Evaluation of a Combination of Waveform Amplitude and Peak Latency in Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring

Variability of somatosensory evoked potential and motor evoked potential change criteria in thoracic spinal decompression surgery based on preoperative motor status

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Combined somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential (SSEP and MEP) changes for predicting prognosis in thoracic spinal surgery have been variably reported.

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the validity of combined SSEP and MEP for predicting postoperative motor deficits (PMDs) in thoracic spinal decompression surgery (TSDS) and identify a relatively optimal neurophysiological predictor of PMDs in patients based on preoperative motor status.

STUDY SETTING

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 475 patients were analyzed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A reduction in muscle strength by more than or equal to one manual muscle testing (MMT) grade postoperatively compared with the preoperative MMT grade was identified as PMDs. Postoperative motor deficits were detected by comparing the preoperative and postoperative physical examination findings in short- and long-term follow-up visits.

METHODS

All patients were divided into two subgroups according to preoperative motor status. The following data were collected: (1) demographic data; (2) IONM (intraoperative neuromonitoring) data; and (3) postoperative motor outcomes. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of IONM change to predict PMDs. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to establish optimal IONM warning criteria.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients had severe preoperative motor deficits (Group S), and 377 patients did not (Group N). MEP and SSEP change was effective for predicting PMDs in the short term (p<.01) and long term (p<.01) for TSDS patients. In Group N, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 65% in SSEP amplitude and 89.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Furthermore, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were durations of change of 24.5 minutes for SSEP and 32.5 minutes for MEP. In Group S, however, the cutoff values for predicting PMDs in the short term were a decrease of 36.5% in SSEP amplitude and 59.5% in MEP amplitude of the baseline value. Moreover, the critical values for predicting short-term PMDs were durations of change of 16.5 minutes for SSEP and 17.5 minutes for MEP.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal IONM changes for prediction vary depending on preoperative motor status. Combined SSEP and MEP are excellent for predicting PMDs in TSDS.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Diagnosis of Intraoperative Neurological Decline in the Setting of Spinal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to prevent intraoperative neurological injury during spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has increased significantly in recent years. Using IONM, spinal cord function can be evaluated intraoperatively by recording signals from specific nerve roots, motor tracts, and sensory tracts. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to evaluate the efficacy of IONM among patients undergoing spine surgery for any indication.

METHODS

The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS for all studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyography (EMG), either on their own or in combination (multimodal). Studies were included if they reported raw numbers for True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN), False Positives (FP) and True Negative (TN) either in a 2 × 2 contingency table or in text, and if they used postoperative neurologic exam as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the overall efficacy of each modality type using a bivariate model adapted by Reitsma et al, for all spine surgeries and for individual disease groups and regions of spine. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

A total of 163 studies were included; 52 of these studies with 16,310 patients reported data for SSEP, 68 studies with 71,144 patients reported data for MEP, 16 studies with 7888 patients reported data for EMG and 69 studies with 17,968 patients reported data for multimodal monitoring. The overall sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC for SSEP were 71.4% (95% CI 54.8-83.7), 97.1% (95% CI 95.3-98.3), 41.9 (95% CI 24.1-73.1) and .899, respectively; for MEP, these were 90.2% (95% CI 86.2-93.1), 96% (95% CI 94.3-97.2), 103.25 (95% CI 69.98-152.34) and .927; for EMG, these were 48.3% (95% CI 31.4-65.6), 92.9% (95% CI 84.4-96.9), 11.2 (95% CI 4.84-25.97) and .773; for multimodal, these were found to be 83.5% (95% CI 81-85.7), 93.8% (95% CI 90.6-95.9), 60 (95% CI 35.6-101.3) and .895, respectively. Using the QUADAS-2 ROB analysis, of the 52 studies reporting on SSEP, 13 (25%) were high-risk, 10 (19.2%) had some concerns and 29 (55.8%) were low-risk; for MEP, 8 (11.7%) were high-risk, 21 had some concerns and 39 (57.3%) were low-risk; for EMG, 4 (25%) were high-risk, 3 (18.75%) had some concerns and 9 (56.25%) were low-risk; for multimodal, 14 (20.3%) were high-risk, 13 (18.8%) had some concerns and 42 (60.7%) were low-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that all neuromonitoring modalities have diagnostic utility in successfully detecting impending or incident intraoperative neurologic injuries among patients undergoing spine surgery for any condition, although it is clear that the accuracy of each modality differs.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023384158.

The Utility of Transcranial Stimulated Motor-Evoked Potential Alerts in Cervical Spine Surgery Varies Based on Preoperative Motor Status

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in cervical spine surgery and identify factors associated with positive predictive value when Tc-MEP alerts are occurred.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The sensitivity and specificity of Tc-MEP for detecting motor paralysis are high; however, false-positives sometimes occur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors examined Tc-MEP in 2476 cases of cervical spine surgeries and compared patient backgrounds, type of spinal disorders, preoperative motor status, surgical factors, and the types of Tc-MEP alerts. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% from the control waveform. Tc-MEP results were classified into two groups: false-positive and true-positive, and items that showed significant differences were extracted by univariate analysis and detected by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity was 66% (segmental paralysis: 33% and lower limb paralysis: 95.8%) and specificity was 91.5%. Tc-MEP outcomes were 33 true-positives and 233 false-positives. Positive predictive value of general spine surgery was significantly higher in cases with a severe motor status than in a nonsevere motor status (19.5% vs . 6.7%, P =0.02), but not different in high-risk spine surgery (20.8% vs . 19.4%). However, rescue rates did not significantly differ regardless of motor status (48% vs . 50%). In a multivariate logistic analysis, a preoperative severe motor status [ P =0.041, odds ratio (OR): 2.46, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.03-5.86] and Tc-MEP alerts during intradural tumor resection ( P <0.001, OR: 7.44, 95% CI: 2.64-20.96) associated with true-positives, while Tc-MEP alerts that could not be identified with surgical maneuvers ( P =0.011, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.073-0.71) were associated with false-positives.

CONCLUSION

The utility of Tc-MEP in patients with a preoperative severe motor status was enhanced, even in those without high-risk spine surgery. Regardless of the motor status, appropriate interventions following Tc-MEP alerts may prevent postoperative paralysis.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy: Neuroradiological, neurophysiological and clinical correlations in 27 consecutive cases

•

New insight into prognostic factors for recovery of clinical function following posterior decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

•

An increase of IOM amplitude of at least 50% coupled with preoperative T2-only and diffuse T2 signal changes on MRI is a positive prognostic factors for clinical improvement 6 months after surgery.

•

Clinical improvement at 6 months follow-up can be expected in patients with T1 hypo intensity if a diffuse border of the lesion on T2 images is present.

Characteristics of Tc-MEP Waveforms in Spine Surgery for Patients with Severe Obesity

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate transcranial motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) waveform monitoring in spinal surgery for patients with severe obesity.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spine surgeries in obese patients are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Intraoperative Tc-MEP monitoring can identify neurologic deterioration during surgery, but has not been examined for obese patients.

METHODS

The subjects were 3560 patients who underwent Tc-MEP monitoring during spine surgery at 16 centers. Tc-MEPs were recorded from multiple muscles via needle or disc electrodes. A decrease in Tc-MEP amplitude of ≥70% from baseline was used as an alarm during surgery. Preoperative muscle weakness with manual muscle test (MMT) grade ≤4 was defined as a motor deficit, and a reduction of one or more MMT grade postoperatively was defined as deterioration.

RESULTS

The 3560 patients (1698 males, 47.7%) had a mean age of 60.0 ± 20.3 years. Patients with body mass index >35 kg/m2 (n = 60, 1.7%) were defined as severely obese. Compared with all other patients (controls), the rates of preoperative motor deficit (41.0% vs. 29.6%, P < 0.05) and undetectable baseline waveforms in all muscles were significantly higher in the severely obese group (20.0% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.01). Postoperative motor deterioration did not differ significantly between the groups. The sensitivity and specificity of the alarm criterion for prediction of postoperative neurologic complications were 75.0% and 83.9% in severely obese patients and 76.4% and 89.6% in controls, with no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Tc-MEPs can be used in spine surgery for severely obese cases to predict postoperative motor deficits, but the rate of undetectable waveforms is significantly higher in such cases. Use of a multichannel waveform approach or multiple modalities may facilitate safe completion of surgery. Waveforms should be carefully evaluated and an appropriate rescue procedure is required if the alarm criterion occurs.Level of Evidence: 3.

Effects of Preoperative Motor Status on Intraoperative Motor-evoked Potential Monitoring for High-risk Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) baseline characteristics of lower limb muscles and to determine the accuracy of Tc-MEPs monitoring based on preoperative motor status in surgery for high-risk spinal disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neurological complications are potentially serious side effects in surgery for high-risk spine disease. Intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) using Tc-MEPs waveforms can be used to identify neurologic deterioration, but cases with preoperative motor deficit tend to have poor waveform derivation.

METHODS

IONM was performed using Tc-MEPs for 949 patients in high-risk spinal surgery. A total of 4454 muscles in the lower extremities were chosen for monitoring. The baseline Tc-MEPs was recorded immediately after exposure of the spine. The derivation rate was defined as muscles detected/muscles prepared for monitoring. A preoperative neurological grade was assigned using the manual muscle test (MMT) score.

RESULTS

The 949 patients (mean age 52.5 ± 23.3 yrs, 409 males [43%]) had cervical, thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar lesions at rates of 32%, 40%, 26%, and 13%, respectively. Preoperative severe motor deficit (MMT ≤3) was present in 105 patients (11%), and thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) was the most common disease in these patients. There were 32 patients (3%) with no detectable waveform in any muscles, and these cases had mostly thoracic lesions. Baseline Tc-MEPs responses were obtained from 3653/4454 muscles (82%). Specificity was significantly lower in the severe motor deficit group. Distal muscles had a higher waveform derivation rate, and the abductor hallucis (AH) muscle had the highest derivation rate, including in cases with preoperative severe motor deficit.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk spinal surgery, Tc-MEPs collected with multi-channel monitoring had significantly lower specificity in cases with preoperative severe motor deficit. Distal muscles had a higher waveform derivation rate and the AH muscle had the highest rate, regardless of the severity of motor deficit preoperatively.Level of Evidence: 3.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Intervention Following Transcranial Motor-evoked Potentials Alert During Posterior Decompression and Fusion Surgery for Thoracic Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study of the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intervention after an alert in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) during surgery for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

T-OPLL is commonly treated with posterior decompression and fusion with instrumentation. IONM using Tc-MEPs during surgery reduces the risk of neurological complications.

METHODS

The subjects were 79 patients with a Tc-MEP alert during posterior decompression and fusion surgery for T-OPLL. Preoperative muscle strength (manual muscle testing [MMT]), waveform derivation rate at the start of surgery (baseline), intraoperative waveform changes; and postoperative motor paralysis were examined. A reduction in MMT score of ≥1 on the day after surgery was classified as worsened postoperative motor deficit. An alert was defined as a decrease in Tc-MEP waveform amplitude of ≥70% from baseline. Alerts were recorded at key times during surgery.

RESULTS

The patients (35 males, 44 females; age 54.6 years) had OPLL at T1-4 (n = 27, 34%), T5-8 (n = 50, 63%), and T9-12 (n = 16, 20%). The preoperative status included sensory deficit (n = 67, 85%), motor deficit (MMT ≤4) (n = 59, 75%), and nonambulatory (n = 26, 33%). At baseline, 76 cases (96%) had a detectable Tc-MEP waveform for at least one muscle, and the abductor hallucis had the highest rate of baseline waveform detection (n = 66, 84%). Tc-MEP alerts occurred during decompression (n = 47, 60%), exposure (n = 13, 16%), rodding (n = 5, 6%), pedicle screw insertion (n = 4, 5%), posture change (n = 4, 5%), dekyphosis (n = 2, 3%), and other procedures (n = 4, 5%). After intraoperative intervention, the rescue rate (no postoperative neurological deficit) was 57% (45/79), and rescue cases had a significantly better preoperative ambulatory status and a significantly higher baseline waveform derivation rate.

CONCLUSION

These results show the efficacy of intraoperative intervention following a Tc-MEP alert for prevention of neurological deficit postoperatively.Level of Evidence: 2.

Feasibility of adjunct facial motor evoked potential monitoring to reduce the number of false-positive results during cervical spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

False-positive intraoperative muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP) monitoring results due to systemic effects of anesthetics and physiological changes continue to be a challenging issue. Although control MEPs recorded from the unaffected side are useful for identifying a true-positive signal, there are no muscles on the upper or lower extremities to induce control MEPs in cervical spine surgery. Therefore, this study was conducted to clarify if additional MEPs derived from facial muscles can feasibly serve as controls to reduce false-positive mMEP monitoring results in cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at the authors' institution who did not experience postoperative neurological deterioration were retrospectively studied. mMEPs were induced with transcranial supramaximal stimulation. Facial MEPs (fMEPs) were subsequently induced with suprathreshold stimulation. The mMEP and subsequently recorded fMEP waveforms were paired during each moment during surgery. The initial pair was regarded as the baseline. A significant decline in mMEP and fMEP amplitude was defined as > 80% and > 50% decline compared with baseline, respectively. All mMEP alarms were considered false positives. Based on 2 different alarm criteria, either mMEP alone or both mMEP and fMEP, rates of false-positive mMEP monitoring results were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included in this study, corresponding to 102 pairs of mMEPs and fMEPs. This included 23 initial and 79 subsequent pairs. Based on the alarm criterion of mMEP alone, 17 false-positive results (21.5%) were observed. Based on the alarm criterion of both mMEP and fMEP, 5 false-positive results (6.3%) were observed, which was significantly different compared to mMEP alone (difference 15.2%; 95% CI 7.2%-23.1%; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

fMEPs might be used as controls to reduce false-positive mMEP monitoring results in cervical spine surgery.

Optimal stimulation intensity for Br(E)-MsEP waveform derivation at baseline in pediatric spinal surgery

OBJECTIVES

Br(E)-MsEP monitoring is widely used in spinal surgery for detection of spinal cord injury. However, Br(E)-MsEP waveform derivation requires high-intensity stimulation, and this raises a concern of adverse effects due to the immature corticospinal tract in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal stimulation intensity required for derivation of Br(E)-MsEP waveforms at baseline in pediatric spinal surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The subjects were 85 pediatric patients (4-15 years old, mean age at surgery: 11.1 years old) who were treated with spinal surgery using a posterior only approach under Br(E)-MsEP monitoring. The main diagnoses were adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (n = 44), syndromic and neuromuscular scoliosis (n = 23), and congenital scoliosis (n = 12). A total of 1513 muscles in the lower extremities were chosen for monitoring.

RESULTS

A baseline waveform was obtained in all 85 cases and baseline Br(E)-MsEP responses were obtained from 1437/1513 muscles (95%). The mean stimulation intensity for baseline waveform derivation was 156.4 mA (range: 100-200 mA), and the stimulation intensity was significantly correlated with age (p < 0.05). The mean stimulation intensities were 129 ± 12, 138 ± 20, and 167 ± 25 mA for children <5, 6 to 10, and 11 to 15 years old, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There are no criteria for derivation of Br(E)-MsEP waveforms in pediatric patients undergoing spinal surgery. The stimulation intensity increased with age, and starting at a lower stimulation strength than that used in adults is appropriate for younger children.