Intraoperative skull-femoral (skeletal) traction in surgical correction of severe scoliosis (>80°) in adult neglected scoliosis

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Severe and Neglected Spinal Deformities in Children and Adolescents without the Use of Radical Three-Column Osteotomies

Background: Severe spinal deformity manifests as a pronounced deviation from the normal curvature of the spine in the frontal, sagittal, and horizontal planes, where the coronal plane curvature exceeds 90 degrees and may coincide with hyperkyphotic deformity. The most severe deformities exhibit rigidity, with flexibility below 30%. If left untreated or improperly treated, these deformities can result in serious complications associated with progression of the curvature. A combination of surgical techniques is frequently employed to attain optimal outcomes and minimize the risk of complications. The overall medical condition of the patient, their capacity to endure extensive procedures, the expertise of the surgeon, and the resources available all play significant roles in determining the course of management. A systematic and thorough review of the relevant literature was conducted utilizing a variety of electronic databases. The primary objective of this study was to scrutinize the surgical techniques commonly employed in complex spine surgeries for the management of severe scoliosis without resection vertebral body techniques, with higher potential risk of major complications, including permanent neurological deficit. Conclusions: Halo-gravity traction, halo femoral traction, and all techniques for releases of the spine (anterior, posterior, or combine), as well as thoracoplasty, have demonstrated significant effectiveness in managing severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. The combination of several of these methods can lead to optimal alignment correction without the need to perform high-risk techniques involving three-column osteotomies. Surgeons must customize the indications based on factors such as available resources, characteristics of the deformity, and the patient's individual profile. Surgical correction of severe scoliosis without vertebral body resection surgeries decreases the potential risks related to neurological and pulmonary complications while providing significant clinical improvement outcomes. The powerful Ponte osteotomy is indicated for severe scoliosis, curves with poor flexibility, for better restoration of hypokyphosis, and decrease of hyperkyphosis. These corrective techniques combined with HGT or temporary internal distraction rods are recommended as viable options for managing individuals with severe rigid spine deformity characteristics. Therefore, they also should be considered and performed by a proficient surgical team. The presence of neuromonitoring is crucial throughout these procedures.

A Novel Multiple Screw Distraction Reducer System in the Treatment of Scoliosis with a Severe Rib Hump

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of scoliosis with a severe rib hump remains a major challenge. Traditional vertebral rotation techniques are not satisfactory, and thoracoplasty has many pulmonary complications that limit its application. A novel surgical device, the multiple screw distraction reducer (MSDR) system, provides longitudinal distraction during the corrective operation while at the same time providing lateral translation and axial derotation, which may facilitate the correction of a rib hump. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of the MSDR system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a severe rib hump.

METHODS

This was a case-matched study of patients with retrospectively collected data from our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. Sixty-eight patients who underwent one-stage posterior pedicle screw-instrumented spinal fusion were matched by the Cobb angle of the main curve and rib hump. All patients underwent a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: the MSDR group (using the MSDR system, n = 34) and the DVR group (using direct vertebral derotation, n = 34). The patients were evaluated for the height of the rib hump, deformity correction, complications, and SRS-30 scores. The unpaired Student's t-test and Pearson's χ2 -test were used to compare the outcome measures between the two groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the variables that affected the correction of a rib hump.

RESULTS

The rib hump was 30.21 ± 6.21 mm versus 29.35 ± 6.52 mm (p = 0.583) preoperatively and 9.18 ± 4.06 mm versus 13.82 ± 5.54 mm (p < 0.001) at the last follow-up in the MSDR and DVR groups, respectively. The correction rates were 70.83% and 53.56%, respectively (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, the main thoracic curve was 58.43° ± 7.97° and 57.84° ± 6.32° (p = 0.736) and was corrected to 10.92° ± 5.47° and 19.14° ± 5.32° (p < 0.001) at last follow-up in the MSDR and DVR group, respectively. Thoracic kyphosis was restored from 18.24° ± 5.19° and 17.98° ± 5.28° (p = 0.836) in the MSDR and DVR group to 24.59° ± 4.41° and 19.32° ± 4.96° (p < 0.001), respectively. Correction of apical vertebra rotation and translation in the main thoracic curve were significantly better in the MSDR group than in the DVR group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the Lenke type, implant density, estimated blood loss, or follow-up duration between the two groups, whereas the operation time in the DVR group was significantly less than that in the MSDR group. There were only two minor pulmonary complications in the MSDR group. At the last follow-up, the MSDR group scored higher in terms of appearance and satisfaction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The MSDR system, enabling better coronal alignment, thoracic kyphosis, and axial derotation, could be a safe and effective technique for severe rib hump correction in AIS.

Comparison of Overall Complication Rates in VCR-Based vs Non-VCR-Based Corrective Techniques in Severe Rigid Kyphoscoliosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Compilation of complication outcomes data from the surgical management of severe rigid kyphoscoliosis patients using VCR-based vs non-VCR-based corrective maneuvers is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to compare complication outcomes between those classified osteotomy approaches.

METHODS

Thorough literature review and meta-analysis were conducted between January 2000 and September 2021. The selection criteria were studies: i) reporting major curve Cobb angle of ≥80° and flexibility of <25% or 30%; ii) comparing VCR or ≥ Type V Schwab osteotomy defined as VCR-based vs [non-VCR-based] techniques, (any osteotomy or technique other than VCR); iii) published in English with ≥10 patients; iv) reporting complication rates; and v) having minimum of 2-year follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Significance level was set at (P < .05).

RESULTS

Of the 174 patients included, 52.30% (n = 91) and 47.70% (n = 83) were VCR-based and non-VCR-based, respectively. The incidence of dural tears/nerve injuries/significant intraoperative-neuromonitoring changes was significantly higher; [OR = 6.78, CI= (1.75 to 26.17), I2 = 0%, (P = .006)] in the VCR-based group than the non-VCR-based group. The 'overall surgical and medical' complication rate was significantly higher in the VCR-based group, [OR = 1.94, CI= (1.02 to 3.67), I2 = 31%, (P = .04)].

CONCLUSION

Both VCR-based and non-VCR-based surgical techniques for management of severe rigid scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis patients pose comparable overall surgical complication rates, while a significantly higher perioperative neurological complication incidence was associated with VCR-based technique compared to the non-VCR-based techniques. The VCR-based technique was associated with 6.78 times higher incidence of neurological complications compared to non-VCR-based techniques.

Apical region correction and global balance: a 3-rods surgical strategy for the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis

Background

The treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis is challenging. We developed a surgical strategy for severe and rigid scoliosis since 2014. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the safety and efficacy of apical region correction and global balance with 3 rods as a surgical strategy for the treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed for patients with severe and rigid scoliosis who underwent one-stage posterior corrective operation using the apical region correction and global balance with 3 rods surgical strategy between February 2014 and April 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: [1] Cobb angle > 90°; [2] flexibility < 30%; [3] a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were excluded if they had a history of traction or spinal surgery. Coronal and sagittal parameters, including Cobb angle, flexibility, apex vertebra translation, trunk shift (TS), thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final follow-up. The Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire was administered preoperatively and at the final follow-up. During the operation, one slightly-bent short rod was placed into the concave side of apical region and correction was achieved by rod-rotation and distraction. Two pre-bent long rods were placed into both sides of the scoliosis and global balance was improved by leveling the proximal thoracic vertebrae and distal lumbar vertebrae.

Results

A total of 41 patients were included, with an average age of 20 years (range, 12–49 years) and follow-up of 34 months (range, 24–58 months). Postoperative correction rate was 53% for scoliosis. There were 14 patients with normal kyphosis before surgery, and 28 patients with normal kyphosis at the last follow-up. 88% of the patients (23/26) with preoperative coronal imbalance (TS > 20 mm) restored coronal balance at the final follow-up. 87% of the patients (14/16) with preoperative sagittal imbalance (SVA > 40 mm) restored sagittal balance at the final follow-up. The mean operation time and blood loss were 286 min and 941 mL, respectively. No patients had neurological complications or implant failure.

Conclusion

The surgical strategy of apical region correction and global balance with 3 rods is a safe and effective alternative for the surgical treatment of severe and rigid scoliosis.

Halo traction combined with posterior-only approach correction for cervical kyphosis with Neurofibromatosis-1: minimum 2 years follow-up

Background

Surgical management of cervical kyphosis in patients with NF-1 is a challenging task. Presently, anterior-only (AO), posterior-only (PO) and combined anterior-posterior (AP) spinal fusion are common surgical strategies. However, the choice of surgical strategy and application of Halo traction remain controversial. Few studies have shown and recommended posterior-only approach for cervical kyphosis correction in patients with NF-1. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and the effectiveness of halo Traction combined with posterior-only approach correction for treatment of cervical kyphosis with NF-1.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with severe cervical kyphosis due to NF-1 were reviewed retrospectively between January 2010 and April 2018. All the cases underwent halo traction combined with posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery. Correction result, neurologic status and complications were analyzed.

Results

In this study, cervical kyphosis Cobb angle decreased from initial 61.3 ± 19.7 degrees to postoperative 10.6 ± 3.7 degrees (P<0.01), with total correction rate of 82.7%, which consist of 45.8% from halo traction and 36.9% from surgical correction. JOA scores were improved from preoperative 13.3 ± 1.6 to postoperative 16.2 ± 0.7 (P<0.01). Neurological status was also improved. There was no correction loss and the neurological status was stable in mean 43 months follow-up. Three patients experienced minor complications and one patient underwent a second surgery.

Conclusion

Halo traction combined with PO approach surgery is safe and effective method for cervical kyphosis correction in patients with NF-1. A satisfied correction result, and successful bone fusion can be achieved via this procedure, even improvement of neurological deficits can also be obtained. Our study suggested that halo traction combined with PO approach surgery is another consideration for cervical kyphosis correction in patients with NF-1.

Intraoperative halo-femoral traction during posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves between 70° and 100°: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Surgical management of scoliosis curves between 70° and 100° remains controversial. The authors designed this randomized controlled trial to validate the efficacy of intraoperative halo-femoral traction (IOHFT) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Cobb angles between 70° and 100°, and flexibility < 35%.

METHODS

The authors prospectively recruited and randomized 29 patients with severe AIS scheduled for posterior surgery into a traction group or control (nontraction) group. The primary outcome measures were operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included degree of spine deformity correction, traction-related complications, and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

In the traction group, the average preoperative Cobb angle was 83.2°, with an average 20.6% flexibility. The average postoperative Cobb angle was 16.1° and the major curve was 18.3° at the final follow-up. In the control group, the average preoperative major curve was 80.3° with 22.8% flexibility. The average postoperative Cobb angle was 16.1° and the major curve was 18.1° at the final follow-up. The operative duration was 325.7 minutes for the traction group and 385.4 minutes for the control group (p = 0.018). Compared with the control group, the traction group had a 29.5% reduction in intraoperative blood loss and a significantly lower rate of blood transfusion (13.3% vs 50.0%, p = 0.033). There were no neurological complications in either group. One patient in the traction group had a superficial infection at the traction site.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of IOHFT contributed to significant reductions in operative time and blood transfusion requirements, with no added morbidity. It is an effective and safe method to assist correction of AIS curves between 70° and 100° and flexibility < 35%.

Matching correction of main and compensatory curves is critical for immediate postoperative coronal balance in correction of severe adult idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To analyze the correlation between immediate postoperative coronal imbalance and the matching degree of the correction rates of the main curve and compensatory curves in the surgical treatment of severe adult idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

Patients were categorized into three types based on the preoperative coronal balance status (type A = balance, type B = shifted to cave side and type C = shifted to convex side), and each type was further divided into two subgroups based on the postoperative coronal balance status (balance and imbalance). Different coronal parameters before and after operations were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The rate of postoperative CIB was highest in type C patients (53.8%) and lowest in type A patients (31.5%). To avoid postoperative CIB, the value of the postoperative CR_main should fall within the range of 1.001 × CR_comp ± 2.84% in type A patients, 1.112 × CR_comp + 3.3% ± 5.02% in type B patients and 0.907 × CR_comp - 2.5% ± 4.38% in type C patients.

CONCLUSION

Mismatch between the correction rates of the main curve and compensation curves is a critical cause of immediate postoperative CIB. The relatively equal correction of the main curve and compensatory curves is essential for type A patients to achieve postoperative coronal balance, while the correction rate of the main curve should be higher than the compensatory curves in type B patients and vice versa in type C patients. Three formulas for the three different types were developed to provide helpful guidance information for surgical planning.

Impact of Various Weights in the Intraoperative Skull-Skeletal Traction on Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative skull-skeletal traction (ISST) facilitates the surgical scoliosis correction, but it is also associated with neurological risk. The objective of the present study was to investigate the impact of various traction weights on neurophysiological change and curve correction in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a consecutive series of posterior spinal fusions for AIS patients undergoing corrections with the use of ISST by 2 surgeons in one institution was performed. Intraoperative prone, post-traction radiographs were performed on all cases. The cases were divided into 2 groups, high and low traction weights, based on whether the weight used was ≥35% or <35% of body weight. The frequency of neurophysiological changes and the curve correction were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The intraoperative correction magnitudes by ISST were significantly larger in the high ISST group than in the low ISST group (35° vs 26°, P < .001). Changes in motor-evoked potential (MEP) were more frequently observed in the high ISST group (47% vs 26%, P = .049). A multivariate analysis showed that high ISST was associated with 3 times higher risk of MEP change (95% confidence interval = 1.1-8.0, P = .03) and higher final postoperative correction rates (68% vs 60%, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The high ISST for AIS was associated with increased intraoperative and ultimate curve corrections, and potentially facilitated better final correction. However, the high weight group was associated with an increased frequency of intraoperative MEP changes.

Analysis of the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis

Introduction

Strong halo-femoral traction has been widely used in the field of severe rigid scoliosis correction. The objective of this study was to analyze the corrective contribution of strong halo-femoral traction in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis and discuss its meaning.

Material and methods

A retrospective review was performed for patients with severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis who were treated with halo-femoral traction in our center from December 2008 to December 2015. All cases underwent halo-femoral traction for 2 to 4 weeks before a one-stage posterior operation, and the absolute and relative contribution rates of each orthopedic factor (bending, fulcrum, traction, surgery) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 38 patients were included (15 males and 23 females), with a mean age of 16.4 ± 3.73 years (10–22 years) and follow-up of 55.05 ± 6.63 months (range 40–68 months). The etiology was congenital in 17 patients, neuromuscular in 14 patients, neurofibromatosis-1 in 3 patients, and Marfan syndrome in 2 patients. Congenital high scapular disease with scoliosis was found in 2 patients. The mean coronal Cobb angle of the major curve was 97.99° ± 11.47° (range 78°–124°), with a mean flexibility of 15.68% ± 6.65%. The absolute contribution rate (ACR) of bending was 27.26% ± 10.16%, the ACR of the fulcrum was 10.91% ± 2.50%, the ACR of traction was 32.32% ± 11.41%, and the ACR of surgery was 29.50% ± 9.70%. A significant difference in correction was noted between the ACRs of traction and the fulcrum (P < 0.05).

Discussion

Strong halo-femoral traction plays a relatively significant role in the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis while decreasing the risk of operation, and it is a safe and effective method for the treatment of severe rigid nonidiopathic scoliosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-020-02093-8.

Skull-femoral traction after posterior release for correction of adult severe scoliosis: efficacy and complications

Background

It is a great challenge for spine surgeons to correct severe rigid scoliosis. We developed a three- staged correction (one stage posterior release and screw placement, two stage skull-femoral traction and three stage posterior instrumentation) for adult severe scoliosis. The objective of this study is to investigate safety and efficacy of a three- staged correction for adult severe scoliosis.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for patients with severe scoliosis receiving three- staged correction (one stage posterior release and screw placement, two stage skull-femoral traction and three stage posterior instrumentation) from June 2001 to October 2014. The inclusion criteria were as follows: [1] age more than 18 years; [2] main curve larger than 90°; [3] a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were excluded if they had a history of surgery or anterior release or receiving three column osteotomies.

Results

A total of 63 patients were included (37 female and 26 male), with a mean age of 22.7 years (range: 18–30 years) and follow-up of 42.6 months (range: 24–108 months). The aetiology was congenital in 27 patients, neuromuscular in 18, idiopathic in 11, neurofibromatosis-1 in 4 and Marfan syndrome in 3. The mean traction weight was 28.4 kg (range: 18–32 kg), equal to 57.2% of patients’ body weight (range: 42.7–72.3%). The mean traction time was 22.7 days (range: 12–44 days). Postoperative correction rate was 55% (range: 38–78%) for scoliosis and 51% (range: 32–75%) for kyphosis. Contribution of traction to correction was 51% (range: 36–70%) for scoliosis and was 43% (range: 34–55%) for kyphosis.

Conclusions

Three- staged correction (one stage posterior release and screw placement, two stage skull-femoral traction and three stage posterior instrumentation) could effectively correct adult severe scoliosis. The incidence of complications of skull-femoral traction was not low, but transient and could be successfully managed.

Current concepts in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a complex 3D deformity of the spine. Its prevalence is between 2% and 3% in the general population, with almost 10% of patients requiring some form of treatment and up to 0.1% undergoing surgery. The cosmetic aspect of the deformity is the biggest concern to the patient and is often accompanied by psychosocial distress. In addition, severe curves can cause cardiopulmonary distress. With proven benefits from surgery, the aims of treatment are to improve the cosmetic and functional outcomes. Obtaining correction in the coronal plane is not the only important endpoint anymore. With better understanding of spinal biomechanics and the long-term effects of multiplanar imbalance, we now know that sagittal balance is equally, if not more, important. Better correction of deformities has also been facilitated by an improvement in the design of implants and a better understanding of metallurgy. Understanding the unique character of each deformity is important. In addition, using the most appropriate implant and applying all the principles of correction in a bespoke manner is important to achieve optimum correction.

In this article, we review the current concepts in AIS surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:415–24.

Intraoperative skull-femoral traction in posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the impact on perioperative outcomes and health resource utilization

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To study how the systematic use of intraoperative skull-femoral traction (IOSFT) in posterior arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis impacts perioperative outcomes and health resource utilization.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Large scoliosis curves have been associated with increased morbidity and utilization of health resources. When used with reliable neurophysiological monitoring, IOSFT has shown to be safe and to reduce curve magnitude intraoperatively. Thus, we hypothesized that the systematic use of IOSFT may contribute to reducing health resource utilization by reducing curve magnitudes intraoperatively.

METHODS

Seventy-three consecutive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent single-stage posterior spinal arthrodesis from 2008 to 2012 at a tertiary children's hospital were identified. Forty-five patients were operated with IOSFT (traction group) and 28 patients were operated without IOSFT (nontraction group). Outcome measures included operative time, calculated blood loss, blood transfusion requirement, traction-related complications, and cost comparisons.

RESULTS

Operative time was 375.6 minutes for the traction group (P=0.0001) and 447.6 minutes for the nontraction group. Calculated blood loss was significantly less in the traction group (P=0.027). Thirty-three percent of patients in the traction group required blood transfusion compared with 64% of patients in the nontraction group (P=0.01, absolute risk reduction of 31%). There was no significant difference in curve magnitude correction (P=0.49). There were no significant complications with the use of traction. There was a significant reduction in cost per surgical procedure in the traction group (P=0.0003).

CONCLUSION

The systematic use of IOSFT in posterior spinal arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis contributed to significant reductions in health resource utilization, with no added morbidity. Further research is warranted to investigate the generalizability of these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.