Anterior cervical fusion assessment using reconstructed computed tomographic scans: surgical confirmation of 254 segments

Removal of Retro-Corporeal Compressive Pathology Using Guttering Osteotomy During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Guttering is a technique that creates a tunnel through the vertebral body adjacent to the endplate to remove compressive pathologies behind the vertebral body during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). In this study, we investigated cases of patients who underwent gutter-shaped osteotomy (guttering) to decompress retro-corporeal compressive lesions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Retro-corporeal pathologies causing cord compression cannot be removed using conventional ACDF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 217 patients who underwent ACDF to treat cervical myelopathy and were followed up for ≥1 year were retrospectively reviewed. The fusion rate, subsidence, neck pain visual analog scale (VAS), arm pain VAS, and neck disability index (NDI) were assessed. Results were compared between the guttering (patients for whom guttering was performed) and nonguttering (patients for whom guttering was not performed) groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (16.1%) were included in the guttering group, while 182 patients (83.8%) were included in the nonguttering group. Fusion rates assessed by interspinous motion (P=0.559) and bone bridging on computed tomography (CT) (P=0.541 and 0.715, respectively) were not significantly different between the 2 groups at 1 year after surgery. Furthermore, neck pain VAS (P=0.492), arm pain VAS (P=0.099), and NDI (P=1.000) 1 year after surgery did not demonstrate significant intergroup differences. All patients in the guttering group exhibited healed guttering on 1-year postsurgery CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Guttering as an adjunct to ACDF could provide a more expansive workspace for complete decompression when compressive pathology extends retrocorporeal. This additional bone resection is not associated with increased pseudarthrosis or subsidence or related to aggravation of patient symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Diagnosis of spine pseudoarthrosis based on the biomechanical properties of bone

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Failure to fuse following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may result in symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. Traditional diagnosis involves computerized tomography to detect bridging bone and/or flexion-extension radiographs to assess whether segmental motion is above specific thresholds; however, there are currently no well-validated diagnostic tests. We propose a biomechanically rational approach to achieve a reliable diagnostic test for pseudoarthrosis.

PURPOSE

Develop and test a biomechanically based approach to the diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review, development of theory, re-analysis of a previously published study with surgical exploration as the gold-standard, and retrospective analysis of pooled studies to understand time to fusion.

METHODS

Fully automated methods were used to measure disc space strains (change in disc space height divided by initial height). Measurement error combined with the reported failure strain of trabecular bone led to a proposed strain threshold for diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis following ACDF. We reanalyzed previously reported flexion-extension radiographs for asymptomatic volunteers to assess whether flexion-extension radiographs, in the absence of fusion surgery, can be expected to provide sufficient stress on motion segments to allow for reliable strain-based fusion assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of strain- and rotation-based pseudoarthrosis diagnosis were assessed by reanalysis of previously reported post-ACDF flexion-extension radiographs, where intraoperative fusion assessments were also available. Finally, we assessed changes in strain over time using 9,869 flexion-extension radiographs obtained 6 weeks to 84 months post-ACDF surgery from 1,369 patients.

RESULTS

The estimated error in automated measurement of disc space strain from radiographs was approximately 3%, and the reported failure strain of bridging bone was less than 2.5%. On that basis, we propose a 5% strain threshold for pseudoarthrosis diagnosis. Reanalysis of a study in which intraoperative fusion assessments were available revealed 67% sensitivity and 82% specificity for strain-based diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis, which was comparable to rotation-based diagnosis. Analysis of post-ACDF flexion-extension radiographs revealed rapid strain reduction for up to 24 months, followed by a slower decrease for up to 84 months. When rotation is less than 2 degrees, the strain-based diagnosis differed from the rotation-based diagnosis in approximately 14% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose steps for standardizing diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis based on the failure strain of bone, measurement error, and retrospective data. These steps include obtaining high-quality flexion-extension studies, the application of proposed diagnostic thresholds, and the use of image stabilization for conclusive diagnosis, when motion is near thresholds. The necessity for an accurate diagnosis with minimal radiation exposure underscores the need for further optimization and standardization in diagnosing pseudoarthrosis following ACDF surgery.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

In a symptomatic postspine fusion patient, it is important to diagnose or rule-out pseudoarthrosis. There are currently no well-validated diagnostic tests for this condition. Incorporating strain-based intervertebral motion analysis into the diagnosis could lead to a standardized and validated test for detecting spine pseudoarthrosis.

The incidence of reoperation for pseudarthrosis after cervical spine surgery

INTRODUCTION

Pseudarthrosis after cervical spine surgery represents an underreported and challenging complication. Using a large multi-center surgical database, we sought to: (1) report the incidence of cervical pseudarthrosis, (2) evaluate changes in rates of cervical pseudarthrosis, and (3) describe risk factors for suboptimal outcomes after cervical pseudarthrosis surgery.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2019 was used. The primary outcome was occurrence of a cervical fusion procedure with a prior diagnosis of pseudarthrosis. Fusion for pseudarthrosis was divided into anterior and posterior approaches. Post-operative complications were classified as major or minor. Prolonged LOS was defined as exceeding the 75th percentile for total hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 780 patients underwent cervical fusion for pseudarthrosis, and a significant increase in rates of surgery for pseudarthrosis was seen (0.25-1.2%, p < 0.001). The majority of cervical pseudarthrosis was treated with a posterior approach (66.5%). Postoperatively, 38 (4.9%) patients suffered a complication and 247 (31.7%) had a prolonged LOS. The three strongest risk factors for complications and extended LOS were > 10% weight loss preoperatively, congestive heart failure, and pre-operative bleeding disorder.

CONCLUSION

Results from a large multi-center national database revealed that surgery to treat cervical pseudarthrosis has increased from 2012 to 2019. Most pseudarthrosis was treated with a posterior approach. Reoperation to treat cervical pseudarthrosis carried risk, with 5% having complications and 32% having an extended LOS. These results lay the groundwork for a future prospective study to discern the true incidence of cervical pseudarthrosis and how to best avoid its occurrence.

Structural Allograft Versus Mechanical Interbody Devices Augmented With Osteobiologics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE

Perform a systematic review evaluating postoperative fusion rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using structural allograft vs various interbody devices augmented with different osteobiologic materials.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Included studies were those that reported results of 1-4 levels ACDF using pure structural allograft compared with a mechanical interbody device augmented with an osteobiologic. Excluded studies were those that reported on ACDF with cervical corpectomy; anterior and posterior cervical fusions; circumferential (360° or 540°) fusion or revision ACDF for nonunion or other conditions. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane review guidelines.

RESULTS

8 articles reporting fusion rates of structural allograft and an interbody device/osteobiologic pair were included. All included studies compared fusion rates following ACDF among structural allograft vs non-allograft interbody device/osteobiologic pairs. Fusion rates were reported between 84% and 100% for structural allograft, while fusion rates for various interbody device/osteobiologic combinations ranged from 26% to 100%. Among non-allograft cage groups fusion rates varied from 73-100%. One study found PEEK cages filled with combinations of autograft, allograft, and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) to have an overall fusion rate of 26%. In one study comparing plate and zero-profile constructs, there was no difference in fusion rates for two-level fusions.

CONCLUSION

There was limited data comparing fusion outcomes of patients undergoing ACDF using structural allograft vs interbody devices augmented with osteobiologic materials to support superiority of one method.

Myth or fact: 3D-printed off-the-shelf prosthesis is superior to titanium mesh cage in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion?

BACKGROUND

To find out if three-dimensional printing (3DP) off-the-shelf (OTS) prosthesis is superior to titanium mesh cages in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) when treating single-segment degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy (DCSM).

METHODS

DCSM patients underwent ACCF from January 2016 to January 2019 in a single center were included. Patients were divided into the 3DP group (28) and the TMC group (23). The hospital stays, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the cost of hospitalization were compared. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were recorded pre-operatively, 1 day, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Radiological data was measured to evaluate fusion, subsidence, and cervical lordosis. Patients were sent with SF-36 to assess their health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

The differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay were not statistically significant between groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 2 cases in the 3DP group and 3 cases in the TMC group, which all relieved one week later. The difference in improvement of JOA and NDI between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). No hardware failure was found and bony fusion was achieved in all cases except one in the 3DP group. The difference in cervical lordosis (CL), fused segmental angle (FSA), mean vertebral height (MVH), and subsidence rates between groups at each follow-up time point was not statistically significant and the results of the SF-36 were similar (p > 0.05). The total cost was higher in the 3DP group with its higher graft cost (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In treating single-segment DCSM with ACCF, both 3DP OTS prosthesis and TMC achieved satisfactory outcomes. However, the more costly 3DP OTS prosthesis was not able to reduce subsidence as it claimed.

Fate of pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Prior study has shown that 70% of cervical pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) detected at 1 year will go on to fusion by 2 year. Pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after ACDF may have different bone healing potential compared to nonunion detected 1 year after surgery. Therefore, it might have a different clinical significance.

PURPOSE

To examine the radiographic and clinical prognosis of pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after ACDF with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

A total of 249 patients who completed a 5-year follow-up after ACDF.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Clinical outcomes such as neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS), arm pain VAS, and neck disability index (NDI) and radiographic assessment such as X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan.

METHODS

A total of 249 patients who completed a 5-year follow-up after ACDF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were diagnosed with pseudarthrosis at 2 years postoperatively were included. Fusion, neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI were assessed. The results were compared between the union group (patients who achieved union), and the nonunion group (patients with pseudarthrosis) at 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Among the patients who had pseudarthrosis at 2 years postoperatively, the fusion rate at 5 years was 32.6% (14/43). While the union group showed continued improvements in neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI until 5 years, the nonunion group showed significant worsening of arm pain VAS and NDI at 5 years, with the values of neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI being significantly worse than those of the union group at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of pseudarthrosis detected at 2 years postoperatively after ACDF was 67.4%, and it remained unfused at 5 years postoperatively. Nonunion identified 2 years after ACDF may be considered a poor prognostic factor because it has less potential to achieve fusion with further follow-up and a higher chance of worsening clinical symptoms. Therefore, the presence of fusion at the 2-year follow-up can be considered an indicator of the success of the surgery.

Which Radiographic Parameter Can Aid in Deciding Optimal Allograft Height for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To identify preoperative radiographic parameters that can guide optimal allograft height selection for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Allograft height selection for ACDF depends on intraoperative assessment supported by trials; however, there is currently no radiographic reference parameter that could aid in allograft height selection for improved outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 148 patients who underwent ACDF using allografts and were followed up for more than 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Fusion rates, subsidence, segmental lordosis, and foraminal height were assessed. Segments were divided into 2 groups according to whether the inserted allograft height was within 1 mm from the following 3 reference radiographic parameters: (1) uncinate process height, (2) adjacent disc height, and (3) preoperative disc height +2 mm.

RESULTS

This study included 101 patients with 163 segments. Segments with an allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm had a significantly higher fusion rate at 1-year follow-up compared with segments with allograft-uncinate height difference of >1 mm [85/107 (79.4%) vs. 35/56 (62.5%); P =0.025]. Subsidence, segmental lordosis, and foraminal height did not significantly differ between the groups when segments were divided according to uncinate height. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm and allograft failure were factors associated with fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The uncinate process height can guide optimal allograft height selection for ACDF. Using an allograft with an allograft-uncinate height difference of ≤1 mm resulted in a higher fusion rate. Therefore, the uncinate process height should be checked preoperatively and used in conjunction with intraoperative assessment when selecting allograft height.

Efficacy and safety of oblique posterior endplate resection for wider decompression (trumpet-shaped decompression) during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) provides a limited workspace, and surgeons often need to access the posterior aspect of the vertebral body to achieve sufficient decompression. Oblique resection of the posterior endplate (trumpet-shaped decompression [TSD]) widens the workspace, enabling removal of lesions behind the vertebral body. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oblique posterior endplate resection for wider decompression.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 227 patients who underwent ACDF for the treatment of cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy caused by spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and were followed up for ≥ 1 year were included. Patient characteristics, fusion rates, subsidence, and patient-reported outcome measures, including the neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, arm pain VAS score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI), were assessed. Patients who underwent TSD during ACDF (TSD group) and those who underwent surgery without TSD (non-TSD group) were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (25.1%) were included in the TSD group and 170 patients (74.9%) in the non-TSD group. In the TSD group, 28.2% ± 5.5% of the endplate was resected, and 26.0% ± 6.1% of the region behind the vertebral body could be visualized via the TSD technique. The resection angle was 26.9° ± 5.9°. The fusion rate assessed on the basis of interspinous motion, intragraft bone bridging, and extragraft bone bridging did not significantly differ between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no significant intergroup differences in subsidence. The patient-reported outcome measures at the 1-year follow-up were also not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TSD widened the workspace during ACDF, and 26% of the region posterior to the vertebral body could be accessed using this technique. The construct stability was not adversely affected by TSD as demonstrated by the similar fusion and subsidence rates among patients who underwent TSD and those who did not. Therefore, TSD can be safely applied during ACDF when compressive lesions extend behind the vertebral body and are not limited to the disc space, enabling adequate decompression without disrupting the construct stability.

The Significance of Extra-Cage Bridging Bone via Radiographic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Criterion

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analysis the distributional patterns of the intra- and extra-cage bridging bone (InCBB and ExCBB) and the significance of ExCBB using suggested lumbar interbody fusion criterion.

METHODS

This study included the patients with planned single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. We divided bridging bone into InCBB (in void of right or left cage) and ExCBB (outside of cages; anterior, posterior, intermediate, right, or left) and graded bridging scores from 0 to 2 on postoperative 1-year computed tomography. The fusion was defined as at least having one or more graded 2 and the evaluation were conducted twice by 2 raters.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled. All values of intra- and inter-rater reliability in left InCBB, anterior, and posterior ExCBB showed good agreements (≥0.75). Both InCBBs showed similar mean bridging scores (Rt:1.43 vs Lt:1.48), and in ExCBBs, the anterior was the highest (1.43), followed by the posterior (1.14); the right and left were the lowest (0.49 and 0.52 respectively). In subjects determined as fusion (85.4%), complete bridging was observed more in ExCBB (88.8%) than in InCBB (69.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the higher bridging scores in both InCBBs and Ant. ExCBB, bone grafting is important promoting factor to increase the interbody bridging bone regardless of outside or in void of cages. Based on our suggested criterion, ExCBB has a greater proportion compared to InCBBs for determining the fusion and extra-cage bone grafting should be considered as important procedures for interbody fusion.

Anterior Plate-Screws and Lower Postoperative T1 Slope Affect Cervical Allospacer Failures in Multi-Level ACDF Surgery: Anterior Versus Posterior Fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

In ACDF, graft failure and subsidence are common complications of surgery. Depending on the cervical fixation, different biomechanical characteristics are applied on the grafts. This aims to describe the incidence of cervical spacer failure in patients with cervical degenerative condition according to the cervical fixation method and sagittal balance.

METHOD

From November 2011 to December 2015, 262 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery were enrolled prospectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on fixation method: anterior plate/screw (APS), posterior lateral mass screw (LMS), pedicle screw (PPS) groups. Serial X-rays and CT scans were utilized to evaluate radiologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean patient ages were 56.1 years in the APS group, 61.5 years in the LMS group, and 57.6 years in the PPS group (P = 0.002). Allospacer failure was most common in the APS group, compared to the LMS and PPS groups (chi-square, P = 0.038). Longer fusion level was associated with greater allospacer failure (Baseline 2 level surgery; Odds ratio (OR) 3.4 in 3 level, 15.2 in 4 level, P = 0.036,0.013). Higher T1 slope was correlated with less allospacer failure (OR 0.875, P = 0.001). ORs of allospacer failure in the LMS and PPS groups were 0.04 and 0.02, respectively, (P = 0.01, 0.01), compared with the APS group.

CONCLUSION

This study was able to show that allospacer failure in multi-level ACDF surgery is more common with a longer fusion length, less postoperative T1 slope, and an anterior plate-screws technique. Pedicle screws provided the best biomechanical stability among the 3 constructs.

Assessment of Fusion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm

BACKGROUND

A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a deep learning (DL) model specialized for image processing, analysis, and classification.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated whether a CNN model using lateral cervical spine radiographs as input data can help assess fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic imaging study using DL.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included 187 patients who underwent ACDF and fusion assessment with postoperative one-year computed tomography and neutral and dynamic lateral cervical spine radiographs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The performance of the CNN-based DL algorithm was evaluated in terms of accuracy and area under the curve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fusion or nonunion was confirmed by cervical spine computed tomography. Among the 187 patients, 69.5% (130 patients) were randomly selected as the training set, and the remaining 30.5% (57 patients) were assigned to the validation set to evaluate model performance. Radiographs of the cervical spine were used as input images to develop a CNN-based DL algorithm. The CNN algorithm used three radiographs (neutral, flexion, and extension) per patient and showed the diagnostic results as fusion (0) or nonunion (1) for each radiograph. By combining the results of the three radiographs, the final decision for a patient was determined to be fusion (fusion ≥2) or nonunion (fusion ≤1). By combining the results of the three radiographs, the final decision for a patient was determined as fusion (fusion ≥2) or nonunion (nonunion ≤1).

RESULTS

The CNN-based DL model demonstrated an accuracy of 89.5% and an area under the curve of 0.889 (95% confidence interval, 0.793-0.984).

CONCLUSION

The CNN algorithm for fusion assessment after ACDF trained using lateral cervical radiographs showed a relatively high diagnostic accuracy of 89.5% and is expected to be a useful aid in detecting pseudarthrosis.

Morphologic Change of CorticoCancellous Allograft Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical implications of graft morphologic changes in corticocancellous allografts used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as graft resorption or fracture.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although cortico-cancellous allograft is one of the most commonly used interbody spacer for ACDF, clinical implications of allograft resorption or fracture is unclear.

METHODS

One-hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for degenerative cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with allograft morphologic changes, including graft resorption and fracture (morphologic change group), were compared with patients without morphologic changes (unchanged group). Furthermore, operated segments with morphologic changes were compared with unchanged segments. Patient characteristics, cervical lordosis, segmental lordosis, fusion, subsidence, neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS), arm pain VAS, and neck disability index (NDi) scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (149 segments) were included in the study. Allograft resorption or fracture was detected in 46 (51.1%) patients and 81 (54.3%) segments, respectively. The fusion rate of morphologic change segments was significantly lower than that of the unchanged segments (P < 0.001). Furthermore, segments with morphologic changes had significantly higher rates of subsidence compared to unchanged segments ( P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis at the final follow-up was significantly smaller in the morphologic change segments ( P < 0.001). Neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI scores did not demonstrate significant intergroup differences.

CONCLUSION

Corticocancellous allograft demonstrated a high rate of graft morphologic change (54.3%). Graft resorption or fracture was associated with increased pseudarthrosis, subsidence, and decreased postoperative segmental lordosis; however, the clinical results were not significantly affected. Caution is needed when choosing to use corticocancellous allografts for ACDF due to the high rate of graft resorption or fracture and the negative implications of these risks.

Significance of Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy as a Surgical Strategy for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) has previously been reported as a technique to decompress ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) by translating the vertebral body anteriorly. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical efficacies of VBSO and clarify the surgical indications of VBSO for treating myelopathy caused by OPLL.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with symptomatic OPLL-induced cervical myelopathy treated with VBSO or laminoplasty who were followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical alignment, range of motion, fusion, modified K-line (mK-line) status, and minimum interval between ossified mass and mK-line (INT_(min)), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were assessed. Patients in the VBSO group were compared with those who underwent laminoplasty.

RESULTS

Cervical lordosis and INT_(min) significantly increased in the VBSO group. All patients in the VBSO group assessed as mK-line (-) preoperatively were assessed as mK-line (+) postoperatively. However, in the LMP group, the mK-line status changed from (+) preoperatively to (-) postoperatively in 3 patients. Final JOA score (p = 0.02) and JOA score improvement (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the VBSO group. JOA recovery ratio (p = 0.03) and proportion of patients with a recovery rate ≥50% were significantly higher in the VBSO group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

VBSO is an effective surgical option for OPLL-induced myelopathy, demonstrating favorable neurological recovery and lordosis restoration with low complication rates. It is best indicated for kyphotic alignment, OPLL with a high space-occupying ratio, and OPLL involving ≤3 segments.

Segmental Height Decrease Adversely Affects Foraminal Height and Cervical Lordosis, But Not Clinical Outcome After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Allografts

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to elucidate the clinical significance of postoperative segmental height decrease (SHD) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using allografts.

METHODS

We reviewed 88 patients who underwent ACDF using allografts as interbody spacers. Cervical lordosis, segmental lordosis, segmental height, foraminal height, fusion, allograft fracture, and resorption were assessed. Significant SHD was defined as that ≥2 mm. Neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, arm pain VAS score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) score were also recorded. Significant segmental height decreased (SH-D) segments were compared with segmental height maintained (SH-M) segments.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (36.4%) and 34 segments (23.1%) demonstrated significant SHD. SH-D segments demonstrated significantly lower segmental lordosis (3.7 ± 4.1 vs. 0.9 ± 4.8°; P < 0.01), foraminal height (9.6 ± 1.1 vs. 8.7 ± 0.9 mm; P < 0.01), and fusion rate (88 [77.9%] vs. 20 [58.9%]; P = 0.04) than SH-M segments at the final follow-up, respectively. Furthermore, global lordosis was significantly lower in the SH-D group (18.3 ± 8.5 vs. 13.9 ± 8.9°, respectively; P = 0.02). However, neck and arm pain VAS scores and NDI score did not demonstrate a significant difference between patients with and without significant SHD. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that higher allograft height (P = 0.03), greater allograft anteroposterior length (P = 0.04), and allograft resorption or fracture (P < 0.01) were associated with increased risk of significant SHD. Logistic regression analysis also demonstrated that allograft resorption or fracture (P < 0.01) was associated with risk of nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant SHD was associated with decreased segmental lordosis, global cervical lordosis, and foraminal height. However, significant SHD did not result in worsening of clinical symptoms. Larger allograft size was associated with risk of significant SHD. This study demonstrates provisional results that suggest allograft resorption or fracture may be a factor that adversely affects fusion or SHD.

Anterior Bridging Bone in a Newly Designed Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the distribution of multiple anterior bridging bone (ABB) patterns using a newly designed interbody cage with 4 anterior holes that enable communication between the inside and outside of the cage and to estimate its mechanical effect by finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

Patients underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion using ABB cages. Two raters evaluated the distribution patterns of ABB on computed tomography scans 1 year after surgery. We defined the term H-fusion as the presence of complete anterior extracage and intracage bone bridging, with ≥1 ABBs between them. We performed finite element analysis to investigate the effect of ABB on maximal stiffness.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 98 patients. ABB was most frequently observed in the medial hole of the cages (73.7%). The mean number of ABBs was 3.65, and H-fusion was observed at 135 levels (34%). Postoperative improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index was significantly higher in patients who achieved interbody fusion and H-fusion than in patients who did not. As ABB was added, the increment in the relative maximal stiffness was most affected under flexion and extension forces.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed an average of 3.65 complete ABBs. Finite element analysis demonstrated that ABB could increase the stability in fused segments, especially under flexion and extension stress. Our results suggest that the ABB cage, which allows communicating cross-bridging between inside and outside of the cage, may facilitate a more stable fusion process than a conventionally designed cage.

Fusion and subsidence rates of vertebral body sliding osteotomy: Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques for multilevel cervical myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) was previously reported as a technique to decompress spinal canal by translating the vertebral body anteriorly and is indicated for cervical myelopathy caused by spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. However, little is known about its fusion and subsidence rates.

PURPOSE

To compare the fusion and subsidence rates of VBSO, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred sixty-eight patients who underwent VBSO, ACDF, or ACCF for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and were followed-up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Fusion and subsidence rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck pain, neck disability index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were assessed.

METHODS

Results of the VBSO, ACDF, and ACCF groups were compared using Student's t-test and chi-square test.

RESULTS

The fusion rate at 1-year postoperatively and the final follow-up for VBSO was 92.9% (37/42). VBSO demonstrated a higher 1-year fusion rate than ACDF (77.9% [74/95], p=0.04) and ACCF (74.2% [23/31], p=0.04). However, the fusion rate at the final follow-up did not demonstrate significant difference. The mean amount of subsidence (ACDF group, 1.5±1.2 mm; VBSO group, 1.5±1.5 mm; p=1.00) and rate of significant subsidence of > 3 mm (ACDF group, 13.7% [13/95]; VBSO group, 14.3% [6/42]; p=1.00) were similar for ACDF and VBSO. Furthermore, the mean amount of subsidence in VBSO was significantly less than that in ACCF (1.5±1.5 mm vs 2.4±2.0 mm; p=0.04). Neck pain VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were not significantly different among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

VBSO demonstrated faster solid union than ACDF and ACCF, although the fusion rates at the final follow-up were similar. VBSO resulted in less subsidence than ACCF at the 1-year follow-up. VBSO could be applied safely when the shape and/or location of the pathologic foci and sagittal alignment favor its application without much concern for pseudarthrosis or subsidence.

Comparison between selective caudal fixed screw construct and all variable screw construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

This retrospective comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of selective caudal fixed screw constructs with all variable screw constructs in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Thirty-five patients who underwent surgery using selective caudal fixed screw construct (SF group) were compared with 44 patients who underwent surgery using all variable constructs (AV group). The fusion rate, subsidence, adjacent level ossification development (ALOD), adjacent segmental disease (ASD), and plate-adjacent disc space distance were assessed. The one-year fusion rates assessed by computed tomography bone bridging and interspinous motion as well as the significant subsidence rate did not differ significantly between the AV and SF groups. The ALOD and ASD rates and plate-adjacent disc space distances did not significantly differ between the two groups at both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels. The number of operated levels was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in the logistic regression analysis. The stability provided by the locking mechanism of the fixed screw did not lead to an increased fusion rate at the caudal level. Therefore, the screw type should be selected based on individual patient’s anatomy and surgeon’s experience without concern for increased complications caused by screw type.

A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Local Autografts and Allografts in Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a StandAlone Cage

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Purpose

To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using local graft and allograft

Overview of Literature

The choice of bone grafts for ACDF varies among different types: iliac crest, allograft, and substitutes. Availability, cost, and donor site morbidity are potential disadvantages. Local osteophyte grafts are then advantageous and shows to have good fusion.

Methods

We randomly sampled participants requiring a single level ACDF for degenerative conditions (n=27) between allograft (n=13) and local graft (n=14) groups. Follow-up of patients occurred at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year using Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) scores for arm and neck pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), 2-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and lateral disk height. We then assessed radiological fusion using computed tomography (CT) scan at 12 months, and graded as F− (no fusion), F (fusion seen through the cage), F+ (fusion seen through the cage, with bridging bone at one lateral edge), and F++ (fusion seen through cage with bridging bone bilaterally).

Results

There were no significant differences in the age, sex, duration of intervention, blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups (p>0.05). Both groups showed significant improvements in all functional outcome scores including NPRS for arm and neck pain, NDI, and SF-12 at each visit (p<0.01). We observed a marked improvement in disk height in both groups (p<0.05), but at 1 year of follow-up, there was a significant though slight subsidence (p=0.47). CT at 1 year showed no non-unions. We recorded F, F+, and F++ grades of fusion in 23.2%, 38.4%, and 38.4% in allograft group and 28.6%, 42.8%, and 28.6% in local graft group, respectively, though no significant differences observed (p=0.73).

Conclusions

Marginal osteophytes are effective as graft inside cages for ACDF, since they provide similar radiological outcomes, and equivalent improvements in functional outcomes, as compared to allografts.

Mid-Term and Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Carbon I/F Stand-Alone Cage in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The current study was undertaken to determine the midterm and long-term radiological outcomes, complications and functional status of patients who underwent a single-level anterior interbody lumbar fusion (ALIF) procedure.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Low back pain affects 70%-90% of the general population at some point in their life, and in general, the majority are best treated by nonsurgical therapy. However, a lumbar fusion can be considered in selected cases. In previous decades, lumbar interbody fusion procedures have gained popularity. Despite the approach used, stand-alone interbody fusion is becoming less popular due to poor fusion rates. When studying ALIF procedures, the addition of instrumentation results in higher fusion rates. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up can give either unexpected or similar insights into certain procedures that should be available in the current literature. Therefore, the current study was undertaken to determine the midterm and long-term radiological outcomes, complications, and functional status of patients who underwent a single-level ALIF procedure.

METHODS

A cohort of 50 patients was studied following stand-alone ALIF for midterm and long-term follow-up of 6.6 years and 19.7 years, respectively. Primary outcome measurements were disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and pain scores using the visual analog scale, and the MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to evaluate the quality of life. In addition, radiographic assessment was performed to indicate the number of solid fusions.

RESULTS

After a mean of 19.7 years, we had a loss to follow-up of 34%. Functional measurements revealed an ODI of 41 for both time points and an SF-36 physical component score around 41.4 and 40.8 for the midterm and long-term follow-up, respectively. The mental component of the SF-36 was 48.7 and 49.9, respectively. The assessment of interbody fusion revealed only 66% and 70% solid fusion after 6.6 years and 19.7 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In concordance with previous studies, the outcome of midterm and long-term results in this study showed that the I/F cage in ALIF procedures is a safe treatment option for single-level interbody fusion. The radiological results corroborate literature regarding stand-alone interbody fusion, and additional instrumentation is likely to increase fusion rates. However, functional measurements reveal that the postsurgical situation remains likely worse than patients in a healthy Dutch population but possibly better that in a back pain population.

Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan-based criteria compared with surgical exploration for the analysis of cervical fusion and nonunion

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT) scans are accepted as the imaging standard of reference to define union after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, ideal CT criteria to diagnose union have not been identified or validated. The objective of this study was to analyze the diagnostic value of 9 CT-based criteria and identify the ideal criteria among them to assess cervical fusion after ACDF using surgical exploration as the standard of reference.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective radiographic study of a single surgeon's prospective assessment of osseous fusion during cervical revision surgery by analyzing complete radiographic data in 44 patients who underwent anterior cervical revision surgery due to symptomatic suspected nonunion or adjacent level disease. All patients received standard preoperative CT scans, which were assessed by an independent radiologist to evaluate 9 diagnostic criteria for osseous union. During revision surgery, scar tissue was removed and manual segmental translation tests were performed. Nonunion was defined by visualized motion at the treated ACDF level.

RESULTS

In total, 44 patients were included in the study (30 men; patient age 54 ± 6 years, BMI 28 ± 5 kg/m2). For analysis of fusion, 75 cervical levels were explored, of which 61 levels (81%) showed intraoperative movement indicating nonunion. Statistical analysis showed that of the 9 parameters used to diagnose bone union, "bridging bone on ≥ 3 CT slices" yielded the highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (58%). Multivariate analysis revealed that prediction accuracy was not increased if several criteria were combined to determine fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that the best indicator of bone union was the item bridging bone on ≥ 3 CT slices. Combining the scoring of more than one criterion did not increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Biomechanical investigation of extragraft bone formation influences on the operated motion segment after anterior cervical spinal discectomy and fusion

Although the clinical importance of extragraft bone formation (ExGBF) and bridging (ExGBB) has been reported, few studies have investigated the biomechanical influences of ExGBF on the motion segment. In this study, ExGBF was simulated at the C5-C6 motion segment after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a developed finite element model and a sequential bone-remodelling algorithm in flexion and extension. The computer simulation results showed that extragraft bone was primarily formed in the extension motion and grew to form ExGBB. A stepwise decrease in the intersegmental rotation angle, maximum von Mises stress and strain energy density on the trabecular bone with ExGBF were predicted in extension. When ExGBB was formed in the trabecular bone region, the intersegmental rotation angle slightly decreased with additional bone formation. However, the stress and strain energy density on the trabecular bone region decreased until ExGBB reached the peripheral cortical margin. The results offer a rationale supporting the hypothesis that mechanical stimuli influence ExGBF. ExGBF was helpful in increasing the stability of the motion segment and decreasing the fracture risk of trabecular bones, even in cases in which ExGBB was not formed. ExGBB can be classified as either soft or hard bridging based on a biomechanical point of view.

Feasibility of local bone dust as a graft material in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

OBJECTIVE

Local bone dust has been used previously as a substitute cage filling material for iliac bone grafts during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the impacts of local bone dust on fusion rate and clinical results remain unclear. Extragraft bone bridging (ExGBB) is a reliable CT finding indicating segmental fusion. This study was conducted to compare fusion rates for the use of local bone dust or an iliac auto bone graft during ACDF surgery and to evaluate the effect of implanting bone graft outside the cage.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients who underwent ACDF at a single institution were included. An iliac bone graft was used as the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filling graft material in 43 patients (iliac crest [IC] group). In the IC group, bone graft material was inserted only inside the cage. Local bone dust was used in 50 patients (local bone [LB] group). Bone graft material was inserted both inside and outside the cage in the LB group. Segmental fusion was assessed by 1) interspinous motion (ISM), 2) intragraft bone bridging (InGBB), and 3) ExGBB. Fusion rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The neck and arm pain VAS scores and NDI score improved significantly in both groups. Fusion rates assessed by ISM and InGBB did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the fusion rate in the LB group was significantly higher than that in the IC group when assessed by ExGBB (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Using local bone dust as cage filling material resulted in fusion rates similar to those for an iliac bone graft, while avoiding potential complications and pain caused by iliac bone harvesting. A higher rate of extragraft bone bridge formation was achieved by implanting local bone dust outside the cage.

What is the most accurate radiographic criterion to determine anterior cervical fusion?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The accuracy of radiographic criteria for determining anterior cervical fusion remains controversial, and inconsistency in the literature makes a comparison of published clinical results problematic. The descriptions of bridging bone are still lacking and subjective, and the interpretation of images can be influenced by the type of graft or cage used.

PURPOSE

To assess and validate the diagnostic accuracies of four radiographic fusion criteria using the results of surgical exploration.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, radiographic, and comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study included patients who required anterior or posterior exploration of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis level(s) ranging from C3-C4 to C7-T1 for suspected pseudarthrosis or adjacent-segment pathologies. They underwent radiologic examinations to determine the four fusion criteria. We included patients whose images were taken at least 1 year after the index surgery, and 82 patients with 151 cervical segments were enrolled.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The inter- and intra-rater reliabilities and validity that correlated with the results of surgical exploration for the four fusion criteria were assessed using data (fusion or not) that were collected by two raters.

METHODS

The four published radiographic fusion criteria were interspinous motion (ISM) < 1 mm and superjacent ISM ≥ 4 mm, seen on dynamic radiographs; conventional bridging bone, as seen on computed tomography (CT) scans; and extra-graft bridging bone (ExGBB) and intragraft bridging bone (InGBB), observed on multi-axial reconstructed CT scans. The criteria were evaluated by two raters (spine surgeons with 5 and 7 years of experience). The raters evaluated each criterion twice at two different time points, 3 to 4 weeks apart. First, ISM and conventional bridging bone on CT scans were evaluated, followed by ExGBB and InGBB, with a time interval of 4 months. This Research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Research Grants (less than 5,000 US dollars) in 2016.

RESULTS

The inter- and intra-rater reliability values of the ExGBB (0.887-0.933) criteria were the highest, followed by those for the ISM (0.860-0.906), bridging bone (0.755-0.907), and InGBB (0.656-0.695) criteria. The validity values that correlated with the exploration results were the highest for the ExGBB criteria (k=0.889), followed by the ISM (k=0.776), bridging bone (k=0.757), and InGBB (k=0.656) criteria and ExGBB showed the highest sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (98.4%). Regarding the graft materials that were used, all criteria had the highest values in the auto-cortical group and lowest values in the cage group. Of note, sensitivity and specificity of ExGBB were 100% in autocortical group. In the cage group, the validity values for the ExGBB (k=0.663) and ISM (k=0.666) criteria were higher than those for the bridging bone (k=0.504) and InGBB (k=0.308) criteria CONCLUSION: The presence of ExGBB (anterior, posterior, or lateral to the graft or cage) correlated the best with surgical exploration. The ISM criteria demonstrated a similar accuracy to that of conventional bridging bone criteria on CT scans. In arthrodesed segments with auto-cortical bone, criteria showed the highest validity values. In cage group, ISM and ExGBB had acceptable accuracy, but the conventional bridging bone and InGBB were worse than guessing. We recommend that ISM and ExGBB criteria should be used to increase accuracy in patients who undergo arthrodesis with cages.

Radiological Fusion Criteria of Postoperative Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Diagnosis of pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical fusion is difficult, and often depends on the surgeon's subjective assessment because recommended radiographic criteria are lacking. This review evaluated the available evidence for confirming fusion after anterior cervical surgery.

METHODS

Articles describing assessment of anterior cervical fusion were retrieved from MEDLINE and SCOPUS. The assessment methods and fusion rates at 1 and 2 years were evaluated to identify reliable radiographical criteria.

RESULTS

Ten fusion criteria were described. The 4 most common were presence of bridging trabecular bone between the endplates, absence of a radiolucent gap between the graft and endplate, absence of or minimal motion between adjacent vertebral bodies on flexion-extension radiographs, and absence of or minimal motion between the spinous processes on flexion-extension radiographs. The mean fusion rates were 90.2% at 1 year and 94.7% at 2 years. The fusion rate at 2 years had significant independence (P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

The most common fusion criteria, bridging trabecular bone between the endplates and absence of a radiolucent gap between the graft and endplate, are subjective. We recommend using <1 mm of motion between spinous processes on extension and flexion to confirm fusion.

Diagnosing Pseudoarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Radiographic confirmation of fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery is a critical aspect of determining surgical success. However, there is a lack of established diagnostic radiographic parameters for pseudoarthrosis. The purpose of this study is to summarize the findings of previous studies, review the advantages and disadvantages of frequently employed diagnostic criteria, and present our recommended protocol of fusion assessment. This study identified randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies reporting on spinal fusion and how successful fusion after ACDF. Among the 39 articles reviewed, bridging bone across the operated levels on static radiographs was the most commonly used criteria to confirm fusion (31 of 39, 79%). Dynamic flexion-extension radiographs were used to assess for interspinous movement (ISM) (22 of 39, 56.4%) and change in Cobb angle (12 of 39, 30.8%). Computed tomography (CT) based findings (21 of 39, 53.8%) were employed in ambiguous cases with improved sensitivity and specificity. Reconstructed CT scans were used to assess for intragraft bridging bone and extragraft bridging bone (ExGBB). ExGBB were proved to have the highest diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for pseudoarthrosis detection when compared to all other radiographic criteria. The ISM <1 mm on dynamic flexion-extension radiographs had high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well. After our reviewing, we recommend using dynamic lateral flexion-extension cervical spine radiographs at 150% magnificationin which the interspinous motion <1 mm and superjacent interspinous motion ≥4 mm confirms fusion. In ambiguous cases, we recommend using reconstructed CT scans to evaluate for ExGBB.

The Formation of Extragraft Bone Bridging after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

Objective

In addition to bone bridging inside a cage or graft (intragraft bone bridging, InGBB), extragraft bone bridging (ExGBB) is commonly observed after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a stand-alone cage. However, solid bony fusion without the formation of ExGBB might be a desirable condition. We hypothesized that an insufficient contact area for InGBB might be a causative factor for ExGBB. The objective was to determine the minimal area of InGBB by finite element analysis.

Methods

A validated 3-dimensional, nonlinear ligamentous cervical segment (C3-7) finite element model was used. This study simulated a single-level ACDF at C5-6 with a cylindroid interbody graft. The variables were the properties of the incorporated interbody graft (cancellous bone [Young's modulus of 100 or 300 MPa] to cortical bone [10000 MPa]) and the contact area between the vertebra and interbody graft (Graft-area, from 10 to 200 mm²). Interspinous motion between the flexion and extension models of less than 2 mm was considered solid fusion.

Results

The minimal Graft-areas for solid fusion were 190 mm², 140 mm², and 100 mm² with graft properties of 100, 300, and 10000 MPa, respectively. The minimal Graft-areas were generally unobtainable with only the formation of InGBB after the use of a commercial stand-alone cage.

Conclusion

ExGBB may be formed to compensate for insufficient InGBB. Although various factors may be involved, solid fusion with less formation of ExGBB may be achieved with refinements in biomaterials, such as the use of osteoinductive cage materials; changes in cage design, such as increasing the area of polyetheretherketone or the inside cage area for bone grafts; or surgical techniques, such as the use of plate/screw systems.

Radiological Determination of Postoperative Cervical Fusion: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine best criteria for radiological determination of postoperative subaxial cervical fusion to be applied to current clinical practice and ongoing future research assessing fusion to standardize assessment and improve comparability.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite availability of multiple imaging modalities and criteria, there remains no method of determining cervical fusion with absolute certainty, nor clear consensus on specific criteria to be applied.

METHODS

A systematic search in MEDLINE/Cochrane Collaboration Library (through March 2014). Included studies assessed C2 to C7 via anterior or posterior approach, at 12 weeks or more postoperative, with any graft or implant. Overall body of evidence with respect to 6 posited key questions was determined using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality precepts.

RESULTS

Of plain radiographical modalities, there is moderate evidence that the interspinous process motion method (<1 mm) is more accurate than the Cobb angle method for assessing anterior cervical fusion. Of the advanced imaging modalities, there is moderate evidence that computed tomography (CT) is more accurate and reliable than magnetic resonance imaging in assessing anterior cervical fusion. There is insufficient evidence regarding the optimal modality and criteria for assessing posterior cervical fusions and insufficient evidence to support a single time point after surgery as being optimal for determining fusion, although some evidence suggest that reliability of radiography and CT improves with increasing time postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

We recommend using less than 1-mm motion as the initial modality for determining anterior cervical arthrodesis for both clinical and research applications. If further imaging is needed because of indeterminate radiographical evaluation, we recommend CT, which has relatively high accuracy and reliability, but due to greater radiation exposure and cost, it is not routinely suggested. We recommend that plain radiographs also be the initial method of determining posterior cervical fusion but suggest a lower threshold for obtaining CT scans because dynamic radiographs may not be as useful if spinous processes have been removed by laminectomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Revision surgery for failed cervical spine reconstruction: review article

BACKGROUND

As the number of cervical spine procedures performed continues to increase, the need for revision surgery is also likely to increase. Surgeons need to understand the etiology of post-surgical changes, as well as have a treatment algorithm when evaluating these complex patients.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This study aims to review the rates and etiology of revision cervical spine surgery as well as describe our treatment algorithm.

METHODS

We used a narrative and literature review. We performed a MEDLINE (PubMed) search for "cervical" and "spine" and "revision" which returned 353 articles from 1993 through January 22, 2014. Abstracts were analyzed for relevance and 32 articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

The rates of revision surgery on the cervical spine vary by the type and extent of procedure performed. Patient evaluation should include a detailed history and review of the indication for the index procedure, as well as lab work to rule out infection. Imaging studies including flexion/extension radiographs and computed tomography are obtained to evaluate potential pseudarthrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging is helpful to evaluate the disc, neural elements, soft tissue, and to differentiate scar from infection. Sagittal alignment should be corrected if necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent or new symptoms after cervical spine reconstruction can be effectively treated with revision surgery after identifying the etiology, and completing the appropriate workup.

Functional computed tomography scanning for evaluating fusion status after anterior cervical decompression fusion

INTRODUCTION

Nonunion is a major complication of anterior cervical fusion that causes poor outcomes and occasionally requires additional operative intervention. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of functional computed tomography (CT) scanning for determining fusion status after anterior cervical fusion by comparing with functional radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The fusion status in 59 patients treated by anterior cervical fusion was assessed by functional radiography and functional CT scanning at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Fusion rates and clinical symptoms were evaluated. Fusion on functional radiography was defined as less than 2 mm of motion between adjacent spinous processes and a particular bony trabeculation on functional CT; fusion was defined as nonexistence of a clear zone or a gas pattern and a particular bone connection on reconstructed sagittal-view images.

RESULTS

Functional radiographs demonstrated solid fusion in 83.9% at 6 months and 91.1% at 12 months postoperatively; functional CT showed solid fusion in 55.3 and 78.6%, respectively. The fusion rate detected on functional CT images was significantly lower than that on functional radiographs at each period. At 6 months postoperatively, patients with incomplete union on functional CT were more likely to have neck pain than those who had complete union on functional CT. (46.2 vs 13.3%, P < 0.05) CONCLUSION: Functional CT can detect nonunion more clearly than functional radiography. At 6 months postoperatively, patients with incomplete union on functional CT images were likely to have more neck pain. Functional CT may allow accurate detection of symptomatic nonunion after anterior cervical fusion.