Alarm criteria for motor-evoked potentials: what's wrong with the "presence-or-absence" approach?

Which patients do we need to consider augmentation of muscle active potentials regarding transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials monitoring before spine surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) are the current trend and are important in preventing intraoperative neurological deficits. Posttetanic Tc-MEPs (p-MEP) can augment the amplitudes of compound muscle active potentials (CMAPs), especially in the case of insufficient conventional Tc-MEPs (c-MEP).

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate pre- and intraoperative factors necessitating p-MEP monitoring and to examine changes in the success rates of baseline Tc-MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation in patients with such factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients (n=184) who underwent spinal surgery with Tc-MEP monitoring in our department between August 2020 and July 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Manual muscle testing (MMT) scores were calculated to identify patients with preoperative motor deficits. c-MEP and p-MEP amplitudes were recorded from the defined muscles.

METHODS

We compared preoperative and intraoperative factors between the c-MEP and p-MEP groups (study 1). In cases where the factors were identified, we investigated the success rate of the baseline MEP measurement of each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation (study 2).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-seven patients were included. Of those, 87 showed sufficient CMAPs with c-MEP. Meanwhile, 70 needed p-MEP because of insufficient CMAPs. In univariate analysis, cervical/thoracic surgery (p<.001), preoperative MMT 3 or below (p=.009), shorter duration of illness (p=.037), previous cerebrovascular disease (p=.014), and dialysis (p=.031) were significantly associated with p-MEP group. Preoperative MMT 3 or below was the only factor requiring p-MEP (odds ratio, 3.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-8.73, p=.014) in multivariate analysis. In the p-MEP group, 24 patients had preoperative motor deficits; 16 patients with complete data were included in the analysis (study 2). The success rates of MEP monitoring before and after tetanic stimulation of the entire lower-extremity muscles were 42.7 and 57.3%, respectively (p<.001). The success rates for each muscle before and after tetanic stimulation were abductor pollicis brevis: 81.3% and 96.9%, tibialis anterior: 34.4% and 50.0%, gastrocnemius: 25% and 40.6%, and abductor hallucis: 68.8% and 81.3%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in success rates for any of the muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with preoperative MMT 3 or below highly needed p-MEP. The success rate of baseline MEP monitoring increased with tetanic stimulation, even in patients with preoperative motor deficits. We believe that p-MEP monitoring can result in reliable CMAP recording, especially in cases of preoperative motor deficits with MMT scores of 3 or below.

Facial nerve electrical motor evoked potential in cerebellopontine angle tumors for its anatomical and functional preservation

Background

Among the technical measures to preserve facial nerve (FN) function, intraoperative neuromonitoring has become mandatory and is constantly being scrutinized. Hence, to determine the efficacy of FN motor evoked potentials (FNMEPs) in predicting long-term motor FN function following cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor surgery, an analysis of cases was done.

Methods

In 37 patients who underwent CPA surgery, FNMEPs through corkscrew electrodes positioned at C5-C6 and C6-C5 (C is the central line of the brain as per 10-20 EEG electrode placement) were used to deliver short train stimuli and recorded from the orbicularis oculi, oris, and mentalis muscles.

Results

In 58 patients, triggered electromyography (EMG) was able to identify the FN during resection of tumor, but 8 out of these (4.64%) patients developed new facial weakness, whereas 3 out of 38 (1.11%) patients who had intact FN function MEP (decrement of FN target muscles - CMAPs amplitude peak to peak >50-60%), developed new facial weakness (House and Brackmann grade II to III).

Conclusion

The FNMEP has significant superiority over triggered EMG when tumor is giant and envelops the FN.

Accuracy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in the Diagnosis of Intraoperative Neurological Decline in the Setting of Spinal Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to prevent intraoperative neurological injury during spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has increased significantly in recent years. Using IONM, spinal cord function can be evaluated intraoperatively by recording signals from specific nerve roots, motor tracts, and sensory tracts. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to evaluate the efficacy of IONM among patients undergoing spine surgery for any indication.

METHODS

The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS for all studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyography (EMG), either on their own or in combination (multimodal). Studies were included if they reported raw numbers for True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN), False Positives (FP) and True Negative (TN) either in a 2 × 2 contingency table or in text, and if they used postoperative neurologic exam as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the overall efficacy of each modality type using a bivariate model adapted by Reitsma et al, for all spine surgeries and for individual disease groups and regions of spine. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

A total of 163 studies were included; 52 of these studies with 16,310 patients reported data for SSEP, 68 studies with 71,144 patients reported data for MEP, 16 studies with 7888 patients reported data for EMG and 69 studies with 17,968 patients reported data for multimodal monitoring. The overall sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC for SSEP were 71.4% (95% CI 54.8-83.7), 97.1% (95% CI 95.3-98.3), 41.9 (95% CI 24.1-73.1) and .899, respectively; for MEP, these were 90.2% (95% CI 86.2-93.1), 96% (95% CI 94.3-97.2), 103.25 (95% CI 69.98-152.34) and .927; for EMG, these were 48.3% (95% CI 31.4-65.6), 92.9% (95% CI 84.4-96.9), 11.2 (95% CI 4.84-25.97) and .773; for multimodal, these were found to be 83.5% (95% CI 81-85.7), 93.8% (95% CI 90.6-95.9), 60 (95% CI 35.6-101.3) and .895, respectively. Using the QUADAS-2 ROB analysis, of the 52 studies reporting on SSEP, 13 (25%) were high-risk, 10 (19.2%) had some concerns and 29 (55.8%) were low-risk; for MEP, 8 (11.7%) were high-risk, 21 had some concerns and 39 (57.3%) were low-risk; for EMG, 4 (25%) were high-risk, 3 (18.75%) had some concerns and 9 (56.25%) were low-risk; for multimodal, 14 (20.3%) were high-risk, 13 (18.8%) had some concerns and 42 (60.7%) were low-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that all neuromonitoring modalities have diagnostic utility in successfully detecting impending or incident intraoperative neurologic injuries among patients undergoing spine surgery for any condition, although it is clear that the accuracy of each modality differs.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023384158.

Clinical utility of intraoperative direct wave monitoring in patients with pre-operative motor deficits: Case series

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

D-wave (Direct waves) are Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) generated by a single transcranial stimulation and captured by attaching an epidural recording electrode caudal to the vulnerable area. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is widely used in neurosurgery to recognize important neurological structures but can be challenging in the pediatric population due to incomplete neural development.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1: A 48-year-old female presented to the outpatient department with complaints of difficulty walking for the past six months, numbness and weakness in bilateral lower limbs with recurrent falls for the past 1 month. Case 2: A 12-year-old boy presented to the emergency room with a history of inability to use both upper and lower limbs on the right side with tremulousness.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Spine in the first case revealed a D9-D10 calcified meningioma with significant spinal cord compression. In the second case, MRI Spine showed C1-C2 Intramedullary Space Occupying Lesion (SOL) and was planned for C1-C2 laminectomy with midline myelotomy. The first case was planned for microsurgical excision of the lesion under IONM guidance. The procedure went smoothly. Microsurgical gross total resection (GTR) of the intramedullary SOL under IONM Guidance was done for the second case. Postoperatively, the first patient showed no neurological compromise or complications. In the second case, following surgery, the child recovered gradually from surgery.

CONCLUSION

This case series demonstrates the successful surgical management of two cases of spinal cord tumors through an IONM-guided surgery and the effective use of D waves in such challenging cases.

The role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery

Intramedullary tumors are a class of central nervous system tumors with an incidence of 2 to 4%. As they are located very deep and frequently cause postoperative neurological complications, surgical resection is difficult. In recent years, many surgeons have performed electrophysiological monitoring to effectively reduce the occurrence of postoperative neurological complications. Modern electrophysiological monitoring technology has advanced considerably, leading to the development of many monitoring methods, such as SSEPs, MEPs, DCM, and EMG, to monitor intramedullary tumors. However, electrophysiological monitoring in tumor resection is still being studied. In this article, we discussed the different monitoring methods and their role in monitoring intramedullary tumors by reviewing previous studies. Intratumorally tumors need to be monitored for a summary of the condition of the patient. Only by using various monitoring methods flexibly and through clear communication between surgeons and neurophysiological experts can good decisions be made during surgery and positive surgical results be achieved.

Utility of Dual Monitoring of the Lower Cranial Nerve Motor-Evoked Potentials Threshold Level Criterion to Predict Swallowing Function in Skull Base and Brainstem Surgery

PURPOSE

Evaluate the value of bilateral final/baseline threshold level changes of lower cranial nerve MEPs in postoperative swallowing function deterioration prediction.

METHODS

Bilateral lower cranial nerve motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded in 51 patients who underwent treatment for skull base and brainstem tumors. Corkscrew-like electrodes were positione 2 cm below C3/C4 and Cz. The MEPs were recorded from different muscle groups, including the posterior pharyngeal wall muscle, tongue muscle, genioglossus muscle, and cricothyroid muscle through paired needle electrodes. Swallowing function was assessed clinically using the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability score before and after the procedure at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months.

RESULTS

Bilateral final/baseline threshold level increases in lower cranial nerve MEPs under the dual monitoring were significantly correlated with postoperative swallowing function deterioration ( r = 0.660 at 7 days, r = 0.735 at 1 month, and r = 0.717 at 3 months; p < 0.05). Bilateral final/baseline threshold level changes of more than 20% were recorded in 23 of the 51 patients, with 21 patients experiencing swallowing function deterioration postoperatively. The other 28 patients had bilateral threshold level changes of less than 20%, with 26 patients maintaining or improving their swallowing function, and 12 of those patients presented transient deterioration of swallowing function in the early postoperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual monitoring of lower cranial nerves and their different muscle groups MEPs was a safe and effective way to predict postoperative swallowing function. An increase in bilateral final/baseline threshold level change of more than 20% was predictive of permanent swallowing deterioration, especially in patients with poor swallowing function preoperatively.

The Utility of Transcranial Stimulated Motor-Evoked Potential Alerts in Cervical Spine Surgery Varies Based on Preoperative Motor Status

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in cervical spine surgery and identify factors associated with positive predictive value when Tc-MEP alerts are occurred.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The sensitivity and specificity of Tc-MEP for detecting motor paralysis are high; however, false-positives sometimes occur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors examined Tc-MEP in 2476 cases of cervical spine surgeries and compared patient backgrounds, type of spinal disorders, preoperative motor status, surgical factors, and the types of Tc-MEP alerts. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% from the control waveform. Tc-MEP results were classified into two groups: false-positive and true-positive, and items that showed significant differences were extracted by univariate analysis and detected by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity was 66% (segmental paralysis: 33% and lower limb paralysis: 95.8%) and specificity was 91.5%. Tc-MEP outcomes were 33 true-positives and 233 false-positives. Positive predictive value of general spine surgery was significantly higher in cases with a severe motor status than in a nonsevere motor status (19.5% vs . 6.7%, P =0.02), but not different in high-risk spine surgery (20.8% vs . 19.4%). However, rescue rates did not significantly differ regardless of motor status (48% vs . 50%). In a multivariate logistic analysis, a preoperative severe motor status [ P =0.041, odds ratio (OR): 2.46, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.03-5.86] and Tc-MEP alerts during intradural tumor resection ( P <0.001, OR: 7.44, 95% CI: 2.64-20.96) associated with true-positives, while Tc-MEP alerts that could not be identified with surgical maneuvers ( P =0.011, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.073-0.71) were associated with false-positives.

CONCLUSION

The utility of Tc-MEP in patients with a preoperative severe motor status was enhanced, even in those without high-risk spine surgery. Regardless of the motor status, appropriate interventions following Tc-MEP alerts may prevent postoperative paralysis.

Bilateral and Optimistic Warning Paradigms Improve the Predictive Power of Intraoperative Facial Motor Evoked Potentials during Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery

Simple Summary

During surgery for vestibular schwannomas, the facial nerve is monitored via motor evoked potentials (facial nerve MEP). The established warning criteria for facial nerve MEP signal changes mostly refer to the ipsilateral side and disregard the contralateral side. Furthermore, the surgeon is warned as soon as the signal of a single facial muscle deteriorates. We examined how the predictive power of the facial nerve MEP would change if we used the percent change in ipsilateral versus contralateral MEP stimulation intensity over time as warning criterion; additionally, if we warned in a novel optimistic manner, a manner in which the surgeon would be warned only if all derived facial muscles deteriorate significantly, as opposed to the traditional method, in which the surgeon is warned as soon as a single muscle deteriorates. We retrospectively compared this approach to actual intraoperative warnings (based on unilateral threshold change, A-trains, and MEP loss) and show that with our method, the facial nerve MEP was significantly more specific and triggered fewer unnecessary warnings.

Abstract

Facial muscle corticobulbar motor evoked potentials (FMcoMEPs) are used to monitor facial nerve integrity during vestibular schwannoma resections to increase maximal safe tumor resection. Established warning criteria, based on ipsilateral amplitude reduction, have the limitation that the rate of false positive alarms is high, in part because FMcoMEP changes occur on both sides, e.g., due to brain shift or pneumocephalus. We retrospectively compared the predictive value of ipsilateral-only warning criteria and actual intraoperative warnings with a novel candidate warning criterion, based on “ipsilateral versus contralateral difference in relative stimulation threshold increase, from baseline to end of resection” (BilatMT ≥ 20%), combined with an optimistic approach in which a warning would be triggered only if all facial muscles on the affected side deteriorated. We included 60 patients who underwent resection of vestibular schwannoma. The outcome variable was postoperative facial muscle function. Retrospectively applying BilatMT, with the optimistic approach, was found to have a significantly better false positive rate, which was much lower (9% at day 90) than the traditionally used ipsilateral warning criteria (>20%) and was also lower than actual intraoperative warnings. This is the first report combining the threshold method with an optimistic approach in a bilateral multi-facial muscle setup. This method could substantially reduce the rate of false positive alarms in FMcoMEP monitoring.

Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review

During intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP), heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, intraoperative settings, applied warning criteria, and outcome reporting exists. A scoping review of MEP warning criteria in supratentorial surgery was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Sixty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most commonly used alarm criteria were MEP signal loss, which was always a major warning sign, followed by amplitude reduction and threshold elevation. Irreversible MEP alterations were associated with a higher number of transient and persisting motor deficits compared with the reversible changes. In almost all studies, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were high, while in most of them, sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) were rather low or modest. Thus, the absence of an irreversible alteration may reassure the neurosurgeon that the patient will not suffer a motor deficit in the short-term and long-term follow-up. Further, MEPs perform well as surrogate markers, and reversible MEP deteriorations after successful intervention indicate motor function preservation postoperatively. However, in future studies, a consensus regarding the definitions of MEP alteration, critical duration of alterations, and outcome reporting should be determined.

Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve augments motor evoked potentials by re-exciting spinal anterior horn cells

Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve, immediately prior to conducting transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential (TES-MEP), increases MEP amplitudes in both innervated and uninnervated muscles by the stimulated peripheral nerve; this is known as the remote augmentation of MEPs. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying the remote augmentation of MEPs remain unclear. Although one hypothesis was that remote augmentation of MEPs results from increased motoneuronal excitability at the spinal cord level, the effect of spinal anterior horn cells has not yet been investigated. We aimed to investigate the effect of tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve on spinal cord anterior horn cells by analyzing the F-wave. We included 34 patients who underwent elective spinal surgeries and compared the changes in F-waves and TES-MEPs pre- and post-tetanic stimulation of the median nerve. F-wave analyses were recorded by stimulating the median and tibial nerves. TES-MEPs and F-wave analyses were compared between baseline and post-tetanic stimulation time periods using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. A significant augmentation of MEPs, independent of the level corresponding to the median nerve, was demonstrated. Furthermore, F-wave persistence was significantly increased not only in the median nerve but also in the tibial nerve after tetanic stimulation of the median nerve. The increased F-wave persistence indicates an increase of re-excited motor units in spinal anterior horn cells. These results confirm the hypothesis that tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve may cause remote augmentation of MEPs, primarily by increasing the excitability of the anterior horn cells.

Intraoperative Lumbar Muscle Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring With Transcortical Stimulation

BACKGROUND

Stimulating electrodes for lower extremity motor-evoked potential (LE-MEP) monitoring with transcortical stimulation are usually placed on the medial side of motor cortex convexity, which is not lower extremity but lumbar motor area. Lumbar MEP may be elicited with lower stimulation intensity than LE-MEP through this location, and it is useful to monitor lower extremity motor function intraoperatively.

METHODS

Intraoperative lumbar and LE-MEP monitoring with transcortical stimulation during surgery of 12 patients with lesions involving the motor cortex from January 2012 to February 2019 at Shinshu University Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. Stimulations were delivered by a train of 5 pulses of anodal constant current stimulation. Stimulating electrode position was determined by motor cortex mapping. Recording needle electrodes were placed on bilateral lumbar muscles and contralateral leg muscles. The threshold-level stimulation method was used for MEP monitoring. The thresholds, monitoring result, and postoperative motor function of lumbar and lower extremities were compared.

RESULTS

The mean baseline thresholds were 19.9 ± 8.9 mA for lumbar MEP and 26.5 ± 11.5 mA for LE-MEP (P = 0.02). Patterns of intraoperative monitoring changes were the same between lumbar and LE-MEP monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar MEP was stimulated with lower stimulation intensity than the LE-MEP with the same intraoperative pattern of waveform changes in 12 patients. Lumbar MEP monitoring may be useful for preserving the corticospinal tract of lower extremities intraoperatively.

Intraoperative facial motor evoked potential monitoring for pontine cavernous malformation resection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to predict postoperative facial nerve function during pontine cavernous malformation surgery by monitoring facial motor evoked potentials (FMEPs).

METHODS

From 2008 to 2017, 10 patients with pontine cavernous malformations underwent total resection via the trans-fourth ventricle floor approach with FMEP monitoring. House-Brackmann grades and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores were obtained pre- and postoperatively. The surgeries were performed using one of 2 safe entry zones into the brainstem: the suprafacial triangle and infrafacial triangle approaches. Six patients underwent the suprafacial triangle approach, and 4 patients underwent the infrafacial triangle approach. A cranial peg screw electrode was used to deliver electrical stimulation for FMEP by a train of 4 or 5 pulse anodal constant current stimulation. FMEP was recorded from needle electrodes on the ipsilateral facial muscles and monitored throughout surgery by using a threshold-level stimulation method.

RESULTS

FMEPs were recorded and analyzed in 8 patients; they were not recorded in 2 patients who had severe preoperative facial palsy and underwent an infrafacial triangle approach. Warning signs appeared in all patients who underwent the suprafacial triangle approach. However, after temporarily stopping the procedures, FMEP findings during surgery showed recovery of the thresholds. FMEPs in patients who underwent the infrafacial triangle approach were stable during the surgery. House-Brackmann grades were unchanged postoperatively in all patients. Postoperative KPS scores improved in 3 patients, decreased in 1, and remained the same in 6 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

FMEPs can be used to monitor facial nerve function during surgery for pontine cavernous malformations, especially when the suprafacial triangle approach is performed.

A comparison between threshold criterion and amplitude criterion in transcranial motor evoked potentials during surgery for supratentorial lesions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity and specificity between the novel threshold and amplitude criteria for motor evoked potentials (MEPs) monitoring after transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) during surgery for supratentorial lesions in the same patient cohort.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six patients were included. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Craniotomies did not expose motor cortex, so that direct mapping was less suitable. After TES, MEPs were recorded bilaterally from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), from orbicularis oris (OO), and/or from tibialis anterior (TA). The percentage increase in the threshold level was assessed and considered significant if it exceeded by more than 20% on the affected side the percentage increase on the unaffected side. Amplitude on the affected side was measured with a stimulus intensity of 150% of the threshold level set for each muscle.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 126 patients showed a significant change in the threshold level as well as an amplitude reduction of more than 50% in MEPs recorded from APB, and 15 of the patients had postoperative deterioration of motor function of the arm (temporary in 8 cases and permanent in 7 [true-positive and false-negative results]). Recording from TA was performed in 66 patients; 4 developed postoperative deterioration of motor function of the leg (temporary in 3 cases and permanent in 1), and showed a significant change in the threshold level, and an amplitude reduction of more than 50% occurred in 1 patient. An amplitude reduction of more than 50% occurred in another 10 patients, without a significant change in the threshold level or postoperative deterioration. Recording from OO was performed in 61 patients; 3 developed postoperative deterioration of motor function of facial muscles (temporary in 2 cases and permanent in 1) and had a significant change in the threshold level, and 2 of the patients had an amplitude reduction of more than 50%. Another 6 patients had an amplitude reduction of more than 50% but no significant change in the threshold level or postoperative deterioration.Sensitivity of the threshold criterion was 100% when MEPs were recorded from APB, OO, or TA, and its specificity was 97%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity of the amplitude criterion was 100%, 67%, and 25%, with a specificity of 97%, 90%, and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The threshold criterion was comparable to the amplitude criterion with a stimulus intensity set at 150% of the threshold level regarding sensitivity and specificity when recording MEPs from APB, and superior to it when recording from TA or OO.

Survivals of the Intraoperative Motor-evoked Potentials Response in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery: What Are the Neurologic Outcomes of Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cases study from a prospective patient register.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the clinical implication regard to the survivals of motor-evoked potential (MEP) response.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has become an essential component for decreasing the incidence of neurological deficits during spine surgeries. Significant motor-evoked potential (MEP) loss but does not vanish completely is common especially in some high-risk and complicated pediatric spine deformity surgeries.

METHODS

A total of 1820 young patients (mean age = 12.2 years) underwent spinal deformity correction were mainly analyzed. Intraoperative monitoring (somatosensory-evoked potential, MEP, free-run electromyography, free-run electromyography) and postoperative neurologic outcomes were mainly analyzed in this study. All patients with monitoring alerts were divided into two groups: group 1, intraoperative MEP recovery group; and group 2, no obvious MEP recovery group. Moreover, the patients would be followed up strictly if he/she showed IOM alerting. The surviving MEP response was identified as significant monitoring alerts (80%-95% MEP Amp. loss) associated with high-risk surgical maneuvers.

RESULTS

The results showed that there were 32 pediatric patients (group 1, 21 cases and group 2, 11 cases) presenting significant MEP monitoring alerts (80%-95% loss) relative to baseline. The patients in group 1 presented the partial/entire signal recovery from MEP alerts and they did not show spinal cord deficits postoperation. The patients in group 2 without obvious intraoperative MEP recovery showed different levels of new spinal deficits, no patient showed postoperative complete paraplegia or permanent spinal cord/nerve root deficits.

CONCLUSION

When the intraoperative MEP changes significant and persistent but without totally disappeared, the rate of postoperative neural complication is relatively low. The chance of recovery of these neurological deficits is very high. Therefore, this phenomenon may be used to predictive of nonpermanent paraplegia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Transcranial motor evoked potentials electrically elicited by multi-train stimulation can reflect isolated nerve root injury more precisely than those by conventional multi-pulse stimulation: an experimental study in rats

Nerve root injury can occur in complex spine surgeries. Recording transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) has been the most popular method to monitor motor function during surgery. However, TcMEPs cannot detect single nerve root injury satisfactorily. Recently, multi-train stimulation (MTS) was demonstrated to effectively enhance TcMEPs. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of TcMEPs elicited by MTS for intraoperative nerve root monitoring. TcMEPs were recorded from the quadriceps femoris (QF) and gastrocnemius (GC) muscles in the hindlimbs of 20 rats before and after transection of the nerve root at L6 (dominant root innervating the GC). For MTS, a multipulse (train) stimulus was delivered repeatedly at 5 Hz. The change ratio of the amplitude after transection of the nerve root was compared between MTS and conventional single-train stimulation (STS). The change in TcMEP amplitudes for QF after transection of the nerve root at L6 was 97.8 ± 12.2% with MTS and 100.1 ± 7.2% with STS (p = 0.496), whereas that for GC was 40.6 ± 11.5% with MTS and 64.8 ± 8.8% with STS (p < 0.001). MTS could improve the ability to detect isolated nerve root injury in intraoperative TcMEP monitoring.

Prognostic value of transcranial facial nerve motor-evoked potentials in predicting facial nerve function following cerebellopontine angle tumorectomy

Facial nerve paralysis is a common complication following cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgery. This study investigated the prognostic value of facial nerve motor-evoked potentials (FNMEPs) elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation for facial nerve outcome after CPA tumorectomy.A total of 95 patients were enrolled in this study between January 2014 and January 2016. All these patients underwent CPA tumorectomy (unilateral, n = 95; bilateral, n = 1). Intraoperative FNMEP elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation was recorded. The short- and long-term postoperative facial nerve functions were evaluated according to the House-Brackmann (HB) scale. The correlation between perioperative changes in the FNMEP stimulus threshold (delta FNMEP = postoperative stimulus threshold level-preoperative stimulus threshold level) and postoperative facial nerve functions were analyzed.On the first day postoperatively, the facial nerve function was HB grade I in 67, grade II in 17, grade III in 7, and grade IV in 5 facial nerves. One year postoperatively, the facial nerve function was grade I in 80, grade II in 11, grade III in 3, and grade IV in 2 facial nerves. The delta FNMEP was significantly correlated with the short- and long-term facial nerve function; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves yielded a cut-off delta FNMEP value of 30 V (sensitivity, 91.3%; specificity, 98.6%) and 75 V (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 98.8%) for predicting short- and long-term facial nerve function damage, respectively.FNMEP elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation is an effective and safe approach for predicting facial nerve function in CPA tumorectomy. A high delta FNMEP is a potential indicator for the prediction of postoperative facial nerve damage.

Systematic re-evaluation of intraoperative motor-evoked potential suppression in scoliosis surgery

Background

Motor- (MEP) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) are susceptible to the effects of intraoperative environmental factors.

Methods

Over a 5-year period, 250 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent corrective surgery with IOM were retrospectively analyzed for MEP suppression (MEPS).

Results

Our results show that four distinct groups of MEPS were encountered over the study period. All 12 patients did not sustain any neurological deficits postoperatively. However, comparison of groups 1 and 2 suggests that neither the duration of anesthesia nor speed of surgical or anesthetic intervention were associated with recovery to a level beyond the criteria for MEPS. For group 3, spontaneous MEPS recovery despite the lack of surgical intervention suggests that anesthetic intervention may play a role in this process. However, spontaneous MEPS recovery was also seen in group 4, suggesting that in certain circumstances, both surgical and anesthetic intervention was not required. In addition, neither the duration of time to the first surgical manoeuver nor the duration of surgical manoeuver to MEPS were related to recovery of MEPS. None of the patients had suppression of SSEPs intraoperatively.

Conclusion

This study suggests that in susceptible individuals, MEPS may rarely occur unpredictably, independent of surgical or anesthetic intervention. However, our findings favor anesthetic before surgical intervention as a proposed protocol. Early recognition of MEPS is important to prevent false positives in the course of IOM for spinal surgery.

Neurophysiological monitoring of displaced odontoid fracture reduction in a 3-year-old male

Introduction

Odontoid fractures in young children are rare. Most authors advocate for closed reduction and external stabilization as first line treatment. Unlike adults, young children are much less amenable to an awake reduction for real-time assessment of neurological function. We used spinal cord monitoring, as used in spine surgery, to assess the function of the spinal cord during the closed reduction in our 31-month-old patient.

Case presentation

A 31-month-old male presented with a displaced odontoid fracture and ASIA C spinal cord injury. Given his age, closed reduction and halo application were completed under general anesthesia guided by neuromonitoring. A less-than-ideal reduction initially was accepted due to a decline in motor-evoked potentials. Subsequently, there was no change in neurological status. The reduction was repeated under anesthesia, with monitoring, a number of times until good correction was achieved. Ultimately, a surgical fusion was required due to ligamentous instability. The child achieved a very good neurological outcome and a stable spine.

Discussion

Neuromonitoring is an important adjunct to closed reductions when complete and reliable neurological assessment is not possible.

Warning criteria for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraoperative changes in somatosensory (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) may indicate potential injury to the spinal cord and will require timely intervention to prevent permanent damage. This review focuses on the validity of currently recommended warning criteria for intraoperative evoked potential monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current guideline recommends a decrease in SEP amplitude by 50% and MEP amplitude by 50-100% as warning signals for injury to the ascending sensory and descending motor pathway, respectively. On the basis of cohort studies, the diagnostic accuracy of SEP and MEP to predict postoperative neurologic deficits was variable. Importantly, 0.1-4.1% of monitored patients suffered postoperative neurologic deficit despite apparently normal SEP and MEP recordings (i.e. false negative events). These data suggested that the true warning criteria may be lower than previously acknowledged. A systematic review of studies that reported changes in SEP or MEP monitoring and postoperative neurological outcome showed an association between changes in monitoring signals and postoperative neurological deficits. However, the confidence intervals were wide and it is not possible to determine a threshold value in SEP or MEP amplitude beyond which may indicate neurologic deficit.

SUMMARY

Current recommendations for warning criteria during intraoperative evoked potential monitoring are empirically derived. Until a threshold that predicts spinal cord injury can be accurately determined, it remains difficult to define the clinical utility of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during the surgery of spinal arteriovenous malformation: sensitivity, specificity, and warning criteria

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of spinal arteriovenous malformation (SAVM) is low, but its treatment is challenging. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for intramedullary tumors has been a benchmark in neurosurgery. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and warning criteria of IONM for SAVM surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2012 to January 2016, 55 patients underwent SAVM surgery with IONM at the Neurosurgery Department of Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, China. Modified McCormick grading scale was used to evaluate patients' function 3 days before and immediately, 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. IONM was performed including somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), trans-cranial motor-evoked potential (tcMEP), and electromyography (EMG). All patients were followed up every 3 or 6 months.

RESULTS

The SAVM locations were cervical spine in 15 (27.3%) patients, thoracic in 24 (43.6%), thoracolumbar in 12 (21.8%), and lumbar in 4 (7.3%). TcMEP and SEP were could be monitored in 53 (96.4%) and 33 (60.0%) patients, respectively. Using >80% irreversible amplitude reduction of the tcMEP as threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 77.3%, 87.1%, 81.0%, and 84.4%, respectively; using >50% irreversible amplitude reduction of the tcMEP as the warning criterion, these values were 81.8% 74.2%, 69.2%, and 85.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In practical applications of tcMEP for SAVM surgeries, the 50% irreversible amplitude reduction of the tcMEP criterion can be used to warn the surgeon, while the >80% criterion can be used to stop the operation in order to avoid neurological impairments.

Benefit of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in a Pediatric Patient with Spinal Dysmorphism, Split Cord Malformation, and Scoliosis

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) consists of a group of neurodiagnostic techniques that assess the nervous system's functional integrity during surgical operations. A retrospective analysis of a pediatric female patient was conducted who underwent 12 operations for the correction of scoliosis, tethered cord, and split spinal cord wherein IONM played an important role. From age 3 to 6, she underwent six procedures including a release of the tethered cord, resection of the filum terminale, removal of a T11-T12 bony spur, release of L3 adhesions, repair of subcutaneous meningocele, and correction of scoliosis with a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rod (VEPTR) technique without the use of IONM. However, a multimodality IONM protocol with somatosensory evoked potentials, transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCeMEP), and an electromyogram was utilized during the later procedures. At age 6 (the seventh procedure), a VEPTR expansion was performed, with loss and recovery of the lower extremity motor evoked potentials. The postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a partial split cord malformation with retethering of the spinal cord. We repaired her split cord malformation and tethered cord while employing IONM. Using IONM for her operation was crucial because a sudden significant loss of TCeMEP resulted in a cancellation of the procedure; the MRI showed a thick remnant attached to the spinal cord. If the procedure was performed without IONM, we could have missed the underlying pathology, an error that may have resulted in paraplegia. We strongly recommend using IONM during high-risk surgical procedures to help significantly reduce the risk of permanent postoperative complications.

Intraoperative monitoring for spinal radiculomedullary artery aneurysm occlusion treatment: What, when, and how long?

BACKGROUND

Spinal radiculomedullary artery aneurysms are extremely rare. Treatment should be tailored to clinical presentation, distal aneurysm flow, and lesion anatomical features. When a surgical occlusion is planned, it is necessary to evaluate whether intraoperative monitoring (IOM) should be considered as an indispensable tool to prevent potential spinal cord ischemia.

METHODS

We present a patient with symptoms and signs of spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage resulting from the rupture of a T4 anterior radiculomedullary aneurysm who underwent open surgical treatment under motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring.

RESULTS

Due to the aneurysmal fusiform shape and preserved distal flow, the afferent left anterior radiculomedullary artery was temporarily clipped; 2 minutes after the clamping, the threshold stimulation level rose higher than 100 V, and at minute 3, MEPs amplitude became attenuated over 50%. This was considered as a warning criteria to leave the vessel occlusion. The radiculomedullary aneurysm walls were reinforced and wrapped with muscle and fibrin glue to prevent re-bleeding. The patient awoke from general anesthesia without focal neurologic deficit and made an uneventful recovery with complete resolution of her symptoms and signs.

CONCLUSION

This paper attempts to build awareness of the possibility to cause or worsen a neurological deficit if a radiculomedullary aneurysm with preserved distal flow is clipped or embolized without an optimal IOM control. We report in detail MEP monitoring during the occlusion of a unilateral T4 segmental artery that supplies an anterior radiculomedullary artery aneurysm.

Overview on Criteria for MEP Monitoring

Intraoperative motor evoked potentials include the D-wave as a surrogate for long-term motor outcome and muscle motor evoked potentials as a surrogate for early outcome. Their efficacy depends on excluding confounding factors and on warning criteria; insufficiently sensitive criteria could result in unpredicted deficits, whereas excessively sensitive ones could cause false alarms deterring surgical treatment and jading surgeons to alerts, eventually leading to deficits through failure to intervene. Although D-waves have few indications, they are nonsynaptic, linear, and stable-properties that support amplitude reduction criteria: >50% for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery and >30% to 40% for peri-Rolandic brain surgery. Muscle motor evoked potentials have many indications but are polysynaptic, nonlinear, and unstable-properties that challenge warning criteria and make them unusually capricious and sensitive. Disappearance is a remarkably frequent pathologic sign compared with other evoked potentials and is always a major criterion. Marked (>80%) amplitude reduction may be a minor or moderate spinal cord criterion, depending on the surgical circumstance. Modest (>50%) reduction may be a major criterion for brain, brainstem, and facial nerve monitoring, if justified by sufficient preceding stability. Acute ≥100-V threshold elevation may be a minor or moderate spinal cord criterion, depending on the surgical circumstance and on adherence to reported methodology. Morphology criteria lack support. Tailoring warning criteria to different monitoring situations based on anatomy, surgical goals, and published evidence seems advisable.

Diagnostic accuracy of motor evoked potentials to detect neurological deficit during idiopathic scoliosis correction: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring in predicting an impending neurological deficit during corrective spinal surgery for patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS).

METHODS

The authors searched the PubMed and Web of Science database for relevant lists of retrieved reports and/or experiments published from January 1950 through October 2014 for studies on TcMEP monitoring use during IS surgery. The primary analysis of this review fit the operating characteristic into a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve model to determine the efficacy of intraoperative TcMEP-predicted change.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, with a total of 2102 patients with IS were included. Analysis found an observed incidence of neurological deficits of 1.38% (29/2102) in the sample population. Of the patients who sustained a neurological deficit, 82.8% (24/29) also had irreversible TcMEP change, whereas 17.2% (5/29) did not. The pooled analysis using the bivariate model showed TcMEP change with sensitivity (mean 91% [95% CI 34%–100%]) and specificity (mean 96% [95% CI 92–98%]). The diagnostic odds ratio indicated that it is 250 times more likely to observe significant TcMEP changes in patients who experience a new-onset motor deficit immediately after IS correction surgery (95% CI 11–5767). TcMEP monitoring showed high discriminant ability with an area under the curve of 0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient with a new neurological deficit resulting from IS surgery was 250 times more likely to have changes in TcMEPs than a patient without new deficit. The authors' findings from 2102 operations in patients with IS show that TcMEP monitoring is a highly sensitive and specific test for detecting new spinal cord injuries in patients undergoing corrective spinal surgery for IS. They could not assess the value of TcMEP monitoring as a therapeutic adjunct owing to the limited data available and their study design.

Intraoperative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring in spinal tumor surgery: sirens or indispensable tools?

Spinal tumor (ST) surgery carries the risk of new neurological deficits in the postoperative period. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring and mapping (IONM) represents an effective method of identifying and monitoring in real time the functional integrity of both the spinal cord (SC) and the nerve roots (NRs). Despite consensus favoring the use of IONM in ST surgery, in this era of evidence-based medicine, there is still a need to demonstrate the effective role of IONM in ST surgery in achieving an oncological cure, optimizing patient safety, and considering medicolegal aspects. Thus, neurosurgeons are asked to establish which techniques are considered indispensable. In the present study, the authors focused on the rationale for and the accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) of IONM in ST surgery in light of more recent evidence in the literature, with specific emphasis on the role of IONM in reducing the incidence of postoperative neurological deficits. This review confirms the role of IONM as a useful tool in the workup for ST surgery. Individual monitoring and mapping techniques are clearly not sufficient to account for the complex function of the SC and NRs. Conversely, multimodal IONM is highly sensitive and specific for anticipating neurological injury during ST surgery and represents an important tool for preserving neuronal structures and achieving an optimal postoperative functional outcome.

Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Disappearance versus Amplitude-Decrement Alarm Criteria During Cervical Spinal Surgery: A Long-Term Prognosis

Background and Purpose

We studied the clinical significance of amplitude-reduction and disappearance alarm criteria for transcranial electric muscle motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) during cervical spinal surgery according to different lesion locations [intramedullary (IM) vs. nonintramedullary (NIM)] by evaluating the long-term postoperative motor status.

Methods

In total, 723 patients were retrospectively dichotomized into the IM and NIM groups. Each limb was analyzed respectively. One hundred and sixteen limbs from 30 patients with IM tumors and 2,761 limbs from 693 patients without IM tumors were enrolled. Postoperative motor deficits were assessed up to 6 months after surgery.

Results

At the end of surgery, 61 limbs (2.2%) in the NIM group and 14 limbs (12.1%) in the IM group showed MEP amplitudes that had decreased to below 50% of baseline, with 13 of the NIM limbs (21.3%) and 2 of the IM limbs (14.3%) showing MEP disappearance. Thirteen NIM limbs (0.5%) and 5 IM limbs (4.3%) showed postoperative motor deficits. The criterion for disappearance showed a lower sensitivity for the immediate motor deficit than did the criterion for amplitude decrement in both the IM and NIM groups. However, the disappearance criterion showed the same sensitivity as the 70%-decrement criterion in IM (100%) and NIM (83%) surgeries for the motor deficit at 6 months after surgery. Moreover, it has the highest specificity for the motor deficits among diverse alarm criteria, from 24 hours to 6 months after surgery, in both the IM and NIM groups.

Conclusions

The MEP disappearance alarm criterion had a high specificity in predicting the long-term prognosis after cervical spinal surgery. However, because it can have a low sensitivity in predicting an immediate postoperative deficit, combining different MEP alarm criteria according to the aim of specific instances of cervical spinal surgery is likely to be useful in practical intraoperative monitoring.

Efficacy and safety of novel high-frequency multi-train stimulation for recording transcranial motor evoked potentials in a rat model

Recently, low-frequency multi-train stimulation (MTS) was shown to effectively enhance transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs). In contrast, high- frequency double-train stimulation was reported to elicit a marked facilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of high-frequency MTS in the augmentation of potentials. In addition, we investigated the safety of high-frequency MTS, behaviorally and histologically. TcMEPs were recorded from the triceps surae muscle in 38 rats. A multipulse stimulus was delivered repeatedly at different rates (2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 Hz), and was defined as MTS. A conditioned taste aversion method was used to investigate the effect of high-frequency MTS on learning and memory function. Subsequently, animals were sacrificed, and the brains were removed and examined using the standard hematoxylin-eosin method. Compared with conventional single train stimulation, TcMEP amplitudes increased 1.3, 2.1, 1.9, and 2.0 times on average with 5, 10, 20, and 50 Hz stimulation, respectively. The aversion index was >0.8 in all animals after they received 100 high-frequency MTSs. Histologically, no pathological changes were evident in the rat brains. High-frequency MTS shows potential to effectively enhance TcMEP responses, and to be used safely in transcranial brain stimulation.

Effect of peripheral nerve tetanic stimulation on the inter-trial variability and accuracy of transcranial motor-evoked potential in brain surgery

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the advantages of post-tetanic motor-evoked potential (p-MEP) and conventional motor-evoked potential (c-MEP) in terms of MEP inter-trial variability and accuracy.

METHODS

c-MEP and p-MEP were quantified in subjects who underwent brain surgery. c-MEP was generated by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES). p-MEP was generated using a preconditioning process involving tetanic stimulation at the left tibial nerve followed by TES. The presence of significant MEP deterioration was monitored during major surgical process. An additional 5-8 MEP obtained after major surgical process were used to analyze amplitude parameters such as mean, standard deviation, range, coefficient of variation (CV), and range to mean ratio.

RESULTS

When only irreversible MEP deteriorations were considered as positive results, the false-positive rate was identical for p-MEP and c-MEP. When total MEP deteriorations were considered as positive results, the false-positive rate of p-MEP was lower and p-MEP had higher specificity than c-MEP. The mean amplitude of p-MEP was significantly higher than that of c-MEP. The CV and range to mean ratio of p-MEP were less than those of c-MEP.

CONCLUSION

The p-MEP technique is useful for augmenting MEP amplitude and reducing inter-trial variability.

SIGNIFICANCE

p-MEP has clinical significance as a useful technique for intraoperative monitoring.

A novel threshold criterion in transcranial motor evoked potentials during surgery for gliomas close to the motor pathway

OBJECTIVE Warning criteria for monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP) after direct cortical stimulation during surgery for supratentorial tumors have been well described. However, little is known about the value of MEP after transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in predicting postoperative motor deficit when monitoring threshold level. The authors aimed to evaluate the feasibility and value of this method in glioma surgery by using a new approach for interpreting changes in threshold level involving contra- and ipsilateral MEP. METHODS Between November 2013 and December 2014, 93 patients underwent TES-MEP monitoring during resection of gliomas located close to central motor pathways but not involving the primary motor cortex. The MEP were elicited by transcranial repetitive anodal train stimulation. Bilateral MEP were continuously evaluated to assess percentage increase of threshold level (minimum voltage needed to evoke a stable motor response from each of the muscles being monitored) from the baseline set before dural opening. An increase in threshold level on the contralateral side (facial, arm, or leg muscles contralateral to the affected hemisphere) of more than 20% beyond the percentage increase on the ipsilateral side (facial, arm, or leg muscles ipsilateral to the affected hemisphere) was considered a significant alteration. Recorded alterations were subsequently correlated with postoperative neurological deterioration and MRI findings. RESULTS TES-MEP could be elicited in all patients, including those with recurrent glioma (31 patients) and preoperative paresis (20 patients). Five of 73 patients without preoperative paresis showed a significant increase in threshold level, and all of them developed new paresis postoperatively (transient in 4 patients and permanent in 1 patient). Eight of 20 patients with preoperative paresis showed a significant increase in threshold level, and all of them developed postoperative neurological deterioration (transient in 4 patients and permanent in 4 patients). In 80 patients no significant change in threshold level was detected, and none of them showed postoperative neurological deterioration. The specificity and sensitivity in this series were estimated at 100%. Postoperative MRI revealed gross-total tumor resection in 56 of 82 patients (68%) in whom complete tumor resection was attainable; territorial ischemia was detected in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS The novel threshold criterion has made TES-MEP a useful method for predicting postoperative motor deficit in patients who undergo glioma surgery, and has been feasible in patients with preoperative paresis as well as in patients with recurrent glioma. Including contra- and ipsilateral changes in threshold level has led to a high sensitivity and specificity.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) for Cordotomy Procedures

This case illustrates the benefits of utilizing intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for preventing injury to sensory/motor pathways of the spinal cord during a cordotomy procedure to relieve pain. Cordotomy has been used effectively in the treatment of visceral pain but comes with a high risk of damaging motor and sensory pathways due to close proximity of lesion. The subject is a 47-year-old female with a pancoast tumor of the left lung, left brachialplexopathy, and severe neuropathic pain syndrome, refractory to medical therapy. A palliative cordotomy procedure was elected for pain control. Baseline bilateral posterior tibial and median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were present except in the left upper extremity. Transcranial electric motor evoked potential (TCeMEP) baselines were present in all extremities except the left upper. Total intravenous anesthesia was used. The spine was exposed at C2-C3 and a right single anterolateral cordotomy was performed with an immediate drop in TCeMEPs (70-80% amplitude reduction) in the right upper and right lower extremities. The surgeon decided to stop the cordotomy at that point. Postoperatively, the patient had no sensory or motor deficit. In this patient, TCeMEPs were used effectively to guide the surgeon in preventing damage to the spinal cord that could lead to motor deficits.

Implementation of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring during Endovascular Procedures in the Central Nervous System

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) has been used in different surgical disciplines since the 1980s. Nonetheless, regular routine use of IOM in interventional neuroradiology units has only been reported in a few centers. The aim of this study is to report our experience, 1 year after deciding to implement standardized IOM during endovascular treatment of vascular abnormalities of the central nervous system.

METHODS

Basic recordings included somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). Corticobulbar motor-evoked potentials and flash-visual-evoked potentials were also recorded depending on the topography of the lesion. Intra-arterial provocative tests (PTs) with amobarbital and lidocaine were also performed. All patients except 1 were under total intravenous anesthesia. Clinical outcome was assessed prospectively and correlated with IOM events.

RESULTS

Twelve patients and 15 procedures were monitored during the inclusion period. Significant IOM events were detected during 3 of the 15 procedures (20%). We observed temporary MEP changes in 2 cases which resolved after interruption of the embolization or application of corrective measures, leaving no postoperative neurological deficits. In 1 case, persistent SEP and MEP deterioration was detected secondary to a frontal hematoma, resulting in mild sensory-motor deficit in the right upper extremity after the procedure. Overall, 12 PTs (4 spinal cord and 8 brain abnormalities) were performed using lidocaine and sodium amytal injections. One positive result occurred after the injection of lidocaine. No false negatives were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

IOM may provide continuous real-time data about the functional status of eloquent areas and pathways of the central nervous system in patients under general anesthesia. It therefore allows us to detect early neurological damage in time to perform specific actions that may prevent irreversible neurological deficits.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Facial Nerve Motor-Evoked Potentials in Children

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring of the facial nerve (FNMEP) during eloquent tumor resection is feasible in children and can predict both immediate and postoperative facial nerve (FN) function.

METHODS

We included 24 consecutive procedures involving 21 patients (median age 5.5 years, range 5 months to 15 years, 8 female) who were operated on with FNMEP monitoring by the first author in 2013 and 2014. During surgery, we maintained a constant response amplitude by increasing the stimulation intensity and aimed to establish a warning criterion based on the "threshold-level" method. A threshold increase of greater than 20 mA for eliciting the FNMEP in the most reliable facial nerve target muscle was considered to be a prediction of reduced postoperative facial nerve function and consequently, a warning was given to the surgeon. The preoperative and early postoperative function was documented with the House-Brackmann grading system.

RESULTS

Monitoring of the FNMEP was feasible in all the surgeries in at least one facial nerve target muscle. The orbicularis oris muscle yielded the best result (95% of the trials), followed by the mentalis (87%) and orbicularis oculi muscles (86%). The median stimulation threshold was initially 65 mA (range 40-110 mA) for the FNMEP and 60 mA (15-220 mA) for the motor-evoked potential of the thenar muscles. The FNMEP deterioration showed a sensitivity of 100% for House-Brackmann deterioration and specificity of 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative FNMEP monitoring is feasible and safe in infants and children. We found no evidence that the procedures and thresholds should differ from FNMEP monitoring in adults. FNMEP monitoring provides valid evidence for FN function in pediatric eloquent area surgery; its use is complementary to direct electrical FN stimulation and continuous EMG monitoring of FN target muscles.

Early detection of pedicle screw-related spinal cord injury by continuous intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM)

Pedicle screw placement has a high risk of damaging the motor and sensory pathways due to the close proximity to the spinal cord and nerve roots. Early detection and prevention of injury can be achieved by utilizing Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP) and Transcranial electrical Motor Evoked Potentials (TCeMEP) during a scoliosis surgery. A 19-year-old female presented for correction of scoliosis. After intubation, electrodes were placed for upper and lower SSEPs, EMGs and TCeMEPs. Total intravenous anesthesia was used. Baseline SSEP and TCeMEP responses were present in all limbs. Eight pedicle screws were placed. After placing the last screw, TCeMEP signals were lost bilaterally in lower extremities. Surgery was paused. After removing all the screws TCeMEP responses returned to baseline in left lower limb but remained absent in right lower limb. A wake-up test was performed which was positive in her right leg. Blood pressure was increased and bolus of steroids was given. There was no improvement in right lower limb TCeMEP responses. Surgeon was advised to stop the surgery and proceed for MRI and follow-up. SSEP signals remained stable in all four-extremities. The surgical correction was cancelled. MRI revealed intramedullary spinal cord ischemic changes at T11. After extubation, patient was unable to move her right lower extremity with flaccid paralysis. She also complained about severe burning in her left lower extremity. The patient was taken for rehabilitation exercises. One week post-op, she was moving hip flexors and two weeks later had afull motor function, bilaterally. Real-time IONM was useful in early identification of spinal cord injury. Significant changes were seen in TCeMEP, without any change in SSEP. We highly recommend utilizing continuous TCeMEP and SSEP monitoring during pedicle screw placement for prevention of injury to the spinal cord. In this case, the patient would have been paralyzed post-operatively without the use of IONM.

Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

False-positive loss of transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCe-MEPs) limits the efficacy of motor tract monitoring during spine surgery. Although total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is widely regarded as the optimal regimen for TCe-MEPs, inhalational anesthesia is an alternative regimen.

PURPOSE

To compare the rates of false-positive TCe-MEPs during spine surgery for patients anesthetized with TIVA and inhalation anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of data collected from consecutive patients undergoing TCe-MEP monitoring during spinal surgery.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Consecutive adult patients from multiple surgical centers undergoing spine surgery inclusive of cervical or thoracic spinal levels during 2008-2009 who received TIVA or inhalation anesthesia.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the rate of false-positive alerts using TCe-MEPS, defined as a persistent loss of 90% or greater of the amplitude of TCe-MEP in one or more muscles not attributed to technical or transient systemic factors (hypotension or hypoxia) and not associated with any postoperative neurologic deficit.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups according to anesthetic regimen: those anesthetized with one or more inhalational agents (n=1,303) and patients anesthetized with TIVA (n=511). The Fisher exact test and unpaired t test were used to compare group characteristics and false-positive rates. Each group was further subdivided by spinal region (cervical, thoracic, and thoracolumbar) and by presence of preoperative motor deficit. A Pearson chi-squared test was used to identify differences according to spinal region. This study was not supported by any financial sources nor do the authors have any financial relationships to disclose.

RESULTS

Patient with inhaled anesthesia showed significantly higher rates of false-positive TCe-MEP changes (15.0% vs. 3.2%) compared with the TIVA group. These differences were significant across all surgical subgroups. The inhaled group had a larger number of patients with preoperative motor deficits compared with TIVA (45.0% vs. 37.4%), a potential confounder for false-positive results. However, a significantly higher rate of false-positive TCe-MEP changes was still observed in the inhaled group (11.4% vs. 0.6% for TIVA) when analyzing only those patients without preoperative motor deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of inhalation anesthesia during adult spinal surgery is associated with significantly higher rates of false-positive changes compared with TIVA during TCe-MEP monitoring. This relationship appears independent of preoperative motor status. Further study and multivariate analysis of anesthetic agents, diagnosis, and symptoms is necessary to elucidate the impact of these variables. The potential confounding effects of inhalational anesthesia on TCe-MEP monitoring should be considered when determining anesthetic regimen.

Combined muscle motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) with combined muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials is useful for more aggressive and safe resection in intramedullary spinal cord tumour (IMSCT) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed data from consecutive patients who underwent surgery for IMSCT between 1998 and April 2012. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether or not IONM was applied. In the monitored group, the procedures were performed under IONM using 75% muscle amplitude decline weaning criteria. The control group was comprised of patients who underwent IMSCT surgery without IONM. The primary outcome was the rate of gross total excision of the tumour on magnetic resonance imaging at one week after surgery. The secondary outcome was the neurologic outcome based on the McCormick Grade scale.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar demographics. The total gross removal tended to increase when intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring was used, but this tendency did not reach statistical significance (76% versus 58%; univariate analysis, p=0.049; multivariate regression model, p=0.119). The serial McCormick scale score was similar between the two groups (based on repeated measure ANOVA).

CONCLUSION

Our study evaluated combined IONM of trans-cranial electrical (Tce)-mMEPs and SEPs for IMSCT. During IMSCT surgery, combined Tce-mMEPs and SEPs using 75% muscle amplitude weaning criteria did not result in significant improvement in the rate of gross total excision of the tumour or neurologic outcome.

Augmentation of motor evoked potentials using multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation in intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery

Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are widely used to monitor motor function during spinal surgery. Improvements in transcranial stimulation techniques and general anesthesia have made it possible to record reliable and reproducible potentials. However, TcMEPs are much smaller in amplitude compared with compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by maximal peripheral nerve stimulation. In this study, multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation (mt-TES) was introduced to enhance TcMEPs, and the optimal setting of mt-TES was investigated. In 30 patients undergoing surgical correction of spinal deformities (4 males and 26 females with normal motor status; age range 11-75 years), TcMEPs from the abductor hallucis (AH) and quadriceps femoris (QF) were analyzed. A multipulse (train) stimulus with an individual pulse width of 0.5 ms and an inter-pulse interval of 2 ms was delivered repeatedly (2-7 times) at different rates (2, 5, and 10 Hz). TcMEP amplitudes increased with the number of train stimuli for AH, with the strongest facilitation observed at 5 Hz. The response amplitude increased 6.1 times on average compared with single-train transcranial electrical stimulation (st-TES). This trend was also observed in the QF. No adverse events (e.g., seizures, cardiac arrhythmias, scalp burns, accidental injury resulting from patient movement) were observed in any patients. Although several facilitative techniques using central or peripheral stimuli, preceding transcranial electrical stimulation, have been recently employed to augment TcMEPs during surgery, responses are still much smaller than CMAPs. Changing from conventional st-TES to mt-TES has potential to greatly enhance TcMEP responses.

Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring

The following intraoperative MEP recommendations can be made on the basis of current evidence and expert opinion: (1) Acquisition and interpretation should be done by qualified personnel. (2) The methods are sufficiently safe using appropriate precautions. (3) MEPs are an established practice option for cortical and subcortical mapping and for monitoring during surgeries risking motor injury in the brain, brainstem, spinal cord or facial nerve. (4) Intravenous anesthesia usually consisting of propofol and opioid is optimal for muscle MEPs. (5) Interpretation should consider limitations and confounding factors. (6) D-wave warning criteria consider amplitude reduction having no confounding factor explanation: >50% for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, and >30-40% for peri-Rolandic surgery. (7) Muscle MEP warning criteria are tailored to the type of surgery and based on deterioration clearly exceeding variability with no confounding factor explanation. Disappearance is always a major criterion. Marked amplitude reduction, acute threshold elevation or morphology simplification could be additional minor or moderate spinal cord monitoring criteria depending on the type of surgery and the program's technique and experience. Major criteria for supratentorial, brainstem or facial nerve monitoring include >50% amplitude reduction when warranted by sufficient preceding response stability. Future advances could modify these recommendations.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: basic principles and recent update

The recent developments of new devices and advances in anesthesiology have greatly improved the utility and accuracy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM). Herein, we review the basic principles of the electrophysiological methods employed under IOM in the operating room. These include motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, electroencephalography, electromyography, brainstem auditory evoked potentials, and visual evoked potentials. Most of these techniques have certain limitations and their utility is still being debated. In this review, we also discuss the optimal stimulation/recording method for each of these modalities during individual surgeries as well as the diverse criteria for alarm signs.

Facial nerve motor evoked potentials during skull base surgery to monitor facial nerve function using the threshold-level method

Object

During surgeries that put the facial nerve at risk for injury, its function can be continuously monitored by transcranial facial nerve motor evoked potentials (FNMEPs) in facial nerve target muscles. Despite their advantages, FNMEPs are not yet widely used. While most authors use a 50% reduction in FNMEP response amplitudes as a warning criterion, in this paper the authors' approach was to keep the response amplitude constant by increasing the stimulation intensity and to establish a warning criterion based on the “threshold-level” method.

Methods

The authors included 34 consecutive procedures involving 33 adult patients (median age 47 years) in whom FNMEPs were monitored. A threshold increase greater than 20 mA for eliciting FNMEPs in the most reliable facial nerve target muscle was considered a prediction of reduced postoperative facial nerve function, and subsequently a warning was issued to the surgeon. Preoperative and early postoperative function was documented using the House-Brackmann grading system.

Results

Monitoring of FNMEPs was feasible in all 34 surgeries in at least one facial nerve target muscle. The mentalis muscle yielded the best results. The House-Brackmann grade deteriorated in 17 (50%) of 34 cases. The warning criterion was reached in 18 (53%) of 34 cases, which predicted an 83% risk of House-Brackmann grade deterioration. Sensitivity amounted to 88% (CI 64%–99%) and specificity to 82% (CI 57%–96%). Deterioration of FNMEPs and a worse House-Brackmann grade showed a high degree of association (p < 0.001). The impact of FNMEP monitoring on surgical strategy is exemplified in an illustrative case.

Conclusions

In surgeries that put the facial nerve at risk, the intraoperative increase in FNMEP stimulation threshold was closely correlated to postoperative facial nerve dysfunction. Monitoring of FNMEPs is a valid indicator of facial nerve function in skull base surgery. It should be used as an adjunct to direct electrical facial nerve stimulation and continuous electromyographic monitoring of facial nerve target muscles.

Relevance of intraoperative D wave in spine and spinal cord surgeries

PURPOSE

The combined recordings of epidural-(D wave) and muscle motor evoked potentials (m-MEPs) have been proposed in many studies in intramedullary spinal cord tumour (IMSCT) surgery, although not all agree. Furthermore, the usefulness of the intraoperative monitoring of motor systems using these methods in other types of spine surgery has not yet been clearly confirmed. The aim of this study is to test the impact of intraoperative D wave on the monitorability and motor outcome in spine surgery.

METHODS

Intraoperative recording of posterior tibial nerve somatosensory potentials, lower limb m-MEPs (LLm-MEPs) and epidurally recorded D wave caudally to the surgical level was attempted in a total of 103 spine and spinal cord surgeries (23 IMSCT, 55 extramedullary spinal cord tumours and 25 myelopathies).

RESULTS

There was a 97.1 %, overall monitorability where at least 1 of the 3 modalities was applicable in 100 surgical procedures. Baseline LLm-MEPs were recorded bilaterally in 85 cases and unilaterally in 11. A caudal D wave was recorded in 97 cases. Transient, or persistent intraoperative modifications occurred in 14/23 IMSCT, 5/55 extramedullary spinal cord tumours and in 2/25 myelopathies. The presence of a persistent stable caudal D wave was predictive of a good motor outcome even when the LL-MEPs were absent and/or when lost during surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Not only is intraoperative D wave recording to be considered mandatory in IMSCT surgery but it should also be attempted in other types of spine/spinal cord surgeries.