Quantitative Reduction of Basilar Invagination: Correction Target of Clivo-Axial Angle

Chamberlain's Line Violation in Basilar Invagination Patients Compared with Normal Subjects: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the measured odontoid tip violation above Chamberlain's line described in the literature to diagnose basilar invagination (BI) and to establish the normal placement of the dens tip defining individuals without BI (normal subjects).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical or radiological studies that expressed the amount of odontoid violation above Chamberlain's line in patients with a BI diagnosis. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate normal subjects' values of Chamberlain's line violation (CLV).

RESULTS

There were 23 studies included (13 radiological and 10 clinical). Most studies used computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Eight different cutoff values were used to measure dislocated odontoid apexes above Chamberlain's line regardless of the radiological modality. The mean measured amount of CLV was 3.95 mm (median 5 mm; range, 0-9 mm). The meta-analysis included 8 studies (1233 patients) with a normal sample population with a mean normal CLV of -0.63 mm (below the line) (95% confidence interval [-0.8, 1.18 mm], random effects model).

CONCLUSIONS

Different values were found in the assessed studies used for CLV in BI diagnosis. This variability is especially important for type B BI, as type A BI has other craniocervical diagnostic parameters. Considering the results obtained in this meta-analysis, BI should be diagnosed in the case of any dens violation >1.18 mm.

Reference values of four measures of craniocervical stability using upright dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To establish reference ranges for four most commonly used diagnostic measures of craniocervical instability (CCI) in three cervical sagittal positions. This necessitated development of a reliable measurement protocol using upright, dynamic MRI (udMRI), to determine differences in the extent of motion between positions, and whether age and sex correlate with these measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Deidentified udMRIs of 50 adults, referred for reasons other than CCI, were captured at three positions (maximal flexion, maximal extension and neutral). Images were analyzed, providing measures of basion-axial interval, basion-axial angle, basion-dens interval (BDI) and the Grabb-Oakes line (GOL) for all three positions (12 measures per participant). All measures were independently recorded by a radiologist and neurosurgeon to determine their reliability. Descriptive statistics, correlations, paired and independent t-tests were used. Mean (± 2 SD) identified the reference range for all four measures at each craniocervical position.

RESULTS

The revised measurement protocol produced inter-rater reliability indices of 0.69-0.97 (moderate-excellent). Fifty adults' (50% male; mean age 41.2 years (± 9.7)) reference ranges for all twelve measures were reported. Except for the BDI and GOL when moving between neutral and full flexion, significant extents of movement were identified between the three craniocervical positions for all four measures (p ≤ 0.005). Only a minor effect of age was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to provide a rigorous standardized protocol for four diagnostic measures of CCI. Reference ranges are established at mid and ends of sagittal cervical range corresponding to where exacerbations of signs and symptoms are commonly reported.

Establish a new parameter "horizontal view-axial angle" and explore its role in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability diseases

Objective

The objective of the study is to establish a new parameter that can be clearly measured on x-ray images to complement the description of the sagittal alignment of the craniocervical junction. The authors anticipate that this new parameter will enhance surgeons' understanding of the sagittal alignment of the craniocervical junction and play a positive role in the guidance of intraoperative reduction and in the evaluation of postoperative outcomes of patients with atlantoaxial instability.

Methods

From November 2018 to June 2020, a total of 159 asymptomatic subjects who underwent frontal and lateral cervical x-ray examination in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were included in the study. Age, gender, previous spinal trauma, and disease history of each subject were recorded. After screening, 127 effective samples were finally obtained. When taking lateral cervical radiographs, all subjects placed their neck in a neutral position and looked straight ahead with both eyes. On the obtained lateral x-ray images, a straight line was drawn from the radix to the anterior clinoid process; another line was made along the posterior edge of the C2 vertebral body; and the angle between the two lines was measured, which was defined as the "horizontal view-axial angle." The angle formed by the tangent of the posterior edge of the C2 vertebra and C7 vertebral body is the "C2-C7 angle," which was used to describe the curvature of the lower cervical vertebra. The normal range of horizontal view-axial angle and its relationship with C2-7 angle were evaluated.

Results

The average C2-C7 angle of male subjects was (14.0° ± 7.4°), while that of female subjects was (11.09° ± 7.36°). The average horizontal view-axial angle of male subjects was (92.79° ± 4.52°), and that of female subjects was (94.29° ± 4.50°). Pearson correlation test showed that there was a significant negative correlation between horizontal view-axis angle and C2-C7 angle.

Conclusions

For patients with atlantoaxial instability diseases, the horizontal view-axis angle is expected to be a sagittal parameter to guide the intraoperative reduction and evaluate postoperative outcomes.

Relevance of C1/2 facet configurations and clivus-canal-angles for adult patients with Chiari I malformation with and without basilar invagination

OBJECTIVE

C1/2 facet configurations and clivus-canal angles (CXA) have been proposed as criteria for posterior fusion in Chiari I malformation (CMI).

METHODS

340 adults with CMI without basilar invagination (BI), 111 with CMI with BI and 100 age and sex matched controls were studied using sagittal T2-weighted MRI scans analyzing pre- and postoperative values with their impact on progression-free survival rates.

RESULTS

For CMI without BI, C1/2 facet configurations and CXA were similar to controls (142+11° and 144+10°, respectively) with low rates for posterior C1 displacements (7.1% and 10%, respectively). In CMI with BI, C1 facet displacements were common (54.9%) with lower CXA (120+15°). After foramen magnum decompression (FMD) in CMI without BI (n = 169), 1.8% developed posterior C1 facet displacements without CXA changes and a 97% progression-free survival rate for 10 years. In CMI with BI, patients without ventral compression or instability underwent FMD without fusion (n = 19). 5.3% developed a posterior C1 facet displacement without CXA changes and a 94% progression-free survival rate for 10 years. The remainder of CMI with BI underwent FMD with C1/2 fusion (n = 48). Among these, CXA values increased with 10 year progression-free survival rates of 74% and 93% with and without ventral compression, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For adult CMI without BI, C1/2 facet configurations and CXA are irrelevant. FMD alone provides excellent long-term outcomes. In CMI with BI, anterior C1 facet displacements indicate C1/2 instability. Posterior fusions can be reserved for patients with ventral compression or C1/2 instability.

Normal range of clivoaxial angle in adults using flexion and extension cervical magnetic resonance imaging scans

OBJECTIVE

An abnormally decreased clivoaxial angle (CXA) is used during the clinical evaluation for corrective skull base surgery. Published normal ranges of CXA using x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vary dramatically, especially with neck flexion or extension. The aim of this study was to use high-resolution MRI to determine the normal range of CXA in various neck positions using a reproducible measurement technique.

METHODS

The CXA was measured in 10 healthy volunteers on sagittal T2 SPACE c-spine MRI in supine and prone positions and with the neck both neck and extended. CXA is strictly defined as the angle between a line along the inferior third of the dorsal clival cortex and a line from the superior/posterior cortex of the dens to the posterior/inferior corner of the C2 body. Statistical analysis was performed in all positions and included mean CXA, range, standard deviation (SD), inter-reader agreement, and group comparisons.

RESULTS

The mean CXA overall was 156.92° (SD=4.23°; range 134-179°). The mean value for extension CXA was 169.20° (SD=5.81°), and the mean value for flexion CXA was 144.73° (SD=5.71°), the difference being statistically significant (p<0.0001) regardless of supine or prone position. Concordant correlations of reader measurements showed substantial agreement in the supine position at 0.96, with lower agreement in the prone position at 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

We report normal ranges for CXA in various neck positions based on 3D T2-weighted MRI, using a reproducible measurement method. There was a significant difference in the CXA values between neck extended and neck flexed positions but not between supine and prone positions.