Is surgical case order associated with increased infection rate after spine surgery?

Outcome differences between surgeons performing first and subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting procedures in a day: a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

With increasing surgical workload, it is common for cardiac surgeons to perform coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after other procedures in a workday. To investigate whether prior procedures performed by the surgeon impact the outcomes, we compared the outcomes between CABGs performed first versus those performed after prior procedures, separately for on-pump and off-pump CABGs as they differed in technical complexity.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing isolated CABG in China from January 2013 to December 2018. Patients were categorised as undergoing on-pump and off-pump CABGs. Outcomes of the procedures performed first in primary surgeons' daily schedule (first procedure) were compared with subsequent ones (non-first procedure). The primary outcome was an adverse events composite (AEC) defined as the number of adverse events, including in-hospital mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury and reoperation. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome, presented as binary variables. Mixed-effects models were used, adjusting for patient and surgeon-level characteristics and year of surgery.

RESULTS

Among 21 866 patients, 10 109 (16.1% as non-first) underwent on-pump and 11 757 (29.6% as non-first) off-pump CABG. In the on-pump cohort, there was no significant association between procedure order and the outcomes (all p>0.05). In the off-pump cohort, non-first procedures were associated with an increased number of AEC (adjusted rate ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.47, p<0.001), myocardial infarction (adjusted OR (OR_adj) 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.81, p=0.003) and stroke (OR_adj 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.53, p=0.005) compared with first procedures. These increases were only found to be statistically significant when the procedure was performed by surgeons with <20 years' practice or surgeons with a preindex volume <700 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

For a technically challenging surgical procedure like off-pump CABG, prior workload adversely affected patient outcomes.

Incidence and local risk factors of infection after anterior sub-axial cervical spine surgery: retrospective database analysis of 4897 consecutive procedures

INTRODUCTION

The anterior cervical spine approach is safe and effective in many cervical spine pathologies. It is considered one of the most common approaches in spine surgery. Postoperative infections after anterior cervical surgery are rare but serious.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective database analysis. In this study, the incidence, and the local risk factors of postoperative infection after anterior-only sub-axial cervical spine surgery in a high-volume spine center were analyzed. The data of patients operated in a teaching hospital is electronically stored in a comprehensive medical database program. Postoperative infection after anterior cervical surgery from C2 to C7 was calculated and analyzed. In the study period, 4897 patients were operated. Twenty-four infections after a primary aseptic operation were detected. Independent local risk factors were estimated.

RESULTS

Postoperative infection occurred in 24/4897 patients (0.49%). The incidence of infection after cervical trauma was 3% (7/229), after spinal cord injury 4.3% (2/46), with myelopathy 1.98% (11/556), and after revision surgery 1.25% (7/560). The incidence showed a significant increase (p = 0.00, 0.01, 0.02). In 14 of the postoperatively infected patients (58.3%) an oesophageal injury was diagnosed. Odds ratios (OR) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% was calculated. Independent risk factors for the postoperative infections were: Cervical trauma (OR 8.59, 95% CI 3.52-20.93), revision surgery (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.33-7.82), The presence of cervical myelopathy (OR 6.71, 95% CI 2.99-15.06), and spinal cord injury (OR 9.33, 95% CI 2.13-40.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative infection after anterior cervical surgery is low (0.49%). In addition to the general risk factor for infection, the local risk factors are trauma, myelopathy, spinal cord injury, and revision surgeries. In the case of postoperative infection, an oesophageal injury should be excluded.

Risk factors associated with positive bacterial culture in salvaged red blood cells during cardiac surgery and postoperative infection incidence: A prospective cohort study

Background

This study was designed to explore factors associated with the incidence of positive bacterial culture of salvaged red blood cells (sRBCs) recovered with a Cell Saver instrument during cardiac surgery and the impact of such positive outcomes on postoperative infection-related morbidity.

Methods

The cohort study enrolled 204 patients scheduled for cardiac surgery with intraoperative blood cell salvage and retransfusion from July 2021 to July 2022. These patients were stratified into two groups based on intraoperative sRBCs bacterial culture results: culture (+) and culture (-) groups. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were compared between these groups aim to detect possible predictors of positive culture in sRBCs. In addition, differences in postoperative infection-related morbidity and other clinical outcomes were compared between these groups.

Results

Of these patients, 49% were sRBCs culture (+), with Staphylococcus epidermidis as the most commonly identified pathogen. Risk factors independently associated with the risk of positive culture in sRBCs included BMI ≥25 kg/m², a history of smoking, an operative duration ≥277.5 min, the higher number of staff in the operating room and higher surgical case order. Patients in the sRBCs culture (+) group exhibited a longer average ICU stay [3.5 days (2.0-6.0) vs. 2 days (1.0-4.0), P < 0.01], a longer duration of ventilation [20.45 h (12.0-17.8) vs. 13 h (11.0-17.0, P = 0.02)], underwent more allogeneic blood transfusions, exhibited higher transfusion-related costs [2,962 (1,683.0-5,608.8) vs. 2,525 (1,532.3-3,595.0), P = 0.01], and had higher rates of postoperative infections (22 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.02) as compared to patients in the sRBCs culture (-) group. In addition, culture (+) in sRBCs was an independent risk factor for postoperative infection (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.16-5.90, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common pathogen detected in sRBCs in the culture (+) group in this study, identifying it as a potential driver of postoperative infection. Positive sRBCs culture may contribute to postoperative infection and its incidence was significantly associated with patient BMI, history of smoking, operative duration, the number of staff in the operating room and surgical case order.

The impact of case order and intraoperative staff changes on spine surgical efficiency

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Despite concerted efforts toward quality improvement in high-volume spine surgery, there remains concern that increases in case load may compromise the efficient and safe delivery of surgical care. There is a paucity of evidence to describe the effects of spine case order and operating room (OR) team structure on measures of intraoperative timing and OR efficiency.

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine if intraoperative staff changes and surgical case order independently predict extensions in intraoperative timing after spinal surgery for spondylotic diseases.

STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING

Retrospective cohort analysis PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients over age 18 who underwent primary or revision decompression and/or fusion for degenerative spinal diseases between 2017 to 2019 at a single academic institution were retrospectively identified. Exclusion criteria included absence of descriptive data and intraoperative timing parameters as well as surgery for traumatic injury, infection, and malignancy.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraoperative timing metrics including total theater time, wheels in to induction, induction start to cut, cut to close, and close to wheels out. Postoperative outcomes included length of hospital stay and 90-day hospital readmissions.

METHODS

Surgical case order and intraoperative changes in staff (circulator and surgical scrub nurse or technician) were determined. Patient demographics, surgical factors, intraoperative timing and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Extensions in each operative stage were determined as a ratio of the actual duration of the parameter divided by the predicted duration of the parameter. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare outcomes within case order and staff change groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1,108 patients met the inclusion criteria. First, second, and third start cases differed significantly in intraoperative extensions of total theater time, wheels in to induction, induction start to cut, cut to close, and close to wheels out. On regression, decreasing case order predicted extension in wheels in to induction time. Surgeries with intraoperative staff changes were associated with increases in total theater time, induction start to cut time, cut to close time, close to wheels out time, and length of hospital stay. Switch in primary circulator predicted extended theater time and cut to close time. Relief of primary circulator or scrub predicted extended total theater time, induction start to cut time, cut to close time, and close to wheels out time.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative staff change in spine surgery independently predicted extended operative duration. However, higher case order was not significantly associated with procedural time.

Is the Use of Intraoperative 3D Navigation for Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery a Risk Factor for Post-Operative Infection?

Pedicle screw fixation is a technique used to provide rigid fixation in thoracolumbar spine surgery. Safe intraosseous placement of pedicle screws is necessary to provide optimal fixation as well as to avoid damage to adjacent anatomic structures. Despite the wide variety of techniques available, none thus far has been able to fully eliminate the risk of malpositioned screws. Intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation (I3DN) was developed to improve accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws. To our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated whether infection rates are higher with I3DN. A single-institution, retrospective study of patients age > 18 undergoing thoracolumbar fusion and instrumentation was carried out and use of I3DN was recorded. The I3DN group had a significantly greater rate of return to the operating room for culture-positive incision and drainage (17 (4.1%) vs. 1 (0.6%), p = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, the use of I3DM did not reach significance with an OR of 6.49 (0.84−50.02, p = 0.073). Post-operative infections are multifactorial and potential infection risks associated with I3DN need to be weighed against the safety benefits of improved accuracy of pedicle screw positioning.

Increased Surgical Site Subcutaneous Fat Thickness Is Associated with Infection after Posterior Cervical Fusion

Background: Previous literature has associated increased body mass index (BMI) with risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after posterior cervical fusion (PCF) surgery. However, few studies have examined the association between local adiposity and risk of SSI, re-admission, and re-operation after PCF. Local adiposity is easily measured on pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and may act as a more accurate predictor compared with BMI. Patients and Methods: Subjects undergoing PCF from 2013-2018 at a single institution were identified retrospectively. Posterior cervical subcutaneous fat thickness, paraspinal muscle thickness, and lamina-to-skin distance measurements were obtained from computed tomography (CT) or MRI scans. Subjects with active infection, malignancy, or revision procedures were excluded. Results: Two hundred five patients were included with 20 developing SSIs. Subjects with SSIs had a longer fusion construct (4.90 vs. 3.71 levels; p = 0.001), higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI; 2.05 vs. 1.34; p = 0.045), had a history of diabetes mellitus (30% vs. 10.8%; p = 0.026), higher subcutaneous fat thickness (30.5 vs. 23.6 mm; p = 0.013), and higher lamina-to-skin distance (66.4 vs. 57.9 mm; p = 0.027). Subcutaneous fat thickness (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.10]; p = 0.026) and lamina-to-skin distance (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09]; p = 0.014) were associated with SSI in multivariable analysis. A subcutaneous fat thickness cutoff value of 23.2 mm had 90% sensitivity and 54.1% specificity for prediction of SSI. There was no association need for re-admission or re-operation. Conclusions: Increased posterior cervical fat may increase the risk of SSI after PCF. Pre-operative advanced imaging may be a valuable tool for assisting with patient counseling, optimization, and risk stratification.

Pilot study: Post-surgical infections could be related with lack of sharpness in surgical tools

Despite rigorous sterilization protocols placed in surgical procedures, there is demonstrated evidence that show patients contract infections while hospitalized. This study aims to investigate the presence of biological materials in osteotome surgical tools after sterilization processes, determine the relationship between lack of sharpness and cross-contamination, and evaluate the influence of materials surface coating as a potential contamination preventive. Three commercially available osteotomes with different surface coatings were studied and submitted to a procedure of bone-cutting cycles. After use, each was sterilized and examined under SEM and EDS. Bone contaminants were detected in each osteotome although the PVD coated osteotome demonstrated significantly less contamination than either the as-supplied or electroless nickel coated one. According to the results, there is an association between blade sharpness and post-sterilization bone contamination. These findings suggest either disposable osteotomes should be used in surgical procedures, or an effective sharpen process should both be established and monitored to minimise post-operative infections.

Nuchal thickness and increased risk of surgical site infection in posterior cervical operations

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infections (SSI) are a common post-operative complication, which increase cost, length of stay, and morbidity. Many risk factors have been, identified including body mass index (BMI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate, whether nuchal thickness rather than BMI increases risk for post-operative SSI in, posterior approach cervical spine operations.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 180 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine, surgery at the University of Florida was performed. Nuchal thickness was measured, from the ventral most point of the spinous process of C5 to the skin on mid-sagittal preoperative, imaging. Diabetes status, BMI, smoking status, duration of anesthesia, prior, operations, and subcutaneous layer thickness was also collected. Infections were, identified according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions for SSI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by a biostatistician.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (11%) had SSI. Smoking status, nuchal thickness of greater, than 55 mm or less than 29.8 mm, and subcutaneous fat thickness were all associated, with SSI. Age (OR 0.99, p = 0.45), diabetes (OR 0.50, p = 0.37), BMI (OR 1.03, p = 0.35), and use of intraoperative antibiotic powder (OR 0.62, p = 0.35) were not associated with, infection. On multivariate analysis (adjusted for smoking status), nuchal thickness, (p < 0.0001), subcutaneous fat thickness (p < 0.0001), and the ratio of subcutaneous fat to, nuchal thickness (p < 0.0001) all remained associated with SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Nuchal thickness and subcutaneous fat thickness are associated with SSI, in patients undergoing posterior cervical spine surgery. Risk of infection increases with very thin and very thick nuchal measurements.

Do Preoperative Epidural Steroid Injections Increase the Risk of Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate an association between preoperative lumbar epidural corticosteroid injections (ESI) and infection after lumbar spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ESI may provide diagnostic and therapeutic benefit; however, concern exists regarding whether preoperative ESI may increase risk of postoperative infection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent lumbar decompression alone or fusion procedures for radiculopathy or stenosis between 2000 and 2017 with 90 days follow-up were identified by ICD/CPT codes. Each cohort was categorized as no preoperative ESI, less than 30 days, 30 to 90 days, and greater than 90 days before surgery. The primary outcome measure was postoperative infection requiring reoperation within 90 days of index procedure. Demographic information including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was determined. Comparison and regression analysis was performed to determine an association between preoperative ESI exposure, demographics/comorbidities, and postoperative infection.

RESULTS

A total of 15,011 patients were included, 5108 underwent fusion and 9903 decompression only. The infection rate was 1.95% and 0.98%, among fusion and decompression patients, respectively. There was no association between infection and preoperative ESI exposure at any time point (1.0%, P = 0.853), ESI within 30 days (1.37%, P = 0.367), ESI within 30 to 90 days (0.63%, P = 0.257), or ESI > 90 days (1.3%, P = 0.277) before decompression surgery. There was increased risk of infection in those patients undergoing preoperative ESI before fusion compared to those without (2.68% vs. 1.69%, P = 0.025). There was also increased risk of infection with an ESI within 30 days of surgery (5.74%, P = 0.005) and when given > 90 days (2.9%, P = 0.022) before surgery. Regression analysis of all patients demonstrated that fusion (P < 0.001), BMI (P < 0.001), and CCI (P = 0.019) were independent predictors of postoperative infection, while age, sex, and preoperative ESI exposure were not.

CONCLUSION

An increased risk of infection was found in patients with preoperative ESI undergoing fusion procedures, but no increased risk with decompression only. Fusion, BMI, and CCI were predictors of postoperative infection.Level of Evidence: 3.

Impact of surgical case order on epiretinal membrane peeling surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether surgical warm-up affects epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling complication rates and surgical case times.

SETTING

Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

We assessed consecutive patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for ERM peel (macular pucker) by one surgeon at the Jewish General Hospital from January 2006 until March 2016. Cases evaluated were sequential ERM peels performed as the first 2 surgeries of the day. The first case of the day was considered the "warm-up" and the second case was the "post-warm-up." Baseline demographics, pre-operative characteristics, perioperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 2 months and 6 months, as well as postoperative complications are described. Results were analyzed using the χ² test, t test, and Fischer's exact test. Regression models were used to identify any predictors of postoperative BCVA.

RESULTS

The study reviewed 108 patients. The warm-up group was compared with the post-warm-up group, and there was no significant difference between the mean pre-operative BCVA and the post-operative BCVA at 2 and 6 months. ERM peeling surgery complication rates were not statistically different between the warm-up cases and the post-warm-up cases. There was a tendency for performing complex surgeries that needed phaco procedures in post-warm-up cases (13% vs 2%, p = 0.03). Analysis of simple ERM peeling procedures (with no concomitant phaco procedures) showed no statistically significant tendencies for any of the groups to go beyond the 60 minutes allocated for the surgery (25.4% vs 20.0%, p = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Warming-up does not influence the rate of postoperative complications or the postoperative BCVA in patients undergoing ERM peels. The strongest predictor of post-operative BCVA was pre-operative BCVA.

Perioperative Invasive Vascular Catheterization Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Infection in Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 114,259 Patient Records

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study's objective was to determine whether perioperative invasive vascular catheter placement, independent of comorbid conditions, modified the risk of postoperative infection in lumbar spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Infection is a risk inherent to lumbar spine surgery, with overall postoperative infection rates of 0.86%-8.5%. Patients experiencing postoperative infection have higher rates of mortality, revision surgeries, pseudarthrosis, and worsening pain and disability.

METHODS

Data were collected for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery between January 2007 and October 2015 with records in the nationwide Humana private insurance database. Patients receiving fusion, laminectomy, and discectomy were followed for 3 months from the date of surgery for surgical site infection (SSI), 6 months for subsequent incision and drainage (I&D), and 1 year for vertebral osteomyelitis (VO). Risk factors investigated included central venous catheter and arterial-line placement.

RESULTS

Analysis of 114,259 patient records showed an overall SSI rate of 3.2% within 1 month and 4.5% within 3 months, overall vertebral osteomyelitis rate of 0.82%-0.83% within 1 year, and overall I&D rate of 2.8% within 6 months. Patients receiving a first-time invasive vascular catheter on the day of surgery were more likely to experience SSI within 1 month [risk ratios (RR), 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-2.7], SSI within 3 months (RR, 2.4; 95% CI: 2.3-2.7), osteomyelitis within 1 year (RR, 4.2-4.3; 95% CI: 3.7-4.5), and undergo an I&D within 6 months (RR, 1.9; 95% CI: 1.8-2.0). These trends were consistent by procedure type and independent of the patient's weighted comorbidity index score (Charlson Comorbidity Index).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative invasive vascular catheterization was significantly associated with an increased the risk of postoperative infections in lumbar spine surgery, independent of a patient's concomitant comorbidities. Therefore, in patients with an indication for invasive catheterization, surgeons should consider risks and benefits of surgery carefully.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Body mass index and the risk of deep surgical site infection following posterior cervical instrumented fusion

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery is associated with increased morbidity, reoperation rates, hospital readmissions, and cost. The incidence of SSI following posterior cervical spine surgery is higher than anterior cervical spine surgery, with rates from 4.5% to 18%. It is well documented that higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with increased risk of SSI after spine surgery. There are only a few studies that examine the correlation of BMI and SSI after posterior cervical instrumented fusion (PCIF) using national databases, however, none that compare trauma and nontraumatic patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the odds of developing SSI with increasing BMI after PCIF, and to determine the risk of SSI in both trauma and nontraumatic adult patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of a prospective surgical database collected at one academic institution.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample is from a prospectively collected surgical registry from one institution, which includes patients who underwent PCIF from April 2011 to October 2017.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A SSI that required return to the operating room for surgical debridement.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using a prospectively collected database of all spine surgeries performed at our institution from April 2011 to October 2017. We identified 1,406 patients, who underwent PCIF for both traumatic injuries and nontraumatic pathologies using International Classification of Diseases 9 and 10 procedural codes. Thirty-day readmission data were obtained. Patient's demographics, BMI, presence of diabetes, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical procedures performed were identified. Using logistic regression analysis, the risk of SSI associated with every one-unit increase in BMI was determined. This study received no funding. All the authors in this study report no conflict of interests relevant to this study.

RESULTS

Of the 1,406 patients identified, 1,143 met our inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 688 had PCIF for traumatic injuries and 454 for nontraumatic pathologies. The incidence of SSI for all patients, who underwent PCIF was 3.9%. There was no significant difference in the rate of SSI between our trauma group and nontraumatic group. There was a higher rate of infection in patients, who were diabetic and with BMI≥30 kg/m². The presence of both diabetes and BMI≥30 kg/m² had an added effect on the risk of developing SSI in all patients, who underwent PCIF. Additionally, logistic regression analysis showed that there was a positive difference measure between BMI and SSI. Our results demonstrate that for one-unit increase in BMI, the odds of having a SSI is 1.048 (95% CI: 1.007-1.092, p=.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that our rate of SSI after PCIF is within the range of what is cited in the literature. Interestingly, we did not see a statistically significant difference in the rate of infection between our trauma and nontrauma group. Overall, diabetes and elevated BMI are associated with increased risk of SSI in all patients, who underwent PCIF with even a higher risk in patient, who are both diabetic and obese. Obese patients should be counseled on elevated SSI risk after PCIF, and those with diabetes should be medically optimized before and after surgery when possible to minimize SSI.

Clinical Outcomes After Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) demonstrates reliable improvement in neurologic symptoms associated with anterior compression of the cervical spine. There is a paucity of data on outcomes following 4-level ACDFs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes for patients undergoing 4-level ACDF.

METHODS

All 4-level ACDFs with at least 1-year clinical follow-up were identified. Clinical outcomes, including fusion rates, neurologic outcomes, and reoperation rates were determined.

RESULTS

Retrospective review of our institutional database revealed 25 patients who underwent 4-level ACDF with at least 1-year clinical follow-up. Average age was 57.5 years (range 38.2-75.0 years); 14 (56%) were male, and average body mass index was 30.2 kg/m² (range 19.9-43.4 kg/m²). Two (8%) required secondary cervical surgery at an average of 94.5 days postoperatively while the remaining 23 did not with an average follow-up of 19 months. Of 23 patients not requiring revision surgery, 16 (69%) patients fused by definition of less than 1 mm of spinous process motion per fused level in flexion and extension. Fifteen (65%) had at least one muscle group with one grade of weakness preoperatively. Nineteen of these patients (83%) had improved to full strength while no patients lost muscle strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of our institution's experience demonstrated a low rate of revision cervical surgery for any reason of 8% at mean 19 months follow-up, and neurological examinations consistently improved, despite a high rate of radiographic nonunion (31%).

Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery: Who Is at Risk?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective literature review of spine surgical site infection (SSI).

OBJECTIVE

To perform a review of SSI risk factors and more specifically, categorize them into patient and surgical factors.

METHODS

A review of published literature on SSI risk factors in adult spine surgery was performed. We included studies that reported risk factors for SSI in adult spinal surgery. Excluded are pediatric patient populations, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Overall, we identified 72 cohort studies, 1 controlled-cohort study, 1 matched-cohort study, 1 matched-paired cohort study, 12 case-controlled studies (CCS), 6 case series, and 1 cross-sectional study.

RESULTS

Patient-associated risk factors-diabetes mellitus, obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m²), subcutaneous fat thickness, multiple medical comorbidities, current smoker, and malnutrition were associated with SSI. Surgical associated factors-preoperative radiation/postoperative blood transfusion, combined anterior/posterior approach, surgical invasiveness, or levels of instrumentation were associated with increased SSI. There is mixed evidence of age, duration of surgery, surgical team, intraoperative blood loss, dural tear, and urinary tract infection/urinary catheter in association with SSI.

CONCLUSION

SSIs are associated with many risk factors that can be patient or surgically related. Our review was able to identify important modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors that can be essential in surgical planning and discussion with patients.

Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Surgical Site Infection in the Lumbar Spine

Surgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgery can be devastating for both the patient and the surgeon. It leads to significant morbidity and associated health care costs, from readmissions, reoperations, and subsequent poor clinical outcomes. Complications associated with SSI following spine surgery include pseudarthrosis, neurological deterioration, sepsis, and death. Its management can be very challenging. The diagnosis of SSI involves the interpretation of combined clinical, laboratory, and occasionally radiologic findings. Most infections can be treated with an appropriate course of antibiotics and bracing if required. Surgical intervention is usually reserved for infections resistant to medical management, the need for open biopsy/culture, evolving spinal instability or deformity, and neurologic deficit or deterioration. A thorough knowledge of associated risk factors is required and patients should be stratified for risk preoperatively. The multifaceted approach of risk stratification, early diagnosis and effective treatment, is essential for successful prevention and effective treatment and crucial for a satisfactory outcome.

An epidural steroid injection in the 6 months preceding a lumbar decompression without fusion predisposes patients to post-operative infections

Background

To determine if the timing of a lumbar epidural steroid injection (LESI) effects rates of post-operative infection in patients receiving a non-fusion lumbar decompression (LDC) due to degenerative disc disease (DDD). Lumbar pain due to DDD can frequently be temporized or definitively treated with epidural injections. While there is ample literature regarding the infection risks associated with corticosteroid injections prior to hip/knee replacements, there are few studies relating to the spine.

Methods

A nationwide insurance database was queried to identify those who underwent LDC for DDD without instrumentation [2005-2014]. Lumbar fusion procedures were excluded. From this group those with a history of a LESI were identified and matched to a control group without a history of LESI. Four separate cohorts were examined: (I) LDC and no LESI within 6 months (control); (II) LDC performed within 0-1 month after LESI; (III) LDC between 1 and 3 months after LESI; (IV) LDC performed between 3 and 6 months after LESI.

Results

There was an increased odds of a 90-day postoperative infection if the LESI was within the 1-3 months (OR =4.69; P<0.001) and 3-6 months (OR =5.33; P<0.001) interval prior to the LDC.

Conclusions

While LESI is helpful for possibly delaying or avoid lumbar surgery, it may predispose patients to higher infection rates following lumbar decompressions without fusion. Surgeons and pain management specialist should counsel patients on these risks and.

Recent Advances in Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in Adult Scoliosis

Objective:

Conventional open spinal surgery of adult scoliosis can be performed from anterior, posterior, or combined approach. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) was developed for the purpose of reducing the undesirable effects and complications. This review aimed to make a brief summary of recent studies of the approach and clinical outcomes of MISS in adult scoliosis.

Data Sources:

We conducted a systematic search from PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and other literature databases to collect reports of surgical methods and clinical outcomes of MISS in treatment of adult scoliosis. Those reports were published up to March 2017 with the following key terms: “minimally invasive,” “spine,” “surgery,” and “scoliosis.”

Study Selection:

The inclusion criteria of the articles were as followings: diagnosed with adult degenerative scoliosis (DS) or adult idiopathic scoliosis; underwent MISS or open surgery; with follow-up data. The articles involving patients with congenital scoliosis or unknown type were excluded and those without any follow-up data were also excluded from the study. The initial search yielded 233 articles. After title and abstract extraction, 29 English articles were selected for full-text review. Of those, 20 studies with 831 patients diagnosed with adult DS or adult idiopathic scoliosis were reviewed. Seventeen were retrospective studies, and three were prospective studies.

Results:

The surgical technique reported in these articles was direct or extreme lateral interbody fusion, axial lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Among the clinical outcomes of these studies, the operated levels was 3–7, operative time was 2.3–8.5 h. Both the Cobb angle of coronal major curve and evaluation of Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale decreased after surgery. There were 323 complications reported in the 831 (38.9%) patients, including 150 (18.1%) motor or sensory deficits, and 111 (13.4%) implant-related complications.

Conclusions:

MISS can provide good radiological and self-evaluation improvement in treatment of adult scoliosis. More prospective studies will be needed before it is widely used.

Intraoperative Handoffs and Postoperative Complications Among Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Oncology Operations

There is evidence that systems-based factors influence surgical outcomes of intraoperative and postoperative morbidity. The goal of this study was to provide an exploratory analysis of systems-based variables and their associations with surgical outcomes in gynecologic oncology patients. We merged electronic records from operating room software with billing claims from major surgeries performed from 2011 to 2013, at a tertiary care academic medical center. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between baseline demographic and clinical covariates (age, comorbidity, procedure type, and surgeon volume), the main exposure variables (case start time, case order, and personnel handoffs), and the primary outcome of 30-day postoperative complications. Multiple logistic regression models were created to analyze the contributing effect of each systemic variable on postoperative complications. The overall rate of postoperative complications among patients was 31.4% (n = 182). Although traditional risk factors of comorbidity, procedure type, and case length were the strongest primary drivers of complication risk, there was a significant relationship between handoffs among surgical scrub technicians and postoperative complications (odds ratio: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.00-4.47). As a novel finding in surgical quality and safety research, this supports greater efforts into integrating key staffing information into studies of systemic variables and surgical outcomes.

Factors Associated With Clinical Outcomes After Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Porous Nitinol Implant

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the association of demographic and perioperative factors with clinical outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion with a porous nitinol (TiNi) implant for degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with degenerative lumbar disease were prospectively followed for a mean of 4.8 years. All patients were instrumented with porous TiNi interbody fusion devices. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and return to work were used to assess clinical outcomes. Factors including age, body mass index, smoking status, insurance status, number of comorbidities, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, number of levels fused, time since surgery, and preoperative ODI score were assessed. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to look for demographic and perioperative factors associated with clinical outcome.

RESULTS

All patients except one (98%) showed complete fusion on radiography at 1 year. Estimated blood loss and duration of surgery were significantly associated with higher postoperative ODI scores (P = .002 and P = .019, respectively). Smoking status, salary insurance status, age, body mass index, number of comorbidities, number of levels fused, time since surgery, and preoperative ODI score were not significantly associated with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Porous nitinol permitted fusion rates similar to those reported in the literature for alternative fusion cages. Poor functional outcome of patients was strongly associated with intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery. We believe that estimated blood loss should be carefully evaluated in studies of postoperative outcome, as it may affect midterm outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Surgical Case Order Has an Effect on the Risk of Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a serious complication with multiple etiologies. Prior spine literature has shown that later cases in the day were more likely to develop surgical site infection. However, the effect of case order on PJI after TJA is unknown. This study aims to determine the influence of case order, prior infected case, and terminal cleaning on the risk for a subsequent PJI.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-institution study was conducted on 31,499 TJAs performed from 2000 to 2014. Case order was determined by case start times per date within the same operating room. PJI was defined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for a subsequent PJI.

RESULTS

Noninfected cases followed an infected case in 92 of 31,499 cases (0.29%) and were more likely to develop PJI (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.43; P = .029). However, terminal cleaning after infected cases did not affect the risk for PJI in cases the following morning (OR, 1.42; P = .066). Case order had an OR of 0.98 (P = .655), implying that later cases did not have a higher likelihood of infection.

CONCLUSION

Although surgical case order is not an independent risk factor for subsequent PJI, TJA cases following an infected case in the same room on the same day have a higher infection risk. Despite improved sterile technique and clean air operating rooms, the risk of contaminating a TJA with pathogens from a prior infected case appears to be high. Terminal cleaning appears to be effective in reducing the bioburden in the operating room.

[A continuous series of 27 adult patients treated for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis by combined approach: Clinical and radiological outcomes at 1 year follow-up]

Through this single-center consecutive prospective study, we evaluated the results of a combined approach for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis, using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody lordotic cage during anterior approach and pedicle screw-based posterior fixation. Between 2010 and 2014, 27 adult patients were treated for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis (high and low grades) by a combined approach with a minimum follow-up of one year. Clinical outcome was assessed before surgical treatment and at four months and one year after surgery by: VAS, Oswestry Index (ODI) and Rolland-Morris scores. Two observers evaluated the following radiological parameters: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis L5-S1, anterior and posterior disc height, spinal vertical axis (SVA), SVA/sacro-femoral distance (SFD) ratio. Fusion was evaluated on the CT scan at one-year follow-up. Blood loss, surgery time and complications were also collected. The mean age was 47.7 years (±16.9). The VAS, ODI and Rolland-Morris scores were significantly improved postoperatively, decreased from 7.5 (±1.45); 48 (±19.25); 15.3 (±4.67) before the surgery to 3.8 (±2.55); 28.7 (±19.58) and 7.76 (±7.21) respectively at one year after the surgery (P=0.05). The mean follow-up was 3.3 years. Mean surgery time was 193.7min (±37). Fusion was obtained in 100% of cases. Segmental lordosis L5-S1, pelvic tilt, slippage, anterior and posterior L5-S1 disc height were significantly improved postoperatively, they passed from 20.1; 22.6; 35.3%; 26.4%; 17.9% to 29.5; 20.6; 20.3%; 64.4%; 36.3% respectively. Combined surgical procedure meets the required goals of surgery in the treatment of adults L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.

A Multidisciplinary Infection Control Bundle to Reduce the Number of Spinal Cord Stimulator Infections

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a quality improvement project that resulted in an infection control bundle to reduce the number of spinal cord stimulator (SCS) infections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed in a single center for neuromodulation from January 1, 2014, through May 31, 2016. In response to a high number of surgical site infections (SSIs) after SCS surgery, a multidisciplinary team analyzed the surgical process and developed an infection prevention bundle consisting of five items: 1) showering and decolonization for five days prior to surgery and showering in the hospital on the morning of surgery; 2) performing the SCS implantation as the first in the daily operating room (OR) program; 3) maintaining a minimal number of people in the OR; 4) providing home care nurses with a folder with SCS wound care instructions including pictures; 5) giving oral specific wound care instructions to patients. The number of infections was calculated for the baseline, implementation, and sustainability phases.

RESULTS

A total of 410 SCS surgeries were performed during the study period. In the preintervention phase, 26/249 (10.4%) SCS surgeries were infected. During the implementation and sustainability phase, 2/59 (3.4%) and 1/102 (1.0%) SCS surgeries were infected, respectively. The reduction in the number of infections in pre and postintervention phase was statistically significant (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary measures to reduce SSIs reduced the number of SCS associated infections in our study setting.

Insurance status and reportable quality metrics in the cervical spine fusion population

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The incidence of adverse care quality events among patients undergoing cervical fusion surgery is unknown using the definition of care quality employed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The effect of insurance status on the incidence of these adverse quality events is also unknown.

PURPOSE

This study determined the incidence of hospital-acquired conditions (HAC) and patient safety indicators (PSI) in patients with cervical spine fusion and analyzed the association between primary payer status and these adverse events.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort design.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) aged 18 and older who underwent cervical spine fusion from 1998 to 2011 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of HAC and PSI from 1998 to 2011 served as outcome variables.

METHODS

We queried the NIS for all hospitalizations that included a cervical fusion during the inpatient episode from 1998 to 2011. All comparisons were made between privately insured patients and Medicaid or self-pay patients because Medicare enrollment is confounded with age. Incidence of nontraumatic HAC and PSI was determined using publicly available lists of International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. We built logistic regression models to determine the effect of primary payer status on PSI and nontraumatic HAC.

RESULTS

We identified 419,424 hospitalizations with cervical fusion performed during an inpatient episode. The estimated national incidences of nontraumatic HAC and PSI were 0.35% and 1.6%, respectively. After adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, Medicaid or self-pay patients had significantly greater odds of experiencing one or more HAC (odds ratio [OR] 1.51 95% conflict of interest [CI] 1.23-1.84) or PSI (OR 1.52 95% CI 1.37-1.70) than the privately insured cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing inpatient cervical fusion, primary payer status predicts PSI and HAC (both indicators of adverse health-care quality used to determine hospital reimbursement by CMS). As the US health-care system transitions to a value-based payment model, the cause of these disparities must be studied to improve the quality of care delivered to vulnerable patient populations.

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INFECTIONS IN SPINAL SURGERY

ABSTRACT Objective: To identify the factors associated with postoperative infections in spinal surgery. Methods: Descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study conducted in the spine surgery department of the Medical Unit of High Specialty (UMAE) at the Hospital of Traumatology and Orthopedics Lomas Verdes, Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) between January 01, 2013 and June 30, 2014 through medical records of the service and the records of clinical care. Data were gathered in accordance with the records of patients with infection after spinal surgery. The factors considered were age group, etiologic agent, surgical site, type of treatment, bleeding volume and pharmacotherapy. Frequency and descriptive statistic was conducted. The rank sum test with the Wilcoxon test for a single sample was performed in different measurements; Pearson's correlation was calculated and all p<0.05 values were considered significant. Results: The sample was composed of 14 patients of which 11 were female (78.6%) and 3 male (21.4%) with predominance of surgical area in the lumbar and dorsolumbar region. There was a significant correlation between the surgical time and the amount of bleeding with p<0.001. Conclusions: It was clear that the infections present in patients after spinal surgery are multifactorial. However, in this study the correlation between time of surgery and bleeding amount had the highest importance and relevance.

Diagnosis and neurologic status as predictors of surgical site infection in primary cervical spinal surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgical site infection (SSI) incidence after cervical spinal surgery ranges from 0.1% to 17%. Although the general risk factors for SSI have been discussed, the relationship of neurologic status and trauma to SSI has not been explicitly explored.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to study associated risk factors and to report the incidence of SSI in patients who have undergone cervical spinal surgery with the following four preoperative diagnoses: (1) degenerative disease with no myelopathy (MP), (2) degenerative disease with MP, (3) traumatic cervical injury without spinal cord injury (SCI), (4) traumatic cervical injury with SCI. We hypothesize that SSI incidence would increase from Group (1) to Group (4).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis was carried out.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

We used International Classification of Diseases codes to identify the four groups of patients in the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from the years 2000 to 2011. We complemented this study with a similar search in our institutional database (ID) from the years 2000 to 2013. Patients with concomitant congenital deformity, infection, inflammatory disease, and neoplasia were excluded, as were revision surgeries.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome studied was the occurrence of SSI. Statistical analyses included bivariate comparisons and chi-square distribution of demographic data and multivariable regression for demographic, surgical, and outcome variables.

RESULTS

A total of 1,247,281 and 5,540 patients met inclusion criteria in the NIS database and the ID, respectively. Overall SSI incidence was 0.73% (NIS) versus 1.75% (ID). Surgical site infection incidence increased steadily from 0.52% in Group (1) to 1.97% in Group (4) in the NIS data and from 0.88% to 5.54% in the ID. Differences between diagnostic groups and cohorts reached statistical significance. Surgical site infection was predicted significantly by status (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, p<.0001) and trauma (OR 1.30, p=.0003) in the NIS data. Other significant predictors included the following: approach, number of levels fused, female gender, black race, medium size hospital, rural hospital, large hospital, western US hospital and Medicare coverage. In the ID, only trauma (OR 2.11, p=.03) reached significance when accounting for comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Both primary diagnosis (trauma vs. degenerative) and neurologic status (MP or SCI) were found to be strong and independent predictors of SSI in cervical spine surgery.

Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005-2012

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior cervical surgery has been reported as high as 18% in the literature. Few large studies have specifically examined posterior cervical procedures.

PURPOSE

The study aims to examine the incidence, timing, and risk factors for SSI following posterior cervical surgery.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data in a national surgical outcomes database.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample includes patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery between 2005 and 2012 identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use Data File.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The 30-day rate of postoperative SSI, timing of diagnosis, and associated risk factors were determined.

METHODS

The ACS NSQIP was used to identify 5,441 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery by Current Procedural Terminology codes from 2005 to 2012. Thirty-day readmission data were obtained for 2011-2012. The incidence and timing of SSI were determined. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify significant risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 5,441 patients identified as having undergone posterior cervical surgery, 3,724 had a posterior cervical decompression, 1,310 had a posterior cervical fusion, and 407 underwent cervical laminoplasty. Surgical site infection within 30 days was identified in 160 patients (2.94%), with 80 of those cases being superficial SSI. There was no significant difference in SSI rate among the three procedure groups. The average time for diagnosis of SSI was over 2 weeks. In 2011-2012, 36.9% of patients with SSI were readmitted within 30 days. Several significant predictors of SSI were identified in univariate analysis, including body mass index (BMI) >35, chronic steroid use, albumin <3, hematocrit <33, platelets <100, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, longer operative time, and longer hospital admission. Independent risk factors, including BMI >35 (odds ratio [OR]=1.78, p=.003), chronic steroid use (OR=1.73, p=.049), and operative time >197 minutes (OR=2.08, p=.005), were identified in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimization of preoperative nutritional status, serum blood cell counts, and operative efficiency may lead to a reduction in SSI rates. Obese patients and patients on chronic steroid therapy should be counseled on elevated SSI risk.

Postoperative Spine Infections

Postoperative spinal wound infection is a potentially devastating complication after operative spinal procedures. Despite the utilization of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in recent years and improvements in surgical technique and postoperative care, wound infection continues to compromise patients’ outcome after spinal surgery. In the modern era of pending health care reform with increasing financial constraints, the financial burden of post-operative spinal infections also deserves consideration. The aim of our work is to give to the reader an updated review of the latest achievements in prevention, risk factors, diagnosis, microbiology and treatment of postoperative spinal wound infections. A review of the scientific literature was carried out using electronic medical databases Pubmed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Scopus for the years 1973-2012 to obtain access to all publications involving the incidence, risk factors, prevention, diagnosis, treatment of postoperative spinal wound infections. We initially identified 119 studies; of these 60 were selected. Despite all the measures intended to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections in spine surgery, these remain a common and potentially dangerous complication.

Management of wound infection after lumbar arthrodesis maintaining the instrumentation

<sec><title>OBJECTIVE:</title><p> To determinate whether a surgical protocol with immediate extensive debridement, closed irrigation system and antibiotic therapy would be effective to achieve healing of deep wound infection without removing the instrumentation.</p></sec><sec><title>METHODS:</title><p> Prospective cohort study with 19 patients presenting degenerative spinal stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis, who developed infection after posterior lumbar arthrodesis. The diagnosis was confirmed by a microbial culture from subfascial lumbar fluid and/or blood. Patients were treated with a protocol of wound exploration, extensive flushing and debridement, placement of a closed irrigation system that was maintained for five days and intravenous antibiotics. The instrumentation system was not removed.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS:</title><p> Mean age was 59.31 (±13.17) years old and most patients were female (94.7%; 18/19). The mean period for the identification of the infection was 2 weeks and 57.9% underwent a single wound exploration. White blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein showed a significant decrease post-treatment when compared to pre-treatment values. A significant reduction of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein was also observed at the final evaluation. No laboratory test was useful to predict the need for more than one debridement.</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION:</title><p> Patients with wound infection after instrumentation can be treated without removal of the instrumentation through wound exploration, extensive flushing, debridement of necrotic tissue, closed irrigation system during 5 days and proper antibiotic therapy. The blood tests were not useful to predict surgical re-interventions.</p></sec>

What is new in the diagnosis and prevention of spine surgical site infections

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal surgery can result in several serious secondary complications, such as pseudoarthrosis, neurological injury, paralysis, sepsis, and death. There is an increasing body of literature on risk factors, diagnosis, and specific intraoperative interventions, including attention to sterility of instrumentation, application of minimally invasive fusion techniques, intraoperative irrigation, and application of topical antibiotics, that hold the most promise for reduction of SSI.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to identify and summarize the recent literature on the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of SSIs after adult spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

The study design included systematic review and literature synthesis.

METHODS

For the systematic reviews, a search was performed in Medline and Scopus using keywords derived from a preliminary review of the literature and Medline MeSH terms. These studies were then manually filtered to meet the study criteria outlined in each section. Studies were excluded via predetermined criteria, and the majority of articles reviewed were excluded.

RESULTS

There are a number of patient- and procedure-specific risk factors for SSI. Surgical site infection appears to have significant implications from the patients' perspective on outcome of care. Diagnosis of SSI appears to rely primarily on clinical factors, while laboratory values such as C-reactive protein are not universally sensitive. Similarly, novel methods of perioperative infection prophylaxis such as local antibiotic administration appear to be modestly effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical site infections are a common multifactorial problem after spine surgery. There is compelling evidence that improved risk stratification, detection, and prevention will reduce SSIs.

Experience with intrawound vancomycin powder for posterior cervical fusion surgery

OBJECT

Recent studies have reported that the local delivery of vancomycin powder is associated with a decrease in spinal surgical site infection. This retrospective cohort study compares posterior cervical fusion cases before and after the routine application of spinal vancomycin powder to evaluate the ability of local vancomycin powder to prevent deep wound infection after posterior cervical spinal fusion.

METHODS

Posterior cervical fusion spinal surgeries performed at a single institution were reviewed from January 2011 to July 2013. Each cohort's baseline characteristics, operative data, and rates of wound infection were compared. Associations between infection and vancomycin powder, with and without propensity score adjustment for risk factors, were determined using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients (174 untreated and 115 treated with vancomycin powder) were included in the study. The cohorts were similar in terms of baseline and operative variables. No significant change in deep wound infection rate was seen between the control group (6.9%) and intervention group (5.2%, p = 0.563). Logistic regression, with and without propensity score adjustment, demonstrated that the use of vancomycin powder did not impact the development of surgical site infection (OR 0.743 [95% CI 0.270–2.04], p = 0.564) and (OR 0.583 [95% CI 0.198–1.718], p = 0.328), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of an ongoing debate on the effectiveness of locally administered vancomycin powder, the authors found no significant difference in the incidence of deep wound infection rates after posterior cervical fusion surgery with routine use of locally applied vancomycin powder. Future prospective randomized series are needed to corroborate these results.

Lumbar-sacral fusion by a combined approach using interbody PEEK cage and posterior pedicle-screw fixation: clinical and radiological results from a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

This prospective series evaluated the clinical and radiological results of a circumferential lumbar fusion achieved by a combined approach in one stage (anterior then posterior) using interbody PEEK cages and posterior pedicle-screw fixation.

HYPOTHESIS

The combined approach in one stage is a safe and efficient technique with few complications to achieve a fusion with a satisfying clinical and radiological outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine consecutive patients were prospectively included, with a one-year clinical and radiological minimum follow-up, from December 2008 to July 2011. All patients suffering from degenerative disc disease or low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis requiring L5S1, L4L5 or L4S1 spinal fusions were included. Clinical outcome was assessed using VAS, ODI and Rolland-Morris scores. Radiological outcome was assessed by analyzing PI, PT, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc height, C7/CSFD ratio on full spine radiographies and the quality of bone fusion on a CT scan at 1-year follow-up. Blood loss, surgery time and adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (74%) were operated for a lumbar degenerative disc disease and 10 patients (26%) for an isthmic spondylolisthesis. Mean age was 46 (± 10.1) years old. Clinical outcome were satisfactory. VAS, ODI and Rolland-Morris scores substantially improved. Mean follow-up was 22.5 months (± 8.7). Mean surgery time was 227 min (± 41.4) for complete surgical procedure time. Mean blood loss was 308 mL (± 179.2) for total surgery. Fusion was assessed in all cases. Disc height and segmental lordosis significantly improved in postoperative. The segmental lordosis at operated level(s) increased by 8.5° (± 5) regardless of the level, and by 11.6° (± 6) for L5-S1.

CONCLUSION

The combined procedure meets the requested criteria for a lumbar fusion in terms of clinical and functional results, fusion rates, and restoration of segmental lordosis. It cumulates the advantages of the anterior and posterior approach performed alone and should be considered by surgeons before realizing a lumbar fusion.

A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery

OBJECTIVE

To identify the independent risk factors, based on available evidence in the literature, for patients developing surgical site infections (SSI) after spinal surgery.

METHODS

Non-interventional studies evaluating the independent risk factors for patients developing SSI following spinal surgery were searched in Medline, Embase, Sciencedirect and OVID. The quality of the included studies was assessed by a modified quality assessment tool that had been previously designed for observational studies. The effects of studies were combined with the study quality score using a best-evidence synthesis model.

RESULTS

Thirty-six observational studies involving 2,439 patients with SSI after spinal surgery were identified. The included studies covered a wide range of indications and surgical procedures. These articles were published between 1998 and 2012. According to the quality assessment criteria for included studies, 15 studies were deemed to be high-quality studies, 5 were moderate-quality studies, and 16 were low-quality studies. A total of 46 independent factors were evaluated for risk of SSI. There was strong evidence for six factors, including obesity/BMI, longer operation times, diabetes, smoking, history of previous SSI and type of surgical procedure. We also identified 8 moderate-evidence, 31 limited-evidence and 1 conflicting-evidence factors.

CONCLUSION

Although there is no conclusive evidence for why postoperative SSI occurs, these data provide evidence to guide clinicians in admitting patients who will have spinal operations and to choose an optimal prophylactic strategy. Further research is still required to evaluate the effects of these above risk factors.

Infection following operations on the central nervous system: deconstructing the myth of the sterile field

Neurosurgical patients are at a high risk for infectious sequelae following operations. For neurosurgery in particular, the risk of surgical site infection has a unique implication given the proximity of the CSF and the CNS. Patient factors contribute to some degree; for example, cancer and trauma are often associated with impaired nutritional status, known risk factors for infection. Additionally, care-based factors for infection must also be considered, such as the length of surgery, the administration of steroids, and tissue devascularization (such as a craniotomy bone flap). When postoperative infection does occur, attention is commonly focused on potential lapses in surgical “sterility.” Evidence suggests that the surgical field is not free of microorganisms. The authors propose a paradigm shift in the nomenclature of the surgical field from “sterile” to “clean.” Continued efforts aimed at optimizing immune capacity and host defenses to combat potential infection are warranted.