Defining clinically relevant values for developmental spinal stenosis: a large-scale magnetic resonance imaging study

Congenital Stenosis of the Spine-A Cross-Sectional Study of 1019 Whole-Spine Computed Tomography Scans to Determine Prevalence and Association Among Multilevel, Tandem, and Triple Region Stenosis

BACKGOUND

Patients with congenital stenosis of the spine (CSS) present with clinical symptoms at an early age and fewer degenerative hypertrophic changes than the more common degenerative cohort. Literature is lacking in the true prevalence of CSS affecting the 3 segments of the spine in isolation, as well as in tandem in the Indian subcontinent.

METHODS

Anteroposterior spinal canal diameter in axial plane computed tomography at the midvertebral level was measured in asymptomatic patients with whole-spine computed tomography. Spinal canal stenosis was defined as a diameter of <12 mm for the cervical region, <12 mm for the thoracic region, and <13 mm for the lumbar region. Single-level and multilevel stenosis, as well as tandem and triple-region stenosis, were evaluated.

RESULTS

The results show the prevalence of CSS as 16.6%, 11.5%, and 20.1% involving the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, respectively. Single-level stenosis affected 90.6%, 94%, and 79.8% of the patients with cervical, thoracic, and lumbar CSS, respectively. Tandem stenosis affected 10.4% of the population (n = 104), with cervicolumbar stenosis being the most prevalent (n = 51, 5%). The presence of CSS in any one segment of the spine was significantly associated with the presence of stenosis at one of the other segments (P < 0.05). Triple-region stenosis was seen in 0.3% (n = 3) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of cervical, thoracic, lumbar and tandem stenosis from our study is established at 16.6%, 11.5%, 20.1%, and 10.4%. Additionally, our study demonstrates the association between stenosis of the different regions of the spine.

The correlation between lumbar interlaminar space size on plain radiograph and spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

Investigating the correlation between the interlaminar space size on plain radiograph and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

100 Patients with LSS and 100 normal participants without LSS were included in this study. Lumbar interlaminar parameters were measured on plain radiographs. Spinal canal parameters were measure on CT and MRI. These image parameters were compared between LSS and control group. The linear correlation among interlaminar parameters, spinal canal parameters and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were analyzed. The cut-off values of interlaminar parameters for diagnosing L3/4 and L4/5 symptomatic LSS were analyzed.

RESULTS

Excepting for L1/2 interlaminar width, all interlaminar and spinal canal related parameters in LSS group were significantly smaller than those in control group. Excepting for L1/2 interlaminar width and L5/S1 interlaminar height, all interlaminar parameters had significantly positive linear correlation with spinal canal parameters accordingly in each lumbar level. For diagnosis of symptomatic LSS, The cut off values of L4/5 interlaminar width, height and area were 18.46 mm, 11.37 mm and 134.05 mm2 while 15.78 mm, 13.59 mm and 157.98 mm2 in L3/4. Both spinal canal size and interlaminar size had no linear correlation with ODI in cases of L4/5 LSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar interlaminar space size on plain radiograph has positive linear correlation with developmental and degenerative LSS, excepting for L1/2 interlaminar width and L5/S1 interlaminar height. Lumbar plain radiograph can be a feasible way for predicting and helping to diagnose LSS through evaluating the interlaminar space size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lumbar spinal stenosis, 2021 - Secondary publication

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) guideline for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) was first published in 2011. Since then, the medical care system for LSS has changed and many new articles regarding the epidemiology and diagnostics of LSS, conservative treatments such as new pharmacotherapy and physical therapy, and surgical treatments including minimally invasive surgery have been published. In addition, various issues need to be examined, such as verification of patient-reported outcome measures, and the economic effect of revised medical management of patients with lumbar spinal disorders. Accordingly, in 2019 the JOA clinical guidelines committee decided to update the guideline and consequently established a formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline, incorporating the recent advances of evidence-based medicine.

METHODS

The JOA LSS guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on the method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by the Medical Information Network Distribution Service in 2017. Background and clinical questions were determined followed by a literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles based on keywords were selected from all the searched literature. Using prepared structured abstracts, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed. The strength of evidence and recommendations for each clinical question was decided by the committee members.

RESULTS

Eight background and 15 clinical questions were determined. Answers and explanations were described for the background questions. For each clinical question, the strength of evidence and the recommendation were both decided, and an explanation was provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of LSS was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We expect that this guideline will be useful for all medical providers as an index in daily medical care, as well as for patients with LSS.

Learning-based fully automated prediction of lumbar disc degeneration progression with specified clinical parameters and preliminary validation

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) may be related to aging, biomechanical and genetic factors. Despite the extensive work on understanding its etiology, there is currently no automated tool for accurate prediction of its progression.

PURPOSE

We aim to establish a novel deep learning-based pipeline to predict the progression of LDD-related findings using lumbar MRIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We utilized our dataset with MRIs acquired from 1,343 individual participants (taken at the baseline and the 5-year follow-up timepoint), and progression assessments (the Schneiderman score, disc bulging, and Pfirrmann grading) that were labelled by spine specialists with over ten years clinical experience. Our new pipeline was realized by integrating the MRI-SegFlow and the Visual Geometry Group-Medium (VGG-M) for automated disc region detection and LDD progression prediction correspondingly. The LDD progression was quantified by comparing the Schneiderman score, disc bulging and Pfirrmann grading at the baseline and at follow-up. A fivefold cross-validation was conducted to assess the predictive performance of the new pipeline.

RESULTS

Our pipeline achieved very good performances on the LDD progression prediction, with high progression prediction accuracy of the Schneiderman score (Accuracy: 90.2 ± 0.9%), disc bulging (Accuracy: 90.4% ± 1.1%), and Pfirrmann grading (Accuracy: 89.9% ± 2.1%).

CONCLUSION

This is the first attempt of using deep learning to predict LDD progression on a large dataset with 5-year follow-up. Requiring no human interference, our pipeline can potentially achieve similar predictive performances in new settings with minimal efforts.

The value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the study of spinal disorders

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have replaced conventional radiography in the study of many spinal conditions, it is essential to know when these techniques are indicated instead of or as complementary tests to radiography, which findings can be expected in different clinical settings, and their significance in the diagnosis of different spinal conditions. Proper use of CT and MRI in spinal disorders may facilitate diagnosis and management of spinal conditions. An adequate clinical approach, a good understanding of the pathological manifestations demonstrated by these imaging techniques and a comprehensive report based on a universally accepted nomenclature represent the indispensable tools to improve the diagnostic approach and the decision-making process in patients with spinal pain. Several guidelines are available to assist clinicians in ordering appropriate imaging techniques to achieve an accurate diagnosis and to ensure appropriate medical care that meets the efficacy and safety needs of patients. This article reviews the clinical indications of CT and MRI in different pathologic conditions affecting the spine, including congenital, traumatic, degenerative, inflammatory, infectious and tumor disorders, as well as their main imaging features. It is intended to be a pictorial guide to clinicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal disorders.

Prevalence and Definition of Multilevel Lumbar Developmental Spinal Stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES

To define multilevel lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) using a composite score model and to determine its prevalence.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of 2385 openly recruited subjects with lumbosacral (L1-S1) MRIs. All subjects with previous spinal surgery or spinal deformities were excluded. The anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameter was measured by two independent observers. Any associations between level-specific vertebral canal diameter and subject body habitus were analysed with non-parametric tests. Three or more stenotic levels, equivalent to a composite score of 3 or more, were considered as multilevel DSS. The median values of these subjects' AP canal diameters were used to construct the multilevel DSS values. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was utilized to determine the ability of these cut-off values to screen for DSS by presenting their area under curve, sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Subject body habitus was poorly correlated with AP vertebral canal diameter. Multilevel DSS was identified as L1<19 mm, L2<19 mm, L3<18 mm, L4<18 mm, L5<18 mm, S1<16 mm with 81%-96% sensitivity and 72%-91% specificity. The prevalence of multilevel DSS in this cohort was 7.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a large homogeneous cohort, the prevalence of multilevel DSS is determined. Our cut-offs provide high diagnostic accuracy. Patients with multiple levels that fulfil these criteria may be at-risk of spinal canal compressions at multiple sites.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Postlaminectomy lumbopelvic sagittal changes in patients with developmental lumbar spinal stenosis grouped into Roussouly lumbopelvic sagittal profiles: 2- to 10-year prospective follow-up

OBJECTIVE

Roussouly lumbopelvic sagittal profiles are associated with distinct pathologies or distinct natural histories and prognoses. The associations between developmental lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) and native lumbopelvic sagittal profiles are unknown. Moreover, the relative effects of multilevel decompression on lumbar sagittal alignment, geometrical parameters of the pelvis, and compensatory mechanisms for each of the Roussouly subtypes are unknown. This study aimed to explore the association between DLSS and native lumbar lordosis (LL) subtypes. It also attempts to understand the natural history of postlaminectomy lumbopelvic sagittal changes and compensatory mechanisms for each of the Roussouly subtypes and to define the critical lumbar segment or specific lordosis arc that is recruited after relief of the stenosis effect.

METHODS

A total of 418 patients with multilevel DLSS were grouped into various Roussouly subtypes, and lumbopelvic sagittal parameters were prospectively compared at follow-up intervals of preoperative to < 2 years, 2 to < 5 years, and 5 to ≥ 10 years after laminectomy. The variables analyzed included LL, upper lordosis arc from L1 to L4, lower lordosis arc from L4 to S1, and segmental lordosis from L1 to S1. Pelvic parameters included pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence minus LL values.

RESULTS

Of the 329 patients who were followed up throughout this study, 33.7% had Roussouly type 1 native lordosis, whereas the incidence rates of types 2, 3, and 4 were 33.4%, 21.9%, and 10.9%, respectively. LL was not reduced in any of the Roussouly subtypes after multilevel decompressions. Instead, LL increased by 4.5° (SD 11.9°-from 27.3° [SD 11.5°] to 31.8° [SD 9.8°]) in Roussouly type 1 and by 3.1° (SD 11.6°-from 41.3° [SD 9.5°] to 44.4° [SD = 9.7°]) in Roussouly type 2. The other Roussouly types showed no significant changes. Pelvic tilt decreased significantly-by 2.8°, whereas sacral slope increased significantly-by 2.9° in Roussouly type 1 and by 1.7° in Roussouly type 2. The critical lumbar segment that recruits LL differs between Roussouly subtypes. Increments and changes were sustained until the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings are important in predicting patient prognosis, LL evolution, and the need for prophylactic or corrective deformity surgery. Multilevel involvement in DLSS and the high prevalence of Roussouly types 1 and 2 suggest that spinal canal dimensions are closely linked to the developmental evolution of LL.

The Modic-endplate-complex phenotype in cervical spine patients: Association with symptoms and outcomes

This study describes a novel, combined Modic changes (MC) and structural endplate abnormality phenotype of the cervical spine, which we have termed the Modic-Endplate-Complex (MEC), and its association with preoperative symptoms and outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients. This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data at a single institution. Preoperative cervical magnetic resonance imagings were used to assess the presence of MC and endplate abnormalities. Patients were divided into four groups: MC-only, endplate abnormality-only, the MEC and controls. The MEC was defined as the presence of both a MC and endplate abnormality in the cervical spine. Phenotypes were further stratified by location and compared to controls. Associations with patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using regression controlling for baseline characteristics. A total of 628 patients were included, with 84 MC-only, 166 endplate abnormality-only, and 187 MEC patients. Both MC (p < 0.001) and endplate abnormalities (p < 0.001) were independently associated with one another. MC at the adjacent level (p = 0.018), endplate abnormalities (regardless of location) (p = 0.001), and the MEC within the fusion segment (p = 0.027) were all associated with higher Neck Disability Index scores. Both MC within the fusion segment (p = 0.008) and endplate abnormalities within the fusion segment (p = 0.017) associated with lower Veteran's Rand 12-item scores. MC and structural endplate abnormalities commonly manifest concomitantly in patients indicated for ACDF for degenerative pathology. Patients with the endplate pathology, including the MEC phenotype, reported significantly higher levels of postoperative disability following ACDF. These findings add valuable data to the prognostic assessment of degenerative cervical spine patients.

Pedigree analysis of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis: Determination of potential inheritance patterns

Lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) refers to multilevel pre-existing narrowed spinal canals, which predispose to neural compromise. The objective of this study is to identify any inheritance pattern of DSS by utilizing pedigree charts. This was a case series of 13 families with a total of 80 subjects having magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from L1 to S1. Cases (subjects with DSS) or controls (subjects without DSS) were identified by measuring their anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameters. Multilevel model analyses were also performed to evaluate whether there is substantial clustering of observations within the families, and the effect of multilevel DSS. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Akaike information criteria (AIC) were compared between models. Correlations between subject demographics and AP vertebral canal diameter were statistically insignificant at all levels. Only vertebral canal cross-sectional area, and axial and sagittal vertebral canal diameter were found to be statistically different between cases and controls at all levels (all p < .05). Both males and females were affected by DSS and there was no skipping of generation, which highly suggested DSS followed an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. After accounting for multilevel DSS, there was a drop of more than 10 in AIC and some variances were also explained within families. This is the first study that suggests multilevel lumbar DSS to have an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. Within families with a background of DSS, subjects had a smaller canal size, contributed by shortened axial and sagittal AP vertebral canal diameter, and smaller canal cross-sectional area.

The profile of the spinal column in subjects with lumbar developmental spinal stenosis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the differences in spinal imaging characteristics between subjects with or without lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

This was a radiological analysis of 2,387 participants who underwent L1-S1 MRI. Means and ranges were calculated for age, sex, BMI, and MRI measurements. Anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameters were used to differentiate those with DSS from controls. Other imaging parameters included vertebral body dimensions, spinal canal dimensions, disc degeneration scores, and facet joint orientation. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for measurement differences between those with DSS and controls. In order to identify possible associations between DSS and MRI parameters, those who were statistically significant in the univariate binary logistic regression were included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression after adjusting for demographics. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported where appropriate.

RESULTS

Axial AP vertebral canal diameter (p < 0.001), interpedicular distance (p < 0.001), AP dural sac diameter (p < 0.001), lamina angle (p < 0.001), and sagittal mid-vertebral body height (p < 0.001) were significantly different between those identified as having DSS and controls. Narrower interpedicular distance (OR 0.745 (95% CI 0.618 to 0.900); p = 0.002) and AP dural sac diameter (OR 0.506 (95% CI 0.400 to 0.641); p < 0.001) were associated with DSS. Lamina angle (OR 1.127 (95% CI 1.045 to 1.214); p = 0.002) and right facet joint angulation (OR 0.022 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.247); p = 0.002) were also associated with DSS. No association was observed between disc parameters and DSS.

CONCLUSION

From this large-scale cohort, the canal size is found to be independent of body stature. Other than spinal canal dimensions, abnormal orientations of lamina angle and facet joint angulation may also be a result of developmental variations, leading to increased likelihood of DSS. Other skeletal parameters are spared. There was no relationship between DSS and soft tissue changes of the spinal column, which suggests that DSS is a unique result of bony maldevelopment. These findings require validation in other ethnicities and populations. Level of Evidence: I (diagnostic study) Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):725-733.

Clinical implications of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis on back pain, radicular leg pain, and disability

AIMS

To study the associations of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) with low back pain (LBP), radicular leg pain, and disability.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of 2,206 subjects along with L1-S1 axial and sagittal MRI. Clinical and radiological information regarding their demographics, workload, smoking habits, anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameter, spondylolisthesis, and MRI changes were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for differences between subjects with and without DSS. Associations of LBP and radicular pain reported within one month (30 days) and one year (365 days) of the MRI, with clinical and radiological information, were also investigated by utilizing univariate and multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Subjects with DSS had higher prevalence of radicular leg pain, more pain-related disability, and lower quality of life (all p < 0.05). Subjects with DSS had 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.1; p = 0.027) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.6; p = 0.001) times higher odds of having radicular leg pain in the past month and the past year, respectively. However, DSS was not associated with LBP. Although, subjects with a spondylolisthesis had 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.5; p = 0.011) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.2; p = 0.008) times greater odds to experience LBP in the past month and the past year, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This large-scale study identified DSS as a risk factor of acute and chronic radicular leg pain. DSS was seen in 6.9% of the study cohort and these patients had narrower spinal canals. Subjects with DSS had earlier onset of symptoms, more severe radicular leg pain, which lasted for longer and were more likely to have worse disability and poorer quality of life. In these patients there is an increased likelihood of nerve root compression due to a pre-existing narrowed canal, which is important when planning surgery as patients are likely to require multi-level decompression surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):131-140.

Modified minimally invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under microscopic view to achieve bilateral decompression and fusion through a single approach to treat developmental lumbar spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

To describe a modified minimally invasive spine (MIS) procedure to treat lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) to achieve complete decompression and fusion. The method preserves the muscles, ligaments, and most of the bony structures. DSS is not considered a good indication for MIS procedures and few reports discuss alternative treatments. Because MIS has the advantages of low blood loss, rapid recovery, and short hospital stay, it would be ideal for DSS.

METHODS

After confirming the screw positions, we placed a tube retractor in the facet joint on the decompressed side. The inferior facet joint and part of the superior joint of the lower segment were removed, the spinal canal was carefully exposed under a microscopic view, and fusion was performed through Kambin's triangle. Next, the operation table was rotated to the contralateral side and angled to approximately 15-20 degrees. We then tilted the tube retractor in the facet joint toward the operation side by 15-20 degrees, which provided access to the contralateral canal for decompression. The ligament flavum was carefully removed and the dural sac was gently retracted to expose the lateral recess on the other side. We then examined the nerve root on the contralateral side to ensure there was no compression.

RESULTS

Eight patients with lumbar DSS were treated using this method. Patients' neurological symptoms improved greatly without complications and patients were able to walk the day after surgery. The inner plate of the contralateral lamina and muscle as well as most of the ligaments that contribute to stability were preserved.

CONCLUSION

This modified MIS decompression procedure successfully treated DSS by providing spinal canal decompression and preserving most of the stabilizing structures.

Increased thickness of lumbar spine ligamentum flavum in wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis

BACKGROUND

Wild-type transthyretin (ATTRwt) amyloid deposits have been found in the ligamentum flavum of patients undergoing surgery for spinal stenosis. The relationship between ATTRwt and ligamentum flavum thickness is unclear. We used pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to analyze ligamentum flavum thickness in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with and without ATTRwt amyloid.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 178 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery. Ligamentum flavum thickness of 253 specimens was measured on T2-weighted axial MRI. Amyloid presence was confirmed through Congo red staining of specimens, and ATTRwt was confirmed using mass-spectrometry and gene sequencing.

RESULTS

Twenty four of the 178 patients (13.5%) were found to have ATTRwt in the ligamentum flavum. Forty ATTRwt specimens and 213 non-ATTRwt specimens were measured. Mean ligamentum flavum thickness was 4.92 (±1.27) mm in the ATTRwt group and 4.00 (±1.21) mm in the non-ATTRwt group (p < 0.01). The ligamentum flavum was thickest at L4-L5, with a thickness of 5.15 (±1.27) mm and 4.23 (±1.29) mm in the ATTRwt and non-ATTRwt group, respectively (p = 0.007). There was a significant difference in ligamentum flavum thickness between ATTRwt and non-ATTRwt case for both patients younger than 70 years (p = 0.016) and those older than 70 years (p = 0.004). ATTRwt patients had greater ligamentum flavum thickness by 0.83 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-1.25 mm, p < 0.001) when controlled for age and lumbar level.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ATTRwt had thicker ligamentum flavum compared to patients without ATTRwt. Further studies are needed to investigate the pathophysiology of ATTRwt in ligamentum flavum thickening.

Cost analysis comparison between conventional microsurgical decompression and full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery

Background

Two of the most commonly used techniques for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) include full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression (MIS) and conventional microsurgical decompression (CD). Although these procedures have proven efficacy for relief of stenotic symptoms, in this age of increased concerns for healthcare cost, weighing the respective accumulative costs is essential for deciding which approach to adopt. The aim of this study is to perform a cost analysis comparison between MIS and CD for LSS.

Methods

A decision analysis model comparing MIS and CD for patients with LSS over a 1-year time horizon was conducted. Relevant unit costs associated with each surgical procedure and each possible complication treatment were estimated. Regarding the respective complication rates for each procedure, data was retrieved from the literature. Reoperation was considered for epidural hematoma, inadequate decompression or iatrogenic instability requiring fusion. Nonoperative treatment for complications like infection was also considered.

Results

The average total costs for MIS and CD were found to be HKD$54,863 and HKD$52,748 respectively. Both procedures carried similar costs in terms of hospitalization, radiology and routine follow-up visits. A 3.9% (HKD$2,115) difference in total cost was largely due to the differences in cost of surgery and complications. MIS costs 5.7% more than CD for an operation but was 28.1% less costly than MIS for complications.

Conclusions

Given the similar clinical effectiveness of either procedure and only a small difference in overall cost, our findings suggest that surgeons should perform the procedure that they are competent with which guarantees adequacy of decompression.

Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: does age matter?

OBJECTIVE

Age is commonly thought to be a risk factor in defining lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) degenerative or developmental subtypes. This article is a follow-up to a previous article ("Redefining Lumbar Spinal Stenosis as a Developmental Syndrome: An MRI-Based Multivariate Analysis of Findings in 709 Patients Throughout the 16- to 82-Year Age Spectrum") that describes the radiological differences between developmental and degenerative types of LSS. MRI-based analysis of "degeneration" variables and spinal canal morphometric characteristics of LSS segments have been thought to correlate with age at presentation.

METHODS

The authors performed a re-analysis of data from their previously reported prospective MRI-based study, stratifying data from the 709 cases into 3 age categories of equal size (instead of the original < 60 vs ≥ 60 years). Relative spinal canal dimensions, as well as radiological degenerative variables from L1 to S1, were analyzed across age groups in a multivariate mode. The total degenerative scale score (TDSS) for each lumbar segment from L1 to S1 was calculated for each patient. The relationships between age and qualitative stenosis grades, TDSS, disc degeneration, and facet degeneration were analyzed using Pearson's product-moment correlation and multiple regression.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of TDSS and spinal canal dimensions revealed highly significant differences across the 3 age groups at L2-3 and L3-4 and a weaker, but still significant, association with changes at L5-S1. Age helped to explain only 9.6% and 12.2% of the variance in TDSS at L1-2 and L2-3, respectively, with a moderate positive correlation, and 7.8%, 1.2%, and 1.9% of the variance in TDSS at L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1, respectively, with weak positive correlation. Age explained 24%, 26%, and 18.4% of the variance in lumbar intervertebral disc (LID) degeneration at L1-2, L2-3, and L3-4, respectively, while it explained only 6.2% and 7.2% of the variance of LID degeneration at L4-5 and L5-S1, respectively. Age explained only 2.5%, 4.0%, 1.2%, 0.8%, and 0.8% of the variance in facet degeneration at L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Age at presentation correlated weakly with degeneration variables and spinal canal morphometries in LSS segments. Age correlated with upper lumbar segment (L1-4) degeneration more than with lower segment (L4-S1) degeneration. The actual chronological age of the patients did not significantly correlate with the extent of degenerative pathology of the lumbar stenosis segments. These study results lend support for a developmental contribution to LSS.

Novel compression rat model for developmental spinal stenosis

Developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) is characterized by pre-existing circumferential narrowing of the bony spinal canal which predisposes neural tissue to compression. This study aims to create a reproducible animal model mimicking DSS for investigation of its pathoanatomy. Developmental spinal canal constriction was simulated using circumferential compression. Eighteen female Sprague-Dawley rats (13.0-14.5 weeks-old) underwent circumferential compression at L4-L5 using silicone sheets; or dorsal compression using overlapping silicone sheets; or as controls. A series of outcome scores were used for locomotor function assessment, together with electrophysiological and histological assessment. Assessment time-points were at preoperative, postoperative 1-week, 2-weeks, 3-weeks, 1-month, and pre-sacrifice. Statistical analyses were performed. At all postoperative time-points, circumferential group had the worst mean Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan locomotor scores with significant difference from the control group (p < 0.05), as well as the lowest mean Louisville Swim Scale scores, as compared to the dorsal (p < 0.05) and to the control (p < 0.01) groups. Circumferential group had worse mean foot fault score for both hindlimbs (p < 0.01 to p < 0.05) and highest error rate in foot placement accuracy, especially higher than dorsal (p < 0.05) and control (p < 0.05) groups at pre-sacrifice. Electrophysiological assessment revealed postoperative increase in P1 latency was higher in circumferential than dorsal compression. Highest postoperative mean P1 latency was observed for both paws at all postoperative time-points for circumferential group (except at postoperative 1-week). Circumferential group had lower myelin-to-axonal area ratio and higher g-ratio than both the dorsal and control groups (p < 0.001). For each study group, hindlimb P1 latency and P1-N1 amplitude were each correlated with g-ratio (p < 0.05); and mean myelin-to-axonal area ratio correlated with P1 latency of both hindlimbs (p < 0.05). Based on these more severe axonal demyelination and neurological deficits, a valid DSS rat model is created with somatosensory evoked potential neuro-monitoring technique. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.

The influence of developmental spinal stenosis on the risk of re-operation on an adjacent segment after decompression-only surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) on the risk of re-operation at an adjacent level.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective study of 235 consecutive patients who had undergone decompression-only surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis and had a minimum five-year follow-up. There were 106 female patients (45.1%) and 129 male patients (54.9%), with a mean age at surgery of 66.8 years (sd 11.3). We excluded those with adult deformity and spondylolisthesis. Presenting symptoms, levels operated on initially and at re-operation were studied. MRI measurements included the anteroposterior diameter of the bony spinal canal, the degree of disc degeneration, and the thickness of the ligamentum flavum. DSS was defined by comparative measurements of the bony spinal canal. Risk factors for re-operation at the adjacent level were determined and included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression for prediction modelling. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Results

Of the 235 patients, 21.7% required re-operation at an adjacent segment. Re-operation at an adjacent segment was associated with DSS (p = 0.026), the number of levels decompressed (p = 0.008), and age at surgery (p = 0.013). Multivariate regression model (p < 0.001) controlled for other confounders showed that DSS was a significant predictor of re-operation at an adjacent segment, with an adjusted OR of 3.93.

Conclusion

Patients with DSS who have undergone lumbar spinal decompression are 3.9 times more likely to undergo future surgery at an adjacent level. This is a poor prognostic indicator that can be identified prior to index decompression surgery.

Radiographic Cobb Angle: A Feature of Congenital Lumbar Spine Stenosis

PURPOSE

A low cost, reproducible radiographic method of diagnosing congenital lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS) is lacking. We hypothesized that the Cobb angle for lumbar lordosis would be smaller in patients with CLSS, based on observations in our spine clinic patient population. Here, we compared lumbar lordosis Cobb angles with the radiographic ratio method in patients with normal spine imaging, degenerative spinal stenosis, and with CLSS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Orthopedic surgeons categorized patients with low back pain as "Normal," "Degenerative spinal stenosis," and "CLSS" based on clinical presentation and findings on lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. We included 30 patients from each cohort who had undergone lateral lumbar spine radiographs and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. For each lateral radiograph, 2 measurement methods were used (1) 4-line lumbosacral Cobb angle between L2-S1 and (2) the ratio of the anteroposterior vertebral body diameter and spinal canal anteroposterior diameter at the L3 level. We performed logistic regression analyses of CLSS prediction by Cobb angle vs the ratio method in all three cohorts. Covariates included age, gender, and body mass index.

RESULTS

The radiographic Cobb angles were smaller in CLSS patients when compared to the degenerative disease and normal cohorts: a smaller radiographic Cobb angle showed higher odds ratio (OR) of predicting CLSS diagnosis compared to the radiographic ratio when compared with degenerative disease (OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11-0.78, P = 0.01) and when compared with the normal cohort (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.92, P = 0.03). Radiographic ratio measurements showed no difference between the three cohorts (P = 0.12). CLSS was associated with male gender (P = 0.04), younger age (P = 0.01), and higher body mass index (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The radiographic Cobb angle method for lumbar lordosis may be useful for raising the possibility of CLSS as the diagnosis.

Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: an MRI-based multivariate analysis of findings in 709 patients throughout the 16- to 82-year age spectrum

OBJECTIVEUsing an imaging-based prospective comparative study of 709 eligible patients that was designed to assess lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in the ages between 16 and 82 years, the authors aimed to determine whether they could formulate radiological structural differences between the developmental and degenerative types of LSS.METHODSMRI structural changes were prospectively reviewed from 2 age cohorts of patients: those who presented clinically before the age of 60 years and those who presented at 60 years or older. Categorical degeneration variables at L1-S1 segments were compared. A multivariate comparative analysis of global radiographic degenerative variables and spinal dimensions was conducted in both cohorts. The age at presentation was correlated as a covariable.RESULTSA multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant between-groups differences in spinal canal dimensions and stenosis grades in any segments after age was adjusted for. There were no significant variances between the 2 cohorts in global degenerative variables, except at the L4-5 and L5-S1 segments, but with only small effect sizes. Age-related degeneration was found in the upper lumbar segments (L1-4) more than the lower lumbar segments (L4-S1). These findings challenge the notion that stenosis at L4-5 and L5-S1 is mainly associated with degenerative LSS.CONCLUSIONSIntegration of all the morphometric and qualitative characteristics of the 2 LSS cohorts provides evidence for a developmental background for LSS. Based on these findings the authors propose the concept of LSS as a developmental syndrome with superimposed degenerative changes. Further studies can be conducted to clarify the clinical definition of LSS and appropriate management approaches.

Etiology of developmental spinal stenosis: A genome-wide association study

Our study aimed to identify possible single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) via a genome-wide association study (GWAS) approach and a candidate gene platform that were associated with lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS). Southern Chinese population-based study volunteers were assessed (age range: 18-55 years). DSS was defined as the anteroposterior bony spinal canal diameter on T1-weighted axial MRI of L1 to S1. Genotyping was performed using the Illumina HumanOmniZhongHua-8 BeadChip. Using the canal diameter as the quantitative trait, genomic statistical analyses was performed. A total of 469 subjects were recruited. The mean axial AP measurements noted were: L1: 21.8 mm, L2: 21.9 mm, L3: 22.4 mm, L4: 20.2 mm, L5: 19.6 mm, and S1: 17.3 mm. Q-Q plots of genome-wide associations found significant differences in L4 and L5 measurements. More significant SNPs were found on chromosomes 8, 11, and 18. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 on chromosome 11 was found to be an important functional gene in canal bony development via candidate gene approach. We found two clusters in the findings with one including the upper levels (L1-L4) and the other the lower levels (L5 and S1). This is the first GWAS addressing DSS. The presence of multiple SNPs suggests a multi-factorial origin of DSS. Further analyses noted region-specific genetic predisposition, delineating distinct upper to lower lumbar regions of DSS. With better understanding of the DSS phenotype and genetic markers, the at-risk population can be identified early, preventative measures can be initiated, lifestyle/activity modification can be implemented, and more novel and precision-based therapeutics can be developed. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1262-1268, 2018.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: symptoms, diagnosis and treatment (meta-analysis of literature data)

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a disease in which degenerated discs, ligamentum flavum, facet joints, while aging, lead to a narrowing of the space around the neurovascular structures of the spine. This article presents a meta-analysis of literature data on epidemiology, causes, pathogenesis, diagnosis and various types of treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Lumbar spinal canal MRI diameter is smaller in herniated disc cauda equina syndrome patients

Introduction

Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical features in cauda equina syndrome (CES) is unknown; nor is known whether there are differences in MRI spinal canal size between lumbar herniated disc patients with CES versus lumbar herniated discs patients without CES, operated for sciatica. The aims of this study are 1) evaluating the association of MRI features with clinical presentation and outcome of CES and 2) comparing lumbar spinal canal diameters of lumbar herniated disc patients with CES versus lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated because of sciatica.

Methods

MRIs of CES patients were assessed for the following features: level of disc lesion, type (uni- or bilateral) and severity of caudal compression. Pre- and postoperative clinical features (micturition dysfunction, defecation dysfunction, altered sensation of the saddle area) were retrieved from the medical files. In addition, anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spinal canal diameters of CES patients were measured at MRI. AP diameters of lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica, were measured for comparison.

Results

48 CES patients were included. At MRI, bilateral compression was seen in 82%; complete caudal compression in 29%. MRI features were not associated with clinical presentation nor outcome. AP diameter was measured for 26 CES patients and for 31 lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica. Comparison displayed a significant smaller AP diameter of the lumbar spinal canal in CES patients (largest p = 0.002). Compared to average diameters in literature, diameters of CES patients were significantly more often below average than that of the sciatica patients (largest p = 0.021).

Conclusion

This is the first study demonstrating differences in lumbar spinal canal size between lumbar herniated disc patients with CES and lumbar herniated disc patients without CES, operated for sciatica. This finding might imply that lumbar herniated disc patients with a relative small lumbar spinal canal might need to be approached differently in managing complaints of herniated disc. Since the number of studied patients is relatively small, further research should be conducted before clinical consequences are considered.

Radiographic indices for lumbar developmental spinal stenosis

Background

Patients with developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) are susceptible to developing symptomatic stenosis due to pre-existing narrowed spinal canals. DSS has been previously defined by MRI via the axial anteroposterior (AP) bony spinal canal diameter. However, MRI is hardly a cost-efficient tool for screening patients. X-rays are superior due to its availability and cost, but currently, there is no definition of DSS based on plain radiographs. Thus, the aim of this study is to develop radiographic indices for diagnosing DSS.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort of 148 subjects consisting of patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (patient group) and asymptomatic subjects recruited openly from the general population (control group). Ethics approval was obtained from the local institutional review board. All subjects underwent MRI for diagnosing DSS and radiographs for measuring parameters used for creating the indices. All measurements were performed by two independent investigators, blinded to patient details. Intra- and interobserver reliability analyses were conducted, and only parameters with near perfect intraclass correlation underwent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the cutoff values for diagnosing DSS using radiographs.

Results

Imaging parameters from a total of 66 subjects from the patient group and 82 asymptomatic subjects in the control group were used for analysis. ROC analysis suggested sagittal vertebral body width to pedicle width ratio (SBW:PW) as having the strongest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing DSS. Cutoff indices for SBW:PW were level-specific: L1 (2.0), L2 (2.0), L3 (2.2), L4 (2.2), L5 (2.5), and S1 (2.8).

Conclusions

This is the first study to define DSS on plain radiographs based on comparisons between a clinically relevant patient group and a control group. Individuals with DSS can be identified by a simple radiograph using a screening tool allowing for better cost-saving means for clinical diagnosis or research purposes.

PARAMETERS OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN PATIENTS WITH CONGENITAL NARROWING OF THE LUMBAR SPINAL CANAL

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the morphological parameters of magnetic resonance in patients with congenital narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal with patients with low back pain. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective, observational study was conducted with measurements in the axial and sagittal magnetic resonance sections of the vertebral body and canal of the lumbar spine of 64 patients with diagnosis of low back pain, which were compared with resonance images taken from 31 Mexican patients with congenital narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal. Results: The results show that patients with congenital narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal in the axial sections have a difference in diameters, being L2<13.9 mm, L3<13.3 mm, L4<12.9 mm, L5<13.1 mm, compared with controls L2<20.5 mm, L3<20.5 mm, L4<19.3 mm, L5<18.1 mm with p = 0.000. Conclusions: We found different measurements in the Mexican population compared to those found by similar studies. With the parameters obtained, it would be possible to make the proper diagnosis, surgical planning, and treatment.

More Than 20 Years Follow-up After En Bloc Cervical Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and to clarify the potential risks of cervical laminoplasty by a long-term follow-up of more than 20 years.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is no follow-up report exceeding 20 years after cervical laminoplasty.

METHODS

Two hundred sixteen patients underwent en bloc cervical laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament between 1981 and 1994. Of these, 148 patients with a follow-up of more than 20 years were retrospectively studied (68 survived patients and 80 dead patients). The neurological evaluation was graded using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the recovery rate. Neurological recovery was defined by the increase in JOA score. Radiological examinations were carried out using pre- and postoperative radiographs. As for the dead patients, the cause and age of death were reviewed.

RESULTS

The JOA score and recovery rate increased to 14.2 ± 2.7% and 64.9 ± 28.6%, respectively, at 5 years. The JOA score and recovery rate were maintained at 13.9 ± 3.2% and 61.6 ± 34.6% at 10 years. The JOA score decreased to 11.4 ± 5.1 at the last follow-up. In 32 out of 65 patients (49.2%), the JOA scores worsened mainly due to other spinal lesions. Cervical alignment became kyphotic when comparing preoperatively and at the last follow-up (ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: 15.7 ± 12.2° and 6.9 ± 17.8°, cervical spondylosis: 11.0 ± 8.9° and 3.3 ± 9.4°). Range of motion (ROM) decreased and one of the causes of ROM reduction was interlaminar fusion. The mean age at death was 78.2 years. The most frequent cause of death was malignant tumor.

CONCLUSION

Spine surgeons must be aware that patients have a long postoperative lifetime when cervical laminoplasty is performed. A long postoperative follow-up should be carried out after laminoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The paradoxical relationship between ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and developmental lumbar spinal stenosis

Background

Ligamentum flavum (LF) hypertrophy is a common cause of lumbar spinal stenosis and is thought to be degeneration-driven. Developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) is characterized by pre-existing narrowed spinal canals and is likely a developmental problem that occurs in childhood. In these cases, the LF may demonstrate different characteristics as compared to degeneration-driven stenosis. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between histological changes of LF and canal size.

Methods

Patients who had surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis were prospectively recruited and divided into three groups (critical DSS, relative DSS and non-DSS) based on previously defined anteroposterior bony spinal canal diameter measurements on MRI. The degree of disc degeneration and LF thickness were also measured from L1 to S1. Surgical LF specimens were retrieved for histological assessment of fibrotic grade and area of fibrosis.

Results

A total of 19 females and 15 males (110 LF specimens) with an overall mean age of 65.9 years (SD ± 9.8 years) were recruited. DSS was found to have a significant negative correlation (p < 0.001) with LF thickness, its fibrotic grade and area of fibrosis (%). Non-DSS exhibited a significant positive relationship with the degree of LF fibrosis. Disc degeneration and LF thickness had no correlation with LF histology.

Conclusions

Our study is the first to definitively note that degeneration is the cause of LF fibrosis in non-DSS patients; however, in contrast, an inverse relationship exists between canal size and LF fibrosis in DSS patients, suggesting a different pathomechanism. Hence, despite a similar degree of LF thickness, DSS patients have LF with less fibrosis compared with non-DSS patients. Further investigation of the cause of LF changes in DSS is necessary to understand this relationship.

Management of lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects more than 200,000 adults in the United States, resulting in substantial pain and disability. It is the most common reason for spinal surgery in patients over 65 years. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a clinical syndrome of pain in the buttocks or lower extremities, with or without back pain. It is associated with reduced space available for the neural and vascular elements of the lumbar spine. The condition is often exacerbated by standing, walking, or lumbar extension and relieved by forward flexion, sitting, or recumbency. Clinical care and research into lumbar spinal stenosis is complicated by the heterogeneity of the condition, the lack of standard criteria for diagnosis and inclusion in studies, and high rates of anatomic stenosis on imaging studies in older people who are completely asymptomatic. The options for non-surgical management include drugs, physiotherapy, spinal injections, lifestyle modification, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. However, few high quality randomized trials have looked at conservative management. A systematic review concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific type of non-surgical treatment. Several different surgical procedures are used to treat patients who do not improve with non-operative therapies. Given that rapid deterioration is rare and that symptoms often wax and wane or gradually improve, surgery is almost always elective and considered only if sufficiently bothersome symptoms persist despite trials of less invasive interventions. Outcomes (leg pain and disability) seem to be better for surgery than for non-operative treatment, but the evidence is heterogeneous and often of limited quality.