level IV or using the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). The purpose of this study is to examine the distribution of PODCI scores within patients with CP GMFCS levels I-IV and FMS levels 1-6.

METHODS

Retrospectively identified patients with CP whose parent/caregiver had completed the PODCI at their visit were grouped based on GMFCS and FMS level. One-way ANOVA with pairwise Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests was performed to compare the effect of GMFCS and FMS levels (1, 2-4, 5, or 6) on PODCI scores.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-seven patients were included (128 female, 11.7 years, SD 3.6). Global, Sports, Transfer, and Upper Extremity scores differed among all GMFCS levels ( P ≤0.056) and were significantly lower for GMFCS IV compared with all other levels. Happiness, Expectations, and Pain scores did not differ significantly among GMFCS levels including level IV ( P >0.06). Similar trends were seen at all FMS distances (5, 50, and 500âm). At 50âm, Global, Sports, Transfer, and Upper Extremity scores differed significantly among all FMS levels ( P <0.001) except that Upper Extremity Scores were similar between levels 2-4 and level 5 ( P =1.00). Happiness and Pain scores were not different between FMS levels ( P >0.27). Expectations scores differed only between FMS 1 and FMS 6 with FMS 6 being higher at the 50-m distance only ( P =0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Parent-reported outcome measures are important for providing patient-centered care. Providers can examine these measures alongside functional classification systems to create a more complete clinical picture of the patient. Providers should be aware of the score trends seen in our results when evaluating the PODCI for individuals with CP to improve shared decision-making and better monitor their need for future care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective study.

Probability of independent walking and wheeled mobility in individuals with cerebral palsy

AIM

To estimate the probability of independent walking and wheeled mobility in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) at home and in the community in relation to age and gross motor function.

METHOD

This was a longitudinal cohort study using data reported into the combined Swedish CP follow-up programme and national quality registry from October 2000 to October 2022. Walking, walking with aids, wheeled mobility, and assisted mobility defined independent or assisted mobility at home and in the community, based on the Functional Mobility Scale with additional data on wheelchair performance, were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 52 858 examinations reported for 6647 individuals with CP (age range 0-32 years, follow-up period 0-22 years). Most children and adults in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I or II walked without assistive devices. The probability of dependence on others for mobility in the community was high for both children and adults in GMFCS levels III to V.

INTERPRETATION

Although independent mobility is vital for participation and social inclusion, many children and adults with CP are dependent on others for mobility. We recommend clinicians, together with families and individuals with CP, explore how to increase access to independent mobility from an early age and continuously throughout the life course.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

• There is a high probability of independent walking in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to II. • Mobility options vary most at home and in the community in GMFCS level III. • Being dependent on others for mobility is likely in GMFCS levels III to V.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the functional mobility scale in children with cerebral palsy into Arabic

Introduction

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a lifelong disorder of posture and movement which often leads to a myriad of limitations in functional mobility. The Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) is a parent-report measure of functional mobility for children with CP at three different distances (5 m, 50 m, and 500 m). This is a cross-sectional study which sought to translate and culturally adapt the FMS into Arabic and to validate the translated version. Functional mobility for children and adolescents with CP in Saudi Arabia was examined.

Methods

The translation methodology complied with the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 translation package. A total of 154 children with CP were recruited (mean age 8.16 ± 3.32 years). Parents were interviewed to rate the usual walking ability of their children on the Arabic FMS. The re-test assessment was done with 34 families. The mean time interval between the first and second sessions was 14.3 days (SD = 8.5), with a range of 6-37 days.

Results

Concurrent validity was explored using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between scores of the Arabic FMS with their corresponding score on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Spearman's r values ranged between (-0.895 and -0.779), indicating strong to very strong correlations. The Test-retest reliability was examined using Cohen's weighted kappa, which showed almost perfect agreements. There was greater limitation for functional mobility at longer distances as 55.2% of children could not complete 500 meters (FMS score N). Overall, there was limited use of wheelchairs for all distances (ranging from 9.1% to 14.3%). Levels IV and V on the GMFCS had less variation in FMS scores and most of the children in these levels either did not complete the distances (no functional mobility at all distances) or used a wheelchair for mobility.

Discussion

The Arabic FMS was shown to be a reliable and valid measure of functional mobility for children with CP in their environment based on the parental reports. Functional mobility varied at different distances and within each GMFCS level. The use of both the GMFCS and FMS when assessing children with CP is recommended.