1
|
Chen Y, Nelson AM, Cohen SP. Chronic pain for rheumatological disorders: Pathophysiology, therapeutics and evidence. Joint Bone Spine 2024; 91:105750. [PMID: 38857874 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
Pain is the leading reason people seek orthopedic and rheumatological care. By definition, most pain can be classified as nociceptive, or pain resulting from non-neural tissue injury or potential injury, with between 15% and 50% of individuals suffering from concomitant neuropathic pain or the newest category of pain, nociplastic pain, defined as "pain arising from altered nociception despite no clear evidence of actual or threatened tissue damage, or of a disease or lesion affecting the somatosensory system." Pain classification is important because it affects treatment decisions at all levels of care. Although several instruments can assist with classifying treatment, physician designation is the reference standard. The appropriate treatment of pain should ideally involve multidisciplinary care including physical therapy, psychotherapy and integrative therapies when appropriate, and pharmacotherapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute, mechanical pain, membrane stabilizers for neuropathic and nociplastic pain, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants for all types of pain. For nonsurgical interventions, there is evidence to support a small effect for epidural steroid injections for an intermediate-term duration, and conflicting evidence for radiofrequency ablation to provide at least 6months of benefit for facet joint pain, knee osteoarthritis, and sacroiliac joint pain. Since pain and disability represent the top reason for elective surgery, it should be reserved for patients who fail conservative interventions. Risk factors for procedural failure are the same as risk factors for conservative treatment failure and include greater disease burden, psychopathology, opioid use, central sensitization and multiple comorbid pain conditions, poorly controlled preoperative and postoperative pain, and secondary gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ariana M Nelson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Departments of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services, University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD,USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Etebari C, Yanamala S, Dubin J. A Case Report of U-Type Sacral Fracture After Chiropractic Adjustment. JBJS Case Connect 2023; 13:01709767-202312000-00036. [PMID: 38011312 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.23.00387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
CASE A U-type sacral fracture, or spinopelvic dissociation, resulting from chiropractic manipulation has not been described in the medical literature. This report presents the case of a 74-year-old male patient who sustained a U-type sacral fracture after drop-table chiropractic manipulation. CONCLUSION Our case demonstrates that chiropractic manipulative therapy involving the commonly used drop-table can cause severe injury. The patient's course was complicated by a delay in diagnosis and a prolonged hospital stay. Orthopaedic surgeons should have a high degree of suspicion for spinopelvic dissociation in the setting of bilateral sacral fractures. One year after injury, with conservative management, the patient returned to baseline function with mild residual neuropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Etebari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Health Truman Medical Center Hospital Hill, Kansas City, Missouri
- University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Sandeep Yanamala
- University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Jonathan Dubin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Health Truman Medical Center Hospital Hill, Kansas City, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chu ECP, Trager RJ, Lee LYK, Niazi IK. A retrospective analysis of the incidence of severe adverse events among recipients of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy. Sci Rep 2023; 13:1254. [PMID: 36690712 PMCID: PMC9870863 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28520-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
This study examined the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) of patients receiving chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), with the hypothesis that < 1 per 100,000 SMT sessions results in a grade ≥ 3 (severe) AE. A secondary objective was to examine independent predictors of grade ≥ 3 AEs. We identified patients with SMT-related AEs from January 2017 through August 2022 across 30 chiropractic clinics in Hong Kong. AE data were extracted from a complaint log, including solicited patient surveys, complaints, and clinician reports, and corroborated by medical records. AEs were independently graded 1-5 based on severity (1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe, 4-life-threatening, 5-death). Among 960,140 SMT sessions for 54,846 patients, 39 AEs were identified, two were grade 3, both of which were rib fractures occurring in women age > 60 with osteoporosis, while none were grade ≥ 4, yielding an incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs of 0.21 per 100,000 SMT sessions (95% CI 0.00, 0.56 per 100,000). There were no AEs related to stroke or cauda equina syndrome. The sample size was insufficient to identify predictors of grade ≥ 3 AEs using multiple logistic regression. In this study, severe SMT-related AEs were reassuringly very rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Chun-Pu Chu
- New York Chiropractic and Physiotherapy Centre, EC Healthcare, 41/F Langham Place Office Tower, 8 Argyle Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Robert J Trager
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
- College of Chiropractic, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.
| | - Linda Yin-King Lee
- School of Nursing and Health Studies, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Imran Khan Niazi
- Centre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, 1060, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tominaga Y, Hirayama I, Nonaka M, Yano T, Ishii M. Commercial massage tool-induced spinal epidural hematoma. Acute Med Surg 2023; 10:e886. [PMID: 37664087 PMCID: PMC10468583 DOI: 10.1002/ams2.886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Spinal epidural hematoma (SEH), which may develop into an emergency condition, is a rare disease. Here, we present the case of a patient with SEH caused by cervical massage using a commercial massage tool. Case Presentation A 75-year-old man was brought to our hospital with a chief complaint of posterior neck pain during sleep. He had used a commercial massage tool before going to bed. Upon arrival, hypotension and respiratory failure were observed. His muscle strength in both the upper and lower extremities rated 0 on the manual muscle test, and sensory loss below the papillae was observed. His symptoms resolved spontaneously after 2 h. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested a spinal cord epidural hematoma at the C2/C3 to C3/C4 level. On day 6, the patient was discharged without any impairment. Conclusion Fatal complications could occur by cervical massage using a commercial massage tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiteru Tominaga
- Department of Emergency MedicineNational Hospital Organization Saitama HospitalSaitamaJapan
| | - Ichiro Hirayama
- Department of Emergency MedicineNational Hospital Organization Saitama HospitalSaitamaJapan
| | - Minaho Nonaka
- Department of Emergency MedicineNational Hospital Organization Saitama HospitalSaitamaJapan
| | - Tetsuhiro Yano
- Department of Emergency MedicineNational Hospital Organization Saitama HospitalSaitamaJapan
| | - Mitsuru Ishii
- Department of Emergency MedicineNational Hospital Organization Saitama HospitalSaitamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Association Between Psychosocial Parameters and Response to Chiropractic Care Among Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2022; 44:675-682. [PMID: 35753883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether baseline self-efficacy, fear of pain with movement (kinesiophobia), or change in either were associated with clinically important improvement in disability among older adults with chronic low back pain after 12 weeks of chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) and exercise. METHODS This secondary analysis used randomized trial data from community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older with chronic spinal disability who received non-pharmacological treatment of CSM and exercise. Those with ≥30% reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after 12 weeks of treatment were considered responders to care. Psychosocial measures included the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Logistic regression-assessed associations were between psychosocial, demographic, and low back predictors and 30% ODI improvement. RESULTS There were 176 community-dwelling older adults included in this analysis. Mean age was 71 years, 59.7% were women; 176 (96.7%) had complete data. Baseline disability (ODI = 26.1 ± 9.3) and back pain (5.0 ± 1.9, 0-10 scale) were moderate. Baseline PSEQ reflected higher self-efficacy (47.7 ± 7.8, 0-60 scale) with minimal kinesiophobia (TSK 34.3 ± 5.2, 17-68 scale). Seventy-two (40.9%) achieved 30% reduction in ODI (mean -5.4 ± 7.9) after 12 weeks of treatment. Mean self-efficacy improvement was clinically important (2.5 ± 6.5 points); kinesiophobia (-2.7 ± 4.4 points) and LBP (-1.6 points) also improved. Baseline PSEQ and percent improvement in PSEQ and TSK were associated with response to treatment in univariate regression analyses but not in multiple regression models that included low back predictors. LBP duration >4 years negatively impacted recovery. CONCLUSIONS Among this sample of older adults who received chiropractic manipulation and exercise, baseline self-efficacy and improvements in self-efficacy and kinesiophobia were individually associated with clinically important reductions in disability post-intervention, although not in adjusted models when LBP duration was included.
Collapse
|
6
|
Whedon JM, Kizhakkeveettil A, Toler AWJ, Bezdjian S, Rossi D, Uptmor S, MacKenzie TA, Lurie JD, Hurwitz EL, Coulter I, Haldeman S. Initial Choice of Spinal Manipulation Reduces Escalation of Care for Chronic Low Back Pain Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:E142-E148. [PMID: 34474443 PMCID: PMC8581066 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN We combined elements of cohort and crossover-cohort design. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare longterm outcomes for spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and opioid analgesic therapy (OAT) regarding escalation of care for patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Current evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of cLBP include both OAT and SMT. For long-term care of older adults, the efficiency and value of continuing either OAT or SMT are uncertain. METHODS We examined Medicare claims data spanning a five-year period. We included older Medicare beneficiaries with an episode of cLBP beginning in 2013. All patients were continuously enrolled under Medicare Parts A, B, and D. We analyzed the cumulative frequency of encounters indicative of an escalation of care for cLBP, including hospitalizations, emergency department visits, advanced diagnostic imaging, specialist visits, lumbosacral surgery, interventional pain medicine techniques, and encounters for potential complications of cLBP. RESULTS SMT was associated with lower rates of escalation of care as compared to OAT. The adjusted rate of escalated care encounters was approximately 2.5 times higher for initial choice of OAT vs. initial choice of SMT (with weighted propensity scoring: rate ratio 2.67, 95% confidence interval 2.64-2.69, P < .0001). CONCLUSION Among older Medicare beneficiaries who initiated long-term care for cLBP with opioid analgesic therapy, the adjusted rate of escalated care encounters was significantly higher as compared to those who initiated care with spinal manipulative therapy.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Whedon
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | | | - Andrew WJ Toler
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | - Serena Bezdjian
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Rossi
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Uptmor
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | | | - Jon D Lurie
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Eric L. Hurwitz
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | - Ian Coulter
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| | - Scott Haldeman
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Whedon JM, Kizhakkeveettil A, Toler A, MacKenzie TA, Lurie JD, Bezdjian S, Haldeman S, Hurwitz E, Coulter I. Long-Term Medicare Costs Associated With Opioid Analgesic Therapy vs Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain in a Cohort of Older Adults. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2021; 44:519-526. [PMID: 34876298 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare Medicare healthcare expenditures for patients who received long-term treatment of chronic low back pain (cLBP) with either opioid analgesic therapy (OAT) or spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study using a cohort design for analysis of Medicare claims data. The study population included Medicare beneficiaries enrolled under Medicare Parts A, B, and D from 2012 through 2016. We assembled cohorts of patients who received long-term management of cLBP with OAT or SMT (such as delivered by chiropractic or osteopathic practitioners) and evaluated the comparative effect of OAT vs SMT upon expenditures, using multivariable regression to control for beneficiary characteristics and measures of health status, and propensity score weighting and binning to account for selection bias. RESULTS The study sample totaled 28,160 participants, of whom 77% initiated long-term care of cLBP with OAT, and 23% initiated care with SMT. For care of low back pain specifically, average long-term costs for patients who initiated care with OAT were 58% lower than those who initiated care with SMT. However, overall long-term healthcare expenditures under Medicare were 1.87 times higher for patients who initiated care via OAT compared with those initiated care with SMT (95% CI 1.65-2.11; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Adults aged 65 to 84 who initiated long-term treatment for cLBP via OAT incurred lower long-term costs for low back pain but higher long-term total healthcare costs under Medicare compared with patients who initiated long-term treatment with SMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Whedon
- Health Services Research, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California.
| | - Anupama Kizhakkeveettil
- Eastern Medicine Department, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California
| | - Andrew Toler
- Eastern Medicine Department, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California
| | - Todd A MacKenzie
- The Dartmouth Institute, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Jon D Lurie
- The Dartmouth Institute, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Serena Bezdjian
- Health Services Research, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California
| | - Scott Haldeman
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California
| | - Eric Hurwitz
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California
| | - Ian Coulter
- Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu H, Zhang T, Qu T, Yang CW, Li SK. Spinal epidural hematoma after spinal manipulation therapy: Report of three cases and a literature review. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:6501-6509. [PMID: 34435018 PMCID: PMC8362556 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i22.6501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) has been widely used worldwide to treat musculoskeletal diseases, but it can cause serious adverse events. Spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) caused by SMT is a rare emergency that can cause neurological dysfunction. We herein report three cases of SEH after SMT.
CASE SUMMARY The first case was a 30-year-old woman who experienced neck pain and numbness in both upper limbs immediately after SMT. Her symptoms persisted after 3 d of conservative treatment, and she was admitted to our hospital. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated an SEH, extending from C6 to C7. The second case was a 55-year-old man with sudden back pain 1 d after SMT, numbness in both lower limbs, an inability to stand or walk, and difficulty urinating. MRI revealed an SEH, extending from T1 to T3. The third case was a 28-year-old man who suddenly developed symptoms of numbness in both lower limbs 4 h after SMT. He was unable to stand or walk and experienced mild back pain. MRI revealed an SEH, extending from T1 to T2. All three patients underwent surgery after failed conservative treatment. The three cases recovered to ASIA grade E on day 5, 1 wk, and day 10 after surgery, respectively. All patients returned to normal after 3 mo of follow-up.
CONCLUSION SEH caused by SMT is very rare, and the condition of each patient should be evaluated in full detail before operation. SEH should be diagnosed immediately and actively treated by surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Tao Qu
- Department of Spine Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Cheng-Wei Yang
- Department of Spine Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| | - Song-Kai Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, The 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fenton JJ, Jerant A, Franks P, Gosdin M, Fridman I, Cipri C, Weinberg G, Hudnut A, Tancredi DJ. Watchful waiting as a strategy to reduce low-value spinal imaging: study protocol for a randomized trial. Trials 2021; 22:167. [PMID: 33639993 PMCID: PMC7910785 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05106-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with acute low back pain frequently request diagnostic imaging, and clinicians feel pressure to acquiesce to such requests to sustain patient trust and satisfaction. Spinal imaging in patients with acute low back pain poses risks from diagnostic evaluation of false-positive findings, patient labeling and anxiety, and unnecessary treatment (including spinal surgery). Watchful waiting advice has been an effective strategy to reduce some low-value treatments, and some evidence suggests a watchful waiting approach would be acceptable to many patients requesting diagnostic tests. Methods We will use key informant interviews of clinicians and focus groups with primary care patients to refine a theory-informed standardized patient-based intervention designed to teach clinicians how to advise watchful waiting when patients request low-value spinal imaging for low back pain. We will test the effectiveness of the intervention in a randomized clinical trial. We will recruit 8–10 primary care and urgent care clinics (~ 55 clinicians) in Sacramento, CA; clinicians will be randomized 1:1 to intervention and control groups. Over a 3- to 6-month period, clinicians in the intervention group will receive 3 visits with standardized patient instructors (SPIs) portraying patients with acute back pain; SPIs will instruct clinicians in a three-step model emphasizing establishing trust, empathic communication, and negotiation of a watchful waiting approach. Control physicians will receive no intervention. The primary outcome is the post-intervention rate of spinal imaging among actual patients with acute back pain seen by the clinicians adjusted for rate of imaging during a baseline period. Secondary outcomes are use of targeted communication techniques during a follow-up visit with an SP, clinician self-reported use of watchful waiting with actual low back pain patients, post-intervention rates of diagnostic imaging for other musculoskeletal pain syndromes (to test for generalization of intervention effects beyond back pain), and patient trust and satisfaction with physicians. Discussion This trial will determine whether standardized patient instructors can help clinicians develop skill in negotiating a watchful waiting approach with patients with acute low back pain, thereby reducing rates of low-value spinal imaging. The trial will also examine the possibility that intervention effects generalize to other diagnostic tests. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT 04255199. Registered on January 20, 2020
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Fenton
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA. .,Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.
| | - Anthony Jerant
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.,Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| | - Peter Franks
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.,Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| | - Melissa Gosdin
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| | - Ilona Fridman
- Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Camille Cipri
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| | - Gary Weinberg
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| | - Andrew Hudnut
- Sutter Institute for Medical Research, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Daniel J Tancredi
- Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Davis, Davis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leach RA. Full-Coverage Chiropractic in Medicare: A Proposal to Eliminate Inequities, Improve Outcomes, and Reduce Health Disparities Without Increasing Overall Program Costs. JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC HUMANITIES 2020; 27:29-36. [PMID: 33324134 PMCID: PMC7729103 DOI: 10.1016/j.echu.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to discuss evidence that supports the resolution of inequities for Medicare beneficiaries who receive chiropractic care. DISCUSSION Medicare covers necessary examinations, imaging, exercise instruction, and treatments for beneficiaries with back pain when provided by medical doctors, osteopaths, and their associated support staff such as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and physical therapists. However, if the same patient with back pain presents to a chiropractor, then the only service that is covered by Medicare is manipulation of the spine. Current evidence does not support this inequity in Medicare beneficiary service coverage. There is no evidence to show an increase in serious risks associated with chiropractic treatment of neck or back pain in Medicare beneficiaries. Chiropractors support national public health goals and endorse safe, evidence-based practices. Chiropractic care for Medicare beneficiaries has been associated with enhanced clinical outcomes such as faster recovery, fewer back surgeries a year later, reduced opioid-associated disability, fewer traumatic injuries and falls, and slower declines in activities of daily living and disability over time. Further evidence points to lower costs, fewer medical physician visits for low back pain, less opioid-related expense, and less back-surgery expense with chiropractic utilization. Use is lower among vulnerable populations: seniors, lower income women, and black and Hispanic beneficiaries who may be most affected by current inequities associated with the limited coverage. In this era of evidence-based and patient-centered care, beneficiaries who receive chiropractic care are very satisfied with the care they receive. CONCLUSION The current evidence suggests a need for change in US policy toward chiropractic in Medicare and support for HR 3654. Ending inequities by providing patients full coverage for chiropractic services has the potential to enhance care outcomes and reduce health disparities without increasing program costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A. Leach
- Corresponding author: Robert A. Leach, DC, MS, Food Science, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, 214 Russell Street, Starkville, MS 39759
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Regauer V, Seckler E, Müller M, Bauer P. Physical therapy interventions for older people with vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders addressing mobility and participation: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:494. [PMID: 33228601 PMCID: PMC7684969 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01899-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders (VDB) are among the most relevant contributors to the burden of disability among older adults living in the community and associated with immobility, limitations of activities of daily living and decreased participation. The aim of this study was to identify the quality of evidence of physical therapy interventions that address mobility and participation in older patients with VDB and to characterize the used primary and secondary outcomes. METHODS A systematic search via MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PEDro, forward citation tracing and hand search was conducted initially in 11/2017 and updated in 7/2019. We included individual and cluster-randomized controlled trials and trials with quasi-experimental design, published between 2007 and 2017/2019 and including individuals ≥65 years with VDB. Physical therapy and related interventions were reviewed with no restrictions to outcome measurement. Screening of titles, abstracts and full texts, data extraction and critical appraisal was conducted by two independent researchers. The included studies were heterogeneous in terms of interventions and outcome measures. Therefore, a narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS A total of 20 randomized and 2 non-randomized controlled trials with 1876 patients met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were heterogeneous in terms of complexity of interventions, outcome measures and methodological quality. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) was examined in twelve studies, computer-assisted VR (CAVR) in five, Tai Chi as VR (TCVR) in three, canal repositioning manoeuvres (CRM) in one and manual therapy (MT) in one study. Mixed effects were found regarding body structure/function and activities/participation. Quality of life and/or falls were assessed, with no differences between groups. VR is with moderate quality of evidence superior to usual care to improve balance, mobility and symptoms. CONCLUSION To treat older individuals with VDB, VR in any variation and in addition to CRMs seems to be effective. High-quality randomized trials need to be conducted to inform clinical decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2017 CRD42017080291 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Regauer
- Centre for Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024, Rosenheim, Germany.
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistraße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Eva Seckler
- Centre for Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024, Rosenheim, Germany
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Marchioninistraße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Müller
- Faculty for Applied Health and Social Sciences and Centre for Research, Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024, Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Petra Bauer
- Faculty for Applied Health and Social Sciences and Centre for Research, Research, Development and Technology Transfer, Rosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences, Hochschulstraße 1, 83024, Rosenheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ayoubi R, Nassour N, Saidy E, Aouad D, Maalouly J, Daou E. Physical Manipulation-Induced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Case Report. CASE REPORTS IN ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.1159/000509704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Manipulative treatments for pain are very widely used nowadays by a variety of physicians. These treatment modalities are generally safe, but various studies have reported serious complications. This report presents the case of a 78-year-old male patient with a history of Parkinson’s disease, who was diagnosed with a right hip fracture that occurred as a result of physical manipulative treatment. He underwent a cemented hemi-arthroplasty as appropriate surgical treatment of his condition. Manipulative treatments can result in minor and major complications ranging from simple sprains and rib fractures to cerebrovascular accidents and death. The frequency of these events seems to be rare; however, no robust studies are present and further investigations are urgently needed. Hip fractures as a result of this treatment have not been previously mentioned. This is the first reported case in the literature of a hip fracture resulting from manipulative treatment. Primary care physicians and orthopedists should be aware of the possibility of this outcome and rule it out whenever necessary.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hawk C, Whalen W, Farabaugh RJ, Daniels CJ, Minkalis AL, Taylor DN, Anderson D, Anderson K, Crivelli LS, Cark M, Barlow E, Paris D, Sarnat R, Weeks J. Best Practices for Chiropractic Management of Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline. J Altern Complement Med 2020; 26:884-901. [PMID: 32749874 PMCID: PMC7578188 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) through a broad-based consensus process on best practices for chiropractic management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Design: CPG based on evidence-based recommendations of a panel of experts in chronic MSK pain management. Methods: Using systematic reviews identified in an initial literature search, a steering committee of experts in research and management of patients with chronic MSK pain drafted a set of recommendations. Additional supportive literature was identified to supplement gaps in the evidence base. A multidisciplinary panel of experienced practitioners and educators rated the recommendations through a formal Delphi consensus process using the RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles, methodology. Results: The Delphi process was conducted January-February 2020. The 62-member Delphi panel reached consensus on chiropractic management of five common chronic MSK pain conditions: low-back pain (LBP), neck pain, tension headache, osteoarthritis (knee and hip), and fibromyalgia. Recommendations were made for nonpharmacological treatments, including acupuncture, spinal manipulation/mobilization, and other manual therapy; modalities such as low-level laser and interferential current; exercise, including yoga; mind-body interventions, including mindfulness meditation and cognitive behavior therapy; and lifestyle modifications such as diet and tobacco cessation. Recommendations covered many aspects of the clinical encounter, from informed consent through diagnosis, assessment, treatment planning and implementation, and concurrent management and referral. Appropriate referral and comanagement were emphasized. Conclusions: These evidence-based recommendations for a variety of conservative treatment approaches to the management of common chronic MSK pain conditions may advance consistency of care, foster collaboration between provider groups, and thereby improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Hawk
- Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Paris
- VA Northern CA Health Care System, Redding, CA, USA
| | - Richard Sarnat
- Advanced Medicine Integration Group, L.P., Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hinkeldey N, Okamoto C, Khan J. Spinal Manipulation and Select Manual Therapies: Current Perspectives. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2020; 31:593-608. [PMID: 32981581 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Touch is fundamental to the doctor-patient relationship. Touch can produce neuromodulatory effects that mitigate pain and put patients at ease. Touch begins with a confident handshake and continues throughout the physical examination. Touching patients where they hurt is a clear indication that a provider understands their complaint. Touch often continues as a function of treatment. This article updates evidence surrounding human touch and addresses mechanisms of action for manual therapy, the impact of manual therapy on pain management, health care conditions for which manual therapy may be beneficial, treatment plans with dose-response evidence, and the impact of manual therapy on the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Hinkeldey
- VA Central Iowa Health Care System, 3600 30th Street, Des Moines, IA 50310, USA; Palmer College of Chiropractic, 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803, USA.
| | - Casey Okamoto
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 500 Boynton Health Service Bridge, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Jamal Khan
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 500 Boynton Health Service Bridge, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee TL, Sherman KJ, Hawkes RJ, Phelan EA, Turner JA. The Benefits of T'ai Chi for Older Adults with Chronic Back Pain: A Qualitative Study. J Altern Complement Med 2020; 26:456-462. [PMID: 32379976 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2019.0455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To determine the perceived benefits of t'ai chi in older adults with chronic low-back pain (cLBP). Design: A qualitative analysis from a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Subjects: Eighteen participants (65+ years old) with cLBP of at least moderate intensity. Intervention: A 36-week intervention beginning with twice weekly classes for 12 weeks, weekly classes for 6 weeks, biweekly classes for 6 weeks, and monthly classes for 12 weeks. Participants were asked to practice at home on nonclass days and videos were provided to assist in that process. Outcome Measures: Participants in the focus groups were asked to provide feedback on their experiences with the study as well as the benefits of their t'ai chi practice. We used demographic and class attendance data to describe the sample. Results: Regarding the benefits of t'ai chi practice, five major themes were identified: functional benefits, pain reduction/pain relief, psychospiritual benefits, the importance of social support in learning t'ai chi, and the integration of t'ai chi into daily activities. The most common functional benefits were improvements in balance, flexibility, leg strength, and posture. Some reported pain reduction or pain relief, but others did not. Increased relaxation, mindfulness, and a sense of connectedness were subthemes that emerged from psychospiritual benefits. Social support benefits included motivation to attend class and group support while learning a new skill. Finally, improved body awareness allowed participants to integrate t'ai chi skills into their daily activities. Conclusions: This qualitative analysis demonstrates the multifaceted benefits of t'ai chi for older adults living with cLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamsin L Lee
- Department of Child, Family and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen J Sherman
- Kaiser Permanente WA Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rene J Hawkes
- Kaiser Permanente WA Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Phelan
- Department of Medicine and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Judith A Turner
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sherman KJ, Wellman RD, Hawkes RJ, Phelan EA, Lee T, Turner JA. T'ai Chi for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adults: A Feasibility Trial. J Altern Complement Med 2020; 26:176-189. [PMID: 32013530 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2019.0438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: T'ai chi (TC) has been found effective for improving chronic low back pain (cLBP). However, such studies did not include adults over 65 years of age. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of TC in this population compared with Health Education (HE) and with Usual Care (UC). Design: Feasibility randomized controlled trial. Settings/Location: Participants were recruited from Kaiser Permanente Washington and classes took place in a Kaiser facility. Patients: Adults 65 years of age and older with cLBP. Interventions: Twenty-eight participants were randomized to 12 weeks of TC followed by a 24-week tapered TC program, 12 were assigned to a 12-week HE intervention and 17 were assigned to UC only. Outcome Measures: Feasibility and acceptability were determined by recruitment, retention and 12-, 26-, and 52-week follow-up rates, instructor adherence to protocol, class attendance, TC home practice, class satisfaction, and adverse events. Results: Fifty-seven participants were enrolled in two cohorts of 28 and 29 during two 4-month recruitment periods. Questionnaire follow-up completion rates ranged between 88% and 93%. Two major class protocol deviations were noted in TC and none in HE. Sixty-two percent of TC participants versus 50% of HE participants attended at least 70% of the classes during the 12-week initial intervention period. Weekly rates of TC home practice were high among class attendees (median of 4.2 days) at 12 weeks, with fewer people practicing at 26 and 52 weeks. By 52 weeks, 70% of TC participants reported practicing the week before, with a median of 3 days per week and 15 min/session. TC participants rated the helpfulness of their classes significantly higher than did HE participants, but the groups were similarly likely to recommend the classes. Conclusion: The TC intervention is feasible in this population, while the HE group requires modifications in delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen J Sherman
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Robert D Wellman
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Rene J Hawkes
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Elizabeth A Phelan
- Department of Medicine and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Tamsin Lee
- Department of Child, Family and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Judith A Turner
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chen Q, Feng JF, Tang X, Li YL, Chen L, Chen G. Cervical epidural hematoma after spinal manipulation therapy: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:461. [PMID: 31638954 PMCID: PMC6805498 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2871-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical spinal manipulation therapy is a common non-invasive treatment for neck pain and stiffness, and has been widely used in the population. However, most people do not pay attention to the potential risks of neck manipulation, such as ligament damage, fractures, and spinal cord injuries. Epidural hematoma is a disease in which blood accumulates in the epidural space of the vertebral body. This disease is usually caused by trauma or iatrogenic surgery, and may be associated with blood coagulopathies, neoplasms, or degenerative spinal disease. Reports of epidural hematoma caused by cervical spinal manipulation are rare. CASE PRESENTATION We present the case of a patient with tetraplegia and spinal shock after neck manipulation. A physical examination of the patient on admission found tenderness in the neck and increased muscle tension in both upper limbs. The superficial sensation of the upper limb disappeared, but the deep sensation still remained. The lower extremity had 0/5 power on both sides. The sensation below the T2 level completely disappeared. A cervical magnetic resonance imaging scan showed an acute posterior epidural hematoma from the C3-T3 vertebrae. Ultimately, the patient underwent emergency hematoma removal and showed partial improvement in symptoms of paralysis during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Although spinal manipulation is simple and neck pain is common and recurrent in the general population, the basic condition and disease history of patients should be determined before manipulation. For high-risk patients, caution should be applied for cervical spinal manipulation or it should be prohibited. For a suspected hematoma, MRI should be used at an early stage to diagnose and locate the hematoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000 Sichuan Province China
| | - Jun-fei Feng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000 Sichuan Province China
| | - Xin Tang
- Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000 Guizhou Province China
| | - Yu-ling Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000 Sichuan Province China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000 Sichuan Province China
| | - Guo Chen
- Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, 610041 Sichuan China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chaibi A, Russell MB. A risk-benefit assessment strategy to exclude cervical artery dissection in spinal manual-therapy: a comprehensive review. Ann Med 2019; 51:118-127. [PMID: 30889367 PMCID: PMC7857472 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1590627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical artery dissection refers to a tear in the internal carotid or the vertebral artery that results in an intramural haematoma and/or an aneurysmal dilatation. Although cervical artery dissection is thought to occur spontaneously, physical trauma to the neck, especially hyperextension and rotation, has been reported as a trigger. Headache and/or neck pain is the most common initial symptom of cervical artery dissection. Other symptoms include Horner's syndrome and lower cranial nerve palsy. Both headache and/or neck pain are common symptoms and leading causes of disability, while cervical artery dissection is rare. Patients often consult their general practitioner for headache and/or neck pain, and because manual-therapy interventions can alleviate headache and/or neck pain, many patients seek manual therapists, such as chiropractors and physiotherapists. Cervical mobilization and manipulation are two interventions that manual therapists use. Both interventions have been suspected of being able to trigger cervical artery dissection as an adverse event. The aim of this review is to provide an updated step-by-step risk-benefit assessment strategy regarding manual therapy and to provide tools for clinicians to exclude cervical artery dissection. Key messages Cervical mobilization and/or manipulation have been suspected to be able to trigger cervical artery dissection (CAD). However, these assumptions are based on case studies which are unable to established direct causality. The concern relates to the chicken and the egg discussion, i.e. whether the CAD symptoms lead the patient to seek cervical manual-therapy or whether the cervical manual-therapy provoked CAD along with the non-CAD presenting complaint. Thus, instead of proving a nearly impossible causality hypothesis, this study provide clinicians with an updated step-by-step risk-benefit assessment strategy tool to (a) facilitate clinicians understanding of CAD, (b) appraise the risk and applicability of cervical manual-therapy, and (c) provide clinicians with adequate tools to better detect and exclude CAD in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander Chaibi
- a Head and Neck Research Group, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.,b Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo , Nordbyhagen , Norway
| | - Michael Bjørn Russell
- a Head and Neck Research Group, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.,b Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo , Nordbyhagen , Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Salsbury SA, Goertz CM, Vining RD, Hondras MA, Andresen AA, Long CR, Lyons KJ, Killinger LZ, Wallace RB. Interdisciplinary Practice Models for Older Adults With Back Pain: A Qualitative Evaluation. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2018; 58:376-387. [PMID: 28082277 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnw188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older adults seek health care for low back pain from multiple providers who may not coordinate their treatments. This study evaluated the perceived feasibility of a patient-centered practice model for back pain, including facilitators for interprofessional collaboration between family medicine physicians and doctors of chiropractic. Design and Methods This qualitative evaluation was a component of a randomized controlled trial of 3 interdisciplinary models for back pain management: usual medical care; concurrent medical and chiropractic care; and collaborative medical and chiropractic care with interprofessional education, clinical record exchange, and team-based case management. Data collection included clinician interviews, chart abstractions, and fieldnotes analyzed with qualitative content analysis. An organizational-level framework for dissemination of health care interventions identified norms/attitudes, organizational structures and processes, resources, networks-linkages, and change agents that supported model implementation. Results Clinicians interviewed included 13 family medicine residents and 6 chiropractors. Clinicians were receptive to interprofessional education, noting the experience introduced them to new colleagues and the treatment approaches of the cooperating profession. Clinicians exchanged high volumes of clinical records, but found the logistics cumbersome. Team-based case management enhanced information flow, social support, and interaction between individual patients and the collaborating providers. Older patients were viewed positively as change agents for interprofessional collaboration between these provider groups. Implications Family medicine residents and doctors of chiropractic viewed collaborative care as a useful practice model for older adults with back pain. Health care organizations adopting medical and chiropractic collaboration can tailor this general model to their specific setting to support implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Christine M Goertz
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Robert D Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Maria A Hondras
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Andrew A Andresen
- Quad City Genesis Family Medicine Residency Program, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Cynthia R Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Kevin J Lyons
- Center for Collaborative Research, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lisa Z Killinger
- Department of Diagnosis & Radiology, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Robert B Wallace
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Degenhardt BF, Johnson JC, Brooks WJ, Norman L. Characterizing Adverse Events Reported Immediately After Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment. J Osteopath Med 2018; 118:141-149. [DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2018.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Context
Although adverse events in various types of manual therapy have been previously investigated, little is known about the incidence and types of adverse events that occur after osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT).
Objective
To estimate the incidence and characterize the types of adverse events that patients report after OMT and prior to leaving the office to increase the likelihood of identifying adverse events caused by OMT.
Methods
As part of a prospective study evaluating the use and effectiveness of OMT, patients assessed how they felt immediately after OMT compared with before OMT using a 5-point ordinal rating scale (much better, better, about the same, worse, much worse). For patients who indicated they felt their condition had changed, a follow-up, open-ended question asked them to describe how it had changed. Patients who felt worse or much worse were considered to have experienced an adverse event. Two reviewers independently coded the types of adverse events based on the descriptions provided by the patients. Generalized logistic regression models were used to calculate incidence rates and 95% CIs for the types of adverse events. These models were also used to calculate the ORs and 95% CIs for associations of adverse events with demographic characteristics and with individual OMT techniques after accounting for demographic characteristics.
Results
Immediately after OMT, 884 patients provided data at 1847 office visits (663 [76%] women; 794 [92%] identified as white; mean [SD] age, 51.8 [15.8] years). Patients reported they felt worse or much worse immediately after OMT at 45 office visits; the incidence rate for adverse events was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.3%-4.7%). Pain/discomfort was the most commonly identified type of adverse event (16 [0.9%]; 95% CI, 0.5%-1.6%). Insufficient information was provided to determine the type of adverse event at 20 office visits. Women reported adverse events more frequently than men (OR, 13.9; 95% CI, 1.7-115.6; P=.01).
Conclusion
The incidence of adverse events immediately after OMT, most commonly pain/discomfort, was lower than previous reports from other manual medicine disciplines. Larger studies are needed to determine the incidence of serious adverse events and to assess adverse events that occur in the days following OMT.
Collapse
|
21
|
Swait G, Finch R. What are the risks of manual treatment of the spine? A scoping review for clinicians. Chiropr Man Therap 2017; 25:37. [PMID: 29234493 PMCID: PMC5719861 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-017-0168-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Communicating to patients the risks of manual treatment to the spine is an important, but challenging element of informed consent. This scoping review aimed to characterise and summarise the available literature on risks and to describe implications for clinical practice and research. Method A methodological framework for scoping reviews was followed. Systematic searches were conducted during June 2017. The quantity, nature and sources of literature were described. Findings of included studies were narratively summarised, highlighting key clinical points. Results Two hundred and fifty articles were included. Cases of serious adverse events were reported. Observational studies, randomised studies and systematic reviews were also identified, reporting both benign and serious adverse events.Benign adverse events were reported to occur commonly in adults and children. Predictive factors for risk are unclear, but for neck pain patients might include higher levels of neck disability or cervical manipulation. In neck pain patients benign adverse events may result in poorer short term, but not long term outcomes.Serious adverse event incidence estimates ranged from 1 per 2 million manipulations to 13 per 10,000 patients. Cases are reported in adults and children, including spinal or neurological problems as well as cervical arterial strokes. Case-control studies indicate some association, in the under 45 years age group, between manual interventions and cervical arterial stroke, however it is unclear whether this is causal. Elderly patients have no greater risk of traumatic injury compared with visiting a medical practitioner for neuro-musculoskeletal problems, however some underlying conditions may increase risk. Conclusion Existing literature indicates that benign adverse events following manual treatments to the spine are common, while serious adverse events are rare. The incidence and causal relationships with serious adverse events are challenging to establish, with gaps in the literature and inherent methodological limitations of studies. Clinicians should ensure that patients are informed of risks during the consent process. Since serious adverse events could result from pre-existing pathologies, assessment for signs or symptoms of these is important. Clinicians may also contribute to furthering understanding by utilising patient safety incident reporting and learning systems where adverse events have occurred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Swait
- The Royal College of Chiropractors, Chiltern Chambers, St. Peters Avenue, Reading, RG4 7DH UK
| | - Rob Finch
- The Royal College of Chiropractors, Chiltern Chambers, St. Peters Avenue, Reading, RG4 7DH UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Goertz CM, Salsbury SA, Long CR, Vining RD, Andresen AA, Hondras MA, Lyons KJ, Killinger LZ, Wolinsky FD, Wallace RB. Patient-centered professional practice models for managing low back pain in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17:235. [PMID: 29029606 PMCID: PMC5640949 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0624-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain is a debilitating condition for older adults, who may seek healthcare from multiple providers. Few studies have evaluated impacts of different healthcare delivery models on back pain outcomes in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of older adults receiving back pain treatment under 3 professional practice models that included primary medical care with or without chiropractic care. METHODS We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial with 131 community-dwelling, ambulatory older adults with subacute or chronic low back pain. Participants were randomly allocated to 12 weeks of individualized primary medical care (Medical Care), concurrent medical and chiropractic care (Dual Care), or medical and chiropractic care with enhanced interprofessional collaboration (Shared Care). Primary outcomes were low back pain intensity rated on the numerical rating scale and back-related disability measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included clinical measures, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analyses included mixed-effects regression models and general estimating equations. RESULTS At 12 weeks, participants in all three treatment groups reported improvements in mean average low back pain intensity [Shared Care: 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.6; Dual Care: 3.0; 95% CI 2.3 to 3.8; Medical Care: 2.3; 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2)] and back-related disability (Shared Care: 2.8; 95% CI 1.6 to 4.0; Dual Care: 2.5; 95% CI 1.3 to 3.7; Medical Care: 1.5; 95% CI 0.2 to 2.8). No statistically significant differences were noted between the three groups on the primary measures. Participants in both models that included chiropractic reported significantly better perceived low back pain improvement, overall health and quality of life, and greater satisfaction with healthcare services than patients who received medical care alone. CONCLUSIONS Professional practice models that included primary care and chiropractic care led to modest improvements in low back pain intensity and disability for older adults, with chiropractic-inclusive models resulting in better perceived improvement and patient satisfaction over the primary care model alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01312233 , 4 March 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine M Goertz
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA. .,SpineIQ, The Spine Institute for Quality, Davenport, IA, USA.
| | - Stacie A Salsbury
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Cynthia R Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Robert D Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA
| | | | - Maria A Hondras
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Lisa Z Killinger
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA
| | - Fredric D Wolinsky
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Robert B Wallace
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hawk C, Schneider MJ, Haas M, Katz P, Dougherty P, Gleberzon B, Killinger LZ, Weeks J. Best Practices for Chiropractic Care for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Consensus Update. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2017; 40:217-229. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 12/10/2016] [Accepted: 02/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|