Are There 3D Changes in Spine and Rod Shape in the 2 Years After Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Instrumentation?

Breaking the Rules in Three Dimensions: What to Expect After a Thoracic-only Fusion With Structural Thoracic and Thoracolumbar Curves

OBJECTIVE

Despite guidelines to fuse both thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TH/L) curves in patients with structural curves in both regions, a thoracic-only fusion allows preservation of lumbar motion segments. The purpose of this study was to assess the 2-year postoperative three-dimensional (3D) radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with double or triple major (thoracic curves >TH/L curves) structural curves who underwent a thoracic-only fusion.

METHODS

A prospective adolescent idiopathic scoliosis registry was queried for double or triple major curves undergoing thoracic-only posterior fusion and a minimum 2-year follow-up. 3D reconstructions were generated from bi-planar radiographs. Paired sample t tests were used to assess differences in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes pre and postoperatively, as well as Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire-22 scores. Pearson correlations were utilized to identify variables related to spontaneous lumbar derotation.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Both thoracic [61 ± 10 degrees to 20 ± 9 degrees ( P < 0.001)] and lumbar curves [41 ± 7 degrees to 22±7 degrees ( P < 0.001)] had significant coronal improvement and T5 to T12 kyphosis improved from 7 ± 14 degrees to 23 ± 8 degrees ( P < 0.001). The thoracic apical translation was significantly improved postoperatively (4.7 ± 1.5 to 0.5 ± 1 cm, P < 0.001), but the lumbar apical translation was unchanged (-1.7 ± 0.6 to -1.7±0.8 cm, P = 0.94). Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire-22 scores significantly improved by 2 years postoperative.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike the 3D correction observed in nonstructural TH/L curves after thoracic-only fusion, patients with double or triple major curves demonstrated only spontaneous coronal correction of the lumbar curve, whereas the sagittal and axial planes were not significantly improved. These radiographic parameters did not negatively affect subjective or clinical outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-therapeutic.

Systematic review and meta-analysis for the impact of rod materials and sizes in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To assess surgical and safety outcomes associated with different rod materials and diameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluated the surgical management of AIS patients using pedicle screw fixation systems (i.e., posterior rods and pedicle screws) with rods of different materials and sizes. Postoperative surgical outcomes (e.g., kyphosis and coronal correction) and complications (i.e., hyper/hypo-lumbar lordosis, proximal junctional kyphosis, revisions, reoperations, and infections) were assessed. Random-effects models (REMs) pooled data for outcomes reported in ≥ 2 studies.

RESULTS

Among 75 studies evaluating AIS surgery using pedicle screw fixation systems, 46 described rod materials and/or diameters. Two studies directly comparing titanium (Ti) and cobalt-chromium (CoCr) rods found that CoCr rods provided significantly better postoperative kyphosis angle correction vs. Ti rods during a shorter follow-up (0-3 months, MD = - 2.98°, 95% CI - 5.79 to - 0.17°, p = 0.04), and longer follow-up (≥ 24 months, MD = - 3.99°, 95% CI - 6.98 to - 1.00, p = 0.009). Surgical infection varied from 2% (95% CI 1.0-3.0%) for 5.5 mm rods to 4% (95% CI 2.0-7.0%) for 6 mm rods. Reoperation rates were lower with 5.5 mm rods 1% (95% CI 0.0-3.0%) vs. 6 mm rods [6% (95% CI 2.0-9.0%); p = 0.04]. Differences in coronal angle, lumbar lordosis, proximal junctional kyphosis, revisions, and infections did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) among rods of different materials or diameters.

CONCLUSION

For AIS, CoCr rods provided better correction of thoracic kyphosis compared to Ti rods. Patients with 5.5 mm rods had fewer reoperations vs. 6.0 and 6.35 mm diameter rods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

How do spine instrumentation parameters influence the 3D correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A patient-specific biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific models promises to support the surgical decision-making process, particularly in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The present computational biomechanical study investigates how specific instrumentation parameters impact 3D deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis.

METHODS

1080 instrumentation simulations of a representative patient were run. The independent instrumentation parameters were: screw pattern, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, rod curvature and rod stiffness. ANOVA and correlation analyses analyzed how the instrumentation parameters influenced the 3D correction.

FINDINGS

Coronal plane correction was affected by the lower instrumented vertebra and rod stiffness (explaining 84% and 11%, respectively, of its overall variance). The sagittal profile was controlled by rod curvature and the upper vertebra (56% and 36%). The transverse plane vertebral rotation was influenced by lower, upper instrumented vertebra and screw pattern (35%, 32% and 19%). The Cobb angle correction was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae, particularly when grouped by the upper instrumented vertebra (r = -0.91) and rod stiffness (r = -0.73). Thoracic kyphosis was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by rod curvature (r = 0.84). Apical vertebral rotation was moderately correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by upper/lower instrumented vertebra (r = 0.55/0.58), although variations were minimal.

INTERPRETATION

Instrumenting the last vertebra touching the central sacral vertical line improves 3D correction. A trade-off between a more cranial vs. caudal upper instrumented vertebra, respectively beneficial for coronal/sagittal vs. transverse plane correction, is required. High rod stiffness, differential rod contouring, and screw pattern were effective for coronal correction, thoracic kyphosis, and axial vertebral derotation, respectively.

In silico patient-specific optimization of correction strategies for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

With modelling and simulation (or in silico) techniques, patient-specific optimization algorithms represent promising tools to support the surgical decision-making process, particularly in 3D correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, where the best intraoperative instrumentation strategy and the correction goals are debated.

METHODS

1080 biomechanical intraoperative simulations of a representative pediatric thoracic curve were run according to a full-factorial design approach. Widely accepted instrumentation configurations (5 screw patterns, 4 upper and 3 lower instrumented vertebrae, 6 rod curvatures and 3 rod stiffnesses) were analyzed, assuming concave rod rotation and en bloc derotation as main correction maneuvers. Results in terms of 3D correction and mobility were rated using an objective function for thoracic scoliosis also including surgeon-dependent correction objectives. An extensive sensitivity analysis on correction objectives was performed.

FINDINGS

Multiple optimal strategies were identified, depending on the selected correction objective. They provided significantly better coronal (67% vs. 55%) correction, using comparable instrumented levels (9.9 ± 1.6 vs. 10.7 ± 2.1), screw patterns and significantly higher implant density (1.6 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.2 screws/vertebra) compared to worst ones. Optimal strategies typically included the neutral and the last touching vertebrae in the construct and high stiffness (CoCr, 6 mm) differentially/highly contoured rods.

INTERPRETATION

The computerized algorithm determined the best instrumentation parameters to achieve optimal correction for the considered thoracic case. Multiple clinically equivalent strategies may be used, as supported by the variety of considered correction objectives. The current approach could be translated to any scoliotic curves, including surgeon preferences in terms of instrumentation parameters, intraoperative correction maneuvers and correction objectives.

Changes in the Position of the Junctional Vertebrae After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Implication in Risk Assessment of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Development

BACKGROUND

The development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a major problem. Changes in the global sagittal parameters as they relate to PJK have been reported after surgery, however, the relationships between the changes in the upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) during and after surgery as they relate to development of PJK have not been quantified. We hypothesize that the compensatory changes in the unfused segments of the spine over time are correlated with the surgically induced changes in the UIV position.

METHODS

Sixty adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (with at least 1-year follow-up) who underwent posterior spinal surgery were included retrospectively. Global spinal parameters were calculated using 3-dimensional models of the spine, additional parameters [proximal junctional kyphosis angle (PJKA), cervical lordosis angle] were measured manually before surgery and at 3 postoperative follow-ups. The 3-dimensional position of the vertebral body centroids was calculated for T1, UIV, and lower-instrumented vertebra at all timepoints. The sagittal position of T1, UIV, and lower-instrumented vertebra were correlated to the cervical lordosis, PJKA, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt.

RESULTS

The position of T1 and UIV were significantly more anterior at first erect for patients who developed PJK. The posterior shift of UIV at the most recent follow-up as compared with the preoperative position was significant in both the PJK and non-PJK cohort. A larger anterior shift in UIV at first erect correlated with a larger T1 and UIV posterior shift at the most recent follow-up. At the most recent follow-up, a more posterior position of the UIV correlated with a larger angle of PJKA (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both a larger anterior shift of UIV between preoperative and first erect and a more posterior position of UIV at the most recent follow-up was correlated with a higher PJKA. A larger anterior shift in the position of the UIV after surgery was associated with a higher posterior shift of UIV at the last follow-up. The surgically induced changes in the UIV are an important parameter associated with the development of PJK.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment After Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between the nonscoliotic controls, preoperative, and different time points postoperative in Lenke 1 and 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The postoperative changes in the sagittal profile of Lenke 1 and 5 AIS at varying time points after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) has not been rigorously demonstrated; studies performed have had conflicting results.

METHODS

Sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), for Lenke 1 and 5 preoperatively, at immediate, less than 2-year, and more than 2-year postoperatively, and for nonscoliotic adolescents were searched. Differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between preoperative and the follow-ups and between the nonscoliotic and pre- and postoperative AIS subtypes were calculated through meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies on Lenke1 (1229 patients), 13 studies on Lenke5 (437 patients), and 18 studies on controls (1636 patients) were reviewed. Among all the measured variables, only PI in Lenke1 was significantly different between the final follow-up and controls, P < 0.05. In Lenke 1, SVA was significantly more anterior at the immediate postoperative than preoperative, but continued moving posteriorly up to 2-year postoperative resulting in no significant difference in the SVA position between the final follow-up and preoperative, P > 0.05. In Lenke 5, SVA was significantly more posterior at the immediate postoperative and more anterior at the final follow-up than the preoperative measurements, p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous changes in the sagittal spinal parameters should be expected after PSF. Normalization of the sagittal spinal parameters appears to be the rule after PSF, and watchful waiting appears to be appropriate in this population when viewing the lateral X-ray postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.