Complications in spinal deformity surgery: issues unrelated directly to intraoperative technical skills

Dual Versus Single Attending Surgeon Performance of Spinal Deformity Surgery? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of 2 surgeons in spinal deformity surgery is considered beneficial by some. In fact, select studies indicate advantages such as reduced operation time and blood loss. Another observed decreased patient morbidity with a dual-surgeon approach, attributed to shorter operative times and reduced intraoperative blood losses. Therefore, this meta-analysis will assess the benefits of a having 2 surgeons compared to 1 surgeon during spine surgeries.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched till January 2024. The clinical outcomes evaluated were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of transfusion, reoperation, and surgery-related parameters such as operative room time, length of stay (LOS), and estimated blood loss.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included. A greater rate of complications was seen in patients operated upon by 1 surgeon (odds ratio = 0.50; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.25-0.99, P = 0.05). Furthermore, operative room time (mean differences = -82.73; 95% CI: -111.42 to -54.03, P < 0.001) and LOS (mean differences = -0.91; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.71, P < 0.001) were reduced in the dual surgeon scenario. No statistically significant difference was shown in the remaining analyzed outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of 2 surgeons in the odds ratiowas shown to reduce complications, operative room time, and LOS. More cost-effectiveness studies are needed in order to substantiate the financial advantages associated with the dual-surgeon approach.

Same-Day Versus Staged Spinal Fusion: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aims to compare same-day versus staged spine surgery, assessing their effects on patient care and health care system efficiency.

BACKGROUND

In spinal surgery, the debate between whether same-day and staged surgeries are better for patients continues, as the decision may impact patient-related outcomes, health care resources, and overall costs. While some surgeons advocate for staged surgeries, citing reduced risks of complications, others proclaim same-day surgeries may minimize costs and length of hospital stays.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until February 2024. The studied outcomes were operative room (OR) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), overall complications, venous thromboembolism (VTE), death, operations, and nonhome discharge.

RESULTS

Sixteen retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, representing a total of 2346 patients, of which 644 underwent staged spinal fusion surgeries and 1702 same-day surgeries. No statistically significant difference was observed in EBL between staged and same-day surgery groups. However, the staged group exhibited a statistically significant longer OR time ( P =0.05) and LOS ( P =0.004). A higher rate of overall complications ( P =0.002) and VTE ( P =0.0008) was significantly associated with the staged group. No significant differences were found in the rates of death, reoperations, and nonhome discharge between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both staged and same-day spinal fusion surgeries showed comparable rates of death, operations, and nonhome discharges for patients undergoing spinal surgeries. However, given the increased OR time, LOS, and complications associated with staged spinal surgeries, this study supports same-day surgeries when possible to minimize the burden on healthcare resources and enhance efficiency.

Perioperative Cerebrovascular Accidents in Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Descriptive Study and A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Perioperative cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) related to spine surgery, although rare, can lead to significant disabilities. More studies on spine surgeries are required to identify those at risk of perioperative CVAs. The characteristics and outcomes of patients that experienced CVAs during spine surgery were assessed through a retrospective descriptive study and meta-analysis.

Methods

Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent spine surgery under general anesthesia at a hospital between April 2011 and March 2023 were examined. Of the 2,391 initially identified patients, 2,346 were included after excluding 45 who underwent debridement for surgical site infections. Subsequently, a meta-analysis including the present retrospective descriptive study was conducted. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for original peer-reviewed articles written in English.

Results

Of the 2,346 patients, 4 (0.17%) (three men, one woman) exhibited perioperative CVAs associated with spine surgery. The CVAs were diverse in nature: one case of cerebral hemorrhage resulting from dural injury during posterior occipitocervical fusion, two cases of cerebral infarctions after lumbar laminectomy and anterior thoracic fusion due to anticoagulant discontinuation, and one case of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome following microscopic lumbar discectomy due to gestational hypertension. The subsequent meta-analysis included three studies (n=186,860). It showed several risk factors for perioperative CVAs, including cervical level (pooled odds ratio [OR]=1.33), hypertension (pooled OR=2.27), atrial fibrillation (pooled OR=8.78), history of heart disease (pooled OR=2.47), and diabetes (pooled OR=2.13).

Conclusions

It was speculated that the potential risk factors for the four perioperative CVA cases of spine surgery in this retrospective descriptive study were intraoperative dural injury, preoperative anticoagulant discontinuation, and gestational hypertension history. The meta-analysis revealed that cervical spine surgery, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, heart disease, and diabetes increased the CVA risk. This highlights the need for risk assessment, preoperative optimization, and postoperative care to reduce spine surgery-associated perioperative CVAs.

Incorporation of Blood and Fluid Management Within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Complex Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary set of evidence-based interventions to reduce morbidity and accelerate postoperative recovery. Complex spine surgery carries high risks of perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and suboptimal fluid states. This study evaluates the efficacy of a perioperative fluid and blood management component comprised of a restrictive transfusion policy, goal directed fluid management, number of tranexamic acid (TXA) utilization, and autologous blood transfusion within our ERAS protocol for complex spine surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review compared patients undergoing elective complex spine surgery prior to and following implementation of an ERAS protocol with intraoperative blood and fluid management. Outcomes included incidence of blood transfusion, estimated blood loss, intraoperative crystalloids administered, frequency of intraoperative TXA utilized, incidence of patients extubated within the operating room (OR), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

Following implementation, the rate of blood transfusion decreased by 11.7%(P = .017) and average crystalloid infusion was reduced 680 mL per case(P < .001). Intraoperative blood loss decreased on average 342 mL per case(P = .001) and TXA use increased significantly by 25%(P < .001). Postoperative ICU admissions declined by 8.5%(P = .071); extubation within the OR increased by 13.3%(P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

This protocol presents a unique perspective with the inclusion of an interdisciplinary and comprehensive blood and fluid management protocol as an integral part of our ERAS pathway for complex spine surgery. These results indicate that a standardized approach is associated with reduced rates of blood transfusion and optimized fluid states which was correlated with decreased postoperative ICU admissions.

Single- versus Dual-Attending Surgeon Approach for Spine Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of spine deformity is associated with significant morbidity. Recent literature has inconsistently demonstrated better outcomes after utilizing 2 attending surgeons for spine deformity.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies reporting outcomes following single- vs dual-attending surgeons for spine deformity.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane databases were last searched on July 16, 2020. A total of 1013 records were identified excluding duplicates. After screening, 10 studies (4 cohort, 6 case series) were included in the meta-analysis. Random-effect models were used to pool the effect estimates by study design. When feasible, further subgroup analysis by deformity type was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 953 patients were analyzed. Pooled results from propensity score-matched cohort studies revealed that the single-surgeon approach was unfavorably associated with a nonstatistically significant higher blood loss (mean difference = 421.0 mL; 95% CI: -28.2, 870.2), a statistically significant higher operative time (mean difference = 94.3 min; 95% CI: 54.9, 133), length of stay (mean difference = 0.84 d; 95% CI: 0.46, 1.22), and an increased risk of complications (Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.12, 7.66). Data from pooled case series demonstrated similar results for all outcomes. Moreover, these results did not differ significantly between deformity types (adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and adult spinal deformity).

CONCLUSION

Dual-attending surgeon approach appeared to be associated with reduced operative time, shorter hospital stays, and reduced risk of complications. These findings may potentially improve outcomes in surgical treatment of spine deformity.

Perioperative Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in Spine Surgery: A Series of 5 Cases

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a potentially life-threatening condition that can lead to disability and prolonged hospital stay. Perioperative stroke is a rare complication of spine surgery, especially in elective procedures. The prevalence of this complication varies in the literature, and the physiopathology is uncertain in many cases. Our objective was to describe 5 cases of patients who underwent spine surgery complicated by perioperative stroke and to analyze their characteristics and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from spine surgeries performed at a single institution from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients who presented with perioperative stroke were included. Data related to patient demographics, postoperative status, hospital stay, type of surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, neurologic status at discharge, and mortality were registered.

RESULTS

Five of 1002 consecutive patients (0.49%) had complication of stroke during surgery. The surgeries included occipitocervical fusion, anterior cervical fusion, lumbar fusion, lumbosacral fusion, and thoracolumbar fusion. The mean age of patients was 52.2 ± 15.73 years (range, 39-78 years), and the mean time of hospitalization was 20 ± 26.93 days (range, 6-68 days). The majority of patients were women (80%). Three patients (60%) presented with ischemic stroke, and 2 patients (40%) had hemorrhagic stroke. Two patients were severely disabled, and 3 showed good neurologic outcomes; no in-hospital deaths were observed. The etiology of stroke remained uncertain in the majority of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the rarity of this complication, perioperative stroke in spine surgery can lead to considerable morbidity. Precocious diagnosis and treatment may improve patient outcomes.

Multidisciplinary approaches to complication reduction in complex spine surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Complex spine surgery carries a high complication rate that can produce suboptimal outcomes for patients undergoing these extensive operations. However, multidisciplinary pathways introduced at multiple institutions have demonstrated a promising potential toward reducing the burden of complications in patients being treated for spinal deformities. To date, there has been no effort to systematically collate the multidisciplinary approaches in use at various institutions.

PURPOSE

The present study aims to determine effective multidisciplinary strategies for reducing the complication rate in complex spine surgery by analyzing existing institutional multidisciplinary approaches and delineating common themes across multiple practice settings.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We followed guidelines established under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The studies reported on data from PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and Cochrane. We included articles that described either approaches to, or results from, the implementation of multidisciplinary paradigms during the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative phases of care for patients undergoing complex spine surgery. We excluded studies that only targeted one complication unless such an approach was in coordination with more extensive multidisciplinary planning at the same institution.

RESULTS

A total of 406 unique articles were identified. Following an initial determination based on title and abstract, 22 articles met criteria for full-text review, and 10 met the inclusion criteria to be included in the review. Key aspects of multidisciplinary approaches to complex spine surgery included extensive preoperative workup and interdisciplinary conferencing, intraoperative communication and monitoring, and postoperative floor management and discharge planning. These strategies produced decreases in surgical duration and complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first to systematically analyze multidisciplinary approaches to reduce complications in complex spine surgery. This review provides a roadmap toward reducing the elevated complication rate for patients undergoing complex spine surgery.

Complications of Thoracolumbar Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a challenging problem for spine surgeons given the high risk of complications, both medical and surgical. Surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for medical complications, including cardiac, pulmonary, thromboembolic, genitourinary and gastrointestinal, renal, cognitive and psychiatric, and skin conditions, in the perioperative period and have a low threshold for involving specialists. Surgical complications, including neurologic injuries, vascular injuries, proximal junctional kyphosis, durotomy, and pseudarthrosis and rod fracture, can be devastating for the patient and costly to the health-care system. Mortality rates have been reported to be between 1.0% and 3.5% following ASD surgery. With the increasing rate of ASD surgery, surgeons should properly counsel patients about these risks and have a high index of suspicion for complications in the perioperative period.

Recent Advances in Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in Adult Scoliosis

Objective:

Conventional open spinal surgery of adult scoliosis can be performed from anterior, posterior, or combined approach. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) was developed for the purpose of reducing the undesirable effects and complications. This review aimed to make a brief summary of recent studies of the approach and clinical outcomes of MISS in adult scoliosis.

Data Sources:

We conducted a systematic search from PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and other literature databases to collect reports of surgical methods and clinical outcomes of MISS in treatment of adult scoliosis. Those reports were published up to March 2017 with the following key terms: “minimally invasive,” “spine,” “surgery,” and “scoliosis.”

Study Selection:

The inclusion criteria of the articles were as followings: diagnosed with adult degenerative scoliosis (DS) or adult idiopathic scoliosis; underwent MISS or open surgery; with follow-up data. The articles involving patients with congenital scoliosis or unknown type were excluded and those without any follow-up data were also excluded from the study. The initial search yielded 233 articles. After title and abstract extraction, 29 English articles were selected for full-text review. Of those, 20 studies with 831 patients diagnosed with adult DS or adult idiopathic scoliosis were reviewed. Seventeen were retrospective studies, and three were prospective studies.

Results:

The surgical technique reported in these articles was direct or extreme lateral interbody fusion, axial lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Among the clinical outcomes of these studies, the operated levels was 3–7, operative time was 2.3–8.5 h. Both the Cobb angle of coronal major curve and evaluation of Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale decreased after surgery. There were 323 complications reported in the 831 (38.9%) patients, including 150 (18.1%) motor or sensory deficits, and 111 (13.4%) implant-related complications.

Conclusions:

MISS can provide good radiological and self-evaluation improvement in treatment of adult scoliosis. More prospective studies will be needed before it is widely used.

Lumbar spine fusion surgery and stroke: a national cohort study

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and risk of stroke after lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

METHOD

Study subjects were identified from a nationwide cohort of 1 million people from 2000 to 2005 and were divided into the lumbar spinal fusion group (n = 2,015), who received posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery, and the comparison group (n = 16,120) composed of age-, sex-, and propensity score-matched control subjects. The matching process was intended to adjust for demographics, comorbidities, and other immeasurable covariates to minimize selection bias. All subjects were followed up for 3 years for stroke, including hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence rate of stroke in the cohort was 9.99 per 1,000 person-year. The lumbar spinal fusion group was less likely to have any stroke (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.83, p = 0.293), hemorrhagic stroke (adjusted HR = 0.74, p = 0.739) and ischemic stroke (adjusted HR = 0.81, p = 0.250) than the comparison group, but without significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Three years post-operatively, patients who received lumbar spinal fusion had stroke incidence rates similar to those without surgery. Posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery is not associated with increased risks for any kind of stroke.

The risk of stroke after spinal fusion surgery: a national cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Postoperative stroke is a rare complication of spinal fusion surgery, but its relevant risk and incidence remain unclear.

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence and risk of stroke after spinal fusion surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All study subjects were extracted from a nationwide representative cohort of one million people from 2000 to 2005.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Stroke, including hemorrhagic and ischemic, during the study period.

METHODS

An exposure group of 2,249 subjects who received spinal fusion surgery during the study period was compared with 2,203 control subjects matched by age, sex, and propensity score. All were followed up for 3 years for all kinds of stroke. Demographics, comorbidities, and nonmeasurable covariates were matched between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed, with adjustments by Cox regression model.

RESULTS

There were 4,452 subjects, including 2,249 spinal fusion patients and 2,203 controls, who were followed up for 12,967 person-years. The incidence rates of any, hemorrhagic, and ischemic strokes were 9.95, 1.21, and 8.86, respectively, per 1,000 person-years in the spinal fusion group and 11.5, 1.69, and 9.93, respectively, in the comparison group. Patients who received spinal fusion surgery were less likely to have any stroke (crude hazard ratio [HR]=0.87, p=.393), hemorrhagic stroke (HR=0.72, p=.473), and ischemic stroke (HR=0.89, p=.582) than the comparison group but without statistical significance. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and medications, there were still no significant differences for risks of any, hemorrhagic, and ischemic strokes (adjusted HR=0.89, 1.36, and 0.87; p=.522, .553, and .477, respectively) in the spinal fusion group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving spinal fusion surgery have similar incidence rates of having a stroke within 3 years postoperation as those without surgery. Risks of any postoperative stroke are similar or insignificantly lower in the spinal fusion group.

Factors affecting the accurate placement of percutaneous pedicle screws during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

We retrospectively evaluated 488 percutaneous pedicle screws in 110 consecutive patients that had undergone minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) to determine the incidence of pedicle screw misplacement and its relevant risk factors. Screw placements were classified based on postoperative computed tomographic findings as "correct", "cortical encroachment" or as "frank penetration". Age, gender, body mass index, bone mineral density, diagnosis, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), level of fusion, surgeon's position, spinal alignment, quality/quantity of multifidus muscle, and depth to screw entry point were considered to be demographic and anatomical variables capable of affecting pedicle screw placement. Pedicle dimensions, facet joint arthritis, screw location (ipsilateral or contralateral), screw length, screw diameter, and screw trajectory angle were regarded as screw-related variables. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine relations between these variables and the correctness of screw placement. The incidence of cortical encroachment was 12.5% (61 screws), and frank penetration was found for 54 (11.1%) screws. Two patients (0.4%) with medial penetration underwent revision for unbearable radicular pain and foot drop, respectively. The odds ratios of significant risk factors for pedicle screw misplacement were 3.373 (95% CI 1.095-10.391) for obesity, 1.141 (95% CI 1.024-1.271) for pedicle convergent angle, 1.013 (95% CI 1.006-1.065) for EBL >400 cc, and 1.003 (95% CI 1.000-1.006) for cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle. Although percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws was performed safely during MITLIF, several risk factors should be considered to improve placement accuracy.