Single-stage Transpedicular Vertebrectomy and Expandable Cage Placement for Treatment of Unstable Mid and Lower Lumbar Burst Fractures

Unilateral Pediculectomy and Reduction with Short-Segment Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment fixation and interbody fusion for thoracolumbar burst fracture. The unilateral pediculectomy created sufficient space to approach the ventral side of the spinal cord for removing bone fragments and insertion of an interbody cage to correct kyphosis. Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL, and segmental Cobb angle were measured at 3 time points: preoperatively, postoperatively, and final follow-up. Furthermore, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was measured to assess global sagittal balance at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients, with a mean age of 39.8 ± 21.0, underwent the surgical procedure. All patients had a thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score > 5. The mean follow-up period was 15.8 ± 13.9 months. The mean postoperative LL (46.0 ± 5.8) was significantly higher (P = 0.008) than the preoperative measurement (32.8 ± 8.2). The mean postoperative PI minus LL (2.2 ± 8.4) was not significantly lower (P = 0.051) than preoperative measurement (15.4 ± 12.6). The mean postoperative segmental Cobb angle (11.4 ± 8.4) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the preoperative measurement (-11.6 ± 10.9). At the final follow-up, the mean sagittal vertical axiswas 10.0 ± 28.8 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral pediculectomy and reduction with short-segment fixation and interbody fusion served as an efficient surgical method for thoracolumbar burst fracture.

Technical nuances and approach-related morbidity of anterolateral and posterolateral lumbar corpectomy approaches-a systematic review of the literature

Purpose

Approaches for lumbar corpectomies can be roughly categorized into anterolateral (AL) and posterolateral (PL) approaches. It remains controversial to date whether one approach is superior to the other, and no comparative studies exist for the two approaches for lumbar corpectomies.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed through a MEDLINE/PubMed search. Studies and case reports describing technique plus outcomes and possible complications were included. Thereafter, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of operation (LOO), utilized implants, neurological outcomes, complication rates, and reoperation rates were analyzed.

Results

A total of 64 articles reporting on 702 patients including 513 AL and 189 PL corpectomies were included in this paper. All patients in the PL group were instrumented via the same approach used for corpectomy, while in the AL group the majority (68.3%) of authors described the use of an additional approach for instrumentation. The EBL was higher in the AL group (1393 ± 1341 ml vs. 982 ± 567 ml). The LOO also was higher in the AL group (317 ± 178 min vs. 258 ± 93 min). The complication rate (20.5% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.048) and the revision rate (3.1% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.004) were higher in the PL group. Neurological improvement rates were 43.8% (AL) vs. 39.2% (PL), and deterioration was only noted in the AL group (6.0%), while 50.2% (AL) and 60.8% (PL) showed no change from initial presentation to the last follow-up.

Conclusion

While neurological outcomes of both approaches are comparable, the results of the present review demonstrated lower complication and revision rates in anterolateral corpectomies. Nevertheless, individual patient characteristics must be considered in decision-making.

Multilevel L4 and L5 Corpectomy for Burst Fracture via an Anterior Transperitoneal Approach Followed by Posterior Stabilization: Technical and Anatomic Considerations

Lower lumbar spine burst fractures make up only 1% of all lumbar spine fractures. A burst fracture with neurological compromise, ligamentous injury, severe kyphotic deformity, or loss of anterior column support typically requires surgical stabilization. Treatment options at the L4 and L5 levels are challenging and often require an anterior/posterior approach. Very little has been reported on anterior approaches to the L4 and L5 levels when a corpectomy is required. Hence, we present a patient with a complex burst fracture of L4 and L5. She underwent a corpectomy of L4 and L5 and placement of an expandable cage through a window created between the aorta and the inferior vena cava via an anterior transperitoneal abdominal approach followed by posterior stabilization and fusion from L2 to the pelvis.

Single-Stage Posterior Circumferential Stabilization Using Double Small Cages for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Controversy remains regarding the optimal methods for resection of the vertebral body, reconstruction of the anterior column, and decompression of the spinal cord in patients who have severe vertebral body destruction of the thoracic or lumbar spine with associated neurologic impairment. We report an alternative technique for primary treatment and salvage involving single-stage corpectomy followed by reconstruction of the anterior column using double small mesh cages via the posterior-only approach.

METHODS

Plain radiographs and computed tomography scans, taken at different intervals, were used to measure local kyphosis, segmental height, and fusion grade. Pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), and neurologic symptoms were classified according to Frankel grade.

RESULTS

The mean kyphotic deformity improved by 14.47 ± 9.06 degrees (P < 0.001), and the mean segmental height improved by 7.17 mm ± 6.11 mm (P < 0.001) after surgery. Fusion was achieved at 84% of patients, within a median interval of 12 months. Kyphotic recurrence was observed in 2 patients (11%), segmental height loss occurred in 1 patient (5%), and both kyphotic recurrence and segmental height loss occurred in 1 patient (5%). None of the patients reported worsening pain or neurologic symptoms after surgery, and there were no surgery-related complications such as neural injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, cage dislocation, surgical site infection, or cardiopulmonary complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage corpectomy followed by reconstruction of the anterior column using double small mesh cages via the posterior-only approach is a reliable and less invasive single-stage treatment and salvage option in selected cases.

Management of Pediatric Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Body Burst Fractures by Use of Single-Stage Posterior Transpedicular Approach

PURPOSE

The posterior transpedicular approach (PTA) is a posterior approach that has the advantage of achieving circumferential arthrodesis by a single posterior-only approach. The purpose of this study was to analyze our experience with PTA in the management of pediatric traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTLBFs).

METHODS

Consecutive pediatric patients (age ≤18 years) with TTLBFs treated with PTA for 6 years were included in this retrospective study. Correction of kyphotic deformity and change in neurologic status were analyzed to assess outcome. The Cobb angle and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade were used for this purpose.

RESULTS

There were 6 male and 8 female patients. Five patients had complete injury (ASIA-A), and 9 had incomplete injury. The mean Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score was 6.71. The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 14.71° and improved to -3.35° postoperatively (mean kyphosis correction -18.05°). Two of the patients experienced iatrogenic nerve root injury. There was 1 postoperative mortality due to complications unrelated to the surgery. The mean Cobb angle was -0.07° at the 32.2-month follow-up visit. Six patients experienced cage subsidence, but none required revision surgery. Postoperatively, 11 (78.5%) patients showed neurologic improvement, and none experienced deterioration. The average ASIA score improved from 2.5 to 3.78. A fusion rate of 100% (n = 12) was observed at the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that PTA is a feasible approach in selected pediatric patients with unstable traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures, with results comparable with those in the adult population. This study demonstrates in detail the procedure, along with the neurologic and radiologic outcomes of this approach in the pediatric population.

Combined anteroposterior fixation using a titanium cage versus solely posterior fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study Design:

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Objective:

Additional anterior stabilization might prevent posterior implant failure, but over time, the disadvantageous of bone grafts have become evident. The objective of this systematic review was to compare risks and advantages of additional anterior stabilization with a titanium cage to solely posterior fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods:

An electronic search was performed in the literature from 1980 to March 2016. Studies comparing only posterior with anteroposterior fixation by means of a titanium cage were included in this study. Data extraction and Cochrane risk of bias assessment were done by two independent authors. In addition, the PRISMA statement was followed, and the GRADE approach was used to present results.

Results:

Of the 1584 studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one retrospective cohort study were included in the meta-analysis. The RCTs reported evidence of high quality that anteroposterior stabilization maintained better kyphosis correction than posterior stabilization alone. However, these results were neutralized in the meta-analysis by the cohort study. Implant failure was reported by one study, in the posterior group. No differences in follow-up visual analog scale scores, neurologic improvement, and complications were found. Operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay all increased in the anteroposterior group.

Conclusions:

Patients with a highly comminuted or unstable fracture could benefit from combined anteroposterior stabilization with a titanium cage, for some evidence suggests this prevents loss of correction. However, large randomized studies still lack. There is a risk of cage subsidence, and increased perioperative risks have to be considered when choosing the optimal treatment.

Anterior Lumbar Corpectomy with Expandable Titanium Cage Reconstruction: A Case Series of 42 Patients

BACKGROUND

Burst fractures involve the anterior and middle columns with an intact posterior column. Deforming forces are magnified at areas of transition, making the thoracolumbar junction highly susceptible to injury.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 42 consecutive patients who underwent single-level anterior lumbar corpectomy using an obelisc expandable titanium cage and lateral fixation for traumatic lumbar burst fractures.

RESULTS

Myelopathy and sensory dysfunction were the most frequent neurologic deficits initially, occurring in 16 (38%) and 15 (36%) patients, respectively, which both decreased to 5 (13%). At follow-up, 26 patients (68%) were able to ambulate independently. No patient had significant cage displacement or needed cage replacement. Subsidence was minimal in 32 of 39 patients (82%). There were no hardware infections or surgical site infections. Options for stabilization include posterior instrumentation and fusion, anterior corpectomy with interbody fusion, and combination procedures. We believe anterior stabilization is superior because the aim is structural restoration of anterior and middle columns. The aim of posterior fixation is to replace the posterior tension band, which is not affected. There are 3 major surgical components to consider. First is anterior versus posterior decompression of the spinal canal. Second is the choice of autograft or titanium graft. Third is whether to stabilize posteriorly or anterolateral.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior corpectomy with an expandable titanium cage and lateral rod fixation is safe and effective with minimal complications. It is a viable alternative to posterior decompression and instrumentation.