Surgical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Corpectomy with Percutaneous Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Collapse with Neurologic Deficits in the Thoracolumbar Spine Compared with Those After Posterior Spinal Fusion with Vertebroplasty

Indirect Decompression in Vertebral Reconstruction for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures with Neurological Symptoms: A Preliminary Case Series

Introduction

This study aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcome of "indirect decompression" using lateral-posterior combined surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) with neurological symptoms.

Methods

A total of 17 patients who underwent lateral and posterior combined indirect decompressive spinal reconstruction (LP-IDR) for single-level OVF with neurological symptoms were included in this study. The neurological symptoms (sensory disturbance and muscle weakness) and imaging findings (local angle and height of the fracture segment and bone fragment occupancy in the spinal canal) were investigated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the 1-year follow-up.

Results

Muscle weakness was observed preoperatively in ten patients. Nine patients had complete recovery of muscle weakness (p<0.001), whereas one had residual muscle weakness at the 1-year follow-up. The presence of sensory disturbance was observed in 16 patients preoperatively, and it was significantly reduced to 8 patients at the 1-year follow-up (p=0.003). The bony fragment occupancy rate in the spinal canal was decreased from 44.0% to 40.2% postoperatively (p=0.04) and to 33.1% at 1 year (p=0.002). The local angle was corrected from 8.3° to -2.6° postoperatively (p=0.003) and to 1.2° at 1 year. The local height was corrected from 26.7 to 32.0 mm postoperatively (p<0.001) and to 29.8 mm at 1 year.

Conclusions

LP-IDR for OVF with neurological symptoms provided sufficient neurological improvement with expansion of the spinal canal over time.

Unchanged incidence of major adverse events amidst rising surgical interventions for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, 2015-2021

This study investigated treatment trends and major adverse events in patients hospitalized for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). The frequency of surgical interventions for OVF increased significantly, but this did not decrease major adverse events. The findings underscore the necessity for reevaluating OVF management strategies.

PURPOSE

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is a common condition in the aging population, often leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Here, we analyzed treatment trends and incidence of major adverse events in patients hospitalized for OVF.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study, using a large Japanese hospital administrative database. The cohort included hospitalized patients aged 65 years or older, admitted for OVF from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcomes were the trend in the proportion of the patients undergoing surgery for OVF and the incidence of major adverse events within 30 days of admission. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the trend in hospitalization costs.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 14,714 patients, with a mean age of 82.4 years. There was a significant increase in surgical interventions for OVF, from 3.7% of patients in 2015 to 9.8% in 2021 (p < 0.001). The incidence of major adverse events remained unchanged, with a risk ratio of 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.35) in 2021 compared to 2015. Average hospitalization costs increased significantly, from $7,570.6 (SD 6,047.0) in 2015 to $9,502.9 (SD 7,231.5) in 2021 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite a significant increase in the proportion of surgical intervention for OVF, no reduction in the risk of major adverse events was observed between 2015 and 2021. Surgeons and policy makers need to interpret these findings and work towards an optimized approach to the management of OVF in the aging population.

Advancing Prone-Transpsoas Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review and Evolution of Indications with Representative Cases

The Prone Transpsoas (PTP) approach to lumbar spine surgery, emerging as an evolution of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), offers significant advantages over traditional methods. PTP has demonstrated increased lumbar lordosis gains compared to LLIF, owing to the natural increase in lordosis afforded by prone positioning. Additionally, the prone position offers anatomical advantages, with shifts in the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus, reducing the likelihood of postoperative femoral plexopathy and moving critical peritoneal contents away from the approach. Furthermore, operative efficiency is a notable benefit of PTP. By eliminating the need for intraoperative position changes, PTP reduces surgical time, which in turn decreases the risk of complications and operative costs. Finally, its versatility extends to various lumbar pathologies, including degeneration, adjacent segment disease, and deformities. The growing body of evidence indicates that PTP is at least as safe as traditional approaches, with a potentially better complication profile. In this narrative review, we review the historical evolution of lateral interbody fusion, culminating in the prone transpsoas approach. We also describe several adjuncts of PTP, including robotics and radiation-reduction methods. Finally, we illustrate the versatility of PTP and its uses, ranging from 'simple' degenerative cases to complex deformity surgeries.