"Rule of Spence" and Dickman's Classification of Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury Revisited: Discrepancy of Prediction on Atlantoaxial Stability Based on Clinical Outcome of Nonoperative Treatment for Atlas Fractures

Utility of Anterior Atlantodens Interval Widening on Cervical Spine CT for Assessing Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, cross-sectional.

OBJECTIVES

To identify trauma patients with confirmed tears of the transverse atlantal ligament on cervical MRI and measure several parameters of atlanto-axial alignment on cervical CT, including the anterior atlantodens interval, to determine which method is most sensitive in predicting transverse atlantal ligament injury.

METHODS

Adult trauma patients who suffered a transverse atlantal ligament tear on cervical MRI were identified retrospectively. The cervical CT and MRI exams for these patients were reviewed for the following: anterior and lateral atlantodens interval widening, lateral C1 mass offset, C1-C2 rotatory subluxation, and transverse atlantal ligament injuries on cervical MRI.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were identified with a tear of the transverse atlantal ligament on cervical MRI. Twelve percent of these patients demonstrated an anterior dens interval measuring greater than 2 mm, 26% of patients demonstrated lateral mass offset of C1 on C2 (average offset of 2.4 mm), 18% of patients demonstrated an asymmetry greater than 1 mm between the left and right lateral atlantodens interval, and one patient demonstrated atlanto-axial rotation measuring greater than 20%. Ten patients had an accompanying C1 burst fracture and eight patients had a C2 fracture. One patient demonstrated widening of the atlanto-occipital joint space greater than 2 mm indicative of craniocervical dissociation injury.

CONCLUSIONS

An anterior atlantodens interval measuring greater than 2 mm is an unreliable methodology to screen trauma patients for transverse altantal ligament injuries and atlanto-axial instability. Moreover, C1 lateral mass offset, lateral atlantodens asymmetry, and atlanto-axial rotation were all poor predictors of transverse atlantal ligament tears.

Technical Considerations in Surgical Fixation of Jefferson Fracture

Jefferson fracture is defined as the simultaneous disruption of the continuity of the anterior and posterior arches of the atlas vertebra. It generally results from an axial impact to the head. Most of these fractures are amenable to nonoperative management. Significant disruption of the transverse atlantal ligament that is the main stabilizing ligament of the atlantoaxial articulation and contiguous spinal injuries often form the indications for operative intervention in these fractures. The outward and caudal displacement of the C1 lateral masses observed in these fractures often requires significant deviation from the standard operative technique of atlantoaxial fixation when the osseous elements are intact. Accordingly, we have described the surgical nuances relevant to the exposure and instrumentation of the atlantoaxial region in the setting of Jefferson fracture, through our experience in two cases.

Risk Factors for Fracture Nonunion and Transverse Atlantal Ligament Injury After Isolated Atlas Fractures: A Case Series of 97 Patients

BACKGROUND

The management of atlas fractures is controversial and hinges on the integrity of transverse atlantal ligament (TAL).

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for atlas fracture nonunion, with and without TAL injury.

METHODS

All isolated, traumatic atlas fractures treated at our institution between 1999 and 2016 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with TAL injury confirmed on MRI, occult TAL injury seen on MRI but not suspected on computed tomography (CT), and with fracture nonunion on follow-up CT at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Lateral mass displacement (LMD) ≥ 7 mm had a 48.2% sensitivity, 98.3% specificity, and 82.6% accuracy for identifying TAL injury. MRI-confirmed TAL injury was independently associated with LMD > 7 mm ( P = .004) and atlanto-dental interval ( P = .039), and occult TAL injury was associated with atlanto-dental interval ( P = .019). Halo immobilization was associated with having a Gehweiler type 3 fracture ( P = .020), a high-risk injury mechanism ( P = .023), and an 18.1% complication rate. Thirteen patients with TAL injury on MRI and/or LMD ≥ 7 mm were treated with a cervical collar only, and 11 patients (84.6%) healed at 12 weeks. Nonunion rates at 12 weeks were equivalent between halo (11.1%) and cervical collar (12.5%). Only age independently predicted nonunion at 12 weeks ( P = .026).

CONCLUSION

LMD > 7 mm on CT is not sensitive for TAL injury. Some atlas fractures with TAL injury can be managed with a cervical collar. Nonunion rates are not different between halo immobilization and cervical collar, but a strong selection bias precludes directly comparing the efficacy of these modalities. Age independently predicts nonunion.

Surgical Versus Conservative Management for Treating Unstable Atlas Fractures: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter study compared radiological parameters and clinical outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical management and investigated treatment characteristics associated with the successful management of unstable atlas fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 53 consecutive patients with unstable atlas fracture who underwent halo-vest immobilization (HVI) or surgical fixation. Clinical outcomes were assessed using neck visual analogue scale and disability index. The radiological assessment included total lateral mass displacement (LMD) and the anterior atlantodental interval (AADI).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients underwent surgical fixation and 21 received HVI (mean follow-up, 24.9 months). In the surgical fixation, but not in the HVI, LMD, and AADI showed statistically significant improvements at the last follow-up. The osseous healing rate and time-to-healing were 100% and 14.3 weeks with surgical fixation, compared with 71.43% and 20.0 weeks with HVI, respectively. Patients treated with HVI showed poorer neck pain and neck disability outcomes than those who received surgical treatment. LMD showed an association with osseous healing outcomes in nonoperative management. Clinical outcomes and osseous healing showed no significant differences according to Dickman's classification of transverse atlantal ligament injuries.

CONCLUSION

Surgical internal fixation had a higher fusion rate, shorter fracture healing time, more favorable clinical outcomes, and a more significant reduction in LMD and AADI compared to nonoperative management. The pitfalls of external immobilization are inadequate maintenance and a lower probability of reducing fractured lateral masses. Stabilization by surgical reduction with interconnected fixation proved to be a more practical management strategy than nonoperative treatment for unstable atlas fractures.

Interrelationship Between Craniocervical Dissociation Spectrum Injuries and Atlantoaxial Instability on Trauma Cervical MRI Examinations

Background and purpose Craniocervical dissociation injuries encompass a spectrum of osteoligamentous injuries between the skull base and C1-C2 that may be treated via prolonged external immobilization versus occipital cervical fusion depending on the risk of persistent craniocervical instability. However, the presence of atlantoaxial instability (AAI) at C1-C2, as determined by transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) integrity with or without a C1 fracture, may guide the neurosurgical management of craniocervical dissociation spectrum injuries (CDSI) since it implies an overall greater degree of instability at the craniocervical junction (CCJ). Materials and methods Adult trauma patients who suffered a transverse atlantal ligament injury on cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were identified retrospectively. The cervical computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging examinations for these patients were reviewed for additional traumatic findings. Demographic information, treatment, and outcome information were recorded. Results Twenty-nine trauma patients presented to the emergency department (ED) with an acute, midsubstance transverse atlantal ligament tear on cervical magnetic resonance imaging. Thirty-one percent of patients demonstrated a tear in at least one major craniocervical ligament (atlanto-occipital capsular ligaments, alar ligaments, and tectorial membrane {TM}) with 14% demonstrating a tear in two major craniocervical ligaments and no patients demonstrating a tear in all three major craniocervical ligaments. Minor craniocervical ligament injuries (anterior atlanto-occipital membrane complex {AAOMc} and posterior atlanto-occipital membrane complex {PAOMc}) were common and observed in 76% of patients. Conclusions Our study suggests that multiple major craniocervical junction ligamentous injuries on cervical magnetic resonance imaging are relatively uncommon in the setting of transverse atlantal ligament injury.

Appropriateness of Cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation and Management of C1 Jefferson Fractures

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, C1 fractures have been designated as stable or unstable based on the inherent integrity of the transverse altantal ligament. The purpose of our study was to identify adult trauma patients with C1 fractures on cervical computed tomography and evaluate whether C1-C2 alignment differed in patients with and without an associated transverse atlantal ligament injury on follow-up cervical magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

Adult trauma patients who suffered a C1 fracture were identified retrospectively. The cervical computed tomography examinations for these patients were reviewed for the following: C1 fracture classification, anterior atlantodens interval (ADI) widening, asymmetry in the lateral atlantodens interval, C1 lateral mass offset, and atlantoaxial rotation.

RESULTS

Acute C1 fractures were grouped into those with an unequivocal transverse atlantal ligament injury (n = 12), and patients with an unequivocally intact transverse atlantal ligament (n = 20). Three patients were classified as indeterminate for transverse atlantal ligament injury. Statistically significant increases in lateral ADI asymmetry and combined C1 lateral mass offset were identified in patients with transverse atlantal ligament tears.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral ADI asymmetry (using a cutoff of >3 mm), combined C1 lateral mass offset, and anterior ADI demonstrate robust specificity to "rule in" transverse atlantal ligament injury. Atlantoaxial alignment was overall relatively insensitive as a screening test although sensitivity can be improved using a cutoff of >2 mm for lateral ADI asymmetry. Our findings reinforce the role of cervical magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic workup and clinical management of trauma patients with an acute burst fracture of the C1 vertebra.

Analysis of Risk Factors and Surgical Strategy of Knee Traumatic Arthritis after Internal Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fracture

Objective

To explore the risk factors and surgical strategies of knee traumatic arthritis after internal plate fixation in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture.

Methods

A total of 300 patients with tibial plateau fractures treated with internal plate fixation in our hospital from January 2019 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether secondary knee traumatic arthritis occurred after operation, they were divided into control group and research group. The control group was nonsecondary knee traumatic arthritis (n = 231), and the research group was secondary knee traumatic arthritis (n = 69). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used in this research.

Results

There were significant differences in fracture classification, injury method, osteoporosis, and the time from injury to operation between the two groups, and there are statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.05). Fracture type, injury method, osteoporosis, and time from injury to operation were the influencing factors of tibial internal fixation, and there are statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.05). Platform fracture was an independent risk factor for postoperative knee joint traumatic arthritis, and there are statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.05). The HSS scores of both groups increased after operation, and there are statistically significant differences between groups (P < 0.05). No loosening of the prosthesis was found in all 69 patients with postoperative X-ray examination.

Conclusion

Fracture classification, injury mode, osteoporosis, and time from injury to operation are independent risk factors for knee traumatic arthritis in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures with internal plate fixation, incidence of knee trauma.

Fifty years later: the "rule of Spence" is finally ready for retirement

Determination of the optimal approach to traumatic atlas fractures with or without transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury requires a nuanced understanding of the biomechanics of the atlantoaxial complex. The "rule of Spence" (ROS) was created in 1970 in a landmark effort to streamline management of burst-type atlas fractures. The ROS states that radiographic evidence of lateral mass displacement (LMD) (i.e., the distance that the C1 lateral masses extend beyond the C2 superior articular processes) greater than 6.9 mm may indicate both a torn TAL and need for surgical management. Since then, the ROS has become ubiquitous in the spine literature about atlas injuries. However, in the decades since the original paper by Spence et al., modern research efforts and imaging advancements have revealed that the ROS is inaccurate on both fronts: it neither accurately predicts a TAL injury nor does it inform surgical decision-making. The purpose of this review was to delineate the history of the ROS, demonstrate its limitations, present findings in the existing literature on ROS and LMD thresholds, and discuss the current landscape of management techniques for TAL injuries, including parameters such as the atlantodental interval and type of injury according to the Dickman classification system and AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system. The ROS was revolutionary for initially investigating and later propelling the biomechanical and clinical understanding of atlas fractures and TAL injuries; however, it is time to retire its legacy as a rule.

The relationship between radiologic parameters and transverse atlantal ligament injury obtained from MRI scans in patients with an isolated atlas burst fracture: A retrospective observational study

The treatment of an atlas burst fracture depends on whether transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury is present. We compared the radiologic parameters associated with the presence of a TAL injury as detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and verified whether the lateral mass displacement (LMD) criteria currently used to diagnose TAL injuries in atlas burst fractures are reliable or need revision.Thirty patients who presented with isolated atlas burst fractures were included in this retrospective observational study. We measured radiologic parameters, including LMD, atlanto-dental interval, basion-dens interval, internal lateral mass displacement, and external lateral mass displacement, in each patient at the time of initial presentation. The presence of TAL injury was evaluated using MRI. We compared the radiologic parameters and characteristics of patients who presented with TAL injury. We also determined the sensitivity and specificity of an LMD test to accurately diagnose TAL injury based on MRI. Finally, we compared the radiologic parameters according to the presence of surgical treatment and patient union status.Twenty patients presented with an intact TAL, while 10 patients had a TAL injury on MRI. LMD was significantly higher in patients with TAL injury (9.61 vs 3.73 mm, P < .001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, LMD was also significantly higher in patients with TAL injury. The sensitivity and specificity of LMD for diagnosing TAL injury based on MRI in patients with isolated C1 fractures were 90% and 100%, respectively. The incidence of an LMD greater than 8.1 mm was statistically higher in patients than in those without TAL injury (90% vs 0%, P < .001).Nine patients underwent surgery for isolated atlas burst fractures, and 21 did not. LMD (9.56 vs 4.03 mm, P < .001) and fracture gap (7.96 vs 4.01 mm, P < .001) were significantly higher in patients who underwent surgery.Among the various radiologic parameters, LMD closely correlated with the presence of TAL injury, as patients with an LMD greater than 8.1 mm were more likely to have a TAL injury in the case of atlas burst fractures. LMD is a good method for predicting the presence of TAL injury if MRI is not available.

Upper Cervical Trauma

Craniocervical injuries (CCJs) account for 10% to 30% of all cervical spine trauma. An increasing number of patients are surviving these injuries due to advancements in automobile technology, resuscitation techniques, and diagnostic modalities. The leading injury mechanisms are motor vehicle crashes, falls from height, and sports-related events. Current treatment with urgent rigid posterior fixation of the occiput to the cervical spine has resulted in a substantial reduction in management delays expedites treatment of CCJ injuries. Within CCJ injuries, there is a spectrum of instability, ranging from isolated nondisplaced occipital condyle fractures treated nonoperatively to highly unstable injuries with severely distracted craniocervical dissociation. Despite the evolution of understanding and improvement in the management of cases regarding catastrophic failure to diagnose, subsequent neurologic deterioration still occurs even in experienced trauma centers. The purpose of this article is to review the injuries that occur at the CCJ with the accompanying anatomy, presentation, imaging, classification, management, and outcomes.

C1:C2 ratio is a potential tool assessing atlas fracture displacement and transverse ligament injury

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of a C1:C2 ratio in a cohort of patients with atlas fractures. Second, we aimed to consider the utility of the C1:C2 ratio with regard to diagnosis of transverse ligament (TL) injury.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis.

METHODS

Patients with atlas fractures in the Waikato region between 2008 and 2010 were identified retrospectively through clinical coding and collated radiology trauma database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The maximal width of C1 and C2 was measured using the first-taken trauma radiograph series. Combined overhang of lateral masses (△mm) and a C1:C2 ratio was then calculated. Final ratio and atlanto-dens interval (ADI) were measured at the last clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients with full radiographic records were included. Of these, five patients (21%) had TL injuries confirmed on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. No patient with a ratio 1.15 had an intact TL, whereas a ratio of >1.10 captured 80% of TL injuries. The ratio (P < 0.001) and delta values (P < 0.001) were statistically significantly different between TL-injured and TL-intact cohorts. Two patients in the TL injury group demonstrated increased ADI on final follow-up with a ratio of >1.10.

CONCLUSIONS

A C1:C2 ratio >1.10 on plain radiographs showed a sensitivity of 80% in detecting atlas fractures with associated TL injury. All patients with a ratio of ≥1.15 had TL rupture subsequently confirmed by an advanced modality. A ratio calculation on radiographs is a potentially useful method of describing atlas lateral mass displacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.