Vertebral Growth Around Distal Instrumented Vertebra in Patients With Early-Onset Scoliosis Who Underwent Traditional Dual Growing Rod Treatment

Novel dual: rod plate system for EOS improves vertebral wedging and permits spinal growth

BACKGROUND

To determine whether single-stage, growth-friendly instrumentation with a plate-rod spinal system (PRSS) can substantially correct the deformity of EOS at surgery and continue to rectify the deformity throughout the growth period.

METHODS

An observational study of 35 children with EOS treated by PRSS between February 2000 and October 2010 during a mean follow-up of 72 months. The mean age at surgery was 7 years. X-rays were taken preoperatively and postoperatively and at each follow-up. The Cobb angle, the apical vertebral wedge angle (AVWA), remaining rod lengths, maximal thoracic kyphosis and total T1-S1 heights were measured and compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients, 9 boys and 22 girls, with a mean age of 7 years were completed follow-up. The Cobb angle changed from 64° to 36° after initial surgery and 26° at the last follow-up. The mean AVWA was 15° postoperatively and 5° at the last follow-up. The mean rod tail reserve length decreased from 53 mm immediately after surgery to 12 mm at the last follow-up. The mean preoperative maximum thoracic kyphosis was 41° and changed to 35° and 30° postoperatively and at latest follow-up, respectively. The mean preoperative T1-S1 height for all 32 patients was 52 mm acute lengthening and 122 mm of lengthening by the end of follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The PRSS provided immediate correction of most of the deformity at surgery and continued to rectify remaining scoliosis during the growth period. AVWA may be a useful method for monitoring the function of the PRSS in EOS.

Comment on Burgos et al. Fusionless All-Pedicle Screws for Posterior Deformity Correction in AIS Immature Patients Permit the Restoration of Normal Vertebral Morphology and Removal of the Instrumentation Once Bone Maturity Is Reached. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2408

With great interest, we read the recently published paper "Fusionless All-Pedicle Screws for Posterior Deformity Correction in AIS Immature Patients Permit the Restoration of Normal Vertebral Morphology and Removal of the Instrumentation Once Bone Maturity is Reached" by Burgos et al. [...].

Finite Element Comparison of the Spring Distraction System and the Traditional Growing Rod for the Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Finite element analysis (FEA).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine biomechanical differences between traditional growing rod (TGR) and spring distraction system (SDS) treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many "growth-friendly" implants like the TGR show high rates of implant failure, spinal stiffening, and intervertebral disc (IVD) height loss. We developed the SDS, which employs continuous, dynamic forces to mitigate these limitations. The present FEA compares TGR and SDS implantation, followed by an 18-month growth period.

METHODS

Two representative, ligamentous, scoliotic FEA models were created for this study; one representing TGR and one representing SDS. initial implantation, and up to 18 months of physeal spinal growth were simulated. The SDS model was continuously distracted over this period; the TGR model included two additional distractions following index surgery. Outcomes included differences in rod stress, spinal morphology and iVD stress-shielding.

RESULTS

Maximum postoperative von Mises stress was 249MPa for SDS, and 205MPa for TGR. During the 6-month TGR distraction, TGR rod stress increased over two-fold to a maximum stress of 417MPa, compared to a maximum of 262 MPa in the SDS model at 6-month follow-up. During subsequent follow-up periods, TGR rod stress remained consistently higher than stresses in the SDS model. Additional lengthenings in the TGR model led to a smaller residual curve (16.08) and higher T1-S1 growth (359 mm) at 18-month follow-up compared to the SDS model (26.98, 348 mm). During follow-up, there was less stress-shielding of the IVDs in the SDS model, compared to the TGR model. At 18-month follow-up, upper and lower IVD surfaces of the SDS model were loaded more in compression than their TGR counterparts (mean upper: +112 ± 19N; mean lower: +100 ± 17N).

CONCLUSION

In the present FEA, TGR treatment resulted in slightly larger curve correction compared to SDS, at the expense of increased IVD stress-shielding and a higher risk of rod fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Disc and Vertebral Body Morphology From Birth to Adulthood

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the morphology of intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies during growth in asymptomatic children and adolescents.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Earlier studies demonstrated that spinal growth occurs predominantly in vertebral bodies. This axiom introduced a vertebral-body-focus for unravelling etiological questions and achieve growth-modulation in young spinal deformity patients. Recent studies show the importance of the intervertebral discs in the early phases and possible etiology of pediatric spinal deformities. There is presently a paucity of 3D morphometric data of spinal elements during growth.

METHODS

A database of 298 patients aged 0 to 21 that have received a computed tomography scan for indications not related to the spine was analyzed. Custom made software was used to semi-automatically measure intervertebral disc and vertebral body morphology, corrected for orientation in all 3 planes.

RESULTS

Vertebral body height increased from birth up to adulthood, from 4-to-14 mm in the cervical, 6 to 20 mm in the thoracic, and 9 to 28 mm in the lumbar spine. This increase was 0.70 mm/year in males, more pronounced than females with 0.62 mm/year (P = 0.001). Lumbar discs increased throughout growth from 4.4 to 9.0 mm, whereas thoracic discs only increased from 3.5 to 4.9 mm at age 4 and remained stable afterwards, similarly for cervical discs. The disc transverse surface area increased greatly and consistently throughout growth. Disc slenderness was stable in the lumbar spine during growth, but decreased in the thoracic and cervical spine. Overall, discs were more slender in females, especially around early adolescence.

CONCLUSION

The spine grows predominantly in the vertebral bodies. Thoracic discs increase in height only during the first years, whereas the transverse surface area continues to increase throughout growth, thus discs slenderness decreases. Relatively, female discs remained slenderer around growth-spurt. These measurements may assist future studies on the role of disc morphology in the etiology and treatment of spinal deformity.Level of Evidence: 4.

Smaller Intervertebral Disc Volume and More Disc Degeneration after Spinal Distraction in Scoliotic Children

In recent decades, magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) were established to treat progressive early-onset scoliosis. The aim of this investigation was to assess the effect of long-term MCGR with continuous distraction on intervertebral discs in scoliotic children. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 33 children with spinal muscular atrophy was analyzed by grading intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) and measuring intervertebral disc volume. Cohort I (n = 17) were children who had continuous spinal distraction with MCGRs for 5.1 years and MRI before (av. age 8.1) and after (av. age 13.4) MCGR treatment. Cohort II (n = 16, av. age 13.7) were patients without prior surgical treatment. Lumbar intervertebral disc volume of cohort I did not change during 5.1 years of MCGR treatment, whereas disc volumes were significantly larger in age- and disease-matched children without prior treatment (cohort II). Cohort I showed more IDD after MCGR treatment in comparison to early MRI studies of the same patients and children without surgical treatment. MRI data showed a volume reduction and disc degeneration of lower thoracic and lumbar intervertebral discs in scoliotic children after continuous spinal distraction with MCGRs. These effects were confirmed in the same subjects before and after treatment as well as in surgically untreated controls.