Denosumab Treatment for Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine Including the Sacrum

Efficacy and safety of denosumab de‑escalation in giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive intermediate bone tumor. Denosumab has shown effectiveness in GCTB treatment; however, the benefits of denosumab de-escalation for unresectable GCTB have not been well discussed. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of denosumab de-escalation for GCTB. The medical records of 9 patients with unresectable GCTB or resectable GCTB not eligible for resection, who received de-escalated denosumab treatment at Okayama University Hospital (Okayama, Japan) between April 2014 and December 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. The denosumab treatment interval was gradually extended to every 8, 12 and 24 weeks. The radiographic changes and clinical symptoms during standard and de-escalated denosumab therapy were assessed. The denosumab interval was de-escalated after a median of 12 months of a standard 4-weekly treatment. Imaging showed that the re-ossification of osteolytic lesions obtained with the 4-weekly treatment were sustained with 8- and 12-weekly treatments. The extraskeletal masses reduced significantly with standard treatment, while tumor reduction was sustained during de-escalated treatment. During the 24-weekly treatment, 2 patients remained stable, while 2 patients developed local recurrence. The clinical symptoms improved significantly with standard treatment and remained improved during de-escalated treatment. There were severe adverse events including osteonecrosis of the jaw (2 patients), atypical femoral fracture (1 patient) and malignant transformation of GCTB (1 patient). In conclusion, 12-weekly de-escalated denosumab treatment showed clinical benefits as a maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable GCTB, in addition to sustained stable tumor control and improved clinical symptoms with standard treatment. A 24-weekly treatment can also be administered, with careful attention paid to detecting local recurrence.

Effect of denosumab in treatment of unresectable spine and sacrum giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare tumor of the bone that is locally invasive. Surgery is the primary treatment that is usually done by intralesional curettage. In pelvis and spine surgery may be associated with high rate of complications, recently, Denosumab has been proposed for the treatment of these tumors in latter anatomical regions. Denosumab may be administered alone or as an adjuvant to surgery. This study aimed to assess the treatment effects of Denosumab in patients with unresectable GCTB. This study was a case series. Patients with unresectable GCTB of vertebra and sacrum were enrolled in this study. Patients received 120 mg of monthly Denosumab and additional doses on days 8th and 15th of treatment. Images of patients before and after treatment were evaluated. Nine patients with a median age of 30 years with spine and sacrum GCTB were included in this study. The median time of treatment with denosumab was 28 months (range: 3-67). Tumor control was seen in all patients. According to Inverse Choi density/size (ICDS), criteria objective response (complete response and partial response) was seen in 8 patients, and one had stable disease. Based on CT scan images, in 4 patients (44.44%), less than 50% of the transverse diameter of the tumor became ossified, and in the other five patients (55.55%), more than 50% of the tumor's transverse diameter became ossified. The median tumor volume before treatment was 829 cm3, and after treatment was 504 cm3 which was significantly reduced (P = 0.005). No complication related to therapy was seen. Tumor response was seen in all patients, and tumor control according to ICDS criteria was evident in all cases. This finding was in line with previous studies. Clinical improvement of signs and symptoms was also seen in all patients. Generally, our study demonstrates a sustained clinical benefit and tumor response with Denosumab, as tumor response ≥ 24 weeks was evident in all cases. No side effects were seen in patients despite long-term treatment with Denosumab.

Unusual Presentation of a Giant Cell Tumor of the Bone: A Case Report

Bone giant cell tumors (GCTs) are rare, non-cancerous tumors that mostly affect the meta-epiphyseal region of long bones in the legs and arms. We are reporting a case of GCT of bone of a 14-year-old male; it usually occurs in the age group of 20-40 years. The presence of multinucleated giant cells and stromal cells in the proximal diaphysis of the left tibia serves as a distinguishing characteristic. The majority of GCTs are benign; they have the potential to induce bone loss and can be locally aggressive. Treatment options often include surgery, and in some cases, medications like denosumab may be used to help shrink the tumor or manage recurrent cases.

The Role of En Bloc Resection in the Modern Era for Primary Spine Tumors

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of benign and malignant primary spine tumors and a balanced analysis of the benefits and limitations of (and alternatives to) surgical treatment with en bloc resection.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Primary spine tumors are rare but have the potential to cause severe morbidity, either from the disease itself or as a result of treatment. The prognosis, goals, and treatment options vary significantly with the specific disease entity. Appropriate initial management is critical; inappropriate surgery before definitive treatment can lead to recurrence and may render the patient incurable, as salvage options are often inferior.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed database for articles relevant to primary spine neoplasms and en bloc spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed.

RESULTS

Although Enneking-appropriate en bloc surgery can be highly morbid, it often provides the greatest chance for local control and/or patient survival. However, there is growing data to support modern radiotherapy as a feasible and less morbid approach to certain primary neoplasms that historically were considered radioresistant.

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing the optimal approach to primary spine tumors is complex. A comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of the evidence is required to guide patient care and to balance the often-competing goals of prolonging life and preserving quality of life.

Multimodality imaging of an unusual giant cell tumor of thoracic spine with mediastinal invasion: a case report

Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a benign yet locally aggressive bone neoplasm typically situated in the juxta-articular metaphysis of long bones. Although spinal involvement is rare, it is predominantly reported in the axial skeleton, with the sacrum being the primary location. Conversely, GCTs are notably uncommon in the thoracic spine. In this report, we present computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 2-Deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) multimodality imaging findings of a 36-year-old woman diagnosed with a GCT of the thoracic spine. CT scans provide a precise evaluation of cortical thinning and penetration. While MRI lacks specific diagnostic indicators for GCT, it remains invaluable for delineating the extent of soft tissue expansion and the tumor's relationship with intraspinal neural elements - critical information for surgical planning. 18F-FDG PET/CT effectively illustrates the lesion's hypermetabolic and locally aggressive characteristics. It is noteworthy that GCT occasionally exhibits metastatic malignant potential, underscoring the value of FDG PET as a pivotal modality for staging, restaging, or assessing therapy response, and for monitoring the efficacy of radiotherapy. Familiarity with the imaging features of GCT is essential for physicians to avoid misinterpretation. This tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis of spinal tumors, distinguishing it from bone metastases or neurogenic tumors.

Revisiting En Bloc Resection Versus Piecemeal Resection for the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine

OBJECTIVE

Surgery for spinal giant cell tumors (GCTs) is challenging because these tumors often exhibit a poor clinical course owing to their locally aggressive features. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of GCT recurrence in the spine by focusing on surgical factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent surgery for spinal GCTs between January 2005 and December 2016. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, surgical variables were evaluated for disease-free survival (DFS). Since tumor violation may occur at the pedicle during en bloc resection of the spine, it was further analyzed as a separate variable. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed for other clinical and radiographic variables. A total of 28 patients (male:female = 8:20) were included. The mean follow-up period was 90.5 months (range, 15-184 months).

RESULTS

Among the 28 patients, gross total resection (GTR) was the most important factor for DFS (P = 0.001). Any form of tumor violation was also correlated with DFS (P = 0.049); however, use of en bloc resection technique did not show a significant DFS gain compared to piecemeal resection (P = 0.218). In the patient group that achieved GTR, the mode of resection was not a significant factor for DFS (P = 0.959). In the multivariate analysis, the extent of resection was the only significant variable that affected DFS (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Conflicting results on tumor violation from univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that GTR without tumor violation should be the treatment goal for spinal GCTs. However, when tumor violation is unavoidable, it would be important to prioritize GTR over adhering to en bloc resection.

Current therapies and future prospective for locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors

Locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of soft tissue and bone tumors with intermediate histology, incompletely understood biology, and highly variable natural history. Despite having a limited to absent ability to metastasize and excellent survival prognosis, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors can be symptomatic, require prolonged and repeat treatments including surgery and chemotherapy, and can severely impact patients' quality of life. The management of locally aggressive tumors has evolved over the years with a focus on minimizing morbid treatments. Extensive oncologic surgeries and radiation are pillars of care for high grade sarcomas, however, play a more limited role in management of locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors, due to propensity for local recurrence despite resection, and the risk of transformation to a higher-grade entity following radiation. Patients should ideally be evaluated in specialized sarcoma centers that can coordinate complex multimodal decision-making, taking into consideration the individual patient's clinical presentation and history, as well as any available prognostic factors into customizing therapy. In this review, we aim to discuss the biology, clinical management, and future treatment frontiers for three representative locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors: desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) and giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). These entities challenge clinicians with their unpredictable behavior and responses to treatment, and still lack a well-defined standard of care despite recent progress with newly approved or promising experimental drugs.

An improved total en bloc spondylectomy for L5 vertebral giant cell tumor through a single-stage posterior approach

PURPOSE

Although total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is strongly recommended for spinal giant cell tumor (GCT), it is extremely difficult to excise a L5 neoplasm intactly through the single-stage posterior approach. Given the risk of neurological and vascular injury, intralesional curettage (IC) is usually recommended for the treatment of L5 GCT. In this study, we presented our experience with the use of an improved TES to treat L5 GCT through the single-stage posterior approach.

METHODS

This study included 20 patients with L5 GCT who received surgical treatment in our department between September 2010 and April 2021. Of them, seven patients received improved TES without iliac osteotomy, and the other 13 patients received IC (n = 8), sagittal en bloc resection (n = 1), TES with iliac osteotomy (n = 3), and TES with radicotomy (n = 1) as control.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 331.43 ± 92.95 min for improved TES group and 365.77 ± 85.17 min for the control group (p = 0.415), with the mean blood loss of 1142.86 ± 340.87 ml vs. 1969.23 ± 563.30 ml (p = 0.002). Postoperative treatment included bisphosphonates in nine patients and denosumab in 12 patients including one patient who changed from bisphosphonates to denosumab. Three patients who received IC experienced local recurrence, and no relapse was observed in improved TES group.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage posterior TES for L5 GCT was previously considered impossible. In this study, we presented our experience with the use of an improved surgical technique for L5 TES through the single-stage posterior approach, which has proved to be superior to the conventional procedures in terms of blood loss control and complication and recurrence rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Giant cell tumor of sacral vertebra in an adolescent without neurodeficit: A case report and review of the literature

Background:

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) are locally aggressive benign primary bone tumors that rarely occur in the spine. Their treatment methods include denosumab, bisphosphonates, and/or different surgical techniques. Here, we present the successful treatment of a sacral GCT in a 13 years old.

Case Description:

A 13-year-old male presented with back pain and paraparesis of 3-week duration. Radiological studies demonstrated an S1 lytic lesion. He underwent an excisional biopsy and anterior and posterior resection combined with a lumbopelvic fusion. One year later, there has been no tumor recurrence.

Conclusion:

We successfully treated an S1 sacral GCT in a 13-year-old male utilizing a wide anteriorand posterior excision combined with a lumbopelvic fusion.

A novel three-dimensional-printed patient-specific sacral implant for spinopelvic reconstruction in sacral giant cell tumour

PURPOSE

Spinopelvic reconstruction after sacral tumour resection is one of the most demanding procedures in sacral tumour surgery. The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of spinopelvic reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses in sacral giant cell tumours and the clinical outcomes and complications at follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed ten consecutive patients with giant cell tumors of the sacrum who underwent intralesional nerve-sparing resection with curative intent and custom implant reconstruction between 2016 and 2021. There were four males and six females with a mean age of 40.2 years (range, 25-62 years) at surgery. A computer-aided-design implant was prepared using 3D printing technology that was both matched to the bone defect and biomechanically evaluated. A 3D-printed surgical guide was used to replicate the resection procedure as planned. We analyzed operational outcomes, oncological outcomes, functional outcomes, complications, and prosthetic outcomes. Pain at rest was assessed according to a 10-cm VAS score. The results of functional improvement were evaluated using the MSTS-93 score at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients were observed for 26 to 61 months, with an average follow-up of 43.8 months. No deep infection or prosthetic structural failure occurred in this study. A total of 80% of patients had good neurological function and normal urinary, bowel, and ambulatory functions. The mean MSTS score was 24.1 (range, 22-26). The mean VAS score was 2 (range 0 to 2). Delayed wound healing occurred in three patients, and the wounds healed after debridement. One case had local recurrence and survived tumour-free after resection of the recurrent lesion. An aseptic loosening was found in a patient that did not require secondary surgery. By radiographical assessments, we found that 90% of implants were well osseointegrated at the final follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D-printed sacral implants might provide a promising strategy for spinopelvic reconstruction in sacral giant cell tumours undergoing intralesional nerve-sparing surgery with satisfactory clinical outcomes, osseointegration, and excellent durability.

Tumor Growth Rate in Spinal Giant Cell Tumors of Bone and Association With the Immune Microenvironment and Denosumab Treatment Responsiveness: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Currently, little is known about the prognostic value of tumor growth rate (TGR) in spinal giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation of TGR with clinicopathological features, immune microenvironment, prognosis, and response to denosumab treatment of spinal GCTB.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients with spinal GCTB treated at 5 centers from 2011 to 2021 were included. TGR was assessed by 2 independent neuroradiologists using at least 2 preoperative thin-section magnetic resonance imaging scans at a minimum interval of 2 months. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, PD-1, PD-L1, and Foxp3. Then, these parameters were analyzed for their associations with patient outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival), clinicopathological features, and denosumab treatment responsiveness.

RESULTS

High TGR predicted both poor progression-free survival and overall survival (both P < .001). In addition, TGR was associated with postoperative neurological dysfunction ( P < .001), Enneking staging ( P = .016), denosumab treatment responsiveness ( P = .035), and the number of CD3 + ( P < .001), PD-1 + ( P = .009), PD-L1 + ( P < .001), and FoxP3 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte ( P = .02). Importantly, TGR outperformed the traditional Enneking, Campanacci, and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems in predicting the clinical outcomes of spinal GCTB.

CONCLUSION

These data support the use of TGR as a reliable predictive tool for clinically relevant outcomes and response to denosumab therapy of spinal GCTB, which may be helpful in guiding prognostic risk stratification and therapeutic optimization of patients.

Management of a rare giant cell tumor of the distal fibula: A case report

BACKGROUND

Aggressive giant cell tumor of the distal fibula is so rare that no consensus on a surgical strategy has been reached. Thus, an appropriate treatment strategy is still important to discuss.

CASE SUMMARY

A 61-year-old man who had been experiencing progressive swelling of the left lateral malleolus accompanied by pain for half a year was presented at our hospital. He had never been treated prior to coming to our hospital. Preoperative imaging revealed a 10 cm × 6 cm mass located in the body of the distal fibula. Pathological biopsies confirmed it was a giant cell tumor. Preoperative examination revealed he had dilated cardiomyopathy with class 3 cardiac function. The cardiologist and anesthesiologist determined that he could tolerate the operation, but the operation should be as short and minimally invasive as possible. With the patient’s consent, we performed a tibiotalar fusion and followed up with him for 2 years, finding no recurrence and a satisfactory recovery.

CONCLUSION

Tibial talus fusion is an effective method for the treatment of distal fibula tumors.

Comparison of the prognostic factors of total en bloc spondylectomy and total piecemeal spondylectomy in patients with Enneking stage III giant cell tumor in the thoracic and lumbar spine

PURPOSE

To compare total en bloc spondylectomy with marginal margins against piecemeal spondylectomy with intralesional margins in the surgical treatment of Enneking stage III spinal giant cell tumor (GCT) in terms of local recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective survival analysis of patients with Enneking stage III GCT who underwent TES with marginal margins or total piecemeal spondylectomy with intralesional margins was performed between January 2006 and April 2020. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was the time between the date of surgery and recurrence. Factors with p-values < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis using proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (25 men and 35 women) with a mean age of 35.6 (range 11-71) years were included. The mean follow-up duration was 93 (range 24-198) months. Two patients were lost to follow-up 6 and 14 years after the procedure. Over a 10-year period, the recurrence rate was 13.3%. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year LRFS rates were 95%, 88%, and 78%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified total piecemeal spondylectomy and no adjuvant radiotherapy as prognostic factors for LRFS. Multivariate Cox-regression models showed a significant association between local recurrence and total piecemeal spondylectomy and no adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

TES with marginal margins is better than total piecemeal spondylectomy with intralesional margins owing to its lower postoperative recurrence rate. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be administered to reduce postoperative recurrence rates.

Characterization and Treatment of Spinal Tumors

The prevalence of spinal tumors is rare in comparison to brain tumors which encompass most central nervous system tumors. Tumors of the spine can be divided into primary and metastatic tumors with the latter being the most common presentation. Primary tumors are subdivided based on their location on the spinal column and in the spinal cord into intramedullary, intradural extramedullary, and primary bone tumors. Back pain is a common presentation in spine cancer patients; however, other radicular pain may be present. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for intradural extramedullary and intramedullary tumors. Plain radiographs are used in the initial diagnosis of primary bone tumors while Computed tomography (CT) and MRI may often be necessary for further characterization. Complete surgical resection is the treatment of choice for spinal tumors and may be curative for well circumscribed lesions. However, intralesional resection along with adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy can be indicated for patients that would experience increased morbidity from damage to nearby neurological structures caused by resection with wide margins. Even with the current treatment options, the prognosis for aggressive spinal cancer remains poor. Advances in novel treatments including molecular targeting, immunotherapy and stem cell therapy provide the potential for greater control of malignant and metastatic tumors of the spine.

Progress on Denosumab Use in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Dose and Duration of Therapy

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an aggressive non-cancerous bone tumor associated with risks of sarcoma and metastasis. Once malignancy occurs, the prognosis is generally poor. Surgery remains the main treatment for GCTB. Multidisciplinary management is a feasible option for patients wherein surgical resection is not an option or for those with serious surgery-related complications. Denosumab is an anti-nuclear factor kappa B ligand approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, bone metastases, and advanced or inoperable GCTB. However, the guidelines for treating GCTB are unclear; its short-term efficacy and safety in inoperable patients have been demonstrated. Lengthier therapies (high cumulative doses) or pre-operative adjuvant therapy may be associated with severe complications and high local recurrence rates. Short-term administration helps attain satisfactory local control and functionality. As a result, lately, the impact of different doses and lengths of treatment on the efficacy of denosumab in GCTB treatment, the incidence of complications, and recurrence rates have gained attention. The efficacy and safety of denosumab against GCTB, its impact on imaging assessment, related complications, and recurrence of GCTB were previously reviewed. For further research direction, this paper reviews the progress of studies evaluating the impact of the dose and duration of denosumab therapy for GCTB.

Prognostic Value and Quantitative CT Analysis in RANKL Expression of Spinal GCTB in the Denosumab Era: A Machine Learning Approach

The receptor activator of the nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) is the therapeutic target of denosumab. In this study, we evaluated whether radiomics signature and machine learning analysis can predict RANKL status in spinal giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB). This retrospective study consisted of 107 patients, including a training set (n = 82) and a validation set (n = 25). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to validate the prognostic value of RANKL status. Radiomic feature extraction of three heterogeneous regions (VOIentire, VOIedge, and VOIcore) from pretreatment CT were performed. Followed by feature selection using Selected K Best and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis, three classifiers (random forest (RF), support vector machine, and logistic regression) were used to build models. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, F1 score, recall, precision, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the models' performance. Classification of 75 patients with eligible follow-up based on RANKL status resulted in a significant difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.035). VOIcore-based RF classifier performs best. Using this model, the AUCs for the training and validation cohorts were 0.880 and 0.766, respectively. In conclusion, a machine learning approach based on CT radiomic features could discriminate prognostically significant RANKL status in spinal GCTB, which may ultimately aid clinical decision-making.

Comprehensive treatment outcomes of giant cell tumor of the spine: A retrospective study

There is no consensus on a treatment strategy for spinal giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) because of the difficulty in their treatment. Treatment options often include the use of the controversial denosumab, an antibody therapy aimed at tumor shrinkage, different curettage techniques, resection, or a combination of these therapies. The current study aimed to identify treatment methods associated with favorable outcomes in patients with spinal GCTB. We retrospectively reviewed 5 patients with spinal GCTB, including patients with tumors of the sacrum, treated at our hospital between September 2011 and November 2020. Two men and 3 women were included in the study. The median follow-up period was 74 months (range: 14-108 months). We surveyed the tumor site, treatment method, denosumab use, and outcomes. The median age was 17 years (range: 17-42 years). There were 2 cases of sacral GCTB and 1 case each of lumbar, cervical, and thoracic vertebral GCTB. The comorbidities observed included hepatitis, malignant lymphoma, atopic dermatitis, and asthma. The treatment method included zoledronic acid after embolization and denosumab, denosumab only, curettage and posterior fusion, and curettage resection after embolization and anterior and posterior fusion. Denosumab was used in all cases. Three patients were continuously disease-free, 1 patient with no evidence of disease, and 1 patient alive with disease. Aggressive treatment, especially surgical treatment, may lead to good results in spinal GCTB.

Updated concepts in treatment of giant cell tumor of bone

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are intermediate, locally aggressive primary bone tumors. For conventional GCTB, surgery remains treatment of choice. For advanced GCTB, a more important role came into play for systemic therapy including denosumab and bisphosphonates over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

In diagnostics, focus has been on H3F3A (G34) driver mutations present in GCTB. The most frequent mutation (G34W) can be detected using immunohistochemistry and is highly specific in differentiating GCTB from other giant cell containing tumors. PD-L1 expression can be used as biological marker to predict higher recurrence risks in GCTB patients.The use of bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement is under investigation in a randomized controlled trial. A new technique consisting of percutaneous microwave ablation and bisphosphonate-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cementoplasty was proposed for unresectable (pelvic) GCTB.Increased experience with use of denosumab raised concern on elevated recurrence rates. However, conclusions of meta-analyses should be interpreted with risk of indication bias in mind. Several small studies are published with short-course denosumab (varying from 3 to 6 doses). One small trial directly compared denosumab and zoledronic acid, with no statistical differences in radiological and clinical outcome, and nonsignificantly higher recurrence rate after denosumab. As bisphosphonates directly target neoplastic stromal cells in GCTB, larger directly comparative trials are still warranted.

SUMMARY

Neoadjuvant denosumab is highly effective for advanced GCTB, and a short-course is advised to facilitate surgery, whereas increased recurrence rates remain of concern. Randomized controlled trials are conducted on bisphosphonate-loaded bone cement and on optimal dose and duration of neoadjuvant denosumab. PD-L1 could be a potential new therapy target in GCTB.

Ultra-Short Course of Neo-Adjuvant Denosumab for Nerve-Sparing Surgery for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in Sacrum

STUDY DEIGN

This was a retrospective study about sacral giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether ultra-short course of neo-adjuvant denosumab treatment for sacral GCTB could (1) induce radiological and histological response? (2) Facilitate nerve-sparing surgery? (3) Achieve satisfactory oncological and functional outcomes?

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous reports on long course of neo-adjuvant denosumab treatment for GCTB showed significant tumor response and a relatively high recurrent rate after curettage.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with sacral GCTB treated with neoadjuvant denosumab and nerve-sparing surgery were categorized into ultra-short course group (≤3 doses and operation within D21 since 1st dose, 41 patients) or conventional group (>3 doses or operation after D21 since 1st dose, 25 patients). The radiological and histological response, operative data, oncological and functional outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The ultra-short course group demonstrated fewer doses of neo-adjuvant denosumab (mean: 2.1 vs. 4.8, P  < 0.001) and shorter time to surgery (12.2 days vs. 72.3 days, P < 0.001). Similar patterns of radiological and histological response were observed in the two groups with less fibrosis and ossification in the ultra-short course group. The operative duration (199.9 min vs. 187.8 min, P = 0.364) and estimated blood loss (1552.4 mL vs. 1474.0 mL, P = 0.740) were comparable. Most (94.8%) of the patients received adjuvant denosumab. After a mean follow-up of 29.4 months, three cases (8.8%) and five cases (20.8%) showed local recurrence in each group (P = 0.255). The estimated recurrence-free survival (56.2 vs. 51.2 months, P = 0.210) and the functional status [Motor-Urination-Defecation scores: 25.9 vs. 25.7, P = 0.762] did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Ultra-short course of neo-adjuvant denosumab for sacral GCTB could elicit radiological and histological responses as conventional course did. The less degree of fibrosis and ossification might facilitate nerve-sparing surgery and help to achieve satisfactory local control and functional status.Level of Evidence: 4.

Total neurological recovery after surgical decompression and treatment with denosumab of large unresectable spinal giant cell tumour expanding to mediastinum

There is a controversy over the medical treatment of unresectable spinal giant cell tumour (GCT) regarding dosing and duration. We studied a spinal GCT case that had expanded to the thoracic spinal canal and mediastinum and was successfully treated by surgical decompression and denosumab. A woman in her 30s presented with weakness in both the lower extremities. MRI revealed a large tumour in the posterior mediastinum expanding from the thoracic vertebrae (T3–6), which compressed the spinal cord. The patient underwent urgent spinal decompression with instrumentation and her tissue was sent for a pathology study. Histologically and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of GCT. Since it was an unresectable tumour, this patient was treated with denosumab. Her neurological problem resolved after 6 months of treatment. After 4 years of follow-up, the patient displayed no further progression and no side effects from long-term denosumab usage.

Evaluating the Optimal Management of Inoperable Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Spine giant cell tumors (SGCTs) are intermediate malignant bone tumors, sometimes aggressive and responsible for debilitating axial pain and sensorimotor impairments. Non-surgical therapies, including denosumab, radiotherapy, and selective arterial embolization (SAE), have shown promising results in the treatment of patients with inoperable SGCTs. In this systematic review, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the current literature on denosumab, radiotherapy, and SAE for inoperable SGCTs, comparing treatment outcomes and complications using a random-effect model meta-analysis. We found that all three treatments were equally effective in providing symptom improvement and radiological tumor response, also showing low and comparable rates of treatment-related complications. Patients treated with denosumab showed lower rates of local recurrences and distant metastases.

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection remains the preferred treatment in spine giant cell tumors (SGCTs), but it is not always feasible. Conservative strategies have been studied for inoperable cases. We systematically reviewed the literature on inoperable SGCTs treated with denosumab, radiotherapy or selective arterial embolization (SAE). Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science, Ovid-EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to include studies of inoperable SGCTs treated with denosumab, radiotherapy or SAE. Treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared with a random-effect model meta-analysis. Results: Among the 17 studies included, 128 patients received denosumab, 59 radiotherapy, and 43 SAE. No significant differences in baseline patient characteristics were found between the three groups. All strategies were equally effective in providing symptom improvement (p = 0.187, I² = 0%) and reduction in tumor volume (p = 0.738, I² = 56.8%). Rates of treatment-related complications were low (denosumab: 12.5%; radiotherapy: 8.5%; SAE: 18.6%) and comparable (p = 0.311, I² = 0%). Patients receiving denosumab had significantly lower rates of local tumor recurrence (10.9%) and distant metastases (0%) compared to patients receiving radiotherapy (30.5%; 8.5%) or SAE (35.6%; 7%) (p = 0.003, I² = 32%; p = 0.002, I² = 47%). Denosumab was also correlated with significantly higher overall survival rates at 18 months (99.2%) and 24 months (99.2%) compared to radiotherapy (91.5%; 89.6%) and SAE (92.5%; 89.4%) (p = 0.019, I² = 8%; p = 0.004, I² = 23%). Mortality was higher in patients receiving SAE (20.9%) or radiotherapy (13.6%) compared to denosumab (0.8%) (p < 0.001), but deaths mostly occurred for unrelated diseases. Conclusions: Denosumab, radiotherapy, and SAE are safe and effective for inoperable SGCTs. Clinical and radiological outcomes are mostly comparable, but denosumab may provide superior tumor control.

Study of imaging changes following preoperative denosumab for giant cell tumor of bone

•

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply.

•

The decrease of blood supply was the most significant in the initial stage of treatment.

•

It is not recommended to apply denosumab long before surgical treatment.

Background

The changes in the characteristics of the tumor blood supply of giant cell tumor of bone over time after treatment with denosumab remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in the blood supply imaging characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone after preoperative denosumab treatment and to provide evidence for evaluating the reasonable time for preoperative treatment.

Methods

A total of 59 patients with giant cell tumor of bone who were treated in our hospital from 2014 to 2019 were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent enhanced CT examination of the tumor site before denosumab treatment and every month after treatment. The plain CT value and enhanced CT value of the tumor were measured, and the CT enhancement rate of the tumor was calculated. The change in the CT enhancement rate of the tumor over time after denosumab treatment was analyzed.

Results

The average tumor enhancement rates were 2.14 (1.22–4.05), 1.60 (1.12–2.53), 1.38 (1.02–2.24), and 1.25 (1–2.11) before denosumab treatment and one month, three months, and six months after treatment, respectively. After denosumab treatment, the average monthly CT enhancement rate decreased as follows: 0.54 (25.2%) in the first month, 0.11 (5.15%) in the second to third months, and 0.04 (1.87%) in the fourth to sixth months. The tumor enhancement rate was no longer significantly reduced three months post-treatment. There was a significant correlation between the reduction in the CT enhancement rate and the initial CT enhancement rate (P = 0.000).

Conclusion

The preoperative application of denosumab can reduce tumor blood supply. The decrease in the blood supply is the most significant in the initial stage of treatment. Following treatment, the decrease in the blood supply gradually reduces over time. Therefore, for the purpose of reducing intra-operative bleeding and facilitating surgery, application of denosumab treatment is not recommended more than three months before surgery.

Role of denosumab before resection and reconstruction in giant cell tumors of bone: a single-centered retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Denosumab has been approved by Food and Drug Authority in 2013 for use in surgically unresectable Giant cell tumor (GCT) to achieve resectable tumor margins. The aim of this study is to investigate the functional outcome and surgical convenience with the use of neoadjuvant denosumab before resection and reconstruction in Campanacci grade III GCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 70 cases of Campanacci grade III GCT receiving resection and reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019. They were stratified into two groups: one group of 29 patients received once-weekly denosumab 120 mg for 4-weeks before resection and reconstruction, while the other group of 41 patients did not receive denosumab before resection and reconstruction. Quality of life by musculoskeletal tumor society score where 0-7 means poor, 8-14 means fair, 15-22 means good; above 22 means excellent, incidence of tumor recurrence, intraoperative duration in minutes and postoperative positive margins were assessed for each cohort after 12 months follow-up.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in musculoskeletal tumor society score (25.75 vs. 27.41; P  = 0.178), incidence of recurrence (3.45% vs. 4.88%; P  < 0.001), and postoperative positive margins (10.34% vs. 4.88%; P  = 0.38) for both groups. However, the intraoperative duration (133.38 vs. 194.49; P  < 0.001) was significantly higher in the non-denosumab group compared with denosumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant denosumab is equally effective considering postoperative functional outcomes and surgical convenience except intraoperative duration where it is highly helpful in saving the operating time duration. Easier identification, resection and lesser reconstruction are the key surgical convenience offered by neoadjuvant denosumab.