Selective Thoracic Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques with Minimum 5-year Follow-up

Hybrid vs all pedicle screws constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a metaanalysis of clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects around 1 to 3% of young individuals, leading to spinal deformities typically exceeding a Cobb angle of 10 degrees without congenital or neuromuscular causes. Advances in treatment now include various surgical techniques such as posterior fusion utilizing all-pedicle screw constructs or hybrid constructs.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until February 2024. Comparative studies in which the cohort was separated into two groups (HC and PSC) were included. Data consisting of, surgery-related outcomes, sagittal radiographic outcomes, coronal radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes, was extracted and compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies including 3435 patients were included. Higher rates of complications (Odds-Ratio = 1.99, p < 0.00001) and reoperations (Odds-Ratio = 2.82, p < 0.00001) were seen in the hybrid group. Better radiographic coronal correction was seen in the PSC group in both the major curve (Mean Difference = 5.97, p < 0.00001) and the secondary curve (Mean Difference = - 10.73, p < 0.0001). However, restoration of sagittal alignment was better in the HC group when assessing thoracic kyphosis (Mean Difference = 2.97, p = 0.02) and lumbar lordosis (Mean Difference = 3.17, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

While all-pedicle screw constructs demonstrated greater stability in AIS compared to hybrid constructs, resulting in reduced rates of reoperations and complications, as well as improved correction of major and secondary curves, they were unable to fully restore optimal sagittal alignment.

Concave rod first vs. convex rod first in AIS instrumentation with differential rod contouring: computer modeling and simulations based on ten AIS surgical cases

PURPOSE

To assess biomechanical differences between AIS instrumentations using concave vs. convex rod first.

METHODS

Instrumentations of ten AIS patients were simulated first with major correction maneuvers using the concave rod then with convex rod. Correction maneuvers were concave/convex rod translation, followed by apical vertebral derotation and then convex/concave rod translation. The concave/convex rods were 5.5/5.5 and 6.0/5.5 mm diameter Co-Cr and contoured to 35°/15°, 55°/15°, 75°/15° and 85°/15°, respectively.

RESULTS

Differences in simulated thoracic Cobb angle (MT), thoracic kyphosis (TK) and apical vertebral rotation (AVR) were less than 5° between the two techniques; mean bone-screw force difference was less then 15N (p > 0.1). Increasing differential contouring angle from 35°/15° to 85°/15°, the MT changed from 14 ± 7° to 15 ± 8°, AVR from 12 ± 4° to 6 ± 5°, TK from 23 ± 4° to 42 ± 4°, and bone-screw forces from 159 ± 88N to 329 ± 170N (P < 0.05). Increasing the concave rod diameter from 5.5 to 6 mm, the mean MT correction improvement for both techniques was less than 2°, the AVR correction was improved by 2°, the TK increased by 4° and bone-screw force increased by about 25N (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in deformity corrections and bone-screw forces between the two techniques. Increasing differential contouring angle and rod diameter improved AVR and TK corrections with no significant effect on the MT Cobb angle. Although this study simplified the complexity of a generic surgical technique, the main effects of a limited number of identical steps were replicated for each case in a systematic manner to analyze the main first-order effects.

Do hypokyphotic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Ponte osteotomy obtain a better clinical efficacy? A preliminary retrospective study

Study design

A retrospective case–control study.

Objective

To evaluate whether Ponte osteotomy improves thoracic kyphosis and to determine its clinical efficacy in hypokyphotic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

Eighty consecutive Lenke type 1 AIS patients with hypokyphotic curves who underwent posterior spinal fusion by one spine surgeon at a single institution were recruited. According to whether Ponte osteotomy was performed, the patients were divided into two groups. The preoperative, immediate, one-year postoperative, and two-year postoperative radiographs were analyzed. The demographic characteristics, surgical information, radiographic parameters, Scoliosis Research Societye-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire, and complications were compared.

Results

The sagittal alignment and coronal alignment were both improved in the Ponte group and the control group postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the preoperative parameters between the two groups, except the TL/L, CB, and LL. Significant differences were found in the MT (15.18° ± 2.84° vs. 20.33° ± 3.75°, P < 0.001) and TK (24.23° ± 2.71° vs. 19.93° ± 2.38°, P < 0.001) at the two-year follow-up. The Ponte group had a longer operation time and more intraoperative blood loss. No significant difference was observed between the groups in the SRS-22 scores at the final follow-up.

Conclusions

Ponte osteotomy could obtain better coronal correction and sagittal contour restoration in AIS patients with hypokyphosis. However, Ponte osteotomies might lead to more intraoperative blood loss and longer operation time. Moreover, no discrepancy was found in the postoperative health-related quality of life of the included patients. Therefore, we considered that the Ponte osteotomy may be an alternative method to restore the desired thoracic kyphosis, which needs further study.