1
|
Trobisch PD, Kim HJ, Himpe B, Chang DG. Radiological Outcomes of Re-tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 2-to-5-year Follow-Up Case Series After Index Vertebral Body Tethering Failure. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08363-x. [PMID: 38888800 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08363-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) has been shown to have a less predictable outcome compared to spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Tether breakage is a common mechanical event that sometimes leads to loss of correction. No data has been published that evaluates the outcome of re-tethering in patients who underwent revision surgery for failed VBT, which was the purpose of this study. METHODS This is an analysis of a prospectively collected single center database of 290 patients who have had VBT. Patients for this study were included if they have had re-tethering after failed VBT and a minimum follow up of 24 months after index surgery as well as a minimum follow up of 12 months after revision surgery. Revision surgeries included tether exchange, tether reinforcement and/or mono- and bisegmental lateral fusion. Main outcome of interest was curve magnitude at latest follow up. RESULTS 11 patients were identified who received VBT for 16 curves of which 13 curves have had failed index surgery. Mean follow up from index surgery was 40 months, time between index and revision surgery was 22 months and latest follow up after revision surgery 19 months. Re-tethering resulted in an additional correction of 42% for thoracic and 63% for thoracolumbar curves. These results remained clinically stable with only minor loss of correction at final follow up. No patient underwent or was indicated for spinal fusion. CONCLUSION Re-tethering is feasible and able to achieve additional correction and a sustainable result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per D Trobisch
- Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
- Department of Spine Surgery, St. Elisabethenkrankenhaus Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Hong Jin Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bastian Himpe
- Department of Spine Surgery, St. Elisabethenkrankenhaus Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Dong-Gune Chang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trobisch PD, Kim HJ, Da Paz S, Alkharsawi M, Castelein R, Chang DG. Early-term outcome of apical fusion with vertebral body tethering for thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:2530-2535. [PMID: 38615086 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08242-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has become an alternative option for select patients with idiopathic scoliosis. However, studies have shown a high number of tether breakages, specifically after thoracolumbar (TL) VBT, that can have a negative impact on the outcome, when the breakage occurs within the first year after surgery. In order to overcome this problem, we have started to apply an apical fusion (AF) in combination with TL VBT for select patients. This study aims to analyze the outcome after AF plus VBT. METHODS This is a retrospective single surgeon's data analysis. All patients were included who have had TL VBT after January 2022 and a follow-up of 12 months. Patients were grouped based on whether they only had VBT or VBT + AF. RESULTS Twenty-five patients were analyzed (15 VBT, 10 VBT + AF). Both groups showed a significant curve correction for thoracic and TL curves. Minor loss of correction was observed in both groups. A significant difference was seen regarding early tether breakages, which were found in 60% of VBT patients and 10% of VBT + AF patients. CONCLUSION The preliminary data shows a significant reduction of early tether breakages when TL VBT is applied in combination with AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per D Trobisch
- Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
| | - Hong-Jin Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Stephanie Da Paz
- Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany
| | - Mahmoud Alkharsawi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany
| | - Rene Castelein
- Dutch Scoliosis Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Dong-Gune Chang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Regan C, Transtrum MB, Jilakara B, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN. How Long Can You Delay? Curve Progression While Awaiting Vertebral Body Tethering Surgery. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2209. [PMID: 38673483 PMCID: PMC11050359 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The implications of delaying surgical intervention for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) wishing to undergo vertebral body tethering (VBT) have not yet been explored. It is important to understand how these delays can impact surgical planning and patient outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review that analyzed all AIS patients treated between 2015 and 2021 at a single tertiary center. Time to surgery from initial surgical consultation and ultimate surgical plan were assessed. Patient characteristics, potential risk factors associated with increased curve progression, and reasons for delay were also analyzed. Results: 174 patients were evaluated and 95 were scheduled for VBT. Four patients later required a change to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) due to excessive curve progression. Patients requiring PSF were shown to have significantly longer delays than those who received VBT. Additionally, longer delays, younger age, greater curve progression, and lower skeletal maturity were correlated with significant curve progression (≥5 degrees). Conclusions: Surgical delays for AIS patients awaiting VBT may lead to significant curve progression and necessitate more invasive procedures. Patients with longer delays experienced an increased risk of needing PSF instead of VBT. Of those requiring PSF, the majority were due to insurance denials. Optimizing surgical timing and shared decision-making among patients, families, and healthcare providers are essential for achieving the best outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - A. Noelle Larson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (C.R.); (M.B.T.); (B.J.); (T.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sullivan MH, Jackson TJ, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN, Kepler CK, Sebastian AS. Evidence-based Indications for Vertebral Body Tethering in Spine Deformity. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:82-91. [PMID: 37684718 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Posterior spinal fusion has long been established as an effective treatment for the surgical management of spine deformity. However, interest in nonfusion options continues to grow. Vertebral body tethering is a nonfusion alternative that allows for the preservation of growth and flexibility of the spine. The purpose of this investigation is to provide a practical and relevant review of the literature on the current evidence-based indications for vertebral body tethering. Early results and short-term outcomes show promise for the first generation of this technology. At this time, patients should expect less predictable deformity correction and higher revision rates. Long-term studies are necessary to establish the durability of early results. In addition, further studies should aim to refine preoperative evaluation and patient selection as well as defining the benefits of motion preservation and its long-term effects on spine health to ensure optimal patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shah SA, Kraft DB, Miyanji F. Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering: A Review of the Available Evidence. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:247-256. [PMID: 38271681 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Idiopathic scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity of the spine with anterior overgrowth (hypokyphosis), coronal curvature, and axial rotation. Scoliosis treatment in the skeletally immature spine is therapeutically challenging because of growth and was commonly limited to observation, bracing treatment, or fusion. Fusion accomplishes powerful deformity correction at the expense of future growth and mobility of the involved segments, increasing the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and intervertebral disk disease later in life. Anterior vertebral body tethering is a motion-preserving technique that exploits the Hueter-Volkmann principle by applying compression at the anterior and convex aspects of the curve to stimulate differential vertebral growth for gradual deformity reduction without fusion. The appropriate timing, curve magnitude, tensioning, growth prediction, indications, and limitations of tethering are being refined as this technique becomes more prevalent. Early outcome studies show that growth modulation with vertebral body tethering is safe, can achieve good results, and preserve motion in select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suken A Shah
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, DE (Shah), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Dr. Kraft), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Dr. Miyanji)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mulford KL, Regan C, Nolte CP, Pinter ZW, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN. Automated measurements of interscrew angles in vertebral body tethering patients with deep learning. Spine J 2024; 24:333-339. [PMID: 37774982 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Vertebral body tethering is the most popular nonfusion treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The effect of the tether cord on the spine can be segmentally assessed by comparing the angle between two adjacent screws (interscrew angle) over time. Tether breakage has historically been assessed radiographically by a change in adjacent interscrew angle by greater than 5° between two sets of imaging. A threshold for growth modulation has not yet been established in the literature. These angle measurements are time consuming and prone to interobserver variability. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop an automated deep learning algorithm for measuring the interscrew angle following VBT surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Single institution analysis of medical images. PATIENT SAMPLE We analyzed 229 standing or bending AP or PA radiographs from 100 patients who had undergone VBT at our institution. OUTCOME MEASURES Physiologic Measures: An image processing algorithm was used to measure interscrew angles. METHODS A total of 229 standing or bending AP or PA radiographs from 100 VBT patients with vertebral body tethers were identified. Vertebral body screws were segmented by hand for all images and interscrew angles measured manually for 60 of the included images. A U-Net deep learning model was developed to automatically segment the vertebral body screws. Screw label maps were used to develop and tune an image processing algorithm which measures interscrew angles. Finally, the completed model and algorithm pipeline was tested on a 30-image test set. Dice score and absolute error were used to measure performance. RESULTS Inter- and Intra-rater reliability for manual angle measurements were assessed with ICC and were both 0.99. The segmentation model Dice score against manually segmented ground truth across the 30-image test set was 0.96. The average interscrew angle absolute error between the algorithm and manually measured ground truth was 0.66° and ranged from 0° to 2.67° in non-overlapping screws (N=206). The primary modes of failure for the model were overlapping screws on a right thoracic/left lumbar construct with two screws in one vertebra and overexposed images. An algorithm step which determines whether an overlapping screw was present correctly identified all overlapping screws, with no false positives. CONCLUSION We developed and validated an algorithm which measures interscrew angles for radiographs of vertebral body tether patients with an accuracy of within 1° for the majority of interscrew angles. The algorithm can process five images per second on a standard computer, leading to substantial time savings. This algorithm may be used for rapid processing of large radiographic databases of tether patients and could enable more rigorous definitions of growth modulation and cord breakage to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kellen L Mulford
- Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Christina Regan
- Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Charles P Nolte
- Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Zachariah W Pinter
- Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Todd A Milbrandt
- Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - A Noelle Larson
- Orthopedic Surgery Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Siu JW, Wu HH, Saggi S, Allahabadi S, Katyal T, Diab M. Radiographic and perioperative outcomes following anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering: a pilot series. Spine Deform 2023; 11:1399-1408. [PMID: 37355490 PMCID: PMC10587020 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00717-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT In patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) of main thoracic and lumbar spine regions, combined anterior thoracic vertebral body tethering and posterior lumbar spine tethering (ATVBT/PLST) is a novel non-fusion treatment option for growth modulation and conservation of motion. METHODS Fourteen patients with AIS who underwent ATVBT/PLST with at least 2-year follow-up were included. Primary outcomes included quality of life as assessed by SRS-22 instruments, radiographic analysis, and revision operations. We secondarily reported perioperative metrics and post-operative opiate morphine equivalents (OME). Clinical success was defined as patients who achieved skeletal maturity with ≤ 30° curve magnitude of both their main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves and who did not undergo posterior spine instrumentation and fusion (PSIF). RESULTS Patients had a mean age of 11.6 years (range 10-14 years), majority were girls (92%), and mean follow-up was 3.0 years (range 2-4.8 years). All patients were skeletally immature with a Risser ≤ 2. Included curves were Lenke 1C, 3C, or 6C. Mean preoperative curve magnitudes were 53° ± 8° (range 45°-65°) main thoracic and 49° ± 9° (range 40°-62°) thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. At most recent follow-up, patients had a mean main thoracic curve of 29° ± 8° (range 15°-40°) and a mean thoracolumbar/lumbar curve of 20° ± 15° (range 4°-35°). 50% required a revision operation. Cable breakage occurred in 43%, which did not always require revision. One patient progressed to thoracic fusion, but no patient underwent lumbar fusion. Patients had a mean SRS-22 outcome score of 4.2 ± 0.4. CONCLUSIONS ATVBT/PLST is a potential alternative to spine fusion for select immature patients with AIS at a minimum 2-year follow-up. ATVBT/PLST potentially offers motion conservation at the cost of a higher revision rate. Further study and reporting of results are necessary to refine indications and techniques, which in turn will improve outcomes of this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV-Case series without comparative group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy W. Siu
- San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Hao-Hua Wu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Satvir Saggi
- San Francisco School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Sachin Allahabadi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Toshali Katyal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Mohammad Diab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boeyer M, Tweedy N, Hoernschemeyer D, Wiesemann S. Central Airway Obstruction with Persistent Pulmonary Decline After Vertebral Body Tethering: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 2023; 13:01709767-202312000-00007. [PMID: 37831807 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.23.00258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
CASE An 11-year-old girl with pectus excavatum presented with an acute airway obstruction and persistent pulmonary compromise after vertebral body tethering (VBT). The anterior instrumentation was occluding her right basilar bronchus, resulting in hyperinflation. Removal of the instrumentation reversed the hyperinflation. CONCLUSION This case illustrates the difficulty of performing VBT in a small patient with severe scoliosis and significant asymmetric pectus excavatum. We recommend using low-profile instrumentation and ensuring the trajectory of the instrumentation is anterior to the rib head and parallel to the articular facets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Boeyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Nicole Tweedy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martin S, Cobetto N, Larson AN, Aubin CE. Biomechanical modeling and assessment of lumbar vertebral body tethering configurations. Spine Deform 2023; 11:1041-1048. [PMID: 37179281 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00697-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless spinal growth modulation technique, which shows promise for pediatric idiopathic scoliosis (IS) curve correction. This technique, mainly used for thoracic curves, is increasingly being used to treat lumbar curves in order to preserve spine flexibility. It remains necessary to adequately define the cord tension to be applied during the operation and the instrumented levels to biomechanically predict correction over time for the lumbar spine. METHODS Twelve pediatric patients with lumbar IS, treated with lumbar-only or lumbar and thoracic VBT, were selected for this study. Three independent variables were tested alternately using a patient-specific finite element model (FEM), which includes an algorithm modeling vertebra growth and spine curve changes due to growth modulation for 24 months post-operatively according to the Hueter-Volkmann principle. Parameters included cable tensioning (150N/250N), upper instrumented level (actual UIV, UIV-1) and lower instrumented level (actual LIV, LIV + 1). Each FEM was personalized using 3D radiographic reconstruction and flexibility supine radiographs. RESULT An increase in cord tension (from 150 to 250N) had significant effects on main thoracic and thoraco-lumbar/lumbar Cobb angles, as well as on lumbar lordosis, after surgery (supplementary average correction of 3° and 8°, and increase of 1.4°, respectively) and after 24 months (4°, 10° and 1.1°) (p < 0.05). Adding a level to the actual UIV or LIV did not improve correction. CONCLUSION This parametric study showed that cord tension is the most important biomechanical parameter on the simulated immediate and 2-year increase in lumbar curve correction. Our preliminary model suggests that it is not advantageous to add additional instrumented levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE This computational study uses a retrospective validation cohort (level of evidence 3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Martin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Downtown Station, P.O. Box 6079, Montreal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada
| | - Nikita Cobetto
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Downtown Station, P.O. Box 6079, Montreal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada
- Research Center, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, 3175 Côte-Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada
| | - A Noelle Larson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Carl-Eric Aubin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Downtown Station, P.O. Box 6079, Montreal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada.
- Research Center, Sainte-Justine University Hospital Center, 3175 Côte-Sainte-Catherine Road, Montreal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Boeyer ME, Farid S, Wiesemann S, Hoernschemeyer DG. Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine. Spine Deform 2023; 11:909-918. [PMID: 36820998 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00662-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for the treatment of main thoracic deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients is becoming increasingly more common, but limited data exist on its safety and efficacy in thoracolumbar deformities. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients with thoracolumbar (TL) deformities that were treated with VBT. METHODS We assessed clinical and radiographic data from twenty-eight consecutive patients that were surgically managed with VBT, all of whom exhibited a TL deformity with at least two years (mean: 44.7 ± 14.5 months) of postoperative follow-up. Standard radiographic parameters were extracted from left hand wrist and standing posterior-anterior and lateral spine radiographs at various timepoints. Outcome variables were assessed based on preoperative Lenke Classification and included: deformity measures, complications, surgical revisions, and postoperative success. RESULTS The mean age at the time of instrumentation was 13.4 ± 1.3 years, with an average preoperative Sanders Stage of 4.6 ± 1.4. A significant reduction in preoperative deformities was observed at most postoperative timepoints. A perioperative complication was observed in three patients and surgical revision was required in another four patients. A suspected broken tether was observed in sixteen patients, most of which occurred at the apex of the lumbar deformity. Only one patient required surgical revision due to a suspected broken tether. We observed an overall success rate of 57%, regardless of Lenke Classification. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that VBT can successfully correct TL deformity patterns in 57% of patients without an increase in the rate of perioperative complications, suspected broken tethers, or surgical revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie E Boeyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, 204 N. Keene Street #102, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA
- Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Sophi Farid
- School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Sebastian Wiesemann
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Daniel G Hoernschemeyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, 204 N. Keene Street #102, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
- Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, Columbia, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Trobisch PD, Castelein R, Da Paz S. Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023:10.1007/s00586-023-07740-2. [PMID: 37133761 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07740-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple studies have analyzed the outcome after thoracic Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT). The results seem reproducible with most studies reporting coronal correction rates around 50% and a tether breakage rate near 20% at two years follow-up. There is a paucity of data on lumbar VBT, and no study has yet analyzed the radiographic outcome after lumbar VBT in a double tether technique at two years follow-up, which was the aim of this study. METHODS This is a retrospective, single surgeons' data analysis of all consecutive immature patients who have had VBT of the lumbar spine (to L3 or L4) between January 2019 and September 2020. Primary interest focused on coronal curve correction at two years post-operatively. Suspected tether breakages were analyzed separately and defined as an angular change of more than 5° between two adjacent screws. RESULTS Forty-one patients were eligible for this study and 35 (85%) had complete two-year follow-up data. Average age at surgery was 14.3 years. All patients had a Sanders stage of 7 or below. Average curve correction for thoracolumbar/lumbar curves at two years follow-up was 50%. 90% of patients had at least one level with a suspected tether breakage. No patient required a revision surgery within two years from surgery but two patients were surgically revised after two years. CONCLUSION VBT in the lumbar spine resulted in 50% coronal curve correction two years post-operatively despite a tether breakage in 90% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per D Trobisch
- Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Spine Surgery, Kammerbruchstr. 8, 52152, Simmerath, Germany.
| | - Rene Castelein
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CZ, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Da Paz
- Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Spine Surgery, Kammerbruchstr. 8, 52152, Simmerath, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Baroncini A, Courvoisier A. The different applications of Vertebral Body Tethering - Narrative review and clinical experience. J Orthop 2023; 37:86-92. [PMID: 36974090 PMCID: PMC10039119 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been originally developed as a growth modulation technique for the surgical management of skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Given the positive results obtained in this setting, the use of VBT is gradually expanding to other patient categories, such as those with no or limited remaining growth or with non-idiopathic scoliosis. Aim of this manuscript is to offer an overview over the current applications of VBT, along with imaging and comments derived from the clinical experience. The work was based on a literature search conducted in January 2023 on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Following keywords were used for the search: vertebral body tethering, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, early onset scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis, syndromic scoliosis. Results Three patient categories in which VBT has been applied have been highlighted: VBT for growth modulation in AIS, VBT as anterior scoliosis correction in AIS and VBT for non-idiopathic curves or early-onset scoliosis. Conclusion While growth modulation in AIS still represents the most widespread use of VBT, the use of this technique has yielded positive results in different settings as well, such as scoliosis correction in AIS or temporary or definitive curve management in non-AIS curves. While long-term results are lacking, patient selection seems to play a central role to reduce the complication rate and ensure predictable and stable results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Baroncini
- Department of Orthopaedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| | - A. Courvoisier
- Grenoble Alpes Scoliosis Center, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|