Is rheumatoid arthritis a risk factor for a high-riding vertebral artery?

C2 pedicle screw insertion assisted by mobilization of the vertebral artery in cases with high-riding vertebral artery

Objective

To describe the feasibility, safety and efficacy of mobilization of the vertebral artery for C2 pedicle screws in cases with the high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA).
.

Methods

During the period January 2020 to September 2022, fifteen patients underwent posterior occipitocervical fixation in our department. All patients had unilateral HRVA on at least one side that prohibited the insertion of C2 pedicle screws. There were 2 males and 13 females aged 47 ± 11.9 years (range: 17-64 years). After the correction of the vertical dislocation during the operation, the C2 pedicle screw insertion and occipitocervical fixation and fusion were performed using the vertebral artery mobilization technique. A routine three-dimensional reconstructed CT examination was executed to confirm the trajectory of C2 pedicle screws post-operation, and a CT angiography examination was performed when necessary. Neurological function was assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale. The preoperative and postoperative JOA score and the main radiological measurements, including anterior atlantodental interval (ADI), the distance of odontoid tip above Chamberlain line, and clivus-canal angle (CCA), were collected and compared by paired t-test.

Results

All 15 patients had atlas assimilation, among which 12 patients had C2-C3 fusion (Klippel-Feil syndrome). Mobilization of the HRVA was successfully completed, and C2 pedicle screws were then fulfilled after the vertebral artery was protected. There was no injury to the vertebral artery during the operation. Meanwhile, no severe surgical complications such as cerebral infarction or aggravated neurological dysfunction occurred during the perioperative period. Satisfactory C2 pedicle screw placement and reduction were reached in all 15 patients. All the patients achieved bone fusion 6 months after surgery. No looseness and shift of internal fixation or reduction loss was observed during the follow-up period. Compared to the preoperative, the postoperative JOA score and the main radiological measurements were remarkably improved and statistically significant.

Conclusions

C2 pedicle screw insertion assisted by mobilization of the vertebral artery is safe and considerably effective, providing a choice for internal fixation in cases with high-riding vertebral arteries.

Unilateral high-riding vertebral artery is associated with asymmetric morphological changes of the atlantoaxial joint: a novel risk factor for atlantoaxial osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the association between unilateral high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) and morphological changes in the atlantoaxial joint (AAJ) and to determine whether unilateral HRVA is a risk factor for atlantoaxial osteoarthritis (AAOA).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2496 patients admitted to our medical center between January 2020 and December 2022 who underwent CT imaging of the cervical spine. Two hundred and seventy-two patients with unilateral HRVA (HRVA group) were identified and a respective 2:1 age- and sex-matched control group without HRVA was built. Morphological parameters, including C2 lateral mass settlement (C2 LMS), C1/2 coronal inclination (C1/2 CI), lateral atlanto-dental interval (LADI), and C1/2 relative rotation angle (C1/2 RRA) were measured. The degree of AAOA was recorded. Risk factors associated with AAOA were identified using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 61.4% women, and the overall average age of the study population was 48.7 years. The morphological parameters (C2 LMS, C1/2 CI, and LADI) in AAJ were asymmetric between the HRVA and the non-HRVA sides in the HRVA group (p < 0.001). These differences in parameters (d-C2 LMS, d-C1/2 CI, and d-LADI) between the HRVA and the non-HRVA sides, and C1/2 RRA were significantly larger than those in the control group. Eighty-three of 816 patients (10.2%) with AAOA had larger values of d-C2 LMS, d-C1/2 CI, d-LADI, and C1/2 RRA compared with the patients without AAOA (p < 0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that unilateral HRVA [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1-6.3, p = 0.029], age in the sixth decade or older (adjusted OR = 30.2, 95% CI: 16.1-56.9, p < 0.001), women (adjusted OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.0-5.6, P = 0.034) were independent risk factors for AAOA.

CONCLUSION

Unilateral HRVA was associated with asymmetric morphological changes of nonuniform settlement of C2 lateral mass, lateral slip of atlas, and atlantoaxial rotation displacement. Besides age ≥ 60 years and females, unilateral HRVA is an independent risk factor for AAOA.

Comparison of intraoperative CT- and cone beam CT-based spinal navigation for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Due to the complexity of neurovascular structures in the atlantoaxial region, spinal navigation for posterior C1-C2 instrumentation is nowadays a helpful tool to increase accuracy of surgery and safety of patients. Many available intraoperative navigation devices have proven their reliability in this part of the spine. Two main imaging techniques are used: intraoperative CT (iCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

PURPOSE

Comparison of iCT- and CBCT-based technologies for navigated posterior instrumentation in C1-C2 instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 81 consecutive patients from July 2014 to April 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Screw accuracy and operating time.

METHODS

Patients with C1-C2 instability received posterior instrumentation using C2 pedicle screws, C1 lateral mass or pedicle screws. All screws were inserted using intraoperative imaging either using iCT or CBCT systems and spinal navigation with autoregistration technology. Following navigated screw insertion, a second intraoperative scan was performed to assess the accuracy of screw placement. Accuracy was defined as the percentage of correctly placed screws or with minor cortical breach (<2 mm) as graded by an independent observer compared to misplaced screws.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients with C1-C2 instability were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 34 patients were operated with the use of iCT and 47 with CBCT. No significant demographic difference was found between groups. In the iCT group, 97.7% of the C1-C2 screws were correctly inserted; 2.3% showed a minor cortical breach (<2 mm); no misplacement (>2 mm). In the CBCT group, 98.9% of screws were correctly inserted; no minor pedicle breach; 1.1% showed misplacement >2 mm. Accuracy of screw placement demonstrated no significant difference between groups. Both technologies allowed sufficient identification of screw misplacement intraoperatively leading to two screw revisions in the iCT and three in the CBCT group. Median time of surgery was significantly shorter using CBCT technology (166.5 minutes [iCT] vs 122 minutes [CBCT]; p<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal navigation using either iCT- or CBCT-based systems with autoregistration allows safe and reliable screw placement and intraoperative assessment of screw positioning. Using the herein presented procedural protocols, CBCT systems allow shorter operating time.

The association between atlantoaxial instability and anomalies of vertebral artery and axis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A screw-rod system is the most widely used technique for atlantoaxial instability (AAI). However, neglecting anomalies of the vertebral artery and axis could lead to fatal complications. Whether or not the presence of AAI is associated with a more complicated anatomy for instrumentation is unclear.

PURPOSE

To analyze the association between AAI and anomalies of the vertebral artery and axis in patients with and without AAI.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred and twenty patients who underwent preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography with vertebral angiography of the cervical spine at our institution from 2012 to 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The C2 isthmus height, internal height of the C2 lateral mass, and C2 pedicle width were radiologically assessed.

METHODS

A case control study with matched cohort analysis was conducted. One hundred and twenty patients were divided into 2 groups according to presence of AAI, and the presence of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) and a narrow pedicle for insertion of the C2 pedicle screw was assessed, as was the prevalence of extraosseous vertebral artery anomaly.

RESULTS

The C2 isthmus height, C2 internal height, and C2 pedicle width were significantly narrower in the AAI group (p<.01, <.01, and <.01, respectively). A significantly greater proportion of patients with AAI had HRVA and a narrow pedicle than those without (p<.01 and < 0.01, respectively). Among patients with AAI, the C2 internal height was significantly narrower in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p<.01). Five patients (8.3%) with AAI had vertebral artery anomaly (3 fenestration, 2 persistent first intersegmental artery), while there were no vertebral artery anomalies in patients without AAI (p<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral artery anomalies are more common in patients with AAI. Furthermore, posterior instrumentation in patients with AAI has a narrower safe zone compared to that in patients without AAI, which may be caused by a long-lasting deformity rather than a congenital deformity. Therefore, more thorough preoperative evaluation of the anatomy should be performed in these patients.

Transarticular Fixation Following Mobilization of "High-Riding" Vertebral Artery

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

The article identifies the feasibility of transarticular screw fixation after mobilizing the vertebral artery in cases where it is in a "high-riding" location.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 42-yr-old male patient had a 4-yr history of progressive quadriparesis. Investigations revealed severe basilar invagination. There was assimilation of atlas and C2-3 fusion. The vertebral artery was "high-riding" into the pedicle-facet of C2 vertebra on both sides. Vertebral artery loop was exposed and mobilized inferiorly on both sides after careful drilling of pedicular bone on the posterior aspect of the dome of the artery. C2 facetal bone on the anterior face of the vertebral artery dome was now available for screw insertion. The C1-2 facets and the articulation were directly in line, making transarticular screw fixation relatively straightforward. The wide bone space available permitted insertion of 2 screws in a transarticular fashion on both sides. The patient had satisfactory clinical improvement. Imaging after 22 mo showed bone fusion across the facets.

CONCLUSION

Mobilization of the high-riding vertebral artery loop can help salvage the surgical procedure of lateral mass stabilization.

Biologic Agents Preserve the C-2 Pedicle in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparative Imaging Study Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether biologic agents (BAs) reduce a narrow C-2 pedicle screw trajectory, which is often a key stabilizer in surgical treatment, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with RA treated with and without BAs (BA [+] group [n = 50] and BA [-] group [n = 50]), respectively, were included in the present study. Computed tomography (CT) images of their cervical spine, including C-2, were analyzed. The maximum screw diameter at C-2 that could be inserted without breaching the cortex, measured on 3-dimensional images using a CT-based navigation system, was compared between the groups with and without BA administration. Furthermore, the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint was examined using CT images. The risk factors for a narrow C-2 pedicle were elucidated among the patients treated with BAs.

RESULTS

The pedicle in the BA (+) group had a significantly larger C-2 maximum screw diameter than the BA (-) group (6.00 mm vs. 5.13 mm, P < 0.001), with less destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Among the BA (+) group, a longer period until the initial administration of BAs and RA disease duration were associated with a narrow C-2 pedicle.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that BAs can maintain the trajectory for C-2 pedicle screws, which acts as a key stabilizer in surgical management for the rheumatoid cervical spine, by halting the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Early introduction of BAs can be especially important to prevent the narrowing of the C-2 pedicle.

Risk of the high-riding variant of vertebral arteries at C2 is increased over twofold in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) might lead to atlantoaxial instability requiring transpedicular or transarticular fusion. High-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) puts patients at risk of injuring the vessel. RA is hypothesized to increase a risk of HRVA. However, to date, no relative risk (RR) has been calculated in order to quantitatively determine a true impact of RA as its risk factor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to do so. All major databases were scanned for cohort studies combining words "rheumatoid arthritis" and "high-riding vertebral artery" or synonyms. RA patients were qualified into the exposed group (group A), whereas non-RA subjects into the unexposed group (group B). Risk of bias was explored by means of Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. MOOSE checklist was followed to ensure correct structure. Fixed-effects model (inverse variance) was employed. Four studies with a total of 308 subjects were included in meta-analysis. One hundred twenty-five subjects were in group A; 183 subjects were in group B. Mean age in group A was 62,1 years, whereas in group B 59,9 years. The highest risk of bias regarded "comparability" domain, whereas the lowest pertained to "selection" domain. The mean relative risk of HRVA in group A (RA) as compared with group B (non-RA) was as follows: RR = 2,11 (95% CI 1,47-3,05), I² = 15,19%, Cochrane Q = 3,54 with overall estimate significance of p < 0,001. Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with over twofold risk of developing HRVA, and therefore, vertebral arteries should be meticulously examined preoperatively before performing craniocervical fusion in every RA patient.

Prevalence of High-Riding Vertebral Artery: A Meta-Analysis of the Anatomical Variant Affecting Choice of Craniocervical Fusion Method and Its Outcome

OBJECTIVE

A high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) has been defined as a C2 isthmus height of ≤5 mm and/or internal height of ≤2 mm measured 3 mm lateral to the border of the spinal canal. Its reported prevalence has varied widely. If overlooked during the approach for craniocervical fusion, injury to the vertebral arteries can occur, affecting the outcome. The present meta-analysis aimed to provide the pooled prevalence of HRVAs.

METHODS

A comprehensive database search was conducted by 3 of us. Peer-reviewed studies that had followed the strict definition for HRVAs and had reported its prevalence were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the anatomical quality assessment tool. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. The pooled prevalence was calculated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The data from 20 studies with 3126 subjects (7496 sides) were analyzed. The overall pooled prevalence of ≥1 HRVA was 25.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.6%-31.5%). The prevalence in those without the most important confounding factor, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), was 20.9% (95% CI, 16.5%-25.8%). Patients with RA had a prevalence of 42.9% (95% CI, 23.8%-63.1%). The difference between the non-RA and RA groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001, test of homogeneity, χ²). No geographical differences were noted (P = 0.20, test of homogeneity, χ²). Among those with HRVA, unilateral HRVA was present in 70.3% (95% CI, 65.2%-75.2%) and bilateral in 29.7% (95% CI, 24.8%-34.8%). No left or right side predilection was found (left, 50.8%; 95% CI, 33.8%-67.6%; right, 49.2%; 95% CI, 32.4%-66.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Craniocervical fusion should be preceded by examination of the vertebral arteries at the level of C2 because the presence of HRVAs is common and might preclude the safe insertion of transarticular or transpedicular screws.

3D-Customized Guiding Template for Posterior Fixation in Complex Atlantoaxial Instability-Preliminary Experiences of National Cheng Kung University Hospital

Objective  Atlantoaxial fixation is technically demanding and challenging, especially in cases with anatomical abnormality. The purpose of this study is to report the effectiveness of the three-dimensional (3D)-customized guiding template for placement of C1 and C2 screws in cases with abnormalities. Method  Two patients with anatomical abnormality and one without were included. The preoperative computed tomography (CT) image was analyzed using our software. The entry point, trajectory, and depth of the screws were designed based on these images. Templates with screw guiding cylinders and cervical spine model were created. In operation, guiding templates were applied directly to the laminae. Drilling, tapping, and screwing were performed through the cylinders. To evaluate the accuracy, deviation of the screw axis from the preplanned trajectory was measured on postoperative CT. A classification system was taking to evaluate the pedicle screw insertion. Results  In complex cases, one of C2 screws has grade 2 deviation, and two has grade 1. There was no deviation in screws of C1. All patients achieved symptoms free after 6 months follow-up. Conclusion  Although 3D-printed template for atlantoaxial fixation still has limitation in complex cases, it has been proved usefulness and makes the most difficult and dangerous spinal posterior fixation easy to achieve.

Posterior atlantoaxial fusion: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques and relevant vascular anomalies

Posterior atlantoaxial fusion is an important surgical technique frequently used to treat various pathologies involving the cervical 1-2 joint. Since the beginning of the 20th century, various fusion techniques have been developed with improved safety profile, higher fusion rates, and superior clinical outcome. Despite the advancement of technology and surgical techniques, posterior C1-2 fusion is still a technically challenging procedure given the complex bony and neurovascular anatomy in the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). In addition, vascular anomalies in this region are not uncommon and can lead to devastating neurovascular complications if unrecognized. Thus, it is important for spine surgeons to be familiar with various posterior atlantoaxial fusion techniques along with a thorough knowledge of various vascular anomalies in the CVJ. Intimate knowledge of the various surgical techniques in combination with an appreciation for anatomical variances, allows the surgeon develop a customized surgical plan tailored to each patient's particular pathology and individual anatomy. In this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of existing posterior C1-2 fusion techniques along with a review of common vascular anomalies in the CVJ.

[Rheumatoid instability in the cervical spine : Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies]

BACKGROUND

The involvement of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continues to be of clinical importance even in this age of biologics. Pathophysiological changes begin with an isolated atlantoaxial subluxation and may progress to a complex craniocervical and subaxial instability. The onset of cervical myelopathy can occur at any time and leads to a deterioration of the prognosis for the patient.

THERAPY

Treatment of the rheumatoid cervical spine should be aimed at improvement of the symptoms and prevention of further progress of the disease. In the case of instability, this is only possible by surgical treatment. The increasing usage of biological agents has led to a change in the clinical picture of the cervical involvement in RA patients. There are fewer patients presenting with isolated atlantoaxial instability. In contrast, the number of patients with complex craniocervical and/or subaxial instabilities is increasing. Complex cervical instabilities may require a longer fusion from the occiput to the upper thoracic spine. Modern operative techniques make this complex surgery also possible in severely disabled patients with a high comorbidity.

Surgicoanatomical aspect in vascular variations of the V3 segment of vertebral artery as a risk factor for C1 instrumentation

OBJECT

Awareness of vascular anomalies in V3 segment of vertebral artery (VA) is crucial to avoid iatrogenic injuries during surgical procedure. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of V3 segment vascular variations and demonstrate the importance of deciding the surgical strategy for C1 screw placement.

METHODS

Prevalence of vascular variations and morphometric measurements of the VA in the region of the craniocervical junction in 200 cases based on three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography (3D-CTA) scans were studied.

RESULTS

The VA has a variable course through C2 before it passes above its groove on the posterior arch of C1. Following the vascular variations of V3 segments of VA were persistent including first intersegmental artery (FIA), fenestration (FEN) of the VA, high-riding (HRVA and the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) branch originating from the C1/2 part of VA. HRVA was observed in 10.1% of patients, FIA in 1.8%, FEN in 1.3%, and PICA in 1.3%. One hundred and twenty-three (24.1%) patients were identified to have HRVA, 6% present on both sides.

CONCLUSION

The VA with FIA and FEN were rare in this study as many as a 10% the VA present over the starting point for C1 lateral screw. With respect to the vascular anatomy of V3 and more frequent left-sided VA dominancy, standard screw insertion should be started from the right side. Routine preoperative 3D-CTA evaluation is mandatory to prevent the VA injury when C1-C2 instrumentation is planned.

Differences in fixation strength among constructs of atlantoaxial fixation

OBJECTIVETo avoid jeopardizing an aberrant vertebral artery, there are three common options in placing a C2 screw, including pedicle, pars, and translaminar screws. Although biomechanical studies have demonstrated similar strength among these C2 screws in vitro, there are limited clinical data to address their differences in vivo. When different screws were placed in each side, few reports have compared the outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate these multiple combinations of C2 screws.METHODSConsecutive adult patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial (AA) fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Every patient uniformly had bilateral C1 lateral mass screws in conjunction with 2 C2 screws (1 C2 screw on each side chosen among the three options: pedicle, pars, or translaminar screws, based on individualized anatomical consideration). These patients were then grouped according to the different combinations of C2 screws for comparison of the outcomes.RESULTSA total of 63 patients were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 34.3 months. There were five kinds of construct combinations of the C2 screws: 2 pedicle screws (the Ped-Ped group, n = 24), 2 translaminar screws (the La-La group, n = 7), 2 pars screws (the Pars-Pars group, n = 6), 1 pedicle and 1 pars screw (the Ped-Pars group, n = 7), and 1 pedicle and 1 translaminar screw (the Ped-La group, n = 19). The rate of successful fixation in each of the groups was 100%, 57.1%, 100%, 100%, and 78.9% (Ped-Ped, La-La, Par-Par, Ped-Par, and Ped-La, respectively). The patients who had no translaminar screw had a higher rate of success than those who had 1 or 2 translaminar screws (100% vs 73.1%, p = 0.0009). Among the 5 kinds of construct combinations, 2 C2 pedicle screws (the Ped-Ped group) had higher rates of success than 1 C2 pedicle and 1 C2 translaminar screw (the Ped-La group, p = 0.018). Overall, the rate of successful fixation was 87.3% (55/63). There were 7 patients (4 in the Ped-La group and 3 in the La-La group) who lost fixation/reduction, and they all had at least 1 translaminar screw.CONCLUSIONSIn AA fixation, C2 pedicle or pars screws or a combination of both provided very high success rates. Involvement of 1 or 2 C2 translaminar screws in the construct significantly lowered success rates. Therefore, a C2 pars screw is recommended over a translaminar screw.

Late Subaxial Lesion after Overcorrected Occipitocervical Reconstruction in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Study Design

Retrospective case-control study, level 4.

Purpose

To clarify the risk factors for late subaxial lesion after occipitocervical (O-C) reconstruction. We examined cases requiring fusion-segment-extended (FE) reconstruction in addition to/after O-C reconstruction.

Overview of Literature

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently require O-C reconstruction surgery for cranio-cervical lesions. Acceptable outcomes are achieved via indirect decompression using cervical pedicle screws and occipital plate–rod systems. However, late subaxial lesions may develop occasionally following O-C reconstruction.

Methods

O-C reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and occipital plate–rod systems was performed between 1994 and 2007 in 113 patients with RA. Occipito-atlanto-axial (O-C2) reconstruction was performed for 89 patients, and occipito-subaxial cervical (O-under C2) reconstruction was performed for 24 patients. We reviewed the cases of patients requiring FE reconstruction (fusion extended group, FEG) and 26 consecutive patients who did not require FE reconstruction after a follow-up of >5 years (non-fusion extended group, NEG) as controls.

Results

FE reconstructions were performed for nine patients at an average of 45 months (range, 24–180 months) after O-C reconstruction. Of the 89 patients, three (3%) underwent FE reconstruction in cases of O-C2 reconstruction. Of the 24 patients, five (21%) underwent FE reconstruction in cases of O-under C2 reconstruction (p=0.003, Fisher exact test). Age, sex, RA type, and neurological impairment stage were not significantly different between FEG and NEG. O-under C2 reconstruction, larger correction angle (4° per number of unfixed segment), and O-C7 angle change after O-C reconstruction were the risk factors for late subaxial lesions on radiographic assessment.

Conclusions

Overcorrection of angle at fusion segments requiring O-C7 angle change was a risk factor for late subaxial lesion in patients with RA with fragile bones and joints. Correction should be limited, considering the residual mobility of the cervical unfixed segments.

Anatomical variations of vertebral artery and C2 isthmus in atlanto-axial fusion: Consecutive surgical 100 cases

VA anomalies in extra- and intraosseous regions of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is considered very carefully during the posterior screw fixation for the atlantoaxial instability (AAI). This study aims to compare the incidence and variations of VA anomalies, isthmus and pedicle size of C2 in 100 patients with AAI due to congenital skeletal anomaly (CSA) and acquired disease by using three-dimensional CT angiograms (3D CTA) before surgery. The CSA group contained 48 patients and the acquired disease group consisted of 52. In the CSA group, Os odontoideum was the major cause with 43 patients. The causes of acquired disease were RA in 16 patients and OA in 36 patients. Five patients had the anomalous VA in only CSA group; fenestration 2 patients and persistent first intersegmental (PFIS) artery 3 patients. Between CSA and acquired disease groups, no significant differences were found in the isthmus height, internal height, and pedicle width of C2 except the right internal height that is bigger in CSA group. The high-riding VA (isthmus height <4 mm or internal height <2 mm) had no significant difference between CSA group (27.1%) and acquired disease group (34.6%). However, in acquired disease group, patients with rheumatoid arthritis had smaller left internal height (4.21 ± 1.63 vs. 5.51 ± 1.83 mm) and pedicle width (4.11 ± 1.05 vs. 5.05 ± 1.66 mm) of C2 than those of patients with degenerative osteoarthritis. Therefore, in the case of atlantoaxial fusion, we should contemplate VA anomaly and the high-riding VA, especially in patients with CSA and RA.

Feasibility and outcome of stand-alone trans-articular screw fixation in atlantoaxial instability in children less than 8 years of age

PURPOSE

To study the feasibility and outcome of stand-alone trans-articular screw (TAS) fixation for atlantoaxial instability (AAI) in children less than 8 years of age.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted between 2009 and 2014. Thirteen children suffering from AAI were operated for a TAS fixation. Feasibility of TAS fixation was assessed on CT scan and a screw diameter was chosen based on C2 isthmus diameter. Demographic data collected included the etiology for AAI, age, and sex. Intra-operative data recorded was the duration of surgery, blood loss, vertebral artery injury or any adverse event. Radiological evaluation included pre- and post-operative atlantodens interval (ADI) and space available for cord (SAC) and fusion was evaluated at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean age of the final study group was 6.1 ± 1.5 years, with nine males and four females. Mean isthmus diameter on the left and right side was 3.3 ± 0.3 and 3.2 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. Five patients had an isthmus diameter of < 3.2 mm and a 2.7 mm Herbert screw was used in them and in nine patients, a CCS of 3.2 mm was used. Mean pre- and post-op ADI and SAC improved from 5.5 ± 0.8 to 3.1 ± 0.1 mm, respectively, and 9.8 ± 2.8 to 14 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. Fusion was seen in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stand-alone TAS with morselized allograft is safe, feasible and successful in managing AAI in children below 8 years of age. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Treatment of atlanto-axial subluxation secondary to rheumatoid arthritis by short segment stabilization with polyaxial screws

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this study was to analyse the compex clinical and radiographic findings in a group of RA patients with atlanto-axial slip (AAS) treated with free-hand short C1 lateral mass and C2 trans-pedicular screw fixation. The surgical technique used and the pathology treated were the same in all patients, producing a very homogeneous cohort of patients This allowed the study and measurement of radiographic parameters and fusion process.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (21 female, 8 male, mean age 54.9 years, duration of RA 17.3 years) with AAS and without CS were treated by short C1/2 fixation. Mean follow-up was 4.5 years. Pain intensity was monitored using VAS. Radiographic assessment consisted of lateral cervical radiographs in neutral and dynamic views, MR and CT of the cervical spine. The AADI, PADI, AAA, sub-axial cervical Cobb angle and canal-clivus angle (CCA) were measured pre-operatively and during the follow-up.

RESULTS

Significant malposition was recorded in 4 (3.4%) out of 116 inserted screws. AADI, PADI, AAA and CCA values changed significantly after surgery and remained stable during follow-up. The Cobb C angle value showed no significant change after surgery. There was a significant decrease of the VAS after the surgery. Fusion or a stable situation was achieved in all patients at 2-year follow-up. Pannus regression was observed in the vast majority of patients; only in two cases was rheumatic tissue detected on MR at 2 years post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

C1 lateral mass and C2 trans-pedicular fixation with polyaxial screws followed by an autograft between C1 and C2 lamina allowed, with an acceptable complication rate and favourable clinical results, adequate slip reposition, introduction of optimal sagittal alignment in terms of the final AAA with no radiographic consequences for the sub-axial cervical spine and assurance of long-term stability.

Spinal navigation for posterior instrumentation of C1-2 instability using a mobile intraoperative CT scanner

OBJECTIVE Spinal navigation techniques for surgical fixation of unstable C1-2 pathologies are challenged by complex osseous and neurovascular anatomy, instability of the pathology, and unreliable preoperative registration techniques. An intraoperative CT scanner with autoregistration of C-1 and C-2 promises sufficient accuracy of spinal navigation without the need for further registration procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy and reliability of posterior C1-2 fixation using intraoperative mobile CT scanner-guided navigation. METHODS In the period from July 2014 to February 2016, 10 consecutive patients with instability of C1-2 underwent posterior fixation using C-2 pedicle screws and C-1 lateral mass screws, and 2 patients underwent posterior fixation from C-1 to C-3. Spinal navigation was performed using intraoperative mobile CT. Following navigated screw insertion in C-1 and C-2, intraoperative CT was repeated to check for the accuracy of screw placement. In this study, the accuracy of screw positioning was retrospectively analyzed and graded by an independent observer. RESULTS The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of 10 females and 2 males, with a mean age of 80.7 ± 4.95 years (range 42-90 years). Unstable pathologies, which were verified by fracture dislocation or by flexion/extension radiographs, included 8 Anderson Type II fractures, 1 unstable Anderson Type III fracture, 1 hangman fracture Levine Effendi Ia, 1 complex hangman-Anderson Type III fracture, and 1 destructive rheumatoid arthritis of C1-2. In 4 patients, critical anatomy was observed: high-riding vertebral artery (3 patients) and arthritis-induced partial osseous destruction of the C-1 lateral mass (1 patient). A total of 48 navigated screws were placed. Correct screw positioning was observed in 47 screws (97.9%). Minor pedicle breach was observed in 1 screw (2.1%). No screw displacement occurred (accuracy rate 97.9%). CONCLUSION Spinal navigation using intraoperative mobile CT scanning was reliable and safe for posterior fixation in unstable C1-2 pathologies with high accuracy in this patient series.

Surgical Intervention for Instability of the Craniovertebral Junction

Surgical approaches for stabilizing the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) are classified as either anterior or posterior approaches. Among the anterior approaches, the established method is anterior odontoid screw fixation. Posterior approaches are classified as either atlanto-axial fixation or occipito-cervical (O-C) fixation. Spinal instrumentation using anchor screws and rods has become a popular method for posterior cervical fixation. Because this method achieves greater stability and higher success rates for fusion without the risk of sublaminar wiring, it has become a substitute for previous methods that used bone grafting and wiring. Several types of anchor screws are available, including C1/2 transarticular, C1 lateral mass, C2 pedicle, and translaminar screws. Appropriate anchor screws should be selected according to characteristics such as technical feasibility, safety, and strength. With these stronger anchor screws, shorter fixation has become possible. The present review discusses the current status of surgical interventions for stabilizing the CVJ.

A novel screw guiding method with a screw guide template system for posterior C-2 fixation

Object

Accurate insertion of C-2 cervical screws is imperative; however, the procedures for C-2 screw insertion are technically demanding and challenging, especially in cases of C-2 vertebral abnormality. The purpose of this study is to report the effectiveness of the tailor-made screw guide template (SGT) system for placement of C-2 screws, including in cases with abnormalities.

Methods

Twenty-three patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery with C-2 cervical screw insertion using the SGT system were included. The preoperative bone image on CT was analyzed using multiplanar imaging software. The trajectory and depth of the screws were designed based on these images, and transparent templates with screw guiding cylinders were created for each lamina. During the operation, after templates were engaged directly to the laminae, drilling, tapping, and screwing were performed through the templates. The authors placed 26 pedicle screws, 12 pars screws, 6 laminar screws, and 4 C1–2 transarticular screws using the SGT system. To assess the accuracy of the screw track under this system, the deviation of the screw axis from the preplanned trajectory was evaluated on postoperative CT and was classified as follows: Class 1 (accurate), a screw axis deviation less than 2 mm from the planned trajectory; Class 2 (inaccurate), 2 mm or more but less than 4 mm; and Class 3 (deviated), 4 mm or more. In addition, to assess the safety of the screw insertion, malpositioning of the screws was also evaluated using the following grading system: Grade 0 (containing), a screw is completely within the wall of the bone structure; Grade 1 (exposure), a screw perforates the wall of the bone structure but more than 50% of the screw diameter remains within the bone; Grade 2 (perforation), a screw perforates the bone structures and more than 50% of the screw diameter is outside the pedicle; and Grade 3 (penetration), a screw perforates completely outside the bone structure.

Results

In total, 47 (97.9%) of 48 screws were classified into Class 1 and Grade 0, whereas 1 laminar screw was classified as Class 3 and Grade 2. Mean screw deviations were 0.36 mm in the axial plane (range 0.0–3.8 mm) and 0.30 mm in the sagittal plane (range 0.0–0.8 mm).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the SGT system provided extremely accurate C-2 cervical screw insertion without configuration of reference points, high-dose radiation from intraoperative 3D navigation, or any registration or probing error evoked by changes in spinal alignment during surgery. A multistep screw placement technique and reliable screw guide cylinders were the key to accurate screw placement using the SGT system.

Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1-C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

To our knowledge, no large series comparing the risk of vertebral artery injury by C1-C2 transarticular screw versus C2 pedicle screw have been published. In addition, no comparative studies have been performed on those with a high-riding vertebral artery and/or a narrow pedicle who are thought to be at higher risk than those with normal anatomy.

PURPOSE

To compare the risk of vertebral artery injury by C1-C2 transarticular screw versus C2 pedicle screw in an overall patient population and subsets of patients with a high-riding vertebral artery and a narrow pedicle using computed tomography (CT) scan images and three-dimensional (3D) screw trajectory software.

STUDY DESIGN

Radiographic analysis using CT scans.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Computed tomography scans of 269 consecutive patients, for a total of 538 potential screw insertion sites for each type of screw.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cortical perforation into the vertebral artery groove of C2 by a screw.

METHODS

We simulated the placement of 4.0 mm transarticular and pedicle screws using 1-mm-sliced CT scans and 3D screw trajectory software. We then compared the frequency of C2 vertebral artery groove violation by the two different fixation methods. This was done in the overall patient population, in the subset of those with a high-riding vertebral artery (defined as an isthmus height ≤ 5 mm or internal height ≤ 2 mm on sagittal images) and with a narrow pedicle (defined as a pedicle width ≤ 4 mm on axial images).

RESULTS

There were 78 high-riding vertebral arteries (14.5%) and 51 narrow pedicles (9.5%). Most (82%) of the narrow pedicles had a concurrent high-riding vertebral artery, whereas only 54% of the high-riding vertebral arteries had a concurrent narrow pedicle. Overall, 9.5% of transarticular and 8.0% of pedicle screws violated the C2 vertebral artery groove without a significant difference between the two types of screws (p=.17). Among those with a high-riding vertebral artery, vertebral artery groove violation was significantly lower (p=.02) with pedicle (49%) than with transarticular (63%) screws. Among those with a narrow pedicle, vertebral artery groove violation was high in both groups (71% with transarticular and 76% with pedicle screws) but without a significant difference between the two groups (p=.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, neither technique has more inherent anatomic risk of vertebral artery injury. However, in the presence of a high-riding vertebral artery, placement of a pedicle screw is significantly safer than the placement of a transarticular screw. Narrow pedicles, which might be anticipated to lead to higher risk for a pedicle screw than a transarticular screw, did not result in a significant difference because most patients (82%) with narrow pedicles had a concurrent high-riding vertebral artery that also increased the risk with a transarticular screw. Except in case of a high-riding vertebral artery, our results suggest that the surgeon can opt for either technique and expect similar anatomic risks of vertebral artery injury.

Cervical spine instability in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory disease of the cervical spine (CS). After hands and feet, CS is the most commonly involved segment, being present in more than half of the patients with RA. Especially in the CS, RA may cause degeneration of ligaments, leading to laxity, instability and subluxation of the vertebral bodies. This is often asymptomatic or symptoms are erroneously attributed to peripheral manifestations. Otherwise, this may cause compression of spinal cord (SC) and medulla oblongata leading to severe neurologic deficits and even sudden death. Owing to its potentially debilitating and life-threatening sequelae, inevitable progression once neurologic deficits occur and the poor medical condition of afflicted patients, CS involvement remains a priority in the diagnosis and its treatment will remain a challenge. The surgical approach aims a solid fixation of the upper cervical spine, giving stability, preventing neurologic deterioration and injury to the SC, leading to improved neurologic function, vascular integrity and maintenance of sagittal balance. The recent advances in surgical techniques, complete understanding of the anatomy and precise preoperative evaluation led to safer and more effective procedures that have decreased complication rates. Based on the fact that when a patient becomes myelopathic the rate of long-term mortality increases and the chance of neurologic recovery decreases, many authors agree that early surgical intervention, before the onset of neurologic deficits, gives a more satisfactory outcome. However, the timing when a prophylactic stabilization should occur is poorly defined, and so, patients with radiographic instability but without evidence of neurologic deficit are still the most difficult to manage.

Posterior cervical fixation with a nitinol shape memory loop for primary surgical stabilization of atlantoaxial instability: a preliminary report

Objective

To evaluate a new posterior atlantoaxial fixation technique using a nitinol shape memory loop as a simple method that avoids the risk of vertebral artery or nerve injury.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 14 patients with atlantoaxial instability who had undergone posterior C1-2 fusion using a nitinol shape memory loop. The success of fusion was determined clinically and radiologically. We reviewed patients' neurologic outcomes, neck disability index (NDI), solid bone fusion on cervical spine films, changes in posterior atlantodental interval (PADI), and surgical complications.

Results

Solid bone fusion was documented radiologically in all cases, and PADI increased after surgery (p<0.05). All patients remained neurologically intact and showed improvement in NDI score (p<0.05). There were no surgical complications such as neural tissue or vertebral artery injury or instrument failure in the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Posterior C1-2 fixation with a nitinol shape memory loop is a simple, less technically demanding method compared to the conventional technique and may avoid the instrument-related complications of posterior C1-2 screw and rod fixation. We introduce this technique as one of the treatment options for atlantoaxial instability.

Transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability - modified Magerl's technique in 38 patients

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic atlantoaxial instability needs stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint. Among the various techniques described in literature for the fixation of atlantoaxial joint, Magerl's technique of transarticular screw fixation remains the gold standard. Traditionally this technique combines placement of transarticular screws and posterior wiring construct. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes in subjects of atlantoaxial instability who were operated using transarticular screws and iliac crest bone graft, without the use of sublaminar wiring (a modification of Magerl's technique).

METHODS

We evaluated retrospectively 38 subjects with atlantoaxial instability who were operated at our institute using transarticular screw fixation. The subjects were followed up for pain, fusion rates, neurological status and radiographic outcomes. Final outcome was graded both subjectively and objectively, using the scoring system given by Grob et al.

RESULTS

Instability in 34 subjects was secondary to trauma, in 3 due to rheumatoid arthritis and 1 had tuberculosis. Neurological deficit was present in 17 subjects. Most common presenting symptom was neck pain, present in 35 of the 38 subjects.Postoperatively residual neck and occipital pain was present in 8 subjects. Neurological deficit persisted in only 7 subjects. Vertebral artery injury was seen in 3 subjects. None of these subjects had any sign of neurological deficit or vertebral insufficiency. Three cases had nonunion. At the latest follow up, subjectively, 24 subjects had good result, 6 had fair and 8 had bad result. On objective grading, 24 had good result, 11 had fair and 3 had bad result. The mean follow up duration was 41 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Transarticular screw fixation is an excellent technique for fusion of the atlantoaxial complex. It provides highest fusion rates, and is particularly important in subjects at risk for nonunion. Omitting the posterior wiring construct that has been used along with the bone graft in the traditional Magerl' s technique achieves equally good fusion rates and is an important modification, thereby avoiding the complications of sublaminar wire passage.

Modification of Wright's technique for C2 translaminar screw fixation: technical note

PURPOSE

To describe a modification of Wright's technique for C2 translaminar screw fixation.

METHODS

Bilateral crossing C2 laminar screws have recently become popular as an alternative technique for C2 fixation. This technique is particularly useful in patients with anomalous anatomy, as a salvage technique where other modes of fixation have failed or as a primary procedure. However, reported disadvantages of this technique include breach of the dorsal lamina and spinal canal, early hardware failure and difficulty in bone graft placement due to the position of the polyaxial screw heads. To address some of these issues, a modified technique was used in six patients. In this technique, the upper part of the spinous process of C2 was removed and the entry point of the screw was in the base of this removed spinous process.

RESULTS

The screw position was satisfactory in all patients. There were no intraoperative or early postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modification enables placement of a bone graft on the C2 lamina and is also less likely to cause inadvertent cortical breach. Because of these advantages, it is especially suitable for patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis with destruction of the lateral masses of C2 or as part of a hybrid construct in patients with a unilateral high-riding vertebral artery. This technique is not suitable for bilateral translaminar screw placement.