In vivo cervical facet joint capsule deformation during flexion-extension

In vivo cervical vertebrae kinematic studies based on dual fluoroscopic imaging system measurement: A narrative review

Understanding the motion characteristics of cervical spine through biomechanical analysis aids in the identification of abnormal joint movements. This knowledge is essential for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of related disorders. However, the anatomical structure of the cervical spine is complex, and traditional medical imaging techniques have certain limitations. Capturing the movement characteristics of various parts of the cervical spine in vivo during motion is challenging. The dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) is able to quantify the motion and motion patterns of individual segments. In recent years, DFIS has achieved accurate non-invasive measurements of dynamic joint movements in humans. This review assesses the research findings of DFIS about the cervical spine in healthy and pathological individuals. Relevant study search was conducted up to October 2023 in Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCO databases. After the search, a total of 30 studies were ultimately included. Among them, 13 studies focused on healthy cervical spines, while 17 studies focused on pathological cervical spines. These studies mainly centered on exploring the vertebral bodies and associated structures of the cervical spine, including intervertebral discs, intervertebral foramina, and zygapophyseal joints. Further research could utilize DFIS to investigate cervical spine motion in different populations and under pathological conditions.

Analysis of Functional Outcomes and Risk Factors for Facet Joint Distraction During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify functional outcomes of facet joint distraction (FJD) and identify specific risk factors for excessive FJD during single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent single-level ACDF for CSM from January 2016 to May 2020. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained before surgery and 12 months after surgery. Radiographic parameters including anterior intervertebral height (AIH), posterior intervertebral height, facet joint gap, cage posterior depth (CPD), upper vertebral length, cervical segmental Cobb angle (CSCA), C2-C7 Cobb angle, and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis were analyzed. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score, visual analog scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI).

RESULTS

Comparison between the appropriate FJD and excessive FJD groups showed statistically significant differences in the NDI, VAS, CPD, and ΔAIH (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent factors associated with excessive FJD were as follows: a ΔAIH > 2.28 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 6.792, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.885-24.470, P = 0.003), CPD > 12.45 mm (OR = 5.876, 95% CI = 1.828-18.895, P = 0.003), and post-CSCA < 0° (OR = 6.251, 95% CI = 1.275-30.633, P = 0.024). Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the multilevel logistic regression model produced an area under the curve of 0.783 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with an FJD of >0.905 mm had worse NDI and VAS pain scores, but not a poorer modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score recovery rate. Our findings suggested that a ΔAIH > 2.28 mm, CPD > 12.45 mm, and post-CSCA < 0° were independent risk factors for excessive FJD after single-level ACDF for CSM.

Biplanar Videoradiography to Study the Wrist and Distal Radioulnar Joints

Accurate measurement of skeletal kinematics in vivo is essential for understanding normal joint function, the influence of pathology, disease progression, and the effects of treatments. Measurement systems that use skin surface markers to infer skeletal motion have provided important insight into normal and pathological kinematics, however, accurate arthrokinematics cannot be attained using these systems, especially during dynamic activities. In the past two decades, biplanar videoradiography (BVR) systems have enabled many researchers to directly study the skeletal kinematics of the joints during activities of daily living. To implement BVR systems for the distal upper extremity, videoradiographs of the distal radius and the hand are acquired from two calibrated X-ray sources while a subject performs a designated task. Three-dimensional (3D) rigid-body positions are computed from the videoradiographs via a best-fit registrations of 3D model projections onto to each BVR view. The 3D models are density-based image volumes of the specific bone derived from independently acquired computed-tomography data. Utilizing graphics processor units and high-performance computing systems, this model-based tracking approach is shown to be fast and accurate in evaluating the wrist and distal radioulnar joint biomechanics. In this study, we first summarized the previous studies that have established the submillimeter and subdegree agreement of BVR with an in vitro optical motion capture system in evaluating the wrist and distal radioulnar joint kinematics. Furthermore, we used BVR to compute the center of rotation behavior of the wrist joint, to evaluate the articulation pattern of the components of the implant upon one another, and to assess the dynamic change of ulnar variance during pronosupination of the forearm. In the future, carpal bones may be captured in greater detail with the addition of flat panel X-ray detectors, more X-ray sources (i.e., multiplanar videoradiography), or advanced computer vision algorithms.

Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Neck pain is one of the most commonly reported symptoms in primary care settings, and a major contributor to health-care costs. Cervical manipulation is a common and clinically effective intervention for neck pain. However, the in vivo biomechanics of manipulation are unknown due to previous challenges with accurately measuring intervertebral kinematics in vivo during the manipulation.

PURPOSE

The objectives were to characterize manual forces and facet joint gapping during cervical spine manipulation and to assess changes in clinical and functional outcomes after manipulation. It was hypothesized that patient-reported pain would decrease and intervertebral range of motion (ROM) would increase after manipulation.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Laboratory-based prospective observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

12 patients with acute mechanical neck pain (4 men and 8 women; average age 40 ± 15 years).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Amount and rate of cervical facet joint gapping during manipulation, amount and rate of force applied during manipulation, change in active intervertebral ROM from before to after manipulation, and numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) to measure change in pain after manipulation.

METHODS

Initially, all participants completed a NPRS (0-10). Participants then performed full ROM flexion-extension, rotation, and lateral bending while seated within a custom biplane radiography system. Synchronized biplane radiographs were collected at 30 images/s for 3 seconds during each movement trial. Next, synchronized, 2.0-milliseconds duration pulsed biplane radiographs were collected at 160 images/s for 0.8 seconds during the manipulation. The manipulation was performed by a licensed chiropractor using an articular pillar push technique. For the final five participants, two pressure sensors placed on the thumb of the chiropractor (Novel pliance system) recorded pressure at 160 Hz. After manipulation, all participants repeated the full ROM movement testing and once again completed the NPRS. A validated volumetric model-based tracking process that matched subject-specific bone models (from computed tomography) to the biplane radiographs was used to track bone motion with submillimeter accuracy. Facet joint gapping was calculated as the average distance between adjacent articular facet surfaces. Pre- to postmanipulation changes were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The facet gap increased 0.9 ± 0.40 mm during manipulation. The average rate of facet gapping was 6.2 ± 3.9 mm/s. The peak force and rate of force application during manipulation were 65 ± 4 N and 440 ± 58 N/s. Pain score improved from 3.7 ± 1.2 before manipulation to 2.0 ± 1.4 after manipulation (p <. 001). Intervertebral ROM increased after manipulation by 1.2° (p = .006), 2.1° (p = .01), and 3.9° (p = .003) at the C4/C5, C5/C6, and C6/C7 motion segments, respectively, during flexion-extension; by 1.5° (p = .028), 1.9° (p = .005), and 1.3° (p = .050) at the C3/C4, C4/C5, and C5/C6 motion segments, respectively, during rotation; and by 1.3° (p = .034) and 1.1° (p = .050) at the C4/C5 and C5/C6 motion segments, respectively, during lateral bending. Global head ROM relative to the torso increased after manipulation by 8º (p = .023), 10º (p = .002), and 13º (p = .019) during lateral bending, axial rotation and flexion-extension, respectively, after manipulation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to measure facet gapping during cervical manipulation on live humans. The results demonstrate that target and adjacent motion segments undergo facet joint gapping during manipulation and that intervertebral ROM is increased in all three planes of motion after manipulation. The results suggest that clinical and functional improvement after manipulation may occur as a result of small increases in intervertebral ROM across multiple motion segments. This study demonstrates the feasibility of characterizing in real time the manual inputs and biological responses that comprise cervical manipulation, including clinician-applied force, facet gapping, and increased intervertebral ROM. This provides a basis for future clinical trials to identify the mechanisms behind manipulation and to optimize the mechanical factors that reliably and sufficiently impact the key mechanisms behind manipulation.

The Interface of Mechanics and Nociception in Joint Pathophysiology: Insights From the Facet and Temporomandibular Joints

Chronic joint pain is a widespread problem that frequently occurs with aging and trauma. Pain occurs most often in synovial joints, the body's load bearing joints. The mechanical and molecular mechanisms contributing to synovial joint pain are reviewed using two examples, the cervical spinal facet joints and the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Although much work has focused on the macroscale mechanics of joints in health and disease, the combined influence of tissue mechanics, molecular processes, and nociception in joint pain has only recently become a focus. Trauma and repeated loading can induce structural and biochemical changes in joints, altering their microenvironment and modifying the biomechanics of their constitutive tissues, which themselves are innervated. Peripheral pain sensors can become activated in response to changes in the joint microenvironment and relay pain signals to the spinal cord and brain where pain is processed and perceived. In some cases, pain circuitry is permanently changed, which may be a potential mechanism for sustained joint pain. However, it is most likely that alterations in both the joint microenvironment and the central nervous system (CNS) contribute to chronic pain. As such, the challenge of treating joint pain and degeneration is temporally and spatially complicated. This review summarizes anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of these joints and the sensory pain relays. Pain pathways are postulated to be sensitized by many factors, including degeneration and biochemical priming, with effects on thresholds for mechanical injury and/or dysfunction. Initiators of joint pain are discussed in the context of clinical challenges including the diagnosis and treatment of pain.

The Physiological Basis of Cervical Facet-Mediated Persistent Pain: Basic Science and Clinical Challenges

Synopsis Chronic neck pain is a common condition and a primary clinical symptom of whiplash and other spinal injuries. Loading-induced neck injuries produce abnormal kinematics between the vertebrae, with the potential to injure facet joints and the afferent fibers that innervate the specific joint tissues, including the capsular ligament. Mechanoreceptive and nociceptive afferents that innervate the facet have their peripheral terminals in the capsule, cell bodies in the dorsal root ganglia, and terminal processes in the spinal cord. As such, biomechanical loading of these afferents can initiate nociceptive signaling in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Their activation depends on the local mechanical environment of the joint and encodes the neural processes that initiate pain and lead to its persistence. This commentary reviews the complex anatomical, biomechanical, and physiological consequences of facet-mediated whiplash injury and pain. The clinical presentation of facet-mediated pain is complex in its sensory and emotional components. Yet, human studies are limited in their ability to elucidate the physiological mechanisms by which abnormal facet loading leads to pain. Over the past decade, however, in vivo models of cervical facet injury that reproduce clinical pain symptoms have been developed and used to define the complicated and multifaceted electrophysiological, inflammatory, and nociceptive signaling cascades that are involved in the pathophysiology of whiplash facet pain. Integrating the whiplash-like mechanics in vivo and in vitro allows transmission of pathophysiological mechanisms across scales, with the hope of informing clinical management. Yet, despite these advances, many challenges remain. This commentary further describes and highlights such challenges. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(7):450-461. Epub 16 Jun 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7255.

Upper Cervical Spine Loading Simulating a Dynamic Low-Speed Collision Significantly Increases the Risk of Pain Compared to Quasi-Static Loading With Equivalent Neck Kinematics

Dynamic cervical spine loading can produce facet capsule injury. Despite a large proportion of neck pain being attributable to the C2/C3 facet capsule, potential mechanisms are not understood. This study replicated low-speed frontal and rear-end traffic collisions in occiput-C3 human cadaveric cervical spine specimens and used kinematic and full-field strain analyses to assess injury. Specimens were loaded quasi-statically in flexion and extension before and after dynamic rotation of C3 at 100 deg/s. Global kinematics in the sagittal plane were tracked at 1 kHz, and C2/C3 facet capsule full-field strains were measured. Dynamic loading did not alter the kinematics from those during quasi-static (QS) loading, but maximum principal strain (MPS) and shear strain (SS) were significantly higher (p = 0.028) in dynamic flexion than for the same quasi-static conditions. The full-field strain analysis demonstrated that capsule strain was inhomogeneous, and that the peak MPS generally occurred in the anterior aspect and along the line of the C2/C3 facet joint. The strain magnitude in dynamic flexion continued to rise after the rotation of C3 had stopped, with a peak MPS of 12.52 ± 4.59% and a maximum SS of 5.34 ± 1.60%. The peak MPS in loading representative of rear-end collisions approached magnitudes previously shown to induce pain in vivo, whereas strain analysis using linear approaches across the facet joint was lower and may underestimate injury risk compared to full-field analysis. The time at which peak MPS occurred suggests that the deceleration following a collision is critical in relation to the production of injurious strains within the facet capsule.

Narrative review of the in vivo mechanics of the cervical spine after anterior arthrodesis as revealed by dynamic biplane radiography

Arthrodesis is the standard of care for numerous pathologic conditions of the cervical spine and is performed over 150,000 times annually in the United States. The primary long-term concern after this surgery is adjacent segment disease (ASD), defined as new clinical symptoms adjacent to a previous fusion. The incidence of adjacent segment disease is approximately 3% per year, meaning that within 10 years of the initial surgery, approximately 25% of cervical arthrodesis patients require a second procedure to address symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration. Despite the high incidence of ASD, until recently, there was little data available to characterize in vivo adjacent segment mechanics during dynamic motion. This manuscript reviews recent advances in our knowledge of adjacent segment mechanics after cervical arthrodesis that have been facilitated by the use of dynamic biplane radiography. The primary observations from these studies are that current in vitro test paradigms often fail to replicate in vivo spine mechanics before and after arthrodesis, that intervertebral mechanics vary among cervical motion segments, and that joint arthrokinematics (i.e., the interactions between adjacent vertebrae) are superior to traditional kinematics measurements for identifying altered adjacent segment mechanics after arthrodesis. Future research challenges are identified, including improving the biofidelity of in vitro tests, determining the natural history of in vivo spine mechanics, conducting prospective longitudinal studies on adjacent segment kinematics and arthrokinematics after single and multiple-level arthrodesis, and creating subject-specific computational models to accurately estimate muscle forces and tissue loading in the spine during dynamic activities.