Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: is it safe?

Effects of Anesthetic Choice on the Incidence of Transcranial-Motor Potential-Induced Oral Trauma

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) play an integral role in assessing motor tract function in surgical procedures where motor function is at risk. However, transcranial stimulation creates a risk for oral trauma. Several studies have reported on distinct factors that can influence the rate of TcMEP-induced oral trauma, but little is known about how an anesthetic regimen can influence this rate. In this retrospective review, we investigated the incidence of oral injury under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia in 66,166 cases from 2019 to 2021. There were 295 oral injuries in our sample, yielding an incidence of 0.45%, which is in line with ranges reported in the literature. A total of 222 of the injured patients were sedated with balanced anesthesia, while the remaining 73 were under TIVA anesthetics. This difference in distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Our findings suggest TIVA is associated with lower risk of oral trauma when TcMEPs are monitored, thereby improving patient safety.

Intraoperative Monitoring of Scoliosis Surgery in Young Patients

SUMMARY

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has added substantially to the safety of spinal deformity surgery correction since its introduction over four decades ago. Monitoring routinely includes both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials. Either modality alone will detect almost all instances of spinal cord injury during deformity correction. The combined use of the two modalities provides complementary information, can permit more rapidly identification of problems, and enhances safety though parallel redundancy should one modality fail. Both techniques are well established and continue to be refined. Although there is room for provider preference, proper monitoring requires attention to technical detail, understanding of the underlying physiology, and familiarity with effects of commonly used anesthetic agents.

Factors Affecting Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Measurements Using Single-Train Stimulation with an Increased Number of Pulses during Adolescent Scoliosis Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

Measurement of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during scoliosis surgery helps detect postoperative new neurological defects. However, TcMEP interpretation is difficult owing to the influence of intraoperative physiological, pharmacological, and time-related factors as well as stimulation conditions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of the abovementioned factors on TcMEP amplitude using single-train stimulation with an increased number of pulses (STS-INP) during adolescent scoliosis surgery; moreover, we evaluated the complications of TcMEP measurement. We included 50 patients and 706 TcMEP measurements. A total of 1412 TcMEP waveforms were analyzed, each on the bilateral abductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior, and abductor hallucis muscles. We estimated the mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) and predicted mean difference (95% CI) evaluated using the interquartile range of each factor, based on a mixed-effect model with random intercepts for TcMEP amplitude. The predicted mean differences in TcMEP amplitude were clinically small compared with the actual TcMEP amplitude, suggesting that each factor had a limited effect on TcMEP amplitude. No intraoperative bite injuries or seizures were observed. Using STS-INP during adolescent scoliosis surgery may enable accurate measurement of TcMEP amplitude with neither complications nor the influence of various intraoperative factors.

Current Trends in Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring: A Survey Analysis among Japanese Expert Spine Surgeons

Introduction

Although intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) is recommended for spine surgeries, there are no guidelines regarding its use in Japan, and its usage is mainly based on the surgeon's preferences. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the current trends in IONM usage in Japan.

Methods

In this web-based survey, expert spine surgeons belonging to the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding IONM management. The questionnaire covered various aspects of IONM usage, including the preferred modality, operation of IONM, details regarding muscle-evoked potential after electrical stimulation of the brain (Br(E)-MsEP), and need for consistent use of IONM in major spine surgeries.

Results

Responses were received from 134 of 186 expert spine surgeons (response rate, 72%). Of these, 124 respondents used IONM routinely. Medical staff rarely performed IONM without a medical doctor. Br(E)-MsEP was predominantly used for IONM. One-third of the respondents reported complications, such as bite injuries caused by Br(E)-MsEP. Interestingly, two-thirds of the respondents did not plan responses to alarm points. Intramedullary spinal cord tumor, scoliosis (idiopathic, congenital, or neuromuscular in pediatric), and thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were representative diseases that require IONM.

Conclusions

IONM has become an essential tool in Japan, and Br(E)-MsEP is a predominant modality for IONM at present. Although we investigated spine surgeries for which consistent use of IONM is supported, a cost-benefit analysis may be required.

Transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials for cervical spine intraoperative monitoring complications: systematic review and illustrative case of cardiac arrest

PURPOSE

We show a systematic review of known complications during intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) using transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potentials (TES-MEP) on cervical spine surgery, which provides a summary of the main findings. A rare complication during this procedure, cardiac arrest by cardioinhibitory reflex, is also described.

METHODS

Findings of 523 scientific papers published from 1995 onwards were reviewed in the following databases: CENTRAL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, Ovid, LILACS, PubMed, and Web of Science. This study evaluated only complications on cervical spine surgery undergoing TES-MEP IONM.

RESULTS

The review of the literature yielded 13 studies on the complications of TES-MEP IONM, from which three were excluded. Five studies are case series; the rest are case reports. Overall, 169 complications on 167 patients were reported in a total of 38,915 patients, a global prevalence of 0.43%. The most common complication was tongue-bite in 129 cases, (76.3% of all complication events). Tongue-bite had a prevalence of 0.33% (CI 95%, 0.28-0.39%) in all patients on TES-MEP IONM. A relatively low prevalence of severe complications was found: cardiac-arrhythmia, bradycardia and seizure, the prevalence of this complications represents only one case in all the sample. Alongside, we report the occurrence of cardiac arrest attributable to TES-MEP IONM.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review shows that TES-MEP is a safe procedure with a very low prevalence of complications. To our best knowledge, asystole is reported for the first time as a complication during TES-MEP IONM.

Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring in Patients with Cochlear Implant Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Case Report

CASE

Transcranial electric stimulation motor-evoked potentials (tcMEPs) are the most sensitive technique in multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) for posterior spinal fusion (PSF). The presence of a cochlear implant (CI) is considered a contraindication to IONM because of theoretical risk of implant device and local tissue damage from voltages induced by tcMEPs. We present the case of a 10-year-old girl with CI who underwent successful PSF with tcMEP and monopolar electrocautery (MoEC) without perioperative complications or CI damage.

CONCLUSION

With proper precautions, such as MoEC usage at a minimal voltage, motor-evoked potential monitoring can be safely performed in pediatric patients with CI undergoing PSF.

Effect of reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade on the amplitude of motor evoked potentials: a randomized controlled crossover study comparing sugammadex and placebo

PURPOSE

To compare the amplitude changes in motor evoked potentials (MEP) with reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade using sugammadex or placebo in patients with cervical myelopathy.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, 38 patients with cervical myelopathy undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion were randomized to either sugammadex (2mg/kg) or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the increase in amplitude of the MEP in the first dorsal interossei (FDI) muscle at 3 min. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the amplitude of MEP at 3 min with sugammadex when compared to placebo group. The median (IQR) increase in MEP amplitude (μV) at 3 min from the left FDI in sugammadex and placebo group was 652.9 (142:1650) and 20.6 (-183.5:297.5) (p <0.001), respectively. Corresponding values from right FDI were 2153.4 (1400:4536.8) and 55(-65.2:480.8) (p=<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that there was a 200% increase in the MEP amplitude in the first dorsal interosseous muscle at 3 min following reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex. By ensuring that maximal MEP amplitude is recorded at baseline, early commencement of neuromonitoring can be achieved.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION

The study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov , ID NCT03087513, Feb 5^th 2018.

Cautionary findings for motor evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery after a single administration of rocuronium to facilitate tracheal intubation

Administration of rocuronium to facilitate intubation has traditionally been regarded as acceptable for intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring because of sufficiently rapid spontaneous neuromuscular blockade recovery. We hypothesized that residual neuromuscular blockade, in an amount that could hinder optimal neuromonitoring in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm clipping, was still present at dural opening. We sought to identify how often this was occurring and to identify factors which may contribute to prolonged blockade. Records of 97 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Rocuronium was administered to facilitate intubation with no additional neuromuscular blockade given. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.75 after rocuronium administration was defined as 120 min, which was approximately when dural opening and the setting of baseline MEPs were occurring. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors related to prolonged spontaneous recovery time. Prolonged spontaneous recovery time to a TOF ratio of 0.75 was observed in 44.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis showed that only the dosage of rocuronium based on ideal body weight had a positive correlation with prolonged spontaneous recovery time (P = 0.01). There was no significant association between dosage of rocuronium based on total body weight, age, sex, or body temperature and prolonged recovery time. This study demonstrates that the duration of relaxation for MEP monitoring purposes is well-beyond the routinely recognized clinical duration of rocuronium. Residual neuromuscular blockade could result in lower amplitude MEP signals and/or lead to higher required MEP stimulus intensities which can both compromise monitoring sensitivity.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring in spine deformity surgery: modalities, advantages, limitations, medicolegal issues - surgeons' views

In spine deformity surgery, iatrogenic neurologic injuries might occur due to the mechanical force applied to the spinal cord from implants, instruments, and bony structures, or due to ischemic changes from vessel ligation during exposure and cord distraction/compression during corrective manoeuvres.

Prompt reaction within the reversible phase (reducing of compressive/distractive forces) usually restores functionality of the spinal cord, but if those forces continue to persist, a permanent neurological deficit might be expected.

With monitoring of sensory pathways (dorsal column–medial lemniscus) by somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs), such events are detected with a sensitivity of up to 92%, and a specificity of up to 100%.

The monitoring of motor pathways by transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (TceMEPs) has a sensitivity and a specificity of up to 100%, but it requires avoidance of halogenated anaesthetics and neuromuscular blockades.

Different modalities of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM: SSEP, TceMEP, or combined) can be performed by the neurophysiologist, the technician or the surgeon. Combined SSEP/TceMEP performed by the neurophysiologist in the operating room is the preferable method of IONM, but it might be impractical or unaffordable in many institutions. Still, many spine deformity surgeries worldwide are performed without any type of IONM. Medicolegal aspects of IONM are different worldwide and in many cases some vagueness remains.

The type of IONM that a spinal surgeon employs should be reliable, affordable, practical, and recognized by the medicolegal guidelines.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:9-16. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180032

Adverse Events Related to Transcranial Electric Stimulation for Motor-evoked Potential Monitoring in High-risk Spinal Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to study the incidence of nonneurologic adverse events related to transcranial electric stimulation (TES) for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring (IOM) with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) (Tc(E)- MEPs) and determine the need for safety precautions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Tc(E)-MEPs monitoring requires high-voltage multipulse TES that causes widespread muscle contraction and movement. Improved awareness of TES-induced movement-related adverse events is needed.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 2643 patients who underwent high-risk spinal surgery with intraoperative Tc(E)-MEPs at 11 spinal centers from 2010 to 2016. Information about neurologic and non-neurologic postoperative complications was collected, including type of surgical procedure, operative time, estimated blood loss, and treatment for postoperative adverse events.

RESULTS

A 70% drop in Tc(E)-MEPs amplitude, which was the alarm criterion to interrupt surgery, predicted postoperative motor deficits with 93.5% sensitivity, 91.0% specificity, a false-positive rate of 8.2%, and a false-negative rate of 0.3%. Non-neurologic adverse events developed in 17 (0.64%) patients and were most commonly because of bite injuries (0.57%), including 11 cases of tongue laceration, two cases of lip laceration, and two cases of tooth breakage. Four (0.15%) tongue lacerations required surgical repair with sutures and two tooth breakages required dental treatment. One patient had hair loss corresponding to the TES site. One patient, who underwent additional IOM with transpharyngeal stimulation, had severe nasal hemorrhage following electrode placement by nasal route, which resolved spontaneously. Non-neurologic adverse events did not significantly affect the accuracy of IOM assessment. Neither operative times nor blood loss significantly influenced the occurrence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

During TES-IOM, both the surgeon and monitoring team must consider the possibility-although rare-of non-neurologic adverse events, particularly bite injuries. Such complications can be minimized by using a soft bite-block and frequently evaluating the intraoral integrity of the anesthetized patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Intraoperative use of transcranial motor/sensory evoked potential monitoring in the clipping of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of false-positive and false-negative cases

OBJECTIVE

Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (SEPs and MEPs) are often used to prevent ischemic complications during aneurysm surgeries. However, surgeons often encounter cases with suspicious false-positive and false-negative results from intraoperative evoked potential (EP) monitoring, but the incidence and possible causes for these results are not well established. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and reliability of EP monitoring in the microsurgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms by evaluating false-positive and false-negative cases.

METHODS

From January 2012 to April 2016, 1514 patients underwent surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) with EP monitoring at the authors' institution. An EP amplitude decrease of 50% or greater compared with the baseline amplitude was defined as a significant EP change. Correlations between immediate postoperative motor weakness and EP monitoring results were retrospectively reviewed. The authors calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of intraoperative MEP monitoring, as well as the incidence of false-positive and false-negative results.

RESULTS

Eighteen (1.19%) of the 1514 patients had a symptomatic infarction, and 4 (0.26%) had a symptomatic hemorrhage. A total of 15 patients showed motor weakness, with the weakness detected on the immediate postoperative motor function test in 10 of these cases. Fifteen false-positive cases (0.99%) and 8 false-negative cases (0.53%) were reported. Therefore, MEP during UIA surgery resulted in a sensitivity of 0.10, specificity of 0.94, positive predictive value of 0.01, and negative predictive value of 0.99.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative EP monitoring has high specificity and negative predictive value. Both false-positive and false-negative findings were present. However, it is likely that a more meticulously designed protocol will make EP monitoring a better surrogate indicator of possible ischemic neurological deficits.

Spinal Surgery With Electrically Evoked Potential Monitoring and Monopolar Electrocautery: Is Prior Removal of a Cochlear Implant Necessary?

: Transcranial electric stimulation to generate motor evoked potentials in lower limb muscles is the standard technique used to monitor spinal cord efferent pathways during surgical correction for spinal deformities. Monopolar electrical cauterization is also used by default in the thoracic and lumbar area of the spine during this kind of surgery to prevent major blood loss. Owing to the high levels of current used, both techniques are considered contraindicative if the patient has a cochlear implant (CI). Here, we present a CI patient who underwent corrective spinal fusion surgery for a severe kyphoscoliotic spinal deformity on whom both techniques were used without any negative effects on the CI function. A major improvement in sagittal body balance was achieved with no loss in implant-aided hearing levels. These results add to reports that CI manufactures should review their evidence underlying recommendations that transcranial electric stimulation and upper thoracic monopolar electrical cauterization are high risk for CI users, possibly initiating verification studies.

Bite injuries caused by transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials' monitoring: incidence, associated factors, and clinical course

PURPOSE

The incidence of bite injuries associated with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials monitoring reportedly ranges from 0.13 to 0.19%. However, in clinical practice, bite injuries appear to occur more frequently than previously reported. Our aim was to identify the incidence of and perioperative risk factors associated with bite injuries caused by transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective surgery with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring at a single tertiary hospital in Japan between June 2017 and December 2017 were included in this study. All patients were assessed by oral surgeons preoperatively and postoperatively. The associated factors with bite injuries were explored by the univariate analysis.

RESULTS

12 of 186 patients experienced 13 bite injuries, including three lip, six oral mucosa, and four tongue injuries. No patient required suture repair. 11 of 12 patients had uneventful postoperative courses and were cured within 12 postoperative days. One patient with a tongue ulcer and a hematoma had difficulty in oral intake and persistent dysgeusia. Patient severe movement during transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring was associated with bite injuries (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bite injuries assessed by oral surgeons was 6.5% in patients with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring, and the patients with severe movement during the monitoring tended to incur bite injuries. In rare cases, transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring may cause difficulty in oral intake and dysgeusia.

Utility of intraoperative monitoring with motor-evoked potential during the surgical enucleation of peripheral nerve schwannoma

Although it is thought that the surgical enucleation of schwannomas can be easily performed, certain patients present with postoperative neurological symptoms. The present study examined the utility of intraoperative motor-evoked potential (MEP) in predicting neurological deficits following the surgical enucleation of peripheral nerve schwannoma. The current study included 23 patients and MEP was performed using transcranial electrical stimulation. In three cases, the MEP decreased to <50% of the preoperative value; however, in two cases that involved the peroneal nerve and tibial nerve, results appeared to be false positives induced by a tourniquet during surgery. In another case, the MEP was completely lost following enucleation of the tumor from the sciatic nerve, which recovered to 61% of the original MEP within 10 min. This patient presented with common peroneal palsy postoperatively. By contrast, another case involving the lumbar nerve root and in which there was reversible postoperative motor loss, the MEP did not change intraoperatively. Postoperative neurological deficit occurred in 22% of patients in the present study, which is similar to that of previous reports. The present study also demonstrated that even if a nerve is not transected or injured, traction or compression of a peripheral nerve may induce ischemia, which can be monitored using MEP. Although MEP alone was not able to predict postoperative transient sensory or motor deficits, the combination of MEP with other methods of neurological monitoring may improve accuracy and should be investigated in future studies.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring is a reliable tool for detecting intraoperative spine injury and is recommended during surgery for degenerative cervical myopathy (DCM). Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) can be used to monitor spine and peripheral nerve injury during positioning in surgery for DCM. Compensation technique for transcranial evoked muscle action potentials (tcMEPs) should be adopted in intraoperative monitoring during surgery for DCM. Free-running electromyography is a useful real-time monitoring add-on modality in addition to SEP and tcMEP.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring alerts in a pediatric deformity center

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) involves the use of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (TceMEPs). In this retrospective study the authors examined the sensitivity and specificity of both SSEPs and TceMEPs during pediatric spinal deformity surgeries.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective quantitative analysis of data obtained in 806 patients (197 males and 609 females) treated from December 2011 until October 2015. All patients were diagnosed with scoliosis that was classified as one of the following: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) (38%), congenital scoliosis (22%), or syndromic scoliosis (40%). Also, 53 patients underwent vertebral column resection (VCR). All surgeries were monitored by high-level neuromonitoring specialists and were performed with total intravenous anesthesia. Alerts were described as a decrease in amplitude by 50% or greater (bilateral or unilateral) in SSEPs, TceMEPs, or both.

RESULTS

True-positive alerts for TceMEPs were observed in 60 of the 806 patients (7.4%). True-positive alerts for SSEPs were observed in 7 of the 806 patients (0.9%). In contrast, there were no false-positive or false-negative outcomes. Only 1 case (0.1%) was reported with a permanent postoperative deficit. No reported false negatives or false positives were observed, and thus sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 93%–100% for TceMEPs. The rate of sensitivity was 13.2% and the rate of specificity was 100% for SSEPs. The breakdown of total alert was as follows: 6.6% in AIS cases, 24.5% in congenital scoliosis cases, and 10.2% in syndromic scoliosis cases. Neurological injury rates were significantly lower than in previous studies, as there were 0% for AIS cases (p = 0.12), 0.6% for congenital scoliosis cases (p = 0.17), and 0% for syndromic scoliosis cases (p = 0.07). One injury in a patient with congenital scoliosis occurred during a VCR procedure, which brought the injury rate to 1.9% (p < 0.005). IONM alerts occurred during 34% of rod/correction cases, 25% of thoracic screw placements, 20% of the osteotomies, 17% of the resections, 3% of the cage insertions, and 2% of the sublaminar wiring procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors hypothesize that the results of this study will support the necessity, as a standard of care, of multimodality neuromonitoring during high-risk pediatric spinal deformity surgery because of the decrease in postoperative deficits. Their data suggest that the TceMEPs are more sensitive than SSEPs, but when used in combination, they offer the patient a level of safety that would otherwise not exist. Last, these findings support the notion that better outcomes are achieved with high-level IONM professionals.

A multi-train electrical stimulation protocol facilitates transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials and increases induction rate and reproducibility even in patients with preoperative neurological deficits

This study sought to evaluate the facilitation effect of repetitive multi-train transcranial electrical stimulation (mt-TES) at 2 repetition rates on transcranial electrical motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) monitoring during spinal surgery, and to assess the induction rate in patients with impaired motor function from a compromised spinal cord or spinal nerve. We studied 32 consecutive patients with impaired motor function undergoing cervical or thoracic spinal surgery (470 muscles). A series of 10 TESs with 5 pulse trains were preoperatively delivered at 2 repetition rates (1 and 5 Hz). All peak-topeak amplitudes of the MEPs of the upper and lower extremity muscles elicited by the 10 TESs were measured. The induction rates of the lower extremity muscles were also assessed with muscle and preoperative lower extremity motor function scores. In each of the muscles, MEP amplitudes were augmented by about 2-3 times at 1 Hz and 5-6 times at 5 Hz. Under the 5-Hz condition, all limb muscles showed significant amplification. Also, in all preoperative motor function score groups, the amplitudes and induction rates of the lower extremity muscles were significantly increased. Moreover, the facilitation effects tended to peak in the last half of the series of 10 TESs. In all score groups of patients with preoperative neurological deficits, repetitive mt-TES delivered at a frequency of 5 Hz markedly facilitated the MEPs of all limb muscles and increased the induction rate. We recommend this method to improve the reliability of intraoperative monitoring during spinal surgery.

Incidence of intraoperative seizures during motor evoked potential monitoring in a large cohort of patients undergoing different surgical procedures

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of seizures during the intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by electrical brain stimulation in a wide spectrum of surgeries such as those of the orthopedic spine, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves, interventional radiology procedures, and craniotomies for supra- and infratentorial tumors and vascular lesions.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed data from 4179 consecutive patients who underwent surgery or an interventional radiology procedure with MEP monitoring.

RESULTS

Of 4179 patients, only 32 (0.8%) had 1 or more intraoperative seizures. The incidence of seizures in cranial procedures, including craniotomies and interventional neuroradiology, was 1.8%. In craniotomies in which transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) was applied to elicit MEPs, the incidence of seizures was 0.7% (6/850). When direct cortical stimulation was additionally applied, the incidence of seizures increased to 5.4% (23/422). Patients undergoing craniotomies for the excision of extraaxial brain tumors, particularly meningiomas (15 patients), exhibited the highest risk of developing an intraoperative seizure (16 patients). The incidence of seizures in orthopedic spine surgeries was 0.2% (3/1664). None of the patients who underwent surgery for conditions of the spinal cord, neck, or peripheral nerves or who underwent cranial or noncranial interventional radiology procedures had intraoperative seizures elicited by TES during MEP monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

In this largest such study to date, the authors report the incidence of intraoperative seizures in patients who underwent MEP monitoring during a wide spectrum of surgeries such as those of the orthopedic spine, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves, interventional radiology procedures, and craniotomies for supra- and infratentorial tumors and vascular lesions. The low incidence of seizures induced by electrical brain stimulation, particularly short-train TES, demonstrates that MEP monitoring is a safe technique that should not be avoided due to the risk of inducing seizures.

Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials during Spinal Deformity Corrections-Safety, Efficacy, Limitations, and the Role of a Checklist

Introduction

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has become a standard of care in spinal deformity surgeries to minimize the incidence of new onset neurological deficit. Stagnara wake up test and ankle clonus test are the oldest techniques described for spinal cord monitoring, but they cannot be solely relied upon as a neuromonitoring modality. Somatosensory evoked potentials monitor only dorsal tracts and give high false positive and negative alerts. Transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) monitor the more useful motor pathways. The purpose of our study was to report the safety, efficacy, limitations of TcMEPs in spine deformity surgeries, and the role of a checklist.

Study design

Retrospective review of all spinal deformity surgeries performed with TcMEPs from 2011 to 2015.

Materials and methods

All patients were subjected to IONM by TcMEPs during the spinal deformity surgery. Patients were included in the study only if complete operative reports and neuromonitoring data and postoperative neurological data were available for review. An alert was defined as 80% or more decrement in the motor evoked potential amplitude, or increase in threshold of 100 V or more from baseline. The systemic and surgical causes of IONM alerts and the postoperative neurological status were recorded.

Results

In total, 61 patients underwent surgery for spinal deformities with TcMEPs. The average age was 12.6 years (6–36 years) and male:female ratio was 1:1.3. Diagnoses included idiopathic scoliosis (n = 35), congenital scoliosis (n = 13), congenital kyphosis (n = 7), congenital kyphoscoliosis (n = 4), post-infectious kyphosis (n = 1), and post-traumatic kyphosis (n = 1). The average kyphosis was 72° (45°–101°) and the average scoliosis was 84° (62°–128°). There were in total 33 alerts in 22 patients (36%). The most common causes were hypotension (n = 7), drug induced (n = 5), deformity correction (n = 5), osteotomies (n = 3), tachycardia (n = 1), screw placement (n = 2), and electrodes disconnection (n = 1). Reversal of the inciting event cause resulted in complete reversal of the alert in 90% of the times. Three patients showed persistent alerts, out of whom one had a positive wake up test and woke up with neurodeficit, which recovered over few weeks, while the other patients showed persistent alerts but woke up without any deficit. Sensitivity and specificity of TcMEP in deformity correction surgery were 100 and 96.6%, respectively, in our study.

Conclusion

IONM alerts are frequent during spinal deformity surgery. In our study, more than 50% of the alerts were associated with anesthetic management. IONM with TcMEPs is a safe and effective monitoring technique and wake up test still remains a valuable tool in cases of a persistent alert.

What's New in the Management of Neuromuscular Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) can pose treatment challenges related to medical comorbidities and altered spinopelvic anatomy. We reviewed the recent literature regarding evaluation and management of NMS patients and explored areas where further research is needed.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for all papers related to the treatment of NMS published from January 1, 2011 through July 31, 2014, yielding 70 papers.

RESULTS

A total of 39 papers contributed compelling new findings. Steroid treatment has been most promising in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, leading to a significantly lower death rate, better pulmonary function, and longer independent ambulation. Growing rods in early-onset NMS were shown to result in significant improvements in major Cobb angles and pelvic obliquity, with low complication rates in patients with spinal muscular atrophy but high infection rates in those with cerebral palsy. Early reports of magnetic growing rods in NMS patients are favorable. Intraoperative neural monitoring is variable in this patient population; however, use of transcranial motor-evoked potentials in NMS patients seems to be safe. Blood loss is the highest in NMS patients when compared with all other diagnostic categories. However, tranexamic acid seems to significantly lower intraoperative blood loss. In a multicenter study, patients diagnosed with NMS had the highest surgical-site infection rate at 13.1%. Best-practice guidelines have been created regarding prevention of infection in NMS patients. Preoperative nutritional optimization and postoperative nutritional supplementation seem to help with lowering the infection rate in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been major advances in the management of NMS patients, but many challenges remain. Further multicenter studies and randomized clinical trials are needed, particularly in the areas of infection prophylaxis, nutritional optimization, improvement in intraoperative neural monitoring, and prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4-literature review.

Rare true-positive outcome of spinal cord monitoring in patients under age 4 years

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is becoming an essential component in spinal surgery, but there are many different viewpoints about it in patients under age 4 years.

PURPOSE

This study aims to report some IOM features in children under age 4 years.

DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective cases study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 37 children (35.76 months±1.47) and 120 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS, 14.2 years) were recruited between September 2012 and December 2014.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Relevant monitoring changes were identified as transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) or somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) loss associated with high-risk surgical maneuvers.

METHODS

Motor evoked potential, SEP, and free-run electromyography (free-run EMG) were used for IOM. The IOM parameters (amplitude, latency, and waveform) and monitoring outcomes (signal changes, true positive, and false positive) were mainly analyzed in the patients under age 4 years.

RESULTS

All young patients presented stable MEP (90.6 µV±20.3) and SEP (1.01 µV±0.3) baseline. The baseline success rate (100%) was the same as that in patients with AIS; however, the MEP amplitude of young patients was significantly lower than that of patients with AIS (90.6 µV±20.3 vs. 312.1 µV±25.2, n=120; **p<.01) under the same stimulus parameters. Moreover, children under age 4 years have more monitoring changes (18.9%, 7 of 37), but true-positive findings are rare (0%) in our population.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative monitoring baseline can be obtained satisfactorily in children under age 4 years, but true-positive findings are rare; meanwhile, low MEP amplitude and poor waveforms are common.

A novel mouthpiece prevents bite injuries caused by intraoperative transcranial electric motor-evoked potential monitoring

PURPOSE

Intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring causes contraction of the masseter muscles, which may cause injuries to the oral cavity and damage to the orotracheal tube. We developed a mouthpiece made from vinyl-silicone impression material to prevent these injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients undergoing spinal surgery under transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring were fitted with bespoke vinyl-silicone mouthpieces by dentists before surgery. On induction of general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation, the mouthpiece was attached to the upper and lower dental arches. A lateral cervical X-ray was taken at the end of surgery to examine the condition of the orotracheal tube. The incidence of endotracheal tube deformation was compared with an historic control group of 20 patients in whom a conventional gauze bite block had been previously used before induction of the mouthpiece. The oral cavity was examined by a dentist the day before surgery and 3 days postoperatively, and intraoral injuries were recorded.

RESULTS

No endotracheal tube deformation was found in 22 patients fitted with the new mouthpiece. The incidence of tube deformation (none of 22 patients, 0 %) was significantly lower than in those who had been fitted with the gauze bite block (9 of 20 patients, 45.0 %; p < 0.001). Application of the mouthpiece resulted in no tongue or tooth injuries.

CONCLUSION

A novel mouthpiece reduced the incidence of damage to the endotracheal tube caused by intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring.

Movement Along the Spine Induced by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Related Electrode Positioning

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, nonrandomized cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a technique quantifying movement induced by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) induced movement in relation to the positioning of electrodes during spinal deformity surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

TES induced movement may cause injuries and delay surgical procedures. When TES movements are evoked, muscles other than those being monitored any adjustments in stimulation protocols and electrode positioning may be expected to minimize movement whereas preserving quality of monitoring. In this study, seismic evoked responses (SER) induced through TES were studied at different electrode positions.

METHODS

Intraoperative TES-motor evoked potentials were carried out in 12 patients undergoing corrective spine surgery. Accelerometer transducers recorded SER in two directions at four different locations of the spine for TES-electrode montage groups Cz-Fz and C3-C4. A paired t test was used to compare the means of SER and the relationship between movement and TES electrode positioning.

RESULTS

SERs were strongest in the upper body. All mean SERs values for the Cz-Fz group were up to five times larger when compared with the C3-C4 group. However, there were no differences between the C3-C4 and Cz-Fz groups in the lower body locations. Both electrode montage groups showed a gradual stepwise reduction in all mean SER values along the spine from the cranial to caudal region. For the upper body locations, there were no significant associations between SER and both montages; in contrast, a significant association SER was demonstrated in the lumbar region.

CONCLUSION

At supramaximum levels, movements resulting from multipulse TES are likely caused by relatively strong contractions from muscles in the neck resulting from direct extracranial stimulation. When interchanging electrode montages in individual cases, the movement in the neck may become reduced. At lumbar levels transcranial evoked muscle contractions dominate movement in the surgically exposed areas.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Spinal fusion for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis: national trends, complications, and in-hospital outcomes

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine if the recent changes in technology, surgical techniques, and surgical literature have influenced practice trends in spinal fusion surgery for pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS). In this study the authors analyzed recent trends in the surgical management of NMS and investigated the effect of various patient and surgical factors on in-hospital complications, outcomes, and costs, using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. METHODS The NIS was queried from 2002 to 2011 using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification codes to identify pediatric cases (age < 18 years) of spinal fusion for NMS. Several patient, surgical, and short-term outcome factors were included in the analyses. Trend analyses of these factors were conducted. Both univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine the effect of the various patient and surgical factors on short-term outcomes. RESULTS Between 2002 and 2011, a total of 2154 NMS fusion cases were identified, and the volume of spinal fusion procedures increased 93% from 148 in 2002 to 286 in 2011 (p < 0.0001). The mean patient age was 12.8 ± 3.10 years, and 45.6% of the study population was female. The overall complication rate was 40.1% and the respiratory complication rate was 28.2%. From 2002 to 2011, upward trends (p < 0.0001) were demonstrated in Medicaid insurance status (36.5% to 52.8%), presence of ≥ 1 comorbidity (40.2% to 52.1%), and blood transfusions (25.2% to 57.3%). Utilization of posterior-only fusions (PSFs) increased from 66.2% to 90.2% (p < 0.0001) while combined anterior release/fusions and PSF (AR/PSF) decreased from 33.8% to 9.8% (< 0.0001). Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) underwent increasing utilization from 2009 to 2011 (15.5% to 20.3%, p < 0.0001). The use/harvest of autograft underwent a significant upward trend between 2002 and 2011 (31.3% to 59.8%, p < 0.0001). In univariate analysis, IONM use was associated with decreased complications (40.7% to 33.1%, p = 0.049) and length of stay (LOS; 9.21 to 6.70 days, p <0.0001). Inflation-adjusted mean hospital costs increased nearly 75% from 2002 to 2011 ($36,805 to $65,244, p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, nonwhite race, highest quartile of median household income, greater preexisting comorbidity, long-segment fusions, and use of blood transfusions were found to increase the likelihood of complication occurrence (all p < 0.05). In further multivariable analysis, independent predictors of prolonged LOS included older age, increased preexisting comorbidity, the AR/PSF approach, and long-segment fusions (all p < 0.05). Lastly, the likelihood of increased hospital costs (at or above the 90th percentile for LOS, 14 days) was increased by older age, female sex, Medicaid insurance status, highest quartile of median household income, AR/PSF approach, long-segment fusion, and blood transfusion (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, the use of autograft was associated with a lower likelihood of complication occurrence and prolonged LOS (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Increasing use of IONM and posterior-only approaches may combat the high complication rates in NMS. The trends of increasing comorbidities, blood transfusions, and total costs in spinal fusion surgery for pediatric NMS may indicate an increasingly aggressive approach to these cases.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Skull Base: A Technical Guide

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during endoscopic, endonasal approaches to the skull base is both feasible and safe. Numerous reports have recently emerged from the literature evaluating the efficacy of different neuromonitoring tests during endonasal procedures, making them relatively well-studied. The authors report on a comprehensive, multimodality approach to monitoring the functional integrity of at risk nervous system structures, including the cerebral cortex, brainstem, cranial nerves, corticospinal tract, corticobulbar tract, and the thalamocortical somatosensory system during endonasal surgery of the skull base. The modalities employed include electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, free-running and electrically triggered electromyography, transcranial electric motor evoked potentials, and auditory evoked potentials. Methodological considerations as well as benefits and limitations are discussed. The authors argue that, while individual modalities have their limitations, multimodality neuromonitoring provides a real-time, comprehensive assessment of nervous system function and allows for safer, more aggressive management of skull base tumors via the endonasal route.

The Applicability of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Preoperative Motor Weakness during Spine Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the success rate and feasibility of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) focusing on transcranial motor evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring for patients with preoperative motor weakness in spine surgery.

METHODS

Between November 2011 and December 2013, TcMEP and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring were attempted in 130 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgeries for cervical or thoracic cord lesions. Patients ranged in age from 14 to 81 years (mean±standard deviation, 56.7±14.8 years), and 84 patients were male. The success rates of both SSEP and MEPs monitoring were assessed according to the preoperative Medical Research Council (MRC) and Nurick grades.

RESULTS

TcMEP was recorded successfully in 0%, 28.6%, 72.3%, and 100% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. SSEP was obtained from 0%, 37.5%, 21.5%, 61.4%, and 85.4% of patients with MRC grades 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. TcMEP was recorded successfully in 84% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 26% of patients with Nurick grades 4-5. SSEPs were recorded successfully in 76.3% of patients with Nurick grades 1-3 and 24% of patients with grades 4-5.

CONCLUSION

IONM during spine surgery may be useless in patients with MRC grades 1-2, applicable MRC grade 3, and useful MRC grades 4-5. MRC grade 3 is a critical point of indication for application of MEPs. In unmonitorable cases with MRC grade 3, increasing stimulus intensity or facilitation techniques may be considered to improve the usefulness of TcMEP.

Intra-operative MEP monitoring can work well in the patients with neural axis abnormality

PURPOSE

To explain the intra-operative transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring can work well in patients with neural axis abnormality (NAA).

METHODS

One hundred eighteen consecutive NAA and 334 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who underwent spinal deformity surgery between June 2010 and April 2013 in our spine center were included. The MEP data including the success rate of obtaining a baseline, amplitude, sensitivity and specificity were analyzed.

RESULTS

High-efficiency MEPs baseline could be obtained in 117/118 NAA (74 congenital scoliosis, 32 neuromuscular scoliosis, 8 adult scoliosis, 3 congenital kyphoscoliosis and 1 neurofibromatosis scoliosis) and 334 AIS cases. They had an approximate level in success rate of MEPs baseline (99.2 vs. 99.7 %) and MEPs amplitude (317 μV, n = 118; vs. 312 μV, n = 334). The sensitivity and specificity for MEP were 100 and 98.2 % in patients with NAA. And the MEPs amplitude value fitted positive-skewed distribution in both of NAA and AIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative MEP monitoring can be used accurately and satisfactorily in NAA patients and show no difference compared with AIS.

Safe transcranial electric stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring during posterior spinal fusion in two patients with cochlear implants

Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) motor evoked potentials (MEPs) have become a regular part of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) for posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery. Almost all of the relative contraindications to TES have come and gone. One exception is in the case of patients with a cochlear implant (CI). Herein we illustrate two cases of pediatric patients with CIs who underwent PSF using TES MEPs as part of IONM. In both instances the patients displayed no untoward effects from TES, and post-operatively both CIs were intact and functioning as they were prior to surgery.

Somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during instrumented scoliosis corrective procedures: validity revisited

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) plays an important role in reducing iatrogenic neurologic deficits during corrective pediatric idiopathic procedures for scoliosis. However, for unknown reasons, recent reports have cited that the sensitivity of SSEPs to detect neurologic deficits has decreased, in some to be less than 50%. This current trend, which is coincident with the addition of transcranial motor-evoked potentials, is surprising given that SSEPs are robust, reproducible responses that were previously shown to have sensitivity and specificity of >90%.

PURPOSE

Our primary aim was to assess whether SSEPs alone can detect impending neurologic deficits with similar sensitivity and specificity as originally reported. Our secondary aim was to estimate the potential predictive value of adding transcranial motor-evoked potentials to SSEP monitoring in idiopathic scoliosis procedures.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review to analyze the efficacy of SSEP monitoring in the group of pediatric instrumented scoliosis fusion cases.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive cases of patients who underwent idiopathic scoliosis surgery between 1999 and 2009 at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. We identified 477 patients who had the surgery with SSEP monitoring alone. Exclusion criteria included any patients with neuromuscular disorders or unreliable SSEP monitoring. Patients who had incomplete neurophysiology data or incomplete postoperative records were also excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Major outcomes measured were clinically significant postoperative sensory or motor deficits, as well as significant intraoperative SSEP changes.

METHODS

Continuous interleaved upper- and lower-extremity SSEPs were obtained throughout the duration of all procedures. We considered a persistent 50% reduction in primary somatosensory cortical amplitude or a prolongation of response latency by >10% from baseline to be significant. Persistent changes represent significant deviation in SSEP amplitude or latency in more than two consecutive averaged trials. Patients were classified into one of four categories with respect to SSEP monitoring: true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were then calculated accordingly.

RESULTS

Our review of 477 idiopathic scoliosis surgeries monitored using SSEPs alone revealed a new deficit rate of 0.63% with no cases of permanent injury. Sensitivity = 95.0%, specificity = 99.8%, positive predictive value = 95%, negative predictive value = 99.8%. Using evidence-based epidemiologic measures, we calculated that the number needed to treat was 1,587 patients for one intervention to be performed that would have been missed by SSEP monitoring alone. In addition, the number needed to harm, which represents the increase in false positives with the addition of transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials, was 200.

CONCLUSION

SSEP monitoring alone during idiopathic scoliosis continues to be a highly reliable method for the detection and prevention of iatrogenic injury. Our results confirm the high sensitivity and specificity of SSEP monitoring alone published in earlier literature. As such, we suggest the continued use of SSEP alone in idiopathic scoliosis surgeries. At this time we do not believe there are sufficient data to support the addition of MEP monitoring, although more studies and revised criteria for the use of MEP may provide added value for its use in the future.

Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

False-positive loss of transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (TCe-MEPs) limits the efficacy of motor tract monitoring during spine surgery. Although total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is widely regarded as the optimal regimen for TCe-MEPs, inhalational anesthesia is an alternative regimen.

PURPOSE

To compare the rates of false-positive TCe-MEPs during spine surgery for patients anesthetized with TIVA and inhalation anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of data collected from consecutive patients undergoing TCe-MEP monitoring during spinal surgery.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Consecutive adult patients from multiple surgical centers undergoing spine surgery inclusive of cervical or thoracic spinal levels during 2008-2009 who received TIVA or inhalation anesthesia.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the rate of false-positive alerts using TCe-MEPS, defined as a persistent loss of 90% or greater of the amplitude of TCe-MEP in one or more muscles not attributed to technical or transient systemic factors (hypotension or hypoxia) and not associated with any postoperative neurologic deficit.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups according to anesthetic regimen: those anesthetized with one or more inhalational agents (n=1,303) and patients anesthetized with TIVA (n=511). The Fisher exact test and unpaired t test were used to compare group characteristics and false-positive rates. Each group was further subdivided by spinal region (cervical, thoracic, and thoracolumbar) and by presence of preoperative motor deficit. A Pearson chi-squared test was used to identify differences according to spinal region. This study was not supported by any financial sources nor do the authors have any financial relationships to disclose.

RESULTS

Patient with inhaled anesthesia showed significantly higher rates of false-positive TCe-MEP changes (15.0% vs. 3.2%) compared with the TIVA group. These differences were significant across all surgical subgroups. The inhaled group had a larger number of patients with preoperative motor deficits compared with TIVA (45.0% vs. 37.4%), a potential confounder for false-positive results. However, a significantly higher rate of false-positive TCe-MEP changes was still observed in the inhaled group (11.4% vs. 0.6% for TIVA) when analyzing only those patients without preoperative motor deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of inhalation anesthesia during adult spinal surgery is associated with significantly higher rates of false-positive changes compared with TIVA during TCe-MEP monitoring. This relationship appears independent of preoperative motor status. Further study and multivariate analysis of anesthetic agents, diagnosis, and symptoms is necessary to elucidate the impact of these variables. The potential confounding effects of inhalational anesthesia on TCe-MEP monitoring should be considered when determining anesthetic regimen.

Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation–induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery

Object

Deltoid muscle weakness due to C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery is an uncommon but potentially debilitating complication. Symptoms can manifest upon emergence from anesthesia or days to weeks following surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of spontaneous electromyography (spEMG) monitoring in detecting evolving C-5 nerve root compromise. By contrast, transcranial electrical stimulation–induced motor evoked potential (tceMEP) monitoring has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in identifying impending C-5 injury. In this study the authors sought to 1) determine the frequency of immediate versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery, 2) identify risk factors associated with the development of C-5 palsies, and 3) determine whether tceMEP and spEMG neuromonitoring can help to identify acutely evolving C-5 injury as well as predict delayed-onset deltoid muscle paresis.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed the neuromonitoring and surgical records of all patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery involving the C-4 and/or C-5 level in the period from 2006 to 2008. Real-time tceMEP and spEMG monitoring from the deltoid muscle was performed as part of a multimodal neuromonitoring protocol during all surgeries. Charts were reviewed to identify patients who had experienced significant changes in tceMEPs and/or episodes of neurotonic spEMG activity during surgery, as well as those who had shown new-onset deltoid weakness either immediately upon emergence from the anesthesia or in a delayed fashion.

Results

Two hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing 235 cervical spine surgeries involving the C4–5 level served as the study cohort. The overall incidence of perioperative C-5 nerve root injury was 5.1%. The incidence was greatest (50%) in cases with dual corpectomies at the C-4 and C-5 spinal levels. All patients who emerged from anesthesia with deltoid weakness had significant and unresolved changes in tceMEPs during surgery, whereas only 1 had remarkable spEMG activity. Sensitivity and specificity of tceMEP monitoring for identifying acute-onset deltoid weakness were 100% and 99%, respectively. By contrast, sensitivity and specificity for spEMG were only 20% and 92%, respectively. Neither modality was effective in identifying patients who demonstrated delayed-onset deltoid weakness.

Conclusions

The risk of new-onset deltoid muscle weakness following cervical spine surgery is greatest for patients undergoing 2-level corpectomies involving C-4 and C-5. Transcranial electrical stimulation–induced MEP monitoring is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting C-5 radiculopathy that manifests immediately upon waking from anesthesia. While the absence of sustained spEMG activity does not rule out nerve root irritation, the presence of excessive neurotonic discharges serves both to alert the surgeon of such potentially injurious events and to prompt neuromonitoring personnel about the need for additional tceMEP testing. Delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury cannot be predicted by intraoperative neuromonitoring via either modality.

A brief overview of 100 years of history of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The history of surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis reaches back about 100 years: the natural course of progressive, crippling and sometimes even life-threatening deformities which could not be controlled by external means called for effectual, invasive procedures. Hibbs 1911 aimed at halting progression by long, uninstrumented fusions. However, the lack of true correction, long rehabilitation times, high pseudarthrosis and infection rates, and a fusion mass which bent further once exposed to gravity again were not satisfying. The transition from slowing progression to halting progression and truly correcting the deformity lasted almost another half a century: Paul Harrington, confronted with many scoliotic polio patients, successfully introduced a hook-rod system for concave-distraction and convex-compression at the end of the 1950s. Many implant failures, a still-considerable pseudarthrosis rate, flattening of the sagittal profile and the lack of true three-dimensional (3D) correction were the shortcomings. In the 1970s the Frenchmen Cotrel and Dubousset took scoliosis surgery to the next level by introducing a versatile hook system and curve-pattern-adapted correction modes. The basics of the so-called derotation-manoeuvre consists in strategic distribution of the anchors along the curve, bending the rod accordingly, and rotating it back into the sagittal plane. The overall correction, stability and the fusion rates improved significantly. However, the effect on the sagittal and transverse plane were still limited. Lately, a better biomechanical understanding and bilateral, polysegmental strong three-column fixation with pedicle screw has become the benchmark method: in conjunction with posterior release techniques, osteotomies or even vertebral column resections for severe cases, it allows better 3D control (vertebral column manipulation), faster rehabilitation and better patient satisfaction.

A review of intraoperative monitoring for spinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is a technique that is helpful for assessing the nervous system during spine surgery.

METHODS

This is a review of the field describing the basic mechanisms behind the techniques of IONM. These include the most often utilized trancranial motor evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), and stimulated and spontaneous EMG activity. It also describes some of the issues regarding practices and qualifications of practitioners.

RESULTS

Although the anatomic pathways responsible for the Tc-MEP and SSEP are well known and these clinical techniques have a high sensitivity and specificity, there is little published data showing that monitoring actually leads to improved patient outcomes. It is evident that IONM has high utility when the risk of injury is high, but may be only marginally helpful when the risk of injury is very low. The monitoring team must be well trained, be able to provide the surgeon feedback in real time, and coordinate activities with those of the surgical and anesthesia teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Although IONM is a valuable technique that provides sensitive and specific indications of neurologic injury, it does have limitations that must be understood. Maintaining a high quality of practice with appropriately trained personnel is critical.