Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis

A 10-year perspective on the question of whether surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are "one and done"?

PURPOSE

Posterior scoliosis fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is considered a highly successful surgery with excellent outcomes. However, especially as many patients "graduate" from their pediatric surgeons, there is the need to quantify the long-term outcomes of such surgeries.

METHODS

The 2010-2022 Pearldiver M161 dataset was queried for those who were 10 to 18 years old with AIS undergoing PSF with at least 10 years follow-up. Patient characteristics were abstracted. Reoperations were identified based on coding for any subsequent thoracic/lumbar surgery/revision. The 10-year reoperation rate and reasons for reoperation were determined, and multivariate regression was performed to determine risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 3,373 AIS PSF patients were identified. Of the study cohort, 324 (9.6%) underwent reoperation within 10-years with an interquartile range for timing of surgery of 81-658 days, of which 29.6% were done for infection. Reoperations were done within the first three months for 152 (46.9% of reoperations), three months to 2 years for 97 (29.9%), and 2 years to 10 years for 74 (22.8%). Based on multivariate regression, need for reoperation was associated with male sex (OR: 1.70), asthma (OR: 1.36) and greater than thirteen segments of instrumentation (OR: 1.48) (p < 0.05 for each) but not age, other comorbidities, or insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study of a large national AIS PSF population found 9.6% to undergo reoperation in the 10 years following their index operation. Although specifics about the curve pattern could not be determined, the reoperation incidence and correlation with specific risk factors are notable and important for patient counselling.

Costs of revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis following thoracic posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To assess direct costs and risks associated with revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis/failure (DJK) following thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusions (TPSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

Children who underwent TPSF for AIS by a single surgeon (2014-2020) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were minimum follow-up of 2 years, thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusion with a lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) cranial to L2. Patients who developed DJK requiring revision operations were identified and compared with those who did not develop DJK.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine children were included for analysis. Of these, 6.3% developed DJK. Average time to revision was 20.8 ± 16.2 months. Comparing index operations, children who developed DJK had significantly greater BMIs, significantly lower thoracic kyphosis postoperatively, greater post-operative lumbar Cobb angles, and significantly more LIVs cranial to the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), despite having statistically similar pre-operative coronal and sagittal alignment parameters and operative details compared with non-DJK patients. Revision operations for DJK, when compared with index operations, involved significantly fewer levels, longer operative times, greater blood loss, and longer hospital lengths of stay. These factors resulted in significantly greater direct costs for revision operations for DJK ($76,883 v. $46,595; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center experience, risk factors for development of DJK were greater BMI, lower post-operative thoracic kyphosis, and LIV cranial to SSV. As revision operations for DJK were significantly more costly than index operations, all efforts should be aimed at strategies to prevent DJK in the AIS population.

Revision of Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Reasons, Treatments, and Clinical Management with Case Examples

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a curvature of the spine that develops in children ages 10-18 and can be attributed to unknown causes. The Lenke AIS classification system provides a template to classify these deformities by curve type paired with recommended operative treatments. Treatment of this patient population has been associated with low complication rates and overall surgical success. Nonetheless, a fraction of patients remain susceptible to revision surgery. This manuscript will focus on the aspects of AIS surgery, highlighting case examples, the different treatment approaches, complication rates, and primary reasons for revision surgery and associated outcomes.

Revision Surgery After Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Aanalysis of a Large Cohort of Cases.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the rate and cause of revision surgery after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS).

METHODS

The patients diagnosed with AIS who underwent spinal fusion surgery in a single center from 2002 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were followed up at least 2 years. The causes of revision surgery were analyzed and the incidence of revision surgery was counted.

RESULTS

A total of 1816 AIS patients were included in the study. After an average of 8.5 years (range 3-18 years) follow-up, a total of 51 patients underwent 54 revision operations. The overall revision rate is 2.8%. The revision rate of combined approach (anterior and posterior) and anterior approach was 6.6% (8/122), and the revision rate of posterior approach was 2.5% (43/1694). The most common causes of revision were malposition of implants/implants failure (37%), followed by poor wound healing/ infection (23%). Spinal decompensation, adding on and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) accounted for 20%. The compensatory curve continued to worsen after selective fusion accounted for 14% and finally the discomfort with the implants accounted for 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall revision rate of spinal fusion for AIS is 2.8%. The implants and incision problems were the most common causes of revision surgeries.

Repeat surgical interventions following "definitive" instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: a 30-year update

PURPOSE

Although spinal fusion (SF) is considered "definitive" treatment in juvenile/adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (JIS/AIS), complications requiring reoperation continue to occur. The purpose of this study was to characterize the evolving rates of reoperation following SF in JIS/AIS.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective review of patients who underwent SF for JIS/AIS as their index surgical treatment between 2013 and 2019. Patient data were collected to identify complications requiring reoperation and factors associated with reoperation. Complication rates from 2013 to 2019 were compared to patients from 1988 to 2012 at the same institution.

RESULTS

This study analyzed 934 patients (81.7% female, mean age at surgery 14.5 ± 2.1). Thirty-eight patients (4.1%) required a total of 47 reoperations, a > 50% decrease in overall complication rate from the 2008-2012 population (4.1% vs 9.6%, respectively, p < 0.001). The decrease stemmed mainly from decreases in rates of infection (1.1% vs 4.1%, p < 0.001) and symptomatic implants (0.4% vs 2.1%, p = 0.004). There were, however, non-significant increases in implant failures (0.6% vs 0.2%, p = 0.4367) and pseudoarthrosis (1.0% vs 0.4%, p = 0.5202). Both of these complications were associated with patients with a higher mean weight (implant failure: 70.4 kg ± 21.1 vs 56.1 kg ± 14.9, p = 0.002; pseudoarthrosis: 85.8 kg ± 27.9 vs 55.9 ± 14.5, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation following SF for JIS/AIS has decreased over the past 7 years when compared to 25 years of historical controls. The changing landscape of reoperation demands further research into the risk factors for those reoperations that have become more common.

Risk factors for distal junctional kyphosis after posterior spinal surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis

Introduction

Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) is a serious complication after posterior spinal surgery in managing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Our study aims to investigate the predictors of DJK in AIS patients.

Methods

We searched the English databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for clinical research studies on AIS. To identify the risk factors for DJK, we collected demographic data, such as age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), and sagittal parameters, including preoperative pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), distal junctional angle (DJA), lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) relative to sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), and postoperative DJA. Data were analyzed by RevMan (5.3 version) and STATA (12.0 version).

Results

Finally, six included articles (1,240 patients) showed 9% (98 of 1,240 patients) of patients suffering from DJK. Our findings indicated that preoperative TK [p = 0.007, OR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.10, 0.61)], TLK [p < 0.0001, OR = 5.99, 95% CI (3.33, 8.65)], and postoperative DJA [p = 0.002, OR = 0.56, 95% CI (0.21, 0.91)] in the DJK group were markedly higher than those in the non-DJK group. Moreover, patients with LIV above SSV [p < 0.0001, OR = 7.95, 95% CI (4.16, 15.22)] were more likely to develop DJK. No discernible difference was found in age, sex, BMI, preoperative PT, SVA, LL, or DJA between the two groups.

Conclusions

Regarding the AIS patients, factors such as higher preoperative TK and TLK, higher postoperative DJA, and LIV above the SSV were related to an increased rate of DJK.

Efficiency of repeated corrective surgery in patients with spinal deformities: analysis of the immediate results of a monocenter cohort and a brief review of the literature

Objective. To analyze the results of repeated corrective surgery in patients with spinal deformities of various etiologies.

Material and Methods. The study group included 87 patients (mean age is 22.8 years, m : f = 10 : 77) who underwent repeated deformity correction using third-generation instrumentation (CDI and its analogues), and were selected from 144 patients previously operated on for spinal deformities of various etiologies using different types of spinal instrumentation. The magnitude of scoliotic deformity, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, rotation of the apical vertebra, the volume of intraoperative blood loss, and the duration of the operation were assessed. All patients answered the questions of the SRS-24 questionnaire at the stages of treatment and postoperative follow-up, and were also examined by computer optical topography method.

Results. Out of 87 reoperated patients, 74 had idiopathic scoliosis. In 31 patients, the results were evaluated within a period of at least 2 years (average 61.8 months). As a result of the intervention, the primary curve was corrected by 29.1° (36.5 %). Loss of correction was 4.6° (p < 0.001), derotation of the apical vertebra – from 34.9° to 22.1° (p < 0.001) and loss of correction – 0.8°. The average blood loss varied from 810 to 1138 ml, and the operation time – from 187 to 289 min. Computer optical topography data convincingly confirmed the corrective effect achieved during the repeated intervention. According to the questionnaire (SRS-24), satisfaction with the results of the operation was quite high.

Conclusion. Repeated corrective interventions in patients with spinal deformities of various etiologies, even in long-term periods, can partially restore the lost primary correction and improve the quality of life of patients, which is confirmed by clinical and radiographic data, the results of computer optical topography and the SRS-24 questionnaire.

Bovine-derived xenograft is a viable bone graft substitute in multilevel, instrumented, spinal fusion

Objective

To evaluate radiological outcomes following the use of xenogeneic bone graft substitute (BGS) in patients undergoing multisegmental spinal fusion.

Summery of Background Data

Data exists for single level and short segment fusions, there presently is a paucity of data on fusion rate after bone augmentation with BGS in multisegmental posterior spinal fusion (PSF). The leading concern is pseudarthrosis, which often leads to a loss of correction after PSF. Therefore, the bone graft is an essential aspect of PSF.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed the radiological data of a consecutive cohort of patients who had been treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) via multisegmental spinal fusion, in whom a bovine derived BGS had been used and had a complete dataset of 24 months follow-up. The Cobb angle of the main curve was measured pre-operatively and then at 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Loosening of the screws was recorded at the same post-operative time points.

Results

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 patients were included. We found no significant change of the cobb angle from the main curve as well as the cobb angle from the thoracic kyphosis during the 24 months of follow up. No patient showed a lack of bony fusion. There was 1 revision surgery, which was due to trauma.

Conclusion

In this cohort, all patients showed successful bone fusion during a 24-month follow-up. Additionally, there was no change in the Cobb angle during the 2-year post-operative period. Our data indicates that the use of bovine-derived BGS supports bone fusion after multisegmental posterior instrumented fusion of the spine.

A Two-Surgeon Approach Improves Performance for Young Surgeons in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a complex 3-dimensional deformity. Previous studies have suggested a learning curve in the successful execution of this technically demanding procedure. A 2-surgeon model may be helpful for less experienced surgeons by facilitating greater consistency in surgical metrics. The objective of this study was to show no significant difference in the parameters examined for surgeries done by inexperienced primary surgeons with a 2-surgeon model compared with those done by their more experienced cohorts. All surgeries with a primary diagnosis of AIS that were performed from January 2012 to December 2015 and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up were included for analysis. Three groups were created based on surgeon experience: inexperienced surgeons (IS) group, experienced surgeons (ES) group, and a third group where the primary surgeon was in the experienced group and the assistant surgeon was in the inexperienced group (EIS). Variables included for analysis were age, Lenke classification, number of levels fused, length of surgery, length of stay, percent curve correction, ratio of estimated blood loss to levels fused, surgical blood loss, and complications. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, number of levels fused, lower estimated blood loss ratio to the number of levels fused, or percent curve correction (P>.05). The IS group was found to have a significant shorter length of stay (P=.004). The 2-surgeon model is an effective tool for inexperienced surgeons to achieve consistent and reproducible operative performance that is comparable with their more experienced peers. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e347-e352.].

Incidence and Risk Factors for Unplanned Return to the Operating Room Following Primary Definitive Fusion for Pediatric Spinal Deformity: A Multicenter Study with Minimum 2-year Follow-Up

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors for UPROR within minimum 2-year follow-up in primary definitive fusion for pediatric spinal deformity.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several previous reports have elucidated the incidence of complications after pediatric scoliosis surgery; however, there has been no study that described the incidence and risk factors for unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) with long-term follow-up in surgery for pediatric scoliosis with every etiology.

METHODS

We retrospectively extracted data of patients aged <19 years, from 14 institutes in Japan, who underwent primary definitive fusion surgery for spinal deformity between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcomes were the incidence of UPROR within the minimum 2-year follow-up period for any reason. Univariate and multivariate logistical analyses were conducted to identify potential risk factors associated with UPROR.

RESULTS

We identified 1417 eligible patients (287 males and 1130 females) with a mean age of 13.9 years. UPROR for any reason within minimum 2-year follow-up was identified in 68 patients (4.8%). The most frequent cause for UPROR was implant failure found in 29 patients, followed by surgical site infection in 14 patients, junctional problems in 10 patients, and neurological complications in six patients. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a diagnosis of kyphosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-6.04), etiology of congenital or structural type (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.08-4.53), etiology of syndromic type (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.27-5.64), and increased operation time of ≥300 minutes (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.07-3.07) were the risk factors for the incidence of UPROR.

CONCLUSION

The present multicenter study identified for the first time the incidence and risk factors for UPROR with minimum 2-year follow-up after primary definitive fusion surgery for pediatric spinal deformity with every etiology.Level of Evidence: 3.

Revision risk after pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a nationwide study with 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Revision risk after pediatric spine surgery is not well established and varies between deformity etiologies.

PURPOSE

To report the 2-year revision risk following surgery for primary pediatric spinal deformity in a nationwide cohort and to evaluate potential risk factors and reasons for revision surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective nationwide cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A national registry study of all pediatric spinal deformity patients undergoing surgery during 2006-2015 (n=1310).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Two-year revision risk.

METHODS

All patients ≤21 years of age undergoing spinal deformity surgery in Denmark during 2006-2015 were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Data on revision surgery were retrieved from the DNPR. Patients were categorized in six groups according to etiology. Medical records were reviewed for reason for revision in all patients. Potential risk factors for revision were assessed with multiple logistic regression analyses and included age, etiology, sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and growth-preserving treatment.

RESULTS

Patients were categorized according to etiology: idiopathic deformity (53%), neuromuscular deformity (23%), congenital/structural deformity (9%), spondylolisthesis (7%), Scheuermann's kyphosis (5%), and syndromic deformity (3%). Of 1,310 included patients, 9.2% underwent revision surgery within 2 years and 1.5% was revised more than once. Median time to revision was 203 (interquartile range 35-485) days. The multivariable logistic regression found significantly higher odds ratio (OR) for revision in patients with growth-preserving treatment (OR=5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-10.1), congenital deformity (OR=2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.3), spondylolisthesis (OR=3.5, 95% CI 1.9-6.7), Scheuermann kyphosis (OR=3.9, 95% CI 1.9-8.3), and CCI score ≥3 (OR=2.5 95% CI 1.1-5.6). The most common reason for revision was implant failure (32.5%) followed by residual deformity and/or curve progression (15.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide study, the 2-year revision risk after primary pediatric spinal deformity surgery is 9.2%. Risk factors for revision are etiology of congenital deformity, spondylolisthesis, Scheuermann kyphosis as well as patients with growth-preserving treatment and higher CCI. The most common reason for revision is implant failure.

Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To report radiographic and functional outcomes, with an average follow-up of 20 years, of adolescents treated surgically for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis by hybrid construct using only pedicular screws for the distal fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients. Radiographic data were evaluated on fullspine radiographs (Cobb angle, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis). Clinical data were evaluated with ODI, SF-12, SRS-30 and Analog Pain Scale. Disc height and listhesis below the arthrodesis were measured.

RESULTS

We analyzed 90 women and 19 men with a mean age of 16.9 y.o. at surgery. Radiographic data were assessed for 46 patients after 17.4 years. Mean preoperative Cobb angle was 58°, mean correction 40.1% with 5.3° of loss at final FU. Lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis increased significantly at last FU. Degenerative changes below the arthrodesis were reported in 5 cases. Clinical data were assessed for 42 patients after 19.9 years: SRS-30 3.8; ODI 12.3%; SF-12 PCS 48.6 and MCS 46. Low back pain was reported in 69% of cases with low intensity (3.1). The lowest instrumented vertebrae did not influence significantly the functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The correction of thoracic AIS with lumbar or thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation provides good radiological and clinical outcomes at very long term. The reduction in the coronal plane is stable; the HRQoL is quite as good as the general population. The degenerative evolution below remain relatively rare, therefore global sagittal balance is not modified.

Surgeon volume affects short- and long-term surgical outcomes in idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) Inpatient Database.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the differences in short- and long-term complications, following long-segment pediatric spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis surgery, between surgeons with low versus high annual surgical volume. Spinal deformity surgery is complex and requires significant training and repetition to master. Surgeon and hospital volume have been shown to correlate with outcomes following cervical and lumbar spine surgery. However, there is limited literature regarding the impact of surgeon volume on long-term outcomes following pediatric idiopathic spinal deformity correction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of the SPARCS inpatient database from 2004 to 2013 of pediatric patients who underwent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Surgeons were stratified into high (> 15 cases/year)- and low (≤ 15 cases/year)-volume cohorts by aggregating all cases completed over the study period until 50% of the total cases were captured above and below an average case per-year threshold. This threshold occurred at 15 cases/year. Short-term and long-term readmission and medical/surgical complications were collected. Multivariate logistic regression models assessed the risk of short- and long-term complications between cohorts.

RESULTS

3910 pediatric patients underwent a primary arthrodesis from a total of 223 surgeons. More high-volume surgeons operated at academic teaching hospitals (p < 0.001), used a combined AP surgical approach (p < 0.001), and fewer utilized rhBMP (p < 0.001). High-volume surgeons had shorter lengths of stay (p < 0.001). Low-volume surgeons had increased odds of inpatient surgical complications (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.00-2.45). Low-volume surgeons had increased odds of revision at 5 and 10 years (5 years. OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05-2.31; 10 years. OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.09-2.31). Low-volume surgeons had increased odds of implant malfunction at 10 years (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.15-2.86).

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume surgeons had decreased odds of short- and long-term complications compared to low volume when performing primary spinal arthrodesis in idiopathic scoliosis. Low-volume surgeons experienced significantly greater odds of inpatient surgical complications, as well as increased risk of revision during long-term follow-up with a significantly increased risk of implant malfunction at 10 years post-operatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Complications

Despite the fact that spinal surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) result in good outcomes for most patients, they are not without complications either medically or surgically. Neurologic injury represents the most severe complication and is, as such, the most feared. Further complications include dural tears, peripheral neuropathy, surgical-site infections, implant-related issues, thromboembolic events, visual loss, pseudarthrosis, Crankshaft phenomenon, flatback phenomenon, proximal junctional kyphosis, and mortality. It is vital that all spine surgeons to be fully conversant with the possible complications and the proper responses for each of them.

•

Surgeons should know how to manage complications of surgery for AIS.

•

Patients should know about potential complications prior to surgery.

•

Neurologic injury represents the most severe complication.

Secondary Surgery Rates After Primary Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Instrumented spinal fusion is the gold standard treatment for surgical magnitude adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), with the goal being stable fusion without the need for additional procedures. The purpose of this study was to define the surgical return rates of AIS at a single center with respect to various instrumentation constructs used during initial spinal fusion. A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with AIS who underwent instrumented fusion with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Demographic information, implant type, and surgical approach for the primary surgery and all subsequent secondary operations were recorded. Four hundred eleven patients who underwent instrumented fusion for AIS during the study period met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six secondary operations were performed in 50 patients (12.2%). Symptomatic hardware, pseudarthrosis, and infection were the most common indications for secondary surgery. Posterior pedicle screw constructs had a lower secondary surgery rate (5.8%) compared with hybrid and combined fusions (P<.05). The all hook, hybrid, anterior only, and combined fusions had secondary surgery rates of 13.0%, 18.5%, 10.0%, and 20.8%, respectively, which were not statistically different. When specifically comparing pedicle screw with hook constructs, there was a statistically lower pseudarthrosis rate (P=.03) favoring pedicle screw instrumentation. Patients undergoing instrumented fusion for AIS are at some risk for subsequent surgery. To lessen that risk, pedicle screw constructs should be considered, as they have shown an overall lower secondary surgery rate and in particular a lower rate of pseudarthrosis. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):235-239.].

Cost-Utility Analysis of Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Cost-utility analysis OBJECTIVE.: To compare the cost utility of operative versus nonoperative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and identity factors that influence cost-utility estimates.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

AIS affects 1% to 3% of children aged 10 to 16 years. When the major coronal curve reaches 50°, operative treatment may be considered. The cost utility of operative treatment of AIS is unknown.

METHODS

A decision-analysis model comparing operative versus nonoperative treatment was developed for a hypothetical 15-year-old skeletally mature girl with a 55° right thoracic (Lenke 1) curve. The AIS literature was reviewed to estimate the probability, health utility, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each event. For the conservative model, we assumed that operative treatment did not result directly in any QALYs gained, and the health utility in AIS patients was the same as the age-matched US population mean. Costs were inflation-adjusted at 3.22% per year to 2015 US dollars. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using mixed first-order and second-order Monte Carlo simulations. Incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) and incremental net monetary benefit were calculated. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed by varying cost, probability, and QALY estimates.

RESULTS

Operative treatment was favored in 98.5% of simulations, with a median ICUR of $20,600/QALY (95% confidence interval, $20,500-$21,900) below the societal willingness-to-pay threshold (WTPT) of $50,000/QALY. The median incremental net monetary benefit associated with operative treatment was $15,100 (95% confidence interval, $14,800-$15,700). Operative treatment produced net monetary benefit across various WTPTs. Factors that most affected the ICUR were net costs associated with uncomplicated operative treatment, undergoing surgery during adulthood, and development of pulmonary complications.

CONCLUSION

Cost-utility analysis suggests that operative treatment of AIS is favored over nonoperative treatment and falls below the $50,000/QALY WTPT for patients with Lenke 1 curves.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Preclinical Bench Testing on a Novel Posterior Dynamic Deformity Correction Device for Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical test.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the preclinical tests performed to assess the durability of a novel fusionless dynamic device for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The minimal invasive deformity correction (MID-C) system is a distractible posterior dynamic deformity correction device designed to reduce scoliosis for AIS patients, to maintain curve correction, and to preserve spinal motion. To overcome the challenges of wear and fatigue of this procedure, the system has two unique features: polyaxial joints at the rod-screw interface and a ceramic coating of the moving parts.

METHODS

Five biomechanical tests were performed: Static compression to failure, fatigue loading per ASTM F 1717 with 5.5-mm screws for 10 million cycles (MC) at 5 Hz, wear assessment, wear test of the polyaxial joint under 100 N load for 10 MC, and wear particle implantation in rabbits.

RESULTS

The system failed through buckling of the rod with loads over 3000 N (400% of human body weight). Dynamically, the system maintained 700 N for 10 MC with 5.5 mm screws. The maximum total steady-state wear rate was 0.074 mg/MC (0.03 per polyaxial joint and 0.014 mg/MC for the ratchet mechanism). Histologic evaluation of the particle injection sites indicated no difference in the local tissue response between the control and test articles. At 3 and 6 months postinjection, there were neither adverse local effects nor systemic effects observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique design features of the MID-C system, based on polyaxial joints and ceramic coating, resulted in favorable static, fatigue, and wear resistance properties. Wear properties were superior to those published for artificial spinal discs. Long-term outcomes from clinical use will be required to correlate these bench tests to the in vivo reality of clinical use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. This study aims to characterize pseudarthrosis after long-segment fusion in spinal deformity by identifying incidence rates by etiology, risk factors for its development, and common features. Pseudarthrosis can be a painful and debilitating complication of spinal fusion that may require reoperation. It is poorly characterized in the setting of spinal deformity. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical research including spinal deformity patients treated with long-segment fusions reporting pseudarthrosis as a complication. Meta-analysis was performed on etiologic subsets of the studies to calculate incidence rates for pseudarthrosis. Qualitative synthesis was performed to identify characteristics of and risk factors for pseudarthrosis. The review found 162 articles reporting outcomes for 16,938 patients which met inclusion criteria. In general, the included studies were of medium to low quality according to recommended reporting standards and study design. Meta-analysis calculated an incidence of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-1.8%) for pseudarthrosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 2.2% (95% CI 1.3-3.2%) in neuromuscular scoliosis, and 6.3% (95% CI 4.3-8.2%) in adult spinal deformity. Risk factors for pseudarthrosis include age over 55, construct length greater than 12 segments, smoking, thoracolumbar kyphosis greater than 20°, and fusion to the sacrum. Choice of graft material, pre-operative coronal alignment, post-operative analgesics, and sex have no significant impact on fusion rates. Older patients with greater deformity requiring more extensive instrumentation are at higher risk for pseudarthrosis. Overall incidence of pseudarthrosis requiring reoperation is low in adult populations and very low in adolescent populations.

Preventing Distal Junctional Kyphosis by Applying the Stable Sagittal Vertebra Concept to Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of using the stable sagittal vertebra (SSV) for selecting the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) to prevent distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in selective thoracic fusions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cho et al. reported that including the SSV in a fusion decreased the rate of DJK in thoracic hyperkyphosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients from two pediatric hospitals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent selective posterior thoracic fusion with the LIV at L2 or above from 2000 to 2012. Patients with less than 2 years' follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome measure was DJK, defined radiographically as ≥10° between the superior end plate of the LIV and the inferior end plate of the vertebra below on a standing lateral radiograph. We investigated the SSV, which was defined as the vertebral level at which 50% of the vertebral body was in front of the posterior sacral vertical line (PSVL) on a standing lateral radiograph. This particular definition was referred to as SSV.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 14.4 years. Mean Cobb angle was 58°. The overall rate of DJK was 7% (8/113). When the LIV was superior to SSV, the rate of DJK was 17% (8/46) versus 0% (0/67) when the LIV was at or inferior to SSV (p=.01). The rates of DJK for patients with the LIV one, two, and three levels above SSV were 17% (4/24), 7% (1/14), and 43% (3/7), respectively. There was no significant association between preoperative or postoperative maximum kyphosis, thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, pelvic incidence, sagittal balance or coronal balance, and development of DJK.

CONCLUSION

Although LIV selection is complex, choosing the LIV at or below the SSV is a simple rule that minimizes the risk of DJK.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

5-Year Reoperation Risk and Causes for Revision After Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

An actuarial "survivorship" analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to define the incidence and cause of surgical revision 5 years after scoliosis surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Data on contemporary revision surgery rates after idiopathic scoliosis surgery beyond the 2 years postoperatively in the adolescent and young adult population are limited.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, idiopathic scoliosis surgical registry from 1995 to 2009 were reviewed. Any spine reoperation was defined as a "terminal event." An actuarial survivorship analysis that adjusts for patients lost to follow-up was performed to determine cumulative survival. Time intervals were defined as 0 to <3 months, 3 months to <1 year, 1 to <2 years, 2 to <5 years, and 5 to 10 years. Registry data and radiographs were reviewed and five categories for reoperation assigned: 1) implant failure and/or pseudarthrosis, 2) implant misplacement and/or prominence, 3) wound complication and/or infection, 4) residual deformity and/or progression, and 5) other.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred thirty-five patients from 12 sites were included. The majority were female (80%), with major thoracic curves (76% Lenke 1-4), and average age of 15 ± 2 years (10-22) at surgery. Most had posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (81%). At this time, 75 (5.2%) patients required reoperation. Twenty-two occurred within 3 months postop, 10 more before 1 year, 12 more before 2 years, another 20 by 5 years, and 10 more after 5 years. This corresponded to an actuarial cumulative survival of 98.3% at 3 months, 97.5% at 1 year, 96.6% at 2 years, 93.9% at 5 years, and 89.8% at the final interval (5-10 yrs).

CONCLUSION

Revisions for scoliosis continue to occur well after 2 years with a 5-year survivorship of 93.9%. Reasons for reoperation are not uniformly distributed over time, with implant-related issues and infection the leading cause for early revision, while late infection was the most common cause after 2 years. Long-term follow-up of these postoperative patients remains important.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Long fusion correction of degenerative adult spinal deformity and the selection of the upper or lower thoracic region as the site of proximal instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes when the upper and lower thoracic regions were used as the site of proximal instrumentation to treat adult spinal deformity.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library searches were performed to identify studies that compared outcome measures when the upper and lower thoracic vertebrae (UTV and LTV, respectively) were used as the site of proximal instrumentation. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for continuous outcomes, and the relative risk (RR) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven articles (n=554 patients) met the final inclusion criteria, and we compared the outcome measures of a long fusion extending to the upper and lower thoracic regions. The pooled analysis revealed that extending fixation into the upper thoracic region decreased the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) revision surgery (RR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.90, p<0.05). The operation time (WMD: 0.93, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.39, p<0.05) and estimated blood loss (WMD: 0.59, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.85, p<0.05) were significantly greater in the UTV group than in the LTV group. No significant differences were found in the Scoliosis Research Society pain, self-image, function, mental health, subtotal, satisfaction or total scores; the total number of complications or the total number of revision surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Long posterior fixation extending into the upper thoracic region reduces the incidence of revision surgery related to PJK; however, it increased the operative level resulting in a longer operative time and greater estimated blood loss. This initial analysis indicates that extending fixation to the upper thoracic region is appropriate for patients who are likely to develop PJK following initial scoliosis correction.

Predictors of Revision Surgical Procedure Excluding Wound Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity and Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Two-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The surgical procedure to treat adult spinal deformity is challenging, with high rates of complications, including revision procedures performed to repair instrumentation failure or unplanned surgical complications. This study quantifies the incidence of, identifies predictors for, and determines health-related quality-of-life changes associated with revision procedures to treat adult spinal deformity.

METHODS

We analyzed a multicenter database of patients who underwent a surgical procedure for adult spinal deformity, which was defined as having an age of eighteen years or older and scoliosis of ≥20°, sagittal vertical axis of ≥5 cm, pelvic tilt of ≥25°, and/or thoracic kyphosis of >60°. We focused on demographic, radiographic, health-related quality-of-life, and operative data at the two-year follow-up. Patients with primary infections were excluded. Predictive and confounding variables for revisions were identified using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-three patients were included in this study; of these patients, forty (16.5%) underwent a revision surgical procedure (15% of these at six weeks, 38% between six weeks and one year, and 48% between one and two years). Screw or cage-related implant complications were the most common indications for revision, followed by proximal junctional kyphosis and rod failure. Positive predictors for a revision surgical procedure included total body mass, with an odds ratio of 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.70) per 10-kg increase, and preoperative sagittal vertical axis, with an odds ratio of 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.28) per 2-cm increase. Factors associated with lower risk of revision included use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) (odds ratio, 0.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.47]) and greater diameter rods (odds ratio, 0.51 [95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.89]). Body mass index, although initially considered a potential predictor for a revision surgical procedure, was not significantly different between primary and revision cohorts on univariate analysis and was therefore not input into the multivariate model. All patients improved in two-year health-related quality-of-life scores; revision subjects had lower overall improvement (Scoliosis Research Society [SRS] score; p = 0.016) from baseline. Revision status did not predict two-year patient satisfaction (p = 0.726), as measured by the SRS Satisfaction domain (SRS-22r).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with greater preoperative sagittal vertical axis and high total body mass are at a higher risk for a revision surgical procedure following procedures to treat adult spinal deformity. Larger diameter rods and BMP-2 were associated with decreased revision odds. Revisions did not impact patient satisfaction at two years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications After Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Even with current techniques and instrumentation, complications can occur after operative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The most dreaded complications-neurologic deficits-are relatively infrequent, occurring in 1% or less of patients. Nonneurologic deficits, such as infection, pseudarthrosis, curve progression, and proximal junctional kyphosis, are more frequent, but are much less likely to require reoperation or to cause poor functional outcomes. Understanding the potential complications of surgical treatment of pediatric spinal deformity is essential for surgical decision-making.

Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years

PURPOSE

Little is known about the long-term status of patients operated for spine deformities. The aim of this study was to determine the survival of primary fusion in adult idiopathic scoliosis and identify the risk factors of revision surgery.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent primary fusion for idiopathic scoliosis between 1983 and 2011 were included in a continuous monocentric retrospective series. Any additional surgery was registered for survival analysis. Survival and follow-up were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and an analysis was performed to identify the risk factors of revision surgery.

RESULTS

This series included 447 women (86.5 %) and 70 men (13.5 %) reviewed after a mean follow-up of 7 years (range 0-26.4). Mean age was 44.4 years. Fusion was performed on a median 11 levels (range 3-15); revision rate was 13 % (CI 10-17), 18 % (CI 14-23) and 20 % (CI 16-26) at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Revision surgery was associated with age, anterior release, length of fusion, the inferior limit of fusion, post-operative sagittal balance and junctional kyphosis. The length of fusion (HR 1.13 per vertebrae fused, p = 0.007) and the lower limit of fusion (HR 5.9, p < 0.001) remained independent predictors of revision surgery on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

This series evaluated the risk of revision surgery following spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Our results show that the risk seemed to increase linearly with a rate of nearly 20 % after 10 years. The length and lower limit of fusion are the main risk factors for revision surgery. Level IV (e.g. case series).

Role of Intraoperative Radiographs in the Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

One of the main goals of scoliosis surgery is to obtain a balanced fused spine. Although preoperative planning remains essential, intraoperative posteroanterior radiographs are the only available tool during the procedure to verify shoulder and coronal spinal balance and, if necessary, adjust the construct. The aim of this study was to quantify the direct influence of intraoperative radiographs on the surgical procedure itself during correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on a monocentric cohort of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing corrective surgery. A total 148 consecutive patients operated in the same department following the same validated preoperative planning method were included in this prospective radiologic study. The mean follow-up averaged 33 months. Frontal Cobb angles, T1 tilt, shoulder tilt, iliolumbar angle, and frontal balance were measured and compared on intraoperative, early postoperative, and latest follow-up radiographs. Any intraoperative modification of the correction performed after analysis of the intraoperative radiograph were recorded.

RESULTS

The analysis of all radiologic parameters was possible in 90.5% of the cases. In 9.5% of the cases, shoulders could not be properly distinguished. Significant modifications on the upper thoracic curve to correct T1 tilt or shoulder balance were performed in 29% of the patients, and changes at the distal levels were recorded in 19%, underlining planification imperfections. On postoperative standing radiographs, the average coronal parameters were neutral, without loss of correction at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative radiographs remain necessary to ensure compensation of the shortcomings of the modern preoperative planification method.

Impact of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Spinal Fusion in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of advancing age on postoperative complications and revision surgery after fusion for scoliosis.

METHODS

A retrospective, cohort study was performed using the Thomson Reuters MarketScan database, examining patients with adult scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion from 2000 to 2009. Primary outcomes included infection, hemorrhage and pulmonary embolism (PE) within 90 days of surgery, and refusion. The effect of increasing age was estimated using the odds ratio (OR) of complications in a multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a Cox proportional hazard model estimated the hazard ratio of refusion.

RESULTS

A total of 8432 patients were included in this study. Overall, the average age was 53.3 years, with 26.90% males and 39% with a Charlson Comorbidity Score of ≥ 1. Most patients had commercial insurance (66.81%), with 26.03% and 7.16% covered by Medicare and Medicaid, respectively. Increasing age (per 5-year increment) was a significant predictor of hemorrhagic complication (OR, 1.06; confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.11; P = 0.0196), PE (OR, 1.09; CI, 1.03-1.16; P = 0.0031), infection (OR, 1.04; CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.0053), and refusion (hazard ratio, 1.07; CI, 1.02-1.13; P = 0.0103).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, age was associated with increased risk of hemorrhage, PE, infection, and refusion. With the aging population, the role of patient age on postoperative healing and outcomes deserves deeper investigation after repair of adult idiopathic scoliosis.

Efficiency of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Iatrogenic Spinal Infections

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to reveal the effectiveness of HBO therapy in iatrogenic spinal infections intractable to antibiotic therapy alone.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The efficiency of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy, which is currently being used in many areas, has been proven in infections in deep and superficial locations and in osteomyelitis. The aim of this study is to reveal effectives of HBO therapy in iatrogenic spinal infections intractable to antibiotic alone therapy.

METHODS

HBO therapy was given to 19 cases of iatrogenic spinal infection between 2008 and 2013. Adjuvant HBO therapy was applied to cases that had exhibited no improvement in clinical and laboratory findings despite medical treatment for at least 3 weeks. Several parameters including demographic characteristics, surgical area, etiology and the surgical treatment modality, microbiology (culture material and causative organism), clinical and laboratory results, duration of HBO therapy, and outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 54.6 years (range: 32-75 years). Iatrogenic spinal infections were most frequent in the lumbar region. It occurred after spine instrumentation in 12 cases and after micro-discectomy in 7 cases. The average number of HBO therapy sessions applied was 20.1 (range: 10-40). Wound discharge and clinical and laboratory findings recovered in all cases at the end of the therapy course. No revision or removal of the instrumentation was necessary in the instrumented cases.

CONCLUSION

HBO therapy is a treatment modality, which is safe and efficient as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of infections. It was also seen to be effective in the prevention of revision procedures and instrumentation failures in iatrogenic osteomyelitis cases, which had occurred following spinal instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Recall Fewer Than 50% of the Risks Discussed in the Informed Consent Process Preoperatively and the Recall Rate Worsens Significantly in the Postoperative Period

STUDY DESIGN

Recall of the informed consent process in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery and their family members was investigated prospectively.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the percentage recall of the most common complications discussed during the informed consent process in adult spinal deformity surgery, assess for differences between patients and family members, and correlate with mental status.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Given high rates of complications in adult spinal deformity surgery, it is critical to shared decision making that patients are adequately informed about risks and are able to recall preoperative discussion of possible complications to mitigate medical legal risk.

METHODS

Patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery underwent an augmented informed consent process involving both verbal and video explanations. Recall of the 11 most common complications was scored. Mental status was assessed with the mini-mental status examination-brief version. Patients subjectively scored the informed consent process and video. After surgery, the recall test and mini-mental status examination-brief version were readministered at 5 additional time points: hospital discharge, 6 to 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Family members were assessed at the first 3 time points for comparison.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients enrolled. Despite ranking the consent process as important (median overall score: 10/10; video score: 9/10), median patient recall was only 45% immediately after discussion and video re-enforcement and subsequently declined to 18% at 6 to 8 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Median family recall trended higher at 55% immediately and 36% at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. The perception of the severity of complications significantly differs between patient and surgeon. Mental status scores showed a transient, significant decrease from preoperation to discharge but were significantly higher at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Despite being well-informed in an optimized informed consent process, patients cannot recall most surgical risks discussed and recall declines over time. Significant progress remains to improve informed consent retention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Unplanned Hospital Readmissions and Reoperations After Pediatric Spinal Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the rates and reasons for unplanned readmissions and reoperation after pediatric spinal fusion surgery at our institution and to identify risk factors by analyzing patient and surgical characteristics. Unplanned readmission and reoperation were defined as unplanned events within 90 days of the index surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The rate of unplanned readmission and reoperation after pediatric spinal fusion surgery is not well established.

METHODS

Clinical records were reviewed for all children who underwent spinal fusion surgical procedures for spinal deformity correction performed by 1 surgeon from 2000 through 2013 at our institution. Inclusion criteria were age of 10 to 18 years at surgery, fusion spanning more than 5 vertebral levels, and 3 months of clinical or radiographical follow-up (1002 patients met these criteria). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were created. Statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05 for all analyses.

RESULTS

The overall 90-day unplanned readmission and reoperation rates were 8.0% and 3.8%, respectively. The most common causes of readmission were wound dehiscence (1.8%), deep wound infection (1.5%), pulmonary complications (1%), and superficial wound infection (0.9%). Univariate analysis showed that readmission was significantly associated with a higher number of levels fused, greater estimated blood loss, longer length of stay, and certain diagnoses; reoperation was significantly associated with a higher number of levels fused and certain diagnoses. On multivariate analysis, only patient diagnosis was found to be significantly associated with readmission and reoperation; patients with congenital scoliosis, genetic or syndromic scoliosis, cerebral palsy, and other neuromuscular disorders had significantly higher rates.

CONCLUSION

Unplanned readmission rate after pediatric spinal fusion surgery was 8%, most commonly for wound dehiscence and deep and superficial infections. Increased intraoperative blood loss, higher number of levels fused, and certain diagnoses are risk factors for unplanned readmission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Revision surgery for pediatric spine deformity: corrective osteotomies

BACKGROUND

Revision spinal deformity surgery is a considerable undertaking and should never be taken lightly. The complication rates are typically higher than index surgery and technical difficulties are of greater magnitude.

METHODS

A review of the literature on revision surgery on pediatric spine deformities is provided with technical details of vertebral column resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful planning and preparation as well as previous experience with such deformities are of utmost importance to achieve satisfactory results.

Unanticipated revision surgery in adult spinal deformity: an experience with 815 cases at one institution

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

This study reviewed the overall prevalence and indications of revision surgical procedures for adult scoliosis in a single institution. In this largest single-institution series, revision surgery in adult scoliosis was required for a relatively low proportion of cases (7.61%). The main indications were implant breakage, deformity progression, and infection.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spine fusion is considered as the final therapeutic intervention in the management of adult scoliosis. However, reports on the repeat surgical intervention of adult scoliosis predate the use of advanced instrumentation systems.

METHODS

The scoliosis database of our center was searched, and all cases with index spinal fusion surgical procedures performed for adult scoliosis from 1998 to 2011 with the follow-up period of more than 2 years were identified. The clinical data and radiographs of patients were reviewed to provide information on the indication of initial operation and any subsequent revision surgery. A total of 815 patients were identified, with a mean age of 30.49 years (range, 20-76 yr). The mean follow-up periods were 6.4 years (range, 2-15 yr) for the entire cohort and 7.6 years (range, 2.5-12 yr) for the subset of the cohort requiring revision.

RESULTS

The patients exhibiting multiple reasons for revision were classified under primary reason and subjected to subsequent analysis. Among the 815 patients, 62 (7.61%) underwent at least 1 revision surgery. The most common reasons for revision were implant breakage (23/62; 37.1%), deformity progression (10/62; 16.1%), and infection (9/62; 14.5%). The other indications were pseudarthrosis (n = 8), implant dislodgement (n = 6), junctional kyphosis (n = 5), and neurological deficit (n = 1). Revision rate was significantly higher in patients older than 40 years (15.23% vs. 5.87%), in patients with degenerative or congenital scoliosis (15.12% vs. 12.82%), or in patients with hybrid constructs (12.12% vs. 5.82%).

CONCLUSION

In this largest single-institution series, revision surgery after index spinal fusion in patients with adult scoliosis was required for a relatively low proportion of surgical cases (7.61%). The main indications for revision were implant breakage, deformity progression, and infection.

Utility of Postoperative Radiographs for Pediatric Scoliosis: Association Between History and Physical Examination Findings and Radiographic Findings

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radiographs are routinely obtained following surgery for the correction of scoliosis in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the utility of obtaining routine postoperative radiographs in the management of these patients.

METHODS

A total of 1969 clinic notes and corresponding radiographs regarding 451 consecutive patients with scoliosis (age range, ten to eighteen years) who had surgical correction over a ten-year period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Curve etiology, preoperative curve characteristics, and surgical procedures performed were recorded. All postoperative clinic notes and radiographs were reviewed for abnormalities and changes in treatment course. It was then determined whether clinical signs and symptoms and/or abnormal radiographic findings led to a change in treatment course, which was defined as a therapeutic intervention or further diagnostic testing.

RESULTS

Of the 451 patients in this study (average age [and standard deviation], 14.7 ± 2.4 years), 72.5% had adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 23.3% had neuromuscular scoliosis, and 4.2% had other underlying causes of scoliosis. A change in treatment course occurred in the cases of forty-two patients, all of whom had symptomatic findings on postoperative history and physical examination and only fifteen of whom had supportive abnormal findings on postoperative radiographs. Curve etiology and surgical procedures performed had no impact on radiographic utility. A significant increase in utility was seen for radiographs obtained at visits one year or more following surgery compared with those obtained at visits less than one year following surgery (1.7% compared with 0.3%, p = 0.001). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of routine postoperative radiographs in guiding treatment course were 35.7%, 98.1%, 28.8%, and 98.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine radiographs provide low utility in guiding the course of treatment for asymptomatic pediatric patients following surgery for scoliosis. The results of this study suggest that patient or caregiver complaints, comorbidities, and clinical suspicion should be considered before obtaining radiographs at postoperative visits in order to minimize radiation exposure in pediatric patients and reduce medical costs without compromising care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of the Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach versus Posterior-Only Approach in Scoliosis Treatment

Study Design

This is descriptive analytical study.

Purpose

The present study aims at comparing treatment results found between the two groups comprising of patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion using thoracic pedicle screws and the ones who underwent combined anterior-posterior method, respectively.

Overview of Literature

There was controversy about surgical techniques including anterior, posterior, or a combined anterior-posterior approaches are applied to treat non-congenital scoliosis with surgical indications.

Methods

Medical records of 50 patients suffering from thoracic non-congenital scoliosis with curves exceeding 70° were reviewed. In this study, 25 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion using thoracic pedicle screws were compared with 25 patients who underwent combined anterior-posterior method.

Results

Patients treated through posterior-only and combined approaches were respectively hospitalized for 11.84±5.18 and 26.5±5.2 days (p=0.001). There was a significant difference between these two groups considering intensive care unit admission duration (p=0.001), correction in sagittal view of X-ray (p=0.01), and number of days the patients underwent traction (0.001). Finally, coronal view was corrected without any significant difference (p=0.2).

Conclusions

According to our findings, it is hypothesized that posterior-only method is associated with some significant advantages and is an advisable method in patients with severe scoliosis over than 70°.

Massive hemothorax caused by Gelpi retractor during posterior correction surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case report

Background context

Gelpi retractors are used in surgery because they can reduce paravertebral muscle damage during retraction. No pleural injuries associated with their use in posterior spine surgery have been reported.

Purpose

To describe a patient who suffered a massive postoperative hemothorax caused by a Gelpi retractor used during posterior correction surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Study design

Case report.

Methods

A case report of a rare hemothorax complication due to a Gelpi retractor is reported. The relevant literature was reviewed.

Results

A 12-year-old girl with Lenke type 2 AIS, with curves of 60° at T2-7 and 75° at T7-L1, underwent posterior correction and fusion surgery using a segmental pedicle screw construct placed between T2 and L2. Although the patient’s vital signs were stable during and soon after the surgery, a chest x-ray taken one day later revealed a massive left hemothorax. Her hemoglobin concentration was decreased to 5.5g/dl, and SpO₂ remained as low as 92% even with oxygen administration. Thoracoscopy revealed subpleural hemorrhaging at several points in the left upper intercostal area (T3-6), and a penetration of the pleura between the left 4th and 5th ribs. Active bleeding had already stopped. The tip of the Gelpi retractor appeared to have penetrated the pleura. A chest tube was placed in the patient to treat the hemothorax.

Conclusions

A pleural injury by the Gelpi retractor was determined to be the cause of the hemothorax in this case. The patient’s prominent thoracic hump may have increased the risk of such an injury because the tip of a Gelpi retractor might easily have become stuck in the intercostal space rather than the paravertebral muscles.

Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database

Object

Complications and reoperation for surgery to correct adult spinal deformity are not infrequent, and many studies have analyzed the rates and factors that influence the likelihood of reoperation. However, there is a need for more comprehensive analyses of reoperation in adult spinal deformity surgery from a global standpoint, particularly focusing on the 1st year following operation and considering radiographic parameters and the effects of reoperation on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study attempts to determine the prevalence of reoperation following surgery for adult spinal deformity, assess the indications for these reoperations, evaluate for a relation between specific radiographic parameters and the need for reoperation, and determine the potential impact of reoperation on HRQOL measures.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database collected through the International Spine Study Group. Data collected included age, body mass index, sex, date of surgery, information regarding complications, reoperation dates, length of stay, and operation time. The radiographic parameters assessed were total number of levels instrumented, total number of interbody fusions, C-7 sagittal vertical axis, uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) location, and presence of 3-column osteotomies. The HRQOL assessment included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component and mental component summary, and SRS-22 scores. Smoking history, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification grades were also collected and assessed for correlation with risk of early reoperation. Various statistical tests were performed for evaluation of specific factors listed above, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Fifty-nine (17%) of a total of 352 patients required reoperation. Forty-four (12.5%) of the reoperations occurred within 1 year after the initial surgery, including 17 reoperations (5%) within 30 days.

Two hundred sixty-eight patients had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Fifty-three (20%) of these patients had a 3-column osteotomy, and 10 (19%) of these 53 required reoperation within 1 year of the initial procedure. However, 3-column osteotomy was not predictive of reoperation within 1 year, p = 0.5476). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to the distribution of UIV, and UIV did not have a significant effect on reoperation rates. Patients needing reoperation within 1 year had worse ODI and SRS-22 scores measured at 1-year follow-up than patients not requiring operation.

Conclusions

Analysis of data from a large multicenter adult spinal deformity database shows an overall 17% reoperation rate, with a 19% reoperation rate for patients treated with 3-column osteotomy and a 16% reoperation rate for patients not treated with 3-column osteotomy. The most common indications for reoperation included instrumentation complications and radiographic failure. Reoperation significantly affected HRQOL outcomes at 1-year follow-up. The need for reoperation may be minimized by carefully considering spinal alignment, termination of fixation, and type of surgical procedure (presence of osteotomy). Precautions should be taken to avoid malposition or instrumentation (rod) failure.

Unplanned return to the operating room in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: are we doing better with pedicle screws?

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence, timing, and risk factors for reoperation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with pedicle screws (PSs) compared with hybrid (Hb) constructs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Rates of return to the operating room (OR) after definitive fusion for AIS vary, with a paucity of data on PS constructs.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter database was retrospectively queried to identify consecutive patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion with either PS or Hb constructs with a minimum 2-year follow-up. All reoperations were stratified into an early group (<60 d) or a late group (>60 d). Univariate and multivariate logistical analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors related to reoperation.

RESULTS

A total of 627 patients met the inclusion criteria (PS = 540, Hb = 87). There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of reoperations between the PS (3.5%) and Hb groups (12.6%), P < 0.001. Early return to the OR occurred in 2.0% of the patients with PS compared with 3.4% in the Hb group, P = 0.43. Late returns to the OR occurred in 1.5% of PS group versus 9.2% of the Hb group, P < 0.001. Multivariate analysis revealed longer operating time as an independent risk factor for an unplanned return to the OR in patients treated with PSs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that patients with AIS treated with PS have decreased rates of unplanned return to the OR when compared with patients with Hb constructs. The majority of returns to the OR were early (<60 d) for the PS group compared with late (>60 d) for the Hb group. Longer operative times increased the risk of unplanned reoperation for the PS group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Adjacent segment disease in the lumbar spine following different treatment interventions

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is symptomatic deterioration of spinal levels adjacent to the site of a previous fusion. A critical issue related to ASD is whether deterioration of spinal segments adjacent to a fusion is due to the spinal intervention or due to the natural history of spinal degenerative disease.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent clinical literature on adjacent segment disease in light of the natural history, patient-modifiable risk factors, surgical risk factors, sagittal balance, and new technology.

STUDY DESIGN

This review will evaluate the recent literature on genetic and hereditary components of spinal degenerative disease and potential links to the development of ASD.

METHODS

After a meticulous search of Medline for relevant articles pertaining to our review, we summarized the recent literature on the rate of ASD and the effect of various interventions, including motion preservation, sagittal imbalance, arthroplasty, and minimally invasive surgery.

RESULTS

The reported rate of ASD after decompression and stabilization procedures is approximately 2% to 3% per year. The factors that are consistently associated with adjacent segment disease include laminectomy adjacent to a fusion and a sagittal imbalance.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal surgical interventions have been associated with ASD. However, whether such interventions may lead to an acceleration of the natural history of the disease remains questionable.

Complications of surgical treatment of pediatric spinal deformities

Surgery in a child with spinal deformity is challenging. Although current orthopedic practice ensures good long-term surgical results, complications occur. Idiopathic scoliosis represents the most extensively investigated deformity of the pediatric spine. Nonidiopathic deformities of the spine are at higher risk for perioperative and long-term complications, mainly because of underlying comorbidities. A multidisciplinary treatment strategy is helpful to assure optimization of medical conditions before surgery. Awareness of complications that occur during or after spine surgery is essential to avoid a poor outcome and for future surgical decision making. This article summarizes the complications of surgical treatment of the growing spine.

Outcome of Revision Surgery in Pediatric Spine Deformity Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVES

To report the complications and outcomes of pediatric revision spine surgery and review the surgical indications and treatment methods.

BACKGROUND SUMMARY

Recent reports have shown the necessity of revision spine surgery for pediatric deformities. Many reports have shown the result of revision surgery for pediatric spinal deformity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 638 patients with pediatric spinal deformity who were treated with surgery from 1996 to 2007. We identified 50 patients who underwent revision spinal fusion surgery with a minimum of 3 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 4 years (range, 3-8.3 years). The diagnosis at index surgery was idiopathic scoliosis in 18 patients, congenital scoliosis in 13, neuromuscular scoliosis in 13, tumor and spinal arteriovenous malformation in 4, burst fracture in thoracic spine in 1, and Scheuermann kyphosis in 1. The primary surgeries were 1 hemi epiphysiodesis, 3 anterior spinal fusions, 4 posterior decompressions, 8 combined anterior and posterior spinal fusions, and 34 posterior spinal fusions. A total of 16 patients had pseudarthrosis, 12 decompensation, 11 progressive kyphosis, 8 crankshaft phenomenon, 2 infections, and 1 junctional degeneration. All 50 reoperations included spinal instrumentation and fusion. The revision surgeries were 2 anterior spinal fusions, 14 posterior fusions, and 34 combined anterior and posterior spinal fusions. Spine arthrodesis was obtained in 98% of patients (49 of 50) and complications occurred in 14% of patients (7 of 50). The Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire outcomes at the latest follow-up were as follows: total 3.95, function 3.88, pain 3.83, self-image 3.98, and mental health 4.04.

CONCLUSION

Pseudarthrosis was the most common indication for revision surgery, and bony union was achieved in 98% with revision surgery. Despite the complications, pediatric revision spine surgery can achieve successful outcomes.

Repeat surgical interventions following "definitive" instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: five-year update on a previously published cohort

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the overall reoperation rate and factors contributing to reoperation in a recent 5-year cohort of patients (2003-2007) undergoing spinal deformity surgery. These patients were compared with a previously published 15-year cohort of consecutive patients (1988-2002) from the same institution to assess for any significant differences in reoperation rates.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In a previously published report from this institution, the reoperation rate for patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated during a 15-year period (1988-2002) was 12.9%. That group was predominantly treated with first-generation TSRH (Medtronic, Memphis, TN) implants and CD implants. Lower profile, more rigid implant systems are now used along with refined techniques for correction of scoliosis deformity. We hypothesized that these factors would lead to lower rates of reoperation. METHODS.: The medical records of 452 consecutive patients (older than 9 yr) surgically treated for idiopathic scoliosis at one institution during 5 years (2003-2007) were reviewed to identify those who required reoperation.

RESULTS

The reoperation rate for this cohort was 7.5% (34 of 452 patients). Compared with the prior cohort, significant decreases were noted with regard to total reoperation rate as well as reoperation due to infection and pseudarthrosis. Trends were noted toward decreased rates of reoperation due to prominent implants, dislodged implants, and implant proximity to vital structures. Within the newer cohort, a trend toward decreased reoperation rate was also noted for lower profile implant systems compared with first-generation TSRH implants.

CONCLUSION

With the evolution of newer lower profile segmental implant systems that provide more rigid fixation and with the advancements in techniques for deformity correction, the repeat surgical intervention rate for idiopathic scoliosis has decreased.

Unanticipated revision surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to share our experience in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), specifically the rate of revision surgeries and their indications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Minimizing AIS surgical morbidity includes prevention of short- and long-term complications that could require an unanticipated revision. There have been an increasing number of reports about revision rates and their causes in AIS. This study summarizes the experience of a large patient population treated by a single surgeon in a single institution.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgical treatment for AIS between 10 and 20 years of age during 1983 to 2005 were reviewed. All revision surgeries performed during the same period were searched. The indications for revision and type of procedure performed were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 502 patients with AIS underwent spinal fusion with instrumentation at an average age of 14.3 years at initial surgery. In 485 patients, the surgery consisted of posterior-only spinal fusion. A total of 24 revision surgeries were performed for 23 patients (4.9%; cumulative probability of revision = 8%). The primary indications for revision were residual rib deformity (n = 8), instrumentation dislodgement (n = 4), compensatory curve progression (n = 3), junctional kyphosis (n = 3), and symptomatic implants (n = 3). One patient had a late infection. There was 1 case of pseudoarthrosis. One patient requested scar revision. There were no cases of neurological deficit.

CONCLUSION

In this single-surgeon series, revision after the index spinal fusion was required for a relatively low proportion of patients. The main indications for revision were residual rib deformity, hook dislodgment, and progression of the unfused compensatory curve.

Does a long-fusion "T3-sacrum" portend a worse outcome than a short-fusion "T10-sacrum" in primary surgery for adult scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinicoradiographic analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the upper thoracic (UT) and lower thoracic (LT) spines as the upper instrumented vertebra in primary fusions to the sacrum for adult scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal level at which a fusion to the sacrum is terminated proximally for adult scoliosis remains controversial. We hypothesized that (1) UT spine would have an increased pseudarthrosis, more perioperative complications, and worse outcomes and (2) LT spine would have more proximal junctional kyphosis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary surgery for adult scoliosis between 2002 and 2006 were studied. UT and LT groups were matched cohorts. Minimum follow-up for all patients was 2 years. Scoliosis Research Society scores and Oswestry Disability Index were the clinical outcome measures.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (UT = 20, LT = 38) with a mean age of 55.7 years were followed for an average of 3.0 ± 1.1 years. The UT group had greater preoperative thoracic kyphosis and coronal Cobb values (P < 0.05). Diagnoses were idiopathic scoliosis (75.9%) and degenerative scoliosis (24.1%). The UT cohort had a greater number of levels fused (15.8 vs. 8.6) and higher blood loss (1350 mL vs. 811 mL). Operative time, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 per level, and caudal interbody grafting (80.0% UT vs. 89.5% LT) were similar. The UT group experienced an increased number of perioperative complications (30.0% vs. 15.8%), more pseudarthrosis (20.0% vs. 5.3%), and a higher prevalence of revision surgery (20.0% vs. 10.5%). The LT group had more proximal junctional kyphosis (18.4% vs. 10.0%). Scoliosis Research Society scores and Oswestry Disability Index were improved in both cohorts in all domains (P < 0.001), except function (P = 0.07) and mental health (P = 0.27), which were not significantly improved in the UT group.

CONCLUSION

With long fusions to the sacrum, one should anticipate more perioperative complications, a higher pseudarthrosis rate, and perhaps more revision surgery than short fusions. Short fusions may result in a more proximal junctional kyphosis, only rarely requiring revision surgery.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of online community members--does it represent reality?

BACKGROUND

The decision to undergo surgery for scoliosis is shared between the physician, patient, and family. In an effort to obtain objective data regarding scoliosis surgery, patients often use the Internet, which includes sharing experiences in online communities. To this end, physicians have limited knowledge about disease-specific online communities.

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients who use disease-specific online communities.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective clinical study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred ninety-five patients with scoliosis who are also members of a popular scoliosis-specific online community.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Five domains of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) quality-of-life questionnaire: function, pain, mental health, self-image, and satisfaction.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was submitted by members of a scoliosis-specific online community. One hundred ninety-five patients with scoliosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria, which represented 54% of all active members who have logged into this community during the time of data collection. A descriptive analysis was performed for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed a bimodal age distribution. Most online members were female (74%) and underwent surgical treatment (78%). Of all surgical patients, 52% had surgery between the age of 10 and 18 years. The average time since surgery (follow-up) was 10 years and 9 months. A revision rate of 17% was calculated, which increased with longer follow-up. Five of nine surgical subgroups significantly outperformed nonsurgical patients in regards of SRS-22 total scores.

CONCLUSION

This study supports that members from an online scoliosis community may be the representative sample of the general scoliosis patient population. The information obtained may be useful for physicians to understand patient concerns and mitigate treatment expectations when counseling patients.

Complications in the surgical treatment of 19,360 cases of pediatric scoliosis: a review of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a multicenter database.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the complication rates associated with surgical treatment of pediatric scoliosis and to assess variables associated with increased complication rates.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Wide variability is reported for complications associated with the operative treatment of pediatric scoliosis. Limited number of patients, surgeons, and diagnoses occur in most reports. The Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) database aggregates deidentified data, permitting determination of complication rates from large numbers of patients and surgeons.

METHODS

Cases of pediatric scoliosis (age ≤18 years), entered into the Scoliosis Research Society M&M database between 2004 and 2007, were analyzed. Age, scoliosis type, type of instrumentation used, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 19,360 cases fulfilled inclusion criteria. Of these, complications occurred in 1971 (10.2%) cases. Overall complication rates differed significantly among idiopathic, congenital, and neuromuscular cases (P < 0.001). Neuromuscular scoliosis had the highest rate of complications (17.9%), followed by congenital scoliosis (10.6%) and idiopathic scoliosis (6.3%). Rates of neurologic deficit also differed significantly based on the etiology of scoliosis (P < 0.001), with the highest rate among congenital cases (2.0%), followed by neuromuscular types (1.1%) and idiopathic scoliosis (0.8%). Neur-omuscular scoliosis and congenital scoliosis had the highest rates of mortality (0.3% each), followed by idiopathic scoliosis (0.02%). Higher rates of new neurologic deficits were associated with revision procedures (P < 0.001) and with the use of corrective osteotomies (P < 0.001). The rates of new neurologic deficit were significantly higher for procedures using anterior screw-only constructs (2.0%) or wire-only constructs (1.7%), compared with pedicle screw-only constructs (0.7%) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this review of a large multicenter database of surgically treated pediatric scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis had the highest morbidity, but relatively high complication rates occurred in all groups. These data may be useful for preoperative counseling and surgical decision-making in the treatment of pediatric scoliosis.

Idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Scoliosis is a three-dimensional deviation of the spinal axis. The main diagnostic criterion is spinal curvature exceeding 10° on a plain anteroposterior X-ray image. Scoliosis is called idiopathic when no other underlying disease can be identified.

METHODS

Selective literature review and recommendations of the relevant medical societies in Germany and abroad.

RESULTS

Scoliosis in children of school age and above primarily occurs in girls. Its prevalence is 1% to 2% among adolescents, but more than 50% among persons over age 60. The therapeutic goal in children is to prevent progression. In children, scoliosis of 20° or more should be treated with a brace, and scoliosis of 45° or more with surgery. The treatment of adults with scoliosis is determined on an individual basis, with physiotherapy and braces playing a relatively minor role. Adults (even elderly adults) who have scoliosis and sagittal imbalance may be best served by surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Scoliosis is common. Early diagnosis makes a major difference in the choice of treatment.