Radiological Evaluation of Craniocervical Region in Patients with Basilar Invagination

Feasibility of C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation With the "in-out-in" Technique for Patients With Basilar Invagination

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of C2 pedicle screw fixation with the "in-out-in" technique in patients with basilar invagination (BI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The "in-out-in" technique is a fixation technique in which the screw enters the vertebrae through the parapedicle. The technique has been used in upper cervical spine fixation. However, anatomic parameters associated with the application of this technique in patients with BI are unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured the C2 pedicle width (PW), the distance between the vertebral artery (VA) and the transverse foramen (VATF), the safe zone, and the limit zone. The lateral safe zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the VA (LPVA/MPVA), and the medial safe zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the dura (MPD/LPD). The lateral limit zone is the sum of LPVA/MPVA and VATF (LPTF/MPTF), and the medial limit zone is the distance from the medial/lateral cortex of the C2 pedicle to the spinal cord (MPSC/LPSC). PW, LPVA, MPVA, and VATF were measured on the reconstructed CT angiography. PW, MPD, LPD, MPSC, and LPSC were measured on MRI. We define a width greater than 4 mm as safe for screw. The t -test was used to compare the parameters between male and female, left and right sides in all patients, and PW in CTA and MRI data in the same patient. For intrarater reliabilities, interclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients (49 CTA, 143 MRI) were included. The average PW, LPVA, MPVA, LPTF, MPTF, MPD, LPD, MPSC, and LPSC were 5.30 mm, 1.28 mm, 6.60 mm, 2.45 mm, 8.94 mm, 2.09 mm, 7.07 mm, 5.51 mm, and 10.48 mm, respectively. Furthermore, in patients with PW <4 mm, 53.6% of MPVA, 86.2% of LPTF, and all limit zones were larger than 4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BI, there is sufficient space medially and laterally to the C2 pedicle for partial screw encroachment to achieve "in-out-in" fixation, even if the pedicle is small.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-4.

Chamberlain's Line Violation in Basilar Invagination Patients Compared with Normal Subjects: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the measured odontoid tip violation above Chamberlain's line described in the literature to diagnose basilar invagination (BI) and to establish the normal placement of the dens tip defining individuals without BI (normal subjects).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical or radiological studies that expressed the amount of odontoid violation above Chamberlain's line in patients with a BI diagnosis. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate normal subjects' values of Chamberlain's line violation (CLV).

RESULTS

There were 23 studies included (13 radiological and 10 clinical). Most studies used computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Eight different cutoff values were used to measure dislocated odontoid apexes above Chamberlain's line regardless of the radiological modality. The mean measured amount of CLV was 3.95 mm (median 5 mm; range, 0-9 mm). The meta-analysis included 8 studies (1233 patients) with a normal sample population with a mean normal CLV of -0.63 mm (below the line) (95% confidence interval [-0.8, 1.18 mm], random effects model).

CONCLUSIONS

Different values were found in the assessed studies used for CLV in BI diagnosis. This variability is especially important for type B BI, as type A BI has other craniocervical diagnostic parameters. Considering the results obtained in this meta-analysis, BI should be diagnosed in the case of any dens violation >1.18 mm.

C1 Lateral Mass Screw Placement Through Endonasal Corridor for Purpose of O-C1 Fusion: Morphometric Analysis in Cadaveric Specimens

BACKGROUND

Odontoidectomy may pose some risks for O-C1 and/or C1-C2 instability, with previous authors reporting techniques for endonasal C1-C2 fusion. However, no technique for endonasal O-C1 fusion currently exists. We sought to describe the feasibility of endonasal anterior C1 (AC1) screw placement for endonasal O-C1 fusion.

METHODS

Seven adult cadaveric heads were studied for endonasal placement of 14 C1 screws. Using thin-cut computed tomography (CT)-based "snapshot" neuronavigation assistance, 4 mm x 22 mm screws were placed in the C1 lateral mass using a 0° driver. Post-placement CT scans were obtained to determine site-of-entry measured from C1 anterior tubercle, screw angulation in axial and sagittal planes, and screw proximity to the central canal and foramen transversarium.

RESULTS

Average site-of-entry was 16.57 mm lateral, 2.23 mm rostral, and 5.53 mm deep to the anterior-most portion of the C1 ring. Average axial angulation was 19.49° lateral to midline, measured at the C1 level. Average sagittal angulation was 13.22° inferior to the palatal line, measured from the hard palate to the opisthion. Bicortical purchase was achieved in 11 screws (78.6%). Partial breach of the foramen transversarium was observed in 2 screws (14.3%), violation of the O-C1 joint space in 1 (7.1%), and violation of the central canal in 0 (0%). Average minimum screw distances from the unviolated foramen transversaria and central canal were 1.97 mm and 4.04 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Navigation-assisted endonasal placement of AC1 screws is feasible. Additional studies should investigate the biomechanical stability of anterior C1 screw-plating systems, with anterior condylar screws as superior fixation point, compared to traditional posterior O-C1 fusion.

Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination

PURPOSE

To evaluate and describe the morphologic features of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination (BI) for informing the placement of pedicle screws. C2 pedicle screw placement is an important surgical technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability in patients with BI. However, no systematic and comprehensive anatomical study of the C2 pedicle in patients with BI has been reported.

METHODS

The data from 100 patients diagnosed with BI (BI group) and 100 patients without head or cervical disease (control group) were included in the study. Radiographic parameters, including the pedicle width, length, height, transverse angle, lamina angle, and superior angle, were measured and analyzed on CT images. After summary analysis, the effect of C2-3 congenital fusion on C2 pedicle deformity in patients with BI was also investigated.

RESULTS

The width, length, and height of the C2 pedicle of the BI patients were smaller than those of the control group. The pedicle cancellous bone was smaller in the BI group, while no significant difference in cortical bone was observed. In total, 44% of the pedicles were smaller than 4.5 mm in the BI group. Patients with C2-3 congenital fusion presented with smaller pedicle transverse angles and larger pedicle superior angles than those without fusion. Wide variations in the left and right angles of the pedicle were observed in the BI group with atlantoaxial dislocation or atlantooccipital fusion.

CONCLUSION

The C2 pedicle in the BI group was thinner than that in the control group due to a smaller cortical bone. Cases of C2-3 congenital fusion, atlantoaxial dislocation, and atlantooccipital fusion displayed variation in the angle of the C2 pedicle.

Morphological Evaluation of the Subaxial Cervical Spine in Patients with Basilar Invagination: A CT-based Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the morphologic features of the subaixal cervical spine in patients with basilar invagination (BI) and provide information for the accurate screw placement in this region.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

BI is a congenital anomaly, comprising a wide range of abnormal structures. The screw fixation can be required in situation that BI is combined with subaxial cervical spine pathologies. However, there are no literatures specifically addressed the subaxial cervical morphology of BI.

METHOD

A total of 42 BI patients were included in this retrospective study. Forty-two patients without head or cervical disease were matched for sexes and ages. Information on radiographic features of the subaxial cervical spine was collected and compared systematically.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the age and sex between the BI and control group. The BI group manifested a wider pedicle and laminar than the control group at all cervical levels, except for the pedicle of C6 and C7, and the laminar of C3 and C6. In addition, the BI group had a wider lateral mass from C3 to C5 than the control group. There were no differences in most measurements of the length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass.

CONCLUSION

BI patients have a wider pedicle and laminar than the general population in the subaxial cervical spine, but the same size in length of pedicle, laminar, and lateral mass.Level of Evidence: 4.

Anatomical analysis of the occipital bone in patients with basilar invagination: a computed tomography-based study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The occipital bone is often involved in the surgical treatment of basilar invagination (BI). However, the anatomy of the occipital bone associated with BI patients has yet to be investigated.

PURPOSE

To present a morphological map of the occipital bone in BI patients and help guide screw placement for occipitocervical fusion.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Radiological measurements of the occipital bone were performed on computed tomography images based on a matrix of 99 points centered around the external occipital protuberance (EOP) in a cohort of 50 BI patients and 50 cases with no head and cervical disease. The comparison between the BI group and the control group was assessed using Student t analysis and p<.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

All thicknesses measured from points of the matrix in the BI group were thinner than those in the control group (p<.05). The maximum thicknesses in both groups were located at the center of the EOP, which were 15.11±2.84 mm in the BI group and 17.56±3.03 mm in the control group, respectively. Additionally, thickness decreased with the distance away from the center of EOP.

CONCLUSIONS

The occipital bone in BI patients is thinner than that in the general population. A limited safe zone in BI patients is available for surgeons to place screws, which may need to be fully evaluated before operation.