Hangman's Fracture

Hangman's Fractures: A Review of Current Concepts in Evaluation and Management

STUDY DESIGN

Review article.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review and update on the evaluation and management of Hangman's fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture of the C2 vertebrae, and the prevalence is increasing with our aging population. Although these injuries are associated with good clinical outcomes and low rates of neurologic injury, they must be promptly recognized and treated according to patient and fracture factors.

METHODS

A review of the literature.

RESULTS

Neurologic injuries are uncommon in typical Hangman's fractures but are more of a concern in atypical Hangman's fractures due to lack of dissociation of the posterior ring of C2. The nonoperative treatment of stable type I, II, and atypical fractures with external immobilization leads to excellent long-term outcomes as does the operative treatment of unstable type IIa, III, and atypical fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Stable injury patterns can be treated with immobilization alone, whereas unstable injury patterns necessitate surgical treatment. Prompt diagnosis and treatment Hangman's fractures is paramount, and when managed properly, patients can have excellent clinical and neurologic outcomes.

Awake reduction of hangman's fracture: An era of dexmedetomidine

Hangman's fracture is a kind of unstable cervical spine injury which should be treated promptly to avoid life threatening consequences. Advanced neurological monitoring is essential during surgical intrervention. Resource limited setting, where advanced monitors like SSEP and MEP are not available makes it challenging to assess proper reduction of cervical spine without neurological compromise. Dexmedetomidine proved to be very useful drug to assess the neurological status intra operatively by awake sedation.

Biomedical analysis of four fixation systems in treatment of type II traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis: a finite element analysis

This study aimed to compare the properties and safety of self-designed plates in type II traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with those of traditional devices via finite element (FE) analysis. We constructed a hangman's fracture FE model from the occipital bone (C0) level to the C3 level. Then, FE models were constructed for the following four fixation systems: an anterior cervical L-shaped plate with four vertebral screws (4-ACLP), or six screws (6-ACLP), an anterior cervical orion plate (ACOP), and a posterior fixation system. A preloaded compressive force of 50 N and a moment of 1.5 N·m were applied to each model under six working conditions. The mobility of the C2/3 segment decreased significantly in four fixation models. In the Mises stress cloud diagram, 4-ACLP showed a better stress distribution in both the bone graft and fixation system than 6-ACLP and ACOP. The resultant force of 4-ACLP was lower but higher than ACOP in axial force. Additionally, the cage in the 4-ACLP configuration experienced the highest stress in the six working conditions. Hence, this novel self-designed plate has the potential to mitigate the operational difficulties, provide sufficient stability, reduce the risk of plate or screw fractures, and improve bone fusion.

Anterior atlantoaxial motion preservation fixation technique for axis complex fractures (odontoid process with Hangman's fractures) and technique notes

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of anterior atlantoaxial motion preservation fixation (AMPF) in treating axis complex fractures involving the odontoid process fracture and Hangman's fractures with C2/3 instability. A retrospective study was conducted on eight patients who underwent AMPF for axis complex fractures at the General Hospital of Central Theater Command from February 2004 to October 2021. The types of axis injuries, reasons for injuries, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, spinal cord injury classification (American Spinal Injury Association, ASIA), as well as complications and technical notes, were documented. This study included eight cases of type II Hangman's fracture, five cases of type II and three cases of type III odontoid process fracture. Five patients experienced traffic accidents, while three patients experienced falling injuries. All patients underwent AMPF surgery with an average intraoperative blood loss of 288.75 mL and a duration of 174.5 min. Two patients experienced dysphagia 1 month after surgery. The patients were followed up for an average of 15.63 months. One case improved from C to E in terms of neurological condition, three cases improved from D to E, and four cases remained at E. Bony fusion and Atlantoaxial Motion Preservation were successfully achieved for all eight patients. AMPF is a feasible and effective way for simultaneous odontoid process fracture and Hangman's fractures with C2/3 instability, while preserving atlantoaxial movement.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Traumatic C2 Vertebral Fracture : A Literature Review

The integrity of the high cervical spine, the transition zone from the brainstem to the spinal cord, is crucial for survival and daily life. The region protects the enclosed neurovascular structure and allows a substantial portion of the head motion. Injuries of the high cervical spine are frequent, and the fractures of the C2 vertebra account for approximately 17-25% of acute cervical fractures. We review the two major types of C2 vertebral fractures, odontoid fracture and Hangman's fracture. For both types of fractures, favorable outcomes could be obtained if the delicately selected conservative treatment is performed. In odontoid fractures, as the most common fracture on the C2 vertebrae, anterior screw fixation is considered first for type II fractures, and C1-2 fusion is suggested when nonunion is a concern or occurs. Hangman's fractures are the second most common fracture. Many stable extension type I and II fractures can be treated with external immobilization, whereas the predominant flexion type IIA and III fractures require surgical stabilization. No result proves that either anterior or posterior surgery is superior, and the surgeon should decide on the surgical method after careful consideration according to each clinical situation. This review will briefly describe the basic principles and current treatment concepts of C2 fractures.

Comparison of complication rates between anterior versus posterior approaches for treating unstable Hangman's fracture. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study design

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective

To compare the complication rates associated with anterior and posterior approaches for the surgical treatment of unstable hangman's fractures.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify comparative studies reporting complications of anterior versus posterior approaches for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures.

Results

The search yielded 1163 papers from which 5 studies were fully included. One hundred fifteen (115) patients were operated on using an anterior approach versus 65 through a posterior approach. The average complication rates for the anterior and posterior approaches were 26.1 % and 13.8 %, respectively. No complications following the anterior approach required pharmacological or surgical intervention (Clavien-Dindo, Grade 1), while 88.9 % of complications following the posterior approach did (Clavien-Dindo, Grade 2).

Conclusion

No significant differences in the complication rates were found when comparing anterior versus posterior surgery for treating a C2 traumatic spondylolisthesis. However, most of the complications presented in the posterior surgery group were more severe.

Comparison of the efficacies of TINAVI robot-assisted surgery and conventional open surgery for Levine-Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures

The objective was to compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation with the aid of the TINAVI orthopaedic surgery robot with that of traditional open surgery for Levine-Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TINAVI robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery procedure. The clinical data of 60 patients with Levine-Edward type IIA (postreduction) hangman fractures treated surgically from June 2015 to February 2022 were analysed retrospectively. Among these patients, 25 were treated with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under TINAVI (the robot group), and 35 were treated with pedicle screw implantation assisted by a conventional C-arm X-ray machine (the traditional operation group). The pedicle screw placement grade was evaluated according to the Rampersaud scale. The correct rate of pedicle screw placement was calculated. The invasion of adjacent facet joints, VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale), NDI score (Neck Disability Index), SF-36 score (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire), EQ-5D score (EuroQol-5 dimensions questionnaire) and operation-related data were recorded, and patients were followed up. All patients were followed up for an average of 15.0 ± 3.4 months. The accuracy of screw placement in the robot group was higher than that in the traditional operation group, while the rates of intraoperative blood loss and invasion of the facet joint were lower and the incision length and length of hospital stay were shorter. On the 3rd day after the operation, the VAS score in the robot group was significantly higher than that in the traditional operation group, but there was no significant difference in the NDI score. On the 3rd day after the operation, the SF-36 and EQ-5 questionnaire scores of the robot group were better than those of the traditional operation group. No complications occurred in any of the patients. Postoperative cervical X-ray showed that the cervical vertebra was stable, and there was no fracture, angle or displacement. Postoperative CT showed that all fractures healed, and the average healing time was 3.4 months. The treatment of Levine-Edward IIA (postrepositioning) hangman fractures with percutaneous pedicle fixation assisted by the TINAVI orthopaedic surgery robot can significantly improve screw placement accuracy with a low rate of invasion of the adjacent facet joint, a short operation time, a low bleeding rate, and high patient satisfaction. Although there are still many disadvantages, it still has good prospects for application.

Direct Screw Osteosynthesis for an Elderly Osteoporotic Patient With C2 Complex Fracture

There are various types of C2 fractures, including odontoid fractures, hangman fractures, and complex fractures, which involve the vertebral body or multiple fracture types. The published literature on C2 complex fractures is limited, and treatment strategies have not yet been established. An 80-year-old woman with a history of osteoporosis, brain stroke, and cervical spondylosis fell and sustained a C2 complex fracture. Initial treatment with a cervical collar was unsuccessful and a C2 direct screw osteosynthesis surgery was performed under an image-guided three-dimensional navigation system. The surgical procedure was successfully performed with a surgical time of 83 minutes and a blood loss of 31 ml. Her neck pain improved after surgery. Follow-up CT scans revealed acceptable healing of the fracture four months later. C2 direct screw osteosynthesis is a viable treatment option for C2 complex fractures, particularly in elderly patients who may benefit from early stabilization of the fracture to prevent complications associated with long-term conservative treatment.

Revision Procedure After Surgery for Atypical Hangman's Fracture Primarily Performed Only from the Posterior Approach - An Attempt to Maintain Head Rotation: Case Report

Introduction

Hangman's fracture, also known as traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis, is defined as a bilateral fracture of the C2 pars interarticularis. In 1965, Schneider used this term to describe a pattern of similarities seen in fractures associated with judicial hangings. However, this fracture pattern is only observed in approximately 10% of injuries associated with hangings.

Case Report

We present a case of an atypical hangman's fracture caused by a headlong dive into a swimming pool and striking the pool's bottom. The patient had undergone surgery at another centre, where posterior C2-C3 stabilisation was performed. Due to the presence of screws in the C1-C2 joint spaces, the patient could not perform rotational movements of the head. Anterior stabilization to prevent C2 dislocation against C3 was also not performed, and appropriate spinal stability was not ensured. Our decision to reoperate was motivated, among other factors, by our intention to restore rotational head movements. The revision surgery was performed from both an anterior and posterior approach. After the surgery, the patient was able to rotate his head while maintaining cervical spine stability. The case presented here represents not only a unique example of an atypical C2 fracture but also highlights a fixation technique that provided the necessary stability for successful fusion. The utilized method restored functional rotational movement of the head, thus preserving the patient's quality of life, which is of paramount importance considering the patient's age.

Conclusion

The decision-making process regarding the technique for treating hangman's fractures, especially atypical fractures, should account for the patients' quality of life after the operation. The preservation of as much of the physiological range of motion as possible with maintained spinal stability should be the goal of therapy in every case.

Is it feasible to treat unstable traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis via posterior fixation without fusion?

BACKGROUND

Few studies reported treatment of unstable traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis using posterior fixation without fusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results and feasibility of posterior fixation without fusion in treating unstable traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis.

METHODS

Eleven patients with traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis were included in this study, and posterior fixation without fusion using screw-rod system was performed for them. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Odom's grading system. Plain radiography was used to measure the displacement and angulation of C2-C3, and cervical lordosis. Plain radiography and computed tomography were also used to observe the bony fusions of fracture lines and postoperative spontaneous fusion of C2-C3.

RESULTS

The mean follow up time was 24.6 months (range, 12-72 months). The VAS and NDI scores were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared with those before operation (P < 0.05), and according to Odom's criteria, 90.9% (10/11) of patients rated their level of satisfaction as excellent or good. The angulation and displacement of C2-C3, and cervical lordosis were significantly improved after operation compared with those before operation (P < 0.05), and at the final follow-up, and these radiological parameters were maintained. All patients achieved solid bony fusions of fracture lines. No operative segment instability was found in all patients during the follow-up period. Spontaneous fusion at bilateral C2-C3 facet joints was found in 11 cases, and anterior and/or posterior bony bridge of intervertebral bodies at C2-C3 was found in 9 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior fixation without fusion may be a feasible and effective option for unstable traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis.

C2-C3 Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Hangman's Fractures with C2 Posterior Dislocation: Technical Notes

BACKGROUND

The overwhelming majority of hangman's fractures cause anterior dislocation of C2. Hangman's fracture with C2 posterior dislocation is extremely rare; only 1 pediatric case was reported in 2018 to date. This kind of injury cannot be cataloged using current classification schemes, and no established treatment recommendations exist. The purpose of this article is to report a rare case of a hangman's fracture with C2 posterior dislocation, which does not fit into existing classification systems and discuss management technical notes to avoid pitfalls.

METHODS

We describe this case, review relevant literature, and share our experience.

RESULTS

A 31-year-old male sustained a hangman's fracture with C2 posterior dislocation after he fell into a 50-cm deep roadside ditch when riding a motorcycle. Radiograph and computed tomography on admission showed fractures through both pars of C2 and C2 posterior dislocation. Magnetic resonance imaging on admission showed high T2-weighted signal intensity of cervical spinal cord and compression of the cervical spinal cord by posterior dislocation of the C2 vertebral body. A C2-3 anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion was performed. At 6 months after operation, bony fusion was achieved and magnetic resonance imaging showed the T2-weighted signal hyperintensity of cervical spinal cord before surgery disappeared.

CONCLUSIONS

C2-C3 anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion is recommended for hangman's fractures with C2 posterior dislocation. Traction before surgery is not recommended.

Upper Cervical Trauma

Craniocervical injuries (CCJs) account for 10% to 30% of all cervical spine trauma. An increasing number of patients are surviving these injuries due to advancements in automobile technology, resuscitation techniques, and diagnostic modalities. The leading injury mechanisms are motor vehicle crashes, falls from height, and sports-related events. Current treatment with urgent rigid posterior fixation of the occiput to the cervical spine has resulted in a substantial reduction in management delays expedites treatment of CCJ injuries. Within CCJ injuries, there is a spectrum of instability, ranging from isolated nondisplaced occipital condyle fractures treated nonoperatively to highly unstable injuries with severely distracted craniocervical dissociation. Despite the evolution of understanding and improvement in the management of cases regarding catastrophic failure to diagnose, subsequent neurologic deterioration still occurs even in experienced trauma centers. The purpose of this article is to review the injuries that occur at the CCJ with the accompanying anatomy, presentation, imaging, classification, management, and outcomes.

Current updates on various treatment approaches in the early management of acute spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition which often leads to a severe disability and ultimately impact patient's physical, psychological, and social well-being. The management of acute SCI has evolved over the couple of decades due to improved understanding of injury mechanisms and increasing knowledge of disease. Currently, the early management of acute SCI patient includes pharmacological agents, surgical intervention and newly experimental neuroprotective strategies. However, many controversial areas are still surrounding in the current treatment strategies for acute SCI, including the optimal timing of surgical intervention, early versus delayed decompression outcome benefits, the use of methylprednisolone. Due to the lack of consensus, the optimal standard of care has been varied across treatment centres. The authors have shed a light on the current updates on early treatment approaches and neuroprotective strategies in the initial management of acute SCI in order to protect the early neurologic injury and reduce the future disability.