Correlation of C2 fractures and vertebral artery injury

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vertebral Artery Injury After Cervical Spine Trauma

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Identify the incidence, mechanism of injury, investigations, management, and outcomes of Vertebral Artery Injury (VAI) after cervical spine trauma.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO-ID CRD42021295265). Three databases were searched (PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, CINAHL PLUS). Incidence of VAI, investigations to diagnose (Computed Tomography Angiography, Digital Subtraction Angiography, Magnetic Resonance Angiography), stroke incidence, and management paradigms (conservative, antiplatelets, anticoagulants, surgical, endovascular treatment) were delineated. Incidence was calculated using pooled proportions random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies were included (1777 patients). 20-studies (n = 503) included data on trauma type; 75.5% (n = 380) suffered blunt trauma and 24.5% (n = 123) penetrating. The overall incidence of VAI was .95% (95% CI 0.65-1.29). From the 16 studies which reported data on outcomes, 8.87% (95% CI 5.34- 12.99) of patients with VAI had a posterior stroke. Of the 33 studies with investigation data, 91.7% (2929/3629) underwent diagnostic CTA; 7.5% (242/3629) underwent MRA and 3.0% (98/3629) underwent DSA. Management data from 20 papers (n = 475) showed 17.9% (n = 85) undergoing conservative therapy, anticoagulation in 14.1% (n = 67), antiplatelets in 16.4% (n = 78), combined therapy in 25.5% (n = 121) and the rest (n = 124) managed using surgical and endovascular treatments.

CONCLUSION

VAI in cervical spine trauma has an approximate posterior circulation stroke risk of 9%. Optimal management paradigms for the prevention and management of VAI are yet to be standardized and require further research.

Mechanical Thrombectomy and Parent Artery Occlusion for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Due to Vertebral Fracture and Artery Dissection: A Case Report

Objective

Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) secondary to traumatic vertebral artery (VA) dissection caused by vertebral fracture is a rare cause of acute ischemic stroke, and optimal management, such as antithrombotic agents, surgical fixation, and parent artery occlusion (PAO), has been controversial. We report a case in which mechanical thrombectomy and PAO were performed for a BAO due to right VA dissection caused by a transverse foramen fracture of the axis vertebra.

Case Presentation

A patient in her 80s suffered from a backward fall, and a neck CT revealed a fracture and dislocation of the right lateral mass of the axis and a compressed transverse foramen. The patient was instructed to admit and to remain in bed rest; however, she suddenly lost consciousness the following day. The CTA revealed right VA occlusion and BAO; therefore, the patient underwent mechanical thrombectomy and the BAO was successfully reperfused but the VA stenotic dissection remained. PAO of the right VA was performed on the fifth day after the accident to prevent BAO recurrence.

Conclusion

Mechanical thrombectomy is an effective treatment for BAO caused by VA dissection, and PAO may contribute to the prevention of stroke recurrence.

Upper cervical spine fracture patterns and blunt cerebrovascular injuries

PURPOSE

To determine patterns of C1 and C2 vertebral fractures that are associated with blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of clinical and imaging reports at a level 1 trauma center over 10 consecutive years was conducted in patients with C1 and C2 fractures. Student t-test and chi-squared analyses were used to determine associations between fracture levels and fracture types with the presence of BCVI on CTA and/or MRI or stroke on CT and/or MRI.

RESULTS

Multilevel fractures were associated with higher incidence of BCVI compared to isolated C1 or C2 fractures (p < 0.01), but not with stroke (p = 0.16). There was no difference in incidence of BCVI or stroke between isolated C1 and isolated C2 fractures (p = 0.46, p = 0.25). Involvement of the transverse foramen (TF) alone was not associated with BCVI or stroke (p = 0.10-0.40, p = 0.34-0.43). However, TF fractures that were comminuted or contained fracture fragment(s) were associated with increased BCVI (p < 0.01, p = 0.02), though not with stroke (p = 0.11, p = 0.09). In addition, high-energy mechanism of injury was also associated with BCVI (p < 0.01) and stroke (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

C1 and C2 fractures are associated with BCVI in the presence of high-energy mechanism of injury, concomitant fractures of other cervical vertebral body levels, comminuted TF fractures, or TF fractures with internal fragments. Attention to these fracture parameters is important in evaluating C1 and C2 fractures for BCVI.

Direct Transpedicular C2 Fixation for the Surgical Management of Hangman's Fractures: A "Second Youth" for the Judet Approach

PURPOSE

The optimal management of hangman's fractures is controversial and the standard of care has been neither established nor supported by strong evidence. The Judet approach has been introduced in 1970 as surgical option to treat selected cases of hangman's fractures, harboring the advantage to preserve motion of the craniovertebral junction and to restore the C2 vertebra anatomy by insertion of transpedicular screws through the fracture line. This paper reviews the literature on hangman's fractures surgically managed by Judet approach, and reports two new illustrative cases.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for the review process. After initial screening of abstracts and papers, 13 manuscripts were included in the present review.Two cases of hangman's fractures, a Levine-Edwards type I and a type IIA, respectively, treated with direct transpedicular C2 screw fixation are reported. Surgical steps of the Judet approach are also described.

RESULTS

Our literature review revealed that the technique described by Judet is gaining appeal only in recent years and there is no consensus on surgical indications.No surgery-related complications were observed in the two reported cases. Patients experienced a significant reduction of neck pain postoperatively. Motion of craniovertebral junction was preserved in both patients at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct transpedicular osteosynthesis of C2-pars interarticularis fracture has been already demonstrated as effective in type II and IIA hangman's fractures. The application of such technique in selected patients with atypical type I fractures should also be considered in order to achieve early mobilization and avoid external fixation.

Atlantoaxial Spondyloptosis with Type II Odontoid Fractures: A Report of 2 Cases

CASE

Two patients with delayed presentations of neck pain and fixed kyphotic deformity after trauma were found to have atlantoaxial spondyloptosis (AAS) with type II dens fractures. Owing to the rarity of AAS, outcomes and optimal treatment are not well understood. In both cases, closed reduction was achieved with a dynamic overhead traction setup, followed by posterior surgical stabilization with C1-2 screw fixation.

CONCLUSION

Closed reduction remains a challenge because of the marked deformity of interlocking C1-C2 joints. However, patients with chronic fixed atlantoaxial dislocation due to odontoid fractures can be safely managed with closed reduction and fusion of C1-C2.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Traumatic spondylolisthesis of axis: clinical and imaging experience at a level one trauma center

PURPOSE

Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis (TSA) with bilateral pars interarticularis fracture (a pattern also known as Hangman's fractures) accounts for 4-5% of all cervical fractures. Various classification systems have been described to assist therapeutic decision-making. The goal is to reassess the utility of these classifications for treatment strategy and evaluate additional imaging associations.

METHODS

This is an IRB approved, retrospective analysis of patients with imaging diagnosis of TSA from 2016 to 2019. Consensus reads were performed classifying TSA into various Levine and Edwards subtypes and typical vs. atypical fractures. Other imaging findings such as additional cervical fractures, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and vertebral artery injury were recorded. Treatment strategy and outcome were reviewed from clinical charts. Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were included, with a mean age of 62.7 ± 25 years, and male to female ratio of 1:1.2. Motor vehicle collision was the most common cause of TSA. Type I and III injuries were the most and the least common injuries, respectively. Patients with type I injuries were found to have good healing rates with conservative management (p < 0.001) while type IIa and III injuries were managed with surgical stabilization (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). No statistical difference was observed in the treatment strategy for type II fractures (p = 0.12) and its prediction of the associated injuries. Atypical fractures were not found to have a higher incidence of SCI (p = 0.31). A further analysis revealed significantly higher-grade vertebral artery injuries (grades III and IV according to Biffl grading) in patients with type IIa and III injuries (p = 0.001) and an 11-fold increased risk of TBI compared to type I and type II fractures (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

TSA fracture types were not associated with any clinical outcome. Levine and Edwards type II classification itself is not enough to guide the treatment plan and does not account for associated injuries. Additional imaging markers may be needed.

Cervical Computed Tomography Angiography Rarely Leads to Intervention in Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the management of trauma patients with cervical spine fractures by identifying high-risk patients for vertebral artery injury (VAI), and evaluating how frequently patients undergo subsequent surgical/procedural intervention as a result of these findings.

METHODS

All trauma patients with cervical spine fractures who underwent CTA of the head and neck at our institution between January 2013 and October 2017 were identified. Patients were indicated for CTA according to our institutional protocol based on the modified Denver criteria, and included patients with cervical fractures on scout CT. Those with positive VAI were noted, along with their fracture location, and presence or absence of neurological deficit on physical examination. Statistical analysis was performed and odds ratios were calculated comparing the relationship of cervical spine fracture with presence of VAI.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included in our study. Of those, 25 patients (17.4%) were found to have VAI. Two patients (1.4%) with VAI underwent subsequent surgical/procedural intervention. Of the 25 cervical fractures with a VAI, 20 (80%), were found to involve the upper cervical region (4.2 OR, 95% CI 1.5-12.0; P = .007). Of the 25 who had a VAI, 9 were unable to undergo reliable neurologic examination. Of the remaining 16 patients, 5 (31.3%) had motor or sensory deficits localized to the side of the VAI, with no other attributable etiology.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical spine fractures located in the region of the C1-C3 vertebrae were more likely to have an associated VAI on CTA. VAI should also be considered in cervical trauma patients who present with neurological deficits not clearly explained by other pathology. Despite a finding of VAI, patients rarely underwent subsequent surgical or procedural intervention.

Unstable Hangman Fracture Complicated by Vertebral-Venous Fistula: Surgical Considerations and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Hangman fracture or traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis associated with a traumatic vertebral venous fistula (VVF) is a rare entity and sparsely reported in literature. Standard recommendations for management of such rare and complex scenarios are not available and hence the strategy has to be individualized on a case-by-case basis.

METHODS

We report a 70-year-old man having an unstable hangman fracture with VVF. Both pathologies were simultaneously managed uniquely. The VVF was managed by endovascular occlusion. The fracture was managed by anterior fusion alone as posterior fusion was deemed riskier in the aftermath of a recently occluded VVF. The patient had good neck function and bony fusion at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This case report emphasizes the need for timely recognition and management of a VVF, which can rarely coexist with hangman fracture, and discusses the interesting surgical paradigms in the management. We also present a review of literature.

Best practice guidelines for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI)

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a non-penetrating injury to the carotid and/or vertebral artery that may cause stroke in trauma patients. Historically BCVI has been considered rare but more recent publications indicate an overall incidence of 1-2% in the in-hospital trauma population and as high as 9% in patients with severe head injury. The indications for screening, treatment and follow-up of these patients have been controversial for years with few clear recommendations. In an attempt to provide a clinically oriented guideline for the handling of BCVI patients a working committee was created. The current guideline is the end result of this committees work. It is based on a systematic literature search and critical review of all available publications in addition to a standardized consensus process. We recommend using the expanded Denver screening criteria and CT angiography (CTA) for the detection of BCVI. Early antithrombotic treatment should be commenced as soon as considered safe and continued for at least 3 months. A CTA at 7 days to confirm or discard the diagnosis as well as a final imaging control at 3 months should be performed.

Treatment of Axis Ring Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative literature review and expert recommendation.

OBJECTIVE

To establish treatment recommendations for axis ring fractures based on the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma.

METHODS

This recommendation summarizes the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma with regard to the treatment of axis ring fractures based on a narrative literature review.

RESULTS

Typical "hangman's fractures" with bilateral separation of the neural arch from C2 and atypical "hangman's fractures" with irregular fracture morphology are described. Computed tomography is the "gold" standard used to detect and analyse these fractures adequately. Furthermore, the detection of vertebral artery integrity is necessary. To classify axis ring fractures, the Levine-Edwards or Josten classification is recommended. In particular, the integrity of the C2/3 disc and the integrity of the anterior longitudinal ligament are used to determine the treatment strategy. While Levine-Edwards type I and type IIA (Josten type 1 and 2) fractures should be treated conservatively, Levine type II and type III (Josten type 3 and 4) fractures should be treated operatively. Levine-Edwards type II fractures will be predominately treated by anterior C2/3 fusion. Levine-Edwards type III fractures have to be primary reduced, if an anterior fusion is planned (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF] C2/3). If a closed reduction of a type III fracture is impossible, an open reduction and posterior fixation/fusion is the treatment of choice.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment is predominantly reserved for Levine-Edwards I and IIA fractures. Operative treatment should be performed in case of Levine-Edwards II and III fractures.

Vertebral Artery Caught in the Fracture Gap after Traumatic C2/3 Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patient with a C2 fracture and entrapment of the right vertebral artery in the fracture gap.

PURPOSE

Presentation of a case with follow-up until end of treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

METHODS

A 25-year-old woman was brought into our emergency room after falling while riding a horse. She complained of pain in the cervical spine. Clinical examinations showed local tenderness at the upper cervical spine and painful impairment of the mobility of the neck, with no signs of neurological impairment. Radiological diagnostics revealed a traumatic C2/3 spondylolisthesis. A computer tomography (CT) angiographic scan showed a dislocation of the right vertebral artery into the fracture gap without injury to the artery. Open reduction and osteosynthesis were considered of too high risk. Therefore, we conducted fracture treatment with closed reduction and halo fixation. After removal of the halo fixator, the patient was given a soft cervical collar and was advised to rest for additional 6 weeks before beginning gradual activity.

RESULTS

Conventional follow-up revealed osseous consolidation and a CT angiographic scan showed consistent blood flow to the artery.

CONCLUSION

Halo fixation was a safe and effective therapy strategy in the case of vertebral artery entrapment after traumatic C2 spondylolisthesis.

Fractures of the axis: a review of pediatric, adult, and geriatric injuries

Fractures of the second cervical vertebra (C2, axis) are common in adult spine surgery. Those fractures occurring in younger adult patients are often associated with high-energy mechanism trauma, resulting in a "Hangman's Fracture." Management of these fractures is often successful with nonoperative means, though surgery may be needed in those fractures with greater displacement and injury to the C2-C3 disc. Older patients are more likely to sustain fractures of the odontoid process. The evidence supporting surgical management of these fractures is evolving, as there may be a mortality benefit to surgery. Regardless of treatment, longer-term mortality rates are high in this patient population, which should be discussed with the patient and family at the time of injury. Pediatric patients may suffer fractures of the axis, though differentiation of normal and pathologic findings is necessary and more difficult with the skeletally immature spine.

Management of Typical and Atypical Hangman's Fractures

Study Design Retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database. Objective Our aim was to retrospectively review management and outcomes of patients with low-grade hangman's fractures, specifically looking at differences in outcomes between collars and halo immobilization. We also studied fracture patterns and their treatment outcomes. Methods Forty-one patients with hangman's fractures were identified from 105 patients with axis fractures between 2007 and 2013. Typical hangman's fractures were defined as traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis causing a bilateral pars interarticularis fracture. Fractures involving the posterior cortex of C2 on one or both sides or an asymmetrical pattern were defined as atypical. Results There were 41 patients with a mean age of 59 years, with 13 (31.7%) typical and 28 (68.2%) atypical fractures. There were 22 (53.6%) type 1 fractures, 7 (41.4%) type 2 fractures, and 2 (4.9%) type 2a fractures in this series. Cervical collars were used to manage 11 patients (27% of all patients with hangman's fractures) and halo orthosis was used in 27 (65.8%). Three (7.3%) patients underwent surgical fixation of the fracture. Bony union was achieved in all patients on radiologic follow-up. Permanent neurologic deficit occurred in one patient due to associated injuries. Neck pain and stiffness were reported more commonly in the atypical group, but this finding was not statistically significant. Conclusions The majority of hangman type fractures can be treated nonoperatively. We found no difference in outcomes between a rigid collar or halo immobilization for treatment of low-grade fractures. Radiologic follow-up is essential to identify cases of nonunion.

Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis Vertebra in Adults

Study Design Narrative review. Objective To elucidate the current concepts in diagnosis and treatment of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. Methods Literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases. Results The traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis accounts to 5% of all cervical spine injuries and is defined by a bilateral separation of the C2 vertebral body from the neural arch. The precise location of the fracture line may vary widely. For understanding the pathobiomechanics, the involvement of the C2-C3 disk is essential. Although its synonym "hangman's fracture" suggests an extension moment as primary injury mechanism, flexion moments are also proven to cause such fracture morphology. The axial force vector (distraction versus compression) is thought to have a significant effect on the neurologic involvement. The most widely accepted classifications, according to Effendi and modified by Levine, regard the displacement of the C2 vertebral body and possible locking of the facet joints. For decisions on conservative versus surgical therapy, a definitive statement about the stability is essential. The stability is determined by involvement of the C2-C3 disk and longitudinal ligaments, which frequently cannot be assessed by X-ray or computed tomography alone. The assessment of this soft tissue injury therefore requires additional imaging either by magnetic resonance imaging to display the disk and longitudinal ligaments or dynamic fluoroscopy to assess functional behavior of the C2-C3 motion segment. If stability is proven, an immobilization of the cervical spine in a semirigid cervical collar is sufficient. Unstable lesions require surgical stabilization. The standard procedure is an anterior C2-C3 diskectomy and fusion, because of the lower morbidity of the anterior approach and the motion preservation between C1 and C2. In rare cases (irreducible locked facet joints, the necessity of decompression of the vertebral artery, contraindication for anterior approach), a posterior approach is sometimes necessary. Isolated direct screw osteosynthesis is of little value, because it only makes sense in cases with an intact C2-C3 disk, which is usually regarded as stable and therefore might be treated conservatively. Conclusions Overall, the clinical evidence regarding traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis is very low and mainly based on small case series, expert opinion, laboratory findings, and theoretical considerations.

Predictors of Vertebral Artery Injury in Isolated C2 Fractures Based on Fracture Morphology Using CT Angiography

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine C2 fracture patterns associated with vertebral artery injury (VAI) as assessed by computed tomography angiography.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The incidence of C2 fracture hospitalizations has increased significantly in the last decade. The vertebral arteries are susceptible to injury as each courses through the C2 transverse foramen. Early screening for VAI to institute antithrombotic treatment is critical to prevent ischemic neurological sequelae. Imaging-based fracture classification schemes to determine which patterns are predictors of VAI in isolated C2 fractures using computed tomography angiography have not been described.

METHODS

Cervical spine computed tomographic (CT) scans at a level I trauma center were reviewed for isolated C2 fractures from 2004 to 2014 under institutional board review approval. Exclusion criteria included penetrating injury or additional cervical/occipital fractures. Fractures were classified using multiplanar CT scans into type I/II/IIa/III spondylolisthesis, type I/IIA/IIB/IIC/III dens, transverse foramen (displacement/comminution/intraforaminal fragments), and miscellaneous vertebral body fractures. Corresponding CT angiograms were assessed for VAI on the basis of the Denver grading criteria. Fisher exact test and Student t test were performed to determine predictors of VAI on the basis of fracture type.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Fracture pattern analysis revealed that the majority were dens fractures (50.8%) and traumatic spondylolisthesis (41.8%); 29.9% had miscellaneous coronal/sagittal fractures and 22.4% were a combination.VAI was identified in 37.3% of patients with isolated C2 fractures, and 88% of patients had transverse foramen involvement. Fracture patterns significantly associated with VAI were type III dens and transverse foramen fractures with intraforaminal fragments, with or without comminution.

CONCLUSION

The C2 fracture pattern most associated with VAI was comminuted transverse foramen fracture with intraforaminal fragments. Transverse foramen fracture alone was not found to be significant. These results help stratify patients with isolated C2 fractures who are at high VAI risk and should be further evaluated with computed tomography angiography.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Does CT Angiography Matter for Patients with Cervical Spine Injuries?

BACKGROUND

Cervical injury can be associated with vertebral artery injury. This study was performed to determine the impact of computed tomography (CT) angiography of the head and neck on planning treatment of cervical spine fracture, if these tests were ordered appropriately, and to estimate cost and associated exposure to radiation and contrast medium.

METHODS

This retrospective review included all patients who underwent CT of the cervical spine and CT angiography of the head and neck from January 2010 to August 2011 at one institution. Patients were divided into those with and those without cervical spine fracture seen on CT of the cervical spine. We determined if the CT angiography of the head and neck was positive for vascular injury in the patients with a cervical fracture. Vascular injury treatment and alterations in surgical fracture treatment due to positive CT angiography of the head and neck were recorded. A scan was deemed appropriate if it had been ordered per established institutional protocol.

RESULTS

Of the 381 patients who underwent CT angiography of the head and neck, 126 had a cervical injury. Sixteen of the CT angiography studies were appropriately ordered for non-spinal indications, and twenty-three were inappropriately ordered. The CT angiography was positive for one patient for whom the imaging was off protocol and one for whom the indication was non-spinal. Nineteen patients had positive CT angiography of the head and neck; no patient underwent surgical intervention for a vascular lesion. Eleven patients underwent surgical intervention for a cervical fracture; the operative plan was changed because of vascular injury in one case. The CT angiography was positive for eleven of forty-eight patients who had sustained a C2 fracture; this group accounted for eleven of the nineteen positive CT angiography studies. Noncontiguous injuries occurred in nineteen patients; three had positive CT angiography of the head and neck. The approximate charge for the CT angiography was $3925, radiation exposure was approximately 4000 mGy/cm, and contrast-medium load was approximately 100 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive CT angiography of the head and neck rarely altered surgical treatment of cervical spine injuries. This study supports the findings in the literature that C1-C3 spine injuries have an increased association with vertebral artery injury. CT angiography of the head and neck ordered off protocol had a low likelihood of being positive. Strict adherence to protocols for CT angiography of the head and neck can reduce costs and decrease unnecessary exposure to radiation and contrast medium.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Vertebral artery injury and severely displaced odontoid fracture: the case for early reduction

PURPOSE

To report a novel treatment method for vertebral artery occlusion. Vertebral artery injuries have a high association with specific cervical fractures including atlanto-axial fractures, displaced fracture patterns, and transverse foramen fractures. Optimal medical management of the occluded vertebral artery has yet to be determined; however, there is an extremely high complication rate with systemic anticoagulation in these patients. Furthermore, unlike appendicular skeleton fracture-dislocations with vascular injury, there is no clear consensus as to the optimal acute management of the displaced odontoid fracture with or without vertebral artery injury.

METHODS

We report on a severely displaced odontoid fracture that was found to have a vertebral artery injury. Medical records and imaging were reviewed.

RESULTS

An 82-year-old female presented to our hospital with a type IIb odontoid fracture after sustaining a ground-level fall. Pertinent physical exam findings were ecchymosis on the left side of her forehead and posterior cervical pain without neurologic deficits. An MRA showed an occluded left vertebral artery. The patient was placed in early cervical traction and the fracture was reduced within 12 h of presentation. Following surgical stabilization, an MR angiogram showed complete reperfusion of the vertebral artery without intimal tear.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a displaced odontoid fracture in which cervical traction was used to restore the perfusion of the vertebral artery. Cervical traction may obviate the need for systemic anticoagulation and should be considered in patients who have an identifiable compression of the vertebral artery even if neurologically intact.

Clinical identifiers for detecting underlying closed cervical fractures

BACKGROUND

Although uncommon, closed cervical fractures (CCFs) may present in orthopedic clinical settings despite previous workup. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics associated with missed CCF.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective database exploration of a cohort of subjects within a department of surgery with cervical pain. The sample consisted of 162 patients seen for a surgical consult for a number of cervical conditions. The examination time frame represented a clinical examination and imaging confirmation of diagnosis after an original initial visit by another provider. Descriptive and diagnostic accuracy values including sensitivity/specificity and positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR-) were calculated for each targeted variable. Clustered analyses were calculated using the patient history and situational characteristics.

RESULTS

Eleven patients in the sample were diagnosed with CCF (6.7%). Six variables were significantly associated with a missed CCF. Using these six variables, it was found that failure to exhibit a condition of 2 of the 6 variables (1 or fewer) was the strongest in ruling out the condition (LR- = 0.0; post-test probability with a negative finding = 0%), whereas a finding of 4 of 6 was the most diagnostic for ruling in the condition (LR+ = 32; post-test probability with a positive finding = 70%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in this sample suggest that select patient history or situational factors are still useful even after initial examination and clinicians must stay vigilant because CCFs may be missed during emergent care screens.