Implications of lumbar plexus anatomy for removal of total disc replacements through a posterior approach

Is there a variance in complication types associated with ALIF approaches? A systematic review

Purpose

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-established alternative to posterior-based interbody fusion techniques, with approach variations, such as retroperitoneal, transperitoneal, open, and laparoscopic well described. Variable rates of complications for each approach have been enumerated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the comparative rates of complications across approach type.

Methods

A systematic review of search databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and OVID Medline was made to identify studies related to complication-associated ALIF. PRISMA guidelines were utilised for this review. Meta-analysis was used to compare intraoperative and postoperative complications with ALIF for each approach.

Results

A total of 4575 studies were identified, with 5728 patients across 31 studies included for review following application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis demonstrated the transperitoneal approach resulted in higher rates of retrograde ejaculation (RE) (p < 0.001; CI = 0.05–0.21) and overall rates of complications (p = 0.05; CI = 0.00–0.23). Rates of RE were higher at the L5/S1 intervertebral level. Rates of vessel injury were not significantly higher in either approach method (p = 0.89; CI =  − 0.04–0.07). Rates of visceral injury did not appear to be related to approach method. Laparoscopic approaches resulted in shorter inpatient stays (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Despite the transperitoneal approach being comparatively underpowered, its use appears to result in a significantly higher rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, although confounders including use of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and spinal level should be considered. Laparoscopic approaches resulted in shorter hospital stays; however, its steep learning curve and longer operative time have deterred surgeons from its widespread adaptation.

Projection of the Most Anterior Line of the Spinal Canal on Lateral Radiograph: An Anatomic Study for Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty

ABSTRACTPurpose: To measure the projection of the most anterior line of the spinal canal on lateral radiographs of the vertebra (C3-L5) and evaluate the efficacy of the safety line (SL) in preventing intraspinal cement leakage in percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Materials and Methods: Fifteen adult dry-bone spine specimens were analyzed. The projection of the SL was viewed on lateral radiographs. The distance between the SL and the posterior vertebral body line (PVBL) was measured. Two groups of patients were treated by PKP, and cement injection was stopped either before the PBVL (group 1) or before the SL (group 2) under lateral fluoroscopy. The rate of cement leakage was compared between the two groups. Results: The largest distance between the SL and PVBL was at L1 (5.22 ± 0.62 mm). From L1 to L5, the distance decreased progressively to 1.05 ± 0.64 mm. Similar variation was also observed from L1 to T1 (0.19 ± 0.18 mm). The postoperative computed tomography scan was more sensitive and accurate in detecting intraspinal leakage than radiography in group 1 (p = 0.000); however, there was no significant difference in sensitivity or accuracy between methods in group 2 (p = 0.063). The rate of intraspinal cement leakage was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 (p = 0.000). Conclusions: The operator should frequently check to ensure that cement injection has stopped upon reaching the SL. Surgeons may benefit from this quantitative anatomical study of PKP and PVP.

The projection of nerve roots on the posterior aspect of spine from T11 to L5: a cadaver and radiological study

STUDY DESIGN

A cadaver and radiological study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the projection of nerve roots on the posterior aspect of the spine from T11 to L5.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Understanding the projection of nerve roots on the posterior lamina will help to determine the decompressing areas of lamina and avoiding unnecessary bony resection. It can prevent segmental instability and postoperative scar formation. No studies regarding this subject are available.

METHODS

Fifteen formalin-preserved spine specimens were used for this study. After exposing the dural sac and bilateral nerve roots, small pieces of stainless steel wires were placed along the root sleeves from their points of origin, and then standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken. Parameters were measured directly on radiographs using the picture archiving communication system. Measurements included: (1) take-off angles of the nerve roots at the coronal (CA) and sagittal planes (SA); (2) distance from the origin of the root sleeve to the posterior midline (DM); (3) distance from the origin of the root sleeve to the superior (DS) and inferior margin (DI) of its corresponding lamina; and (4) distance between the origins of neighboring nerve roots (DR).

RESULTS

The CA statistically decreased from T11 (52.4° ± 3.13°) to L5 (25.8° ± 3.10°). An opposite variation tendency was observed in SA. The DS increased from 1.8 ± 0.32 mm for T11 to 5.84 ± 1.05 mm for L5. No consistent change was found at DI. The DR was largest at the L1-L2 interval (33.9 ± 1.40 mm) and it decreased progressively to L4-L5 (25.5 ± 2.40 mm). DM statistically increased from T11 (8.9 ± 1.51 mm) to L1 (10.9 ± 1.11 mm) and then progressively decreased until it reached a minimum at L5 (8.1 ± 0.83 mm).

CONCLUSION

The precise projection of nerve roots to the posterior aspect of spine and intraspinal take-off angles at the sagittal plane have been presented. Surgical interventions of the lumbar disc and nerve root may benefit from this quantitative anatomical study.

Critical analysis of extra peritoneal antero-lateral approach for lumbar plexus

Lesions of lumbar plexus are uncommon and descriptions of surgical access are derived from vertebral spine approaches.

METHOD

The extraperitoneal anterolateral approach to the lumbar plexus was performed in six adult fresh cadavers. The difficulties on dissection were related.

RESULTS

An exposure of all distal elements of lumbar plexus was possible, but a cranial extension of the incision was needed to reach the iliohypogastric nerve in all cases. Ligation of vessels derived from common iliac artery was necessary for genitofemoral and obturator nerves exposure in two cases. The most proximal part of the lumbar roots could be identified only after dissection and clipping of most lumbar vessels.

CONCLUSION

The extraperitoneal anterolateral approach allows appropriate exposure of terminal nerves of lumbar plexus laterallly to psoas major muscle. Cranial extension of the cutaneous incision may be necessary for exposure of iliohypogastric nerve. Roots exposure increases the risk of vascular damage.