Displaced Tibia Fractures in Adolescents: Closed Reduction and Casting Versus Flexible Intramedullary Nails

Patient-reported outcomes of adolescents with tibia shaft fractures: comparison of closed reduction and casting vs. elastic stable intramedullary nailing

Tibial shaft fractures are the third most common pediatric long bone fractures. Closed reduction and casting (CRC) is considered initial treatment in this population, however, surgical management using elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is also used in adolescents. This study compared patient-reported outcomes in a cohort of adolescents with tibia fractures treated with ESIN or CRC. This single-center retrospective study gathered adolescent patients 10-18 years of age with closed tibia shaft fractures between the years 2015 and 2021 treated by either CRC or ESIN. Measured outcomes include patient demographics, overall casting time, time to full weight bearing, time to full healing, radiographic healing, complications (loss of reduction, malunion >5° and >10°) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. A total of 141 patients (68% male) were included, with 31 receiving ESIN and 110 having CRC. Patient demographics were similar across groups. At follow-up, CRC had a significant shorter time to healing (11 vs. 15 weeks), but an increased casting duration (7 vs. 4 weeks). Finally, the ESIN group had significantly greater pre-intervention angulation, displacement, and shortening. In both interventions, mobility and pain interference scores showed significant improvements from baseline (2 weeks post-op) at 12, 16, and 24 weeks. No statistically significant differences were noted between CRC and ESIN groups across PROMIS domains of pain interference and mobility. CRC and ESIN are effective in improving pain and mobility in adolescent diaphyseal tibia fractures, but neither intervention is superior based on PROMIS scores at 12, 16 and 24+ weeks. From a patient standpoint, we demonstrate that neither treatment is superior in achieving better-perceived mobility or decreasing pain sooner. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Not Just Small Adults: Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment in Adolescent Tibial Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for tibial shaft fractures in young children is nonoperative management, while in adults, operative treatment is considered the mainstay. There are no clear guidelines on preferred treatment for adolescents.

PURPOSE

This paper aims to 1) identify clinical and radiographic characteristics predictive of malalignment and 2) determine if treatment type affects malalignment risk.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified patients aged 12 to 16 years old with a tibial shaft fracture at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. The primary outcome of interest was malalignment, classified as meeting one or more of the following: >5° coronal angulation, >5° sagittal angulation, translation (cortical width or 100% displaced), and/or rotational deformity. Comparative analyses were done to identify risk factors for malalignment.

RESULTS

A total of 162 patients were included-initial treatment was "planned nonoperative" for 102 patients and "planned operative" for 60 patients. The malalignment rate was 34% in the planned nonoperative group versus 32% in the planned operative group. In a multivariate regression, older patients [odds ratio (OR)=-0.07, 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.01; P =0.024] and those with 100% initial displacement (OR=-0.35, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.05; P =0.021) had decreased odds of malalignment, and having increased sagittal angulation (OR=0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.04; P =0.002) and a fibula fracture (OR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.03-0.41; P =0.023) increased the odds of malalignment. There was no difference in the rate of malalignment by initial treatment ( P =0.289). Having a planned nonoperative treatment (OR=22.7, 95% CI: 14.0-31.5; P <0.001) and having a fibula fracture (OR=8.52, 95% CI: 0.59-16.45; P =0.035) increased the time immobilized.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into factors affecting tibial shaft fracture alignment among patients aged 12 to 16 years. This study suggests that the risk of malalignment is higher among patients with increased initial sagittal angulation and concomitant fibula fractures, but the risk of malalignment is comparable in patients initially treated nonoperatively and operatively. Although healing parameters on average were similar, nonoperative treatment results in longer immobilization time and time for unrestricted weight bearing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Outcomes of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to assess radiographic and clinical outcomes, characterize demographic, injury, and fracture characteristics, and elucidate the rate of postoperative complications and associated factors in a large cohort of children treated with elastic stable intramedullary nail for diaphyseal tibial fractures at two large pediatric referral centers.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed for demographic clinical and radiographic parameters at injury, surgery, and all subsequent clinical visits until radiographic healing was observed and/or for a minimum of 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients (79.5% male) were included. The mean (SD) age was 11.8 (63.0) years. Radiographic union occurred by 3 months in 56.6% of patients. Nine patients had delayed union, and four had nonunion. By 3 months postoperatively, 97.2% of patients had progressed to full weight bearing and 92.5% had full range of motion of the knee and ankle. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with open fractures were found to be more than eight times at increased risk of developing delayed union (.6 months, odds ratio = 8.71).

CONCLUSION

Elastic stable intramedullary nail remains a safe and effective treatment of open and closed pediatric diaphyseal tibial fractures. A small yet notable risk of residual angular deformity, delayed union, and nonunion remains, although rates may be better than previously reported.

News in paediatric orthopaedic surgery: an overview of the latest advances in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology (2020-2023)

PURPOSE

We propose to survey - even if arbitrarily - the publications in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology that have had the greatest impact on the specialty during the period extending from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2020 and the end of all health restrictions in March 2023.

METHODS

Only studies with a high level of evidence or clinical relevance were selected. We briefly discussed the results and conclusions of these quality articles to situate them in relation to the existing literature and current practice.

RESULTS

Publications are presented by dividing traumatology and orthopaedics whose publications are further subdivided according to anatomical districts; articles concerning neuro-orthopaedics, tumours, and infections were presented separately while sports medicine is jointly presented with knee-related articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the difficulties encountered during the global COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2023), orthopaedic and trauma specialists, including paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, have maintained a high level of scientific output, in terms of quantity and quality of production.