Anterior Cervical Decompression and C5 Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Three Reconstructive Surgeries

Network Meta-Analysis of C5 Palsy After Anterior Cervical Decompression of Three to Six Levels: Comparing Three Different Procedures

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Using a network meta-analysis (NMA), this study aimed to compare the risks of C5 palsy after three different procedures of anterior cervical decompression.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

C5 palsy is a well-known complication affecting the quality of life after anterior procedures. Due to the limited evidence on the various procedures available, we evaluate the basis for selection to prevent palsy and achieve maximal decompression in cases spanning 3-6 levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search for C5 palsy and complications after 3representative procedures, including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), and their combination (hybrid), involving 3 to 6 intervertebral levels. The incidence of C5 palsy was compared using a NMA.

RESULTS

We identified 1655 patients in 11 studies who met inclusion criteria. Sixty-nine patients (4.2%) developed delayed C5 palsies. The incidences among ACDF, ACCF, and hybrid cases were 2.3% (16/684, 95% CI: 1.4% to 3.8%), 6.4% (39/613, 95% CI: 4.7% to 8.6%), and 3.9% (14/358, 95% CI: 2.3% to 6.5%), respectively ( P < 0.01). A NMA was performed for 15 pairwise comparisons across the 3 procedure arms: ACDF versus hybrid, 7/232 (3.0%) versus 11/234 (4.7%); hybrid versus ACCF, 14/301 (4.3%) versus 18/224 (8.0%); ACCF versus ACDF, 38/523 (7.8%) versus 16/619 (2.6%). Compared with ACDF, the risk of C5 palsy was significantly higher in ACCF (odds ratio: 2.72, 95% CI: 1.47 to 5.01), whereas ACDF versus hybrid did not significantly differ in risk (odds ratio: 1.56, 95% CI: 0.68 to 3.60).

CONCLUSION

We determined that ACCF was associated with a higher risk of postoperative C5 palsy than ACDF in cases spanning 3 to 6 intervertebral levels. If practicable, ACDF surgery may be an appropriate choice for cases requiring anterior decompression of 3 to 6 levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Characteristics of Postoperative C5 Palsy Following Anterior Decompression and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Degenerative Disorders: Trends Associated with Advancements in Surgical Technique

OBJECTIVE

To investigate trends in the characteristics of postoperative C5 palsy following anterior decompression and fusion associated with advancements in this surgical procedure to treat cervical degenerative disorders.

METHODS

We included 801 consecutive patients who underwent anterior decompression and fusion for cervical degenerative disorders from 2006 to 2019 and investigated the incidence, onset, and prognosis of C5 palsy. In addition, we compared the incidence of C5 palsy with that found in our previous investigation.

RESULTS

The cases of 42 (5.2%) patients were complicated by C5 palsy. For patients with ossification of the longitudinal ligament (OPLL), 22 (12.4%) of 177 were complicated with C5 palsy, and the incidence was significantly higher than that in patients without OPLL (20 [3.2%] of 624, P < 0.01). The incidence of C5 palsy in patients without OPLL was significantly lower than that found in our previous investigation (P < 0.01). The incidence of C5 palsy in patients that required contiguous multilevel corpectomy was significantly higher in patients that required within a single corpectomy (P < 0.01). At 1-year follow-up, muscle strength in 3 (6.1%) of 49 limbs had not improved sufficiently.

CONCLUSIONS

With advancements in surgical techniques which allowed necessary and sufficient spinal cord decompression and avoided unnecessary corpectomy, the incidence of C5 palsy in patients without OPLL was decreased significantly. By contrast, for patients with OPLL, the incidence of C5 palsy was similar to the incidence found previously, perhaps because a broad and contiguous multilevel corpectomy was usually needed to decompress the spinal cord sufficiently.

A Risk Calculator for the Prediction of C5 Nerve Root Palsy After Instrumented Cervical Fusion

BACKGROUND

C5 palsy is a common postoperative complication after cervical fusion and is associated with increased health care costs and diminished quality of life. Accurate prediction of C5 palsy may allow for appropriate preoperative counseling and risk stratification. We primarily aim to develop an algorithm for the prediction of C5 palsy after instrumented cervical fusion and identify novel features for risk prediction. Additionally, we aim to build a risk calculator to provide the risk of C5 palsy.

METHODS

We identified adult patients who underwent instrumented cervical fusion at a tertiary care medical center between 2013 and 2020. The primary outcome was postoperative C5 palsy. We developed ensemble machine learning, standard machine learning, and logistic regression models predicting the risk of C5 palsy-assessing discrimination and calibration. Additionally, a web-based risk calculator was built with the best-performing model.

RESULTS

A total of 1024 patients were included, with 52 cases of C5 palsy. The ensemble model was well-calibrated and demonstrated excellent discrimination with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.773. The following features were the most important for ensemble model performance: diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, C5 or C4 level, surgical approach, preoperative non-motor neurologic symptoms, degenerative disease, number of fused levels, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a risk calculator that generates patient-specific C5 palsy risk after instrumented cervical fusion. Individualized risk prediction for patients may facilitate improved preoperative patient counseling and risk stratification as well as potential intraoperative mitigating measures. This tool may also aid in addressing potentially modifiable risk factors such as diabetes and obesity.