1
|
Daniels AH, Daher M, Singh M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Diebo BG, Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Fessler RG, Gum JL, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish KM, Klineberg EO, Lewis SJ, Line BG, Nunley PD, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Buell T, Scheer JK, Mullin JP, Soroceanu A, Ames CP, Lenke LG, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Lafage V, Schwab FJ. The Case for Operative Efficiency in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Impact of Operative Time on Complications, Length of Stay, Alignment, Fusion Rates, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:313-320. [PMID: 37942794 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To analyze the impact of operative room (OR) time in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery on patient outcomes. BACKGROUND It is currently unknown if OR time in ASD patients matched for deformity severity and surgical invasiveness is associated with patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS ASD patients with baseline and two-year postoperative radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) data, undergoing a posterior-only approach for long fusion (>L1-Ilium) were included. Patients were grouped into short OR time (<40th percentile: <359 min) and long OR time (>60th percentile: >421 min). Groups were matched by age, baseline deformity severity, and surgical invasiveness. Demographics, radiographic, PROM data, fusion rate, and complications were compared between groups at baseline and two years follow-up. RESULTS In total, 270 patients were included for analysis: the mean OR time was 286 minutes in the short OR group versus 510 minutes in the long OR group ( P <0.001). Age, gender, percent of revision cases, surgical invasiveness, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic tilt were comparable between groups ( P >0.05). Short OR had a slightly lower body mass index than the short OR group ( P <0.001) and decompression was more prevalent in the long OR time ( P =0.042). Patients in the long group had greater hospital length of stay ( P =0.02); blood loss ( P <0.001); proportion requiring intensive care unit ( P =0.003); higher minor complication rate ( P =0.001); with no significant differences for major complications or revision procedures ( P >0.5). Both groups had comparable radiographic fusion rates ( P =0.152) and achieved improvement in sagittal alignment measures, Oswestry disability index, and Short Form-36 ( P <0.001). CONCLUSION Shorter OR time for ASD correction is associated with a lower minor complication rate, a lower estimated blood loss, fewer intensive care unit admissions, and a shorter hospital length of stay without sacrificing alignment correction or PROMs. Maximizing operative efficiency by minimizing OR time in ASD surgery has the potential to benefit patients, surgeons, and hospital systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Manjot Singh
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - David K Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin S Smith
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Richard G Fessler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical School, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX
| | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
| | | | - Thomas Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koshimizu H, Nakashima H, Ohara T, Tauchi R, Kanemura T, Shinjo R, Machino M, Ito S, Ando K, Imagama S. Implant-Related Complications after Spinal Fusion: A Multicenter Study. Global Spine J 2024; 14:74-81. [PMID: 35400240 PMCID: PMC10676178 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221094267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of prospectively database. OBJECTIVE Implant-related complications are an extremely important issue because they pose a burden to patients who underwent surgery. An understanding of these complications can help improve the postoperative management of patients undergoing spinal surgery. The current large-scale multicenter study aimed to identify postoperative implant-related complications that may require revision surgery. METHODS In total, 3447 patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery were included in the analysis. Data about age at surgery, sex, preoperative diagnosis, surgical level, type of implant-related complications, causes of reoperation, and time from the initial to revision surgery were reviewed. Moreover, the characteristics of reoperation in 3 periods (within 30, 31-90, and over 90 days) were assessed. RESULT The overall incidence of implant-related complications was 4.6%. Adult spinal deformity was the most common diagnosis (9.9%), and thoracic-lumbar-sacral (42.9%) was the most common surgical level among patients with implant-related complications. Further, screw malposition was the most frequent implant-related complication (42.8%). In total, 89 (2.6%) patients underwent reoperation due to implant-related complications. The main causes of reoperation within 30, 31-90, and over 90 days were screw malposition (72.2%), screw loosening or pull out (81.8%), and rod or screw fracture (60.9%), respectively. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this was the first large-scale multicenter study that assessed the characteristics of patients who underwent reoperation due to spinal implant-related complications. The study results could improve the preoperative informed consent procedure about spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Koshimizu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nakashima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Ohara
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Meijo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ryoji Tauchi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Meijo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tokumi Kanemura
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Shinjo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan
| | - Masaaki Machino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Sadayuki Ito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kei Ando
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shiro Imagama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Postoperative coronal malalignment after adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, risk factors, and impact on 2-year outcomes. Spine Deform 2023; 11:187-196. [PMID: 36208395 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00583-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with postoperative coronal malalignment. METHODS A single-institution, retrospective cohort study of ASD patients undergoing ≥ 6 level fusions from 2015 to 2019 was undertaken. The primary outcome was postoperative coronal malalignment, defined as C7-coronal vertical axis (CVA) > 3 cm. Secondary outcomes included: complications, readmissions, reoperations, and 2-year PROs. RESULTS A total of 243 ASD patients undergoing spinal surgery had preoperative and immediate postoperative measurements, and 174 patients (72%) had 2-year follow-up. Mean age was 49.3 ± 18.3yrs and mean instrumented levels was 13.5 ± 3.9. Mean preoperative CVA was 2.9 ± 2.7 cm, and 90 (37%) had preoperative coronal malalignment. Postoperative coronal malalignment occurred in 43 (18%) patients. Significant risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment were: preoperative CVA (OR 1.21, p = 0.001), preoperative SVA (OR 1.05, p = 0.046), pelvic obliquity (OR 1.21; p = 0.008), Qiu B vs. A (OR 4.17; p = 0.003), Qiu C vs. A (OR 7.39; p < 0.001), lumbosacral fractional (LSF) curve (OR 2.31; p = 0.021), max Cobb angle concavity opposite the CVA (OR 2.10; p = 0.033), and operative time (OR 1.16; p = 0.045). Postoperative coronal malalignment patients were more likely to sustain a major complication (31% vs. 14%; p = 0.01), yet no differences were seen in readmissions (p = 0.72) or reoperations (p = 0.98). No significant differences were seen in 2-year PROs (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative coronal malalignment occurred in 18% of ASD patients and was most associated with preoperative CVA/SVA, pelvic obliquity, Qiu B/C curves, LSF curve concavity to the same side as the CVA, and maximum Cobb angle concavity opposite side of the CVA. Postoperative coronal malalignment was significantly associated with increased complications but not readmission, reoperation, or 2-year PROs.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mundis GM, Walker CT, Smith JS, Buell TJ, Lafage R, Shaffrey CI, Eastlack RK, Okonkwo DO, Bess S, Lafage V, Uribe JS, Lenke LG, Ames CP. Kickstand rods and correction of coronal malalignment in patients with adult spinal deformity. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:1197-1205. [PMID: 35292847 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07161-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Coronal malalignment (CM) is a challenging spinal deformity to treat. The kickstand rod (KR) technique is powerful for correcting truncal shift. This study tested the hypothesis that the KR technique provides superior coronal alignment correction in adult deformity compared with traditional rod techniques. METHODS A retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected multicenter database was performed. A 2:1 matched cohort of non-KR accessory rod and KR patients was planned based on preoperative coronal balance distance (CBD) and a vector of global shift. Patients were subgrouped according to CM classification with a 30-mm CBD threshold defining CM, and comparisons of surgical and clinical outcomes among groups was performed. RESULTS Twenty-one patients with preoperative CM treated with a KR were matched to 36 controls. KR-treated patients had improved CBD compared with controls (18 vs. 35 mm, P < 0.01). The postoperative CBD did not result in clinical differences between groups in patient-reported outcomes (P ≥ 0.09). Eight (38%) of 21 KR patients and 12 (33%) of 36 control patients with preoperative CM had persistent postoperative CM (P = 0.72). CM class did not significantly affect the likelihood of treatment failure (postoperative CBD > 30 mm) in the KR cohort (P = 0.70), the control cohort (P = 0.35), or the overall population (P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS Application of the KR technique to coronal spinal deformity in adults allows for successful treatment of CM. Compared to traditional rod techniques, the use of KRs did not improve clinical outcome measures 1 year after spinal deformity surgery but was associated with better postoperative coronal alignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Mundis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Corey T Walker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - David O Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan S Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, The Spine Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|