Association of postoperative shoulder balance with adding-on in Lenke Type II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Relationship between the course of postoperative pelvic axis rotation and shoulder balance in patients with Lenke types 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background

Posteroanterior radiographs of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) show bilateral differences in the iliac wings. This is due to pelvic axis rotation (PAR) associated with scoliosis. We often encounter cases wherein the PAR changes with surgery and postoperatively. We investigated the course of preoperative PAR and the relationship between PAR and shoulder balance in patients with Lenke 1,2 AIS.

Methods

In total, 28 patients with Lenke 1,2 AIS undergoing scoliosis correction were included. The PAR and shoulder parameters were measured on posteroanterior radiographs. The correlation between the measured parameters and the extent of changes in each parameter was also examined.

Results

Eleven patients (39.3 %) underwent preoperative PAR. Six patients (21.4 %) showed a greater change in PAR from 1 week to 2 years postoperatively. The rotation did not change significantly from preoperatively to immediately postoperatively but changed during the first three months postoperatively. The rotation group had significantly more balanced shoulders at 2 years (P = 0.025). The rotation group had a greater change in shoulder balance in the postoperative course significantly (P < 0.05). The extent of change in pelvic rotation from 1 week to 2 years postoperatively correlated with the extent of change in shoulder balance.

Conclusion

The PAR in patients with Lenke 1,2 AIS significantly changed during 3 months postoperatively. Patients with Lenke 1,2 AIS with preoperative PAR can be expected to have postoperative shoulder rebalancing.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Patients With Lenke Type 1 and 2 Scoliosis Treated Using the Vertebral Coplanar Alignment Technique

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the incidence of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) and its risk factors in patients with Lenke types 1 and 2 scoliosis corrected using vertebral coplanar alignment (VCA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PSI in scoliosis affects patient quality of life. While other correction methods have reported a high correction rate for the main thoracic curve (MTC) in relation to PSI, this correlation has not been confirmed for the VCA technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 176 patients with Lenke types 1 and 2 scoliosis who underwent posterior corrective fusion surgery using the VCA technique at 11 institutions. At 2 years postoperatively, patients were divided into two groups based on radiographic shoulder height (RSH): PSI- (RSH<2 cm) and PSI+ (RSH ≥2 cm) groups. We analyzed the risk factors for PSI.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PSI 2 years postoperatively was 11.4% (20/176), with 9.2% (11/119) and 15.8% (9/57) in patients with Lenke types 1 and 2, respectively. Contrary to a previous study, a high MTC correction rate did not emerge as a risk factor for PSI. Instead, preoperative left shoulder elevation, low postoperative thoracic kyphosis, greater T1 tilt, and high apical vertebral body-to-rib ratio were associated with PSI in patients with Lenke type 1. Preoperative left shoulder elevation and a low postoperative proximal thoracic curve (PTC) correction rate were identified as risk factors for PSI in patients with Lenke type 2.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that proper PTC correction, rather than compromising MTC correction, may help prevent PSI in the VCA technique. This method is particularly advantageous for addressing Lenke type 1 scoliosis and yields favorable outcomes in shoulder balance. Patients with preoperative left shoulder elevation, especially Lenke type 2, are at high risk of developing PSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Incidence of and Factors Associated with Spontaneous Correction of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

As far as we know, no study has investigated spontaneous postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. The objective is to assess the incidence of and associated factors for spontaneous PSI correction in AIS patients.

Methods

The study evaluated 144 postoperative AIS patients with PSI aged 10-20 years between 2010 and 2018. An analysis included demographic data and radiographic measurements (Risser grading, Lenke type, upper instrumented vertebra [UIV], and lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV]). Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiographs were evaluated for shoulder parameters: radiologic shoulder height (RSH); T1 tilt angle; clavicle angle (CA); proximal thoracic curve (PTC), main thoracic curve (MTC), and lumbar curve (LC) Cobb measurements; and apical vertebral translation (AVT) of the PTC, MTC, and LC.

Results

Spontaneous PSI correction was observed in 99 (68.75%) patients. The spontaneous correction and nonspontaneous correction groups differed significantly in terms of Lenke-type preoperative LC (23° vs 26°; P = 0.091), postoperative LC (11° vs 8°; P = 0.013), LC at follow-up (13.5° vs 9°; P = 0.028), postoperative AVT of LC (- 0.8° vs - 0.4°; P = 0.033), AVT of LC at follow-up (- 0.7° vs - 0.1°; P = 0.091), PTC at follow-up (16° vs 20°; P = 0.019), and AVT of PTC at follow-up (0° vs -0.3°; P = 0.029). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative T1 tilt and postoperative LC as significantly associated with PSI correction.

Conclusions

The incidence of spontaneous PSI correction is high. Postoperative T1 tilt and postoperative LC are significantly associated with spontaneous PSI correction.

Curve progression following selective and nonselective spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: are selective fusions stable?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes between selective and non-selective fusions longitudinally over the first five postoperative years.

METHODS

Patient parameters were retrieved from a multicenter, prospective, database. Patients with Lenke 1-6, B and C deformities were included. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: selective fusion (SF), if the last instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at or cranial to the lumbar apex, or non-selective fusion (NSF). Differences in coronal and sagittal radiographic outcomes were assessed with generalized linear models (GLMs) at 1-, 2- and 5- year postoperative outcomes. Five-year postoperative categorical radiographic outcomes, flexibility, scoliosis research society scores (SRS), and reoperation rates were compared between groups. Matched cohorts were created for subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

416 (SF:261, NF:155) patients, including 353 females were included in this study. The mean preoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles were 57.3 ± 8.9 and 45.3 ± 8.0, respectively. GLMs demonstrated greater postoperative coronal deformity in the SF group (p < 0.01); however, the difference between groups did not change overtime (p > 0.05) indicating a relatively stable postoperative deformity correction. The SF group had a greater incidence of lumbar Cobb ≥ 26 degrees (p < 0.01). The NSF group demonstrated worse forward and lateral flexibility at 5-year postoperative outcome (p < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative SRS scores between the SF and NSF groups. Reoperation rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Selective fusion results in greater coronal plane deformity; however, this deformity does not progress significantly over time compared to non-selective fusion. Selective spinal fusion may be a beneficial option for a larger subset of patients than previously identified.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Analyzing Factors Associated with Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Lenke2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (Retrospective Cohort Study)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the incidence of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) following posterior spinal fusion surgeries in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with Lenke2 and calculate the risk factors for PSI.

METHODS

Sixty patients who underwent surgery for Lenke2 AIS with more than 2-year follow-up were selected. Radiographic parameters were measured before and after surgery, and at the latest follow-up. The patients were divided into PSI and non-PSI groups, with PSI defined as a radiographic shoulder height >15 mm on postoperative radiography. The factors were compared between the PSI and non-PSI groups using the Mann-Whitney U test or chi-squared test. Finally, explanatory variables were chosen for multivariate analysis based on previous studies.

RESULTS

The PSI group comprised 17 patients. Most PSI cases spontaneously improved, and four patients (6.7%) showed PSI at the final follow-up. Univariate analysis indicated significant differences between postoperative T1 tilt (9.00 ± 5.17 vs. 5.67 ± 4.02, P = 0.029), UIV tilt (1.94 ± 4.49 vs. -1.00 ± 5.04, P = 0.039), and ΔT1 tilt (4.82 ± 3.99 vs. 2.12 ± 3.77, P = 0.026). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that ΔT1 tilt had a significant positive relationship with PSI occurrence (coefficient = 0.2541, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.023 to 0.485, P = 0.0310). This study found no significant differences in the SRS-22 scores at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PSI for Lenke2 AIS was 28.3% at 1 week postoperatively and 6.7% at the final follow-up. ΔT1 tilt was a risk factor for PSI. Adjustment of the T1 tilt during surgery was considered useful for the prevention of PSI.

Does Sacral Slanting Affect Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Patients With Lenke Type 2A Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

OBJECTIVE

Even minor sacral slanting can influence T1 tilt and shoulder balance. Yet, the relationship between sacral slanting and postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) has not been previously explored. To determine risk factors for PSI in Lenke 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, with an emphasis on sacral slanting.

METHODS

The study encompassed 96 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior correction and fusion surgery for Lenke type 2A AIS. Patients were grouped into PSI(+) and PSI(-) based on postoperative outcomes. Additionally, they were classified into left-sided slanting, no slanting, and right-sided slanting groups according to the degree of sacral slanting. Various radiological measures were compared.

RESULTS

Patients in the PSI(+) group exhibited a smaller preoperative proximal thoracic curve and a higher main thoracic curve correction rate than those in the PSI(-) group. The presence or absence of sacral slanting did not exhibit a significant variation in PSI occurrence. However, the right-sided sacral slanting group showed a larger delta radiologic shoulder height compared to the other 2 groups (7.1 mm vs. 1.5 & 3.3 mm).

CONCLUSION

Sacral slanting was not directly linked to the development of PSI. Despite the common postoperative elevation of the left shoulder, the shoulder height differences decreased over the follow-up period. Especially in cases with a right-sided tilted sacrum, the PSI demonstrated progressive improvement, with an associated increase in the rightward distal wedging angle, leading to distal adding-on.

Relationship between Fusion Mass Shift and Postoperative Distal Adding-on in Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis after Selective Thoracic Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the risk factors for postoperative distal adding-on in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and validate the relationship between fusion mass shift (FMS) and postoperative distal adding-on.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Postoperative distal curve adding-on is one of the complications in AIS. FMS has been proposed to prevent postoperative distal adding-on, which requires further validation from different institutions.

METHODS

This study included 60 patients with Lenke 1 AIS who underwent selective thoracic fusion surgery. Coronal spinal alignment parameters were analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the final follow-up. The postoperative FMS was divided into two groups: the balanced group (FMS ≤20 mm) and the unbalanced group (FMS >20 mm). An independent t-test was used to compare quantitative data between groups, and a chi-square test was used for qualitative data. Furthermore, binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were used to identify the risk factors for postoperative distal adding-on in AIS.

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up, the unbalanced group was more likely to have adding-on (17 of 24 patients) than the balanced group (six of 36 patients; p<0.001). Twenty-three patients with distal adding-on had significantly greater preoperative and postoperative lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) rotation, FMS, and FMS angle (FMSA) than those without postoperative distal adding-on. Binary logistic regression analysis selected three independent risk factors for adding-on incidence after surgery: FMS (odds ratio [OR], 1.115; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.049-1.185; p<0.001), FMSA (OR, 1.590; 95% CI, 1.225-2.064; p<0.001), and postoperative LIV rotation (OR, 6.581; 95% CI, 2.280-19.000; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving a balanced fusion mass intraoperatively is important to avoid postoperative distal adding-on, with FMS of <20 mm and FMS angle of <4.5°. Furthermore, correcting LIV rotation helps to decrease the incidence of postoperative distal addingon.

Optimal lowest instrumented vertebra selection with consideration of coronal and sagittal planes to prevent distal junctional complications in patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Postoperative distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis are major distal junctional complications after selective thoracic fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis and evaluate the validity of our selection criteria for the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A AIS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A AIS, who underwent posterior fusion surgery. LIV selection included the followings: (1) stable vertebra on traction film, (2) disc space neutralization below the LIV on the side-bending film, and (3) lordotic disc below the LIV on the lateral film. Radiographic parameters and the revised 22-item Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22r) were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis was also investigated.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (83 women and 7 men; 64 with type 1A and 26 with type 2A) were included. After the operation, each curve and the SRS-22r of self-image, mental health, and subtotal domains were significantly improved. Distal adding-on occurred in three patients (3.3%, one in type 1A and two in type 2A) at 2 years postoperatively. No patients exhibited distal junctional kyphosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our LIV selection criteria could reduce the incidence of postoperative distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis in patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A AIS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Upper End Vertebra of Proximal Thoracic Curve At T1 is a Novel Risk Factor of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Lenke Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single-center study.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) in patients with Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) including the position of preoperative upper end vertebra (UEV).

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with Lenke type 2 AIS who underwent posterior correction and fusion surgeries from 2008 to 2018 were included. We included only patients whose upper instrumented vertebrae were at T2. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on radiographic shoulder height (RSH) at final follow-up, namely PSI group and non-PSI group, and PSI was defined as RSH > 10 mm. UEV, RSH, Cobb angle, curve flexibility, T1 and T2 tilt, correction rate, Risser grade, Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores, and demographic data were compared between the groups using independent t-tests or chi-square tests. Variables with P value < 0.20 in univariate analysis were assessed in logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients in the PSI group and 37 patients in the non-PSI group were analyzed. Univariate analysis revealed that there were more patients with UEV at T1 (PSI: 85%, non-PSI: 54%, P < 0.01) and Risser grade ≥ 3 (PSI: 88%, non-PSI: 62%; P < 0.05) in the PSI group than in the non-PSI group. Logistic regression analysis revealed that UEV at T1 (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1 [1.2-14.4], P < 0.05) and Risser grade ≥ 3 (OR = 3.9 [1.1-14.5], P < 0.05) are significantly associated with PSI.

CONCLUSIONS

UEV at T1 and Risser grade ≥ 3 at the time of surgery are significant risk factors of PSI.

Preoperative "Cervical Axis" Deviation Increases the Risk of Distal Adding-On Following Surgery in Lenke 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between shoulder/ neck imbalance with distal adding-on phenomenon and to identify other risk factors in Lenke 1 and 2 (non-AR curves) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

METHODS

100 Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients with lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) cephalad to or at L1 were recruited. Medial shoulder/ neck balance was represented by T1-tilt and cervical axis (CA). Lateral shoulder balance was represented by clavicle angle (Cla-A) and radiographic shoulder height (RSH). Distal adding-on phenomenon was diagnosed when there was disc wedging below LIV of >5^o at final follow-up. Predictive factors and odds ratio were derived using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean age of this cohort was 15.9 ± 4.4 years. Mean follow-up duration was 30.9 ± 9.6 months. Distal adding-on phenomenon occurred in 19 patients (19.0%). Only Risser grade, preoperative CA and final follow-up lumbar Cobb angle were the independent factors. A positive preoperative CA deviation increased the odds of distal adding-on by 5.4 times (95% CI 1.34-21.51, P = 0.018). The mean immediate postoperative T1-tilt, CA, RSH and Cla-A were comparable between the group with distal adding-on and the group without.

CONCLUSION

Distal adding-on phenomenon occurred in 19.0% of patients. Preoperative "Cervical Axis" was an important factor and it increased the risk of distal adding-on by 5.4 times. Other significant predictive factors were Risser grade and lumbar Cobb angle at final follow-up. Immediate postoperative shoulder or neck imbalance was not a significant factor for postoperative distal adding-on phenomenon.

A Novel Method for Predicting Ideal Postoperative Upper Instrumented Vertebra Tilt to Prevent Lateral Shoulder Imbalance after Scoliosis Correction Surgery

Lateral shoulder imbalance (LSI) is reflected radiologically by the clavicle angle (CA). How to achieve postoperative lateral shoulder balance (LSB) after scoliosis correction surgery remains unclear. In the current study, by using the preoperative upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt, the CA, the flexibility between T1 and the UIV, and the ideal postoperative UIV tilt was predicted based on the following formula: ideal postoperative UIV tilt = preoperative UIV tilt—the flexibility between T1 and UIV—preoperative CA. The reliability of the formula was verified through a retrospective analysis, and 76 scoliosis patients were enrolled. The feasibility of this method was verified through a prospective analysis, and 13 scoliosis patients were enrolled. In the retrospective study, there was a significant correlation between the difference in the actual and ideal postoperative UIV tilt values and the postoperative CA, with correlation coefficients in the whole, LSI, and LSB groups of 0.981, 0.982, and 0.953, respectively (p < 0.001). In the prospective study, all patients achieved satisfactory LSB. Using the formula preoperatively to predict an ideal postoperative UIV tilt and controlling the intraoperative UIV tilt with the improved crossbar technique may be an effective digital method for achieving postoperative LSB and has important clinical significance.

Preoperative Less Right Shoulder Elevation Had a Higher Risk of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance When Main Thoracic Curve Shows Higher Correction Regardless of the Upper Instrumented Vertebra Level for Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Type 1

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) in patients with Lenke type 1.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

PSI is a complication resulting in poor self-image and satisfaction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

METHODS

We examined the data of AIS patients with Lenke type 1 curves who underwent posterior fusion surgery in a retrospective manner. PSI was defined as a 2-year postoperative absolute radiographic shoulder height (RSH) of ≥2 cm. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of PSI and the level of their upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (UIV at T2 or T3 [U-UIV] or UIV below T3 [L-UIV]). The radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared, and the cutoff values of risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients, 21 (20.2%) had left shoulder elevation PSI. The PSI group had a significantly greater preoperative RSH (-5.1 mm vs. -14.3 mm) and main thoracic (MT) curve correction rate (77.3% vs. 69.1%) than the non-PSI group. The PSI incidence did not differ between the U-UIV and L-UIV groups. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative RSH and the MT curve correction rate as independent risk factors for PSI. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the preoperative RSH cutoff value as -6.5 mm and MT curve correction rate cutoff value as 76.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in AIS patients with Lenke type 1 curves, the incidence of PSI was relatively high (20.2%). Patients with preoperative lower right shoulder elevation (i.e., RSH >-6.5 mm) had a higher risk of PSI regardless of UIV level when the MT curve showed a higher correction rate (i.e., correction rate >76.9%).

Nomogram for predicting the distal adding-on phenomenon in severe and rigid scoliosis

Background

The distal adding-on phenomenon has attracted extensive discussion in the field of spine surgery due to the continual occurrence after scoliosis correction. Previous work has mainly focused on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and a relatively high number of theories for the mechanism of the distal adding-on phenomenon has been proposed for these kinds of patients. Severe and rigid scoliosis, as a special disease form, has a unique etiology, clinical manifestations and internal mechanisms distinct from those of AIS. Given the uniqueness of this disease, the mechanism and causes of the distal adding-on phenomenon have been infrequently studied in depth.

Objective

To define clinical and radiological factors associated with distal adding-on in patients with severe and rigid scoliosis.

Methods

Radiographic parameters and demographic data of patients with severe and rigid scoliosis were evaluated preoperatively, after posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery, and at the final follow-up via radiographs. According to the appearance of distal adding-on at the final follow-up, the patients were grouped into the Adding-on and the Non-adding-on groups. Various radiological parameters were analyzed in stepwise multivariate logistic regression to identify the variables associated with distal adding-on, which were then incorporated into a nomogram. The predictive performance and calibration of the nomograms for distal adding-on were assessed using C statistics and calibration plots.

Results

93 patients (21 in the Adding-on and 72 in the Non-adding-on group) were included. The incidence of distal adding-on was 22.6%. The variables associated with distal adding-on were the anterior release, posterior internal distraction, and later posterior spinal fusion (IP) procedure, the posterior vertebral column resection and posterior spinal fusion (PVCR) procedure, postoperative apical vertebral translation (Post-AVT) and preoperative slope of the line linking the pedicles on the concave side of the upper- and lower-end vertebrae (Tan α). Combining these factors, the nomogram achieved a concordance index of 0.92 in predicting distal adding-on and had well-fitted calibration curves.

Conclusions

For patient with a negative Tanα in severe and rigid scoliosis, the risk of distal adding-on tended to increase, and it is recommended to give priority to IP or PVCR. In the final correction, a smaller Post-AVT should not be pursued excessively.

Usefulness of modified S-line for upper instrumented vertebra selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 2 curves

No validated systems exist for selecting the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) for optimal postoperative shoulder balance in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study evaluated a new method for shoulder balance prediction using the modified Shinshu line (MSL) for UIV selection in AIS Lenke type 2 curves. Fifty-five consecutive AIS patients receiving posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for a Lenke type 2 AIS curve were retrospectively analyzed according to several UIV determination models. Shoulder imbalance was judged as absolute radiographic shoulder height ≥ 10 mm at the 2-year observational endpoint. The MSL was the line between the center of the spinous process of C7 and that of the lowest instrumented vertebra. The vertebral body first touched proximally by the MSL was defined as the MSL vertebra (MSLV) and recommended as the UIV. The group with the UIV matching the MSLV had a significantly lower prevalence of shoulder imbalance of 23% (odds ratio 4.08, 95% CI 1.22-13.7, P = 0.02). Setting the MSLV as the UIV in PSF for AIS Lenke type 2 may reduce the prevalence of postoperative shoulder imbalance.

How can postoperative shoulder imbalance be prevented in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis type 2?

Postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) is a common complication following adolescent idiopathic scolio- sis (AIS) surgery. There is little data available in literature on prediction of PSI. Prospectively collected data of AIS with thoracic curve (Lenke 2), operated in 2014-2018 at a single scoliosis-center, were analyzed retrospectively using X-rays of whole spine and traction films (TA): age, Cobb-angle of proximal (PC), major thoracic (MC) and lumbar curve (LC), shoulder height [mm], clavicle angle [°], T1-tilt [°], plumb line [mm]. Results as mean ± standard deviation. Change over time (postOP- FU) compared using t-test (≥=0.05). Correlation of preOP parameters and curve correction with PSI (|≥|15mm) was analyzed by correlation (Pearson)- and regression-classification-analysis. 32 AIS, average age of 14±1.3 yrs. FU 16 months (84%). Curve correction was 52.5% (PC), 70.1% (MC), 69.9% (LC), significant change in FU for PC (-2.4°, p>0.05), not for MC, LC (p=0.2, p=0.6). Shoulder height was negative if right- side up: 2.9±15.1mm (preOP), 5.5±15.0 mm (TA), 17.9±14.9mm (postOP), 17.4±8.4mm (FU). 28% had preOP shoulder imbalance, 69% postOP and 44% FU had PSI. Shoulder height on TA correlated to change preOP to FU (r=0.62) and preOP shoulder height (r=-0.85), clavicle angle had strong correlation (r=- 0.81). Regression-classification-analysis: correction of MC>62.4%, 81.5% of cases had PSI; with correction of MC>64.9% and LC>93.2%, 51.9% of cases had PSI. PSI is a common in Lenke2 AIS. In preOP planning TA, shoulder position and clavicle angle should be considered to prevent PSI. Correction of MC should be moderate, overcorrection of the LC avoided.

Proximal junctional fractures after long-segment instrumented fusion: comparisons between upper instrumented vertebrae and upper instrumented vertebrae + 1

Introduction

Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is a well-known complication after long-segment (at least 4 vertebral levels) instrumented fusion. The etiologies of PJF include degenerative processes or are fracture induced. The fracture type of PJF includes vertebral fractures developed at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) or UIV + 1. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiographic features of these two subtypes of PJF and to analyze risk factors in these patients.

Method

In total, forty-two patients with PJF who underwent revision surgery were included. Twenty patients suffered fractures at the UIV, and the other 22 cases had fractures at UIV + 1. The weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and bone mineral density (BMD) T scores for these patients were recorded. Surgery-related data of index surgery and complications were collected. Radiographic parameters including pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI-LL were recorded in both groups before and after the revision surgery.

Result

Both groups had severe osteoporosis and comorbidities. The interval between the index surgery and revision surgery was shorter in the UIV group than in the UIV + 1 group (8.2 months vs. 35.9 months; p < 0.001). The analysis for radiographic parameters in UIV and UIV + 1 group demonstrated no significant change before and after the revision surgery. However, the preoperative radiographic analysis showed a larger PT (31.5° vs. 23.2°, p = 0.013), PI (53.7° vs. 45.3°, p = 0.035), and SVA (78.6° vs. 59.4°, p = 0.024) in the UIV group compared to the UIV + 1 group. The postoperative radiographic analysis showed a larger PI-LL (27.8° vs. 18.1°, p = 0.016) in the UIV group compared to the UIV + 1 group.

Conclusion

PJF in the UIV group tends to occur earlier than in the UIV + 1 group. Moreover, more severe global sagittal imbalances were found in the UIV group than in UIV + 1 group.

Distal adding-on in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in diminished health-related quality of life at 10 years following posterior spinal fusion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between the various definitions of adding-on identified in the literature and HRQoL at 10 years following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to identify a clinically relevant definition.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with Lenke type 1 or 2 AIS with 10-year follow-up after PSF were identified in a multicenter registry. Adding-on was identified independently using 5 published definitions and expert spine surgeons' visual confirmation. Worsening of HRQoL was defined as a preoperative to 10-year postoperative decrease in SRS-22 domain score ≥ the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty patients were included, and 118 had HRQoL data available for the main analysis. Worsening pain was noted in 49 (41.5%) patients, appearance in 1 (0.8%), and activity in 70 (59.3%) from preoperative to postoperative. 4 of the 5 definitions of adding-on demonstrated no evidence of association with worsening HRQoL. By Cho's definition (either 1. ≥ 5° increase in Cobb angle AND increase in number of vertebrae in curve distally, or 2. ≥ 5° increase in angulation of 1st disc below LIV), adding-on (27 patients, 22.9%) was associated with an increased risk of worsening pain (59.3% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.033) and activity (77.8% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.026). There was no evidence of association with changes in appearance. Risk of worsening pain and activity was increased by 1.75 and 1.51 times (p = 0.023 and p = 0.002), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cho's definition of adding-on was associated with worsening HRQoL at 10 years following PSF for Lenke type 1 and 2 AIS. Consistent use of this definition will allow us to compare studies and obtain meaningful information in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Evaluating flexibility and predicting curve correction using fulcrum-bending radiographs in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Fulcrum-bending (FB) correction is considered to provide the best estimation of main thoracic (MT) curve flexibility and postoperative correction in surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, few studies evaluated the usefulness of FB radiographs for proximal thoracic (PT) curve. We aimed to perform flexibility assessments using both active side-bending (SB) and FB radiographs and evaluate surgical outcomes after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for Lenke type 2 AIS.

METHODS

This study included 38 consecutive patients with Lenke type 2 AIS who underwent PSF using a pedicle screw construct with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic parameters, including correction rate, SB and FB flexibility, and FB correction index (FBCI: [correction rate/FB flexibility] × 100), were evaluated preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up. The clinical outcomes were preoperatively evaluated using the Scoliosis Research Outcomes Instrument-22 and at the follow-up.

RESULTS

All scoliosis curves significantly improved and shoulder balance shifted toward left shoulder elevation (all comparisons, p < 0.0001). There were significant differences between the SB and FB corrections in the PT and MT curves (p < 0.0001). The magnitudes of the discrepancies between the SB and FB corrections in the PT and MT curves were 11.2° ± 5.2° and 11.6° ± 7.2°, respectively. FB correction did not differ from postoperative Cobb angles correction immediately after surgery or at the 2-year follow-up; the mean FBCIs in the PT and MT curves were 98.8% and 105.5%, respectively. The self-image domain SRS-22 scores had significantly increased at the 2-year follow-up (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences between the SB and FB corrections, and FB correction tended to approximate the postoperative curve correction (FBCI = 100%) for PT and MT curves in patients with Lenke type 2 AIS. FB flexibility is more reliable than SB flexibility in evaluating actual curve flexibility even for the PT curve.

Surgical Predictors for Prevention of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Lenke Type 2A Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence and surgical predictors of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) in Lenke type 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although several studies have investigated the factors influencing PSI in Lenke type 2 curves, no studies have analyzed PSI-related factors considering upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and lumbar modifier type simultaneously.

METHODS

Patients with Lenke Type 2A AIS treated by spinal fusion were retrospectively identified and their data were extracted from six spine centers in Japan. Inclusion criteria were age between 10 and 20 years at surgery, UIV = T2, major curve 40° to 90°, and follow-up for 24 to 30 months after surgery. We analyzed patient characteristics, surgical characteristics, and preoperative and immediate-postoperative radiographic parameters. We defined patients with lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) equal or proximal to the last touching vertebra (LTV) as selective thoracic fusion (STF-LTV) and patients with LIV distal to the LTV as non-STF-LTV. t Tests, Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 tests, Fisher exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Among the 99 consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 25.6 months, PSI was seen in 27 (27.3%) patients immediately after and in 17 (17.2%) patients at 24 to 30 months. The univariate analysis revealed that the significant risk factors of PSI were preoperative radiographical shoulder height, non-STF-LTV, and high main thoracic curve (MTC) correction (immediate-postoperative MTC correction rate: ≥70%), with PSI incidence of 40.0%. The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that interaction term of non-STF-LTV and high MTC correction was an independent risk factor for PSI (non-STF-LTV and high MTC correction, odds ratio: 5.167, 95% confidence interval: 1.470-18.159, P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

To prevent PSI in Lenke Type 2A AIS patients, surgeons should avoid the combination of non-STF-LTV and high MTC correction in those surgeries with UIV as T2.Level of Evidence: 4.

Risk Factors of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Role of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Selection

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine (1) the independent risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) correction surgery; and (2) whether the level of upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) affects postoperative shoulder balance.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PSI is an important outcome of AIS correction surgery as it influences a patient's appearance and satisfaction. However, risk factors for PSI remain controversial and there are currently no studies evaluating the effect of sagittal spinopelvic parameters on PSI. Previous studies on the relationship between the level of UIV and PSI have also reported conflicting results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine AIS patients undergoing correction surgery at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters were measured on anteroposterior and lateral x-rays preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively. At 1 year follow-up, patients were divided into 2 groups based on their radiographic shoulder height (RSH): (1) PSI group (RSH ≥20 mm) and (2) non-PSI group (RSH <20 mm).

RESULTS

On multivariate regression analysis, a lower postoperative main thoracic curve (MTC) [odds ratio (OR): 0.702, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.519-0.949, P=0.022], greater percentage correction of MTC (OR: 1.526, 95% CI: 1.049-2.220, P=0.027) and higher postoperative sacral slope (OR: 1.364, 95% CI: 1.014-1.834, P=0.040) were identified as independent risk factors of PSI. When preoperative, postoperative, and absolute change in shoulder parameters were compared across the level of UIV, no significant differences were found regardless of the radiographic shoulder parameter analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower postoperative MTC, greater percentage correction of MTC and higher postoperative sacral slope were independent risk factors of PSI. Shoulder balance and symmetry were not affected by the level of UIV selected. Relative curve correction is a more important consideration than UIV to avoid PSI after AIS correction surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Shoulder Balance Following Correction Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: When Is It Achieved and Does the Type of Construct Matter?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine (1) when shoulder rebalancing occurs after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) correction surgery and (2) whether shoulder asymmetry was influenced by the use of pedicle screws or hooks.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative shoulder imbalance is an important outcome of AIS correction surgery as it may influence a patient's appearance and satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy AIS patients undergoing AIS correction surgery at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters were measured from anteroposterior x-rays at preoperative, immediate postoperative, 6 months postsurgery, and 12 months postsurgery. Shoulder parameters measured were: radiographic shoulder height (RSH), clavicle angle, coracoid height difference (CHD), and T1 tilt. The Cobb angle of the proximal thoracic curve, major thoracic curve, and thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. The percentage of correction was also calculated.

RESULTS

Lateral shoulder asymmetry (RSH and CHD) changed significantly from preoperative to up to 6 months postsurgery. T1 tilt, a measure of medial shoulder asymmetry, did not change significantly. Postoperatively, the hook group attained significantly better shoulder balance than the screw group in terms of RSH and CHD up to 12 months postsurgery. However, the percentage correction of the major thoracic curve was significantly greater in the screw group than the hook group (hook: 62.2±18.4% vs. screw: 76.0±16.0%, P=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral shoulder rebalancing occurs up to 6 months after surgery. While thoracic pedicle screws offer greater correction of major AIS curves, hook constructs offer better postoperative shoulder symmetry.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Evaluation of shoulder balance in early onset scoliosis after definitive fusion and comparison with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis shoulder balance

STUDY DESIGN

The Children Spine Study Group registry was queried for early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients who had final definitive spinal fusion after their scoliosis was managed with either growing rods or VEPTR. The Harms Study Group registry was queried for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who had definitive fusion OBJECTIVE: The goal is to assess shoulder alignment in EOS patients after a definitive fusion and how these radiographic outcomes relate to the more familiar situation of post-definitive fusions shoulder alignment in AIS patients.

BACKGROUND

EOS is a challenging pathology to manage. Numerous components are important in the success of spinal surgery for this population. Shoulder balance is a one of the components that is easily seen by the patient. Recently, the importance of its relationship to patient satisfaction has received greater attention.

METHODS

Sample size: n = 145 (EOS (n = 34) and AIS (n = 111)). Shoulder balance parameters (SBP) of clavicular angle (CA), coracoid height difference (CHD), clavicular tilt angle difference (CTAD), and clavicle-rib cage intersection difference (CRID) measurements were measured from the reviewed radiographs and documented pre-definitive, post-definitive and 2-year follow-up measures. Shoulder balance parameters were compared between EOS and AIS cohorts at documented intervals.

RESULTS

EOS mean pre-definitive fusion SBPs (CA, CTAD, CRID, CHD) were significantly higher compared to AIS, p = 0.004, 0.003, < 0.001, < 0.001, respectively. Significant post-definitive fusion corrections were noticed for CTAD (0.01), CHD (0.01), nearly significant CA (0.07), non-significant CRID in EOS patients. In AIS patients, no significant corrections were noticed for CA, CTAD, CHD and but significant for CRID (0.02). At post-definitive and 2-year follow-up, CA, CRID, CHD were not significant between cohorts, but CTAD (< 0.01) was significantly higher in EOS cohort at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Post-definitive and 2-year follow-up shoulder balance for EOS patients was not significantly different from AIS patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Defining risk factors for adding-on in Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves

PURPOSE

To identify curve/correction characteristics associated with adding-on at 2 years after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in Lenke 1/2 AR curves.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter registry was queried to identify patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Lenke 1/2 AR curves, who underwent PSF with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patient characteristics as well as pre- and post- operative radiographic variables were evaluated using Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to determine which factors contribute to adding-on.

RESULTS

253 patients treated with PSF were assessed for adding-on, of which 50 met our adding-on criteria. Univariate analysis revealed adding-on was associated several factors including: post-operative thoracic and lumbar curve magnitude (p > 0.001), first erect (FE) end instrumented vertebra (EIV) angulation (p = 0.009) and EIV translation (p = 0.001), younger age (p = 0.027), Risser stage (p = 0.024), and a more proximal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) (p < 0.001). Multivariate CART analysis showed the chance of adding-on was more than 2 times greater (42 vs 16%) when the chosen LIV was translated more than 2.7 cm from the CSVL. When the LIV was within 2.7 cm, the post-op risk of adding-on was increased when the LIV was not perfectly leveled (> 0.5°).

CONCLUSION

In Lenke 1 and 2 AR curves, pre-operative LIV translation appears to be an independent risk factor for adding-on; and in those with < 2.7 cm of LIV translation, FE LIV angulation also seems to increase the risk of adding-on. These factors are relevant in determining appropriate LIV selection and aid in identifying patients at risk for developing adding-on.

Distal Adding-on Phenomenon in Scoliosis Secondary to Chiari Malformation Type I: Incidence and Risk Factors

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors for distal adding-on (AO) phenomenon after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in scoliosis secondary to Chiari malformation type I (CMS) patients with right major thoracic curve.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Distal AO phenomenon is a common complication observed in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), which is significantly associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. However, few studies specifically focused on the incidence and risk factors of distal AO in CMS.

METHODS

Seventy-eight CMS adolescents were included with a minimum of 2-year follow-up after PSF. patients with distal AO at the final follow-up were divided into AO group and those without were No-AO group. The coronal and sagittal parameters were evaluated preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the last follow-up. Clinical outcome was analyzed using the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS).

RESULTS

Distal AO was observed in 18 of 78 patients (23.1%). Compared with No-AO group, patients with distal AO had significantly lower Risser sign (P = 0.001), more flexibility of lumbar curve (P = 0.021), higher incidence of lowest instrumented vertebra-last substantially touched vertebra (LIV-LSTV) ≤0 (P = 0.001), smaller postoperative Cobb angle of lumbar curve (P < 0.001), and greater correction rate of lumbar curve (P = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that low Risser sign (Grade 1-2, odds ratio [OR] = 5.7, P = 0.029) and LIV-LSTV ≤0 (OR = 6.4, P = 0.019) were independent risk factors for distal AO. There was no significant difference of CCOS scores between two groups at the final follow-up (P > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of distal AO was 23.1% in CMS patients after PSF. Patients with low Risser sign and LIV-LSTV ≤0 were high risk factors for distal AO.Level of Evidence: 3.

Evaluation of changes in shoulder balance and prediction of final shoulder imbalance during growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis

Background

Obtaining and maintaining final shoulder balance after the entire treatment course is essential for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients. The relatively small number of growing-rod (GR) graduates who complete final fusion has resulted in an overall paucity of research on the GR treatment of EOS and a lack of research on the shoulder balance of EOS patients during GR treatment.

Methods

Twenty-four consecutive patients who underwent GR treatment until final fusion were included. Radiographic shoulder balance parameters, including the radiographic shoulder height (RSH), clavicle angle (CA), and T1 tilt angle (T1T), before and after each step of the entire treatment were measured. Shoulder balance changes from GR implantation to the last follow-up after final fusion were depicted and analysed. Demographic data, surgical-related factors, and radiographic parameters were analysed to identify risk factors for final shoulder imbalance. The shoulder balance of patients at different time points was further analysed to explore the potential effect of the series of GR treatment steps on shoulder balance.

Results

The RSH showed substantial improvement after GR implantation (P = 0.036), during the follow-up period after final fusion (P = 0.021) and throughout the entire treatment (P = 0.011). The trend of change in the CA was similar to that of the RSH, and the T1T improved immediately after GR implantation (P = 0.037). Further analysis indicated that patients with shoulder imbalance before final fusion showed significantly improved shoulder balance after fusion (P = 0.045), and their RSH values at early postfusion and the final follow-up did not show statistically significant differences from those in the prefusion shoulder balance group (P > 0.05). Early postfusion shoulder imbalance (odds ratio (OR): 19.500; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.777–213.949; P = 0.015) was identified as an independent risk factor for final shoulder imbalance.

Conclusions

Shoulder balance could be improved by GR implantation but often changes during the multistep lengthening process, and the final result is relatively unpredictable. Final fusion could further adjust the prefusion shoulder imbalance. Focusing on the prefusion shoulder balance of GR graduates and providing patients with early shoulder balance after fusion might be necessary.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04221-9.

Sinister! The high pre-op left shoulder is less likely to be radiographically balanced at 2 years post-op

PURPOSE

AIS patients consider shoulder balance an important cosmetic outcome after surgery. We examined the impact of preoperative left shoulder elevation (LSE) and choice of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on postoperative shoulder imbalance (PostSI).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing a prospective AIS database. Patients had Lenke type 1-4 curves and preoperative shoulder height ≥ 1.0 cm. Patients with preoperative LSE and right shoulder elevation (RSE) were compared. Shoulder height difference < 1 cm was considered 'mild', 1-2 cm was 'moderate', and ≥ 2.0 cm was 'severe'.

RESULTS

407 patients had ≥ 1.0 cm imbalance preoperatively, with 88 (21.6%) LSE. There were no differences in gender (p = 0.855) or age (p = 0.477). Patients with LSE more frequently had Lenke type 2 curves (43.2% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001), while preoperative RSE averaged 1.9 ± 0.9 cm versus 1.6 ± 0.5 cm for LSE (p < 0.001). Those with LSE more often had severe PostSI at 2 years (30.7% vs 5.0%, p < 0.001), and only 26.1% of patients with severe preoperative LSE corrected to mild. In contrast, most patients with RSE had mild PostSI regardless of initial imbalance. When examining only LSE patients, there was no difference in preoperative SH by final UIV (p = 0.101). Further, UIV choice did not impact the proportion of severely unbalanced patients postoperatively (p = 0.446). A PTC > 34.5° was predictive of PostSI ≥ 2.0 cm for patients with preoperative LSE.

CONCLUSION

AIS patients with preoperative LSE are less likely to achieve level shoulders postoperatively. Choice of higher UIV did not affect postoperative shoulder imbalance in this cohort. A PTC > 34.5° was predictive of severe PostSI in patients with preoperative LSE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Analysis of Preoperative and Operative Factors Influencing Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative shoulder imbalance is a common complication in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and may impair patient satisfaction. The little data in the literature on the prediction and treatment of postoperative shoulder imbalance is incongruous. According to some studies, postoperative shoulder imbalance depends on the superior instrumented vertebral bodies, skeletal maturity, extent of correction and flexibility of the major curve.

QUESTION

Can preoperative radiological parameters from X-ray and traction films as well as correction of the curves be used to identify a factor impacting on postoperative shoulder imbalance?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective data in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with thoracic curve (Lenke type 1), operated on between 2015 and 2018 at a scoliosis centre, were analysed retrospectively based on full-length X-rays of the spine (pre-/postOP and follow-up (FU)) and preoperative-traction films: age; correction of proximal, main and lumbar curve; shoulder height [mm]; clavicle angle [°]; T1 tilt [°]; coronal plumb line deviation [mm]. The findings were expressed as means with standard deviation. Changes in parameters over time (postOP-FU) were compared by t test (significance level α = 0.05). The correlation between preOP parameters and extent of correction with postoperative shoulder imbalance (≥ 15 mm) was determined by Pearson correlation and regression classification analysis.

OUTCOMES

55 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, mean age of 15 ± 1.4 years. The FU-rate after a mean of 15 months was 80% (n = 44). Correction of proximal, main and lumbar curve: 47.0%, 75.8% and 68.8%, respectively, without statistically significant change (Δ) in FU (p > 0.05). Shoulder height was - 11.0 ± 12.7 mm (preOP), 15.5 ± 13.4 mm (postOP), 10.1 ± 10.6 mm (FU) (p < 0.05). 38% of those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had preOP right shoulder elevation; 55% (postOP) and 32% (FU) respectively had postoperative shoulder imbalance (left shoulder elevation). Strong statistical correlation was found for Δshoulder position (FU-preOP) with pre-OP shoulder position (r = - 0.7), and Δshoulder position (pre-OP traction films) (r = 0.5) with pre-OP clavicle angle (r = - 0.5). On regression classification analysis, 81.8% of cases did display postoperative shoulder imbalance if proximal curve correction was ≤ 64.4%; main and lumbar curve correction, Δshoulder elevation (preOP traction films) played a secondary role.

DISCUSSION

One common complication even in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is postoperative shoulder imbalance. Preoperative planning should include traction films, preoperative shoulder position and clavicle angle to avoid postoperative shoulder imbalance. Moderate correction of proximal curve is critical for postoperative shoulder balance.

An analysis of preoperative shoulder and neck balance and surgical outcome in 111 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with two subtypes of Lenke 1 curves

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of postoperative shoulder imbalance following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is still high in Lenke 1 curves despite following current treatment recommendations for upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) selection. The objective of this retrospective study was to identify differences in preoperative shoulder balance and to report the surgical outcome of two subtypes of Lenke 1 curves (flexible vs stiff) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

The authors grouped patients' curves as Lenke 1-ve (flexible) when their preoperative proximal thoracic side bending (PTSB) Cobb angle was < 15° and as Lenke 1+ve (stiff) when the PTSB Cobb angle was 15°-24.9°. The authors hypothesized that these two subtypes had distinct preoperative and postoperative shoulder and neck balance following PSF using pedicle screw constructs.

RESULTS

Fifty patients had Lenke 1 (flexible) curves and 61 had Lenke 1 (stiff) curves. The mean preoperative T1 tilt for patients with Lenke 1 (flexible) was -4.9° ± 5.3°, and for those with Lenke 1 (stiff) curves it was -1.0° ± 5.3° (p < 0.001). Mean cervical axis (CA) was -0.1° ± 3.2° for Lenke 1 (flexible) curves and 2.3° ± 3.5° for Lenke 1 (stiff) curves (p < 0.001). Preoperative radiographic shoulder height (RSH) and clavicle angle (Cla-A) were similar between the two curve subtypes. Following surgery, there were significant differences between the subtypes in terms of T1 tilt (p < 0.001), RSH (p = 0.014), and Cla-A (p = 0.031). Interestingly, 41.0% of patients with a Lenke 1 (stiff) curve had +ve T1 tilt compared to 2.0% in Lenke 1 (flexible) group. Moreover, 26.2% of patients with the Lenke 1 (stiff) curve had +ve RSH compared to 12.0% of those with Lenke 1 (flexible) curves. And, 24.6% of patients with Lenke 1 (stiff) had +ve Cla-A compared to 10.0% of those with Lenke 1 (flexible) curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenke 1 (flexible) and Lenke 1 (stiff) curves had distinct preoperative T1 tilt and CA measurements. Following PSF, the authors noted +ve T1 tilt in 41% of patients with Lenke 1 (stiff) curves versus 2.0% in those with Lenke 1 (flexible) curves. The authors also noted a significant difference in postoperative RSH and Cla-A measurements.

Selection of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra and Relative Odds Ratio of Distal Adding-on for Lenke Type 1A and 2A Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

To examine existing literature and pool the data to determine the relative odds ratio of “adding-on” (AO) based on various reported criteria for lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection in Lenke type 1A and 2A curves.

Methods

Using electronic databases, studies reporting on AO and LIV selection in Lenke type 1A and 2A curves were identified. Studies were excluded if they failed to meet the following criteria: ≥ 30 patients, Lenke type 1A or 2A curves, thoracic-only fusions, and inclusion of outcome differences in AO and non-AO groups. Review articles, letters, and case reports were excluded.

Results

Six studies were identified reporting on 732 patients with either Lenke type 1A or 2A curves treated with thoracic-only fusions. Five different landmarks were used for LIV selection in these studies including the stable vertebra (SV) -1, end vertebra (EV) +1, neutral vertebra (NV), touched vertebra (TV), and substantially touched vertebra (STV) versus nonsubstantially touched vertebra (nSTV) +1. The pooled odds ratios of AO for choosing LIV at levels above the afore landmarks (i.e., ending the construct “short”) versus at the landmarks were 2.59 (SV-1), 2.43 (EV+1), 3.05 (NV), 3.40 (TV), and 4.52 (STV/nSTV+1), all at 95% confidence interval.

Conclusion

Five landmarks shared a similar characteristic in that the incidence of AO was significantly higher if the LIV was proximal to the chosen landmark. In addition, choosing STV/(nSTV+1) as the LIV have the lowest absolute risk of AO and the greatest risk reduction. If additional levels were fused (i.e., LIV distal to the landmark), there was no statistically significant benefit in further reducing the risk of AO. Selection of the optimal LIV is a complex issue and spine surgeons must balance the risk of AO with the need for motion preservation in young patients.

Excessive correction impacts postoperative shoulder imbalance in lenke type 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) has a negative impact on the surgical outcomes of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors of PSI in patients with Lenke type 5C curves.

METHODS

This study included 100 patients who underwent posterior correction surgery using pedicle screw constructs for Lenke type 5C curves. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 15.5 ± 2.3 years, and the mean follow-up period was 36.6 ± 15.0 months. The subjects were classified into the following two groups: PSI and non-PSI. Radiographic parameters, including the preoperative and 2-year postoperative coronal and sagittal profiles, were compared between the two groups.

RESULT

PSI was found in eight patients (8.0%). The preoperative Cobb angles were 47.3° ± 8.7° and 48.0° ± 3.9° in the non-PSI and PSI groups, respectively. The correction rate in the PSI group was significantly higher than that in the non-PSI group (81.0% ± 17.7% vs. 67.7% ± 14.7%; p = 0.018). The preoperative T1 tilt angle in the PSI group was significantly larger than that in the non-PSI group (6.1° ± 3.3° vs. 3.1° ± 2.8°; p = 0.005). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve was 0.769 (p = 0.012, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.556-0.982) and 0.763 (p = 0.014, 95% CI, 0.598-0.928) for the correction rate and preoperative T1 tilt, respectively. The cut-off value was 73% and 4° for the correction rate and preoperative T1, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PSI was found in 8.0% of Lenke type 5C curves. Excessive correction of the lumbar curve of >73% and preoperative T1 tilt of >4° can be risk factors for PSI in patients with Lenke type 5C curve.

Postoperative T1 tilt is a risk factor for postoperative distal adding-on in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A preliminary report

Retrospective comparable study.Postoperative loss of correction, which is referred to as the distal adding-on phenomenon, sometimes occurs during the postoperative course in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) has been reported to be one of the significant factors for preventing distal adding-on. However, proximal parameters, such as the Cobb angle of the proximal thoracic (PT) curve, radiographic shoulder height, and T1 tilt, were rarely described in previous reports. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for postoperative distal adding-on, including proximal radiographic parameters, in Lenke type 1 AIS.Preoperative and postoperative radiographs of 34 consecutive patients with Lenke type 1 curve who underwent selective thoracic fusion were analyzed. The patients were divided into an adding-on group and a no-adding-on group according to the presence of adding-on at a 2-year follow-up. The 2 groups were compared with regard to age at surgery, Lenke lumbar modifier, Risser grade, instrumentation type, and radiographic parameters.Distal adding-on was noted in 10 patients (29%). The adding-on group had significant variables including preoperative larger PT Cobb angle (P = .002), larger main thoracic (MT) flexibility (P = .006), smaller thoracolumbar (TL) Cobb angle (P = .012), larger LIV shift (P < .001), larger T1 tilt (P = .001), postoperative larger PT Cobb angle (P = .012), smaller MT Cobb angle (P = .016), smaller TL Cobb angle (P < .001), larger PT-MT mismatch (P < .001), larger LIV shift (P = .026), and larger T1 tilt (P = .006) when compared with the findings in the no-adding-on group. Postoperative T1 tilt was significantly correlated with PT-MT mismatch.Our findings suggest that not only the LIV but also proximal parameters, including T1 tilt and PT-MT mismatch, are associated with postoperative distal adding-on in Lenke type 1 AIS. Strategies to reduce postoperative T1 tilt and PT-MT mismatch are required to prevent distal adding-on.

Predictability of Coronal Curve Flexibility in Postoperative Curve Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Effect of the Sagittal Profile

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To assess how the thoracic kyphosis affects the ability of the fulcrum bending radiograph (FBR) to predict the coronal thoracic curve correction.

METHODS

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was conducted of 107 consecutive patients with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with a standard screw-fixation protocol. Radiographic variables were assessed preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up. Curve flexibility was determined based on the FBR and the Fulcrum Bending Flexibility Index (FBCI). Radiographic variables included preoperative Cobb angle, T5-T12 kyphosis, T12-S1 lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, list, T1-T12 length, truncal shift, and radiographic shoulder height. Patients were also categorized as hypo-, normo-, or hyperkyphotic.

RESULTS

Based on multivariate modeling, an increase in FBR Cobb angle and thoracic kyphosis were significantly associated with an increase in FBCI (increased mismatch between the FBR and postoperative Cobb angles) at 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001). In patients with hyperkyphosis, a longer instrumented length existed despite similar curve size and shorter curve length than the hypo- and normokyphotic groups. Based on these findings, we developed a new predictive postoperative curve correction index, known as the Multiprofile Flexibility Index (MFI).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that an increase in preoperative thoracic kyphosis is associated with an increased difference between the preoperative coronal curve flexibility and the postoperative coronal curve correction. Our findings broaden the understanding of curve flexibility and indicate that selection of fusion levels may need to take into consideration the sagittal profile to improve clinical decision making and optimize outcome.

Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is it safe to fuse shorter than the last touched vertebra?

HYPOTHESIS

Fusing shorter than the last touched vertebra (LTV) is a safe approach in flexible main thoracic (MT) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves.

METHODS

This was a prospective study on consecutive AIS patients surgically treated with selective fusion of the MT curve. Fusion-level selection was based on the fulcrum-bending radiograph method. Patients were grouped based on the position of the lowest instrumented vertebra as proximal to the LTV (proxLTV, n = 43), at the LTV (atLTV, n = 45), and distal to the LTV (distLTV, n = 21).

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients were included in the study. Preoperatively, the distLTV group had greater lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar apical translation, and less flexibility in the MT curve. At 2-year follow-up, the groups did not differ in MT curve correction, but the distLTV had larger lumbar Cobb angle, more apical translation, and worse coronal balance. Distal adding-on was observed in 11 patients (26%) in the proxLTV group, four patients (9%) in the atLTV group, and one patient (5%) in the distLTV group (p = 0.031). Adding-on was associated with younger patients and lower Risser grade at the time of surgery but not with any other radiographic parameter. No differences in SRS-22r scores were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal fusion carries the risk of adding-on, but leaving unfused segments in the lower spine increases the potential for compensatory mechanisms to improve spinal and truncal balance. In mature patients with a flexible MT curve, surgeons may consider fusion at or cranial to the LTV.

Conformity and Changes in the Radiological Neck and Shoulder Balance Parameters Throughout 3-Year Follow-up Period: Do They Remain the Same?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to assess the conformity of the radiological neck and shoulder balance parameters throughout a follow-up period of more than 2 years.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative shoulder and neck imbalance are undesirable features among Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients who underwent Posterior Spinal Fusion. There are many clinical and radiological parameters used to assess this clinical outcome. However, we do not know whether these radiological parameters conform throughout the entire follow-up period.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study done in a single academic institution. Inclusion criteria were patients with scoliosis who underwent posterior instrumented spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation and attended all scheduled follow-ups for at least 24 months postoperatively. Radiological shoulder parameters were measured from both preoperative antero-posterior and postoperative antero-posterior radiographs. Lateral shoulder parameters were: Radiographic Shoulder Height, Clavicle Angle (Cla-A), Clavicle-Rib Intersection Difference, and Coracoid Height Difference. Medial shoulder and neck parameters were: T1 Tilt and Cervical Axis (CA).

RESULTS

The radiographs of 50 patients who had surgery done from November 2013 to November 2015 were analyzed. Mean age of this cohort was 16.3 ± 7.0 years. There were 38 (76%) female patients and 12 (24%) male patients. Mean final follow-up was 38.6 ± 5.8 months. When conformity assessment of the radiological parameter using the interclass coefficient correlation was done, we found that all parameters had significant correlation (P < 0.05). T1 tilt (0.78) had good reliability, CA (0.47), Clavicle-Rib Intersection Difference (0.43), and Coracoid Height Difference (0.40) had moderate reliability and Radiographic Shoulder Height (0.22) and Cla-A (0.13) had poor reliability.

CONCLUSION

All the radiological shoulder and neck balance parameters studied were conformed and suitable to be used to assess the patient postoperatively. Amongst these radiological parameters, T1 tilt followed by CA recorded to be the most reliable parameters over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The Amount of Relative Curve Correction Is More Important Than Upper Instrumented Vertebra Selection for Ensuring Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Lenke Type 1 and Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database.

OBJECTIVE

To assess how "overcorrection" of the main thoracic curve without control of the proximal curve increases the risk for shoulder imbalance in Lenke type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postop shoulder imbalance is a common complication following AIS surgery. It is thought that a more cephalad upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) decreases the risk of shoulder imbalance in Lenke type 1 and 2 curves; however, this has not been proven.

METHODS

Thirteen surgeons reviewed preop and 5-year postop clinical photos and PA radiographs of patients from a large multicenter database with Lenke type 1 and 2 AIS curves who were corrected with pedicle screw/rod constructs. Predictors of postop shoulder imbalance were identified by univariate analysis; multivariate analysis was done using the classification and regression tree method to identify independent drivers of shoulder imbalance.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five patients were reviewed. The UIV was T3-T5 in 87% of patients, with 8.9% instrumented up to T1 or T2. Fifty-two (36%) had shoulder imbalance at 5 years. On classification and regression tree analysis when the proximal thoracic (PT) Cobb angle was corrected more than 52%, 80% of the patients had balanced shoulders. Similarly, when the PT curve was corrected less than 52% and the main thoracic (MT) curve was corrected less than 54%, 87% were balanced. However, when the PT curve was corrected less than 52%, and the MT curve was corrected more than 54%, only 41% of patients had balanced shoulders (P = 0.05). This relationship was maintained regardless of the UIV level.

CONCLUSION

In Lenke type 1 and 2 AIS curves, significant correction of the main thoracic curve (>54%) with simultaneous "under-correction" (<52%) of the upper thoracic curve resulted in shoulder height imbalance in 59% of patients, regardless of the UIV. This suggests the PT curve must be carefully scrutinized in order to optimize shoulder balance, especially when larger correction of the MT curve is performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

The Reliability of Intraoperative Crossbar Technique in Determining the Upper Instrumented Vertebra (UIV) Tilt Angle for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

This study looked into whether crossbar can reliably measure Upper Instrumend Vertebra (UIV) tilt angle intraoperatively and accurately predict the UIV tilt angle postoperatively and at final follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative shoulder imbalance is a common cause of poor cosmetic appearance leading to patient dissatisfaction. There were no reports describing the technique or method in measuring the UIV tilt angle intraoperatively. Therefore, this study was designed to look into the reliability and accuracy of the usage of intraoperative crossbar in measuring the UIV tilt angle intraoperatively.

METHODS

Lenke 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients who underwent instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion using pedicle screw constructs with minimum follow-up of 24 months were recruited for this study. After surgical correction, intraoperative UIV tilt angle was measured using a crossbar. Immediate postoperative and final follow up UIV tilt angle was measured on the standing anteroposterior radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included into this study. The reliability of the intraoperative crossbar to measure the optimal UIV tilt angle intraoperatively was determined by repeated measurements by assessors and measurement by different assessors. We found that the intra observer and inter observer reliability was very good with intraclass correlation coefficient values of >0.9. The accuracy of the intraoperative crossbar to measure the optimal UIV tilt angle intraoperatively was determined by comparing this measurement with the postoperative UIV tilt angle. We found that there was no significant difference (P>0.05) between intraoperative, immediate postoperative, and follow-up UIV tilt angle.

CONCLUSIONS

The crossbar can be used to measure the intraoperative UIV tilt angle consistently and was able to predict the postoperative UIV tilt angle. It was a cheap, simple, reliable, and accurate instrument to measure the intraoperative UIV tilt angle.

How Common Is Medial and Lateral Shoulder Discordance in Lenke 1 and 2 Curves?: A Preoperative Analysis of Medial and Lateral Shoulder Balance Among 151 Lenke 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the incidence and the patterns of medial and lateral shoulder discordance among Lenke 1 and 2 patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) is still common in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This could be due to presence of medial dan lateral shoulder discordance.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-one Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients were recruited. Lenke 1 curves were subclassified into Lenke 1-ve (flexible) (proximal thoracic side bending [PTSB] Cobb angle <15°) and 1+ve curves (stiff) (PTSB Cobb angle between 15° and 24.9°). T1 tilt represented "medial shoulder balance" and radiological shoulder height (RSH) represented "lateral shoulder balance." We categorized patients into three concordant shoulder pattern types (medial balanced/lateral balanced [MBLB], medial imbalanced+ve/lateral imbalanced+ve (MI+ve/LI+ve), medial imbalanced-ve/lateral Imbalanced-ve (MI-ve/LI-ve), and six discordant shoulder pattern types.

RESULTS

The mean age was 16.2 ± 5.7 years. Eighty-one patients (53.6%) had concordant pattern and 70 patients (46.4%) had discordant pattern. Lateral shoulder imbalance was noted in 35.1% of patients and medial shoulder imbalance in 43.7% of patients. In Lenke 1-ve curves, 35 patients (68.6%) had concordant shoulder imbalance with medial imbalanced-ve/lateral imbalanced-ve (MI-ve/LI-ve) being the commonest pattern (68.6%). In Lenke 1+ve curves, 33 patients (55.0%) had concordant shoulder pattern with medial balanced/lateral balanced (MB/LB) being the commonest type (57.6%). In Lenke 2 AIS, 27 patients (67.5%) had discordant pattern with medial imbalanced+ve/lateral balanced (MI+ve/LB) being the commonest pattern (44.4%) (P value = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

46.4% Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients had shoulder discordant pattern. This was more prevalent in Lenke 2 curves (67.5%). In Lenke 1-ve (flexible) curves, MI-ve/LI-ve pattern was the commonest pattern. In Lenke 1+ve curves (stiff), there were almost equal number of concordant and discordant shoulder pattern. In Lenke 2 patients, the most common pattern was MI+ve/LB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Does Symmetric Thoracic Fusion Make a Difference in Lenke 1 A/B AIS Patients?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of correction surgery for Lenke 1 A/B scoliosis among those with symmetric fusion (SF), upper-dominant fusion (UF), and lower-dominant fusion (LF) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Symmetric fusion, defined as equal number of vertebral levels included in instrumented fusion above and below the apical vertebra or disc of the primary curve, was a new concept raised in AIS selective fusion. Previous study showed that similar correction the effect on clinical outcomes of this fusion style.

METHODS

Preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up radiographs of 117 consecutive patients with Lenke type 1A/B curves who underwent posterior selective thoracic instrumentation surgery were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups (SF and nonsymmetric fusion [NSF]). Patients in NSF was further divided into two groups UF (more vertebrate was fused above the apex) and LF (more vertebrate was fused below the apex). Clinical outcomes and coronal decompensation including adding-on and trunk shift were analyzed and compared among three groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between SF and NSF in magnitude of preoperative main thoracic curve (P = 0.69) and correction rate (P = 0.50). Distal adding-on was observed in 21 patients (17.9%), and coronal decompensation was observed in eight patients (6.8%) in all at final follow up. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding adding-on phenomenon (P = 0.64) and coronal imbalance (P = 0.72). Significantly higher rates of adding-on were found in UF compared with SF and LF (P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis between UF and LF in NSF patients, significant differences were found between two subgroups in the rate of trunk shift (P = 0.038). No significant differences in SRS-22 scores were observed among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

In Lenke 1A/B AIS with posterior selective fusion, SF provides no significant differences from NSF. However, in NSF, UF was found to be high risky of adding-on phenomenon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Postoperative Lumbar Curve Progression Deteriorates Shoulder Imbalance in Patients with Lenke Type 2B/C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Who Underwent Selective Thoracic Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between postoperative lumbar curve progression and the shoulder height in patients with Lenke type 2B/C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A total of 25 patients with Lenke type 2B/C AIS underwent posterior correction surgery in our institution from 2005-2014 were included. Standing x-ray films of the whole spine obtained before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at the last follow-up were analyzed with respect to the following parameters: proximal thoracic Cobb angle, main thoracic (MT) Cobb angle, lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar apical vertebral translation, distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line, and radiographic shoulder height (RSH). Correlations between the change of RSH and the changes of other parameters were analyzed both immediately after surgery and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

The change of RSH was significantly negatively correlated with both the change of MT Cobb angle (P < 0.05) and that of lumbar Cobb angle (P < 0.05) immediately after surgery, whereas the interval-time change of RSH was significantly positively correlated with the interval-time change of lumbar Cobb angle (P < 0.05) and that of lumbar apical vertebral translation (P < 0.05) at the last follow-up. The change of MT Cobb angle was an independent predictor for the change of RSH immediately after surgery, whereas the interval-time change of lumbar Cobb angle was an independent predictor for the interval-time change of RSH at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative lumbar curve progression is a risk factor for deterioration of shoulder imbalance in patients with Lenke 2B/C AIS during the follow-up period.

Upper Instrumented Vertebrae (UIV) Tilt Angle Is an Important Postoperative Radiological Parameter That Correlates With Postoperative Neck and Medial Shoulder Imbalance

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between postoperative upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) tilt angle with postoperative medial shoulder and neck imbalance.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Studies had found that current recommendations for UIV selection were not predictive of good postoperative shoulder balance.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Lenke 1/2 curves who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2013 and 2014 with minimum follow-up of 2 years were recruited. Radiological parameters: UIV tilt angle, T1 tilt, cervical axis, and clavicle angle were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age was 16.2 ± 6.2 years. Mean follow-up was 37.9 ± 6.5 months. There were 73.5% Lenke 1 and 26.5% Lenke 2 curves. Significant factors affecting postoperative T1 Tilt were postoperative UIV tilt angle, preoperative T1 tilt, and preoperative UIV tilt angle. Postoperative UIV tilt angle and preoperative cervical axis were significant factors affecting cervical axis at final follow-up. UIV level was not significant independent factor that affected postoperative T1 tilt and cervical axis. There was strong correlation between postoperative UIV tilt angle and T1 tilt for the whole cohort (P < 0.001), when UIV was at T2 (P < 0.001), T3 (P < 0.001), and T4 (P < 0.001). Postoperative UIV tilt angle also had significant correlation with cervical axis when UIV was at T2 (P = 0.021) and T3 (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative UIV tilt angle was an independent factor, which had significant correlation with postoperative T1 tilt and cervical axis measurement. There was strong correlation between postoperative UIV tilt angle and T1 tilt for the whole cohort, when UIV was at T3 and T4. There was very strong correlation between postoperative UIV tilt angle and T1 tilt when UIV was at T2. There was also moderate and significant correlation between postoperative UIV tilt angle and cervical axis for the whole cohort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Fulcrum flexibility of the main curve predicts postoperative shoulder imbalance in selective thoracic fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To identify preoperative predictors for postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) after corrective surgery of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and using the fulcrum-bending radiograph to assess flexibility.

METHODS

A consecutive surgical cohort of AIS patients undergoing selective thoracic fusion with alternate-level pedicle screw fixation was prospectively studied. Preoperative anteroposterior, lateral and fulcrum-bending radiographs were analysed. Postoperatively, a minimum of 2 years clinical and imaging follow-up was performed of all patients. PSI was defined as a radiographic shoulder height difference of more than 20 mm.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were included, and 14 patients (18%) were confirmed with PSI at final follow-up. The flexibility of MT curve was an independent risk factor for PSI (odds ratio (OR) = 3.3 per 10% decrease, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-8.2). Twenty-seven patients had a preoperative MT flexibility of < 55% (OR = 11.5, 95% CI 2.8-46.2). Postoperative T1 tilt was significantly higher in the PSI group (p < 0.001), and a T1 tilt of more than 9° resulted in 7.2 times higher odds of developing PSI (95% CI 2.0-26.0). Fulcrum-bending correction index (FBCI) was significantly higher in the PSI group at final follow-up, and 25 patients had a final postoperative MT FBCI above 120% (OR = 8.5 (95% CI 2.3-31.0).

CONCLUSIONS

A low preoperative curve flexibility is a significant predictor for PSI. The surgical strategy should consider proximal fusion in presence of low-flexibility MT curves and consider less aggressive MT curve correction. Achieving a level T1 should be a main priority during intraoperative correction and may require fusion of the PT curve.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Characteristics of the "Adding-On" Phenomenon in Idiopathic Scoliosis After Correction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the prevalence, risk factors, and characteristics of the "adding-on" phenomenon in idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are controversies on the prevalence and risk factors of the "adding-on" phenomenon. In addition, there is no comprehensive study to describe the characteristics of "adding-on" in IS patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic online search using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China WeiPu Library to identify eligible studies. Effect size (ES), odds ratios (OR), and weight mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and risk factors for "adding-on," respectively.

RESULTS

The overall pooled prevalence of "adding-on" was 14%. Subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of "adding-on" in Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Lenke 2 AIS, Lenke 5 AIS, and mixed AIS was 15%, 12%, 9%, and 16%, respectively. AIS patients with the "adding-on" phenomenon had smaller proximal thoracic curve (PTC), main thoracic curve (MTC), clavicle angle, T1 tilt angle and radiographic shoulder height (RSH), and larger correction of PTC. Age, Risser sign, preoperative PTC, preoperative MTC, preoperative lumbar curve (LC), preoperative coronal balance and sagittal balance, and T4 tile were identified as risk factors of "adding-on." Selection of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was also an important risk factor as LIV-Center Sacral Vertical Line (CSVL), LIV-end vertebra, LIV-Stable Vertebra, and LIV-Neutral vertebra, and deviation of LIV+1 was found to be significantly associated with "adding-on." Besides, postoperative MTC was also significantly different between patients with and without "adding-on."

CONCLUSION

The pooled prevalence varied differently in different types of IS. Patients with "adding-on" had smaller PTC, MTC, angle, T1 tilt angle and RSH, and larger correction of PTC. Younger age, less skeletal maturity, smaller preoperative PTC, smaller preoperative MTC, smaller preoperative LC, larger preoperative coronal, sagittal imbalance, selection of LIV, and overcorrection of coronal and sagittal alignment were risk factors for "adding-on."

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Selecting the LSTV as the Lower Instrumented Vertebra in the Treatment of Lenke Types 1A and 2A Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Minimal 3-year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to verify the last substantially touched vertebra (LSTV) as the ideal lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and to identify predictive factors of adding-on in patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A curve patterns when LSTV was chosen as the LIV.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although several studies have indicated that the use of the LSTV as the LIV can obtain favorable outcomes in Lenke 1A and 2A curves, the factors identifying patients with Lenke 1A and 2A curve patterns who should undergo a fusion extending beyond the LSTV have not been identified.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with Lenke 1 and 2 curves after posterior instrumentation and fusion to the LSTV were evaluated. All patients had a minimum 3-year follow-up. Patients were grouped based on the occurrence of the distal adding-on phenomenon: an adding-on group and a no adding-on group. We analyzed the significant independent factors associated with adding-on via univariate analysis and then via stepwise logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Distal adding-on was observed in 16 patients (13.33%). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the Risser sign (OR = 0.592, P = 0.033), preoperative distance between the LIV and the center sacral vertical line (CSVL) (LIV-CSVL) (OR = 1.286, P = 0.002), and postoperative thoracic kyphosis (T5-T12) (OR = 0.784, P = 0.002) were primary factors for distal adding-on.

CONCLUSION

Selecting the LSTV as the LIV simplifies the selection of the LIV and is an effective operation strategy in patients with Lenke 1A and 2A curve types. Patients with lower Risser sign, larger preoperative LIV-CSVL, and postoperative thoracic hypokyphosis are more likely to develop distal adding-on at 3-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Natural History of Postoperative Adding-On in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Risk Factors for Progressive Adding-On?

Purpose

To investigate the natural history of distal adding-on in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to identify risk factors for its progression.

Methods

Sixty-one AIS patients with distal adding-on occurrence were included. We further classify distal adding-on into progressive and nonprogressive group according to its natural evolution. The first radiograph indicating initiation of adding-on (primary adding-on) and the last follow-up radiograph were compared in terms of the deviation of the first vertebra below instrumentation from the CSVL and the angulation of the first disc below instrumentation. Compared to primary adding-on, progressive adding-on was defined as a further increase of deviation > 5 mm or a further increase of angulation > 5°. Risk factors associated with the progression of adding-on were analyzed.

Results

Among 61 patients diagnosed with distal adding-on, 24 (39.3%) were progressive and 37 (60.7%) were nonprogressive. Lower Risser grade, open triradiate cartilage, and lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) proximal to Substantially Stable Vertebra (SSV) were found to be significantly associated with the progressive adding-on. Besides, the distal adding-on was more likely to progress for patients with higher left shoulders than right ones after surgery.

Conclusions

The risk factors for the progression of adding-on included skeletal immaturity, LIV proximal to SSV, and higher left shoulders after surgery.

Distal adding-on phenomenon in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with thoracolumbar vertebra fusion: A case-control study

The adding-on phenomenon is a common complication in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients after correction surgery. However, the risk factors of previous studies and the optimal treatment strategies remain controversial. The aim of this study was to identify new risk factors for the adding-on phenomenon after posterior correction surgery in AIS patients and compare different treatment strategies to guide the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV).All types of Lenke AIS patients who received correction surgery at our center from January 2009 to July 2014 were analyzed. The anteroposterior and lateral films were evaluated before surgery, at the 2-week follow-up, and at the 2-year or later follow-up. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether adding-on was observed at the last follow-up. The factors predictive of the adding-on phenomenon were identified in a multivariate binary logistic regression model. Different methods for LIV selection were compared in both the adding-on group and the control group (no adding-on).Out of the 346 patients reviewed, 92 met the inclusion criteria; 22 of these met the definition for distal adding-on, and were included in adding-on group. The remaining 70 patients were included in the no adding-on group. The average follow-up was 3.6 years. Touch classification (P < .000), Dnfs (P = .005), and vertebra number between LIV and angle velocity (AV) (P = .001) were significantly different between the 2 groups. Age, gender, Risser sign, and screw density were not found to be affiliated with the presence of adding-on. The results of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 were not significantly different between the adding-on group and the control group for any section or overall (P > .05). Binary logistic regression results indicated that postoperative LAV deviation from the CSVL and Touch classification were independent predictive factors. Among the 4 methods, only choosing touch type A as LIV shows satisfactory outcome.The Touch classification is an important risk factor that is highly correlated with the incidence of the adding-on phenomenon. The best LIV choice to preserve the lumbar activity segment as much as possible is Touch type C, and no significant difference was observed in the SRS-22 scores between the Touch type C group and the control group in the short-term follow-up.