What Is the Fate of Pseudarthrosis Detected 1 Year After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

Analysis of risk factors for non-fusion of bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A clinical retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Bone graft fusion is a major concern among surgeons after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery as non-fusion may lead to further physical and drug therapies.

METHODS

The related risk elements of non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF surgery were retrospectively assessed. Patients receiving ACDF operation in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the criteria, 107 study subjects were recruited with a total of 164 surgical segments. The general information of patients, bone graft materials, imaging parameters, and clinical efficacy was recorded. T-test, chi-square test and binary logistic regression evaluation were employed to explore the risk factors of bone graft nonunion.

RESULTS

Low housefield unit (HU) value, diabetes, allogeneic bone, and hydroxyapatite (HA) artificial bone could be risk factors for bone graft fusion in ACDF surgery. Further multivariate analysis was performed and confirmed those related factors of bone graft non-fusion including low HU value (non-fusion rate: 32.53% [27/83], OR = 5.024, p = 0.025), diabetes (non-fusion rate: 53.33% [8/15], OR = 4.776, p = 0.031), allogeneic bone (18.57% [13/70], OR = 3.964, p = 0.046), and artificial bone (68.29% [28/41], OR = 50.550, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

By looking at bone graft fusion, selecting autologous iliac bone is an ideal selection to avoid non-fusion of bone graft in ACDF. Diabetes was more important predictor of bone graft nonunion than low HU value. Larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to further confirm these findings in the future.

Management Considerations for Cervical Corpectomy: Updated Indications and Future Directions

Together, lower back and neck pain are among the leading causes of acquired disability worldwide and have experienced a marked increase over the past 25 years. Paralleled with the increasing aging population and the rise in chronic disease, this trend is only predicted to contribute to the growing global burden. In the context of cervical neck pain, this symptom is most often a manifestation of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). Traditionally, multilevel neck pain related to DDD that is recalcitrant to both physical and medical therapy can be treated with a procedure known as cervical corpectomy. Presently, there are many flavors of cervical corpectomy; however, the overarching goal is the removal of the pain-generating disc via the employment of the modern anterior approach. In this review, we will briefly detail the pathophysiological mechanism behind DDD, overview the development of the anterior approach, and discuss the current state of treatment options for said pathology. Furthermore, this review will also add to the current body of literature surrounding updated indications, surgical techniques, and patient outcomes related to cervical corpectomy. Finally, our discussion ends with highlighting the future direction of cervical corpectomy through the introduction of the "skip corpectomy" and distractable mesh cages.

Comparing outcomes between anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) have emerged as two increasingly popular alternatives to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the management of cervical radiculopathy. Both techniques provide advantages of segmental motion preservation and lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) compared to ACDF.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and functional outcomes of patients undergoing ACDR or MI-PCF for the treatment of unilateral cervical radiculopathy.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective Cohort Review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 152 patients were included (86 ACDR and 66 MI-PCF).

OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Patient demographics; (2) perioperative data; (3) rates of complications and revisions; (5) visual analogue scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was performed to identify all patients at a single institution between 2012-2020 who underwent 1- or 2- level ACDR or MI-PCF from C3-C7 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patient demographics, perioperative data, postoperative complications, and revisions were analyzed. Patient reported outcome measures including VAS and NDI scores were compared.

RESULTS

The ACDR group had a significantly greater mean operative time (99.8 minutes vs 79.2 minutes, p<.001), but comparable estimated blood loss and length of stay following surgical intervention (p=.899). The overall complication rate was significantly greater in the ACDR group than the MI-PCF group (24.4% vs 6.2%; p=.003) but was largely driven by approach-related dysphagia in 20.9% of ACDR patients. The MI-PCF group had significantly greater revision rates (13.6% vs 1.2%; p=.002) with an average time to revision of 20.7 months in the MI-PCF group compared to 40.3 months in the ACDR group. The ACDR cohort had significantly greater improvements in NDI scores at the final follow-up (25.0 vs 21.3, p<.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that ACDR offer clinically relevant advantages over MI-PCF in terms of long-term revision rates despite an increased approach-related risk of transient postoperative dysphagia. Additionally, patients in the ACDR cohort achieved greater mean improvements in NDI scores but these results may have limited clinical significance due to inability to reach minimally clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds.

Opioid Use Increases the Rate of Pseudarthrosis and Revision Surgery in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) quantify the risk opioids impart on pseudarthrosis development, (2) analyze the effect of pseudarthrosis on clinical outcomes, and (3) identify if the amount of opioids prescribed are predictive of pseudarthrosis revision.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF at a single institution between 2017-2019 were retrospectively identified. Postoperative dynamic cervical spine radiographs were reviewed to assess fusion status. Logistic regression models measured the effect of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed on the likelihood of pseudarthrosis development. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to predict the probability of surgical revision based on MME prescribed.

RESULTS

Of 298 included patients, an average of 2.01 ± 0.82 levels were included in the construct and 121 (40.9%) patients were diagnosed with a pseudarthrosis. However, only 14 (4.7%) required a pseudarthrosis revision. Patients requiring pseudarthrosis revision had worse one-year postoperative Δ PCS-12 (-1.70 vs. 7.58, P = 0.004), Δ NDI (3.33 vs. -15.26, P = 0.002), and Δ VAS Arm (2.33 vs. -2.48, P = .047). Multivariate logistic regression analyses found the three-month postoperative (OR=1.00, P = .010), one-year postoperative (OR=1.001, P = 0.025), and combined pre- and postoperative MME (OR=1.000, P = .035) increased the risk of pseudarthrosis. ROC analysis identified cutoff values to predict pseudarthrosis revision at 90.00 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.693, confidence interval (CI): 0.554-0.832), 132.86 (0.710, CI: 0.589-0.840), 224.76 (0.687, CI: 0.558-0.817) and 285.00 (0.711, CI: 0.585-0.837) MME in the preoperative, three-month postoperative, one-year postoperative, and combined pre-and postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Increased prescription of opioid medications following ACDF procedures may increase the risk of pseudarthrosis development and revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Comparison of Different Osteobiologics in Terms of Imaging Modalities and Time Frames for Fusion Assessment in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

The study's primary objective was to determine how osteobiologic choice affects fusion rates in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The study's secondary objectives were to 1) determine the optimal timing of fusion assessment following ACDF and 2) determine if osteobiologic type affects the timing and optimal modality of fusion assessment.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE was conducted for literature published from 2000 through October 2020 comparing anterior fusion in the cervical spine with various osteobiologics. Both comparative studies and case series of ≥10 patients were included.

RESULTS

A total of 74 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen studies evaluated the efficacy of autograft on fusion outcomes, and 23 studies assessed the efficacy of allograft on fusion outcomes. 3 studies evaluated the efficacy of demineralized bone matrix, and seven assessed the efficacy of rhBMP-2 on fusion outcomes. Other limited studies evaluated the efficacy of ceramics and bioactive glasses on fusion outcomes, and 4 assessed the efficacy of stem cell products. Most studies utilized dynamic radiographs for the assessment of fusion. Overall, there was a general lack of supportive data to determine the optimal timing of fusion assessment meaningfully or if osteobiologic type influenced fusion timing.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving fusion following ACDF appears to remain an intricate interplay between host biology and various surgical factors, including the selection of osteobiologics. While alternative osteobiologics to autograft exist and may produce acceptable fusion rates, limitations in study methodology prevent any definitive conclusions from existing literature.

A Comparison between Structural Allografts and Polyetheretherketone Interbody Spacers Used in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Among interbody implants used during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), structural allografts and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are the most used spacers. Currently, no consensus has been established regarding the superiority of either implant, with US surgeons preferring structural allografts, whereas UK surgeons preferring PEEK. The purpose of this systematic review (level of evidence, 4) was to compare postoperative and patient-reported outcomes between the use of structural allografts PEEK interbody spacers during ACDF. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were searched for articles comparing the usage of structural allograft and PEEK interbody spacers during ACDF procedures from inception to April 10, 2023. The searches were conducted using the keywords "Spine," "Allograft," and "PEEK" and were performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Subsequent quality and sensitivity analyses were performed on the included studies. Nine studies involving 1,074 patients were included. Compared with the PEEK group, the structural allograft group had comparable rates of postoperative pseudoarthrosis (p=0.58). However, when stratified according to the number of levels treated, the 3-level ACDF PEEK group was 3.45 times more likely to have postoperative pseudoarthrosis than the structural allograft group (p=0.01). Subsequent postoperative outcomes (rate of subsidence and change in the preoperative and postoperative segmental disc heights) were comparable between the PEEK and structural allograft groups. Patient-reported outcomes (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] of neck pain and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) were comparable. This study showed that for 3-level ACDFs, the use of structural allografts may confer higher fusion rates. However, VAS neck pain, NDI, and subsidence rates were comparable between structural allografts and PEEK cages. In addition, no significant difference in pseudoarthrosis rates was found between PEEK cages and structural allografts in patients undergoing 1- and 2-level ACDFs.

Structural Allograft Versus Mechanical Interbody Devices Augmented With Osteobiologics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Literature Review.

OBJECTIVE

Perform a systematic review evaluating postoperative fusion rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using structural allograft vs various interbody devices augmented with different osteobiologic materials.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed. Included studies were those that reported results of 1-4 levels ACDF using pure structural allograft compared with a mechanical interbody device augmented with an osteobiologic. Excluded studies were those that reported on ACDF with cervical corpectomy; anterior and posterior cervical fusions; circumferential (360° or 540°) fusion or revision ACDF for nonunion or other conditions. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane review guidelines.

RESULTS

8 articles reporting fusion rates of structural allograft and an interbody device/osteobiologic pair were included. All included studies compared fusion rates following ACDF among structural allograft vs non-allograft interbody device/osteobiologic pairs. Fusion rates were reported between 84% and 100% for structural allograft, while fusion rates for various interbody device/osteobiologic combinations ranged from 26% to 100%. Among non-allograft cage groups fusion rates varied from 73-100%. One study found PEEK cages filled with combinations of autograft, allograft, and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) to have an overall fusion rate of 26%. In one study comparing plate and zero-profile constructs, there was no difference in fusion rates for two-level fusions.

CONCLUSION

There was limited data comparing fusion outcomes of patients undergoing ACDF using structural allograft vs interbody devices augmented with osteobiologic materials to support superiority of one method.

Fate of pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Prior study has shown that 70% of cervical pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) detected at 1 year will go on to fusion by 2 year. Pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after ACDF may have different bone healing potential compared to nonunion detected 1 year after surgery. Therefore, it might have a different clinical significance.

PURPOSE

To examine the radiographic and clinical prognosis of pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after ACDF with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

A total of 249 patients who completed a 5-year follow-up after ACDF.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Clinical outcomes such as neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS), arm pain VAS, and neck disability index (NDI) and radiographic assessment such as X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan.

METHODS

A total of 249 patients who completed a 5-year follow-up after ACDF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were diagnosed with pseudarthrosis at 2 years postoperatively were included. Fusion, neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI were assessed. The results were compared between the union group (patients who achieved union), and the nonunion group (patients with pseudarthrosis) at 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Among the patients who had pseudarthrosis at 2 years postoperatively, the fusion rate at 5 years was 32.6% (14/43). While the union group showed continued improvements in neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI until 5 years, the nonunion group showed significant worsening of arm pain VAS and NDI at 5 years, with the values of neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI being significantly worse than those of the union group at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of pseudarthrosis detected at 2 years postoperatively after ACDF was 67.4%, and it remained unfused at 5 years postoperatively. Nonunion identified 2 years after ACDF may be considered a poor prognostic factor because it has less potential to achieve fusion with further follow-up and a higher chance of worsening clinical symptoms. Therefore, the presence of fusion at the 2-year follow-up can be considered an indicator of the success of the surgery.

Foraminal Restenosis After Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate incidence, risk factor, and clinical effect of bone regrowth after posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF).

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients who underwent PCF for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and were followed up for >2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Foraminal dimension, sagittal gap at resected area, facet thickness, lamina length, and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured. Neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS), arm pain VAS, and neck disability index (NDI) were recorded. Radiographic measures were compared between segments with foraminal narrowing of ≥20% at the 2-years follow-up (restenosis segments) and foraminal narrowing of <20% (patent segments).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients with 109 segments were included. 73.4% (80/109) of foramens demonstrated foraminal narrowing and decrease of foraminal dimension of ≥20% occurred in 30.3% (30/109). Foraminal dimension at postoperative 2-days was significantly higher in the restenosis segments (P = .047). Furthermore, increase of foraminal dimension was significantly associated with foraminal restenosis of ≥20% (P = .018). Facet thickness was significantly higher in the restenosis segments compared to patent segments at postoperative 2-years follow-up (P = .038). Neck pain VAS was significantly aggravated only in the restenosis group at postoperative 2-years follow-up (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Foraminal narrowing commonly occurs after PCF due to bone healing. Bone growth occurs in all directions while medial facet growth contributes more to foraminal restenosis. Greater widening of foramen during PCF is a risk factor for postoperative foramen restenosis. Therefore, amount of bone resection should be kept optimal and excessive resection should be avoided to prevent foramen restenosis.

Effects of Structural Allograft versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Inter body spacers have been widely used in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery; however, it is not clear whether one implant shows superior clinical outcomes compared with the other. This systematic review and meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the radiologic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of structural allograft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

Extensive literature searches were conducted on online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Library, until January 2023. The present study adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool were used to assess the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, encompassing 8020 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The results indicate that structural allografts show a higher fusion rate compared with PEEK implants (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.37; P ＝0.03; I2 = 71%). In addition, the structural allograft group also had a lower pseudarthrosis rate (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.80; P = 0.009; I2 = 75%) and reoperation rate (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81; P = 0.007; I2 = 38%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review and meta-analysis show that structural allograft has a higher fusion rate compared with PEEK implants in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. In addition, structural allograft has a lower pseudarthrosis rate and reoperation rate.

Risk Factors of Nonfusion after Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in the Early Postoperative Period: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Although high fusion rates have been reported for anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in the medium and long term, the risk of nonfusion in the early period after ACDF remains substantial. This study investigates early risk factors for cage nonfusion in patients undergoing single- or multi-level ACDF.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. From August 2020 to December 2021, 107 patients with ACDF, including 197 segments, were enrolled, with a follow-up of 3 months. Among the 197 segments, 155 were diagnosed with nonfusion (Nonfusion group), and 42 were diagnosed with fusion (Fusion group) in the early period after ACDF. We assessed the significance of the patient-specific factors, radiographic indicators, serum factors, and clinical outcomes. The Wilcoxon rank sum test, t-tests, analysis of variance, and stepwise multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that smoking, insufficient improvement in the C2-7 Cobb angle (p = 0.024) and the functional spinal unit Cobb angle (p = 0.022) between preoperative and postoperative stages and lower serum calcium (fusion: 2.34 ± 0.12 mmol/L; nonfusion: 2.28 ± 0.17 mmol/L, p = 0.003) β-carboxyterminal telopeptide end of type 1 collagen (β-CTX) (fusion: 0.51 [0.38, 0.71]; nonfusion: 0.43 [0.31, 0.57], p = 0.008), and N-terminal fragment of osteocalcin (N-MID-BGP) (fusion: 18.30 [12.15, 22.60]; nonfusion: 14.45 [11.65, 18.60], p = 0.023) are risk factors for nonfusion in the early period after ACDF. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that poor C2-7 Cobb angle improvement (odds ratio [OR], 1.107 [1.019-1.204], p = 0.017) and lower serum calcium (OR, 3.700 [1.138-12.032], p = 0.030) are risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with successful fusion after ACDF had higher preoperative serum calcium and improved C2-7 Cobb angle than nonfusion patients at 3 months. These findings suggest that serum calcium could be used to identify patients at risk of nonfusion following ACDF and that correcting the C2-7 Cobb angle during surgery could potentially increase fusion in the early period after ACDF.

Interbody Cage Placement Without Plate Supplementation Adjacent to Plated Segments in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of hybrid anterior cervical fixation, focusing on stand-alone segments.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In the treatment of multilevel cervical stenosis, the number of segments fixed using a plate is limited by placing an interbody cage without plate supplementation at one end of the surgical segment to reduce long plate-related problems. However, the stand-alone segment may experience cage extrusion, subsidence, cervical alignment deterioration, and nonunion.

METHODS

Patients who underwent three-segment or four-segment fixation for cervical degenerative disease and completed one-year follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: a cranial group, with stand-alone segments located at the cranial end adjacent to plated segments, and a caudal group, with stand-alone segments located at the caudal end. Differences in radiographic outcomes between the groups were evaluated. Fusion was defined using dynamic radiographs or computed tomography. To identify factors associated with nonunion in stand-alone segments, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. To identify factors associated with cage subsidence, multiple regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients (mean age, 59±11 y; 72% male; mean fixed segments, 3.7±0.5 segments) were included in this study. No case showed cage extrusion or plate dislodgement. In stand-alone segments, the fusion rate was significantly lower in the caudal group than in the cranial group (76% vs. 93%, P =0.019). Change in the cervical sagittal vertical axis was worse in the caudal group than in the cranial group (2.7±12.3 mm vs. -2.7±8.1 mm, P =0.006). One caudal group patient required additional surgery because of nonunion at the stand-alone segment. Multivariable logistic regression indicated factors associated with nonunion included the location of the stand-alone segment (caudal end: OR 4.67, 95% CI, 1.29-16.90), larger pre-disk space range of motion (OR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.04-1.27), and lower preoperative disk space height (OR 0.57, 95% CI, 0.37-0.87). Multiple regression analysis indicated that higher cage height and lower pre-disk space height were associated with cage subsidence.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid anterior cervical fixation with stand-alone interbody cage placement adjacent to plated segments may avoid long plate-related problems. Our results suggest that the cranial end of the construct may be more suitable for the stand-alone segment than the caudal end.

Observational, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Cervical Disk Arthroplasty With Mobi-C in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disk Disease. Results at 10 years Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Cervical disk arthroplasty replacement (CDA) was developed to avoid specific disadvantages of cervical fusion. The purpose of this paper is to provide 10-year follow-up results of an ongoing prospective study after CDA.

METHODS

Three hundred eighty-four patients treated using the Mobi-C (ZimVie, Troyes, France) were included in a prospective multicenter study. Routine clinical and radiologic examinations were reported preoperatively and postoperatively with up to 10-year follow-up. Complications and revision surgeries were also documented.

RESULTS

At 10 years showed significant improvement in all clinical outcomes [Neck Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS) for arm and neck pain, physical component summary of SF36, and mental component summary of SF36). Motion at the index level increased significantly over baseline (mean range of motion=7.6 vs. 8 degrees at five years and 6.0 degrees preoperatively; P <0.001) and 71.3% of the implanted segments remained mobile (range of motion>3 degrees). Adjacent disks were also mobile at 10 years with the same mobility as preoperatively. At 10 years, 20.9% of the implanted segments demonstrated no heterotopic ossification. Thirty-four patients (8.9%) experienced 41 adverse events, with or without reoperation during the first five years. We found only two additional surgeries after five years. We observed an increased percentage of working patients and a decrease in medication consumption. Regarding the overall outcome, 94% of patients were satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 10-year results showed significant improvement in all clinical outcomes, with low rates of revision or failure. This experience in patients with long-term follow-up after CDA endorses durable, favorable outcomes in properly selected patients.

Complications of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgery performed on the cervical spine, and the number of its cases has tripled over the last two decades. Although this intervention is typically safe and effective, it carries an inherent complication risk, which should not be underestimated. Improvements in surgical techniques and advances in interbody fusion devices and plating systems have certainly reduced the rate of postoperative morbidity, but despite such progress, surgeons need to beware consistently of the potential complications, inform the patient of their possibility, and have a management strategy as they develop. This review discusses postoperative morbidity encountered in recently reported large studies on ACDF and highlights the senior author's own single-surgeon experience with 2579 such procedures performed between 1998 and 2017. In his clinical series, which is the largest one reported to date, the overall complication rate was 7.0% (180 cases), and dysphagia (1.9% of cases), graft/hardware failures (1.3% of cases), and postoperative hematomas (0.9% of cases) were noted most frequently. Understanding of the risk and clinical impact of complications after ACDF is very important and every effort should be put on their possible avoidance and on appropriate management when they do occur.

Assessment of Fusion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm

BACKGROUND

A convolutional neural network (CNN) is a deep learning (DL) model specialized for image processing, analysis, and classification.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we evaluated whether a CNN model using lateral cervical spine radiographs as input data can help assess fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic imaging study using DL.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included 187 patients who underwent ACDF and fusion assessment with postoperative one-year computed tomography and neutral and dynamic lateral cervical spine radiographs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The performance of the CNN-based DL algorithm was evaluated in terms of accuracy and area under the curve.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fusion or nonunion was confirmed by cervical spine computed tomography. Among the 187 patients, 69.5% (130 patients) were randomly selected as the training set, and the remaining 30.5% (57 patients) were assigned to the validation set to evaluate model performance. Radiographs of the cervical spine were used as input images to develop a CNN-based DL algorithm. The CNN algorithm used three radiographs (neutral, flexion, and extension) per patient and showed the diagnostic results as fusion (0) or nonunion (1) for each radiograph. By combining the results of the three radiographs, the final decision for a patient was determined to be fusion (fusion ≥2) or nonunion (fusion ≤1). By combining the results of the three radiographs, the final decision for a patient was determined as fusion (fusion ≥2) or nonunion (nonunion ≤1).

RESULTS

The CNN-based DL model demonstrated an accuracy of 89.5% and an area under the curve of 0.889 (95% confidence interval, 0.793-0.984).

CONCLUSION

The CNN algorithm for fusion assessment after ACDF trained using lateral cervical radiographs showed a relatively high diagnostic accuracy of 89.5% and is expected to be a useful aid in detecting pseudarthrosis.

Performing the 3-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Technical Pearls to Maximize Fusion Rates and Reduce Postoperative Complications

The anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is a common and effective treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy, either with or without concomitant radiculopathy. In many cases, patients with degenerative cervical spondylosis can present with disease at multiple levels. With each additional level included in the procedure, rates of complication rate can increase-both due to the nature of the anterior cervical approach (dysphagia) as well as fusion across all levels. Here, we review several technical considerations with the goal of increasing efficiency and improving outcomes with the 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Endplate-specific fusion rate 1 year after surgery for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF)

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

Implant nonfusion is an important prognostic factor for patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This study aimed to investigate endplate-specific pseudarthrosis after ACDF, to determine if the rate of fusion is inferior in the lower endplate, and to identify any differences in clinical and radiological results. Research comparing each endplate on which the endplate affects nonfusion is limited.

METHODS

We analyzed 71 patients with 142 total spinal levels who underwent double-level ACDF (C4-5-6 and C5-6-7) with an allograft and plate at our hospital between January 2012 and December 2018. Fusion grades were assessed using computed tomography and the Bridwell fusion grade system at 1 year postoperatively. Radiological parameters were obtained from lateral cervical radiographs collected preoperatively and at 1 month and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no difference in fusion between the C4-5-6 and C5-6-7 ACDF procedures, but the fusion rate and Bridwell fusion grade at the caudal surgery level were lower than those at the cranial surgery level (93 vs. 79%, p < 0.001). The lower endplate of the caudal fusion level showed the most common pseudarthrosis (18 of 71 [25%]). There was no difference in radiological parameters and clinical outcomes between the fusion and pseudarthrosis groups.

CONCLUSION

In double-level ACDF procedures, the nonfusion rate was higher at the caudal fusion levels, especially at the lower endplates of the caudal fusion levels.

Soft Cervical Orthosis Use Does Not Improve Fusion Rates After One-Level and Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To determine if postoperative soft cervical orthosis use affects arthrodesis rates on a per-level or construct basis after 1-level and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Electronic medical records were queried for 1-level and 2-level primary ACDF between 2016 and 2019 at a single academic center. Surgeons prescribed either a soft cervical orthosis or no orthosis. Pseudarthrosis rates were evaluated by dynamic cervical spine radiographs with arthrodesis defined by <1 mm of interspinous motion. Continuous and categorical data were compared using analysis of variance or χ2 tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine independent predictors of pseudarthrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 316 unique patients (504 instrumented levels) met the inclusion criteria. Eighty-four percent of patients were prescribed a soft cervical orthosis. Overall, arthrodesis occurred at 344 (80.9%) and 62 (78%) levels in patients with and without cervical orthosis, respectively. When evaluating patients placed in a cervical orthosis versus those who were not, there were no differences in pseudarthrosis or revision rates. Further, there were no differences in pseudarthrosis on a per-level basis. Further, cervical orthosis use was not an independent predictor of pseudarthrosis (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.57; P =0.623) on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative placement of soft cervical orthoses after 1-level or 2-level ACDF was not associated with improved arthrodesis or reduced rate of revision surgery.

What is the role of dynamic cervical spine radiographs in predicting pseudarthrosis revision following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Postoperative dynamic radiographs are used to assess fusion status after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with comparable accuracy to computed tomography (CT) scans.

PURPOSE

To (1) determine if dynamic radiographs accurately predict pseudarthrosis revision in a cohort of largely asymptomatic patients who underwent ACDF, (2) determine how adjacent segment motion is affected by fusion status, and (3) analyze how clinical outcomes differ between patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic pseudarthrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent primary one- to four-level ACDF at a single institution over a 10-year period.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Interspinous motion on preoperative and postoperative flexion-extension radiographs and preoperative and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale for Neck Pain (VAS Neck) and Arm Pain (VAS Arm), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA), Mental and Physical Component Scores of the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) Health Survey (MCS-12 and PCS-12) METHODS: The difference in spinous process motion between flexion and extension radiographs was used to determine motion at each level of the ACDF construct. Pseudarthrosis was defined as ≥ 1 mm spinous process motion on dynamic radiographs. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to predict the probability of surgical revision for pseudarthrosis based on millimeters of interspinous motion at each instrumented level. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used to assess the effect of pseudarthrosis on clinical outcomes. Alpha was set at p<.05.

RESULTS

A total of 597 patients met inclusion criteria including 1,203 ACDF levels. Of those, 215 patients (36.0%) were diagnosed with a pseudarthrosis on dynamic radiographs with 29 patients (4.9%) requiring pseudarthrosis revision. ROC analysis identified a "cutoff" value of 1.00 mm of interspinous process motion for generating an optimal area under the curve (AUC). The negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.6%, whereas the positive predictive value (PPV) was 13.7%. When analyzing adjacent segment motion, the Δ supra-adjacent interspinous process motion (ISM) was significantly lower for patients with a superior construct pseudarthrosis (-1.06 mm vs. 1.80 mm, p<.001), whereas the Δ infra-adjacent level ISM was significantly lower for patients with an inferior construct pseudarthrosis (-1.21 mm vs. 2.15 mm, p<.001). Patients with a pseudarthrosis not requiring revision had worse postoperative NDI (29.3 vs. 23.4, p=.027), VAS Neck (3.40 vs. 2.63, p=.012), and VAS Arm (3.09 vs. 1.85, p=.001) scores at 3 months, but not 1-year, compared with patients who were fused. Patients requiring pseudarthrosis revision had higher 1-year postoperative NDI (38.0 vs. 23.7, p=.047) and lower 1-year postoperative Δ VAS Arm (-0.22 vs. -2.97, p=.016) scores.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year postoperative dynamic radiographs have a greater than 99% negative predictive value for identifying patients requiring pseudarthrosis revision, but they have a low positive predictive value. Most patients with a pseudarthrosis remain asymptomatic with similar 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes compared with patients without a pseudarthrosis.

Predictive nomogram of cage nonunion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study in a spine surgery center

The cage nonunion may cause serious consequences, including recurrent pain, radiculopathy, and kyphotic deformity. The risk factors for nonunion following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are controversial. The aim of the study is to investigate the risk factors for nonunion in cervical spondylotic cases after ACDF. We enrolled 58 and 692 cases in the nonunion and union group respectively and followed up the cases at least 6 months. Patient demographic information, surgical details, cervical sagittal parameters, and the serum vitamin D level were collected. A logistic regression was performed to determine the independent predictors for nonunion, which were used for establishing a nomogram. In order to estimate the reliability and the net benefit of nomogram, we applied a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, calibration curves and plotted decision curves. Using the multivariate logistic regression, we found that age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.16, P < .001), smoking (OR = 3.41, P = .001), angle of C2 to C7 (OR = 1.53, P < .001), number of operated levels (2 levels, OR = 0.42, P = .04; 3 levels, OR = 1.32, P = .54), and serum vitamin D (OR = 0.81, P < .001) were all significant predictors of nonunion (Table 3). The area under the curve of the model training cohort and validation cohort was 0.89 and 0.87, respectively. The calibration curves showed that the predicted outcome fitted well to the observed outcome in the training cohort (P = .102,) and validation cohort (P = .125). The decision curves showed the nomogram had more benefits than the All or None scheme if the threshold probability is >10% and <100% in training cohort and validation cohort. We found that age, smoking, angle of C2 to C7, number of operated levels, and serum vitamin D were all significant predictors of nonunion.

Comparison of Fusion vs Nonunion After 4-Level and 5-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion With Anterior Plate Fixation

BACKGROUND

Nonunion remains a concern in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), yet there are limited data on nonunion after 4 to 5-level ACDF. In fact, the largest series on 4-level or 5-level ACDF focused specifically on the swallowing outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess nonunion after 4 to 5-level ACDF.

METHODS

Forty-one patients treated with 4 to 5-level ACDF with minimum of 12-month radiographic follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Nonunion was found in 25 patients (61%) and 42 levels (25%) and complete fusion in 16 (39%) patients and 126 levels (75%). The 2 groups were further compared.

RESULTS

One-level nonunion was by far the most common pattern compared with multilevel nonunion. Nonunion occurred more frequently at the caudal than the cranial or middle segments (P < .0001). There were significantly more subsidence (P < .0001) and screw fractures/pullouts (P < .0001) in the nonunion compared with the fusion group. The symptomatic patients were significantly younger than the asymptomatic patients (P = .044). The symptomatic levels were significantly more than asymptomatic levels (P = .048). Equal proportion of patients implanted with allograft and polyetheretherketone had nonunion. However, there were markedly more nonunion than fused levels with allograft and more fused than nonunion levels with polyetheretherketone (P = .023). The reoperation rate was 24.4% and mostly due to nonunion. There were no reoperations within 90 days of the primary surgery.

CONCLUSION

The nonunion rate for 4-level and 5-level ACDF may be higher than previously reported. Symptomatic nonunion remains a major reason for reoperation after multilevel ACDF. Baseline characteristics that negatively affect fusion may be obviated by careful patient selection.

Morphologic Change of CorticoCancellous Allograft Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical implications of graft morphologic changes in corticocancellous allografts used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), such as graft resorption or fracture.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although cortico-cancellous allograft is one of the most commonly used interbody spacer for ACDF, clinical implications of allograft resorption or fracture is unclear.

METHODS

One-hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for degenerative cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with allograft morphologic changes, including graft resorption and fracture (morphologic change group), were compared with patients without morphologic changes (unchanged group). Furthermore, operated segments with morphologic changes were compared with unchanged segments. Patient characteristics, cervical lordosis, segmental lordosis, fusion, subsidence, neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS), arm pain VAS, and neck disability index (NDi) scores were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (149 segments) were included in the study. Allograft resorption or fracture was detected in 46 (51.1%) patients and 81 (54.3%) segments, respectively. The fusion rate of morphologic change segments was significantly lower than that of the unchanged segments (P < 0.001). Furthermore, segments with morphologic changes had significantly higher rates of subsidence compared to unchanged segments ( P < 0.001). Segmental lordosis at the final follow-up was significantly smaller in the morphologic change segments ( P < 0.001). Neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI scores did not demonstrate significant intergroup differences.

CONCLUSION

Corticocancellous allograft demonstrated a high rate of graft morphologic change (54.3%). Graft resorption or fracture was associated with increased pseudarthrosis, subsidence, and decreased postoperative segmental lordosis; however, the clinical results were not significantly affected. Caution is needed when choosing to use corticocancellous allografts for ACDF due to the high rate of graft resorption or fracture and the negative implications of these risks.

Pseudarthrosis of the Cervical Spine

Pseudarthrosis of the cervical spine represents a common and challenging problem for spine surgeons. Rates vary greatly from as low as 0%-20% to >60% and depend heavily on patient factors, approach, and number of levels. While some patients remain asymptomatic from pseudarthrosis, many require revision surgery due to instability, continued neck pain, or radiculopathy/myelopathy. We aimed to provide a practical, narrative review of cervical pseudarthrosis to address the following areas: (1) definitions, (2) incidence, (3) risk factors, (4) presentation and workup, (5) treatment decision-making, and (6) postoperative care. It is our hope the current review provides a concise summary for how to diagnose and treat challenging cervical nonunions.

Biomechanical Study of Cervical Endplate Removal on Subsidence and Migration in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Study Design

This study compares four cervical endplate removal procedures, validated by finite element models.

Purpose

To characterize the effect of biomechanical strength and increased contact area on the maximum von Mises stress, migration, and subsidence between the cancellous bone, endplate, and implanted cage.

Overview of Literature

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been widely used for treating patients with degenerative spondylosis. However, no direct correlations have been drawn that incorporate the impact of the contact area between the cage and the vertebra/endplate.

Methods

Model 1 (M1) was an intact C2C6 model with a 0.5 mm endplate. In model 2 (M2), a cage was implanted after removal of the C4-C5 and C5-C6 discs with preservation of the osseous endplate. In model 3 (M3), 1 mm of the osseous endplate was removed at the upper endplate. Model 4 (M4) resembles M3, except that 3 mm of the osseous endplate was removed.

Results

The range of motion (ROM) at C2C6 in the M2-M4 models was reduced by at least 9º compared to the M1 model. The von Mises stress results in the C2C3 and C3C4 interbody discs were significantly smaller in the M1 model and slightly increased in the M2-M3 and M3-M4 models. Migration and subsidence decreased from the M2-M3 model, whereas further endplate removal increased the migration and subsidence as shown in the transition from M3 to M4.

Conclusions

The M3 model had the least subsidence and migration. The ROM was higher in the M3 model than the M2 and M4 models. Endplate preparation created small stress differences in the healthy intervertebral discs above the ACDF site. A 1 mm embedding depth created the best balance of mechanical strength and contact area, resulting in the most favorable stability of the construct.

Diagnosis of reoperated cervical non-union: Multicenter retrospective study about 45 patients

INTRODUCTION

Non-union is one of the main complications of single- or multi-level cervical spine fusion, considerably impairing functional results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the respective contributions of imaging examinations in the diagnostic process, the challenge being to avoid inappropriate surgery and unnecessary complementary examinations.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A retrospective multicenter study included all patients managed for cervical spine non-union between 2008 and 2018. We evaluated the imaging examinations performed on each patient and determined signs of non-union in each image.

RESULTS

The study included 45 patients in 4 centers: 55% female; mean age, of 48±8.0 years; 57% smokers. Systematic static radiography showed signs of non-union in 55% of cases. Dynamic X-ray was performed in 34% of patients, and showed hypermobility of the level in 80% of cases. CT supported diagnosis of non-union in 97% of cases, and MRI in 48%. SPECT-CT was positive in all cases of non-union.

DISCUSSION

Dynamic X-ray is rarely prescribed, but frequently provided an objective measure of hypermobility of the level in non-union, justifying first-line use. Millimetric-slice CT was reliable for diagnosis. MRI is relevant only once diagnosis has been made, as part of preoperative work-up. Nuclear imaging can be useful in order to solve doubtful cases.

CONCLUSION

In suspected cervical spine non-union, we recommend dynamic X-rays (flexion/extension) and CT-scan as first-line diagnosis examinations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Combining Expandable Interbody Cage Technology With a Minimally Invasive Technique to Harvest Iliac Crest Autograft Bone to Optimize Fusion Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the rate of fusion associated with an expandable cage and iliac crest bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MI-TLIF is a commonly performed procedure, but challenges inherent in MI-TLIF technique can make achieving an interbody fusion difficult.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients treated with an MI-TLIF for degenerative lumbar pathology. Patients that completed patient-reported outcome measures and 1-year computed tomography (CT)-scans for fusion analysis were included. Fusion morphology was analyzed by evaluating CT scans for location of bridging trabecular bone in relation to the cage. Patients with bridging bone were considered fused. Preoperative and postoperative health-related quality of life scores were compared. A Kolmogrov-Smirnoff test was used to determine normality of health-related outcome scores. A Friedman 2-way analysis of variance by ranks with pairwise comparisons to determine statistical significance of differences between the date of a follow-up examination and preoperative examination was done.

RESULTS

Of 75 patients evaluated 23 patients were excluded due to loss to follow-up, adjacent segment degeneration, inability to obtain a CT scan, or reoperation for nonfusion related symptoms. Of 61 disk spaces that were included, 55 had bridging bone through the intervertebral cage, resulting in an overall fusion rate of 90.2%. There was a higher rate of fusion at L5-S1 as compared to L4-L5. There was mean improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-12 Physical Component Score, Visual Analog Scale Back/Leg pain, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function. There were no complications associated with iliac crest bone graft harvesting.

CONCLUSION

Combining an expandable cage with iliac crest autograft bone harvested through a minimally invasive technique can allow for improved fusion rates without graft-site complications in MI-TLIF surgery.

Structural Allograft Versus Synthetic Interbody Cage for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes From a National Database

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 1-year perioperative complications between structural allograft (SA) and synthetic cage (SC) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a national database.

METHODS

The TriNetX Research Network was retrospectively queried. Patients undergoing initial single or multilevel ACDF surgery between October 1, 2015 and April 30, 2019 were propensity score matched based on age and comorbidities. The rates of 1-year revision ACDF surgery and reported diagnoses of pseudoarthrosis, surgical site infection (SSI), and dysphagia were compared between structural allograft and synthetic cage techniques.

RESULTS

A comparison of 1-year outcomes between propensity score matched cohorts was conducted on 3056 patients undergoing single-level ACDF and 3510 patients undergoing multilevel ACDF. In single-level ACDF patients, there was no difference in 1-year revision ACDF surgery (P = .573), reported diagnoses of pseudoarthrosis (P = .413), SSI (P = .620), or dysphagia (P = .529) between SA and SC groups. In multilevel ACDF patients, there was a higher rate of revision surgery (SA 3.8% vs SC 7.3%, odds ratio = 1.982, P < .001) in the SC group, and a higher rate of dysphagia in the SA group (SA 15.9% vs SC 12.9%).

CONCLUSION

While the overall revision and complication rate for single-level ACDF remains low despite interbody graft selection, SC implant selection may result in higher rates of revision surgery in multilevel procedures despite yielding lower rates of dysphagia. Further prospective study is warranted.

Residual Motion and Graft Type Do Not Influence Patient-reported Outcomes Following One- or Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of graft type on residual motion and the relationship among residual motion, smoking, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although most patients develop solid fusion based on static imaging following ACDF, dynamic imaging has revealed that many patients continue to have residual motion at the arthrodesis.

METHODS

Forty-eight participants performed dynamic neck flexion/extension and axial rotation within a biplane radiography system 1 year following ACDF (21 one-level, 27 two-level). PRO scores included the Short Form-36, Neck Disability Index, and Cervical Spine Outcomes Questionnaire. An automated model-based tracking process matched subject-specific bone models to the biplane radiographs with sub-millimeter accuracy. Residual motion was measured across the entire arthrodesis site for both one- and two-level fusions in patients who received either allograft or autograft. Patients were divided into "pseudarthrosis" (>3° of flexion/extension residual motion) and "solid fusion" groups. Residual motion and PROs were compared between groups using Student t tests.

RESULTS

Patients who received allograft showed more total flexion/extension residual motion (4.1° vs. 2.8°, P = 0.12), although this failed to reach significance. No differences were noted in PROs based on graft type (all P > 0.08) or the presence of pseudarthrosis (all P > 0.13). No differences were noted in residual motion between smokers and nonsmokers (all P > 0.15); however, smokers who received allograft reported worse outcomes than nonsmokers who received allograft and smokers who received autograft.

CONCLUSION

Allograft may result in slightly more residual motion at the arthrodesis site 1 year after ACDF. However, there is minimal evidence that PROs are adversely affected by slightly increased residual motion, suggesting that the current definition of pseudarthrosis correlates poorly with clinically significant findings. Additionally, autograft appears to result in superior outcomes in patients who smoke.Level of Evidence: 2.

Fusion and subsidence rates of vertebral body sliding osteotomy: Comparison of 3 reconstructive techniques for multilevel cervical myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) was previously reported as a technique to decompress spinal canal by translating the vertebral body anteriorly and is indicated for cervical myelopathy caused by spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. However, little is known about its fusion and subsidence rates.

PURPOSE

To compare the fusion and subsidence rates of VBSO, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred sixty-eight patients who underwent VBSO, ACDF, or ACCF for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and were followed-up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Fusion and subsidence rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck pain, neck disability index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were assessed.

METHODS

Results of the VBSO, ACDF, and ACCF groups were compared using Student's t-test and chi-square test.

RESULTS

The fusion rate at 1-year postoperatively and the final follow-up for VBSO was 92.9% (37/42). VBSO demonstrated a higher 1-year fusion rate than ACDF (77.9% [74/95], p=0.04) and ACCF (74.2% [23/31], p=0.04). However, the fusion rate at the final follow-up did not demonstrate significant difference. The mean amount of subsidence (ACDF group, 1.5±1.2 mm; VBSO group, 1.5±1.5 mm; p=1.00) and rate of significant subsidence of > 3 mm (ACDF group, 13.7% [13/95]; VBSO group, 14.3% [6/42]; p=1.00) were similar for ACDF and VBSO. Furthermore, the mean amount of subsidence in VBSO was significantly less than that in ACCF (1.5±1.5 mm vs 2.4±2.0 mm; p=0.04). Neck pain VAS, NDI, and JOA scores were not significantly different among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

VBSO demonstrated faster solid union than ACDF and ACCF, although the fusion rates at the final follow-up were similar. VBSO resulted in less subsidence than ACCF at the 1-year follow-up. VBSO could be applied safely when the shape and/or location of the pathologic foci and sagittal alignment favor its application without much concern for pseudarthrosis or subsidence.

Pseudarthrosis rate following anterior cervical discectomy with fusion using an allograft cellular bone matrix: a multi-institutional analysis

OBJECTIVE

The use of osteobiologics, engineered materials designed to promote bone healing by enhancing bone growth, is becoming increasingly common for spinal fusion procedures, but the efficacy of some of these products is unclear. The authors performed a retrospective, multi-institutional study to investigate the clinical and radiographic characteristics of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion performed using the osteobiologic agent Osteocel, an allograft mesenchymal stem cell matrix.

METHODS

The medical records across 3 medical centers and 12 spine surgeons were retrospectively queried for patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with the use of Osteocel. Pseudarthrosis was determined based on CT or radiographic imaging of the cervical spine. Patients were determined to have radiographic pseudarthrosis if they met any of the following criteria: 1) lack of bridging bone on CT obtained > 300 days postoperatively, 2) evidence of instrumentation failure, or 3) motion across the index level as seen on flexion-extension cervical spine radiographs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed to identify independent preoperative or perioperative predictors of pseudarthrosis in this population.

RESULTS

A total of 326 patients met the inclusion criteria; 43 (13.2%) patients met criteria for pseudarthrosis, of whom 15 (34.9%) underwent revision surgery. There were no significant differences between patients with and those without pseudarthrosis, respectively, for patient age (54.1 vs 53.8 years), sex (34.9% vs 47.4% male), race, prior cervical spine surgery (37.2% vs 33.6%), tobacco abuse (16.3% vs 14.5%), chronic kidney disease (2.3% vs 2.8%), and diabetes (18.6% vs 14.5%) (p > 0.05). Presence of osteopenia or osteoporosis (16.3% vs 3.5%) was associated with pseudarthrosis (p < 0.001). Implant type was also significantly associated with pseudarthrosis, with a 16.4% rate of pseudarthrosis for patients with polyetherethereketone (PEEK) implants versus 8.4% for patients with allograft implants (p = 0.04). Average lengths of follow-up were 27.6 and 23.8 months for patients with and those without pseudarthrosis, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated osteopenia or osteoporosis (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.51-16.4, p < 0.01) and usage of PEEK implant (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.04-4.83, p = 0.04) as independent predictors of pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who underwent single-level ACDF, rates of pseudarthrosis associated with the use of the osteobiologic agent Osteocel are higher than the literature-reported rates associated with the use of alternative osteobiologics. This is especially true when Osteocel is combined with a PEEK implant.

Comparison between selective caudal fixed screw construct and all variable screw construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

This retrospective comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of selective caudal fixed screw constructs with all variable screw constructs in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Thirty-five patients who underwent surgery using selective caudal fixed screw construct (SF group) were compared with 44 patients who underwent surgery using all variable constructs (AV group). The fusion rate, subsidence, adjacent level ossification development (ALOD), adjacent segmental disease (ASD), and plate-adjacent disc space distance were assessed. The one-year fusion rates assessed by computed tomography bone bridging and interspinous motion as well as the significant subsidence rate did not differ significantly between the AV and SF groups. The ALOD and ASD rates and plate-adjacent disc space distances did not significantly differ between the two groups at both the cranial and caudal adjacent levels. The number of operated levels was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis in the logistic regression analysis. The stability provided by the locking mechanism of the fixed screw did not lead to an increased fusion rate at the caudal level. Therefore, the screw type should be selected based on individual patient’s anatomy and surgeon’s experience without concern for increased complications caused by screw type.

Cage-screw and anterior plating combination reduces the risk of micromotion and subsidence in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion-a finite element study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely used to treat patients with spinal disorders, where the cage is a critical component to achieve satisfactory fusion results. However, it is still not clear whether a cage with screws or without screws will be the best choice for long-term fusion as the micromotion (sliding distance) and subsidence (penetration) of the cage still take place repeatedly.

PURPOSE

This study aims to examine the effect of cage-screws on the biomechanical characteristics of the human spine, implanted cage, and associate hardware by comparing the micromotion and subsidence.

STUDY DESIGN

A finite element (FE) analysis study.

METHODS

A FE model of a C3-C5 cervical spine with ACDF was developed. The spinal segment was modeled with the removal of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL), posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL), and discectomy was then implanted with a cage-screw system. Three models were analyzed: the first was the original spine (S1 model), the second, S2, was implanted with cages and anterior plating, and the third, S3, was implanted with a cage-screw system in addition to the anterior plate. All investigations were under 1 N•m in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation situations.

RESULTS

Finite element analysis (FEA) demonstrated that range of motion (ROM) at C3-C4 in the S2 model was significantly reduced more than that in the S3 model, while the ROM at both C4-C5 in the S3 model was reduced more than that in the S2 model in all simulations. The ROM at C3-C5 in the S1 model was reduced by over 5° in the S2 and S3 models in all loading conditions. The micromotion and subsidence at all contacts of C3-C5 in the S3 model were lower than that in the S2 model in all flexion, extension, bending, and axial simulations. The subsidence and micromotion could be seen in the barrier area of the S2 model, while they occurred near the edge of the screw in the S3 model.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed that the cage-screw and anterior plating combination has promising potential to reduce the risk of micromotion and subsidence of implanted cages in two or more level ACDFs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of double segmental fixation with cage-screw anterior plating combination constructs may increase the stiffness of the construct and reduce the incidence of clinical and radiographic pseudarthrosis following multilevel ACDF, which in turn, could decrease the need for revision surgeries or supplemental posterior fixation.

Comparison Between Three- and Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

We compared the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone primary 3- or 4-level ACDF were retrospectively identified. The demographic data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected through a review of the medical records. PROM surveys were administered preoperatively for baseline measurements and at 1 year postoperatively. The surveys included the Neck Disability Index, 12-item short-form physical component summary, 12-item short-form mental component summary, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain. The cervical sagittal alignment parameters included C2-C7 lordosis, segmental lordosis, the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and the T1 slope. Multivariate regression models were used to compare the changes in the PROMs and radiographic measurements over time between 3- and 4-level ACDF. Correlation coefficients were calculated to compare the delta scores for the PROMs and radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

The VAS scores for neck and arm pain had significantly improved from baseline in both cohorts. Only the 3-level group showed significant improvements perioperatively in the Neck Disability Index and 12-item short-form physical component summary. No significant differences were found in the improvement in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. The pooled results demonstrated a significant negative correlation between the perioperative changes in segmental lordosis and VAS scores for arm pain. A significant negative correlation was also found between the perioperative changes in the SVA and 12-item short-form mental component summary and VAS scores for neck pain. C2-C7 lordosis significantly increased postoperatively only in the 3-level ACDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing both 3- and 4-level ACDF experienced significant clinical improvement without significant differences between the 2 groups. The radiographic measures of segmental lordosis and SVA also correlated with the changes in clinical outcomes.

Synthetic Cages Associated With Increased Rates of Revision Surgery and Higher Costs Compared to Allograft in ACDF in the Nonelderly Patient

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare all-cause reoperation rates and costs in nonelderly patients treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with structural allograft versus synthetic cages for degenerative pathology.

Methods

We queried a private claims database to identify adult patients (≤ 65 years) who underwent single-level ACDF in a hospital setting using either structural allograft or a synthetic cage (polyetheretherketone, metal, or hybrid device), from 2010 to 2016. The rate of all-cause reoperations at 2 years were compared between the 2 groups. Index hospitalization costs and 90-day complication rates were also compared. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 26,754 patients were included in the study. 11,514 patients (43%) underwent ACDF with structural allograft and 15,240 (57%) underwent ACDF with a synthetic cage. The patients in the allograft group were younger and more likely to be male. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to 90-day complications including: wound dehiscence, dysphagia, dysphonia, and hematoma/seroma. In the 2-year postoperative period, the synthetic cage group had a significantly higher rate of allcause reoperation compared to the allograft group (9.1% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.002). Index hospitalization costs were significantly higher in the synthetic cage group compared to those in the allograft group ($23,475 vs. $20,836, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Structural allograft is associated with lower all-cause reoperation rates and lower index costs in nonelderly patients undergoing ACDF surgery for degenerative pathology. It is important to understand this data as we transition toward value-based care.

Fate of Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Following Anterior Cervical Fusion: Progression of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy or Laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

In the treatment of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)-induced cervical myelopathy, laminoplasty (LMP) is the most widely used surgical procedure. However, the progression of ossification masses is a well-known complication of LMP. This study aimed to investigate whether the novel anterior cervical decompression technique (vertebral body sliding osteotomy; VBSO) based on anterior column fusion suppresses the progression of OPLL compared with motion-preserving posterior decompression surgery (LMP).

METHODS

All 77 consecutive patients (VBSO group, n = 33; LMP group, n = 44) who underwent VBSO or LMP for cervical OPLL at our institute between January 2012 and November 2017 were included. A total of 62 and 86 cervical motion segments in the VBSO and LMP groups were investigated, respectively. The OPLL thickness was measured twice (immediate postoperative and final follow-up), and the change of OPLL thickness was compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The increase in OPLL thickness in the VBSO group (-0.18 ± 0.24 mm) was significantly smaller than that in the LMP group (1.0 ± 0.9 mm, P < 0.001). Interestingly, in some patients, suppressed OPLL progression and decreased OPLL thickness were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The solid fusion of the anterior column by VBSO is associated with the lower incidence of OPLL growth and potential for growth arrest.

Anterior bone loss after cervical disc replacement: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Anterior bone loss (ABL) is a relatively easily neglected condition after cervical disc replacement (CDR). Whether this phenomenon is a radiological anomaly or a complication remains controversial. Several studies have reported the clinical characteristics of ABL and speculated on the pathogenic mechanism based on a certain type of artificial disc, while the overall understanding of ABL is lacking.

AIM

To describe the prevalence, impacts, and risk factors of ABL after CDR.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Excerpta Medica databases using the terms “bone loss” or “bone remodeling” or “bone absorption” or “osteolysis” or “implant loosening” or “implant migration” or “hypersensitivity” or “hyperreactivity”, “cervical disc replacement” or “cervical disc arthroplasty” or “total disc replacement”. Eligible manuscripts on the prevalence and impacts of ABL were reviewed by the authors. Data extraction was performed using an established extraction form. The results of the included studies were described narratively.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. One was a prospective study and the others were retrospective studies. A total of 440 patients with 536 segments were included. The artificial cervical discs included Bryan, Baguera-C, Discocerv, and Mobi-C. The prevalence of ABL ranged from 3.13% to 91.89%, with a combined overall prevalence of 41.84%. ABL occurred within 6 mo and stopped 12 mo after surgery. Several cases were noted to have a self-healing process. Severe ABL resulted in segmental kyphosis, implant subsidence, and persistent neck pain. ABL may be related to heterotopic ossification. Multilevel surgery may be one of the risk factors for ABL.

CONCLUSION

ABL is a common condition after CDR. The underlying mechanisms of ABL may include stress concentration and injury to nutrient vessels. ABL should be considered a complication after CDR as it was associated with neck pain, implant subsidence, and heterotopic ossification.

Does screw length for primary two-level ACDF influence pseudarthrosis risk?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pseudarthrosis remains a major complication for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF; 0%-15% at 1-year follow-up). Potentially modifiable risk factors are known in literature, such as smoking and osteoporosis. Biomechanical studies suggest that plates with locking screws can enhance the fixation rigidity and pull-out strength. Although longer screws are known to be correlated with increased pull-out strength, deeper screw depths can increase the risk for intraoperative complications. An important factor that has yet to be studied is the minimum screw length relative to the diameter of the vertebral body (VB) necessary to achieve successful fusion. In this study, we hypothesize that screws with shorter depths relative to the VB will increase the risk for radiographic pseudarthrosis and result in poor patient reported outcomes (PROs).

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of ACDF screw length on pseudarthrosis risk.

STUDY DESIGN

A review of prospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 85 patients were included in this study. The mean age ±standard deviation was 58.9±10.3 and 42.4% of patients were female. The mean follow-up was 21.6±8.3 months.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The neck disability index (NDI) was used to assess PROs up to 2-years after surgery. For each ACDF level, the screw length and VB% (screw length divided by the anterior-posterior VB diameter) were measured. Radiographic pseudarthrosis (interspinous motion [ISM] ≥1 mm) was recorded at 6-weeks, 6-months, and 1-year for each patient. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) for ISM ≥ 1mm were measured for different VB% thresholds. A VB% of <75% was found to have the highest PPV (93%) and NPV (70%) for radiographic pseudarthrosis. This threshold of <75% was then assessed in our bivariate and multivariate analyses.

METHODS

We reviewed a database (2015-2018) of adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent a primary two-level ACDF with or without corpectomy. All ACDF constructs involved fixed angle screws. The minimum follow-up period was 1 year. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine if screw VB% was an independent risk factor for radiographic pseudarthrosis.

RESULTS

By 1-year, overall fusion success was achieved in 92.9% of patients. The 1-year revision rate was 4.7%. Patients with any screw VB% <75% had substantially worse fusion success (64.3%) than those who did not (98.6%) at 1-year. The VB% <75% increased the risk for radiographic pseudarthrosis at every follow up period. In comparison to other time-points, patients with radiographic pseudarthrosis at 6 weeks had significantly worse NDI scores by 2-years (p=.047). The independent risk factors for radiographic pseudarthrosis at 6-weeks included any screw VB% <75% (OR 77, p<.001), prior/current smoker (OR 6.8, p=.024), and corpectomy (OR 0.1, p=.010). Patients with ISM≥1 mm had a higher rate of revision surgery at 1-year (5.9% vs. 3.9%), but this was not statistically significant (p=.656).

CONCLUSIONS

In primary two-level ACDF, VB% <75% is significantly associated with increased ISM (≥1 mm) at all time points for this study. As an intraoperative guide, spine surgeons can use the screw VB% threshold of <75% to avoid unnecessarily short screws. This threshold can be easily measured pre- and intraoperatively, and has been found to be strongly correlated to radiographic pseudarthrosis in the early postoperative period.

Long-Term Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Patients With Absence of Radiographic Union at 2 Years After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term radiographic and functional outcomes of patients in whom there is absence of radiographic union at 2 years after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were evaluated at standard postoperative time intervals per index trial protocol. Plain film radiographic fusion criteria at the arthrodesis level was defined as interspinous motion (ISM) <1 mm with corresponding motion at a non-arthrodesed superjacent level ISM ≥4 mm. Radiographs and functional outcome measures were acquired at each follow-up visit. Delayed union was defined as lack of radiographic union by 24 months.

RESULTS

Nine patients demonstrated radiographic evidence of delayed radiographic union at 24 months. Of those 9 patients, 5 patients demonstrated evidence of union during the follow-up period to 72 months. Despite the absence of radiographic union based on our criteria, 3 of the 4 remaining patients reported remarkable improvements in pain scores and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The natural history of delayed union at 24 months after ACDF was still favorable despite the prolonged delay in union. The majority of patients (5 of 9) without radiographic union at 24 months did proceed to radiographic union by final follow-up. In addition, patients that did not meet our criteria for fusion maintained postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcome scores. In summary, our study patients undergoing a single-level ACDF with asymptomatic radiographic delayed union at 24 months can expect maintained improvements in postoperative patient-reported outcomes scores and can still progress to successful radiographic fusion.

Outcomes of Revision Surgery for Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Fusion: Case Series and Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Case series/systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To report on patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion for symptomatic pseudarthrosis following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and to assess outcomes reporting in the literature.

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusion for pseudarthrosis after primary ACDF from 2013 to 2018 by a single surgeon were reviewed consecutively. Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) arm/neck were recorded at preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year time points. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and outcomes reporting was recorded.

RESULTS

NDI scores were 54.4 (SD 19.1), 36.6 (SD 18.1), and 41.2 (SD 19.2) at preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year time points, respectively, with improvement from preoperatively to 6 months (P = .004). VAS neck scores were 8.1 (SD 1.3), 5.0 (SD 2.9), and 5.8 (SD 2.2) at preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year time points, respectively, with improvement from preoperatively to 6 months (P = .038). VAS arm scores were 5.1 (SD 4.1), 3.5 (SD 3.2), and 3.6 (SD 2.7) at preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year time points, respectively, with improvement although these did not reach statistical significance (P = .145). The most common subjective outcomes reported in the literature were general symptoms assessments (43%), ordinal scales (43%), and VAS neck (19%) scales, with the majority of studies (67%) documenting one measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate clinically meaningful improvement within the first 6 months after posterior fusion for pseudarthrosis. Studies demonstrate substantial variability and no standardization in outcomes reporting, limiting the ability to compare results across interventions and pathologies. Standardized reporting will enable comparisons to inform patients and physicians on the optimal approach to treat this difficult problem.

Asymptomatic ACDF Nonunions Underestimate the True Prevalence of Radiographic Pseudarthrosis

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of subjects in the control anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) arm of Medtronic Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) trials for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

OBJECTIVES

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with radiographic nonunion to patients with a solid fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The true prevalence of nonunion after ACDF is unknown. Nonunion may be under-reported, as some patients are not symptomatic enough to justify radiographic evaluation.

METHODS

Three hundred forty-five subjects enrolled in the control arm of IDE trials for CDA who had single-level ACDF with allograft and plate with 24 month data formed the study cohort. Using the 24-month postop evaluation, subjects were divided into those who had radiographic fusion and those who did not using strict study criteria. SF-36, NDI, Neck and Arm pain NRS scores were reported at 12, 24, 36, 60, and 84 months postop. For subjects who had secondary surgery failures, the last observations before the secondary surgery were carried forward to future visits for the analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four (13%) patients had radiographic nonunion and 301 (87%) were fused at 24 months postop. At 24 months, PROs were similar between the two groups. Seven patients in the Nonunion group (16%) and 10 (3%) in the Fused group had additional surgery at the index level prior to the 24 follow-up (P = 0.003). Over the 84-month follow-up a total of 9 patients in the Nonunion group (21%) and 22 (7%) in the Fused group had additional surgery at the index level (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

While the radiographic nonunion rate at 24 months was 13%, PROs show that many of the radiographic nonunions were asymptomatic. Although the majority of patients with radiographic nonunion did not undergo additional surgery, the rate of secondary surgeries at the index level was significantly higher in the radiographic nonunion group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications after 1-2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures

Background

Postoperative complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) have a significant impact on clinical outcomes and health care resource use. Identifying predictive factors for complications after ACDF may allow for the modification of care protocols to mitigate complication risk. The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors for the incidence of medical and surgical complications up to 2 years postoperatively after ACDF procedures.

Methods

A prospectively maintained surgical registry of patients who underwent primary, 1-2-level ACDF was retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of medical and surgical complications up to 2 years postoperatively was determined. Patients were classified according to demographic, comorbidity, and procedural characteristics. Bivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to determine if an association existed between the incidence of medical or surgical complications and patient characteristics. A final multivariate model including all patient and procedural characteristics as controls was created using backwards, stepwise regression until only those variables with P < .05 remained.

Results

A total of 310 patients were included. Upon bivariate analysis, age >50 years was identified as a risk factor for medical complications after ACDF procedures. Additionally, bivariate analysis identified ageless Charlson comorbidity index ≥2, operative duration >60 minutes, and 2-level procedures as risk factors for surgical complications after ACDF. Upon multivariate analysis, age >50 years was identified as an independent risk factor for medical complications (relative risk [RR] = 3.6, P = .005), while operative time >60 minutes was identified as an independent risk factor for surgical complications after ACDF (RR = 4.5, P = .017).

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that older age and longer operative time were independent risk factors for medical and surgical complications, respectively, following ACDF. Patients with these risk factors should be counseled regarding their increased risk of postoperative complications and should undergo more vigilant monitoring to aid in complication avoidance.

Level of Evidence

3.

Clinical Relevance

Surgeons should consider the elevated risk of postoperative complications in >50 years old patients and >60 min procedures.

The Utility of Cervical Spine Bracing As a Postoperative Adjunct to Multilevel Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Background

Use of cervical bracing/collar subsequent to anterior cervical spine discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is variable. Outcomes data regarding bracing after ACDF are limited. Here, we study the impact of bracing on short-term outcomes related to safety, quality of care, and direct costs in multilevel ACDF.

Methods

Retrospective cohort analyses of all consecutive patients undergoing multilevel ACDF with or without bracing from 2013 to 2017 was undertaken (n = 616). Patient demographics and comorbidities were analyzed. Tests of independence and logistic regressions were used to assess differences in length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (home, assisted rehabilitation facility [ARF], or skilled nursing facility [SNF]), quality-adjusted life year (QALY), direct cost, readmission within 30 days, and emergency room (ER) visits within 30 days.

Results

Amongst the study population, 553 were braced and 63 were not braced. There was no difference in comorbidities (P > .05) such as obesity, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and problem list number. A significant difference in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was found, with more ASA 2 patients in the braced cohort and more ASA 3 patients in the unbraced cohort (P = .007). LOS was extended for the unbraced group (median 156.9 ± 211.4 versus 86.67 ± 130.6 h, P = .003), and ER visits within 30 days were 0.21 times less likely in the braced group (P = .006). There was no difference in readmission (P = .181), QALY gain (P = .968), and direct costs (P = .689).

Conclusion

Bracing following multilevel cervical fixation does not alter short-term postoperative course or reduce the risk for early adverse outcomes in a significant manner.

Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan-based criteria compared with surgical exploration for the analysis of cervical fusion and nonunion

OBJECTIVE

Computed tomography (CT) scans are accepted as the imaging standard of reference to define union after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, ideal CT criteria to diagnose union have not been identified or validated. The objective of this study was to analyze the diagnostic value of 9 CT-based criteria and identify the ideal criteria among them to assess cervical fusion after ACDF using surgical exploration as the standard of reference.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective radiographic study of a single surgeon's prospective assessment of osseous fusion during cervical revision surgery by analyzing complete radiographic data in 44 patients who underwent anterior cervical revision surgery due to symptomatic suspected nonunion or adjacent level disease. All patients received standard preoperative CT scans, which were assessed by an independent radiologist to evaluate 9 diagnostic criteria for osseous union. During revision surgery, scar tissue was removed and manual segmental translation tests were performed. Nonunion was defined by visualized motion at the treated ACDF level.

RESULTS

In total, 44 patients were included in the study (30 men; patient age 54 ± 6 years, BMI 28 ± 5 kg/m2). For analysis of fusion, 75 cervical levels were explored, of which 61 levels (81%) showed intraoperative movement indicating nonunion. Statistical analysis showed that of the 9 parameters used to diagnose bone union, "bridging bone on ≥ 3 CT slices" yielded the highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (58%). Multivariate analysis revealed that prediction accuracy was not increased if several criteria were combined to determine fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that the best indicator of bone union was the item bridging bone on ≥ 3 CT slices. Combining the scoring of more than one criterion did not increase the diagnostic accuracy.

Complications of anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

The anterior approach to the cervical spine is commonly utilized for a variety of degenerative, traumatic, neoplastic, and infectious indications. While many potential complications overlap with those of the posterior approach, the distinct anatomy of the anterior neck also presents a unique set of hazards. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the etiology, presentation, natural history, and management of these complications. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a PubMed search was conducted to evaluate clinical studies and case reports of patients who suffered a complication of anterior cervical spine surgery. The search specifically included articles concerning adult human subjects, written in the English language, and published from 1989 to 2019. The PubMed search yielded 240 articles meeting our criteria. The overall rates of complications were as follows: dysphagia 5.3%, esophageal perforation 0.2%, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy 1.3%, infection 1.2%, adjacent segment disease 8.1%, pseudarthrosis 2.0%, graft or hardware failure 2.1%, cerebrospinal fluid leak 0.5%, hematoma 1.0%, Horner syndrome 0.4%, C5 palsy 3.0%, vertebral artery injury 0.4%, and new or worsening neurological deficit 0.5%. Morbidity rates in anterior cervical spine surgery are low. Nevertheless, the unique anatomy of the anterior neck presents a wide variety of potential complications involving vascular, aerodigestive, neural, and osseous structures.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Affects Pseudarthrosis Rates and Influences Patient-Reported Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort review.

OBJECTIVES

Cervical pseudarthrosis is a frequent cause of need for revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and may lead to worse patient-reported outcomes. The effect of proton pump inhibitors on cervical fusion rates are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients taking PPIs have higher rates of nonunion after ACDF.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review was performed to compare patients who were taking PPIs preoperatively with those not taking PPIs prior to ACDF. Patients younger than 18 years of age, those with less than 1-year follow-up, and those undergoing surgery for trauma, tumor, infection, or revision were excluded. The rates of clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis and radiographic pseudarthrosis were compared between PPI groups. Patient outcomes, pseudarthrosis rates, and revision rates were compared between PPI groups using either multiple linear or logistic regression analysis, controlling for demographic and operative variables.

RESULTS

Out of 264 patients, 58 patients were in the PPI group and 206 were in the non-PPI group. A total of 23 (8.71%) patients were clinically diagnosed with pseudarthrosis with a significant difference between PPI and non-PPI groups (P = .009). Using multiple linear regression, PPI use was not found to significantly affect any patient-reported outcome measure. However, based on logistic regression, PPI use was found to increase the odds of clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis (odds ratio 3.552, P = .014). Additionally, clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis negatively influenced improvement in PCS-12 scores (P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use was found to be a significant predictor of clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis following ACDF surgery. Furthermore, clinically diagnosed pseudarthrosis negatively influenced improvement in PCS-12 scores.

PEEK interbody devices for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: association with more than 6-fold higher rates of pseudarthrosis compared to structural allograft

OBJECTIVE

Common interbody graft options for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) include allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). PEEK has gained popularity due to its radiolucent properties and a modulus of elasticity similar to that of bone. PEEK devices also result in higher billing costs than allograft, which may drive selection. A previous study found a 5-fold higher rate of pseudarthrosis with the use of PEEK devices compared with structural allograft in single-level ACDF. Here the authors report on the occurrence of pseudarthrosis with PEEK devices versus structural allograft in patients who underwent multilevel ACDF.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 81 consecutive patients who underwent a multilevel ACDF and had radiographic follow-up for at least 1 year. Data were collected on age, sex, BMI, tobacco use, pseudarthrosis, and rate of reoperation for pseudarthrosis. Logistic regression was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients, 35 had PEEK implants and 46 had structural allograft. There were no significant differences between age, sex, smoking status, or BMI in the 2 groups. There were 26/35 (74%) patients with PEEK implants who demonstrated radiographic evidence of pseudarthrosis, compared with 5/46 (11%) patients with structural allograft (p < 0.001, OR 22.2). Five patients (14%) with PEEK implants required reoperation for pseudarthrosis, compared with 0 patients with allograft (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reinforces previous findings on 1-level ACDF outcomes and suggests that the use of PEEK in multilevel ACDF results in statistically significantly higher rates of radiographic pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery than allograft. Surgeons should consider these findings when determining graft options, and reimbursement policies should reflect these discrepancies.

Is the bone fusion affected by Modic-2 changes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

To explore the impact of Modic changes (MCs) on bone fusion after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a zero-profile implant (the Zero-P implant system).From November 2014 to November 2017, a total of 116 patients who underwent single-level ACDF with the Zero-P implant were divided into two groups according to MRI showing type 2 MCs (MC2) or no MCs (i.e., the MC2 group and the NMC group, respectively). A total of 92 (79.3%) patients were classified into the NMC group, and 24 (20.7%) patients were classified into the MC2 group. The clinical outcomes and fusion rates were retrospectively evaluated between the 2 groups preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months, and the final follow-up.The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of neck pain were significantly improved compared to the preoperative scores in both the NMC and MC2 groups (P < .05). However, there were no differences in JOA or VAS scores between the 2 groups (P > .05). The fusion rates of the NMC and MC2 groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and the final follow-up were 33.7% and 12.5%, 77.2% and 54.2%, 89.1% and 87.5%, and 97.8% and 95.8%, respectively. The fusion rates were significantly lower at 3 and 6 months after surgery in the MC2 group than in the NMC group (P < .05).The presence of MC2 did not affect the clinical outcome but delayed the fusion time following ACDF with the Zero-P implant system.Level of Evidence is Level 3.

The Effect of Tobacco Use on Postoperative Pain Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the differences in inpatient pain scores, narcotic consumption, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between tobacco users and nonusers following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have investigated tobacco use as a risk factor for negative postsurgical outcomes following spine surgery; however, few studies have analyzed the effects of tobacco on pain following ACDF.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary, 1-level, or 2-level ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by tobacco use at the time of surgery. Inpatient pain scores and narcotic consumption were collected. Neck Disability Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck and arm pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up visits. Differences in demographics and perioperative characteristics were assessed using χ analysis and multivariate linear regression. An association between immediate postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and long-term PROs was tested for using multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients were included and stratified by tobacco use: tobacco (n=25) and nontobacco (n=167). There were no significant differences in demographic and perioperative characteristics. No statistical differences were observed in inpatient VAS pain scores and narcotic consumption on postoperative day 0 and postoperative day 1. Preoperative VAS neck pain and arm pain was greater in tobacco users, however, improvements in neck and arm pain were similar in the postoperative period through 6-month follow-up. In addition, no statistical differences in Neck Disability Index were observed preoperatively or at any postoperative time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that tobacco use does not influence inpatient pain scores, narcotic consumption, and improvements in PROs following ACDF. As such, tobacco users and nonusers should receive similar postoperative pain management protocols following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Quality of Life and Cost Implications of Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and its Subsequent Revision Surgery

BACKGROUND

More than 120,000 anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs) are performed annually. Pseudarthrosis is a potential delayed adverse event that affects up to 33% of patients. The degree to which this adverse event affects both patient quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and health care costs is poorly understood.

METHODS

Patients who underwent revision surgery for pseudarthrosis between 2007 and 2012 were identified and matched to controls not experiencing pseudarthrosis in a 1:2 fashion (case/control). Cases and controls were compared regarding total health care costs incurred in the year after the index ACDF and QOL outcomes on the following metrics: EuroQol Five-Dimensions Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Pain Disability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 738 patients who underwent ACDF, 11 underwent surgery for pseudarthrosis. No differences were noted between cases and controls regarding any of the matched variables. Patients in the pseudarthrosis cohort had poorer postoperative scores on the EuroQol Five-Dimensions Questionnaire mobility, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and quality-adjusted life-year dimensions. In addition, 64% of patients with pseudarthrosis had worsened quality-adjusted life-year scores compared with only 9% of controls (P < 0.01). Patients with pseudarthrosis also had poorer mental health (P < 0.01) and pain disability outcomes (P < 0.01) than did controls. Pseudarthrosis was associated with significant increases in direct costs, direct postoperative costs, and total costs (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to characterize the effect of surgical revision for pseudarthrosis on both QOL outcomes and care costs after ACDF. Patients requiring revision experienced significantly poorer QOL outcomes and higher care costs relative to controls.

Is allograft a more reliable treatment option than autograft in 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation?

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of allograft in 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate fixation by comparing its clinical and radiological outcomes to those of autograft.Thirty five patients with femur cortical allografts and 32 patients with tricortical iliac autografts were evaluated. All surgeries were performed by a single senior surgeon. During routine follow-up (at 3 months, 6 months, and annually after the surgery), the fusion rate, subsidence rate, and fused segmental lordosis angle were assessed by radiologic evaluation. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI) scores, and Odom criteria. This study was conducted using the results of the 2-year postoperative follow-up.Among 67 patients, 62 (92.5%) showed successful bone fusion at 2 years postoperatively: 91.4% (32/35) in the allograft group and 93.8% (30/32) in the autograft group. The fusion rate was 37.1% (13/35) in the allograft group and 68.8% (23/32) in the autograft group at 6 months and 68.5% (24/35) in the allograft group and 93.8% (30/32) in autograft group at 1 year. Eight (72.7%) of the remaining 11 patients with allograft achieved bone fusion without any intervention at the 2-year follow-up. The fusion was achieved faster in the autograft group than in the allograft group (P = .003). There was no significant difference in the subsidence rate or change in the fused segmental lordosis angle between the 2 groups; there was also no significant difference in clinical outcomes (NDI scores, VAS scores, Odom criteria) between the 2 groups. However, the intraoperative blood loss was significantly greater in the autograft group, and the operative time was also significantly longer in the autograft group (P < .001). In the autograft group, 6 patients (18.8%) had minor complications at the donor site.In 2-level ACDF with plate fixation, the radiologic and clinical outcomes of autograft and allograft were similar at 2-year follow-up, although fusion was observed earlier in the autograft group.