Laminoplasty Achieves Improved Outcomes Despite Leading to a More Positive Sagittal Balance: Neither Preoperative Nor Postoperative Sagittal Balance Correlated With Spine-specific Outcome Data

The biportal endoscopic posterior open-door laminoplasty with the use of mini-plate for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Biportal endoscopy, a newly developed technique rapidly applied in lumbar spine surgery, has recently been utilized for treating cervical spine diseases. We present a case of cervical spondylotic myelopathy managed with open-door laminoplasty fixed by mini-plate and performed with biportal endoscopy assistance.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

The patient, a 62-year-old woman, presented with gradually developing weakness in the lower extremities. CT and MR images showed cervical stenosis at C4-5 and C5-6. We performed a posterior open-door laminoplasty using biportal endoscopy assisted by a mini-plate. After completing the gutters on both sides of the hinge and open-door, we detached the spinous process from the lamina through endoscopic-guided burr grinding. The skin incisions of the portals on the open-door side were connected for direct fixation of the elevated lamina with a mini-plate. There was improvement in ambulatory capacity for the patient along with radiological evidence of decompressed cervical canal.

DISCUSSION

Endoscopic technology is increasingly employed in spinal surgery, with several studies documenting the utilization of biportal endoscopic techniques to facilitate open-door laminoplasty procedures for managing myelopathic cervical spondylosis. The procedures we report allow for safer and more efficient placement of the mini-plate that prevents door re-closing.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential applications of biportal endoscopic technology in open-door cervical spine surgery are worth considering, given the soft tissue damage caused by traditional posterior cervical spine surgery. However, the safety and effectiveness of this method still require more studies with a larger number of cases and longer follow-up to be substantiated.

Multilevel Laminoplasty for CSM: Is C3 Laminectomy Better Than C3 Laminoplasty at the Superior Vertebra?

INTRODUCTION

In a multilevel cervical laminoplasty operation for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), a partial or complete C3 laminectomy may be performed at the upper level instead of a C3 plated laminoplasty. It is unknown whether C3 technique above the laminoplasty affects loss of cervical lordosis or range of motion.

METHODS

Patients undergoing multilevel laminoplasty of the cervical spine (C3-C6/C7) at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on surgical technique at C3: C3-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty ("C3 laminoplasty only", N = 61), C3 partial or complete laminectomy, plus C4-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty (N = 39). All patients had at least 1-year postoperative X-ray treatment.

RESULTS

Of 100 total patients, C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy were equivalent in all demographic data, except for age (66.4 vs. 59.4 years, p = 0.012). None of the preoperative radiographic parameters differed between the C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy cohorts: cervical lordosis (13.1° vs. 11.1°, p = 0.259), T1 slope (32.9° vs. 29.2°, p = 0.072), T1 slope-cervical lordosis (19.8° vs. 18.6°, p = 0.485), or cervical sagittal vertical axis (3.1 cm vs. 2.7 cm, p = 0.193). None of the postoperative radiographic parameters differed between the C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy cohorts: cervical lordosis (9.4° vs. 11.2°, p = 0.369), T1 slope-cervical lordosis (21.7° vs. 18.1°, p = 0.126), to cervical sagittal vertical axis (3.3 cm vs. 3.6 cm, p = 0.479). In the total cohort, 31% had loss of cervical lordosis >5°. Loss of lordosis reached 5-10° (mild change) in 13% of patients and >10° (moderate change) in 18% of patients. C3 laminoplasty and C3 laminectomy cohorts did not differ with respect to no change (<5°: 65.6% vs. 74.3%, respectively), mild change (5-10°: 14.8% vs. 10.3%), and moderate change (>10°: 19.7% vs. 15.4%) in cervical lordosis, p = 0.644. When controlling for age, ordinal regression showed that surgical technique at C3 did not increase the odds of postoperative loss of cervical lordosis. C3 laminectomy versus C3 laminoplasty did not differ in the postoperative range of motion on cervical flexion-extension X-rays (23.9° vs. 21.7°, p = 0.451, N = 91).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in postoperative loss of cervical lordosis or postoperative range of motion in patients who underwent either C3-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty or C3 laminectomy plus C4-C6/C7 plated laminoplasty.

Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Complex in Spinal Deformity Secondary to Surgical Resection of the Intradural Tumor

OBJECTIVE

In most cases, complete resection of the intradural tumor is accompanied by long-term neurological complications. Postoperative spinal deformity is the most common complication after surgical resection of intradural tumors, and posterior longitudinal ligament complex (PLC) plays an important role in postoperative spinal deformity. In this study, we investigated the role of PLC in spinal deformity after the surgical treatment of intradural tumors.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 218 consecutive patients who underwent intradural tumor resection from 2000 to 2018 in this retrospective study. Before 2010, patients underwent laminoplasty without maintaining the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty group, n = 155). After 2010, patients performed single-port laminoplasty to maintain the integrity of PLC (laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group, n = 63). The score of quality of life, painful cortex, spinal cord movement, progressive kyphosis or scoliosis, perioperative morbidity, and neurological results were analyzed in the laminoplasty group and laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The distributed variable was shown as mean ± standard deviation and an independent t-test or one-way analysis of variance was calculated.

RESULTS

There are 155 patients (71.1%) included in the laminoplasty group, and 63 patients (28.9%) in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group. The average age of patients was 42 ± 2.3 years, and the average modified McCormick score was 2. There were 158 (72.4%) patients with intramedullary tumors and 115 (52.7%) patients with extramedullary tumors. The length of hospital stays (8 days vs. 6 days; p = 0.023) and discharge to inpatient rehabilitation (48.4% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.012) were significantly lower in the laminoplasty retain posterior ligament complex group than the laminoplasty group. There was no significant difference in the risk of progressive deformity between the two groups at 18 months after surgery (relative risk 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.25; p = 0.258) and at 20 months after surgery (relative risk 0.24; 95% CI 0.21-2.1).

CONCLUSION

Laminoplasty retains posterior ligament complex showed no impact on the spinal deformities compared with laminoplasty, but significantly improved the postoperative spinal activity, alleviated pain symptoms, and reduced hospital recovery time.

Anatomical considerations for appropriate mini-plate positioning in open-door laminoplasty to avoid plate impingement and screw facet violation

This study aimed to describe a safe zone for mini-plate positioning that can avoid instrument-related complications in laminoplasty. Fifty-one patients who underwent laminoplasty and were followed up for at least 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. The posterior surface length and inferior pole angle of the lateral mass were measured at each level using computed tomography. The safe zone was defined based on these measurements. Incidences of screw facet violation and plate impingement were recorded. Patient-reported outcome measures were compared between the appropriate position (AP) and inappropriate position (IP) groups. Among 40 patients included, 15 (37.5%) had inappropriate plate positioning, causing screw facet violation or plate impingement, which more commonly occurred at distal (C5, C6) and proximal (C3, C4) levels, respectively. Lateral mass posterior surface length was shorter at the proximal levels, and the inferior pole angle of the lateral mass was smaller at the distal levels, signifying that the lateral mass became thin and long at the distal levels. Patient-reported outcome measures were not significantly different between the two groups. However, cervical range of motion at the final follow-up was significantly less in the IP group (p = 0.01). The suggested safe zone demonstrates that inserting the mini-plate with plate-to-lateral mass inferior pole distances of 4–5 mm and 5–6 mm at the C3–C5 and C6–C7 levels, respectively, would avoid instrument-related complications. The risk of plate impingement was higher at the proximal level, whereas the risk of screw facet violation was higher at the distal level in open-door cervical laminoplasty. These risks coincide with anatomical differences at each level. Despite inappropriate positioning of the mini-plate, clinical outcomes were not adversely affected.