Acetabulotrochanteric distance in slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Novelties in slipped capital femoral epiphysis imaging: A narrative review

Rationale and objectives

Imaging plays a key role in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis diagnosis and severity assessment. In the last two decades, signs and measurements emerged in literature showed potential to help in SCFE diagnosis and tailoring treatment. The purpose of this review is to collect and discuss new imaging signs, measurements, and techniques according to investigations published after 2000 to improve SCFE diagnosis.

Material and methods

The PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct databases were used to search for relevant articles related to imaging in SCFE diagnosis from January 2000 to March 2023. Article selection and review was performed by two board-certified radiologists). Article quality assessment were conducted by authors using QUADAS-2 and SANRA evaluation tools.

Results

The research resulted in a total of 2577 articles. After duplicates removal and abstract analysis, 28 articles were finally selected for full-text analysis. Seventeen articles were focused on Radiographs, 6 on CT, 1 on both Radiographs and CT, 4 on MRI. No study focused on ultrasound was selected.

Conclusions

Use of modified Klein's line and S-sign may improve radiographs accuracy in daily routine. Lucency sign may help in early diagnosis on radiographs. Preoperative CT may be useful in planning a tailored treatment predicting SCFE severity and instability. MRI is the most accurate modality to diagnose SCFE at early stage. Nevertheless, it cannot be used to predict the risk of contralateral SCFE. Risk prediction can be assessed with radiographs, using a new rapid mOBS. Further investigation and validation of these sign is needed.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis with hypopituitarism in adults: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common disease in pediatric orthopedics. Most research on SCFE has focused on high-risk groups or the whole population, and studies focusing on adult SCFE patients are rare. In the present study, we report the case of an adult patient with SCFE.

PATIENT CONCERN

A 37-year-old man presented to our clinic with persistent pain that was poorly localized to both hips, groin regions, and thighs for more than 1 year.

DIAGNOSES

A bilateral hip X-ray examination was performed, and the femoral epiphyses were found to be unfused on both sides. Low levels of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and testosterone, and high levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone, prolactin, and cortisol.

INTERVENTIONS

Hormone-substitution therapies (levothyroxine sodium to treat hypothyroidism and testosterone enanthate to treat hypogonadism) were prescribed. Total hip arthroplasty was performed to treat femoral epiphysis slippage.

OUTCOMES

After 6 months of postoperative follow-up, the patient's gait improved significantly, and bilateral hip pain was relieved.

LESSONS

When treating adults with SCFE, clinicians must be alert to endocrine disorders. Comprehensive imaging evaluation is crucial for the accurate diagnosis and selection of an appropriate treatment.

Causes of Delayed Diagnosis of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The Importance of the Frog Lateral Pelvis Projection

Delayed diagnosis and treatment is a universally reported problem that impairs the prognosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Quite frequently, a delayed diagnosis of SCFE is observed in spite of serial admissions and examinations of the limping adolescent. Why do health professionals globally fail to make a definitive diagnosis of SCFE during the first examination of the patient? A retrospective study of 36 adolescents treated for stable SCFE and two adolescents treated for unstable SCFE has been performed. In more than half of the delayed diagnosed stable slips (13/25, 52%), the diagnosis was set after serial examinations of the patient. Health professionals commonly order only the anteroposterior (AP) X-ray view of the pelvis when examining a non-traumatic limping adolescent. The frog lateral (FL) projection is usually spared in an attempt to limit the radiation exposure of the patient, especially in ambulating adolescents with mild symptoms. It is proposed that in the non-traumatic limping adolescent, the FL projection instead of the AP pelvis view should be requested by the health professional in order to timely diagnose a surgical emergency of the adolescent hip such as SCFE.

Treatment of Unstable Slipped Capital Epiphysis Via the Modified Dunn Procedure

BACKGROUND

The modified Dunn procedure has been shown to be safe and effective in treating unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). We present a consecutive series of unstable SCFE managed by a single surgeon with a focus on timing of surgical intervention, postoperative complications, and radiographic results.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive unstable SCFEs were treated. Demographics, presentation time to time of operation, surgical times, and complications were recorded. Bilateral hip radiographs at latest follow-up were utilized to record slip angle, α angle, greater trochanteric height, and femoral neck length.

RESULTS

Thirty-one consecutive hips in 30 patients were reviewed: 15 males (50%) and 15 females (50%), average age 12.37 years (range, 8.75 to 14.8 y), 20 left hips (65%) and 11 right hips (35%). Mean follow-up was 27.9 months (range, 1 to 82 mo). Time from presentation to intervention averaged 13.9 hours (range, 2.17 to 23.4 h). Two patients (6%) developed avascular necrosis at average 19 weeks postoperative. Three patients (10%) developed mild heterotopic ossification requiring no treatment. Two patients (6%) required removal of symptomatic hardware. One patient had hardware failure and in no patients was nonunion, delayed union, or postoperative hip subluxation/dislocation seen. Three patients (10%) presented with bilateral, stable SCFE requiring contralateral in situ pinning. Five patients (16%) had sequential SCFE requiring treatment with 1 patient having an acute, unstable SCFE 10 months after the previous realignment. Mean postoperative slip angle measured 2.5 degrees (range, +19 to -9.4 degrees) (SD, 7.2), α angle 47.43 degrees (range, 34 to 64 degrees) (SD, 7.49), greater trochanteric height averaged 3.5 mm below the center of femoral head (-17.5 to +25 mm), and mean femoral neck length difference measured -7.75 mm (range, -1.8 to -18.6 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

A single surgeon series of unstable SCFEs treated by a modified Dunn procedure showed a 6% incidence of avascular necrosis and low complication rates at latest follow-up. Radiographs showed restoration of the slip angle, α angle, femoral neck length, and greater trochanteric height. This series reveals the safety and effectiveness of the modified Dunn procedure for unstable SCFE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective review.

Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation

PURPOSE

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a deformity of the proximal femur secondary to widened and unstable physis. In stabilising the slip, gold standard treatments stop growth and involve premature physeal closure, which prevents the remodelling of the acquired deformity and creates a leg length discrepancy that may be significant in younger patients.

METHODS

We measured the impact of placing threaded screws across the proximal femoral physis by measuring the centre-trochanteric distance (CTD) and articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) in participants with or without prophylactic fixation. We then compared the mechanical performance of static (stainless and titanium cannulated Synthes screws) and potentially growing implants (Synthes SCFE screw and Pega Medical Free Gliding screw) in a validated synthetic bone model.

RESULTS

In the review of 30 non-fixed and 60 fixated hips over a mean follow-up of 1.9 years, we have noted a significant difference in pre/post CTD and ATD, as well as the change in CTD and ATD over time. In the biomechanical study, the newer implants allowing growth (Synthes SCFE screw and Pega Medical Free Gliding screw) were both shown to be at least non-inferior.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary deformity of a SCFE in itself alters hip mechanics. Also, as confirmed in this study, there is a secondary deformity that is created by static fixation and relative trochanteric overgrowth. To help remodel mild deformities and prevent secondary trochanteric overgrowth, growing implants seem to be non-inferior to the more standard means of fixation in static testing.