Preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Assist in Predicting Early Postoperative Success in Lumbar Discectomy

Using PROMIS Scores to Provide Cost-Conscious Follow-up After Foot and Ankle Surgery

BACKGROUND

National campaigns in the United States, such as Choosing Wisely, emphasize that decreasing low-value office visits maximizes health care value. Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used to quantify postoperative outcomes, they have not been assessed as a tool to help guide clinicians consider alternatives or discontinue in-person follow-up visits. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency and cost of in-person follow-up visits after patients report substantial improvement defined as 2 consecutive improvements above preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores.

METHODS

Retrospective PROMIS PI data were obtained between 2015 and 2020 for common elective foot (n = 759) and ankle (n = 578) surgical procedures. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their preoperative PI score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate time to substantial improvement. Substantial improvement was defined as having 2 consecutive postoperative minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) above preoperative PROMIS PI scores. MCID was measured using the distribution-based method. Multivariable negative binomial models were used to determine the number of visits and direct associated costs after substantial improvement. The cost to payors was estimated using reimbursement rates.

RESULTS

Within 3 months, 12% to 46% of foot and 16% to 61% of ankle patients achieved substantial improvement. Results vary by preoperative pain quartile, with patients who report higher preoperative pain scores achieving earlier improvement. After achieving substantial improvement, foot and ankle patients averaged 3.60 and 4.01 follow-up visits during the remaining 9 months of the year. Visit costs averaged $266 and $322 per foot and ankle patient respectively.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative follow-up visits are time-consuming and costly. Physicians might consider objective measures, such as PROMIS PI, to determine the need, timing, and alternatives for in-person follow-up visits for elective foot and ankle surgeries after patients demonstrate reliable clinical improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study at a single institution.

Clinical Improvement After Lumbar Fusion: Using PROMIS to Assess Recovery Kinetics

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a single institution cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to identify features that predict delayed achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) following elective lumbar spine fusion using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative prediction of delayed recovery following lumbar spine fusion surgery is challenging. While many studies have examined factors impacting the achievement of MCID for patient-reported outcomes in similar cohorts, few studies have assessed predictors of early functional improvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing elective one-level posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on achievement of MCID for each respective PROMIS domain either before six months ("early responders") or after six months ("late responders") following surgical intervention. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine features associated with odds of achieving distribution-based MCID before or after six months follow up.

RESULTS

147 patients were included. The average age was 64.3±13.0 years. At final follow-up, 57.1% of patients attained MCID for PI and 72.8% for PF. However, 42 patients (49.4%) reached MCID for PI by six months, compared to 44 patients (41.1%) for PF. Patients with severe symptoms had the highest probability of attaining MCID for PI (OR 10.3; P =0.001) and PF (OR 10.4; P =0.001) Preoperative PROMIS symptomology did not predict early achievement of MCID for PI or PF. Patients who received concomitant iliac crest autograft during their lumbar fusion had increased odds of achieving MCID for PI (OR 8.56; P =0.001) before six months.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that the majority of patients achieved MCID following elective one-level lumbar spine fusion at long-term follow-up, although less than half achieved this clinical benchmark for each PROMIS metric by six months. We also found that preoperative impairment was not associated with when patients would achieve MCID. Further prospective investigations are warranted to characterize the trajectory of clinical improvement and identify the risk factors associated with poor outcomes more accurately.

The influence of preoperative Veterans RAND-12 physical composite score in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion [Retrospective Review]

No study has evaluated the preoperative impact of Veterans RAND-12 Physical Composite Score (VR-12 PCS) on anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) patients. This study examines its influence on physical function, mental health, pain, and disability outcomes. Two cohorts of ALIF patients with preoperative VR-12 PCS scores were formed using a single-surgeon registry: VR-12 PCS < 30 and VR-12 PCS ≥ 30. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected. PROMs of VR-12 PCS/Mental Composite Score (MCS), Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS/MCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale-Back/Leg Pain (VAS-BP/LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected pre/postoperatively up to 2-years. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and preoperative PROMs were compared. Intercohort postoperative 6-week/final PROMs and improvements were compared. Of 80 patients, there were 41 in the VR-12 PCS < 30 cohort. Besides VR-12 PCS, VR-12 PCS < 30 patients reported inferior preoperative VR-12 MCS/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF/PHQ-9/ODI scores (p ≤ 0.003, all). At 6-weeks postoperatively, VR-12 PCS < 30 reported inferior VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF/PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.030, all). There was greater improvement up to 6-weeks postoperatively in VR-12 PCS < 30 for VR-12 PCS/MCS and SF-12 PCS (p ≤ 0.020, all). VR-12 PCS < 30 reported superior improvement by final follow-up in VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS/PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.006, all). MCID achievement rates were higher in VR-12 PCS < 30 for PHQ-9 and ODI (p ≤ 0.013, both). VR-12 PCS < 30 patients reported inferior postoperative physical function, mental health, and disability, yet superior magnitude of improvement in physical function and mental health. Rates of clinically meaningful improvement for VR-12 PCS < 30 were greater in mental health and disability.

Association Between Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function With Postoperative Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine association between preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) scores with postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following single-level lumbar microdiscectomy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent single-level lumbar microdiscectomy were identified from May 2017-May 2020. Patients were grouped by their preoperative PROMIS-PF scores: mild disability (score≥40), moderate disability (score 30-39.9), and severe disability (score<30). Preoperative PROMIS-PF subgroups were tested for association with inpatient postoperative pain, total inpatient narcotics consumption, time to narcotic use cessation as well as improvements in postoperative PROMIS-PF, ODI, VAS-Leg Pain, VAS-Back Pain, SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS) at 2-, 6-, 12-weeks, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients were included. Patients with greater disability reported higher inpatient maximum Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores (P = .023) and total inpatient narcotics consumption (P = .008) but no difference in time to narcotic cessation after surgery (P = .373). However, patients with greater preoperative disability also demonstrated greater improvement from baseline in PROMIS-PF, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS at 2-week follow-up (P < .05). These higher improvements from baseline for patients with greater preoperative disability were sustained for PROMIS-PF, ODI, and VAS-Leg Pain at 2-year follow-up (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with greater preoperative disability, as measured by PROMIS-PF, had increased inpatient postoperative pain and narcotics consumption, but also higher improvement from baseline in long-term PROMs. This data can be utilized for patient counseling and setting expectations.

Pearls and pitfalls of PROMIS clinically significant outcomes in orthopaedic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed as a uniform and generalizable PROM system using item response theory and computer adaptive testing. We aimed to assess the utilization of PROMIS for clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) measurements and provide insights into its use in orthopaedic research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed PROMIS CSO reports for orthopaedic procedures via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to 2022, excluding abstracts and missing measurements. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and questionnaire compliance. PROMIS domains, CSO measures, and study populations were described. A meta-analysis compared distribution and anchor-based MCIDs in low-bias (NOS ≥ 7) studies.

RESULTS

Overall, 54 publications from 2016 to 2022 were reviewed. PROMIS CSO studies were observational with increasing publication rates. Evidence-level was II in 10/54, bias low in 51/54, and compliance ≥ 86% in 46/54. Most (28/54) analysed lower extremity procedures. PROMIS domains examined Pain Function (PF) in 44/54, Pain Interference (PI) in 36/54, and Depression (D) in 18/54. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported in 51/54 and calculated based on distribution in 39/51 and anchor in 29/51. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were reported in ≤ 10/54. MCIDs were not significantly greater than MDCs. Anchor-based MCIDs were greater than distribution based MCIDs (standardized mean difference = 0.44, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS CSOs are increasingly utilized, especially for lower extremity procedures assessing the PF, PI, and D domains using distribution-based MCID. Using more conservative anchor-based MCIDs and reporting MDCs may strengthen results. Researchers should consider unique pearls and pitfalls when assessing PROMIS CSOs.

Are We Considering the Whole Patient? The Impact of Physical and Mental Health on the Outcomes of Spine Care

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, observational.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of baseline health status on the physical and mental health (MH) outcomes of spine patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spine conditions can have a significant burden on both the physical and MH of patients. To date, few studies have evaluated the outcomes of both dimensions of health, particularly in nonoperative populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At their first visit to a multidisciplinary spine clinic, 2668 nonoperative patients completed the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) instrument and a questionnaire evaluating symptoms and goals of care. Patients were stratified by their baseline percentile score of the MH and physical health (PH) components of the PROMIS-GH. Four groups of patients were compared based on the presence or absence of bottom quartile PH or MH scores. The primary end point was the achievement of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the MH or PH components at follow-up. Multivariate regression assessed the predictors of MCID achievement.

RESULTS

After controlling for demographics, symptoms, and goals, each 1-point increase in baseline PROMIS-GH mental score reduced the odds of achieving MH MCID by 9.0% ( P <0.001). Conversely, each 1-point increase in baseline GH-physical score increased the odds of achieving MCID by 4.5% ( P =0.005). Each 1-point increase in baseline GH-physical score reduced the odds of achieving PH MCID by 12.5% ( P <0.001), whereas each 1-point increase in baseline GH-mental score increased the odds of achieving MCID by 5.0% ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Spine patients presenting with the lowest levels of physical or MH were most likely to experience clinically significant improvement in those domains. However, lower levels of physical or mental health made it less likely that patients would experience significant improvement in the alternative domain. Physicians should evaluate and address the complex spine population holistically to maximize improvement in both physical and mental health status.

Pain Interference Influence on Postoperative Clinical Trajectory in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression

OBJECTIVE

Newer Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) may offer benefits over legacy PROs in ease of administration and interpretation. We aim to study the influence of preoperative pain interference (PI) using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar decompression.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumbar decompression without fusion were separated into 2 cohorts: PROMIS-PI < 64 (lesser PI) and PROMIS-PI ≥ 64 (greater PI). PROs included PROMIS physical function, PROMIS anxiety (PROMIS-A), PROMIS sleep disturbance (PROMIS-SD), PROMIS-PI, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and were collected at preoperative and postoperative time points. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, PROs, and Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) were compared among groups through non-parametric inferential statistics.

RESULTS

One-hundred and seven patients were identified. Independent of preoperative PI, patients reported significant postoperative improvement in PROMIS physical function, PROMIS-A, PROMIS-PI, VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI. The greater PI cohort reported significant postoperative improvement in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and PROMIS-SD. The lesser PI cohort reported superior preoperative PROs in all domains. Postoperatively, the lesser PI cohort reported superior 6-week PROMIS-A and PROMIS-SD. MCID achievement rates were higher in the greater PI cohort for PROMIS-PI, VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower preoperative PI reported superior postoperative anxiety and sleep disturbance. Patients with greater preoperative PI had higher MCID achievement rates in PI, pain, and disability. Patients with greater preoperative PI undergoing lumbar decompression may demonstrate higher rates of clinically tangible improvement.

Evaluation of Clinical Recovery After Surgical Treatment for Hand Ischemia From Vasospastic and Occlusive Disease Using PROMIS

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature describing the recovery trajectory after surgery for upper extremity ischemia. Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression domains, we aimed to describe the postoperative recovery of such patients.

METHODS

We queried our PROMIS database for patients undergoing surgery for vasospastic or occlusive disease over a 4.5-year period. Inclusion criteria were preoperative, early (average 3 weeks) and late (average 6 months) postoperative PROMIS PF and/or UE, PI, and Depression scores. The change in PROMIS scores was calculated for each time point. Changes in PROMIS scores were compared with minimal clinically important difference estimates.

RESULTS

We identified 13 patients undergoing 13 surgical interventions that met inclusion criteria. More than one-half of our patients were men (n = 7 [54%]), and more than one-half of the surgeries (n = 7 [54%]) were for isolated occlusive diagnoses, with the remainder for vasospastic disease. At short-term postoperative follow-up, the change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores was -6.34 (SD: 9.13), -6.81 (SD: 9.61), 3.16 (SD: 5.78), and -3.05 (SD: 8.37), respectively. At mid-term postoperative follow-up, the change in PROMIS PF, UE, PI, and Depression scores was 4.45 (SD: 10.33), 8.04 (SD: 13.84), -7.03 (SD: 7.06), and -12.27 (SD: 10.85), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest patients undergoing surgical treatment for upper extremity ischemia experience a worsening of functional symptoms initially, as expected, followed by notable improvement.

Variability in recovery following microdiscectomy and postoperative physiotherapy for lumbar radiculopathy: A latent class trajectory analysis

OBJECTIVES

The clinical course of lumbar radiculopathy following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy varies substantially. No prior studies assessed this variability by deriving outcome trajectories. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the variability in long-term recovery after lumbar microdiscectomy followed by post-operative physiotherapy and to identify outcome trajectories. The secondary aim was to assess whether demographic, clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures routinely collected at baseline could predict poor outcome trajectories.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study with a 24-month follow-up. We included 479 patients with clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar radiculopathy confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings, who underwent microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy. Outcomes were leg pain and back pain measured with Visual Analogue Scales, and disability measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were performed to present the average and the individual clinical course. A latent class trajectory analysis was conducted to identify leg pain, back pain, and disability outcome trajectories. The best number of clusters was determined using the Bayesian Information Criterion, Akaike's information criteria, entropy, and overall interpretability. Prediction models for poor outcome trajectories were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Several outcome trajectories were identified. Most patients were assigned to the 'large improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 79.3%; back pain: 70.2%; disability: 59.5% of patients). Smaller proportions of patients were assigned to the 'moderate improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 7.9%; back pain: 10.6%; disability: 20.7% of patients), the 'minimal improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 4.9%, back pain: 6.7%, disability: 16.3% of patients) and the 'relapse' trajectory (leg pain: 7.9%; back pain: 12.5%; disability: 3.5%). Approximately one-third of patients (32.6%) belonged to one or more than one poor outcome trajectory. Patients with previous treatment (prior back surgery, injection therapy, and medication use) and those who had higher baseline pain and disability scores were more likely to belong to the poor outcome trajectories in comparison to the large improvement trajectories in back pain, leg pain and disability, and the moderate improvement trajectory in disability. The explained variance (Nagelkerke R2) of the prediction models ranged from 0.06 to 0.13 and the discriminative ability (Area Under the Curve) from 0.66 to 0.73.

CONCLUSION

The clinical course of lumbar radiculopathy varied following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy, and several outcome trajectories could be identified. Although most patients were allocated to favorable trajectories, one in three patients was assigned to one or more poor outcome trajectories following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy for lumbar radiculopathy. Routinely gathered data were unable to predict the poor outcome trajectories accurately. Prior to surgery, clinicians should discuss the high variability and the distinctive subgroups that are present in the clinical course with their patients.

Patient-Centered Goals After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between goal attainment and patient-reported outcomes in patients who engaged in a 6-session, telephone-based, cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy (CBPT) intervention after spine surgery.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis of a randomized trial, data from 112 participants (mean age = 63.3 [SD = 11.2] years; 57 [51%] women) who attended at least 2 CBPT sessions (median = 6 [range = 2-6]) were examined. At each session, participants set weekly goals and used goal attainment scaling (GAS) to report goal attainment from the previous session. The number and type of goals and percentage of goals met were tracked. An individual GAS t score was computed across sessions. Participants were categorized based on goals met as expected (GAS t score ≥ 50) or goals not met as expected (GAS t score < 50). Six- and 12-month outcomes included disability (Oswestry Disability Index), physical and mental health (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey), physical function (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), pain interference (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System), and back and leg pain intensity (numeric rating scale). Outcome differences over time between groups were examined with mixed-effects regression.

RESULTS

Participants set a median of 3 goals (range = 1-6) at each session. The most common goal categories were recreational/physical activity (36%), adopting a CBPT strategy (28%), exercising (11%), and performing activities of daily living (11%). Forty-eight participants (43%) met their goals as expected. Participants who met their goals as expected had greater physical function improvement at 6 months (estimate = 3.7; 95% CI = 1.0 to 6.5) and 12 months (estimate = 2.8; 95% CI = 0.04 to 5.6). No other outcome differences were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Goal attainment within a CBPT program was associated with 6- and 12-month improvements in postoperative physical functioning.

IMPACT

This study highlights goal attainment as an important rehabilitation component related to physical function recovery after spine surgery.

Impact of insurance type on patient-reported outcome measures in patients with lumbar disc herniation

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc herniations (LDH) are among the most common spinal conditions. Despite increased appreciation for the importance of social determinants of health, the role that these factors play in patients with lumbar disc herniations is poorly defined.

PURPOSE

To elucidate the association between insurance status and baseline patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the setting of lumbar disc herniations.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: Baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) were reviewed from 924 adult patients presenting for treatment of lumbar disc herniation within our institutional healthcare system (2015-2020).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, PROMIS Global-Physical, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were assessed.

METHODS

PROMIS scores at presentation were defined at the primary outcome and insurance status as the primary predictor. Differences in clinical and sociodemographic characteristics between our cohorts, stratified by insurance status, were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum or chi-squared testing. We used multivariable negative binomial regression modeling to adjust for potential confounders including age, gender, race, language, ethnicity, comorbidity index, and median geospatial household income.

RESULTS

We included 924 patients, with mean age of 58.4 +/- 15.2 years and 52.6% male prevalence. Patients insured through Medicaid were more likely to be Black, Hispanic, and non-English speaking patients compared with the commercially insured. The Charlson Comorbidity index was significantly higher in the Medicare group. Following adjusted analysis, patients with Medicaid insurance had significantly worse PF10a (IRR, 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96), as well as PROMIS Global-Physical score (IRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.94), and VAS low back pain (IRR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04-1.40) when compared to the commercially insured.

CONCLUSIONS

We encountered worse physical function, mental, and pain-related patient-reported outcomes for those with Medicaid insurance in a population of patients presenting for evaluation of lumbar disc herniation. These findings, including worse depression, anxiety, and higher axial back pain scores, merit further investigation into potential health system asymmetries, and should be accounted for by treating providers.

Patient Reported Outcomes in Metastatic Spine Disease: Concurrent Validity of PROMIS with the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression domains in comparison to the Spine Oncology Study Group-Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSG-OQ) in patients with metastatic spine disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

While there remains a significant movement toward incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into clinical care, there are few validated PROMs for patients with metastatic spine disease. The SOSG-OQ was designed and validated for metastatic spine tumor patients. However, the use of general symptom-based PROMs, such as PROMIS domains, may reduce both patient and physician burden and improve interdisciplinary care if shown to be concurrently valid.

METHODS

Metastatic spine tumor patients from January 2017 to July 2021 at a single academic medical center were asked to complete PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression domains and the SOSG-OQ. Spearman correlation (p) coefficients were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 103 unique visits, representing 79 patients met our inclusion criteria. A majority were men (59; 57%) and Caucasian (93; 90%), and the average age was 64-years-old (range: 34-87). There were 13 different types of histologies reported, with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer representing 28 (27%), 26 (25%), and 13 (13%), respectively. Additional cancers included renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, colon cancer, thyroid cancer, large B-cell lymphoma, nonHodgkin lymphoma, esophageal cancer, plasmacytoma, metastatic paraganglioma, and metastatic spindle cell sarcoma. SOSG-OQ was strongly correlated with PROMIS PI (ρ = 0.78) and PROMIS PF (ρ = 0.71), and moderately correlated with PROMIS Depression (ρ = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression appear to capture similar clinical insight as the SOSG-OQ. Spine surgeons can consider using these PROMIS domains in lieu of the SOSG-OQ in metastatic spine tumor patients.

Level of Evidence: NA.

Mismatch Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis is the Key Sagittal Plane Determinant of Patient Outcome at Minimum 40 Years After Instrumented Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Assess measures of spinal-pelvic balance in predicting functional outcome in patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at minimum 40-year follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Back pain and long-term function are considered when choosing levels for surgery in AIS patients. Three hundred and fourteen patients underwent fusion for AIS between 1961 and 1977. One hundred and thirty-four patients were located for potential long-term follow-up.

METHODS

With Institutional Review Board approval, medical records and public resources were used to locate patients. Patients completed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and returned for assessment including full radiographs. Radiographs were analyzed for scoliosis measures, and recognized spinal-pelvic measures including the lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt (PT). Bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between spinal-pelvic measures and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-five of 134 patients agreed to return for complete HRQoL and radiographic follow-up. There were no differences at baseline between those agreeing and declining participation. The cohort was 94% female, had an average age of 60.5 years, and average follow-up of 46 years. In bivariate analysis, pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference (PI-LL) was the only spinal-pelvic parameter which statistically discriminated between patients doing well and not, as assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index and the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference and Fatigue instruments. In multivariable analysis, (PI-LL > 9°) was associated with worse scores in PROMIS-Pain Interference, Physical Function, Depression, Fatigue, Social Function and the total Oswestry score. An SVA > 50 mm was associated with worse scores in the Scoliosis Research Society-7.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of 35 patients with average follow-up of 46 years after posterior spinal instrumentation with Harrington rods (PSIF) for AIS, spinal-pelvic mismatch as identified by (PI-LL > 9°) was associated with inferior HRQoL outcomes. Other spinal-pelvic measures (SVA and PT) were not reliably associated with inferior HRQoL.Level of Evidence: 4.

Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Exist Between Day of Surgical Scheduling and Day of Surgery

PURPOSE

To examine trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores among orthopedic sports medicine patients undergoing surgery who completed PROMIS forms both in the ambulatory (preoperative) setting at the time of surgical scheduling, as well as on the day of surgery (perioperative) prior to their procedure.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing various sports medicine-related surgeries were recruited. Patients were included if they were scheduled for surgery and completed preoperative PROMIS on the day of surgical scheduling and on the day of surgery. Patients were excluded if they refused the questionnaire or had been administered perioperative anesthesia, which would interfere with questionnaire completion. Paired samples t-tests were run between preoperative and perioperative PROMIS scores to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

153 patients were included with an average age of 46.5 years. The average (SD) time between completion of PROMIS questionnaires was 46.5 (44.4) days. The absolute value change in scores between preoperative and perioperative visits was 4.09 for PROMIS UE, 3.59 for PROMIS PF, 3.67 for PROMIS PI, and 4.13 for PROMIS D. The overall net change of scores between preoperative and perioperative visits were -.57 for PROMIS UE CAT, .16 points for PROMIS PF CAT, -.85 points for PROMIS PI CAT, and -2.14 points for PROMIS D CAT. Statistically significant differences in preoperative and perioperative PROMIS PI (P =.042) and PROMIS D (P =.004) scores were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Health states-as measured by PROMIS CAT forms completed among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery-can either improve or worsen preoperatively between the time of administration in both the ambulatory and perioperative setting. Despite the existence of these preoperative trends, it is important to consider patient and surgery-specific causes, such as the anatomic region, type of surgical intervention, and timing of preoperative PROMIS administration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prognostic.

Editorial Commentary: Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Vary Over Time

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores have considerable potential to both streamline the collection of outcome data and provide a common set of metrics to compare and benchmark patient-reported outcomes after orthopaedic procedures. An analysis of PROMIS scores collected at the preoperative clinical visit and the day of surgery found considerable changes in upper- and lower-extremity physical function, pain interference, and depression. These findings suggest that health status may vary between the day of operative consent and the day of surgery. Given the importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical research, quality assurance, and value-based health care, the potential for large changes in scores leading up to the procedure warrants attention toward the timing of PROMIS administration to ensure that the health status of the patient-and its variation-is accurately captured.

PROMIS Scores Should Not be Used in Isolation to Measure Outcomes in Lumbar Stenosis Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish the strength of relationship between the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Adult Depression (AD), Physical Function (PF), and Pain Interference (PI) with the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire (SSSQ) in assessing lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In 2009, there were >35,000 surgeries for LSS, which amounted to $1.65 billion in health care cost. By 2021, there will be >2.4 million people in the United States with symptomatic LSS. There is an increasing emphasis on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to define value in medicine. Therefore, it would be beneficial to compare PROMIS, a universal PRO, against the SSSQ, the "criterion standard" for assessing LSS.

METHODS

Eighty-two patients with LSS completing the PROMIS and SSSQ were enrolled. Per existing institutional protocol, PROMIS AD, PF, and PI were completed at every clinic visit. Linear regression analysis was then performed to evaluate how well the SSSQ and PROMIS scores correlated to each other.

RESULTS

When linear regression was performed for pre-treatment values, the R2 value for the SSSQ PF versus PROMIS PF was 0.14 (P = 0.0008), whereas the R2 value for the SSSQ symptom severity versus PROMIS PI was 0.03 (P = 0.13). The R2 value for the combined SSSQ physical function and symptom severity versus PROMIS AD was 0.07 (P = 0.02). When post-treatment SSSQ satisfaction scores were correlated to postoperative PROMIS AD, PI, and PF scores, the R2 values for a good linear fit were 0.13, 0.25, and 0.18 respectively (P values: 0.01, 0.003, and 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment PROMIS scores do not adequately capture the disease-specific impact of spinal stenosis, but postoperative PROMIS scores better reflect outcomes after surgery for LSS. PROMIS scores should not be used in isolation to assess outcomes in patients with LSS.Level of Evidence: 4.

Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Outcomes in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to examine the ability of preoperative Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores to predict postoperative achievement of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in outcome scores following lumbar spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PROMIS is a computer adaptive testing system that has been validated in spine surgery patients. PROMIS allows for more efficient and personalized data collection compared to legacy assessment tools.

METHODS

A total of 138 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery at a single institution completed PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses of PROMIS scores and clinical factors were performed. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were calculated to determine the ability of preoperative scores to predict postoperative achievement of an MCID of 8. PF and PI t score MCID achievement threshold values with 90% specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

Preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores were significantly correlated to achievement of postoperative MCID after multivariate analysis. Patients with worse preoperative scores were more likely to achieve MCID. Preoperative PF and PI scores showed strong predictive value in determining ability to achieve postoperative MCID with respective area under the curve of 0.85 and 0.82. A preoperative PF threshold T-score of 31.6 had a 64% chance of achieving postoperative MCID, while a preoperative PI threshold t score of 67.8 had an 86% chance of achieving postoperative MCID.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores predicted improvement in postoperative PROMIS scores in lumbar spine surgery patients as worse preoperative scores correlated to improved PROMIS scores postoperatively. The calculated threshold t scores showed the ability to predict improvement in postoperative PROMIS scores. Preoperative PROMIS data may be useful in surgical decision-making and improved patient education regarding postoperative outcomes.Level of Evidence: 4.

Validation of VR-12 Physical Function in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy

BACKGROUND

Although the Veterans RAND 12-item Physical Component Survey (VR-12 PCS) has been broadly used to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in spine surgery, its feasibility for use in patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar discectomy (MIS LD) has not been well studied. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of VR-12 PCS for use up to 2 years postoperatively for MIS LD by correlation with PROMs for physical function.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary single-level MIS LD procedures were reviewed retrospectively. Results on the VR-12 PCS, 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) PCS, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS PF) were recorded preoperatively and up to 2 years postoperatively. Improvements in postoperative PROMs were calculated and assessed for significant differences from baseline values. Correlation significance and strength were evaluated between VR-12 PCS and SF-12 PCS or PROMIS PF. Scatterplots were constructed to demonstrate relationships of VR-12 PCS with SF-12 PCS and PROMIS PF at each time point.

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised 402 patients. Patients improved significantly from preoperative baseline for all 3 PROMs at all postoperative time points. Both Pearson's correlation and time-independent partial correlation revealed statistically significant strong correlations of VR-12 PCS with SF-12 PCS and PROMIS PF through 2-years.

DISCUSSION

Physical function scores for VR-12, SF-12, and PROMIS PF all demonstrated significant improvements following MIS LD. Strongly statistically significant correlations of VR-12 PCS with SF-12 PCS and PROMIS PF from preoperative measures through 2 years demonstrate the feasibility of VR-12 for assessing patient-reported physical function in MIS LD patients.

Prediction of post-interventional physical function in diabetic foot ulcer patients using patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS)

BACKGROUND

Infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients present with an impaired baseline physical function (PF) that can be further compromised by surgical intervention to treat the infection. The impact of surgical interventions on Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PF within the DFU population has not been investigated. We hypothesize that preoperative PROMIS scores (PF, Pain Interference (PI), Depression) in combination with relevant clinical factors can be utilized to predict postoperative PF in DFU patients.

METHODS

DFU patients from a single academic physician's practice between February 2015 and November 2018 were identified (n = 240). Ninety-two patients met inclusion criteria with complete follow-up and PROMIS computer adaptive testing records. Demographic and clinical factors, procedure performed, and wound healing status were collected. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Chi-Squared tests and multidimensional modelling were applied to all variables' pre- and postoperative values to assess patients' postoperative PF.

RESULTS

The mean age was 60.5 (33-96) years and mean follow-up was 4.7 (3-12) months. Over 70 % of the patients' initial PF were 2-3 standard deviations below the US population (n = 49; 28). Preoperative PF (p <  0.01), PI (p < 0.01), Depression (p <  0.01), CRF (p <  0.02) and amputation level (p <  0.04) showed significant univariate correlation with postoperative PF. Multivariate model (r = 0.55) showed that the initial PF (p =  0.004), amputation level (p =  0.008), and wound healing status (p =  0.001) predicted postoperative PF.

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of DFU patients present with poor baseline PF. Preoperative PROMIS scores (PF, PI, Depression) are predictive of postoperative PROMIS PF in DFU patients. Postoperative patient's physical function can be assessed by PF_{postoperative} = 29.42 + 0.34 (PF_initial) - 5.87 (Not Healed) - 2.63 (Amputation Category). This algorithm can serve as a valuable tool for predicting post-operative physical function and setting expectations.

Full Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty with Periendoscopic Visualized Trephine Technique for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Migration and/or Foraminal or Lateral Recess Stenosis

PURPOSE

To introduce a newly designed periendoscopic visualized trephine system for foraminoplasty in treating lumbar disc herniation with migration and/or foraminal or lateral recess stenosis, and report early clinical outcomes evaluated by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

METHODS

A total of 25 patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy with foraminoplasty using a periendoscopic visualized trephine from June 2019 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. PROMIS pain interference and physical function were selected as outcome measures.

RESULTS

The average age of the 25 patients (16 males, 9 females) was 32.0 ± 7.5 years (20-48 years). All patients were successfully followed up with the mean time of 10.1 ± 2.8 months (6-12 months). PROMIS pain interference scores decreased significantly from mean 67.0 ± 3.4 preoperatively to 37.5 ± 5.4 at the final follow-up (P < 0.01), and PROMIS physical function scores improved significantly from mean 29.2 ± 5.5 preoperatively to 59.3 ± 3.7 at the final follow-up (P < 0.01). No neural or vascular complication occurred.

CONCLUSION

Full endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty with a periendoscopic visualized trephine technique is safe and effective for treating lumbar disc herniation with migration and/or lateral recess or foraminal stenosis, with improved flexibility and convenience and decreased radiation exposure.

Bouncing back after lumbar spine surgery: early postoperative resilience is associated with 12-month physical function, pain interference, social participation, and disability

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Positive psychosocial factors early after surgery, such as resilience and self-efficacy, may be important characteristics for informing individualized postoperative care.

PURPOSE

To examine the association of early postoperative resilience and self-efficacy on 12-month physical function, pain interference, social participation, disability, pain intensity, and physical activity after lumbar spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Pooled secondary analysis of prospectively collected trial data from two academic medical centers.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred and forty-eight patients who underwent laminectomy with or without fusion for a degenerative lumbar condition.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Physical function, pain inference, and social participation (ability to participate in social roles and activities) were measured using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. The Oswestry Disability Index, Numeric Rating Scale, and accelerometer activity counts were used to measure disability, pain intensity, and physical activity, respectively.

METHODS

Participants completed validated outcome questionnaires at 6 weeks (baseline) and 12 months after surgery. Baseline positive psychosocial factors included resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire). Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations between early postoperative psychosocial factors and 12-month outcomes adjusting for age, sex, study site, randomized group, fusion status, fear of movement (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), and outcome score at baseline. This study was funded by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and Foundation for Physical Therapy Research. There are no conflicts of interest.

RESULTS

Resilience at 6 weeks after surgery was associated with 12-month physical function (unstandardized beta=1.85 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29; 3.40]), pain interference (unstandardized beta=-1.80 [95% CI: -3.48; -0.12]), social participation (unstandardized beta=2.69 [95% CI: 0.97; 4.41]), and disability (unstandardized beta=-3.03 [95% CI: -6.04; -0.02]). Self-efficacy was associated with 12-month disability (unstandardized beta=-0.21 [95% CI: -0.37; -0.04].

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative resilience and pain self-efficacy were associated with improved 12-month patient-reported outcomes after spine surgery. Future work should consider how early postoperative screening for positive psychosocial characteristics can enhance risk stratification and targeted rehabilitation management in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review

Background

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System^Ⓡ (PROMIS^Ⓡ) is a dynamic system of psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. There has been a recent increase in the use of PROMIS measures, yet little has been written about the reporting of these measures in the field of orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine the uptake of PROMIS measures across orthopedics and to identify the type of PROMIS measures and domains that are most commonly used in orthopedic research and practice.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using keywords and database-specific subject headings to capture orthopedic studies reporting PROMIS measures through November 2018. Our inclusion criteria were use of PROMIS measures as an outcome or used to describe a population of patients in an orthopedic setting in patients ≥ 18 years of age. We excluded non-quantitative studies, reviews, and case reports.

Results

Our final search yielded 88 studies published from 2013 through 2018, with 57% (50 studies) published in 2018 alone. By body region, 28% (25 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, hand), 36% (32 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot), 19% (17 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the spine, 10% (9 studies) reported PROMIS measures in trauma patients, and 6% (5 studies) reported PROMIS measures in general orthopedic patients. The majority of studies reported between one and three PROMIS domains (82%, 73 studies). The PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach was most commonly used (81%, 72 studies). The most frequently reported PROMIS domains were physical function (81%, 71 studies) and pain interference (61%, 54 studies).

Conclusion

Our review found an increase in the reporting of PROMIS measures over the recent years. Utilization of PROMIS measures in orthopedic populations is clinically appropriate and can facilitate communication of outcomes across different provider types and with reduced respondent burden.

Registration

The protocol for this systematic review was designed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and is registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018088260).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-020-02068-9.

Baseline Patient Characteristics Commonly Captured Before Surgery Do Not Accurately Predict Long-Term Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy Followed by Physiotherapy

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and internally validate prognostic models based on commonly collected preoperative data for good and poor outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy followed by physiotherapy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Lumbar microdiscectomy followed by physiotherapy is a common intervention for lumbar radiculopathy. Postoperatively, a considerable percentage of people continues to experience pain and disability. Prognostic models for recovery are scarce.

METHODS

We included 298 patients with lumbar radiculopathy who underwent microdiscectomy followed by physiotherapy. Primary outcomes were recovery and secondary outcomes were pain and disability at 12 months follow-up. Potential prognostic factors were selected from sociodemographic and biomedical data commonly captured preoperatively. The association between baseline characteristics and outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

At 12 months follow-up, 75.8% of the participants met the criterion for recovery. Variables in the model for good recovery included: younger age, leg pain greater than back pain, high level of disability, and a disc herniation at another level than L3-L4. The model for poor recovery included: lower educational level, prior back surgery, and disc herniation at L3-L4. Following internal validation, the explained variance (Nagelkerke R) and area under the curve for both models were poor (≤0.02 and ≤0.60, respectively). The discriminative ability of the models for disability and pain were also poor.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of microdiscectomy followed by postoperative physiotherapy cannot be predicted accurately by commonly captured preoperative sociodemographic and biomedical factors. The potential value of other biomedical, personal, and external factors should be further investigated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Role of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Predicting Outcome of Bunion Surgery

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have suggested preoperative patient-reported outcome scores could predict patients who would achieve a clinically meaningful improvement with hallux valgus surgery. Our goal was to determine bunionectomy-specific thresholds using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) values to predict patients who would or would not benefit from bunion surgery.

METHODS

PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression assessments were prospectively collected. Forty-two patients were included in the study. Using preoperative and final follow-up visit scores, minimally clinically important differences (MCID), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were performed to determine if preoperative PROMIS scores predicted achieving MCID with 95% specificity or failing to achieve an MCID with 95% sensitivity.

RESULTS

PROMIS PF demonstrated a significant AUC and likelihood ratio. The preoperative threshold score for failing to achieve MCID for PF was 49.6 with 95% sensitivity. The likelihood ratio was 0.14 (confidence interval, 0.02-0.94). The posttest probability of failure to achieve an MCID for PF was 94.1%. PI and depression AUCs were not significant, and thus thresholds were not determined.

CONCLUSION

We identified a PF threshold of 49.6, which was nearly 1 standard deviation higher than previously published. If a patient is hoping to improve PF, a patient with a preoperative t score >49.6 may not benefit from surgery. This study also suggests the need for additional research to delineate procedure-specific thresholds.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Establishing "Normal" Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores: A True Reference Score According to Adults Free of Joint Pain and Disability

Numerous recent studies have demonstrated the validity and efficiency of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) forms in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical procedures. It is assumed that a score of 50 in each domain represents the health state of a “reference” population, but this threshold has not been definitively proven. In order to truly assess whether a given orthopaedic intervention is successful, the comparative scores of healthy individuals must be known for any given health domain measured. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine baseline scores for the PROMIS general physical function (PROMIS-PF), pain interference (PROMIS-PI), and upper-extremity physical function (PROMIS-UE) domains in physically healthy, asymptomatic adult individuals. We hypothesized that, in individuals <40 years old, the mean PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-UE scores would be >50 and PROMIS-PI scores would be <50. We further hypothesized that these scores would be impacted by participant age.

Minimal Clinically Important Differences for PROMIS Physical Function, Upper Extremity, and Pain Interference in Carpal Tunnel Release Using Region- and Condition-Specific PROM Tools

PURPOSE

Uncertainty exists about what change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores represents a clinically relevant improvement (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) in hand surgery care. Using a region-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) (Michigan Hand Question [MHQ]) and a condition-specific PROM (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire [BCTQ]), MCID values were determined for PROMIS Physical Function (PF), Upper Extremity (UE), and Pain Interference (PI) computerized adaptive testing among patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR).

METHODS

Patients undergoing CTR with a single surgeon from November 2014 to April 2017 were asked to complete the BCTQ, MHQ, and PROMIS PF, UE, and PI at each visit. Patients who had completed questionnaires both at a preoperative and either a 6-week or a 3-month postoperative visit were included. The PROMIS PF, UE, and PI MCID values were calculated using previously determined MCID estimates in the literature with both region- (ie, MHQ) and condition-specific (ie, BCTQ) PROM anchors. The PROMIS domain MCID estimates were also determined using the distribution-based method.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients fit our inclusion criteria. Using MHQ Function and Pain, PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs were 6.3, 1.8, and -8.9, respectively. Using the average of the 2 BCTQ domains, PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs were 8.0, 2.8, and -9.7, respectively. Using the distribution-based method, PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs were 4.2, 2.7, and -4.1, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using region- and condition-specific PROMs, we were able to provide MCID estimates of PROMIS UE, PF, and PI for patients undergoing CTR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Estimating PROMIS UE, PF, and PI MCIDs in CTR using validated region- and condition-specific PROMs provides hand surgeons a way to evaluate CTR outcomes not previously described in the literature. Surgeons should understand that these values are only estimates and future work is needed to verify whether they reflect clinical improvement.

Comparison of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, and PROMIS Instruments in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

PURPOSE

Patient-reported outcomes are important to assess improvement after surgery. Common instruments for carpal tunnel syndrome include the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (CTQ). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) are newer measures. We evaluated how the PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) and Upper Extremity (UE) scores change after carpal tunnel release.

METHODS

All adult patients with carpal tunnel syndrome treated surgically were asked to participate in this prospective study. PROMIS instruments, MHQ, and CTQ were completed by 101 patients. Estimated means and standard errors were calculated, and piecewise linear fixed effects regression models were applied to the data. Standardized response means were calculated for each outcome measure.

RESULTS

The MHQ Total Score did not show a considerable change from the preoperative to 1-week postoperative visit but improved from the 1-week to 3-month postoperative visit (55 to 80). The CTQ Functional Status Score (FSS) worsened from 2.3 preoperatively to 2.6 at the 1-week postoperative visit before improving through the 3-month postoperative visit (1.6). PROMIS UE showed responsiveness similar to the CTQ FSS with a decline at the 1-week visit, 38 to 33, followed by improvement (45 at 3 mo). However, the standardized response mean values were greater for the CTQ FSS compared with PROMIS UE. The average administration time was shortest for PROMIS UE. The CTQ Symptom Severity Scale and MHQ Pain Scores showed improvements as early as the 1-week visit. The CTQ Symptom Severity Scale improved from 3.1 to 2.3, and MHQ Pain Scores improved from 55 to 46. PROMIS PI did not change at the 1-week visit but improved at 6 weeks and 3 months, from 56 to 52 and 49. The standardized response means for PROMIS PI achieved a large effect size only at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTQ FSS is more responsive than PROMIS UE and the MHQ, with the CTQ FSS showing the largest effect sizes. PROMIS PI does not show the responsiveness seen in the CTQ Symptom Severity Scale and MHQ Pain Score. PROMIS instruments require less time to complete.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates the change in PROMIS scores after carpal tunnel release and how they compare with legacy outcome instruments.

Patient-reported outcomes use during orthopaedic surgery clinic visits improves the patient experience

OBJECTIVES

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is growing in popularity as healthcare shifts towards a value-based system. However, it remains unclear if PROMIS use improves the patient experience. The aim of the present study was to determine if PROMIS use as part of routine orthopaedic clinical care is associated with improved patient experience, as measured by the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CGCAHPS) survey.

METHODS

All patient visits to an orthopaedic surgery clinic at a single academic medical centre between February 2015 and September 2016 were reviewed. Accounting for known patient factors that have an impact on clinic visit satisfaction, CGCAHPS scores were compared between patients who had PROMIS used as part of their routine care and those who had not had PROMIS used as part of their routine care. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 8,607 patient visits fitted our inclusion criteria. Of these, surgeons elected not to use PROMIS in 8,422 patient encounters, leaving 185 patient visits in which PROMIS was actively used. When PROMIS was used, patients were significantly more likely to feel that the provider had spent enough time with them, to recommend this provider office to another patient and to rate the provider significantly higher on a scale from 0 to 10. Although not significant, a trend was found between use of PROMIS and whether a patient felt that a provider explained health information in way that the patient understood.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS use in an orthopaedic clinic visit can have a positive impact on the patient experience, which is currently part of a number of alternative payment models.