1
|
Wague A, O'Donnell JM, Stroud S, Filley A, Rangwalla K, Baldwin A, El Naga AN, Gendelberg D, Berven S. Association between opioid utilization and patient-reported outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery. Spine J 2024; 24:1183-1191. [PMID: 38365008 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), created by the National institute of Health, is a reliable and valid survey for patients with lumbar spine pathology. Preoperative opioid use has been shown to be an important predictor variable of self-reported health status in legacy patient-reported outcome measures. PURPOSE To investigate the impact of chronic preoperative opiate use on PROMIS survey scores. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE Between March 2019 and November 2021, 227 patients underwent lumbar decompression ± ≤ 2 level fusion. Fifty-seven patients (25.11%) had chronic preoperative opioid use. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry disability index (ODI) and PROMIS survey scores. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single center patient-reported outcome database was performed with a minimum of 2 year follow-up. PROMIS Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Pain Interference (PI), Physical Function (PF), Sleep disturbance (SD), and Social Roles (SR) surveys were recorded at preoperative intake with subsequent follow-up at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients were grouped into chronic opioid users as defined by >6-month duration of use. Differences in mean survey scores were evaluated using Welch t-tests. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty-seven patients met our inclusion criteria of completed PROMIS surveys at the designated timepoints. A total of 57 (25.11%) were chronic opioid users (COU) prior to surgery. Analysis of patient-reported health outcomes shows that long term opioid use correlated with worse ODI and PROMIS scores at baseline compared to nonchronic users (NOU). At 1 and 2 year follow-up, the COU cohort continued to have significantly worse ODI, PROMIS Fatigue, PF, PI, SD, and SR scores. There is a statistical difference in the magnitude of change in health status between the 2 cohorts at 1 year follow-up in PROMIS Depression (-5.04±7.88 vs -2.49±8.73, p=.042), PF (6.25±7.11 vs 9.03±9.04, p=.019), and PI (-7.40±7.37 vs -10.58±9.87, p=.011) and 2 year follow-up in PROMIS PF (5.58±6.84 vs 7.99±9.64, p=.041) and PI (-6.71±8.32 vs -9.62±10.06, p=.032). Mean improvement in PROMIS scores for the COU cohort at 2 year follow-up exceeded minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in all domains except PROMIS Depression, SR and SD. CONCLUSION Patients with chronic opioid use status have worse baseline PROMIS scores compared with patients who had nonchronic use. However, patients in the COU cohort displayed clinically significant postoperative improvement in multiple PROMIS domains. These results show that patients with chronic opioid use can benefit greatly from surgical intervention and will allow physicians to better set expectations with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aboubacar Wague
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Jennifer M O'Donnell
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Sarah Stroud
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Anna Filley
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Khuzaima Rangwalla
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Avionna Baldwin
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Ashraf N El Naga
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
| | - David Gendelberg
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
| | - Sigurd Berven
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wolf JC, Kaul A, Anwar FN, Roca AM, Khosla I, Loya AC, Medakkar SS, Federico VP, Sayari AJ, Lopez GD, Singh K. Do Six-Week Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression? World Neurosurg 2024; 185:e900-e906. [PMID: 38458252 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little research has been done to evaluate the prognostic value of short-term postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on long-term PROs following lumbar decompression (LD). We evaluated the prognostic value of short-term PROs on long-term PROs through 2 years after LD. METHODS A single spine surgeon database was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing primary LD with 6-week postoperative PROs reported. The demographics, perioperative traits, and preoperative, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year PROs were recorded. The PROs included the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, PRO measure information system for physical function (PROMIS-PF), and Oswestry disability index. Two-step multivariate linear regression was performed to determine the predictive value of 6-week PROs for the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year PROs. RESULTS A total of 277 patients were included. The 6-week Oswestry disability index, VAS for leg pain, and 9-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) are all positive predictors for their respective outcomes at 6 months. Additionally, the 6-week PROMIS-PF was a negative predictor of the 6-month PHQ-9. The 6-week PROMIS-PF positively predicted the PROMIS-PF through 1 year, and the PHQ-9 was a positive predictor of the PHQ-9 at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The 6-week postoperative PROs are predictive of the same outcomes at 6 months, the PROMIS-PF is predictive through 1 year, and the PHQ-9 is predictive through 2 years. Determining the predictive value of early postoperative PROs can be helpful in understanding the likely postoperative trajectory following LD and informing patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Wolf
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aayush Kaul
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Fatima N Anwar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrea M Roca
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ishan Khosla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alexandra C Loya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Srinath S Medakkar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arash J Sayari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gregory D Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaikh HJF, Cady-McCrea CI, Menga EN, Haddas R, Molinari RN, Mesfin A, Rubery PT, Puvanesarajah V. Clinical Improvement After Lumbar Fusion: Using PROMIS to Assess Recovery Kinetics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:601-608. [PMID: 37163645 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a single institution cohort. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study is to identify features that predict delayed achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) following elective lumbar spine fusion using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Preoperative prediction of delayed recovery following lumbar spine fusion surgery is challenging. While many studies have examined factors impacting the achievement of MCID for patient-reported outcomes in similar cohorts, few studies have assessed predictors of early functional improvement. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing elective one-level posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. Patients were subdivided into two groups based on achievement of MCID for each respective PROMIS domain either before six months ("early responders") or after six months ("late responders") following surgical intervention. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine features associated with odds of achieving distribution-based MCID before or after six months follow up. RESULTS 147 patients were included. The average age was 64.3±13.0 years. At final follow-up, 57.1% of patients attained MCID for PI and 72.8% for PF. However, 42 patients (49.4%) reached MCID for PI by six months, compared to 44 patients (41.1%) for PF. Patients with severe symptoms had the highest probability of attaining MCID for PI (OR 10.3; P =0.001) and PF (OR 10.4; P =0.001) Preoperative PROMIS symptomology did not predict early achievement of MCID for PI or PF. Patients who received concomitant iliac crest autograft during their lumbar fusion had increased odds of achieving MCID for PI (OR 8.56; P =0.001) before six months. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that the majority of patients achieved MCID following elective one-level lumbar spine fusion at long-term follow-up, although less than half achieved this clinical benchmark for each PROMIS metric by six months. We also found that preoperative impairment was not associated with when patients would achieve MCID. Further prospective investigations are warranted to characterize the trajectory of clinical improvement and identify the risk factors associated with poor outcomes more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hashim J F Shaikh
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics & Physical Performance, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baxter SN, Johnson AH, Brennan JC, MacDonald JH, Turcotte JJ, King PJ. Social vulnerability adversely affects emergency-department utilization but not patient-reported outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144:1803-1811. [PMID: 38206446 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05186-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple studies demonstrate social deprivation is associated with inferior outcomes after total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty; its effect on patient-reported outcomes is debated. The primary objective of this study evaluated the relationship between social vulnerability and the PROMIS-PF measure in patients undergoing THA and TKA. A secondary aim compared social vulnerability between patients who required increased resource utilization or experienced complications and those who didn't. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of 537 patients from March 2020 to February 2022 was performed. The Centers for Disease Control Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) were used to quantify socioeconomic disadvantage. The cohort was split into THA and TKA populations; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05. RESULTS 48.6% of patients achieved PROMIS-PF MCID at 1-year postoperatively. Higher levels of overall social vulnerability (0.40 vs. 0.28, p = 0.03) were observed in TKA patients returning to the ED within 90-days of discharge. Increased overall SVI (OR = 9.18, p = 0.027) and household characteristics SVI (OR = 9.57, p = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 90-day ED returns after TKA. In THA patients, increased vulnerability in the household type and transportation dimension was observed in patients requiring 90-day ED returns (0.51 vs. 0.37, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Despite an increased risk for 90-day ED returns, patients with increased social vulnerability still obtain good 1-year functional outcomes. Initiatives seeking to mitigate the effect of social deprivation on TJA outcomes should aim to provide safe alternatives to ED care during early recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha N Baxter
- Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc, 2000 Medical Parkway, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA
| | - Andrea H Johnson
- Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc, 2000 Medical Parkway, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA
| | - Jane C Brennan
- Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc, 2000 Medical Parkway, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA
| | - James H MacDonald
- Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc, 2000 Medical Parkway, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA
| | - Justin J Turcotte
- Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc, 2000 Medical Parkway, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA.
| | - Paul J King
- Anne Arundel Medical Center Inc, 2000 Medical Parkway, Annapolis, MD, 21401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anwar FN, Roca AM, Loya AC, Medakkar SS, Nie JW, Hartman TJ, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Federico VP, Sayari AJ, Lopez GD, Singh K. The influence of preoperative Veterans RAND-12 physical composite score in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion [Retrospective Review]. J Clin Neurosci 2024; 123:36-40. [PMID: 38522109 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
No study has evaluated the preoperative impact of Veterans RAND-12 Physical Composite Score (VR-12 PCS) on anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) patients. This study examines its influence on physical function, mental health, pain, and disability outcomes. Two cohorts of ALIF patients with preoperative VR-12 PCS scores were formed using a single-surgeon registry: VR-12 PCS < 30 and VR-12 PCS ≥ 30. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected. PROMs of VR-12 PCS/Mental Composite Score (MCS), Short Form-12 (SF-12) PCS/MCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale-Back/Leg Pain (VAS-BP/LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected pre/postoperatively up to 2-years. Demographics, perioperative characteristics, and preoperative PROMs were compared. Intercohort postoperative 6-week/final PROMs and improvements were compared. Of 80 patients, there were 41 in the VR-12 PCS < 30 cohort. Besides VR-12 PCS, VR-12 PCS < 30 patients reported inferior preoperative VR-12 MCS/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF/PHQ-9/ODI scores (p ≤ 0.003, all). At 6-weeks postoperatively, VR-12 PCS < 30 reported inferior VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF/PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.030, all). There was greater improvement up to 6-weeks postoperatively in VR-12 PCS < 30 for VR-12 PCS/MCS and SF-12 PCS (p ≤ 0.020, all). VR-12 PCS < 30 reported superior improvement by final follow-up in VR-12 PCS/SF-12 PCS/PHQ-9 (p ≤ 0.006, all). MCID achievement rates were higher in VR-12 PCS < 30 for PHQ-9 and ODI (p ≤ 0.013, both). VR-12 PCS < 30 patients reported inferior postoperative physical function, mental health, and disability, yet superior magnitude of improvement in physical function and mental health. Rates of clinically meaningful improvement for VR-12 PCS < 30 were greater in mental health and disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima N Anwar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Andrea M Roca
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Alexandra C Loya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Srinath S Medakkar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - James W Nie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Timothy J Hartman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Keith R MacGregor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Omolabake O Oyetayo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Eileen Zheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Arash J Sayari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Gregory D Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stephens AR, El-Hassan R, Patel RK. Evaluation of Fluoroscopically Guided Transforaminal Selective Nerve Root Sleeve Injections for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Radiculopathy Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System as an Outcome Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024:S0003-9993(24)00831-1. [PMID: 38430994 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.02.720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the therapeutic effect of transforaminal selective nerve root sleeve injections (TFSNRIs) in a specific subset of patients with clinical symptoms and presentation consistent with spinal stenosis. DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary academic spine center. PARTICIPANTS A total of 176 patients with radicular leg pain with or without low back pain as well as ≥3 clinical features of spinal stenosis and corroborative radiographic features of spinal stenosis on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging without confounding spinal pathology (N=176). INTERVENTIONS Fluoroscopically guided transforaminal selective nerve root sleeve injections. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) v1.2/v2.0, Pain Interference (PI) v1.1, and PROMIS (D) v1.0 were collected at baseline and post-procedure short term (<3-months) and long-term (6-12 month) follow-up. Statistical analysis comparing baseline and postprocedural PROMIS scores was performed. Differences were compared with previously established minimal clinically important differences in the spine population. RESULTS For patients with spinal stenosis treated with TFSNRI, no statistically significant improvement was observed short- and long-term follow-up in PROMIS PF (P=.97, .77) and PROMIS Depression (P=.86, .85) scores. At short-term follow-up, PROMIS PI scores did significantly improve (P=.01) but the average difference of pre- and post-procedure scores did not reach clinical significance. No significant difference in PROMIS PI was noted at long-term follow-up (.75). CONCLUSIONS Although a statistically significant difference was observed for improvement in pain, in this retrospective study, TFSNRI did not provide clinically significant improvement in patients' function, pain, or depression for lumbar spinal stenosis at short- and long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Stephens
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
| | - Ramzi El-Hassan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Rajeev K Patel
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gilat R, Mitchnik IY, Patel S, Dubin JA, Agar G, Tamir E, Lindner D, Beer Y. Pearls and pitfalls of PROMIS clinically significant outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:6617-6629. [PMID: 37436494 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04983-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed as a uniform and generalizable PROM system using item response theory and computer adaptive testing. We aimed to assess the utilization of PROMIS for clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) measurements and provide insights into its use in orthopaedic research. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed PROMIS CSO reports for orthopaedic procedures via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science from inception to 2022, excluding abstracts and missing measurements. Bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and questionnaire compliance. PROMIS domains, CSO measures, and study populations were described. A meta-analysis compared distribution and anchor-based MCIDs in low-bias (NOS ≥ 7) studies. RESULTS Overall, 54 publications from 2016 to 2022 were reviewed. PROMIS CSO studies were observational with increasing publication rates. Evidence-level was II in 10/54, bias low in 51/54, and compliance ≥ 86% in 46/54. Most (28/54) analysed lower extremity procedures. PROMIS domains examined Pain Function (PF) in 44/54, Pain Interference (PI) in 36/54, and Depression (D) in 18/54. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was reported in 51/54 and calculated based on distribution in 39/51 and anchor in 29/51. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and minimal detectable change (MDC) were reported in ≤ 10/54. MCIDs were not significantly greater than MDCs. Anchor-based MCIDs were greater than distribution based MCIDs (standardized mean difference = 0.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS PROMIS CSOs are increasingly utilized, especially for lower extremity procedures assessing the PF, PI, and D domains using distribution-based MCID. Using more conservative anchor-based MCIDs and reporting MDCs may strengthen results. Researchers should consider unique pearls and pitfalls when assessing PROMIS CSOs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Gilat
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Ilan Y Mitchnik
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Military Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sumit Patel
- Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Jeremy A Dubin
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gabriel Agar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Eran Tamir
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dror Lindner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yiftah Beer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Makhni EC, Hennekes ME. The Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice and Clinical Decision Making. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:1059-1066. [PMID: 37364243 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are highly effective measures of quality of care and outcomes that matter to patients regarding their physical, mental, and social health. While PROMs have played a notable role in research and registry reporting, they are also useful as clinical tools. Real-time PROM collection can be integrated into routine clinical care with immediate access to scores within the electronic health record. This can be integral when discussing treatment options and using decision aids. PROM scores can also be useful for postoperative monitoring. Various approaches to quantifying clinical efficacy have been developed, including the minimal clinically important difference, the substantial clinical benefit, and the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). As the patient experience and patient-reported outcome measurement of health-related outcomes become increasingly emphasized in patient-centered, high value care, so too will the importance of methods to gauge clinical benefit using these instruments for improved clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bernstein DN, Baumhauer JF. Operationalizing PROMs at the Musculoskeletal Practice and Policy Levels. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:1088-1095. [PMID: 37311431 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
There continues to be growing interest in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), especially as value-based healthcare initiatives gain more traction. Although it is well-established that PROMs can be useful in clinical research, how to operationalize PROMs in clinical care and policy initiatives remains a "work in progress." Following the design of a comprehensive PROM administration and routine collection system, orthopaedic surgeons and their patients can reap the benefits of PROMs in practice through improved shared clinical decision-making discussions at the individual patient level and closer symptom monitoring on a large scale, with improved resource allocation at the population health level. Although certain government and payer incentives exist to collect PROMs at present, it is reasonable to assume that future policy initiatives will begin to use the actual PROM scores to assess clinical outcomes. Orthopaedic surgeons with interest in this area should prioritize their involvement in policy discussion to ensure PROMs are being used appropriately in novel payment models and policy endeavors so that they are both evaluated and compensated fairly. Specifically, orthopaedic surgeons can help ensure appropriate risk adjustment of patients when this is being done. Undoubtedly, PROMs will only become a larger part of musculoskeletal care moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David N Bernstein
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Bernstein), the Harvard Combined Orthopaedic Residency Program, Boston, MA (Bernstein), and the Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (Baumhauer)
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sakaguchi T, Meena U, Tanaka M, Xiang H, Fujiwara Y, Arataki S, Taoka T, Takamatsu K, Yasuda Y, Nakagawa M, Utsunomiya K. Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Gait and Balance Ability in Patients Who Underwent Corrective Long Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6500. [PMID: 37892638 PMCID: PMC10607759 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12206500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective observational study. BACKGROUND The risk of a femoral neck fracture due to a fall after adult spinal deformity surgery has been reported. One of the most significant factors among walking and balance tests in post-operative ASD patients was the timed up-and-go test (TUG). This study aims to calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in balance tests after ASD surgery. METHODS Forty-eight patients, 4 males and 44 females, were included by exclusion criteria in 66 consecutive patients who underwent corrective surgery as a treatment for ASD at our institution from June 2017 to February 2022. The inclusion criteria for this study were age ≥50 years; and no history of high-energy trauma. The exclusion criteria were dementia, severe deformity of the lower extremities, severe knee or hip osteoarthritis, history of central nervous system disorders, cancer, and motor severe paralysis leading to gait disorders. The surgeries were performed in two stages, first, the oblique lumber interbody fusion (OLIF) L1 to L5 (or S1), and second, the posterior corrective fusion basically from T10 to pelvis. For outcome assessment, 10 m walk velocity, TUG, ODI, and spinopelvic parameters were used. RESULTS Ten meter walk velocity of pre-operation and post-operation were 1.0 ± 0.3 m/s and 1.2 ± 0.2 m/s, respectively (p < 0.01). The TUG of pre-operation and post-operation were 12.1 ± 3.7 s and 9.7 ± 2.2 s, respectively (p < 0.01). The ODI improved from 38.6 ± 12.8% to 24.2 ± 15.9% after surgery (p < 0.01). All post-operative parameters except PI obtained statistically significant improvement after surgery. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of MCID of the 10 m walk velocity and TUG after ASD surgery. Ten meter walk velocity and the TUG improved after surgery; their improvement values were correlated with the ODI. MCID using the anchor-based approach for 10 m walk velocity and the TUG were 0.10 m/s and 2.0 s, respectively. These MCID values may be useful for rehabilitation after ASD surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyoshi Sakaguchi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (T.S.); (K.T.); (Y.Y.); (M.N.); (K.U.)
| | - Umesh Meena
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (U.M.); (H.X.); (Y.F.); (S.A.); (T.T.)
| | - Masato Tanaka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (U.M.); (H.X.); (Y.F.); (S.A.); (T.T.)
| | - Hongfei Xiang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (U.M.); (H.X.); (Y.F.); (S.A.); (T.T.)
| | - Yoshihiro Fujiwara
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (U.M.); (H.X.); (Y.F.); (S.A.); (T.T.)
| | - Shinya Arataki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (U.M.); (H.X.); (Y.F.); (S.A.); (T.T.)
| | - Takuya Taoka
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (U.M.); (H.X.); (Y.F.); (S.A.); (T.T.)
| | - Kazuhiko Takamatsu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (T.S.); (K.T.); (Y.Y.); (M.N.); (K.U.)
| | - Yosuke Yasuda
- Department of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (T.S.); (K.T.); (Y.Y.); (M.N.); (K.U.)
| | - Masami Nakagawa
- Department of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (T.S.); (K.T.); (Y.Y.); (M.N.); (K.U.)
| | - Kayo Utsunomiya
- Department of Rehabilitation, Okayama Rosai Hospital, 1-10-25 Chikkomidorimachi, Minami Ward Okayama, Okayama 702-8055, Japan; (T.S.); (K.T.); (Y.Y.); (M.N.); (K.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shaikh HJF, Anderson DE, Chait AR, Ramirez G, Bronstein RD, Goldblatt JP, Giordano BD, Maloney MD, Nicandri GT, Voloshin I, Mannava S. Use of Area Deprivation Index to Predict Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Am J Sports Med 2023; 51:2815-2823. [PMID: 37551708 DOI: 10.1177/03635465231187904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socioeconomic disparities correlate with worse outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, use of a surrogate to describe socioeconomic disadvantage has been a challenge. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) is a tool that encompasses 17 socioeconomic variables into a single metric based on census location. HYPOTHESIS Higher ADI would result in a worse minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and have less improvement in range of motion (ROM) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). STUDY DESIGN Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHOD A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged quartile (ADIHigh) were compared with the least disadvantaged quartile (ADILow) in the ability to reach MCID. Demographic and surgical features were assessed for attainment of MCID. RESULTS In total 1382 patients were identified who underwent ARCR, of which a total of 306 patients met final inclusion criteria. A higher percentage of patients within the ADIHigh cohort identified as "Black" or "other" race and had government-issued insurance compared with the ADILow cohort (P < .05). The ADIHigh cohort had significantly worse postoperative forward flexion compared with the ADILow cohort (145.0°± 32.5° vs 156.3°± 23.4°; P = .001) despite starting with comparable preoperative ROM (P = .17). Logistic regression showed that ADI was the only variable significant for predicting achievement of MCID for all 3 PROMIS domains, with the ADIHigh cohort having significantly worse odds of achieving MCID Physical Function (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; P = .001), Pain Interference (OR, 0.21; P = .001), and Depression (OR, 0.28; P = .001). Meanwhile, age, sex, body mass index, and smoking history were nonsignificant. Moreover, "other" for race and Medicare insurance were significant for achievement of MCID Depression but not Physical Function or Pain Interference. Finally, ADI was the main feature for predictive logistic regression modeling. CONCLUSION ADI served as the only significant predictor for achieving MCID for all 3 PROMIS domains after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patients who face high levels of socioeconomic disadvantage have lower rates of achieving MCID. In addition, patients with greater neighborhood disadvantage demonstrated significantly worse improvement in active forward flexion. Further investigation is required to understand the role of ADI on physical therapy compliance and to identify the barriers that prevent equitable postoperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hashim J F Shaikh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Devon E Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Alexander R Chait
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Gabriel Ramirez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Robert D Bronstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - John P Goldblatt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Brian D Giordano
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Michael D Maloney
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Gregg T Nicandri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Ilya Voloshin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Sandeep Mannava
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Physical Performance, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Turcotte JJ, Baxter S, Pipkin K, Patton CM. Are We Considering the Whole Patient? The Impact of Physical and Mental Health on the Outcomes of Spine Care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:720-727. [PMID: 36856543 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective, observational. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of baseline health status on the physical and mental health (MH) outcomes of spine patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Spine conditions can have a significant burden on both the physical and MH of patients. To date, few studies have evaluated the outcomes of both dimensions of health, particularly in nonoperative populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS At their first visit to a multidisciplinary spine clinic, 2668 nonoperative patients completed the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) instrument and a questionnaire evaluating symptoms and goals of care. Patients were stratified by their baseline percentile score of the MH and physical health (PH) components of the PROMIS-GH. Four groups of patients were compared based on the presence or absence of bottom quartile PH or MH scores. The primary end point was the achievement of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the MH or PH components at follow-up. Multivariate regression assessed the predictors of MCID achievement. RESULTS After controlling for demographics, symptoms, and goals, each 1-point increase in baseline PROMIS-GH mental score reduced the odds of achieving MH MCID by 9.0% ( P <0.001). Conversely, each 1-point increase in baseline GH-physical score increased the odds of achieving MCID by 4.5% ( P =0.005). Each 1-point increase in baseline GH-physical score reduced the odds of achieving PH MCID by 12.5% ( P <0.001), whereas each 1-point increase in baseline GH-mental score increased the odds of achieving MCID by 5.0% ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Spine patients presenting with the lowest levels of physical or MH were most likely to experience clinically significant improvement in those domains. However, lower levels of physical or mental health made it less likely that patients would experience significant improvement in the alternative domain. Physicians should evaluate and address the complex spine population holistically to maximize improvement in both physical and mental health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin J Turcotte
- Department of Orthopedics, Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Assessing Clinical Outcome Measures in Chiari I Malformation. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:167-174. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2022.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|